Fitnatul Wahabbiyah
Fitnatul Wahabbiyah
Fitnatul Wahabbiyah
com
Introduction
During the reign of Sultan Salim III (1204-1222 AH) many tribulations took place. One was
the tribulation of the Wahhabiyyah which started in the area of al-Hijaz (1) where they
captured al-Haramayn (2), and prevented Muslims coming from ash-Sham (3)
and Egypt from reaching their destination to perform Pilgrimage (Hajj). Another tribulation
is that of the French who controlled Egypt from 1213 A.H. until 1216 A.H. Let us here speak
briefly about the two adversities (4), because each was mentioned in detail in the books of
history and in separate treatises.
In an effort to give credibility to his innovations Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab embellished his sayings
by quotations which he selected from Islamic sources, i.e., quotations which are used as
proofs for many issues but not the issues which Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab was attempting to
support. He brought false statements and tried to beautify them for the laymen until they
followed him. He wrote treatises for them until they believed that most of the People of
Tawhid (7) were blasphemers.
The matter of Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab started to evidence itself in 1143 A.H. and began
spreading after 1150 A.H. Subsequently, the scholars--even his brother, Shaykh Sulayman
and the rest of his shaykhs-- authored many treatises to refute him. But Muhammad Ibn
Su'ud, the Prince of ad-Dar'iyyah in eastern Arabia, supported him and worked to spread his
ideology. Ibn Su'ud was from Banu Hanifah, the people of Musaylimah al-Kadhdhab (9).
When Muhammad Ibn Su'ud died, his son 'Abdul-'Aziz Ibn Muhammad Ibn Su'ud took over
the responsibility of fulfilling the vile task of spreading the Wahhabi beliefs.
Many of the shaykhs of Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab in Medina used to say, "He will be misguided,
and he will misguide those for whom Allah willed the misguidance." Things took place as per
The verses in the Qur'an similar to these ones are numerous. Muhammad Ibn 'Abdul-
Wahhab gravely misinterpreted the previously cited verses and said: "The Muslim who asks
help from the Prophet, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, other prophets, or the righteous people
(salihun), or who calls or asks any of them for intercession is like those blasphemers
mentioned in the Qur'an." According to the false claim of Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab, the Muslims
who do these things are blasphemers.
He also considered visiting the grave of Prophet Muhammad and the graves of other
prophets and righteous Muslims for blessings as blasphemy. Allah revealed Ayah 3 of Surat
az-Zumar in reference to the mushrikun:
This verse means: [Those who worship the idols said: "We do not worship them except to
achieve a higher status from Allah."]
Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab falsely stated: "Those who perform tawassul (asking Allah by the
prophets, for example) are similar to those blasphemers mentioned in Surat az-Zumar, Ayah
3, who claim they do not worship the idols except to achieve a higher status from Allah." He
said: "The blasphemers did not believe the idols create anything; they believed Allah is the
Creator." He gave his version of proof from the Qur'an by citing Surat Luqman, Ayah 25
and Surat az-Zumar, Ayah 38, in which Allah said:
These verses mean: [If you ask them, `Who created the heavens and earth?' They will say,
`Allah'.]
The blasphemers intended in these verses believed their idols deserved Godhood. They
exalted them as one would exalt his Creator, even though they believed the idols did not
create the heavens and the earth. The believers, on the other hand, do not believe the
prophets or righteous Muslims (awliya') deserve to be worshipped, nor do they deserve to
be attributed with Godhood, nor do they exalt them as one would exalt God. They believe
these people are good slaves of Allah, His beloved ones whom He chose, and by their
blessings (barakah) Allah grants His mercy to His creation. Hence, when the slaves of Allah
seek the blessings (barakah) of the prophets and righteous Muslims (awliya') they are
seeking these blessings as a mercy from Allah.
There are many proofs and examples from the Qur'an and Sunnah about this basic belief of
the Muslims. Muslims believe Allah is the Creator, the One Who grants benefit and inflicts
harm, and the only One Who deserves to be worshipped. Muslims believe that no one other
than Allah has the power to affect the creation. The prophets and righteous people do not
create anything. They do not possess the power to bestow benefit or inflict harm on others,
but Allah is the One Who bestows the mercy upon the slaves by the righteous Muslims'
blessings.
Hence, the belief of the blasphemers, i.e., the belief their idols deserve to be worshipped
and have Godhood, is what makes them fall into blasphemy. This saying of the blasphemers,
as previously cited in Surat az-Zumar, Ayah 3, was said in an effort to justify their belief
when they were disproved and shown idols do not deserve to be worshipped.
How can Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab and those who follow him find it permissible to equate the
believers, who believed in tawhid, to those blasphemers, who believed in the Godhood of
the idols? All the previously cited verses and the verses which are similar to them are
specific to the blasphemers who associate partners with Allah--none of the believers are
included.
Al-Bukhariyy narrated by the route of Ibn 'Umar, may Allah raise their ranks, that the
Prophet, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, described the Khawarij as those who took the verses
revealed about the blasphemers and attributed them to the believers! In the narration by
the route of Ibn 'Umar the Prophet said:
which means: "What I fear most for my nation is a man who mis-explains the Qur'an and
takes it out of context." This hadith and the previous one apply very well to the Wahhabis.
If performing tawassul had been blasphemy, then the believers, i.e., the
Holy Nabi, Sall Allahu alaihi wa Aalihi wa Sallim, his Companions, and the Salaf and Khalaf of
this nation would not have done it. Yet it is mentioned in the sahih hadith of the
Holy Nabi that the Holy Nabiused to ask Allah by saying:
There is a hadith related by al-Hakim that mentions after Adam ate from the tree, he
performedtawassul by our Holy Nabi, Sall Allahu alaihi wa Aalihi wa Sallim. He did that,
because he saw the name of the Holy Nabi written on the 'Arsh, Adam said: <<O Allah, by
the dignity of this son [Muhammad], forgive this father [Adam].>>
It was also related by Ibn Hibban, that upon the death of Fatimah Bint Asad, may Allah raise
her rank, the Holy Nabi, Sall Allahu alaihi wa Aalihi wa Sallim, with his own honorable hands,
put her in her grave and said: <<O Allah, forgive my mother{11}, Fatimah Bint Asad, and
widen her place by the status of Your Holy Nabi and the prophets who came before me.
You are the most Merciful.>>
"O Allah, I ask You and direct myself to You by Your Holy Nabi, Muhammad, the Prophet of
Mercy. O Muhammad, I ask Allah by you to fulfill my need. O Allah, enable him to intercede
for me."
'Umar Ibn al-Khattab performed the tawassul by al-'Abbas (the uncle of the Holy Nabi), may
Allah reward their deeds, when he prayed the Salah of ’Istisqa’{14} with the people. There
are other proofs mentioned in the books of the Islamic scholars but we will not recount
them at length here.
The one who pursues the saying of the Companions and their followers will find a great deal
of proof about the validity of calling the prophet by saying "O Muhammad" in his presence
as well as in his absence and in his life as well as after his death. In fact, many texts include
the phrase which means, "O Muhammad". Calling the name of the
Holy Nabi, Sall Allahu alaihi wa Aalihi waSallim, is permissible. An example is the saying of
the Companion, Bilal Ibn al-Harith, may Allah reward his deeds, when he went to the grave
of the Holy Nabi. He said: "O Messenger of Allah, ask Allah to send rain to your Nation." His
saying contains this format{15}.
Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Sulayman al-Kurdiyy{16} was among the authors who wrote
refutingIbn 'Abdul-Wahhab. He was Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab’s own shaykh. Among what he said
is as follows:
O Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab, I advise you, for the sake of Allah, ta'ala, to hold your tongue
regarding the Muslims. If you hear from anyone who asks for help from other than Allah
that one has the power to effect things without the Will of Allah, then teach him the right
thing about this issue, and show him the proofs which state no one other than Allah brings
things from non-existence into existence. The one who rejects that is blasphemous. You
have no right to label the majority of the Muslims as blasphemers{17} while you are deviant
from the majority of the Muslims. In fact, it is more reasonable to consider the one who
deviates from the majority of the Muslims as a blasphemer then to consider the Muslims as
a nation as blasphemers--because the deviant one has followed a path other than the path
of the believers. In Suratan-Nisa’, Ayah 115, Allah said:
ب ۃ ف ل ت ز ا ف ل نا ۃ ف ال ب ا ض ک م ح ہللا ع با ع ن
which means: <<If the animal of anyone of you went out of control in the wilderness, then
call: ‘O slaves of Allah, help me’>>, since there are slaves of Allah [i.e. the angels] who will
respond to him.
There is another hadith related by al-Bazzar in which the Holy Nabi said:
When traveling at nightfall the Holy Nabi, sallallahu 'alyhi wa sallam, used to say:
ب ی ض ا ہللا ب ک
which means: << O earth, my Lord and your Lord is Allah.>>
When the Holy Nabi visited the grave of Muslims, he used to say:
There is no harm in calling on and performing tawassul by someone unless one believes that
someone other than Allah actually creates things. Hence, as long as one believes that only
The general proofs mentioned in this summary are enough to refute Ibn'Abdul-Wahhab.
The scholars of Islam have expounded on this issue in several treatises.
After evaluating their beliefs and finding them full of many types of blasphemy, the
Wahhabis fled like frightened zebras fleeing from a lion. Hence, after establishing the
proofs, the scholars wrote an attestation against the Wahhabiyyah to the Head Judge of
Makkah confirming the Wahhabis as blasphemous because of their beliefs. The aim of the
scholars was to disclose the misguidance of the Wahhabis and make it known to the
Muslims near and far. This action took place during the rulership of Sharif Mas'ud Ibn Sa'id
Ibn Sa'd Ibn Zayn, the ruler of Hijaz who ordered the imprisonment of those unjust
Wahhabis. Sharif Mas'ud Ibn Sa'id Ibn Sa'd Ibn Zayn died in 1165 A.H.
Some Wahhabis managed to escape their imprisonment. They went to ad-Dar'iyyah and
In 1217 A.H., they marched with big armies to the area of at-Ta’if. In Dhul-Qa'dah (19) of the
same year, they lay siege to the area the Muslims were, subdued them, and killed the
people: men, women, and children. They also looted the Muslims’ belongings and
possessions. Only a few people escaped their barbarism.
After at-Ta’if came under their control, the Wahhabis planned to march towards Makkah,
but this was during the time the Muslims were performing Pilgrimage, and many of the
Muslims from ash-Sham and Egypt were in Makkah. The Wahhabis knew if they attacked
Makkah at that time all the people performing Pilgrimage would join in fighting them. They
stayed in at-Ta’if until Hajj was over, and the people had returned to their countries. Then
the Wahhabis and their armies set out to attack Makkah. Sharif Ghalib did not have enough
power to face these armies, so he went to Juddah. The people of Makkah were afraid the
Wahhabis would treat them in the same manner the people of at-Ta’if were treated, so they
negotiated and surrendered to them. The Wahhabis granted the people of Makkah security
and entered Makkah on the eighth of Muharram, 1218 A.H. They occupied themselves there
for fourteen days ordering the Muslims to repent and embrace Islam--since the Wahhabis
falsely claimed them as blasphemers. The people were prohibited from doing what the
Wahhabis incorrectly believed to be blasphemy, like performing tawassul and visiting the
graves.
Having gained control of at-Ta’if and Makkah, the Wahhabis turned their armies towards
Juddah to fight Sharif Ghalib. When they surrounded Juddah, Sharif Ghalib bombarded them
with cannons and projectiles. He killed many Wahhabis and prevented the conquering of
Juddah. After eight days, the Wahhabis departed Juddah to return to their own territories.
The Wahhabis left some of their army in Makkah and appointed 'Abdul-Mu'in, the brother
of Sharif Ghalib, as prince. 'Abdul-Mu'in only accepted this position to protect the people of
Makkah and shelter them from the evil mistreatment of the harmful Wahhabis.
Sharif Ghalib was compelled to ask for reconciliation with the Wahhabis. He accepted for
some people to arbitrate between them. He signed an agreement with conditions
stipulating the rulership of Makkah would be kept for him, and the people of Makkah would
be treated leniently. The Wahhabis accepted these conditions. They entered Makkah by the
end of Dhul-Qa'dah in 1220 A.H. They also gained control of al-Madinah. They plundered
what was in the room of the Nabi, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, took all the money that was
there, and did some disgraceful acts. They appointed a man among them, Mubarak Ibn
Madyan, as the governor of al-Madinah.
The Wahhabis ruled Makkah and al-Madinah for seven years. During these years, they
prevented the people of ash-Sham and Egypt from entering Makkah carrying the cloak (21)
of the Ka'bah when they came to perform pilgrimage. The Wahhabis started to make the
cloak for the Ka'bah from black material. They prevented the people from smoking tobacco.
When they found someone smoking they punished him fiercely. During this time, the
Wahhabis destroyed the domes built on the graves of the righteous Muslims.
Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha organized a big army and by a mandate from the Sultan, appointed
his son, Tusun Basha, as its commanding officer. Those troops left Egypt in Ramadan of the
same year and journeyed by land and by sea until they reached Yanbu' and regained it form
the Wahhabis. In Dhul-Hijjah 1226 AH, the army reached an area between as-Safra’ and al-
Hadidah. A fierce fight broke out with the Bedouins who were in al-Harbiyyah. These tribes
were loyal to the Wahhabis, and many other tribes also joined them. As a result, the
Egyptian army was badly defeated, many of the soldiers were massacred, and all the
belongings of the army were looted. A small number of this army made their way back to
Egypt.
In 1227 A.H., Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha was determined to lead the army to al-Hijaz himself,
so he mobilized more troops. In the month of Sha'ban some ranks of the army were sent
before him--at the peak of their strength and preparedness. Among their artillery were
eighteen canons. In Ramadan, the army captured what the Wahhabis formerly controlled
and regained the area of as-Safra’, al-Hadidah, and other places without a fight, i.e., by
attracting the shaykhs of the Bedouin tribes to their side. Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha gave
money to the leaders of these tribes and salaries were arranged for them. These
arrangements were made under the management of Sharif Ghalib, the Sharif of Makkah,
who fooled the Wahhabis into believing he was on their side. The first time the Egyptians
were defeated, they had not consulted with Sharif Ghalib--so he was unaware of their need
for a similar arrangement.
Around the end of Dhul-Qa'dah, the army entered al-Madinah. When the news about the
victory of the Muslim army reached Egypt, the Muslims celebrated the event for three days.
They decorated the city, displayed fireworks, and fired their guns in celebration. They
conveyed this good news to all the Christian kings.
The army traveling by sea captured Juddah at the beginning of Muharram, 1228 A.H., and
then headed towards Makkah to regain control. The army did not engage in any battles with
the Wahhabis as a result of the secret arrangements the Sharif managed to achieve. When
the army reached Juddah, the Wahhabiyy army and princes fled Makkah. Al-Madayiqiyy, the
Wahhabi princes of at-Ta’if, and their army fled at-Ta’if when they got word the Muslim
army regained control of Juddah and Makkah.
In Shawwal, 1228 A.H., before Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha left Egypt for al-Hijaz, Sharif Ghalib
caught 'Uthman al-Madayiqiyy, the Wahhabi governor of at-Ta’if, who was one of their
greatest agents and rulers. He was placed in iron chains and sent to Egypt. He arrived in
Egypt in Dhul-Qa'dah--after Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha left for al-Hijaz. From Egypt, 'Uthman
al-Madayiqiyy was sent to the capital of the state--where later he was killed.
In Muharram, 1229 A.H., Mubarak Ibn Madyan, the Wahhabi governor of al-Madinah was
sent to the capital. He was carried around Constantinople in a disgraceful manner for the
people to see. He was killed after this, and his head was hung on the gate of the
government building. The same thing was done to 'Uthman al-Madayiqiyy as a punishment
for all the crimes they committed during their rulership.
Sharif Ghalib was sent to Salonika (22), held in high regard, and treated well until he died in
1231 A.H. He was buried there, and a dome was constructed over his grave--and to this day,
the people still visit his grave. Sharif Ghalib’s rulership over Makkah lasted for twenty-six
years.
Shortly before the time of Pilgrimage, Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha left these areas and
departed for Makkah. He performed Hajj and stayed in Makkah until Rajab, 1230 A.H.
Muhammad 'Aliyy Basha left Hasan Basha (23) in Makkah and returned to Egypt in the
middle of Rajab, 1230 A.H. He had spent one year and seven months residing in al-Hijaz,
because he would not go back to Egypt until he had arranged the affairs of al-Hijaz and
destroyed the Wahhabi factions spread throughout the Bedouin tribes of al-Hijaz and
Eastern Arabia.
When Egypt received news of the victory, the people were extremely triumphant and
rejoiced for seven days. They set off fireworks and fired 1,000 canons in celebration of this
great event.
Al-Basha ordered a robe (26) to be put on Ibn Su'ud before he left to the house of Isma'il
Basha in Bulaq (27). Abdullah Ibn Su'ud had a small metal box with him.
Al-Basha ordered the box to be opened. They found three Mushafs in it--the like of which no
one had ever seen--and with them were 300 large pearls, one large emerald, and a golden
ribbon.
Then 'Abdullah Ibn Su'ud was sent to the place of the Sultan. In Muharram, 1235 A.H.,
Ibrahim Basha returned to Egypt from al-Hijaz after he destroyed ad-Dar'iyyah such that it
Conclusion
This is a very brief summary of the story of Muhammad Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab. To talk at
length on each of these details would be very lengthy. The tribulations inflicted by the
Wahhabis were a calamity for the Muslims. The Wahhabis shed a great deal of blood and
robbed a great deal of money; their harm was prevalent and their evil spread.
Many of the hadiths of the Nabi, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, spoke explicitly about this
tribulation. One narration said:
which means: <<There will be people who come from the eastern side of Arabia who will
recite Qur’an, but their recitation will not pass beyond their collarbones (28). They will go out
of Islam as swiftly as the arrow goes through the prey. Their sign is shaving their heads.>>
This hadith was mentioned in many narrations, including Sahih-ul-Bukhariyy and other
books of hadith. There is no need to expound on listing these narrations or their narrators
because they are well-known and of the sahih (29) classification.
The Nabi said: "Their sign is shaving their heads." This is an explicit reference to the
Wahhabi sect. They used to order all those who follow them to shave their heads. None of
the previous sects, i.e., those who came before the Wahhabis, like the Khawarij or other
innovators, had this sign.
As-Sayyid 'Abdur-Rahman al-Ahdal, the Mufti of Zabid, used to say: "There is no need for
writing against the Wahhabis. For, in refuting them, it is sufficient to mention the hadith of
the Nabi, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam: <<Their sign is shaving their heads>> since no other
innovators had ever done it."
It happened once that a women made her point against Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab when they
compelled her to follow them and she did. He ordered her to shave her head. She told him:
"Since you order the woman to shave her head, you have to order the man to shave his
beard. The hair of the women is her decoration and the decoration of the man is his beard."
Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab could not answer her.
Among of what the Wahhabis used to do was to prevent the people from asking the Nabi,
sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, for his intercession--although the hadiths about the Nabi’s
intercession are numerous and are of the mutawatir (30) classification. Most of his
intercession is for the Muslims of his nation who committed major sins. The Wahhabis also
prohibited Muslims from reading Dala’il-ul-Khayrat--which includes saying as-Salat on the
Nabi and mentioning many of the Nabi’s complete descriptions. They said this is blasphemy.
They also prevented Muslims from saying as-Salat on the Nabi on the minarets after the
Adhan. Once a righteous blind Muslim was calling Adhan and said as-Salat on the Nabi after
the Adhan (31). The Wahhabis brought him to Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhab who ordered his
execution.