Crude Oil Washing
Crude Oil Washing
Crude Oil Washing
Let us now
look at how
this is
achieved!
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
COW (COW)
Majority of oil tankers carry crude oil
Crude carriers - biggest pollution threat.
International Agreement required to stop
all oil tankers carrying salt-water ballast
in cargo tanks.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
Alternative cleaning?
To obtain International Agreement on
such a controversial matter not easy
Idea was seriously considered by I.M.O.
Early 1970's oil companies commenced
investigating other alternatives.
Water -not a good cleaning agent for
crude oil
A Solvent was required.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
Experiments -results
Very successful - clear indication that
Naphtha was a much better cleaning
agent than water.
Problem - Naphtha is expensive, not
readily available for cleaning tanks on
crude ships.
10
Further Experiments
Tried machine washing tanks with actual
cargo, during discharge.
Not easy to persuade terminal and port
authorities to permit the tanks to be
washed with crude as the cargo was
being discharged.
11
Further Experiments
Evidence had to be provided that the
conditions governing such practices were
safe and the benefits were worthwhile.
Due to carefully monitored and controlled
experiments - current method of tank
washing with crude oil during discharge
has been accepted by most oil terminals
& port authorities, & approved by I.M.O.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
12
13
14
15
16
COW Operation
Main objective of COW - to remove crude
residue from cargo tanks
Residue upto 1% of cargo loaded.
300,000 dwt tanker = 3000 tons.
If COW effectively done, ROB cut to
around 500 tons, (most entrapped in
pipeline system and slop tanks).
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
17
COW Operation
At present COW not a complete
substitute for water washing
Does not dispense with L.O.T. if water
ballast is carried in crude tanks or
pumped through cargo piping.
18
COW Operation
Large crude tankers fitted with IGS &
closed loading & discharging systems
need to have an individual check list to
ensure all safety and monitoring
equipment as well as the actual pumping
and cleaning equipment is working
efficiently and free from leaks.
19
COW Operation
Failure of any equipment may justify
shutting down COW for safety or other
operational reasons.
Numerous types of equipment & methods
used to crude-wash individual ships.
Varies considerably - ship & circumstances.
O.C.I.M.F. - handbook called 'Guidelines for
Tank Washing with Crude Oil', outlines safe
procedures for COW operations.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
20
COW Operation
Most popular method at the present time
appears to divide COW of individual
tanks into two distinct phases.
1. Top wash (sometimes divided into two
separate operations)
2. Bottom Wash.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
COW Machines
Not all fixed-deck or submergedmounted machines are suitable for crude
washing.
Many of the older types have unsuitable,
nozzles and are prone to leak at glands
and other fittings when used for crude.
Various makes are in use.
31
COW Machines
Lavomatic Selective Arc T/C machine.
Suitable for crude and water washing.
Fixed through-deck mounting.
Fitted with a single nozzle on the end of
the drop-pipe and operated by a simple
gear train.
32
COW Machines
Lavomatic Selective Arc T/C machine.
Machine & drop-pipe can be withdrawn
for maintenance through aperture in deck
Driving/timing mechanism mounted
above deck.
Can be portable or an integral part of
each machine.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
33
COW Machines
Lavomatic Selective Arc T/C machine.
Portable version can be hydraulically or
pneumatically driven.
Fixed driving/timing mechanism is
hydraulically operated.
Driving/timing device - angle of nozzle
on each machine can be controlled for
top washing or bottom washing cycles
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
34
COW Machines
Lavomatic Selective Arc T/C machine.
Arc & radius of action should meet the
requirements of the particular wash
cycle.
Depending on type of equipment used &
size of ship, as many as 100 machines
may be required, with 10 - 15 in any one
tank to clean a 300,000-d.w.t. tanker.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
35
36
REMEMBER THAT
WASH TIMINGS AND
MACHINE
PROGRAMME ANGLES
ARE TO BE AS PER THE
CRUDE OIL WASHING
MANUAL OF THE SHIP
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
37
REGULATIONS REQUIRE
ALL TANKS TO BE BALLASTED ARE
TO BE CRUDE OIL WASHED FIRST
TWENTY FIVE PERCENT OF THE
BALANCE TANKS ARE TO BE CRUDE
OIL WASHED
ALL TANKS TO BE WASHED AT
LEAST ONCE EVERY FOUR MONTHS
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Advantages of COW
1. As the tanks are washed with cargo
during dischargea) The crude oil residue left clinging to the
ships side and internal members is
reduced substantially.
b) The build up of sludge and was in the
tank bottoms is largely eliminated.
47
Advantages of COW
2.Experience has shown that cargo loss
during tanker transportation is reduced
as a result of a comparison between
ships using COW and others cleaning
conventional means. In other words, by
washing with crude oil during discharge,
more of the cargo discharged ashore and
the individual tanks are left a lot cleaner.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
48
Advantages of COW
3.Tanks, which have been washed with
crude oil, require far less cleaning and
water washing, either for clean ballast or
for entry into a repair yard.
49
Advantages of COW
4.Less dirty ballast and wash water are
required for COW, so the potential for
pollution is reduced during tank cleaning
at sea.
50
Advantages of COW
5.With less salt water washing, steel
corrosion within the cargo tanks is
reduced
51
Disadvantages of COW
There are three main disadvantages to
COW as practiced at the present time1. It does not entirely eliminate the need for
washing with salt water, either for clean
ballast or entering a repair yard. It also
does nothing to clear and gas free
pipelines within the ship.
52
Disadvantages of COW
2.The need for ships to be fitted with an
inert gas system and fixed washing
machines designed for crude washing,
means that a lot of older and smaller
ships are unable to avail themselves for
COW without major modification and
expenditure.
53
Disadvantages of COW
3. COW -when ship is discharging
Means that normal discharge prolonged
Whole ship COW - normal shore facilities
discharge time > upto 25 % of normal.
If COW rotational (CBT + selected tanks)
this figure can be reduced to approx.
10%-15% of the normal discharge time,
Obviously crude recovered will be less.
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
54
ADVANTAGES OF C.O.W.
HIGHER CARGO OUT-TURN DUE TO:
LESS CLINGAGE, LESS SLUDGE
DEPOSITS, EFFICIENT DRAINAGE
VLCC ESTIMATED R.O.B. AFTER
DISCHARGE
WITHOUT COW - 1000 M3
WITH COW
- 300 M3
BENEFITS REFINERY, SHIPOWNER,
CHARTERER Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
55
ADVANTAGES OF C.O.W.
POLLUTION AVOIDANCE DUE TO:
LESSER OIL IN DEPARTURE BALLAST
LESSER WATER WASHING ENROUTE
NO WATER WASH FOR SLUDGE
CONTROL
LESSER SLOP RECOVERY AT END OF
BALLAST PASSAGE
BENEFITS ENVIRONMENT, OWNER,
REFINERY
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
56
ADVANTAGES OF C.O.W.
LESSER SALT CONTAMINATION DUE
TO:
REDUCED WATER WASHING
THEREFORE LESSER SALT
INTRODUCTION INTO THE TANKS
BENEFITS CARGO RECEIVERS,
REFINERY
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
57
ADVANTAGES OF C.O.W.
CARGO CARRYING CAPACITY
INCREASED, HENCE HIGHER
FREIGHT EARNINGS
BETTER CORROSION CONTROL
REDUCED WORKLOAD ON BALLAST
PASSAGE
DRASTIC REDUCTION IN DRYDOCK
PREPARATION TIME
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
58
Only advantages
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
59
DISCHARGE PERIOD
PORT WORK LOAD
POLLUTION RISKS
GAS GENERATION
PRESSURE SURGE RISKS
SKILLED MAINT. REQUIREMENT
EQUIPMENT COSTS
Capt. A.K. Sharma- Tankers - COW -
60