0% found this document useful (0 votes)
352 views31 pages

Risk and Return

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 31

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(FIN401)
Lecture 1:
Risk & Return Analysis
By: Sana Tauseef, CFA, MBA
Lecturer, Department of Economics and
Finance
Institute of Business Administration, Karachi
Email: sasghar@iba.edu.pk

Investment return is what you get


over and above your invested
capital

(Amount received Amount invested)

Return

= ____________________
Amount invested

For example, if $1,000 is invested and


$1,100 is returned after one year, the rate of
return for this investment is:
($1,100 - $1,000) / $1,000 = 10%

Risk and Return Analysis

The rate of return on an investment can be


calculated as follows:

Risk is related to the probability of


having a return different from the
expected return. It is measured through
calculating the variance or standard
deviation of the distribution of returns.

Risk and Return Analysis

Typically, investment returns are not


known with certainty

Risk and Return Analysis

Risk & Return may be


computed using
historical (realized) data
or prospective
(anticipated) data

Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

Nestle
Pakistan
0.00
45.67
72.08
38.16
48.22
35.71
72.26
-25.92
-6.56
90.60
59.89
29.05
55.10
18.49

BAHL
12.72
116.84
90.37
48.73
96.04
18.82
60.76
-57.10
73.12
39.92
0.06
38.30
45.40
34.86

2015

-13.94

-8.88

Average Return

34.59

40.66

Historical Risk

34.37

44.60

*Dividends are not included in the calculation of returns.

Risk and Return Analysis

Historical returns give an idea of how an


investment (stock) performed in the
past

Probability

Forecasted
Return
Nestle
Pakistan

Good

20%

70%

Average

60%

35%

Poor

20%

-5.6%

State of
Economy

Expected Return

33.88%

Expected Risk

42.26%

Risk and Return Analysis

Historical returns are adjusted


based on future forecasts

Risk and Return Analysis

In an efficient market, risk and


return factors are always positively
related

Std dev
CV
Mean

Risk and Return Analysis

Co-efficient of variation is a
standardized measure of
dispersion about the expected
value, that shows the risk per unit
of return...

Unsystematic risk is the firm-specific


risk and can be eliminated through
diversification.
Systematic risk is the market risk and
can not be diversified away.

Risk and Return Analysis

Combining stocks in a portfolio


generally lowers risk

Risk and Return Analysis

Modern portfolio theory (meanvariance approach) was introduced


by Harry Markowitz with his paper
"Portfolio Selection," which
appeared in the 1952 Journal of
Finance. 38 years later, he shared a
Nobel Prize with Merton Miller and
William Sharpe for what has become
a broad theory for portfolio
selection.

10

Rational investors choose to hold


securities as part of a diversified
portfolio...
average

Portfolio Risk is lesser than the


weighted average risk of component
stocks

Risk and Return Analysis

Portfolio return is the weighted


return of component stocks

11

If the stocks are perfectly positively correlated,


there is no risk diversification.
If the stocks are perfectly negatively correlated,
there is maximum risk diversification.
If the correlation is between -1 and +1, there is
some risk diversification.
Lower the correlation value, higher is the risk
diversification.

Risk and Return Analysis

The variance/standard deviation of a


portfolio also reflects how the returns
on the stocks which comprise the
portfolio vary together

12

Correlation is positive but less than


+1 for most pairs of stocks
between Nestle and BAHL
between Nestle and

0.4816
0.2295

between Siemens and


between Nestle and Shell
between Siemens and
between BAHL and Shell

0.6160
0.3161
0.5711
0.5947

Correlations are calculated based on annual historical returns


(ignoring dividends) over a 14-year period (1999-2013)

Risk and Return Analysis

Correlation
Correlation
Siemens
Correlation
BAHL
Correlation
Correlation
Shell
Correlation

13

1. Select the securities to be included in


the portfolio
2. Identify the efficient combinations of
the selected securities
3. Pick up one combination that best suits
the risk-aversion of the investor

Risk and Return Analysis

There are three steps in efficient


portfolio formation

14

Portfolio possibilities curve plots the


expected return and risk of the portfolios
that can be formed using two assets.
Efficient frontier shows the efficient
portfolios-the combinations which offer
higher returns for a given level of risk.

Risk and Return Analysis

An investors objective in using the


mean-variance approach to portfolio
selection is to choose an efficient
portfolio

15

Nestle BAHL

Expected Return

40.41

8.89

36.3

34.55

Standard Deviation

Assuming the correlation of +1, -1 and 0.48, we


will plot the portfolio possibilities curve and
identify the efficient frontier.

Risk and Return Analysis

Assumed Expected Returns, standard


deviations and correlation:
Two-asset case

16

Weight
(Nestle)
Weight
(BAHL)
Portfolio
Return
Portfolio
Risk

34.55 34.90 35.25 35.42 35.60 35.95 36.30

WAR

34.55 34.90 35.25 35.42 35.60 35.95 36.30

Div Benefit

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.2

8.89

0.00

15.29 21.70 24.90 28.10 34.51 40.91

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Risk and Return Analysis

For the pairs with perfect positive


correlation, there is no risk diversification
and the risk of portfolio is equal to the
weighted average risk of individual
securities

0.00

17

When the correlation is +1, the minimumvariance frontier is an upward sloping


straight line
45.00
40.00

Risk and Return Analysis

35.00
30.00
25.00

Portfolio
Return
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
34.40 34.60 34.80 35.00 35.20 35.40 35.60 35.80 36.00 36.20 36.40

Portfolio Risk

18

Weight
(Nestle)
Weight
(BAHL)
Portfolio
Return

0.2

0.4

0.488

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.6

0.512

0.5

0.4

0.2

8.89
34.5
Portfolio Risk
5
34.5
WAR
5
Div Benefit
0.00

15.29 21.70 24.51 24.90 28.10 34.51 40.91


20.38 6.21

0.02

0.87

7.96 22.13 36.30

34.90 35.25 35.40 35.42 35.60 35.95 36.30


14.52 29.04 35.38 34.55 27.64 13.82 0.00

Global minimum-variance combination: Weight(N)= 0.488

Risk and Return Analysis

For the pairs with perfect negative


correlation, there is maximum risk
diversification and a combination of two
assets exists that provides a portfolio with
zero risk

19

When the correlation is -1, the minimum-variance


frontier has two linear segments. The two
segments join at the global minimum-variance
portfolio which has zero risk
45.00

35.00
30.00

Portfolio Return

25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0.00

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00

Risk and Return Analysis

40.00

Portfolio Risk
20

Weight
(Nestle)
Weight
(BAHL)
Portfolio
Return

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.45

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.6

0.5

0.55

0.4

0.2

8.89

15.29 21.70 24.90 23.30 28.10 34.51 40.91

Portfolio Risk 34.55 31.78 30.50 30.49 30.44 30.90 32.93 36.30
WAR
Div Benefit

Risk and Return Analysis

For the pairs with correlation between -1 and +1, there is


some risk diversification and as we lower the correlation,
holding other values constant, there are increasingly larger
potential benefits of diversification

34.55 34.90 35.25 35.42 35.33 35.60 35.95 36.30


0.00

3.12

4.75

4.93

4.89

4.69

3.02

Global minimum-variance combination: Weight(N)= 0.45

0.00

21

Between the extreme correlation values of -1


and +1, the minimum-variance frontier has a
bullet-like shape and the frontier bows out
further to the left as we lower the correlation
45.00
40.00

Risk and Return Analysis

35.00
30.00
25.00

Portfolio
20.00 Return
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
30.00

31.00

32.00

33.00

34.00

Portfolio Risk

35.00

36.00

37.00

22

One is never worse off for having


additional choices.
A new asset permits us to move to a
superior minimum-variance frontier.

Risk and Return Analysis

Would adding third asset improve the


available trade-offs between risk and
return???

23

p decreases as stocks added, because


they would not be perfectly correlated with
the existing portfolio.
Eventually the diversification benefits of
adding more stocks dissipates (after about
30 stocks), and for large stock portfolios,
p consists of the market risk only.

Risk and Return Analysis

How many different stocks must we hold


in order to have a well-diversified
portfolio???

24

Diversification effect increases as the


number of stocks in a portfolio
increases
Company-Specific Risk

Risk and Return Analysis

p (%)
35

20
Market Risk

10 20 30 40

2,000+

# Stocks in Portfolio

25

If beta = 0, the asset is risk-free.


If beta = 1.0, the security is just as risky as
the average stock.
If beta > 1.0, the security is riskier than
average.
If beta < 1.0, the security is less risky than
average.
Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5
to 1.5.

Risk and Return Analysis

Market risk is measured through Beta


Beta is the variation in the stock return
relative to the return of the market
portfolio

26

Betas on average are mean-reverting.


The mean-reverting level of beta is 1.
If the historical beta is above 1, the
adjusted beta will be below historical beta
and if the historical beta is below 1, the
adjusted beta will be above the historical
beta.

Adjusted beta:
2/3*Historical beta+1/3*1

Risk and Return Analysis

Adjusted beta is a better forecast of


future beta than is historical beta

27

Beta Calculated
Over:

Mean

Standard
Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

1 year

0.646

1.832

-40.029

44.646

2 years

0.626

1.166

-27.969

15.143

3 years

0.603

1.018

-20.148

9.167

4 years

0.577

0.938

-18.698

6.011

5 years

0.575

0.857

-17.798

4.297

6 years

0.572

0.803

-15.800

3.955

7 years

0.574

0.749

-13.957

3.143

8 years

0.580

0.700

-12.594

2.558

9 years

0.589

0.631

-11.394

2.456

10 years

0.593

0.579

-7.148

2.462

11 years

0.582

0.592

-6.911

2.454

12 years

0.572

0.618

-6.578

2.172

13 years

0.563

0.659

-6.471

1.791

14 years

0.561

0.637

-6.163

1.777

Average beta calculated using the total return price data on 325 stocks listed on the
Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE), for the period January 1999 to December 2012.
Tauseef, S. (2013). Beta Stationarity and Estimation Period: Evidence from
Pakistans Equity Market.

Risk and Return Analysis

Beta instability decreases as the estimation period increases


suggesting that the historical beta coefficients calculated
using longer estimation period are better in predicting the
future beta coefficients...

28

CAPM makes the following


assumptions

Risk and Return Analysis

Investors need only know about expected


returns, variances and correlations to determine
which asset/portfolio is optimal for them.
Investors have identical views about risky
assets returns, variances and correlations.
All assets are marketable and can be traded in
any size.
Investors can borrow or lend at the risk-free
rate without any limit.
There are no taxes, transaction costs and
29
spreads.

CAPM concludes that:


The relevant risk of an individual stock is its
contribution to the risk of a well-diversified
portfolio.
The return for a security/portfolio depends on:
I. Risk-free rate
II. Risk Premium available in the market
III. Security/portfolio risk

Risk and Return Analysis

CAPM specifiesa linear relationship


between risk and required return...

30

The relationship between beta and average


returns disappear when some important
fundamentals of the firm are added. The
average returns are negatively related to size
and positively related to book-to-market ratio.

Fama E.F. and K.R. French (1992). The Cross-Section of


Expected Stock Returns, The Journal of Finance, 47, 2,
427-465.

Risk and Return Analysis

Though CAPM is used widely model in


applications; however, the model has
failed badly in the empirical tests

31

You might also like