Full Report Bernoulli Experiment Tiqa
Full Report Bernoulli Experiment Tiqa
Full Report Bernoulli Experiment Tiqa
CONTENT PAGE
• Abstract / summary 2
• Introduction 3-4
• Aims / objectives 4
• Theory 5-6
• Apparatus 6
• Experimental procedure 7
• Result 8-11
• Sample calculation 12
• Discussion 13-14
• Conclusion 15
• Recommendation 16
• References 16
• Appendices 17-19
1
ABSTRACT/SUMMARY
Objectives of this experiment is to investigate the validity of the Bernoulli equation when
applied to the steady flow of water in a tapered duct and to measure flow rates and both static
and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent or divergent tube of known geometry for a
range of steady flow rates. The combination of venturi meter complete with manometer and
the hydraulic bench were used. The experiment was conducted in order to find the time taken
to collect 3L of water, the volumetric flow rates of the water, the pressure difference at all
manometer tube (static head), velocity, dynamic head and also the total head. The data was
collected at three adjusted head differences which were 50mm, 100mm and 150mm for both
convergent and divergent flow. The experiment was run based on the Bernoulli’s principle. In
fluid dynamics, Bernoulli’s principle states that for an inviscid flow, an increase in the speed
of the fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in pressure or a decrease in the fluid’s
potential energy.[3] For convergent flow, the total head is 0.1658m (h1), 0.1635m (h2),
0.1613m (h3), 0.1542m (h4) and 0.1467m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1918m (h1),
0.1840m (h2), 0.1815m (h3), 0.1741m (h4) and 0.1610m (h5) for 100mm pressure difference
and 0.2132m (h1), 0.2135m (h2), 0.2094m (h3), 0.2004m (h4) and 0.1851m (h5) for 150 mm
pressure difference. Meanwhile, for divergent flow, the total head is 0.1520m (h1), 0.1463m
(h2), 0.1459m (h3), 0.1606m (h4) and 0.1787m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1684m
(h1), 0.1607m (h2), 0.1387m (h3), 0.1668m (h4) and 0.1984m (h5) for 100mm pressure
difference and 0.1798m (h1), 0.1649m (h2), 0.1408m (h3), 0.1670m (h4) and 0.2111m (h5) for
150mm pressure difference. The results show the reading of each manometer tubes increase
when the pressure difference increases.
2
INTRODUCTION
Bernoulli’s theorem states that the total energy (pressure energy, potential energy and
kinetic energy) of an incompressible and non-viscous fluid in steady flow through a pipe
remains constant throughout the flow, provided there is no source or sink of the fluid along
the length of the pipe.[5] This statement is due to the assumption that there is no loss energy
due to friction.
P/ + gh + 1/2 V2 = constant
Figure 1
3
The converging-diverging nozzle apparatus is used to show the validity of Bernoulli’s
Equation. It is also used to show the validity of the continuity equation where the fluid flows
is relatively incompressible. The data taken will show the presence of fluid energy losses,
often attributed to friction and the turbulence and eddy currents associated with a separation
of flow from the conduit walls.[4]
OBJECTIVES
1. To investigate the validity of the Bernoulli equation when applied to the steady flow
of water in a tapered duct.
2. To measure flow rates and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent or
divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates.
4
THEORY
Clearly stated that the assumptions made in deriving the Bernoulli’s equation is:
• The flow is steady and the velocity of the liquid is less than the critical velocity for
the liquid.
V12 P1 V2 P
+ + z1 = 2 + 2 + z2
2g γ 2g γ
Starting from a fluid element along a streamline derived the Bernoulli equation for steady
one-dimensional flow of an incompressible, in viscid fluid;
V2 P P0
+ +z
2g γ γ
Where;
z = the elevation,
If horizontal tube levelled correctly, then z1=z2 and the Bernoulli’s equation is simplified as;
V12 V2 P
= Velocity head = hv Total head, hT = hs + hv= +
2g 2g γ
5
Then derive the expression for the velocity V along the streamline as function of γ , P and
P0. From the continuity equation for steady incompressible flow, the mean velocity U at each
cross-section of the Venturi tube is:
Q
U
A
APPARATUS
1. Venture meter
3. Hydraulic bench
4. Stop watch
5. Water
6
PROCEDURE
The air bleed screw
venturi
2. Setup the venturi for the convergent flow position. Fully open the flow control valve
to let the water flow into the venturi and manometer tubes.
5. Regulate the air bleed screw until water level in manometer tubes reach 140 mm.
7. Regulate valve 1 slowly to get the different between water level in manometer tube
H1 and H5 is 50 mm.
9. Drop the ball in the water tank. Decide the volume of water that will be taken, let say
3liter, take the time for volume of water to reach the 3liter.
10. Repeats steps 7-8 for difference between H1 and H5 to be 100 mm and 150 mm.
RESULTS
• Divergent flow
8
Distance Area of duct, Static Velocity, Dynamic Total
into duct A (m2) x 10-6 head v (m/s) head (m) head, h0
(m) (mm) (m)
• Convergent flow
10
3. Pressure difference: 150mmH2O
SAMPLE OF CALCULATIONS
Volume collected = 3 L
1000L = 1m3
3.00L = 3.00L x 1m3
1000L
= 3.0 x 10-3 m3
Flow rate =
= 0.003
24.47
11
Velocity, v =
= 1.23 x 10-4
490.9 x 10-6
= 0.2506 m/s
Dynamic head =
= (0.2506)2
2 x 9.81
= 3.201 x 10-3m
= 0.2132 m
DISCUSSION
12
From the result obtained through this experiment, it is been observed that when the
pressure difference increase, the flow rates of the water increase and thus the velocities also
increase for both convergent and divergent flow. For the convergent flow, the flow rate is
6.19 x 10-5 m3/s when the pressure difference is 50mm, 9.26 x 10-5 m3/s when the pressure
difference is 100mm and 1.23 x 10-4 m3/s when the pressure difference is 150mm.
Meanwhile, for the divergent flow, the flow rate is 9.80 x 10-5 m3/s when the pressure
difference is 50mm, 1.270 x 10-4 m3/s when the pressure difference is 100mm and 1.50 x 10-4
m3/s when the pressure difference is 150mm. Other than that, the result also show that the
time taken for 3L water to be collected become faster from 50mm to 150mm pressure
difference for both convergent and divergent flow.
For convergent flow, the total head is 0.1658m (h1), 0.1635m (h2), 0.1613m (h3),
0.1542m (h4) and 0.1467m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1918m (h1), 0.1840m (h2),
0.1815m (h3), 0.1741m (h4) and 0.1610m (h5) for 100mm pressure difference and 0.2132m
(h1), 0.2135m (h2), 0.2094m (h3), 0.2004m (h4) and 0.1851m (h5) for 150 mm pressure
difference. The result show a rise at each manometer tubes when the pressure difference
increases.
For divergent flow, the total head is 0.1520m (h1), 0.1463m (h2), 0.1459m (h3),
0.1606m (h4) and 0.1787m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1684m (h1), 0.1607m (h2),
0.1387m (h3), 0.1668m (h4) and 0.1984m (h5) for 100mm pressure difference and 0.1798m
(h1), 0.1649m (h2), 0.1408m (h3), 0.1670m (h4) and 0.2111m (h5) for 150mm pressure
difference. The results also show the reading of each manometer tubes increase when the
pressure difference increases.
From this experiment, it is found that the total head pressure increase for convergent
and divergent flow for each manometer tube readings. Therefore, it can be concluded that the
Bernoulli’s equation is valid when applied to steady flow of water in tapered duct and
absolute velocity values increase along the same channel.
Although the experiment proof that the Bernoulli’s equation is valid for both flow but
the values obtain might be slightly differ from the actual value. This is because there is some
error maybe happen during the experiment is done. While taking the reading of the
manometer, there might be possibility that the eye position of the readers is not parallel to the
scale. Thus, this error will contribute to the different in the values obtained. Other than that,
the readers must take the accurate reading from the manometers. In order to get the accurate
13
value, the water level must be let to be really stable. Thus, a patient is needed in order to run
this experiment successfully because sometimes the way the experiment is conduct may
influence the result of the experiment.
CONCLUSION
For convergent flow, the total head is 0.1658m (h1), 0.1635m (h2), 0.1613m (h3),
0.1542m (h4) and 0.1467m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1918m (h1), 0.1840m (h2),
0.1815m (h3), 0.1741m (h4) and 0.1610m (h5) for 100mm pressure difference and 0.2132m
(h1), 0.2135m (h2), 0.2094m (h3), 0.2004m (h4) and 0.1851m (h5) for 150 mm pressure
difference. Meanwhile, for divergent flow, the total head is 0.1520m (h1), 0.1463m (h2),
0.1459m (h3), 0.1606m (h4) and 0.1787m (h5) for 50mm pressure difference, 0.1684m (h1),
0.1607m (h2), 0.1387m (h3), 0.1668m (h4) and 0.1984m (h5) for 100mm pressure difference
and 0.1798m (h1), 0.1649m (h2), 0.1408m (h3), 0.1670m (h4) and 0.2111m (h5) for 150mm
pressure difference. The results show the reading of each manometer tubes increase when the
pressure difference increases.
From the result obtained, we can conclude that the Bernoulli’s equation is valid for
convergent and divergent flow as both of it does obey the equation. For both flow, as the
pressure difference increase, the time taken for 3L water collected increase and the flow rates
of the water also increase. Thus, as the velocity of the same channel increase, the total head
pressure also increase for both convergent and divergent flow.
14
RECOMMENDATION
1. Repeat the experiment for several times to get the average values in order to get more
accurate results.
2. Make sure the trap bubbles must be removing first before start running the
experiment.
3. The eye position of the observer must be parallel to the water meniscus when taking
the reading at the manometers to avoid parallax error.
4. The valve must be control carefully to maintain the constant values of the pressure
difference as it is quite difficult to control.
5. The time keeper must be alert with the rising of water volume to avoid error and must
be only a person who taking the time.
15
REFERENCES
16
APPENDICES
17
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
18
Figure 6
Figure 7
19