The BESRA and Education For All: by Ron S. Trimillos
The BESRA and Education For All: by Ron S. Trimillos
The BESRA and Education For All: by Ron S. Trimillos
by
RON S. TRIMILLOS
March 5, 2011
The The BESRA is an acronym which
stands for Basic Education
B Sector Reform Agenda.
It is a package of policy reforms
E
pursued by the DepEd to build
S upon the efforts of the School
First Initiative (SFI) and to
R create a basic education sector
that is capable of achieving
A
Education For All (EFA)
objectives by 2015.
DepEd is pursuing a package of policy reforms that as a whole
seeks to systematically improve critical regulatory,
institutional, structural, financial, cultural, physical and
informational conditions affecting basic education provision,
access and delivery on the ground.
These policy reforms are
expected to create critical
changes necessary to
further accelerate,
broaden, deepen and
sustain the improved
education effort already
being started by the
Schools First Initiative.
OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF BESRA
Info Bits:
The Education For All is a from Jomtien to Dakar
movement which took off at
Year 1990
the World Conference on
Education for All in 1990. Since 155 countries
then, governments, non- 150 organizations
governmental organizations, Year 2000
civil society, bilateral and World Declaration on
multilateral donor agencies Education For All
and the media have taken Mid-Decade Conference
up the cause of providing
Amman, Jordan
basic education for all
children, youth and adults. The World Education Forum
2000
Its culmination adopted the Dakar Framework for Action
Education for All: Meeting Our Collective
Commitments. This document commits governments to
achieving quality basic education for all by 2015, with
particular emphasis on girls' schooling and a pledge
from donor countries and institutions that "no country
seriously committed to basic education will be thwarted
in the achievement of this goal by lack of resources”.
The biggest review on education in history, The Dakar
Framework for Action, draws on the results of the global
EFA Assessment 2000. This global exercise was the
most comprehensive study ever made of basic
education.
Preliminary results were debated at five regional preparatory
conferences and a special gathering of the nine high-
population countries (E9) between December 1999 and
February 2000 (in Johannesburg, South Africa; Bangkok,
Thailand; Cairo, Egypt; Recife, Brazil; Warsaw, Poland;
and Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic). National
assessments were complemented by fourteen thematic
studies on educational issues of global concern, surveys
on learning achievement and the conditions of teaching
and learning, as well as twenty case-studies.
The findings: The assessment revealed a mixed scorecard.
1. The number of children in school soared (from 599m
in 1990 to 681m in 1998) and many countries were
approaching full primary school enrolment for the first
time.
2. However, some 113 million children were out of
school, discrimination against girls was widespread and
nearly a billion adults – mostly women – were illiterate.
3. The lack of qualified teachers and learning materials
was the reality for too many schools.
4. The donor community was criticized for dwindling
aid commitment.
The findings: The assessment revealed a mixed scorecard.
5. Disparities in quality were also widespread.
6. Over-conservative systems were out of touch with
young people’s needs, in sharp contrast with the plethora
of initiatives that successfully adapted learning to local
needs or reached out to marginalized populations.
7. For some African countries, education absorbs up to a
third of the national budget, although several of them
spend as much on debt repayment as on health and basic
education combined.
8. New media and virtual networks had also started to
shake the dust off education systems.
Looking ahead. There are daunting challenges ahead:
1. How to reach out with education to HIV/AIDS orphans in
regions such as Africa where the pandemic is wreaking havoc;
2. How to offer education to the ever-increasing number of
refugees and displaced people;
3. How to help teachers acquire a new understanding of their
role and how to harness the new technologies to benefit the
poor, and;
4. And probably the most daunting challenge of all – in a
world with 700 million people living in forty-two highly
indebted countries – how to help education overcome poverty
and give millions of children a chance to realize their full
potential.
Education For All is a global movement led by
UNESCO, aiming to meet the learning needs
of all children, youth and adults by 2015.
UNESCO has been mandated to lead the
movement and coordinate the international
efforts to reach Education for All.
Governments, development agencies, civil
society, non-government organizations and the
media are but some of the partners working
toward reaching these goals.
Why is EFA Important?
Lifelong Learning
Lifelong learning is a learning progression
beginning at birth and ending only with death
which encompasses both the formal and
alternative learning systems. Together with the
UNESCO advocated concept of life skills, the
Philippine notion of functional literacy now
approximates the idea of “real life literacy.”
POLICIES, PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS TO ACHIEVE EFA TARGETS
In summary, the country was not able to attain its 2005
targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early
Childhood Education, Formal Basic Education and
Alternative Learning System. Most of the regions have
performance classified as “falling further behind” or
with performance lower than the national level in 2002
and continued to decline in 2005. While substantial
investments were poured into the establishment of basic
education
POLICIES, PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS TO ACHIEVE EFA TARGETS
While there are pockets of excellence in some areas, the
overall performance of the country is declining and
disparity among regions, against learners in rural
schools (especially in terms of access and completion)
and against male children is widening. For the country
to achieve its targets in 2010 and move ahead towards
attaining its 2015 targets, the various basic education
stakeholders should focus their efforts and resources in
assisting the regions, divisions, schools or groups of
learners who are lagging behind in key outcome
indicators.