Final Vision Project
Final Vision Project
Final Vision Project
JAY LIEDEL
EDAD 6/76526
FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
FALL 2014
SCHOOL VISION/MISSION
VISION TEAM
VISION TEAM
VISION TEAM
COMMON BELIEFS
SURVEY
JAY LIEDEL
Agree Strongly
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Disagree Strongly
70%
Agree
Disagree
60%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
20%
10%
0%
Agree Strongly
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Disagree Strongly
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Agree
Disagree
80%
20%
Agree
Disagree
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Agree
Disagree
60%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
Agree Strongly
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Disagree Strongly
70%
Agree
Disagree
66%
60%
50%
40%
33%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Agree Strongly
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Disagree Strongly
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Agree
Disagree
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Agree Strongly
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Disagree Strongly
70%
60%
60%
50%
40%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Agree
Disagree
0%
0%
0%
SURVEY INFORMATION
This survey was distributed to 4 teachers & 1 administrator (vision team).
This report reflects results of all the respondents.
Analysis
The survey consisted of low sample size thus generalizations are difficult to support. The data will be useful to
inform discussion when the vision team convenes.
SURVEY INFORMATION
This survey was distributed to 4 teachers & 1 administrator (vision team).
This report reflects results of all the respondents.
Analysis
The survey consisted of low sample size thus generalizations are difficult to support. The data will be useful to
inform discussion when the vision team convenes.
VISION DISCUSSION
OVERVIEW/ANALYSIS
JAY LIEDEL
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
(CONT.)
BACKGROUND
(CONT.)
VISION
& MISSION
Respondents
indicated that they were unaware of
vision and mission statements for our unit(s). It is
noted that the ESC does have them, yet teachers
were unaware of them and we felt as a team that
there is a clear need to define what we value and
what our mission is in the context of our small unit.
Teachers identified several components they thought
should be included in new vision and mission
statements and all agreed that the conversations
were imperative to the success of the program(s).
Common themes are as follows: Promoting success
across domains (behavioral and academic), student
engagement, including the community at large,
teaching self-regulation, and recognizing students
needs.
VALUES
Teachers identified specific values we hold as a unit as:
A premium on relationship building
Safety across all domains
Respect for others needs/differences
Effective communication
Teaching self-control
Bolstering self-esteem
A positive approach to discipline
Flexibility
Allowing students input into their education
STUDENT/PARENT/COMMUNITY INPUT
INTO THE SCHOOL EXPERIENCE
SPECIFIC CHALLENGES
SOLUTION 1
SOLUTION 2
SOLUTION 3
SELF-REFLECTION
JAY LIEDEL
THEMES
Video of Self-Reflection and digital short can be viewed here:
https://
www.youtube.com/channel/UCCCqDEI-7FBUd3Ma49xWk7g
Staff was open and honest with the process
Project served as a spark to initiate a larger process to include
a layer of core values over our meetings/decision making
Agreed to include discussion at all of our meetings
Project served to identify core values/beliefs/guiding principles
Project served to foster communication amongst staff
VISION
LEADERSHIP
EVALUATION
JAY LIEDEL
REFERENCES
Hands, C. M. (2010). Why collaborate? The differing reasons for
secondary school educators establishment of school-community
partnerships.School
Effectiveness & School Improvement,21(2),
189-207. doi:10.1080/09243450903553993
Pazey, B.L, & Cole, H.A, Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(10),
1-29, 2012.
SCHAFFT, K. A., & BIDDLE, C. (2013). Place and Purpose in Public
Education: School District Mission Statements and Educational (Dis)
Embeddedness.American Journal Of Education,120(1), 55-76.
Starratt, R.J., Ethical Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.