Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 410 views

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-277771554
    The document is a rubric for evaluating oral presentations for a Shark Tank project in a third grade economics class. The rubric assesses students on preparedness, collaboration with peers, content knowledge, staying on topic, comprehension of the topic, clear speaking, and volume. Students are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score. The categories examine how well prepared the student was, how much they worked with their group, their understanding of the content, and how clearly they presented to the class.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-277771554
    410 views1 page
    The document is a rubric for evaluating oral presentations for a Shark Tank project in a third grade economics class. The rubric assesses students on preparedness, collaboration with peers, content knowledge, staying on topic, comprehension of the topic, clear speaking, and volume. Students are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score. The categories examine how well prepared the student was, how much they worked with their group, their understanding of the content, and how clearly they presented to the class.

    Original Title

    oral presentation rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a rubric for evaluating oral presentations for a Shark Tank project in a third grade economics class. The rubric assesses students on preparedness, collaboration with peers, content knowledge, staying on topic, comprehension of the topic, clear speaking, and volume. Students are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score. The categories examine how well prepared the student was, how much they worked with their group, their understanding of the content, and how clearly they presented to the class.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    410 views1 page

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-277771554
    The document is a rubric for evaluating oral presentations for a Shark Tank project in a third grade economics class. The rubric assesses students on preparedness, collaboration with peers, content knowledge, staying on topic, comprehension of the topic, clear speaking, and volume. Students are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in each category, with 4 being the highest score. The categories examine how well prepared the student was, how much they worked with their group, their understanding of the content, and how clearly they presented to the class.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Oral Presentation Rubric : Shark Tank

    Third Grade Economics


    Student Name:
    CATEGORY

    ________________________________________
    4

    Preparedness

    Student is completely Student seems pretty


    prepared and has
    prepared but might
    obviously rehearsed. have needed a couple
    more rehearsals.

    The student is
    somewhat prepared,
    but it is clear that
    rehearsal was
    lacking.

    Student does not


    seem at all prepared
    to present.

    Collaboration with
    Peers

    Almost always
    listens to, shares
    with, and supports
    the efforts of others
    in the group. Tries to
    keep people working
    well together.

    Often listens to,


    shares with, and
    supports the efforts
    of others in the group
    but sometimes is not
    a good team member.

    Rarely listens to,


    shares with, and
    supports the efforts
    of others in the
    group. Often is not a
    good team member.

    Content

    Shows a full
    Shows a good
    Shows a good
    understanding of the understanding of the understanding of
    topic.
    topic.
    parts of the topic.

    Does not seem to


    understand the topic
    very well.

    Stays on Topic

    Stays on topic all


    (100%) of the time.

    Stays on topic most Stays on topic some


    (99-90%) of the time. (89%-75%) of the
    time.

    It was hard to tell


    what the topic was.

    Comprehension

    Student is able to
    accurately answer
    almost all questions
    posed by classmates
    about the topic.

    Student is able to
    accurately answer
    most questions posed
    by classmates about
    the topic.

    Student is able to
    accurately answer a
    few questions posed
    by classmates about
    the topic.

    Student is unable to
    accurately answer
    questions posed by
    classmates about the
    topic.

    Speaks Clearly

    Speaks clearly and


    distinctly all (10095%) the time, and
    mispronounces no
    words.

    Speaks clearly and


    distinctly all (10095%) the time, but
    mispronounces one
    word.

    Speaks clearly and


    distinctly most (9485%) of the time.
    Mispronounces no
    more than one word.

    Often mumbles or
    cannot be understood
    OR mispronounces
    more than one word.

    Volume

    Volume is loud
    enough to be heard
    by all audience
    members throughout
    the presentation.

    Volume is loud
    enough to be heard
    by all audience
    members at least
    90% of the time.

    Volume is loud
    enough to be heard
    by all audience
    members at least
    80% of the time.

    Volume often too soft


    to be heard by all
    audience members.

    Usually listens to,


    shares with, and
    supports the efforts
    of others in the
    group. Does not
    cause \"waves\" in
    the group.

    You might also like