Review of Equity Audit Presentation-Findings 1

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Review of Equity Audit

Presentation/Findings
Jay Liedel

Description of equity audit


process
The purpose is to identify and attempt to strategize
towards making the school community more equitable for
all students.
Exposure to data suggesting inequity in Americas schools
(Shame of the Nation, Discipline data, etc)
Outline of 12 sections and introduction to rubric

Equity Audit Team


The team itself is comprised of 5 white females, a white
male, an African-American female, and an African
American male.
4 teachers, 1 para-professional, 1 school secretary, 1
student and the program administrator.

Systemic Equity?
Staff responded generally that systemic equity was of
great importance to the student population we serve
because or students have all been labelled with
disabilities. Specifically, they have all been labelled as
emotionally disturbed and this particular disability type,
as well as students with disabilities in general, are not
being served equitably in schools.

School Population
All students served in the community are special
education students who have specifically been labelled
with Emotional Disturbance (ED). Students are referred
due to extreme behavioral difficulties in a traditional
public school setting. Examples of referring behaviors
include but are not limited to: verbal and physical
aggression, defiance, inability to follow directions,
disrupting the educational environment, non-attendance,
etc.

Equity data collected


Teacher, Programmatic and Achievement data collected
Formal and informal methods
Data was collected from within our system only, we did
not have access to district wide data due to the scope
Graphs are provided in the report

Documentation of discussions
Discussion about the equity audit were had regularly with the team
including the program administrator. Some of the conversations and
discussions were recorded for later review to look for themes
throughout the conversations. Some of the conclusions and
prescriptions were amended during the presentation. The recorded
interviews and presentation are available for review. Direct quotes
from some of the interviews and discussions are included in this
report in the findings/conclusions section.
Located here: https://
www.youtube.com/channel/UCCCqDEI-7FBUd3Ma49xWk7g

Findings/Conclusions
Review of the data does not indicate trends in inequity in teacher, or achievement
domains that can be correlated to the specific learning environment (separate
facility)
3 themes emerged with regard to programmatic (and systemic) equity.
1. We serve students with the highest need for services with regard to curriculum, technology,
and mental health support, yet are in actuality accessing less. Even within our program(9-12)

2. The program is in a unique position of being asked to maintain positive relationships with the
districts we serve, since we serve at their pleasure, yet understanding the districts are not
allowing access to all the services our students need.
3. Staff identified a challenge in speaking truth to parents with regard to their childs reality in
that our students struggle in significant ways in society and outcomes are uncertain in a
general way.

Solutions?
Find/hire a qualified school/home liaison
Find mental health support for 9-12 classroom
Find/provide appropriate technology (attached?)

Reflection
The project really gave a focus to formal and informal discussions that
were already being had in our school community.
With every interview or discussion I had, I became more comfortable
with talking about important subjects in a meaningful way.
I learned that there are individuals who are willing to fight for these
issues.
As a team, we identified the need for attempting to apply pressure to
the districts we serve as advocates for our students without damaging
the relationship we currently hold. This will be challenging.

You might also like