Indian Pharmaceutical Sector
Indian Pharmaceutical Sector
Indian Pharmaceutical Sector
Growth drivers strengthen in the near term; Patent expiries in the U.S. & Europe and domestic market are key
ICRA RATING FEATURE Industry Update March 2012
Summary
After a brief period of sluggishness, the growth momentum in the domestic formulations market appears to be back on track Structural demand drivers including a) rising household income levels, b) increasing prevalence of lifestyle related diseases, c) improving healthcare infrastructure/delivery systems and 4) rising penetration in smaller towns and rural areas continue to support long-term growth However, competitive pressures in the domestic market are likely to sustain as MNCs become aggressive and domestic companies leverage on their expanded field force; potential regulatory interventions could hurt pricing A large number of patent expirations continue to offer strong growth prospects for generic players in the developed markets; In the recent quarters, a peer set of seven leading generic players have reported a fairly strong revenue growth in the US driven by steadily expanding product portfolio and exclusivities While patent expires are expected to peak out in 2012, we believe that the growth momentum would sustain as most of Indian companies have a fairly well spread out product pipeline till 2014. While some companies have a healthy pipeline of FTF opportunities, others are likely to benefit from the launch of niche, limited competition products The quality of the filings by major Indian companies has also significantly improved over the years with complex molecules, non-orals (i.e. inhalers, injectables, oral contraceptive, ophthalmic etc.) and Para IV/FTFs forming increasing share of their pipeline Globally, generics players however continue to face competitive environment with increasingly crowded space for filing ANDAs and Para IV challenges and aggressive product life cycle management strategies by large innovator companies Price erosion, especially through regulatory interventions, remains a foremost challenge in the European markets; presence in limited competition product segments and over-the-counter (OTCs) segment offers some protection to margins. Most developed markets continue to move away from branded generics to commoditized un-branded generics and lower margin tender based business; amongst new frontiers Japanese generic market offers large potential, though there are significant challenges Patent expirations, weak pipeline quality and increasing focus by Governments to reduce healthcare costs continue to exert pressure on innovator companies which supports outsourcing to low-cost nations Despite challenges, leading Indian players continue to exhibit strong profitability indicators (excluding one-time instances like exclusivity-related aberrations or impact of foreign exchange fluctuations) and credit metrics. These strengths are also reflected in their strong credit profile Our outlook on the Indian pharmaceutical companies remains favourable as we believe companies will continue to benefit from recovery in the domestic market, strong growth potential in generics developed markets and potential outsourcing opportunities Overall, investments including capital expenditure are likely to remain buoyant over the medium term. Balance sheets of major pharmaceutical companies remain strong providing adequate room for fund raising
Corporate Ratings
An jan G h o sh +9 1 22 3 04 7 00 06
aghosh@icraindia.com
Su b r ata Ray +9 1 22 3 04 7 00 27
subrata@icraindia.com
Sh a m sh er D e wan +9 1 12 4 45 45 3 28
shamsherd@icraindia.com
Kin j al Sh ah +9 1 22 3 04 7 00 54
kinjal.shah@icraindia.com
Kh u sh b o o S h ah an i +9 1 22 3 04 8 10 70
khushboo.Shahani@icraindia.com
ICRA LIMITED
Domestic Formulations Business: Growth momentum improves; therapy-mix influences growth rates among companies
Exhibit 1: Trend in Domestic Formulations Revenues* & Growth
4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 20.8% 9.7% 13.9% 16.6% 9.1% 13.1% 25% 20% 15% 10%
17.4%
5% 0% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Domestic Formulations Sales (Rs. Crore) Change (%) YoY
Despite increasing consolidation, the market continues to remain highly fragmented with top ten Industry wide slowdown in the anti-infective segment continued to pharmaceutical companies accounting for only ~35-40% of the market. Leading players continue impact growth in the domestic market; however some recovery in to maintain their market share owing to their strong distribution reach, strong field force and slew of product launches. growth is visible;
consumer healthcare business continues to do well Lupin Domestic formulations business grew by 192% during Q3 FY12 driven by growth across therapeutic segments Sun Pharma Driven by higher share of chronics in India, business continued to grow steadily with a growth of 14% in Q3 FY12 Dr. Reddys There are initial signs of recovery; secondary sales trends have been encouraging Source: Company Earnings Call; ICRA
ICRA LIMITED
Domestic Formulations Business: MNCs are becoming aggressive; competitive pressures are likely to sustain
Exhibit 3: Trend in Revenues growth of MNCs in the Indian market
7,000.0
6,000.0
Increasing investments by MNCs reflect at their renewed interest in the Indian market
30.0% 25.0%
5,000.0 4,000.0
3,000.0
18.0%
15.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0% 5.0%
2,000.0
1,000.0
The MNC pharma companies which have so far lagged the domestic market growth are now becoming increasingly aggressive in the Indian market as part of their focus on emerging markets. In the past, most of MNCs players had maintained a subdued profile in India owing to limitation on launch of patented products, limited marketing and distribution bandwidth and relatively small scale offered by the Indian market. However, with the implementation of the product patent regime and strong growth prospects, the landscape for MNCs pharmaceutical companies is gradually changing. Series of major acquisitions, steady growth in new product introductions (especially in the branded segment with steep pricing difference to global prices) and expansion in field force clearly indicates at their renewed interest in the Indian market. Apart from acquisitions, which have so far been their preferred route for consolidating position in India, companies have also been targeting growth opportunities through in-licensing deals with domestic generic players both for domestic as well other emerging markets. Such alliances primarily aim at leveraging on the lower R&D cost (i.e. product/market authorizations) and manufacturing capabilities of the local generic companies on one hand and the extensive marketing & distribution footprint of MNCs in other markets on the other. With increasing focus of MNC Pharma on emerging markets and limited growth opportunities in developed markets owing to large patent expiries and sluggish replacement of patented products, such alliance are likely to gain prominence given the strong capabilities exhibited by Indian players. Overall, we believe that competitive pressures are here to stay as a) MNCs become aggressive in India, b) domestic players leverage on their expanded field force and c) potential regulatory interventions could hurt pricing. Additionally, with the introduction of product patent regime, the basket of products available for introduction is also gradually declining. Given this scenario, companies are countering these challenges by expanding into other therapeutic areas, developing combination and controlled release products and even looking at in-licensing/comarketing opportunities with foreign players. We believe, companies with relatively diversified therapeutic exposure, strong positioning in chronic segments (which are likely to grow faster), wide spread distribution reach and strong R&D capabilities would continue to exhibit a stable operating performance albeit industry-wide challenges would continue to remain imperative.
40.9%
39.8%
38.8%
39.6%
32.0%
29.1%
25.1%
26.4%
25.9%
ICRA LIMITED
US Generics: Large patent expiries + focus on limited competition products to drive growth
Exhibit 5: Trend in US Formulation for Indian Companies*
6,000 5,000
4,000 90.3% 100%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q2 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY13 US Formulations Sales (Rs. Crore) Change (%) YoY
With a market size of US$ 320 billion, the United States remains the largest pharmaceutical market, globally. Given the sizeable generic substitution (~75% in volume terms), It is also the largest generics market and considered to be one of the most matured of all the markets. The price erosion post patent expiration is also amongst the highest in the US, reflecting the extent of competitive pressures. With ~$100 billion worth patent expiries over the next 5 years, generic business enjoys strong growth prospects. Besides patent expirations, healthcare reforms initiated by the US Government, aimed at reducing healthcare spending and covering a larger proportion of population under public healthcare are also likely to provide impetus to growth in the generics market.
Source: Company Reports; ICRA Estimates; * peer set includes seven companies
152
60%
225 135 133
40%
38
23
77
65
80%
63
38
103
0% Sun Ranbaxy Aurobindo Dr. Reddy's Lupin Pharma* Approved Pending (Non Para IV) Cadila
48
20%
65
Para IV
Source: Company Reports; ICRA Estimates; * Includes filings from Taro Details of Para IV opportunities for Sun Pharma and Cadila are not available
ICRA LIMITED
69
[Indian companies]
US Generics: Aggressive product life cycle strategies + price erosions remain challenging
Exhibit 8: Expected Market Size of Branded Product Expiries in US by Year
40 35
35
In US$ Billion
30
25 20 22
20 15
10
With some of the major blockbuster drugs losing patent protection, the generics market is likely to maintain a strong growth momentum in the near term. Some of the largest branded products are expected to lose patent protection in 2012 with a market size of approximately $35 billion. In the US market, notable upcoming patent expirations include Lexapro and Seroquel in March 2012, Plavix in May, Singulair and Actos in August and Diovan in September. While some of these products are expected to face multiple generic competition thereby leading to severe price erosion, we believe that the sheer size of these products still creates growth opportunity for most of the players. As a result we remain positive on the fundamental conditions in the global generic drug sector, reflecting not only the genericization of blockbuster branded products, but also global cost containment efforts that favor generic drugs. Additionally, the full year impact of brands (i.e. Lipitor, Plavix, Zyprexa and Levaquin) which have recently gone off-patent would also continue to drive revenue growth in 2012. While patent expires are expected to peak out in 2012, we believe that the growth momentum would continue as most of Indian companies have a fairly well spread out product pipeline till 2014. Among Indian companies, while some companies (i.e. Ranbaxy, Dr. Reddys) have a healthy pipeline of FTF opportunities, others like Lupin, Glenmark are likely to benefit from the launch of oral contraceptives, beginning H2 FY13. As discussed earlier, the quality of pipeline of top Indian companies is gradually strengthening, comprising of higher Para IV filings, specialty products and niche complex chemistry molecules. Most of these segments, especially injectables, inhalers, ophthalmic, oral contraceptives and controlled releases products are set to lose patent expiries beyond 2012. Being characterized by complex manufacturing techniques, entailing greater investments in R&D and manufacturing, these segments have higher entry barriers and thereby potential for limited competition and higher profitability. For segments such as biosimilars where roadmap for generic approval is yet to be established in the US may also require marketing efforts as efficacy profile of two copycats of biologics could be different. Some of the other trends being witnessed in the industry include aggressive product life cycle management by large innovator companies to protect their earnings in view of patent expirations and slowing new product introductions. Life cycle management includes patent extensions, switching to OTC category, product substitution and launch of authorized generics (which can significantly erode attractiveness of the Para IV exclusivities). All these have significantly increased the costs and capped potential upsides from patent challenges for generic companies. In the last two years, there has been greater emphasis on patent settlements by Indian generics, which however significantly reduces launch uncertainties and litigation costs and hence is a positive from credit standpoint.
ICRA LIMITED
US Generics: Continued
The current wave of patent expirations has also triggered consolidation in the industry as innovator companies look for growth opportunities by diversifying their business profile, entering into newer therapeutic/product segments or even markets. Apart from M&As, many of the innovator companies are also reconfiguring their R&D operations either by reducing R&D spending or exiting segments where prospects for NCEs look dismal. Outsourcing or partnering with smaller companies for early stage development is another trend that is gaining momentum. In the generics space too, consolidation has been a prominent phenomenon. The top four generic players now account for over 60% of the market compared to ~30-35% a decade ago. Comparatively, while Indian players have significantly ramped up their product portfolio and made a mark in the US generics space, they remain small in comparison to the generic majors such as Teva, Mylan and Sandoz. The sheer scale of these entities gives an edge in generics business. While scale is the foremost factor, channel servicing and product pipeline are equally important, especially in developed markets such as US which are dominated by large distributors/retailers that enjoy tremendous bargaining power. Strong management focus on legal and R&D skills is also necessary to ensure emphasis on product development of FTF/exclusive products also add to business strengths. In recent periods regulatory compliance for developed markets has also been a cause of concern for a number of companies. While most Indian manufacturers have been able to resolve 483s/regulatory concerns flagged by international regulatory agencies, our discussion with industry indicates that there is likely to be some increase in compliance cost over the near term to meet tightening quality norms in these markets.
Europe: Regulatory reforms + price erosion remains a key concern; generic substitution to gain momentum
Unlike the U.S, the European generics market is quite diverse. Regulations, reimbursement policies (and consequently prices), competitive landscape and generic penetration varies across markets. While some of the European markets, such as the U.K, Germany and Netherland are characterized by relatively high generic penetration (~50%+), other key markets like France, Italy and Spain have low generic usage at around 25%. Apart from generic penetration, the reimbursement policies and consequently pricing also differ across markets. While in some markets, reimbursements are based on reference pricing mechanism, in other markets, generics are priced to a discount to the innovators brand. For instance, in the U.K, the pricing is set by a scheme based on the pharmacy purchase profit. In Europe, most Governments have implemented austerity measures aimed at reducing healthcare spending as they seek to repair their fiscal benefits. Some of markets have shifted away from branded generics to unbranded generics or tender market; in the process, the pricing power of generics companies is getting rapidly eroded. In addition, the rising bargaining power of large distributors, retailers and insurance companies are potential dampener to pricing power of generic companies.
40% 30%
20% 10%
ICRA LIMITED
Europe: Continued
Exhibit 12: Snapshot of measures announced by European Governments
Country U.K. Government Initiatives to reduce healthcare cost Continued use of risk-sharing schemes (effective drug discounting) for expensive drugs; generic substitution by pharmacists is among the highest in the UK Germany Has moved from being a branded generics market to a tender driven one; healthcare reforms has put the negotiating power firmly in the hands of the countrys healthcare funds France 2011 budget incorporated reduction in healthcare bill besides tax breaks for companies that market high-selling orphan drugs More importantly, the Government has also proposed changes in reimbursement levels for drugs that only have moderate effect Spain Announced similar price cuts/rebates in line with other European nations; in August 2011, passed a bill for promoting generics Italy Price cuts to the extent of 12.5% on generics and introduction of tendering system from 2011 onwards Source: Industry Estimates, ICRA
At the same time government legislation and insurance companies are increasingly incentivizing pharmacists and patients to substitute branded medicine with cheaper generic alternatives, which remains a key growth driver. Overall in volume terms, in comparison to North America (generic penetration in volume terms ~75-80%) generic penetration in Europe is generally lower, with significant potential in growth in a number of countries. In Germany, after the series of healthcare reforms, the market has transformed into tenderdriven model from a branded generics market. Healthcare funds are increasingly playing an important role in determining the products being sold in the market, following the reforms implemented in 2009. It is estimated that nearly one-fourth of the German generics market has migrated to a tender-driven one, resulting in significant pricing pressure. Price cuts (in generics) have been common across nations ranging between 5-25% depending on product segments and markets. All these measures are expected to support the growth in generics driven by increasing substitution levels and patent expirations. In comparison to the US generics, the dependence of top Indian companies in the Europe as a whole has been relatively lower. Among leading players, Wockhardt has the highest exposure to Europe with over 37% contribution to revenues. Among the other players, Dr. Reddys (owing to its acquisition of Betapharm in Germany), Ranbaxy, Cipla and Intas Pharma have considerable presence in the European markets. Although most of the players have presence across nations, many of them have established prominent position in certain key markets through steady expansion in product portfolio and supply relationship with the distribution channels. Most of the companies also acquired local companies during the initial phase with the intent of gaining front-end marketing capabilities (i.e. market authorizations, distribution relationships) and even manufacturing in certain cases. The performance of Indian players in the European markets has been relatively lackluster largely emanating from unanticipated changes in market structure and pricing pressures. Nonetheless, the European markets remain an important part of Indian companies long-term growth strategy. Companies have been ramping up their presence across markets by steadily enhancing product portfolio, investing in developing marketing and distribution strengths.
15% 14% 6%
ICRA LIMITED
Challenges The Government is playing an increasing active role in regulating market access as well as controlling prices of essential drugs through reference pricing mechanism The market is gradually transforming from a high out-of-pocket driven market to a western European model of centralized reimbursements In the long run, the Government also aims to encourage local manufacturing by offering incentives to promote R&D Despite being a branded generics, it has been a difficult market to penetrate given the strong dominance of local players which control over 60-70% of the market
Positioning of Indian Players Key Indian Players - Ranbaxy, Dr. Reddys, Lupin and Glenmark th For instance, Dr. Reddys is ranked 15 in Russia and is the third most important market after US and India with 17% contribution to turnover
Growth Drivers - Per capita spending on healthcare is higher than other emerging markets but remains low - Transition to the OTC segment offers strong growth prospects Brazil Market Growth Largest pharmaceutical market in Latin America, growing at a CAGR of ~15% Growth Drivers - Low per capita spending on healthcare - Govt. interference is much lower; out-ofpocket spending is significant South Market Growth Africa - Relatively small market but growing at fast pace; in FY11 market grew by 8% Growth Drivers - Implementation of NHI to encourage the penetration of generics Source: Industry Data, ICRA Research
Key Indian Players Ranbaxy, Torrent Pharma Torrent is one of the leading Indian player in the Brazilian market with a share of 6.8% in the representative market th Ranbaxy is also ranked 9 (M.S. 2.8%) in generics Participation in Govt. tenders also is significant among Indian players Key Indian Players Cipla, Ranbaxy, Lupin Cipla through its partner Medpro has major presence in South Africa among Indian players. th th Lupin acquired Pharma Dynamics (ranked 19 & 6 in generics); currently is working on moving manufacturing to India & augmenting product portfolio
Prices increases are generally restricted and controlled by the Government Industry works on a Single Exit Price mechanism for essential drugs which essentially means that companies are mandated to sell their products at same price to all customers
ICRA LIMITED
Evolving generics opportunity in Japan + biosimilars also offers long-strong growth prospects but with challenges across the value chain
Japanese market offers new growth avenue for Indian generic players
Amongst the key markets outside the United States and Europe, the Japanese market offers potential to drive significant growth in the medium term. With healthcare reforms aimed to reduce healthcare budgets and generic friendly policies being adopted by the Japanese Government, the pharmaceutical market is gradually opening up to generics. The current generic penetration in Japan, estimated at ~23%, is low and the Government has targeted ~30% penetration by 2012. As a result, despite being the second largest pharmaceutical market in the world, the Japanese market ranks only as the sixth largest generic market. Apart from the wide ranging governments pro-generic reforms, major patent expiries in 2012 are also likely to propel generic penetration in Japan. The Japanese generic market however is a challenging one on many fronts e.g., the reimbursement structure (as margins for pharmacies are linked to reimbursement prices, higher generic substitution would therefore mean lower margins for pharmacies), consumer mindset (strong preference towards brands, as a result, generic penetration is likely to be gradual) and absence of exclusivity mechanism (unlike US, in Japan, the regulatory mechanism does not provide an exclusivity period for generic FTF applicants, leaving little incentive for generic players to adopt that route). The approval process for generics is also quite stringent and time consuming. Given the market specific challenges, majority of the generics sold in Japan are manufactured by local players. Thus, local experience through joint venture or partnerships is critical for success in product selection, manufacturing and distribution. Among Indian companies, Lupin, Ranbaxy, Torrent Pharma and Cadila Healthcare are among the front runners in this market. While Ranbaxy (by virtue of its Japanese parent, Daiichi Sankyo) is exploring a hybrid model for the Japanese market, Lupin has recently strengthened its presence by acquiring another company (Irom Pharmaceuticals) in the injectables segment.
but with challenges across the development cycle and approval pathway
However, there are certain challenges in developing biosimilars in comparison to generics for small molecules. Unlike chemical (non-biological) compounds, which are produced synthetically, biopharmaceutical production involves the use of living organisms and due to their heavy molecular weight, complex molecular structure and extremely intricate manufacturing process, biologics are difficult to replicate. As a result, it is difficult to compare and determine equivalence of biosimilars, which impedes the regulatory pathway for their approval. Additionally, due to higher regulatory barriers, the R&D investments for developing such products remain significant and so does the capex in manufacturing facilities after commercialization. Even within biosimilars, products can have varying efficacy profiles, resulting in differentiated products among companies. As a result of this peculiarity, companies need to market the biosimilars products through dedicated field force. Thus, marketing efforts are also critical in case of biosimilars. Among markets, the European regulatory agency (EMEA) has announced the guidelines for approval for biosimilars and has already approved a number of biosimilars. Comparatively, in the US, the market for biosimilars remains limited as of now as the FDA is still in the process of developing the regulatory pathway for biosimilars. The market is dominated by sales of Erythropoietin, Filgrastim and growth hormones. The key generic players marketing biosimilars are Sandoz, Teva, Hospira and Stada besides others. Some of the Indian companies have also started launching biosimilars in emerging markets including in India. Dr. Reddys, Biocon and Lupin have so far been at the forefront as far as investments and R&D pipeline is concerned. In our view, given the complexities and high costs involved, Indian players will need to collaborate with technical partners to aid in the development cycle as well as the marketing stage. Such partnerships are already visible in this segment. While Teva runs a JV with Lonza (provides technical inputs in biologics APIs), Biocon has entered into various co-development alliances with global pharmaceutical majors and research companies with presence in monoclonal anti-bodies and insulin. ICRA LIMITED
M&A: Acquisitions are giving way to partnerships with focus on specific markets or therapy segments
In the past, acquisitions have played a vital role for Indian companies in establishing their presence in international markets. Most of the acquisitions have either been in the generic segment or in the contract research & manufacturing segment. Only a handful of acquisitions have been in the $200 million plus range, with a majority being small-sized acquisitions in value terms. Investments in generic space have been aimed at gaining presence in newer markets, access to technologies or even acquiring marketing and distribution front-end. In the CRAMS space, access to new clients and technologies has been key rationale for acquisitions. The initial phase of investments was largely in regulated markets (European Union and North America) however, with higher growth prospects in emerging markets, the focus has also widened to semi-regulated markets in Africa, Latin America, and South-East Asia. These markets offer potential for profitable growth with relatively easier regulatory pathways. Except for certain transactions, most of the acquisitions have been relatively small sized. In the recent period, the pace at which Indian companies have acquired international assets have slowed down considerably as preference towards forming JVs/alliances with focus on specific markets or therapy segments is gaining importance. The performance of past acquisitions has generally been mixed. Unanticipated changes in market dynamics, inability to move sourcing to low-cost locations and contract cancellation have been some of the factors adversely affecting performance. The transformation of the German pharmaceutical market from being a branded generic to a tender drive one for instance eroded value for some acquisitions and continues to remain a difficult investment to manage. Certain companies have also faced challenges in securing new contracts, particularly in the CRAMS space. As a result, companies have become more prudent in their investment decisions than earlier. Among key acquisitions in the recent period, Dr. Reddys acquired GSKs penicillin manufacturing facility in U.S., allowing it to enter the U.S. penicillin-containing anti-bacterial market with brands such as Augmentin and Amoxil. More recently, Cadila Healthcare acquired Biochem to strengthen its presence in the antibiotic segment in the Indian market. During the year, Lupin also continued with its strategy to augment its presence in the Japanese market; having acquired Irom Pharmaceuticals in November 2011. Exhibit 17: List of acquisitions by Indian companies in 2011-12 (indicative)
Company Zydus Cadila Lupin Limited Zydus Cadila Zydus Cadila Dr. Reddys Acquisition Biochem Irom Pharmaceuticals Bremer Pharma Nesher Pharma Market India (Branded) Japan Mainly Europe United States (Generics) United States (Generics) Month December 2011 November 2011 July 2011 June 2011 March 2011 Consideration Not disclosed Not disclosed Not disclosed Not disclosed $ 20 million Rationale Strengthens Cadilas presence in domestic formulations market especially in the anti-biotic segment Strengthens Lupins presence in the Japanese generics market with diversification into the specialty injectables segment Expands presence in the animal healthcare business Allows presence in the controlled-release drugs segment in the US with product portfolio and manufacturing capabilities; step to strengthen presence in the US generics market Allows the company to enter the US penicillin-containing anti-bacterial market segment with brands such as Augmentin and Amoxil and diversify its generics portfolio in the US
With patent expirations at its peak and weak pipeline quality, there is a continuous pressure on innovator companies to explore other avenues including generic business especially in emerging markets. Globally, many of the large innovator companies already have their generic arms which are aggressively pursuing opportunities across markets. In recent period, most of the innovator companies have entered into alliances with generic companies from India. In most cases, these alliances are designed to leverage on the R&D and low-cost manufacturing capabilities of Indian partners and marketing and distribution capabilities of the MNCs. There is also an increasing trend among MNCs in partnering in the domestic market where marketing and distribution footprint of Indian companies and product portfolio of MNCs is being leveraged upon.
ICRA LIMITED
Dr. Reddys GSK Cadila Healthcare Bayer Cadila Healthcare Abbott Lupin Eli Lilly Biocon Bristol Myers Squibb Source: Company Releases, ICRA
Conclusion
Our outlook on the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry remains favourable, reflecting our view that earnings growth will continue, benefitting from healthy growth in the domestic formulations business and steady growth expected in the U.S/Europe generics space on back of patent expiries. In the U.S, companies with a robust and selective product pipeline, presence in niche/complex segments and diversified therapies would continue to exhibit a relatively strong earnings profile. There would also be significant one-time upsides for companies, stemming largely from Para IV/FTF opportunities in US. In the European markets, while companies may face pressure on profitability, volume growth would continue as healthcare reforms initiated by Governments would push growth in generics. Emerging markets, with growing spend on healthcare and strong branded generic market offers profitable growth opportunities for generic business. Besides emerging markets, the gradually evolving generics opportunity in Japan, the second-largest market in the world (after United States) also offers generic players the opportunity to pursue long-term investments. On the CRAMS front, Indian players are focusing on providing services across the value chain spanning from development stage to commercial scale production. Relatively lower exposure to small biotech companies has been a risk mitigant during the downturn for these entities. With several drugs going off-patent and big pharma increasing exposure to cost efficient sourcing locations, opportunities remain favourable for CRAMS players to provide developmental services and subsequently graduate to commercial scale production. Key challenges facing the industry are potential implementation of the new pricing policy in India, increasing competitive pressure in the chronic segments, aggressive approach such as authorized generics by innovators in the US and healthcare reforms in European markets are some of the factors that could impede profitability for pharma companies. ICRA currently has ~80 entities with long-term ratings (excluding SO ratings) in the pharmaceutical sector. About 10% of these entities are rated in the AA category - these entities have strong and profitable domestic branded formulations business, which has been a stable source of cash flows over the years. Around 41% of the entities are rated in the non-investment graded. Most of these entities are relatively small entities, often in API business and suffer from high product or client concentration.
ICRA LIMITED
Company Section
ICRA LIMITED
AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED Sequential recovery in business; resolution on US FDA issues holds key for further improvement
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,192.2 319.5 43.4 11.5 5.9 4.1 267.0 78.3 188.6 Q3 FY12 1,284.5 7.7% 191.2 55.2 27.4 4.9 (144.5) (31.0) (2.4) (28.5) 14.9% -2.2% Q2 FY12 1,075.3 19.5% 114.6 46.2 20.7 6.0 (185.4) (131.7) (51.6) (80.2) 10.7% -7.5%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
26.8% OPBDIT/OI (%) 15.8% PAT/OI (%) Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth APL performance in Q3 FY12 improved on a sequential basis as reflected by a 19.5% growth in operating income on QoQ basis and a healthy 420 bps improvement in operating margins. The growth on sequential basis was primarily driven by scale up in companys formulations (ex-US) and ARVs business. Some of the issues that impacted the business during the last quarter namely logistics (due to Telengana agitation) and persistent power cuts also were resolved to a large extent thereby leading to some recovery in the business. On a YoY basis, the companys formulations business (56% of turnover) witnessed a growth of 14.7% driven largely by European and RoW markets even as US business remained flat. Growth was primarily led by entry into newer markets in Europe and product launches in emerging markets especially GCCs. In the US, the FDA overhang continued to the impact business which coupled with slowdown in orders from Pfizer led to flattish sales during the quarter. In comparison to formulations, the companys API business posted a slightly higher growth of 20.3% on back of strong growth in the non-anti-biotic API segments.
4%
5% 44%
6% 40%
2% 43%
60%
40%
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
FY11
Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 924.8 922.3 Growth (%) - YoY 1.8% 8.2% OPBDIT 171.5 171.7 PAT 121.9 51.6 OPBDIT/OI (%) 18.5% 18.6% PAT/OI (%) 13.2% 5.6% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
May-11
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
20%
44%
51%
54%
56%
Profitability The companys OPBDIT margins at 14.9% dropped sharply on YoY basis but improved on sequential basis. Some of the reasons that have impacted APLs profitability during the year include (i) adverse product mix Stock Movement (ii) lower licensing income, (iii) overheads on account related to 250.0 manufacturing units that are under import alert and (iv) and increase in 200.0 employee expenses etc. These factors along with a large MTM loss on forex 150.0 100.0 liabilities resulted in a loss of Rs. 31 crore in Q3 FY12 at PBT level. While APIs 50.0 performance has been impacted during the current year on various front, the management however remains confident of a recovery led by launch of Volumes Aurobindo's Stock Price certain high value products (under Pfizer deal), ramp-up in injectables portfolio and OTCs in the US over the medium term. Any positive announcement on US FDA issues and ramp-up in supply contracts (with Pfizer & AZ) could remain key developments to watch out for in the near term.
Aurobindo Pharma Limited (APL) is a leading formulations and API player with presence across developed and emerging markets. Over the last five years, it has transformed its business model from being a pure API player to a company with diversified product mix (increasing share of formulations) and geographic mix (higher proportion of sales from developed markets). In FY11, formulations accounted for 54% of companys turnover (up from 39% in FY08), while the share of low-margin APIs have declined to 40% (from 61% in FY08). Driven by aggressive product filings across markets, APL has also been able to generate a sizeable income through out-licensing of dossiers. It has managed to rapidly grow its business in the US generics space through a confluence of aggressive product filings, large manufacturing capabilities and a supply contract with Pfizer. APL is one of the leading ANDA filers from India (209 as on FY11) and among the largest suppliers for ARVs drugs to the WHO.
Scale-up in US generics space has transformed APLs business profile: Despite being a late entrant, APL has been able to register an impressive scale up in the US generics space through aggressive product filings (up from 82 in FY07 to 209 in FY11), contract manufacturing tie-ups with Pfizer (extensive tie-up, covers over 100 products) and large manufacturing capabilities. With considerable experience in APIs, the company has also maintained a competitive edge through backward integrated operations besides establishing relationship with leading distribution companies in the US. While we expect, the US business to remain the key growth driver for the company, benefitting from the impending patent expiries in the US and strong product line-up, the recent import alert and a warning letter for two of its manufacturing units have obstructed the scale-up to an extent. Inorganic investments + supply contracts to drive growth in EU: At present, APL generates about 6-7% of its turnover from EU markets. In line with other generic players, APL has also forayed into these markets through acquisitions. It has so far acquired companies in the UK, Netherlands and Italy. All the acquisitions have been with the intent to get ready access in these markets through a portfolio of market authorizations and distribution network. As on March 2011, the company had filed around xx product dossiers and received xx approvals. In addition, the companys tie-up with Pfizer also covers the EU markets in an extensive way, which coupled with companys large product filings and strategy to enter into new markets is likely to help the company scale up business in Europe. Emerging markets also hold strong growth potential: Similar to the US and EU markets, ROW markets are emerging as promising growth driver for the company driven by aggressive product filings (across product segments and markets), supply tie-ups with Pfizer and Astra Zeneca (focuses primarily on emerging markets) and relatively better product positioning (higher share of branded generics). Till FY11, the company has filed over xx market authorizations across markets with focus on South Africa, Brazil and Australia and Canada in particular. One of the leading players in APIs and ARV Drugs: Besides formulations (54% of revenues), APL also generates a considerable share of its turnover from API. It is one of the leading players in APIs with strong presence in some of the mature Pen-G based anti-biotic such as Cephalosporin and Semi-Synthetic Penicillin (SSPs). However, with increasing focus on formulations and focus on only high-end anti-biotic, the share of revenues from APIs is likely to come down further going forward. Moreover, the recent move to reduce stake in an intermediates facility (in China) reflects its gradual shift away from APIs. APL also has significant presence in the Anti-Retroviral (ARV) drugs through participation in various tender programmes of international procuring agencies. Over the last four years (i.e. FY08-11), the ARV business has grown at a CAGR of 20% driven by steadily increasing demand and companys increasing participation (through tenders). However, with PEPFAR budgets being flat for almost last four years, the share of revenues from ARV business is likely to come down, considering the expectation of higher growth in the other segments.
ICRA LIMITED
CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Acquisitions drive growth however margins decline on consolidation of lower-profitability businesses
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Net Interest Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,166.8 256.2 33.4 19.4 2.9 206.4 36.8 162.0 Q3 FY12 1,383.2 18.5% 261.6 46.5 59.4 18.2 173.9 17.4 149.2 18.9% 10.8% Q2 FY12 1,236.4 11.9% 237.1 37.5 76.9 11.0 133.7 23.5 102.7 19.2% 8.3%
ICRA Ratings
OPBDIT/OI (%) 22.0% PAT/OI (%) 13.9% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Cadilas Q3 FY12 net sales at Rs. 1,352.5 crore grew by Not Rated by ICRA 19.2% on YoY basis driven by acquisitions and strong growth in the domestic formulations business (up 17.7%). Adjusted for acquisition (Nesher, Bremer & Biochem), sales growth would have been lower at 13.6%. Among markets, Cadilas reported a growth of 45.1% in the US, however after adjusting for Shareholding Pattern (%) the impact of Nesher, it stood at 27.1%. In constant currency terms, growth rates were much lower largely due to lack of product introductions. Cadilas 74.8% didnt receive US FDA approvals during the quarter being impacted by the Promoters FIIs 5.2% warning letter at its Ahmedabad facility. Growth rates were also sluggish in DIIs 12.3% other key market Europe (up 1% YoY), Brazil (4.9%) and other emerging 7.7% markets (up 2.8%). The companys wellness business also had a challenging Others quarter with 12.0% drop in revenues primarily coming in from steep competition in the skin care segment. The management indicated that Price Performance (%) competition from some of the MNCs and domestic have increased in the 3M 12M recent period and renewed marketing efforts should help in reviving the CHL 1.1% -8.3% demand going forward.
CNX Pharma CNX Nifty 6.7% 13.1%
Q4 FY10
Q1 FY11
Operating Income 846.6 1,133.8 Growth (%) YoY 17.0% 25.5% OPBDIT 189.4 297.4 PAT 118.8 199.2 OPBIT/OI (%) 22.4% 26.2% PAT/OI (%) 14.0% 17.6% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Profitability Despite rupee depreciation, Cadilas operating margins at 18.9% in Q3 FY12 came under pressure on both YoY as well as QoQ basis largely due to the consolidation of some of the lower margin business, drop Stock Movement in highly profitable wellness business and impact of certain one-offs. The 1100 900 company also reported a forex loss of Rs. 34.2 crore which pulled down the 700 net profit to Rs. 149.2 crore, a drop of 7.9% on YoY basis. In the near term, 500 growth prospects remain weak due to under performance in the US and 300 European markets. While warning letter related issues continue to impede 100 growth in the US, challenging environment in Europe is likely to derail Volume CHL's Stock Price growth momentum to an extent. The management however reiterated that the worst is behind in terms of operating profitability and going forward improvement would be driven by inherent synergies between Cadilas domestic formulations business with recently acquired Biochem. Bloomberg Code CDH Market Cap. Rs. 14,513 Crore Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11 Q4 FY11 Q1 FY11 Q2 FY12 Valuations 1,116.7 1,166.8 1,212.9 1,245.7 1,236.4
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12
10.9% -1.8%
50 40 30 20 10 0
May-11
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
Business Overview Cadila Healthcare (Cadila) is one of the top-five leading formulations company in India with strong focus on the fast-growing chronic therapy segments. Apart from domestic formulations, Cadila Healthcare has established itself as an emerging generics player in some of key markets like the United States, the EU and Latin American countries. Clutch of well-thought acquisitions, steady product introductions and therapy expansion, and maintaining service levels have been key factors that have helped the company become strong player in the generic space. Over the years, the company has also entered into certain strategic JVs and alliances having clear focus on leveraging either its manufacturing capabilities or partnering to gain technical expertise in certain product/therapy segments. wT With a contribution of 36% to revenues, domestic formulation is the largest segment for the company followed by United States, Emerging markets and Europe. In India, Cadila has approximately 3.7-4.0% market share with strong position in the CVS, Gastrointestinal, Gynaecology and Anti-Respiratory segments. In addition to scale-up in base business, the company has entered into a JV with Bayer for co-marketing products in India and more recently acquired Biochem to strengthen its acute segment portfolio. In the US, Cadilas initial foray and ramp-up was largely driven by highly commoditized oral solids which the company is now augmenting with limited competition segments such as transdermals, injectables etc. The recent acquisition of Nesher Pharma has helped the company gain presence in the controlled release substance portfolio. Among other markets, Cadila has created considerable presence in the Brazilian market and is also increasing its focus on the Japanese generics segment. Additionally, the company has also established certain JVs/alliances with leading players with a specific strategic intent either leveraging on the capabilities in certain therapy areas or markets:
Tie-Ups Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Zydus Hospira Oncology Zydus BSV Pharma Deal with Abbott Labs. Source: Company Data, ICRA Area APIs Oncology Oncology Emerging Markets Comments JV with Nycomed for manufacturing starting material for Pantoprazole; supports Nycomeds branded generics portfolio Turnover Rs. 111.2 crore (FY11) 50:50 JV with Hospira Inc.; Turnover Rs. 430.4 crore (FY11) 50:50 JV with Bharat Serums; it owns rights to a novel and patented oncology product; also provided contract manufacturing services Signed a deal with Abbott to manufacture 24 of its branded generics for certain emerging markets; the alliance aims to leverage on Abbotts strong marketing & distribution footprint in those markets and Cadilas manufacturing capabilities
ICRA LIMITED
CIPLA LIMITED Product and market rationalizations efforts impede exports growth; focus clearly shifting on profitable segments
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,557.1 318.2 65.3 2.9 25.7 275.7 43.0 232.7 Q3 FY12 1,758.0 12.9% 391.5 75.7 3.2 30.2 342.6 72.7 269.9 22.3% 15.4% Q2 FY12 1,778.0 -1.1% 437.6 65.6 2.4 24.3 393.9 85.0 309.0 24.6% 17.4%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
OPBDIT/OI (%) 20.4% PAT/OI (%) 14.9% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Ciplas Q3 FY12 revenues at Rs. 1,758.0 crore grew by 12.9% on YoY basis driven by strong growth in the domestic formulations business (up 18.4% YoY) and relatively muted performance in exports which grew by a modest 10.7% during the quarter. The healthy growth in domestic business was aided by a strong 36% growth in the generic business and 14-15% growth in the branded business benefiting from strong revenues in the anti-asthma segment. In the exports segment, Ciplas revenues at Rs. 865.8 crore grew by only 10.7% (as declined sequentially) as the company continued with its product and market rationalization measures resulting increasing focus on higher profitable products/segments. Overall, the management remains confident of achieving higher than industry growth of 15-16% in the domestic business driven by steady product introductions and strong field force even as exports growth is likely to remain in 10% level on YoY basis Profitability On the profitability front, Ciplas OPBDIT margins at 22.3% during the quarter improved by almost 200 bps on YoY basis primarily aided by improvement in gross margin as a result of product and market rationalizations efforts being pursued by the company. While Ciplas gross margins improved by almost 400 bps during the quarter, due to annual increments and increased manpower count, the favourable impact on OPBDIT was partially negative by higher employee expenses. The growth in net profit at 16.0% was however marginally lower than the rise in operating profit due to higher tax rate which increased during the quarter following expiry of tax benefits at EOUs. Cipla incurred a capex of Rs. 130 crore during the quarter with full year guidance maintained at Rs. 500-600 crore; impact of forex was marginal at Rs. 4.5 crore (booked in other income).
Q2 FY11 1,634.4 12.0% 366.6 263.0 22.4% 16.1% Q3 FY11 1,557.1 8.0% 318.2 232.7 20.4% 14.9% Q4 FY11 1,669.2 21.4% 302.1 214.0 18.1% 12.8% Q1 FY12 1,591.4 7.5% 369.5 253.3 23.2% 15.9% Q2 FY12 1,778.0 8.8% 437.6 309.0 24.6% 17.4%
35.0%
30.0%
Stock Movement
400 350 300 250 200 500 400 300 200 100 0
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
Volume
May-11
Operating Income 1,374.7 1,479.8 Growth (%) - YoY 0.9% 7.7% OPBDIT 258.0 337.9 PAT 275.5 257.4 OPBDIT/OI (%) 18.8% 22.8% PAT/OI (%) 20.0% 17.4% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
Company Profile
Cipla Limited (Cipla) is one of the leading pharmaceutical company in the domestic formulations segment with a market share of ~5%. In addition to its strong presence in the Indian market, the company generates nearly 55% of its turnover from exports to various emerging and regulated markets. In the domestic formulations market, Cipla has particularly stronger presence in anti-infective and respiratory segment. Within respiratory, it commands over 75% share of inhalers in India. Over the past three years (FY09-11), the growth in Ciplas domestic formulations at 12.0% has been below the industry average largely due to its higher presence in some of the mature products as well as pure generic segments and comparatively lower presence in fast-growing chronics like CVS and Anti-Diabetic. In the exports market, Cipla operates through partnerships based business model, wherein it develops and manufactures the products and receives licensing income and manufacturing revenues. The companys exports turnover has grown at a CAGR (%) of 17% over the past five years. The African region is major market for the company followed by US and Europe. To strengthen its presence in the exports market, Cipla is targeting the inhalers segment in Europe with a basket of 11 products. Given the high entry barriers (due to relatively longer approval time frames), the inhalers segment faces relatively limited competition compared to pure vanilla generics and offer lucrative opportunity for Cipla to ramp up its presence in the European markets. With recently expanded capacities (at Indore SEZ), growing approvals in the inhalers in Europe and other non-US markets, the company is likely to register strong growth in overseas markets going forward.
ICRA LIMITED
DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LIMITED Growth driven by Marketable Molecules segment; CRAMS expected to revive with impending commercial supplies
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 237.9 31.5 17.1 13.3 1.0 (0.7) 1.7 Q3 FY12 266.2 11.9% 61.5 19.1 16.4 26.0 9.3 16.7 Q2 FY12 269.7 15.7% 28.8 20.7 15.0 (7.0) (0.7) (6.3) 10.7% (2.3%)
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
OPBDIT/OI (%) 13.2% 23.1% PAT/OI (%) 0.7% 6.3% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Revenue Growth Dishmans operating income grew by 11.9% on a YoY basis in Q3 FY12 to Rs. 266.2 crore, facilitated by a favourable currency movement. While the Marketable Molecule business reported a YoY growth of 30.9%, the CRAMS business has reported a YoY growth of 6.9% contributed by 28.7% growth in Carbogen Amcis, while Indian CRAMS business has reported a de-growth. However, facilitated by several new contracts, which include supply of an oncology drug to Astellas for an order value of Euro 18 million per annum starting from January 2013; sale of 150 tonnes of Eprosartan Mesylate to Abbott Laboratories in FY13 (followed by sales of 200 tonnes each in FY14 and FY15); commercial supplies of an antituberculosis drug to Johnson & Johnson with expected sales of Euro 5-6 million in FY13; US$ 6 million contract from Novartis; etc., Dishman management is hopeful of achieving 20% growth in FY13. Profitability Non-recurring research income and higher contribution from sale of high margin Benzethonium drug have resulted in a 987 bps improvement in OPBDITA margin to 23.1% in Q3 FY12. This also includes a forex gain of Rs. 8.1 crore (Rs. 5.7 crore forex gain in Q3 FY11) on account of reversals. With commencement of Vitamin D3 supplies which is in short supply worldwide, OPBDITA margins are expected to further witness an improvement. Developments All three units at Bavla plant Vitamin D3 (Unit 13), Oncology (Unit 9) and Disinfectant (Unit 10) have commenced production in Q3 FY12, and expected to start contributing significantly from FY13 onwards. On account of the increase in operating costs in Shanghai due to which China has no longer remained a core business area for the company, Dishman is in the process of selling its China factory.
Stock Movement
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Volumes
Q4 FY10
Q1 FY11
Operating Income 251.2 212.3 Growth (%) - YoY -15.5% -12.7% OPBDIT 51.9 54.9 PAT 19.9 27.1 OPBDIT/OI (%) 20.7% 25.8% PAT/OI (%) 7.9% 12.8% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
Company Profile
CRAMS: CRAMS, constituting 66% of FY11 sales, is the largest business segment for Dishman, catering to the requirements of multinational pharmaceutical companies internationally, where the company develops intermediates/ APIs based on customers requirements. Dishnmans wholly-owned subsidiary Carbogen Amcis located in Switzerland, spearheads the R&D and supplies API to support clinical trial requirements. Some of Dishmans key contracts include among others, Supply of Eprosartan Mesylate to Abbot Laboratories in FY13 a contract worth Euro 100 million over three years Supply of an oncology drug to Astellas from January 2013 a contract worth Euro 18 million per year Supply of an anti-tuberculosis drug to Johnson & Johnson which has already commenced and expected to result in annual sales of Euro 5-6 million Contract with Novartis for US$ 6 million Other segment: Other segment includes bulk drugs, intermediates, quats, specialty chemicals and outsourced/ trade goods, which accounted for 34% of Dishmans FY11 sales Dishman Specialty Chemicals: Supplies intermediates, fine chemicals and products for the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and related industries. Dishman is a leading manufacturer of Phase Transfer catalysts. Dishman Vitamins and Chemicals: Supplies Vitamin D2, Vitamin D3 and Vitamin D analogues, cholesterol and laolin related products for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and related markets. Dishman Disinfectants: Supplies antiseptic and disinfectant formulations. With strong R&D experience and effective relationship developed with MNC customers, Dishman has emerged as a premier contract manufacturing organization (CMO). The CMO business model was envisaged in the year 1997 and there under set-up a modern production facility at Bavla, near Ahmedabad, which is now a 100% EOU facility. At present, the company has eight multi-purpose production units at Bavla. The company also has manufacturing and R&D facilities in Switzerland, UK and Netherlands. The company has also set up a Greenfield manufacturing facility at Shanghai Chemical Industrial Park, Shanghai.
ICRA LIMITED
DIVIS LABORATORIES LIMITED Revenue momentum continues; to be further boosted by the commissioning of the new facility
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 315.0 123.5 13.5 0.6 7.1 116.5 14.9 101.6 Q3 FY12 417.4 32.5% 151.1 16.2 0.2 25.7 160.4 37.9 122.6 Q2 FY12 366.1 42.5% 138.2 15.2 0.6 10.8 133.2 27.1 106.1 37.8% 29.0%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
Revenue Growth Divis operating income grew by 32.5% on a YoY basis in Q3 FY12 to Rs. 417.4 crore driven by higher volumes for major generic APIs such as Naproxen, Dextromethorphan, Levetiracetam, Nabumetone and Carbidopa/ Levodopastrong. While favourable currency movement accounted for 13% of the overall growth, the company witnessed a QoQ de-growth in the sales of Carotenoids to Rs. 20 crore from Rs. 23 crore in Q2 FY12. The capacity utilization at the DSN SEZ facility in Vizag has remained flat QoQ and is expected to scale up from Q1 FY13 onwards. Thus, the management has lowered its sales growth guidance for FY12 to 20% from 25% earlier. Profitability Diviss OPBDITA margin at 36.2% for Q3 FY12 reported a YoY decline of 300 bps despite the Rupee depreciation on the back of increased fuel and staff cost as also higher overheads due to the commissioning of the DSN SEZ unit at Vizag. The favourable currency movement resulted in a forex gain of ~Rs. 16.0 crore for the quarter, which was however off-set by the higher effective tax rate, moderating the YoY growth in PAT to 21% (Rs. 122.6 crore). Divis effective tax rate has risen to 23.6% in Q3 FY12 (against 12.8% in Q3 FY11) mainly due to the end of the tax holiday on its 100% EOU at Choutuppal and its existing SEZ at Visakhapatnam being eligible only for 50% tax exemption. However, the new DSN SEZ Unit is eligible for exemption of 100% of export profits for five years from April 2011 as it has commenced operations in Q1 FY12, which will again reduce the effective tax rate for the company once production ramps up from the facility.
OPBDIT/OI (%) 39.2% 36.2% PAT/OI (%) 32.2% 29.4% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Stock Movement
900 800 700 600 500
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 312.1 269.4 Growth (%) - YoY -4.8% 27.0% OPBDIT 151.8 102.5 PAT 130.0 86.3 OPBDIT/OI (%) 48.6% 38.1% PAT/OI (%) 41.7% 32.0% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
Company Profile
Divis is engaged in the manufacturing of generic APIs, custom synthesis of active ingredients for innovator companies and other specialty chemicals like peptides and nutraceuticals. The company operates predominantly in the export markets with over 75% of sales to the regulated markets in Europe and USA. As at the end of FY11, Divis has a total of 41 DMFs filed with USFDA and CoS with EDQM for 12 products. It has also filed several dossiers for 28 products with other countries. The company has so far filed 18 patents in India and 12 patents in the USA for generic products. During FY11, Divis has added 21 products to its product portfolio of which 8 are generic APIs and intermediates and 13 are custom synthesis APIs and intermediates. Generic APIs: Divis concentrates on a few niche APIs, which normally fetch better margins and where competition is low. The key generic APIs of the company are Naproxen (anti-inflammatory), Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide (anti-cough), Levodopa (CNS) and Phenylephrine (anti-cough). The company enjoys more than 70% market share across the globe in APIs like Naproxen and Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide. Divis is one of the worlds leading suppliers of Naproxen which is used in the treatment of arthritis, spondylitis and other inflammatory conditions. Around 20% of Divis total revenues in FY11 were contributed by Naproxen. Besides Naproxen, the company has also received approvals from USFDA and EDQM for Naproxen Sodium and its intermediate (DL Naproxen). Recently, Divis has started focusing on nutraceuticals, future generics and specialty chemicals like Carotenoids. In FY11, around 5% of Divis total revenues (~Rs. 62 crore) came from Carotenoids. Carotenoids are coloring agents which are extracted from plants and other natural sources. They are an important source of vitamin, which acts as a preventive agent against cancer and heart diseases. Divis has developed various types of Carotenoids like Astaxanthin, Beta carotene, Canathaxanthin, Apocarotenal, Lutein, Lycopene and Vitamin D3 which are widely used in the Food & Beverage industry. Custom Synthesis APIs: Custom synthesis involves development of a non-infringing process and supply of API and intermediates to innovator pharma companies for supporting their drug discovery process. Due to its strong R&D capabilities and proven track record, Divis is one of the leading custom synthesis players in India with a large number of leading MNC pharma companies as its clients. In custom synthesis, Divis follows a service-based fee model and has a presence across all stages of pre-clinical and clinical trials. Divis owns four R&D centres, two pilot plants, and three large scale manufacturing facilities, with approval from various regulatory bodies. Having an India centric asset base and strong-flexible infrastructure capabilities allows Divis to be a low-cost manufacturer.
ICRA LIMITED
Dr. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED U.S. continues to be the growth driver; exclusivity on Olanzapine supports margin expansion and jump in profits
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Net Interest Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,898.5 404.6 75.8 5.0 19.8 288.4 15.2 273.1 Q3 FY12 2,769.2 45.9% 920.8 89.9 (17.4) 16.5 772.1 261.7 513.0 33.3% 18.5% Q2 FY12 2,267.8 22.1% 520.1 87.9 5.0 21.5 369.5 63.0 307.8 22.9% 13.6%
ICRA Ratings
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]AA+ [ICRA]A1+ Stable
OPBDIT/OI (%) 21.3% PAT/OI (%) 14.4% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth DRLs Q3 FY12 revenues at Rs. 2,769.2 crore grew by a strong 46% on YoY largely led by strong growth in the US market which benefited from the exclusivity on Olanzapine and steady growth in the some of the recently launched products and anti-infective portfolio. DRL has been able to garner around 50% market share in Olanzapine with 4045% price erosion. Among other key markets, DRL reported a growth of 11% in India formulations, though lower than the industry average but reflected an improving trend on QoQ basis. The growth in European markets (at 14%) largely benefitted from rupee depreciation as growth in constant currency terms was flat at 2% YoY. In DRLs other key market Russia, revenue growth (in constant currency terms) was flat at inventory correction measures and delayed onset of winter impacted orders. Going forward, with series of limited competition launches in the US market, growth momentum is expected supported by pick-up in India business Profitability DRLs OPBDIT margins at 33.3% in Q3 FY12 benefitted substantially from the launch of highly profitable Olanzapine which contributed nearly $99 million in sales (out of the $235 million in the US). Excluding the impact of Olanzapine, companys adjusted gross margins were flat on QoQ basis. Despite higher tax provisioning (largely due to higher tax outgo on Olanzapine), net profit rose by 88% to Rs. 513 crore during the quarter. DRL reported forex gains of Rs. 28.5 million in Q3 on restatement of receivables. MTM losses in the balance sheet stood at $85 million as on December 2011 but came down to $30 million by Januaryend following rupee appreciation. During the quarter, the company filed 3 ANDAs taking the pending approvals to 79 including 40 on Para IV and 10 FTFs
Stock Movement
1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
Volumes
May-11
Source: Company Data Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11 Q4 FY11 Operating Income 1,642.4 1,683.1 1,870.4 1,898.5 2,017.3 Growth (%) YoY -17.3% -7.5% 1.8% 9.8% 22.8% OPBIT* 187.6 243.9 300.8 273.6 333.3 PAT 166.7 209.6 286.8 273.1 334.5 OPBIT/OI (%) 11.4% 14.5% 16.1% 14.4% 16.5% PAT/OI (%) 10.1% 12.5% 15.3% 14.4% 16.6% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore; Data based on IFRS Reporting; * after depreciation Q1 FY11 1,978.3 17.5% 260.2 262.7 13.2% 13.3% Q2 FY12 2,267.8 21.2% 352.9 307.8 15.6% 13.6%
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
India 19%
Europe 21%
Business Overview
DRL, amongst the largest Indian pharmaceutical company, is an integrated player with presence across research, manufacturing and marketing of formulations and APIs. The companys business mix is broadly divided into three segments Global Generics (comprising of formulations 71% of turnover in FY11), Pharmaceutical Services and APIs (26%) and Proprietary Products Business (negligible contribution at present). The global generics vertical focuses on marketing and distribution of branded generics (in India, Russia, CIS and emerging markets) and generics (in US and Europe). Among Indian generics majors, DRL is one of the most formidable players in the U.S. generic space even as its performance and market position in India lags that of its peers. The global generics vertical has been the largest contributor to DRLs revenues but the growth rate has exhibited significant volatility largely on account of inorganic growth initiatives as well as one-offs (exclusivities/FTFs/authorized generic) in the U.S. North America remains the largest market for DRLs global generics vertical, where the company also has a strong products pipeline (with 79 pending approvals with 40 Para IVs and 10 FTFs on Dec. 2011). The company has worked on a strategy to achieve critical mass in its base business and build a portfolio of one-off exclusivity backed and limited competition opportunities. With slew of big-ticket launches in the past few quarters, the benefits of companys strategy have started off paying off. This is likely to continue given the lineup of limited competition product over the medium term in the U.S. Apart from U.S., DRL has major presence in India, Russia & CIS and Europe which contributed 22%, 20% and 16% to companys generic business in FY11. In comparison to its peers, DRL has underperformed the domestic market growth over the past few years due to relatively lower focus on fast-growing chronics, supply chain issues and recently the field force restructuring. The company also has relatively higher concentration on top-10 products. Apart from India, Russia and other CIS countries have emerged as one of the top 4 regions for the company over the past few years. Among other Indian generic companies, DRL is the positioned as the strongest player in the Russian market. Despite the challenging environment, prompted largely by steady price erosive moves, the company has been able to successfully grow its presence in the Russian market. DRLs growth strategy for the market involves gradually expanding the proportion of OTC business to 40-45% over the medium term (from 25% in FY11), introduce a basket of bio-similar and in-licensed products and also potentially pursue in-organic investments with focus on product/brand acquisition. Along with scale-up of the existing business segments, DRL is also working on multiple growth segments namely, biosimilars (already doing well India, planning for global launches), proprietary products in the US and emerging markets (through tie-up with GSK). All these initiatives are likely to provide long-term growth avenues for the company. ICRA LIMITED
GLENMARK PHARMA LIMITED Impressive growth in the U.S. and RoW markets drives top line; but forex losses hurt margins
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 749.1 133.9 24.6 39.6 24.1 93.8 7.3 86.5 Q3 FY12 1,031.3 37.7% 102.9 23.1 35.7 10.5 54.5 8.4 46.1 10.0% 4.5% Q2 FY12 1,055.7 45.8% 225.6 24.7 29.1 (8.1) (131.7) 32.1 (23.8) 55.9 21.4% 5.3%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
OPBDIT/OI (%) 17.9% PAT/OI (%) 11.5% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Glenmarks Q3FY12 revenues grew by an impressive 37.7% driven by strong growth in the U.S. generics segment (up 37.7%) as well key markets across Asia Pacific, Latin America and Africa. The growth in the domestic formulations segment was however muted as the company pursued inventory de-stocking measures to improve its working capital cycles. Among other market, the company also reported strong growth in Europe despite price cuts in some of the European markets. The companys generic business also witnessed a healthy growth of 45% largely led by strong 37.7% growth (in $ terms) in the US generics space, benefitting from launch of new products (especially OCs) and market share gains in the existing products. The management believes that steady market share gain coupled with new product launches will keep accelerate the growth momentum in the US market going forward. Profitability Despite strong growth and benefit of depreciating INR, Glenmarks operating margins fell sharply (down 790 bps) in Q3 FY12 led by a confluence of factors with forex losses (on liabilities) being the prominent one. Apart from forex losses, lower growth in the higher margin domestic formulations business, higher API prices and increased R&D spending also added to the pressure on operating profits. As a result of lower margins and other income, Glenmarks profit after tax (PAT) declined by 46.7% to Rs. 46.1 crore as compared to Rs. 86.5 crore in Q3 FY11. Developments Glenmarks key NCE molecule Revamilast (GRC 4039) got approval for conducting Phase IIb trials for indications in Asthma and Rheumatoid Arthritis and management expects to initiate phase III trials by end of FY13. In the US, the company filed two ANDAs and received approval for Montelukast Sodium (expected to be launched by August 2012).
Q3 FY11 758.5 17.0% 174.1 109.6 23.0% 14.4% Q1 FY12 868.8 26.8% 296.9 210.1 34.2% 24.2% Q2 FY12 1,055.7 45.8% 225.6 55.9 21.4% 5.3%
India (28.6%) Specialty Business (57%) LATAM (6.5%) ROW (22.0%) GPLs Sales Mix Out licensing Income US (28.3%) Generics Business* (43%) Europe (1.8%) APIs (11.3%)
Stock Movement
350 300 250 200 400 300 200 100 0
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
Volumes
May-11
Q3 FY10 Q1 FY11 Q2 FY11 Operating Income 648.3 684.8 724.1 Growth (%) - YoY 11.3% 24.8% 20.1% OPBDIT 168.5 170.3 232.3 141.3 PAT 80.9 94.1 170.5 86.2 OPBDIT/OI (%) 28.0% 26.3% 33.9% 19.5% PAT/OI (%) 13.4% 14.5% 24.9% 11.9% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore * Also includes Oncology business (1.4%)
Q2 FY10 602.5
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
Generics Business: Glenmarks generics business accounts for 43% of companys overall turnover and is largely dominated by presence in the US generics space. Over the
past the four years, the companys generics business has grown at a CAGR of 17% between FY08-11 and the US generics business, which contributes nearly 66% has been the key growth driver. In the US, the company is largely focused on niche segments like dermatology, controlled substances, oncology and modified release products. As on FY11, the company had a portfolio of 67 ANDA filings with 41 pending approval including 14 on Para IV. During FY11, the company received approval for 22 ANDA applications (mostly in the oral contraceptive space), highest among Indian pharma companies during the year. In FY11, Glenmark settled four Para IV filings, which considerably adds to the visibility to US business in the medium to long term. The key drugs for which it has settled include Atovaquone, Ezetimibe, Eszopiclone and Lunesta. Besides US generics, the company also has presence in Europe, oncology facility in Latin America and API sales (from India), which form part of its generics business. Its presence in Europe is fairly limited at present, while it is looking at expanding its oncology and API business in regulated markets.
Details of Glenmarks Key FTF opportunities Product Brand Name Ezetimibe Tablets Fluticasone Lotion Hydrocortisone Butyrate Cream Zetia Cultivate Locoid Lipocream
Status & Expected Launch Settled, Expected Launch Dec. 2016 Settled, Expected Launch Dec. 2013 Settled, Expected Launch Mar. 2012
NCE Pipeline: Apart from generics and branded formulations, Glenmark also has an active research portfolio of NCE & NBE. Among Indian pharma companies, Glenmark is
the only to have established a credible track record of being able to regularly monetize its NCE research pipeline. Over the years, the company has been regularly monetizing its NCE pipeline by out-licensing of molecules at different stages of development to large pharmaceutical companies. While it has suffered some setbacks in the past, it has recently out licensed one of its molecules i.e. GRC 15300 to Sanofi for an upfront payment of $20 million. Since FY07, Glenmark has generated cumulative revenues of Rs. 493 crore through out-licensing deals.
Details of Glenmarks key NCE molecules Compound Primary Indication Crofelemer Acute Infectious Diarrhea GRC 4039 Asthma GBR 500 Crohns Disease GRC 15300 Neuropathic Pain Source: Company Releases
Status Completed Phase III trials for HIV diarrhea in US and Phase II for acute diarrhea in adults in India Completed Phase I trials; Initiated Phase II in some countries Phase I completed in US; Initiating Phase II for Chorns Disease; Out-licensed to Sanofi in FY11 Phase I is ongoing in the UK; already out-licensed to Sanofi in FY11 for $ 20 million upfront
ICRA LIMITED
HIKAL LIMITED Hikal posts 152% jump in Q3; net profit at Rs 13.0 crore
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%)-YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 100.8 25.8 9.4 11.6 0.8 -0.4 5.1 0.0 5.2 Q3 FY12 185.5 84.0% 45.1 10.8 11.7 1.1 -11.1 12.7 -0.4 13.0 24.3% 7.0% Q2 FY12 144.6 -1.6% 37.1 10.7 12.2 1.0 -2.2 13.0 1.5 11.4
ICRA Ratings
Revenue Growth Driven by the robust growth in the pharmaceutical segment; Hikals revenues in Q3FY12 stood at Rs. 185.5 crore; higher by 84.0% on YOY basis and 28.3% on QoQ basis. In this quarter, over 70% of the sales of Hikal were from the API and CRAMs business which reported a YoY growth of 91.9% and QoQ growth of 49.9%. The revenues from the pharmaceutical business stood at Rs.130.4 crore. While on the other hand, the crop protection business which contributes around ~30% of the total revenues of Hikal; also saw a growth of 67.8% on YoY with revenues around Rs. 55.0 crores in this quarter.
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]BB+ [ICRA]A4+ Stable
OPBDIT/OI (%) 25.6% PAT/OI (%) 5.1% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Profitability This quarter saw Hikals EBIDTA margin at 24.3%, lower by 122 bps on YoY basis; mainly due to increase in raw material costs and other overhead expenses. In Q3 FY12, the EBIDTA margin for the pharma division 25.6% were around 27.9% which was much lower when compared to 30.9% for the 7.9% corresponding quarter previous year. While on the other hand, the EBIDTA margin from the crop protection business grew by 476 bps YoY basis to 8.9%.
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Apr-11
Feb-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
May-11
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT PAT OPBDIT/OI (%) PAT/OI (%) 163.8 10.9% 44.4 20.0 27.1% 12.2%
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
During the quarter, the interest and depreciation cost was around Rs.11.7 Stock Movement crores and Rs.10.8 crore respectively. Due to currency fluctuations in this 350 quarter, Hikal has booked a forex loss of Rs.11.11 crores. The companys PAT in 300 Q3FY12 was Rs.13.0 crore, indicating a 14% growth on QoQ basis and 152% 250 growth on YoY basis. However, the impact of this robust growth in sales was 200 150 somewhat subdued by the large forex losses seen in this quarter , as the net 100 margins for Hikal in Q3FY12 stood at 7.0%; higher by 190 bps on YoY basis but 50 0 lower by 90 bps on QoQ basis.
ICRA LIMITED
INDOCO REMEDIES LIMITED Recovery in domestic formulations boost revenues; however margins remain muted in Q3
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth(%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) OPBDIT/OI (%) PAT/OI (%) Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates 14.5 3.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 10.5 1.7 8.8 12.5% 7.6% 115.5 Q3 FY12 142.6 23.5% 16.3 5.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.9 8.3 11.4% 5.8% Q2 FY12 147.4 8.9% 20.7 4.7 1.4 0.1 0.0 14.6 0.8 13.8 14.0% 9.4%
ICRA Ratings
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]A+ [ICRA]A1+ Stable
Revenue Growth - In Q3FY12, IRLs operating income grew by 23.6% on a YoY basis to Rs. 141.5 crore. Due to healthy growth in therapeutic segments like respiratory (23.6%) and gastro-intestinal (23.1%); the domestic formulations business witnessed a better traction as revenues grew by 14.8% YoY basis to Rs. 84.9 crore. In the export formulation business, IRLs revenues grew by 35.5% to Rs.45.5 crore driven by growth in regulated markets (up by 38.7% to Rs. 37.0 crore). IRL has started commercial supplies of anti-diabetic products for the Eastern Europe market and is also participating in a new German tender for 7 products, which is expected to be announced in Q1FY13. In the emerging markets division, the revenues grew by 23.1% YoY to Rs. 8.5 crore on the back of supplies to Ghana and new launches in other regions. As for the API business, the domestic sales were up by 34% YoY to Rs. 5.2 crore; owing to new product launch in the ophthalmic segment. During the quarter, API export sales more than doubled (up by 107%) to Rs. 5.7 crore due to new customer additions in Europe for anti-glaucoma segment and sale of an API intermediate in Japan. Profitability - Despite recovery in the high margin domestic formulations business and favourable currency, EBITDA margins in this quarter declined by 110 bps YoY to 11.4% on the back of forex losses and high marketing expenses and employee costs. With the commission of the Goa III facility; both interest and depreciation increased sharply, which led to net profit declining by 6.2% YoY to Rs. 8.3 crore. Developments- In this quarter, IRL has signed an alliance with Austrias DSM Pharmaceuticals to market eight of its existing APIs to new geographies, for which the commercial supplies are expected to start in Q1FY13. Till date, the company has submitted 5 US ANDA; bringing total ANDA count to 13 (of which 7 are under the Watson Deal).
Stock Movement
460 440 420 400 380 360 340
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
4 3 2 1 0
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Operating Income 110.5 Growth (%) - YoY 27.8% OPBDIT 12.6 PAT 8.2 OPBDIT/OI (%) 11.4% PAT/OI (%) 7.5% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
IPCA LABORATORIES LIMITED Export formulations drive revenue growth and operating margin; net margin remains flat on account of forex losses
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 466.4 91.0 14.2 7.3 2.1 82.8 18.8 64.0 Q3 FY12 614.8 31.8% 151.3 18.1 10.8 3.9 86.4 22.5 63.9 Q2 FY12 623.5 20.3% 158.0 17.6 11.8 2.6 104.2 26.2 78.0 25.3% 12.5%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
Revenue Growth IPCAs operating income grew by 31.8% on a YoY basis in Q3 FY12 to Rs. 614.8 crore driven by export formulations (73% YoY growth) despite growth moderation in domestic formulations. The muted growth of ~6% in domestic formulations (over Q3 FY11) was pressurised by weak anti-malarial sales, though cardiovascular and pain management segments have started to show improvements. IPCAs API sales growth of ~5% also appears to be muted despite substantial increase in production as a major part of API sales is utilized for captive consumption. Nonetheless, the management remains confident of clocking at least 20% revenue growth in FY12 as the benefits of internal restructuring exercise begin to demonstrate results. However, IPCAs export formulation growth would be largely dependent on the impending approval of its Indore SEZ by the USFDA. Profitability IPCAs OPBDITA margin improved 509 bps YoY to 24.6% led by favourable currency realization, lower material cost (by 2.9%), and an increase in other operating income to Rs. 13.1 crore from Rs. 3.0 crore in Q3 FY11 on account of some dossier sales income and Rs. 7 crore provision made in respect of the focus market scheme announced by the Government (even though the scheme is effective from April 2012; since the announcement was made in the quarter, IPCA has recorded the same). Despite strong 66% growth at the OPBDITA level, net profit remained almost flat at Rs. 63.9 crore on account of forex losses of Rs. 39.9 crore largely due to translation of ECBs. Excluding forex loss in Q3 FY12 and forex gains in Q3 FY11 (Rs. 11.2 crore), the like-to-like net profit witnessed a significant YoY growth of 96.8%. Developments IPCAs Indore facility has been inspected by the USFDA in January 2012 and the management expects to receive the approval within two months. The company has filed for 13 ANDAs from this plant and expects approval for 6 ANDAs along with the USFDA approval.
OPBDIT/OI (%) 19.5% 24.6% PAT/OI (%) 13.7% 10.4% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Stock Movement
400 300 200 100 0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
80 60 40 20 0
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 367.8 418.0 Growth (%) - YoY 15.8% 16.4% OPBDIT 67.6 71.2 PAT 37.3 38.8 OPBDIT/OI (%) 18.4% 17.0% PAT/OI (%) 10.1% 9.3% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
JUBILANT LIFE SCIENCES LIMITED Generics business drives revenue growth; services business drives operating margin
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 869.0 132.2 49.3 28.6 1.7 (2.3) 53.7 10.4 44.1 Q3 FY12 1,088.5 25.3% 208.4 53.9 56.6 3.5 (155.5) (54.1) 8.9 (78.4) Q2 FY12 1,050.1 22.1% 238.1 50.8 49.7 3.4 (42.6) 98.4 9.3 79.4 22.7% 7.6%
ICRA Ratings
Revenue Growth Jubilants operating income grew by 25.3% on a YoY basis Not Rated by ICRA in Q3 FY12 to Rs. 1,088.5 crore on account of strong growth in the Generics business (YoY growth of 79%) driven by favourable pricing in Dosage Forms. Life Science Product revenues (constituting 80% of total sales) witnessed a YoY growth of 24% backed by both volume growth and strong price increase, while Life Science Services business (constituting 20% of total sales) Shareholding Pattern (%) witnessed a YoY growth of 32%. Going forward, the management expects the 49.0% growth momentum to continue backed by increased capacity utilization, new Promoters FIIs 28.4% product launches and expansion in high growth geographies. Profitability In Q3 FY12, the companys OPBDITA was Rs. 208.4 crore, up 57.7% YoY with margin at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Q3 FY11 on account of a nine fold increase in margins of the Services business (margin of 10.9% in Q3 FY12 due to increased capacity utilization and low base) and increase in profitability of the Products business by 80 bps to 23.6%. However, the company has reported a net loss of Rs. 78.4 crore in Q3 FY12 due to an exceptional loss of Rs. 155.5 crore (exceptional loss of Rs. 2.3 crore in Q3 FY11) towards MTM in respect of currency and interest rate swap and amortization of foreign currency monetary item translation difference. Adjusting for the same, the like-to-like net profit has witnessed a YoY growth of 66.1%. Going forward, product business profitability is expected to be backed by improved capacity utilization, increased vertical integration and favourable prices of certain key products; while services business profitability would be backed by higher margin product mix and cost optimization. Developments Commissioning of Symtet plant is expected by March 2012. The management has guided for a total capex of Rs. 500 crore in FY12, of which Rs. 377 crore has already been spent till Q3 FY12.
DIIs Others 1.4% 21.2%
OPBDIT/OI (%) 15.2% 19.1% PAT/OI (%) 5.1% (7.2%) Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Stock Movement
220 200 180 160 140 120 100
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
80 60 40 20 0
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Q2 FY11 Q3 FY11 Q4 FY11 Q1 FY12 Q2 FY12 Operating Income 993.4 818.6 860.3 869.0 894.4 948.5 1,050.1 Growth (%) - YoY 17.9% 9.3% 22.9% -10.1% -10.0% 15.9% 22.1% OPBDIT 223.0 141.5 148.2 132.2 132.3 186.2 238.1 PAT 137.2 50.4 73.5 44.1 61.7 77.1 79.4 OPBDIT/OI (%) 22.4% 17.3% 17.2% 15.2% 14.8% 19.6% 22.7% PAT/OI (%) 13.8% 6.2% 8.5% 5.1% 6.9% 8.1% 7.6% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore; Note: During FY11, the Agri and Performance Polymers business was demerged from the company.
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
North American market. This segment, which had witnessed changes in consumer demand and delays in their submission approvals, as also slowdown in commercialization of products of key customers, is expected to resume normalized operations with more focus on business development by the company. DDDS: Jubilant has been undertaking drug discovery in Structural Biology, Insilico Technologies and Medicinal Chemistry. Its drug development activities pertain to clinical research from Phase I to Phase IV including clinical trials and data management in Oncology, CVS, CNS, Dermatology, Respiratory and Allergy Immunotherapy. The company has been running 17 integrated research programmes in collaboration with 7 global clients.
ICRA LIMITED
LUPIN LIMITED Growth momentum continues in key market; EBITDA margins improve but higher tax outgo impacts net profits
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,510.2 297.3 41.3 7.8 3.4 251.6 23.7 224.0 Q3 FY12 1,818.9 20.4% 373.5 57.6 8.6 3.3 310.6 70.1 235.1 20.5% 12.9% Q2 FY12 1,772.4 23.6% 404.0 52.2 6.6 1.6 346.8 75.1 266.9 22.8% 15.1%
ICRA Ratings
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]AA+ [ICRA]A1+ Stable
OPBDIT/OI (%) 19.7% PAT/OI (%) 14.8% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Lupins operating income at Rs. 1,818.9 crore in Q3 FY12 reported a strong growth of 20.4% on a YoY basis driven by steady growth momentum across geographies with India formulations and US branded business reporting stronger growth. During the quarter, the companys US business grew by 12% (in US$ terms) driven by strong growth in companys branded business which grew by 18% riding on back of strong uptake in Suprax franchises and in some recovery in Anthrax sales. The companys US generics business however reported muted 9% growth (in $ terms) despite new product introductions. The management however remains upbeat about the growth prospects in the US generics going forward given the series of product launches expected especially with some of them being on limited competition and in the OCs segment. The domestic formulations business was best among the pack, reporting a 30% growth on back of recovery in Anti-infective and continued growth in CVS, diabetic and gynecology therapies. The tie-up with Eli Lilly also boosted the growth in the domestic market contributing Rs. 27-30 crore (or 7% to growth) during the quarter. In Japan, the companys revenues grew by 22% (in yen terms) aided by the consolidation of Irom revenues for a month. Management indicated that the growth on an organic basis has been somewhat muted in Japan owing to increased competition from MNCs players but believes that measures being implemented by the Government would continue to support demand for generics. Profitability In terms of profitability, despite forex loss (Rs. 32 crore), Lupins EBITDA margins at 20.5% improved by 85 bps on YoY basis driven primarily by improvement in gross margins on account of better product mix However, due to increased depreciation (due to Indore SEZ) and higher tax outgo (due to discontinuation of EOU benefits at Goa and Mandideep), the company net profit at Rs. 235.1 crore grew by only 4.9% over the same quarter in the previous year.
Stock Movement
550.0 500.0 450.0 400.0 350.0 300.0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
Europe 4%
Volume
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 1,328.2 1,334.3 Growth (%) - YoY 24.3% 21.2% OPBDIT 292.4 284.4 PAT 220.7 196.3 OPBDIT/OI (%) 22.0% 21.3% PAT/OI (%) 16.6% 14.7% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
NATCO PHARMA LIMITED Success in niche Para IV/FTF opportunities in the US Generics space holds long-term growth potential
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 118.3 24.3 3.3 3.7 0.3 17.6 4.8 13.7 Q3 FY12 145.4 22.9% 31.2 4.1 5.8 0.4 21.6 5.0 17.0 21.4% 11.7% Q2 FY12 133.0 4.4% 30.1 4.0 6.1 1.6 21.5 5.8 15.9 22.6% 12.0%
ICRA Ratings
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]A+ [ICRA]A1+ Stable
OPBDIT/OI (%) 20.5% PAT/OI (%) 11.6% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Natco Pharmas Q3 FY12 operating income at Rs. 145.4 crore grew by a strong 22.9% on YoY basis driven by strong growth in both formulations as well as bulk drugs business. Natco Pharma largely operates in the domestic formulations business and has leading presence in the oncology segment. Besides formulations, the company also has presence in the API (largely exports driven) segment to generic players. Through a focused product portfolio comprising of niche Para IV & FTF opportunities, the company is also targeting the US generics space through tie-ups with leading generic major. While in the near term, we expect, the companys dominant presence in the domestic oncology segment to drive growth, the companys ongoing investments to supports its US generics foray is likely drive growth in the medium term. Over the past few quarters, the growth momentum in the domestic market has been slowing down largely on account of increasing competitive intensity in the oncology space, which has prompted sharp price erosion for the main molecules of the company. The API business, however, continues to report healthy growth riding on back of product portfolio expansion. Profitability In terms of profitability indicators, NPLs operating margins continue to remain stable (despite pricing pressures in the formulations business) and comparable with some of leading branded generics companies in the domestic formulations segment. The companys backward integration into APIs and relatively high profitability in the oncology segment continues to support high margins. However, NPLs RoCE (%) at 17% (in 2010-11) is comparatively lower to domestic formulations peers due to investments in a group company and R&D/product filings, which are yet to yield returns.
Stock Movement
350 300 250 200 150 100 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Formulations 51%
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
Volume
May-11
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 128.4 122.4 Growth (%) - YoY -4.6% 8.2% OPBDIT 24.0 21.1 PAT 15.0 10.6 OPBDIT/OI (%) 18.7% 17.2% PAT/OI (%) 11.7% 8.7% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
ICRA LIMITED
ORCHID CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Orchid Chemicals posts consolidated loss of Rs 11.1 crore in Q3; one time forex loss impacts performance
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) OPBDIT/OI (%) 131.3 32.2 27.1 3.0 3.7 78.6 19.0 59.6 27.4% 478.6 Q3 FY12 496.9 3.8% 129.0 38.3 49.6 0.0 -49.1 -7.9 3.2 -11.1 26.0% -2.2% Q2 FY12 419.5 9.9% 105.9 36.0 40.1 0.0 -86.4 -56.6 0.0 23.4 25.2% 5.6%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
Revenue Growth In Q3FY12, on a consolidated basis, Orchids revenues stood at Rs. 496.9 crore, up by 3.8% on YoY basis and 18.4% on QoQ basis. In this quarter, Orchids revenues continued to witness a healthy growth mainly driven by the long term supply contracts with MNC clients which contribute nearly ~40% of the companys top line. As such, the API business which contributes over ~70% of the revenues of the company; grew by 7.1% YoY to Rs.353.3 crore. As for the formulations business, Orchid maintained its growth momentum aided by key launches in the oral formulations segment; with the revenues for the formulations business higher by 26.3% at Rs.114.0 crore. Profitability During the quarter, Orchids EBIDTA on a consolidated basis was Rs.129.0 crore as against Rs.131.3 crore for the corresponding quarter in previous year. While the EBIDTA margin was 26.0% as against 27.4% in Q3FY11. In Q3FY12, the company made a one-time foreign exchange loss of Rs. 49.0 crore after raising external commercial borrowings of $100 million to repay foreign currency convertible bonds maturing in February. Higher interest charges due to the hardening of interest rates coupled with the exchange loss on outstanding foreign currency loans have impacted the bottom line of the company. At a consolidated level, the company made a net loss of Rs.11.1 crore as against a net profit of Rs. 56.6 crore in Q3FY11. Developments-. Recently in Feb12, Orchid received USFDA approval for its ANDA for Levofloxacin tablets (bacterial infections). Also Orchid has successfully completed in Europe a Phase I trial of its orally administered PDE4 (phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor) molecule OCID 2987 positioned for the treatment of inflammatory disorders.
Stock Movement
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Apr-11 Feb-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
Volumes
Q4 FY10 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT PAT OPBDIT/OI (%) PAT/OI (%) 327.2 -16.6% 223.2 -103.6 68.2% -31.7%
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA Ratings
Short Term Rating [ICRA]A1+
Revenue Growth Ranbaxys Q4 CY11 revenues at Rs. 3,792.3 crore grew by 78% on YoY basis led primarily by sales of Lipitor in the US. Apart from US, which benefitted from the launch of Lipitor and Caduet, companys India formulations business and Africa were the only other two markets which witnessed growth during the quarter. While the growth in the domestic market at 8.9% (in CY11) was lower than the industry average owing largely to higher exposure on the anti-infective segment, the management expects the market to recover going forward. All other markets either witnessed a decline or flattish sales (in $ terms) during the quarter. Overall, the growth is likely to be driven by the US market (led by Lipitor) in the near term as growth prospects remain relatively subdued in other key markets. Profitability Ranbaxys Q4 CY11 operating margins at 22.7% were significantly better on YoY and QoQ basis largely driven by higher proportion of sales from exclusivity on Lipitor. Given the exclusivity is likely to continue in Q1 CY12 and part of the next quarter, the companys margins in the near term are likely to remain higher than base business margins. For the longer run, management remains confident on improving its margins profile and bringing it line with its peers in the next 3-4 years time frame though we believe that stringent norms of the consent decree, forfeiture of exclusivities on three FTFs and higher regulatory cost could impede the margin improvement. Developments During the quarter, Ranbaxy entered into a consent decree with the US FDA (also approved by the District Court) which requires the company to strengthen procedures for ensuring data integrity in its applications. The consent decree also requires the company forfeit three of its FTFs and also pay a hefty fine. As a result, the company provided $500 million towards the same, which coupled with heavy forex losses resulted in a loss of Rs. 2,982.8 crore at net level.
OPBDIT/OI (%) 10.8% PAT/OI (%) -4.4% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Others 11%
Stock Movement
600 500 400 300 200 100
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
India 20%
Volume
Q1 CY10
Q2 CY10
Q3 CY10
Operating Income 2,761.5 2,150.5 1,934.7 Growth (%) - YoY 75.4% 14.4% 2.6% OPBDIT 983.9 416.8 138.6 PAT 960.6 325.7 307.9 OPBDIT/OI (%) 35.6% 19.5% 7.2% PAT/OI (%) 34.9% 15.5% 16.2% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore; * Derived from full year financials
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED Taros strong operating performance and favourable forex augment profitability
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Net Interest Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 1,561.7 440.5 80.5 (32.2) 25.8 418.1 54.5 350.2 Q3 FY12 2,145.1 37.4% 963.8 77.4 (59.1) (86.3) 859.1 63.4 668.3 44.9% 31.2% Q2 FY12 1,894.6 13.2% 784.0 66.8 (41.7) 76.5 835.5 128.1 597.7 41.4% 31.5%
ICRA Ratings
Not Rated by ICRA
28.2% OPBDIT/OI (%) 22.4% PAT/OI (%) Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates
Revenue Growth Sun Pharmas Q3 FY12 revenues at Rs. 2,145.1 crore grew by a strong 37.4% driven by Taros strong operating performance and steady growth across key markets including India and RoW. The companys US business which accounts for over 48% of the consolidated turnover was the leading growth driver, reporting an increase of 47.0% (in $ terms). The growth was primarily driven by Taro which benefited from increased selling prices on select products even as overall volumes remained flat. Taro reported revenues of $148 million, reflecting a growth of 44.0% on YoY basis. Apart from US, the growth in the India market at 17% (excluding the discontinuation of third party manufacturing) continued to remain steady aided by companys pole position in many of the fast-growing chronic therapies. With the highest number of ANDA applications pending approval, potential Para IVs and niche opportunities, Sun Pharma is well placed to witness steady growth in the medium. Additionally, its strong position in the domestic market and focus on emerging markets are also likely to add to the growth momentum. Profitability The companys OPBDIT margins at 44.9% in Q3 FY12 improved sharply on both sequentially and on YoY basis largely driven by higher margins in Taro (50.3% in Q3 FY12) and inventory translation gains. With $62 million in net profits, Taro was the principal contributor to the 91% growth in Sun Pharmas net profit of Rs. 668.3 crore. With sharp improvement in profitability largely coming in from price increases in select products in the US and favourable currency movement, the impact of this may not be sustainable going forward and earnings may return to base level going forward barring the impact of one-off gains on exclusivities.
APIs 9%
Stock Movement
700.0 600.0 500.0 400.0 300.0 200.0 100.0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Feb-11 Apr-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
US Generics 39%
Volume
Source: Company Data Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 1,080.1 1,365.1 Growth (%) YoY -4.8% 77.7% OPBDIT 418.5 616.0 PAT 394.5 564.3 OPBIT/OI (%) 38.7% 45.1% PAT/OI (%) 36.5% 41.3% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore; Q2 FY11 1,370.1 15.6% 467.0 503.7 34.1% 36.8% Q3 FY11 1,561.7 56.8% 440.5 350.2 28.2% 22.4% Q4 FY11 1,463.3 35.5% 443.6 442.8 30.3% 30.3% Q1 FY11 1,635.7 19.8% 547.4 501.0 33.5% 30.6% Q2 FY12 1,894.6 38.3% 784.0 597.7 41.4% 31.5%
ICRA LIMITED
Business Overview
Sun Pharma (Sun) is a leading Indian pharmaceutical company engaged in developing, manufacturing and marketing formulations and APIs. Its business is broadly categorized in four segments India Branded Generics, US Formulations, International Generics and APIs. The company has strong branded generics business in India, which accounts for 41% of the consolidated turnover. In the domestic market, Sun has market leadership in as much as seven therapy segment largely in the fast-growing chronic segments. As on December 2011, the company held a market share of 4.5% (as per AIOCD data) in the Indian formulations market. Over the past five years, the companys revenues growth at a CAGR of 19.1% ahead of the underlying market growth. Higher than industry average growth has been aided by companys strong focus on fast-growing chronic therapeutic segments, its focused field force catering to specialist doctors and other initiatives such as in licensing of branded products. To pursue growth opportunities in the anti-diabetic segment, the company has recently entered into a JV with Merck to co-market Mercks diabetes drugs sitagliptin and sitagliptin plus metformin. Apart from India, U.S. is the second most important market for Sun, contributing 39% to revenues. Driven by acquisitions, ramp-up in ANDAs pipeline and Para IV opportunities, U.S. has been key growth driver for the company with 44% CAGR growth in revenues. In Sept. 2010, Sun acquired Taro Pharmaceuticals, an Israeli based generic pharmaceutical company with the objective to strengthen presence in the US generics space. The acquisition of both Caraco and Taro has allowed the company to diversified its presence across therapy areas and emerge as a strong player in the U.S. market. As on December 2011, the company had 389 ANDA filings with 148 pending approval. Apart from India and US, Sun is looking to enhance its presence in other markets especially Europe, Latin America, Russia and CIS. At present, these markets, collectively account for 11% of companys turnover and have grown at a CAGR of 34.1% over the past five years (FY06-11). Going forward, the company aims to strengthen its presence in these markets through focus on chronic segments and differentiated (i.e. non-orals, controlled released substances etc.) products. In line with recent trends, Sun has also entered into a JV with Merck to market branded generics in emerging markets. Sun is expected to develop and manufacturing, while Merck would leverage on its regulatory and marketing expertise. Despite volatility in earnings, Sun maintains one of the strongest margins profile and robust balance sheet among Indian peers. With sizeable cash reserves, company is well positioned to pursue in-organic investments and support its R&D pipeline to target the emerging complex generics opportunities in developed markets. Delay in resolution at Caraco and a potential damages pertaining to the ongoing litigation over Protonix are key sensitivities to companys earnings profile over the medium, which is characterized by strong US generics pipeline and strengthening position in the US as well other emerging markets by virtue of its acquisition of Taro Pharma and JV with Merck.
ICRA LIMITED
TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Revenue growth driven by international operations; revival of domestic business remains key
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%) - YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) 577.5 115.0 16.1 3.5 1.8 97.2 20.3 76.9 Q3 FY12 696.6 20.6% 121.5 19.7 0.2 2.3 104.0 20.1 83.2 Q2 FY12 683.3 17.5% 140.7 20.1 2.9 4.3 121.9 21.2 100.0 20.6% 14.6%
ICRA Ratings
Long Term Short Term Outlook [ICRA]AA [ICRA]A1+ Positive
OPBDIT/OI (%) 19.9% 17.4% PAT/OI (%) 13.3% 11.9% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
Revenue Growth TPLs operating income grew by 20.6% on a YoY basis in Q3 FY12 to Rs. 696.6 crore driven primarily by robust growth of 33% from international operations, partially aided by favourable currency movement. The sales growth was, however, moderated by the subdued performance (8% YoY growth) of the domestic formulations business primarily due to relatively low performance in the acute therapy segment on account of increasing competitive pressures. Nonetheless, the management has guided to a sharp recovery in domestic revenues in the coming quarters led by improved product focus through 15% expansion in field force to 3,000 medical representatives. US and Brazil markets are the key contributors to the growth in international business. While US operations witnessed a revenue growth of 67% YoY (50% in constant currency terms) led by the launch of Donepezil ODT, the 27% YoY (19% in constant currency terms) growth in Brazilian operations was facilitated by increased contribution from new product launches. TPL plans to launch three-four new products in Brazil in the coming two quarters, which should further enhance its growth. Profitability TPLs EBITDA margin at 17.4% in Q3 FY12 witnessed a decline of 247 bps on YoY basis led by forex loss of Rs. 18 crore compared to a forex gain of Rs. 7 crore in Q3 FY11. The lower DEPB benefits further impacted the OPBDITA margin to the extent of 1%. However, the same was moderated to a certain extent by reduced interest expenses on account of replacement of high-cost rupee loans as well as higher returns on surplus funds. Developments TPL has filed three ANDAs in US taking the cumulative count to 65, of which 34 have been approved till date. The company has also announced a capex plan of Rs. 200-250 crore for FY13 for API and formulation capacity expansion at Dahej SEZ.
Stock Movement
700 650 600 550 500 450 400 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jun-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Jul-11
Mar-11
Feb-12
Volumes
May-11
Q4 FY10 Q1 FY11 Operating Income 475.3 541.0 Growth (%) - YoY 17.4% 12.5% OPBDIT 96.9 112.1 PAT 59.1 74.2 OPBDIT/OI (%) 20.4% 20.7% PAT/OI (%) 12.4% 13.7% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
Mar-12
Aug-11
Jan-12
ICRA LIMITED
UNICHEM LABORATORIES LIMITED Margin pressure to continue in the domestic formulations business; net profit declines
Q3 FY11 Operating Income Growth (%)-YoY OPBDIT Less: Depreciation Less: Interest Charges Other Income Exceptional Gain/Loss PBT Less: Tax PAT (Concern Share) OPBDIT/OI (%) 39.4 6.9 0.2 1.3 0.0 33.6 8.0 25.6 20.0% 197.1 Q3 FY12 222.6 12.9% 36.8 6.7 0.4 2.1 0.0 31.8 7.3 24.5 16.5% 11.0% Q2 FY12 198.8 -1.6% 30.5 6.9 0.2 26.0 0.0 26.0 6.9 19.1 15.3% 9.6%
ICRA Ratings
Short Term [ICRA]A1+
Revenue Growth In Q3 FY12, Unichems revenues grew by 12.7% YoY to Rs.222.6 crore mainly driven by the export formulations business which witnessed a robust growth of 83.8% aided by the commencement of CRAMS contract with a U.S. MNC for 3 products and strong demand for APIs. However, the domestic formulations business; which is the main business segment; continued to be under pressure as revenues declined by 6.1% on YoY basis led by restructuring in the distribution channel and growth erosion in top brands. Among the top 10 brands of the company, 6 brands reported a negative YoY growth. The ongoing shift in the inventory rationalization efforts at the distributor level would continue to drag the sales for next 2-3 quarters before the business stabilizes. On a consolidated basis, the major subsidiary of Unichem, Niche Generics U.K continued to report losses at PAT level and the breakeven is still some time away. Profitability Unichems EBITDA margins continued to be under pressure as it fell by 344 bps YoY basis to 16.5% due to decline in sales from high margin domestic formulations business, increase in overhead costs and commissioning of new manufacturing facilities at Sikkim and Baddi. However, on QoQ basis, EBIDTA margins expanded by 120 bps on the back of depreciation of rupee vis-a vis other currencies. The net profit for Q3 FY12 stood at Rs.24.5 crore lower by 4% compared to corresponding quarter previous year. Developments The Company has signed a contract with a US customer to supply formulations from the Ghaziabad plant. This may generate revenue of Rs.100 crore in FY13. Company has also filed 2 ANDA in US in Q3 FY12, taking the cumulative filings to 23 ANDA with 11 approvals. The company is planning a capex spend of Rs. 40 crore in Q4FY12 and Rs. 100 crore in FY13.
Stock Movement
250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Apr-11 Feb-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Jul-11 Mar-11 Feb-12 May-11 Mar-12 Aug-11 Jan-12
100 80 60 40 20
0
Volumes
Q4 FY10
Q1 FY11
Operating Income 173.8 187.5 Growth (%) - YoY 18.8% 10.7% OPBDIT 41.5 48.2 PAT 33.9 33.3 OPBDIT/OI (%) 23.9% 25.7% PAT/OI (%) 19.5% 17.8% Source: Company Data, ICRA Estimates; Amounts in Rs. Crore
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA LIMITED
ICRA Limited
An Associate of Moody's Investors Service CORPORATE OFFICE nd Building No. 8, 2 Floor, Tower A; DLF Cyber City, Phase II; Gurgaon 122 002 Tel: +91 124 4545300; Fax: +91 124 4545350 Email: info@icraindia.com, Website: www.icra.in REGISTERED OFFICE th 1105, Kailash Building, 11 Floor; 26 Kasturba Gandhi Marg; New Delhi 110001 Tel: +91 11 23357940-50; Fax: +91 11 23357014 Branches: Mumbai: Tel.: + (91 22) 24331046/53/62/74/86/87, Fax: + (91 22) 2433 1390 Chennai: Tel + (91 44) 2434 0043/9659/8080, 2433 0724/ 3293/3294, Fax + (91 44) 2434 3663 Kolkata: Tel + (91 33) 2287 8839 /2287 6617/ 2283 1411/ 2280 0008, Fax + (91 33) 2287 0728 Bangalore: Tel + (91 80) 2559 7401/4049 Fax + (91 80) 559 4065 Ahmedabad: Tel + (91 79) 2658 4924/5049/2008, Fax + (91 79) 2658 4924 Hyderabad: Tel +(91 40) 2373 5061/7251, Fax + (91 40) 2373 5152 Pune: Tel + (91 20) 2552 0194/95/96, Fax + (91 20) 553 9231
Copyright, 2011 ICRA Limited. All Rights Reserved. Contents may be used freely with due acknowledgement to ICRA. All information contained herein has been obtained by ICRA from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Although reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information herein is true, such information is provided 'as is' without any warranty of any kind, and ICRA in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any such information. All information contained herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and ICRA shall not be liable for any losses incurred by users from any use of this publication or its contents.
ICRA LIMITED