This document discusses optimizing the 3D seismic design for the Pardis project using a genetic algorithm. It analyzed four operational parameters for a 3D seismic survey that could provide high quality data at lowest cost depending on study type. The Pardis 3D seismic project area was estimated to be around 1120 square kilometers for full coverage. The study aimed to optimize design parameters affecting cost using a novel genetic algorithm approach for 3D seismic design optimization.
This document discusses optimizing the 3D seismic design for the Pardis project using a genetic algorithm. It analyzed four operational parameters for a 3D seismic survey that could provide high quality data at lowest cost depending on study type. The Pardis 3D seismic project area was estimated to be around 1120 square kilometers for full coverage. The study aimed to optimize design parameters affecting cost using a novel genetic algorithm approach for 3D seismic design optimization.
This document discusses optimizing the 3D seismic design for the Pardis project using a genetic algorithm. It analyzed four operational parameters for a 3D seismic survey that could provide high quality data at lowest cost depending on study type. The Pardis 3D seismic project area was estimated to be around 1120 square kilometers for full coverage. The study aimed to optimize design parameters affecting cost using a novel genetic algorithm approach for 3D seismic design optimization.
This document discusses optimizing the 3D seismic design for the Pardis project using a genetic algorithm. It analyzed four operational parameters for a 3D seismic survey that could provide high quality data at lowest cost depending on study type. The Pardis 3D seismic project area was estimated to be around 1120 square kilometers for full coverage. The study aimed to optimize design parameters affecting cost using a novel genetic algorithm approach for 3D seismic design optimization.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8
/ / 83 1390
- . .
.
. .
.
2 1120 ] .[10
.
.
. -1
.
. -1-1
. Shot lines Crossline direction
by SI
X max
SLI
bx
Receiver Lines
RLI RI
Box
X min
Inline direction
:RI 1 :RLI :bx :SI :SLI :by ][2
63
] .[2
.
. .
.
4 .
.
. 5
].[8
-2
.
].[5 3
-1-2
North Lat
East Long
2 ][10
output or cost
function or process
intput or variables
3 ][5
64
: 6 7 . 8 : .
. 9 ].[9 : 10 )( .
)(
)( ].[8 : . 11 16 . : . 12 .
].[8
. - 13.
/ / 83 1390
-2-2
. : : .
].[8 :
].[8 : )( ].[8 :
].[8 4 .
15
) (
) (
-3
14 -
. .
RI SI nr ns NRL NSL RLI SLI Ifold Xfold Fold SD NC Xr Xs Xmax Xmin AR
2 ][4
)0/5 (NSL - 1
Ifold
0/5 NRL
Xfold
0/25 (NSL - 1) NRL
Fold SD
best individuals
yes
Are optimization ?criteria met
evaluate objective function
generate initial population
nr (NSL - 1) NRL
NC
0/5 (NSL - 1) nr RI
Xr
0/5 (NSL - 1) ns SI
Xs
Recombination
[(0.5 (NSL - 1) nr RI) + (0.5 NRL ns SI)2] 1/2
Xmax
Mutation
[(RLI - 0.5 SI)2 + (SLI - 0.5 RI)2] 1/2
Xmin
no result
start Selection
generate new population
4 ].[9
AR
65
. (1) : - ) (2 .
].[1 -1-3
] .[9
. -2-3 -
.
. 16 6 ) ( 4 . (24)6 . 3 . 3 64 .
.
] .[7
.
1 . . ).(2 -4-3 -
-3-3 . . ) ( ) ( . . : 2 ) (x X 1 Objective Function = w i i xi
Population Generation 10 Recombination or Crossover 11 Encoding 12 Fitness Value 13 Sequential GA-Generational
ramin.hosseinidokht@gmail.com Full fold 3 Evolutionary Computation 4 Simulate Annealing 5 Fixed-length bit string 6 Chromosome 7 Individual
Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons.
[6] Lansley, R.M., 2004, CMP fold: A Meaningless Number? The Leading Edge, October, 1038-1041. [7] Liner, C.L., Underwood, W.D., and Gobeli, R., 1999, 3-D Seismic Survey Design as an Optimization Problem, the Leading Edge, 18, 1054-1060. [8] Sivanandam, S.N., Deepa, S.N., 2008, Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Springer. [9] Sumathi, S., Hamsapriya, T., Surekha, P., 2008, Evolutionary Intelligence-An Introduction to Theory and Applications with MATLAB, Springer.
.
70
[1] Alvarez, G., 2002, Can We Make Genetic Algorithms Work in High-Dimensionality Problems?: SEP-112,. [2] Chaouch, A., and Mari, J.L., 2006, 3-D Land Seismic Surveys: Denition of Geophysical Parameters, Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev., Vol. 61, No. 5, 611-630. [3] Cooper, N., 2004, A World of RealityDesigning Land 3D Programs for Signal, Noise, and Prestack Migration, The Leading Edge, October, 1007-1014. [4] Cordsen, A., Galbraith, M., and Peirce, J., 2000, Planning land 3-D Seismic Surveys, Soc. Expl. Geophys. [5] Haupt, R.L., Haupt, S.E., 2004, Practical Genetic
