Physics World Sample Issue
Physics World Sample Issue
Physics World Sample Issue
com
Quantum frontiers
Peering into an ever weirder world
A PA S S I O N F O R P E R F E C T I O N
Well matched teamwork to generate UHV Long lifetime and long maintenance intervals No dust and no wear
Are you looking for a perfect vacuum solution? Please contact us: Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH Headquarters/Germany T +49 6441 802-0 F +49 6441 802-1202 info@pfeiffer-vacuum.de www.pfeiffer-vacuum.com
iStockphoto/pixhook
Indistinguishable electrons Neutrons on demand How many dominoes would topple a cathedral? Mobile networks map rainfall A double-helix archive
Quanta Frontiers
3 4 6
Panel opts for RHIC closure NASA joins ESA dark-energy mission Chu resigns as US energy secretary Canadian astronaut joins quantum venture 71bn for 10-year graphene project New institutes join online physics course Cumbria ditches nuclear-waste plan South Korea launches science satellite China unveils 16 mega projects New lab for UKs NPL Study finds evidence of duplicate grant submissions Croatia passes science reforms LAquila judge publishes verdict
Feedback
Random universe? a quantum problem 29
I Bloch, MPQ
Letters about networking and the state of physics education in India, plus comments from physicsworld.com on human hearing
19
Quantum frontiers
Critical Point Forum
The quantum moment Robert P Crease Agreeing to disagree Maximilian Schlosshauer
25 29 30 35 42 47 52
Vlatko Vedral reminds us of the long-standing big unanswered questions about quantum physics and rounds up the latest developments in quantum research
A novel paradigm for studying the quantum world, known as weak measurement, Ultracold atoms quantum simulators 4751 has steadily been gaining hold over the last 20 years. Aephraim Steinberg, Amir Feizpour, Lee Rozema, Dylan Mahler and Alex Hayat outline its exciting potential
Jim Al-Khalili reveals our latest understanding of DNA mutation on the molecular level, which looks to involve quantum tunnelling as a fundamental first step
Immanuel Bloch describes how recent experiments with ultracold atoms bring us closer to realizing Richard Feynmans dream of a universal quantum simulator
physics
Quantum communication is set to enter space, as groups around the world pursue the concept of a quantum satellite, write Thomas Jennewein and Brendon Higgins Learn with Leonard Susskind Freeman Dysons iconoclastic career Web life: The Quantum Exchange
Physics World is published monthly as 12issues per annual volume by IOP Publishing Ltd, Temple Circus, Temple Way, Bristol BS1 6HG, UK United States Postal Identification Statement Physics World (ISSN 0953-8585) is published monthly by IOPPublishing Ltd, Temple Circus, Temple Way, Bristol BS16HG, UK. Air freight and mailing in the USA by Publications Expediting,Inc., 200 Meacham Ave, Elmont NY 11003. Periodicals postage at Jamaica NY 11431. US Postmaster: send address changes to Physics World, IOPPublishing, PO Box 320, Congers, NY 10920-0320, USA.
ld wor
Reviews
59 67 81 84
1
Soft landings: the skills you didnt know you had All the latest graduate vacancies and courses
Quanta
For the record Graphene is just a bambina
University of Manchester physicist Andre Geim quoted in the Financial Times Although graphene is expected to transform a range of industries such as electronics, aerospace and energy, Geim says it could take another 40 years before the material makes it into consumer products.
It is so distressing that even Stephen Hawking gets more attention for his views on space aliens than his views on nuclear weapons
Lawrence Krauss from Arizona State University writing in the New York Times Krauss warns that scientists voices are not being heard in debates over climate change and nuclear proliferation.
I dont want everything to be clear I want to confuse people a little so that they go away and read a book
University of Manchester physicist Brian Cox quoted in the Daily Telegraph Cox says that he tried to get more physics into his new TV series Wonders of Life but the production team wanted the programme to be accessible to a wider audience.
Physics has been fortunate in recent years to have benefited from gifted TV presenters, firing the beauty of the subject direct into peoples livingrooms
Peter Knight , president of the Institute of Physics, quoted in the Daily Telegraph Knight says physics has benefited from its geekchic image, helped by the likes of Brian Cox.
It seems that US rapper GZA (also known to his fans as The Genius) has taken to physics. A founding member of hiphop legends the Wu-Tang Clan, GZA is putting the finishing touches to his new Stars in their eyes Here is one little creature that didnt make album Dark Matter a record he says is partially inspired by quantum physics. it into our recent special issue on animal GZA (real name Gary Grice) apparently physics. The dung beetle apparently uses got the idea for the album on a visit to both the Sun and the Moon to orientate Harvard Universitys science centre itself as it rolls its balls of muck along the and has even teamed up with Columbia ground. But the big mystery in the dungUniversity education expert Christopher beetle world was why the insect can still Emdin to create science genius battles navigate when the Moon is absent from the nights sky. Biologist Marie Dacke and a programme fusing hip-hop and science to help make physics more accessible to colleagues at the University of Lund in Sweden have now shown that dung beetles students. Get ready for a whole new wave of physics-based raps. actually use the Milky Way to orientate themselves. The researchers came to this surprising conclusion after putting dung More milk, more prizes beetles in the Johannesburg Planetarium First came the surprising in South Africa and then simulating conclusion that chocolate the night sky, which showed that the consumption can increase insects use the light from stars to move a nations chance of in a straight path. So is that dung beetles producing Nobel prize sorted then? Not quite. They still offer winners (see January p3). many more riddles waiting to be solved, Now Sarah Linthwaite Dacke reckons. from Gloucestershire Royal Hospital in the UK claims that it is actually milk consumption that is the key (Pract. Neurol. Snow patrol 13 63). Linthwaite found what she says You might not think the World Economic is a positive correlation between milk Forum in Davos would have particle consumption and the number of Nobel physics high on its agenda, but it was the prizes per capita. Sweden tops the list, talking point at this years annual shindig of political and business elites in the Swiss getting through 340kg of milk every year per person (and has the most Nobel Alps. Punters at Davos were particularly drawn to CERN boss Rolf-Dieter Heuers laureates per capita) whereas China only consumes around 25kg per person talk about how the labs management structure could be applied to organizations every year (and has the fewest laureates per head). So to improve your chances such as the International Monetary Fund of winning Nobel prizes, the authors and the European Central Bank. The conclude, you should not only eat more international realpolitik of Davos has more in common with the quantum worlds, chocolate but perhaps drink milk too; or strive for synergy with hot chocolate. where subatomic particles can occupy different sates simultaneously, says Anne Richards, chief investment officer at When two become one Aberdeen Asset Management who had a And finally, we couldnt resist bringing three-year spell as a CERN research fellow you details of Destinys Childs latest in the 1980s. However, the rarefied Alpine compilation Love Songs, which includes air probably went a bit to Heuers head the new song Nuclear. When the two as he offered this analogy of the Higgs become one on a quantum level, Beyonc, boson to the Associated Press. Suppose Kelly and Michelle sing, its nuclear. the Higgs boson is a special snowflake, so With you here, we both heat up. Maybe it you have to identify the snowflakes, in a should have been a duet for Alice and Bob?
Frontiers
In brief
Diamond downsizes MRI and NMR
Magnetic-resonance-imaging technology has been shrunk to the nanoscale by two independent teams of researchers in Germany and the US, so that molecular samples just a few cubic nanometres in volume can now be detected and imaged at room temperature. Both groups used nitrogen-vacancy (NV) defects in diamonds as magnetic-field sensors to probe such minute samples. NV defects occur when two neighbouring carbon atoms in diamonds are replaced by a nitrogen atom and an empty lattice site. NV sites are capable of detecting the very weak oscillatory magnetic fields that come from the spins of protons in a sample. Apart from being able to resolve a single atom at room temperature, the technique could be used as a polarizing agent for traditional NMR and could also help the nanotechnology community image tiny devices (Science 339 557; 339 561).
Silicon nanoparticles could be used to produce hydrogen almost instantly, as they react with water, according to researchers in the US. The reaction does not require any heat, light or electricity and the hydrogen generated could be used to power small fuel cells. In essence, the technique recovers some of the energy that goes into refining the silicon and producing the nanoparticles in the first place. Thanks to their high surface-to-volume ratio, the nanoparticles should naturally generate hydrogen much more quickly than bulk silicon. The advantage of silicon is that it is abundant on our planet, has a high energy density and does not release any carbon dioxide when it reacts with water. The researchers have already successfully tested their technique in a small fuel cell that they used to power a fan (Nano Lett. 10.1021/nl304680w).
A new method to produce indistinguishable and coherent electrons has been developed by scientists in France. They have used it to make a small, electron-emitting chip that can produce two single electrons emitted from different sources that are in the same quantum state. This is a key step in developing electron-based quantuminformation-processing techniques. Electrons are fermions and so must obey Paulis exclusion principle, which prevents identical fermions from occupying the same state, and so leads to anticorrelations or antibunching. Erwann Bocquillon and Gwendal Fve at the Ecole Normale Suprieure in Paris and Lyon, along with colleagues from the Laboratory for Photonics and Nanostructures, Paris, wanted to see if indistinguishable electrons could be generated by independent sources. But as there are many electrons in any system, and they all interfere with each other and with the environment, making coherent electron beams is difficult. The researchers electron-emitting chip
(pictured) was built using a very clean micron-sized bulk-semiconductor sample in which the electrons propagate in straight lines for several microns in 2D before being scattered, limiting their interactions. A strong magnetic field is then used to further restrict the movement of the electrons to only 1D so that single electrons may be guided to each of the emitters. By applying a voltage pulse to metallic electrodes deposited on top of the emitters, the researchers trigger the emission of a single electron to an electronic beamsplitter that is made up of two input and two output arms. Fve says that their sample is capable of emitting billions of single electrons per second one electron per nanosecond. The two sources are perfectly synchronized such that both particles arrive simultaneously on the splitter and perfect antibunching occurs, meaning the two electrons always exit in different outputs, explains Fve. That means that the two electrons, generated by the two identical, synchronized emitters would arrive simultaneously at the two input arms of the splitter and would always emerge in two distinct outputs, obeying Paulis principle. But Fve is quick to point out that while the team did achieve a high degree of indistinguishability, some minimal environmental interaction did occur. The team is looking at making its sample even smaller so that the electrons travel even shorter distances, while keeping in mind the effects of temperature at such sizes (Science 10.1126/science.1232572). doped with deuterium atoms that was positioned 5mm in front of a secondary target made from beryllium. Even though the pulses delivered less than a quarter of the energy employed in previous experiments, they produced neut rons that were nearly 10 times as energetic up to 150MeV and nearly 10 times as numerous. The group took the first radiographs using this beam by placing a series of tungsten, steel and plastic objects between the neutron source and a scintillating fibre array that was linked to a CCD camera. Roth says that although his groups device produces fewer neutrons than reactors or accelerators do, it packs the neutrons into pulses each lasting just 10 8s. This makes it suitable for applications that need high temporal resolution. Roth claims that, once commercialized, the entire device would fit on a lab bench and that only the target would need shielding (Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 044802).
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Neutrons on demand
A new compact high-flux source of energetic neutrons has been built by physicists in Germany and the US. The laser-based device has the potential to be cheaper and more convenient than the large neutron facilities currently used by scientists and could be housed in university laboratories. Built by Markus Roth of the Technische Universitt Darmstadt and colleagues at Los Alamos and Sandia national laboratories, the device builds on previous research carried out at Los Alamos in 2006, which used computer simulations to show that an intense laser beam can penetrate a thin solid target, producing the necessary highenergy neutron flux. Roths team directed extremely powerful and well-defined pulses from the Los Alamos TRIDENT nm-thick plastic target laser onto a 400
Physicists in the UK have come up with a new way of storing a handful of photons in an ultracold atomic gas, in which strong interactions between neighbouring photons can be switched on and off using microwaves. Once stored, the photons can be made to interact strongly, before being released again. An important feature of the technique is that it uses microwaves, which are also used to control some types of stationary qubit. The team believes that the technique could be used to create optical logic gates in which single photons could be processed one at a time. The method could also prove useful for connecting quantum-computing devices based on different technologies (arXiv:1207.6007v3). Read these articles in full and sign up for free e-mail news alerts at physicsworld.com
D Dar son
Frontiers
Innovation
are sent from one tower to the next. Signals passing through falling raindrops are partly absorbed by the water molecules and also get scattered slightly, lowering the power that reaches the receiving tower. The more raindrops in the beams path or the larger the drops are the more signal power is lost. By comparing received powers for each network link with reference values for known dry periods and factoring in humidity and the water films that can develop on the communications antennae the researchers were able to calculate the rainfall densities along each path. These values were then treated as point measurements at the centre of each network link and used to extrapolate the larger rain-distribution maps. In the frequencies employed in these links, attenuation caused by raindrops are the only main source of power reductions, apart from free space losses (PNAS 10.1073/pnas.1217961110).
to sacrifice proved difficult. If we close the RHIC now, we cede all collider leadership and not just the high-energy collider to CERN and we lose the scientific discoveries that are enabled by the recent intensity and detector upgrades at the RHIC, the report notes. If we terminate FRIB construction, future leadership in the cornerstone area of nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics will be ceded to Europe and Asia. In addition a window of opportunity to construct the FRIB with significant non-federal resources pledged to the project will close and is not likely to reopen.
Fighting on
Close call
The panel finally opted to recommend closing RHIC, which has an annual budget of $160m, but admitted that losing any one of the components will cause severe and lasting damage to the field. Tribble later told Physics World that the vote was very close, although the committee decided not to publicly reveal the actual count. The US nuclear-physics community responded swiftly to the report by vowing to fight for a budget
Leaders of the nuclear-physics community, however, emphasize that the DOE and the government do not have to accept the panels recommendations. Indeed, Congress has not even determined a budget for the DOE for the current financial year. The heads of all three facilities, along with members of the nuclear-physics community and scientific societies such as the American Physical Society, have already begun a powerful effort to persuade local representatives, senators and Congress as a whole that US science will suffer in both the short and the long term without a small increase in the nuclear physics budget. The message has certainly reached leaders at the DOE. None of this bodes well for science at the rate
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
were going here, Brinkman told the subpanel in Washington at a hearing, adding that it represents permanent damage to the field. But if Congress and the Obama administration fail to avoid the looming budget cuts in the financial sequester the agreement to reduce government spending across the board if the two
sides cannot agree on a budget then the cuts look more of a reality. We didnt spend much time on sequestration, says Tribble. If it occurs, it will be such a problem in all parts of government that its impossible to know what the impact will be on nuclear physics. One concern is that the sequester
could lead to a ban on starting any new programmes at all. That could affect the FRIB, which has not yet received the necessary critical decision 2 go-ahead from the DOE. Even if that situation does not occur, the field could lose so much financial support that it might even have to close two machines rather than one. viding US-made detectors for the mission and by having US scientists working on the mission, both the European and US science communities will benefit, saysHarrington. This is not the first time that NASA and ESA have worked together on a major mission, having collaborated on the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes as well as on the Cassini and Huygens missions to Saturn and the Herschel and Planck observatories. We welcome NASAs contribution to this important endeavour, the most recent in a long history of co-operation in space science between our two agencies, says lvaro Gimnez, ESAs director of science and robotic exploration. NASA says it hopes the experience it gains on Euclid will help it with the construction of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope mission, which is planned for launch in the coming decade to study dark energy and dark matter.
Space
Helping hands NASA is expected to provide around $100m towards the European Space Agencys $800m Euclid mission, which will study dark energy and dark matter
being ordinary visible matter. The study of dark energy was identified as an important scientific question in the 2010 Decadal Survey of Astrophysics by the National Academies of Science, NASA spokesman James Harrington told Physics World. Euclid will make significant progress in understanding the nature of it. Euclid will be armed with two state-of-the-art instruments an optical visual imager and a nearinfrared spectrometer. For the infrared instrument NASA will now be providing 16 detectors, plus four spares, to the tune of $50m. NASA will be giving a further $50m to support the 54 US scientists who will now be joining the mission, the bulk from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. By pro- Gemma Lavender
the board, as did his SunShot initiative an effort to increase US use of renewable-energy technologies that began progress towards a goal of reducing the cost of solar power to $1 per watt. Secretary Chu has led the energy department at a time when our nation made the single largest investment ever in clean energy and doubled its use of renewables, stated Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters. Yet Chu also became a controversial figure, facing heavy criticism from Republicans, deniers of climate change and some members of the business community. Critics focused on occasional failures of Chus initiatives, such as Solyndra a solar-cell manufacturer that went bankrupt after receiving $535m in DOE loan
guarantees as well as A-123 Systems, an innovative battery maker that went bust before being rescued by a Chinese conglomerate. Daniel Kish, senior vice-president of the Institute for Energy Research, a Washington DC-based non-profit corporation, asserted that the emphasis on renewables has cost jobs. The policies and priorities of Chus energy department have benefited our global competitors and intensified the economic pain felt by millions of unemployed Americans, he says. Chu responded to those criticisms in his letter to DOEs employees. The truth is that only 1% of the companies we funded went bankrupt, he noted. The test for Americas policymakers will be whether they are willing to accept a few failures in exchange for many successes. The Obama administration will now nominate a successor, with the Democrat politicians Bill Ritter of Colorado, Jennifer Granholm of Michigan and Christine Gregoire of Washington state as top favourites. Yet there is a possibility that Chus successor will be another scientist: theoretical physicist Ernest Moniz of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who served as undersecretary of energy for former US president Bill Clinton.
Peter Gwynne Boston, MA
Quantum physics
Back to Earth Canadian astronaut Steve MacLean has resigned as president of the Canadian Space Agency to be involved in a new quantum-physics venture in Waterloo.
DOE
Funding
Thin future The 10-year graphene project will lead to the development of new techniques for the fabrication of graphene nanodevices as well as the integration of graphene-based opto-electronic devices.
gramme have detailed goals at the moment. These include the development of different techniques for making graphene nanodevices, the design of a graphene-based receiver unit for radio signal processing and the integration of a graphene-based opto-electronic and nano-photonic device. However, Kinaret is not concerned about the lack of targets over the whole of the 10-year project. We are doing research, not development, says Kinaret, and a defining feature of research is uncertainty. Kinaret insists, though, that the pro- Senne Starckx ject does have a number of detailed Mol, Belgium
Education
Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, and the cole Polytechnique Fdrale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Each of these schools was carefully selected for the distinct resources and not usually leading expertise and regional influence to any formal credit being awarded they bring to our growing family of by the providers. Although MOOCs edX institutions, says Agarwal. have existed for several years, the All six current edX members founders of edX say they are raising launched courses in 2012 and have the bar by building an entire opennew courses starting this spring. source platform that links some of Among the new batch is a course the worlds leading universities. A on electricity and magnetism taught typical edX course consists of learnby Walter Lewin, an MIT physicist ing sequences involving videos who already has a strong online folpresented by university academics, Watch and learn lowing through earlier recorded along with assessments and online Anant Agarwal, lectures. Other existing edX courses interactive laboratories. president of edX, has include those on quantum mechanHarvard and MIT both invested given an exclusive ics and computing taught by Berke$30m in edX early last year and were video interview to ley academic Umesh Vazirani, subsequently joined in the initiative Physics World, which and on solid-state chemistry by by the University of California at can be viewed online MIT human-genome pioneer Eric Berkeley, the University of Texas, and in our digital Lander. According to edX spokesWellesley College and Georgetown issue. person Dan OConnell, Delft has University. Now, these six institualready indicated that it will be begin tions will be joined by Rice Unioffering edX courses from autumn, versity (also in the US), McGill and including courses on solar energy Toronto universities in Canada, plus and space engineering. the Australian National University, James Dacey
UK
waste underground at depths of up to 1km because of the existing nuclear facilities at Sellafield. However, some geoscientists are opposed to underground storage in the region because it is thought to contain unstable geology such as rock fractures, which can allow the spread of waste-leeching groundwater. There are also concerns that underground waste would threaten tourism at the nearby Lake District National Park. Stuart Haszeldine, a geoscientist at the University of Edinburgh who has investigated Cumbrias suitability for underground nuclear-waste storage, told Physics World that he was pleased with the outcome. It was quite unexpected to win, he says. I didnt think Cumbria County Council would have such good judge-
Risk concerns Cumbria in the UK is already home to the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site, which closely monitors its environmental impact, but now the regions council has rejected a proposed 12bn underground nuclear-waste repository.
Space science
the target orbit of 297km by1512km. [The rocket] proved that Korea has the ability to launch a space vehicle. This space technology represents the [high] standard of our countrys science and technology, Yeong Hak Kim, a government official at the Korean ministry of education, science and technology, told Physics World. The probe was launched by Koreas Space Launch Vehicle (KSLV-1), also known as Naro, which is a two-stage carrier rocket that, when fully loaded, stands 33m tall and has a mass of around 140000kg. The first stage of the launch vehicle was designed and built by Russias Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, while the second stage was developed by the
Korea Aerospace Research Institute. The immediate scientific value of the satellite will be relatively small with the project being more of a demonstration of South Koreas growing space prowess. Indeed, North Koreas apparent success in launching a longrange rocket in January put pressure on Seoul to ensure that KSLV-1s space flight went to plan. Both countries on the Korean peninsula are now members of the exclusive group of 11 nations that have independently launched satellites from their own territory. However, South Korea will still have to make significant progress before comparisons can be drawn with other space-faring nations such as China and Japan.
Toby Brown
11
Simple
Series 12.1
Clean
Flexible
Swiss Headquarters Tel ++41 81 771 61 61 CH@vatvalve.com VAT Japan Tel (045) 333 11 44 JP@vatvalve.com
VAT Benelux Tel ++31 30 6018251 NL@vatvalve.com VAT Korea Tel 031 662 68 56 KR@vatvalve.com
VAT Germany Tel (089) 46 50 15 DE@vatvalve.com VAT China Tel 021 5854 4300 CN@vatvalve.com
VAT U.K. Tel 01926 452 753 UK@vatvalve.com VAT Singapore Tel 0065 6252 5121 SG@vatvalve.com
www.vatvalve.com
R081_121_Ad_YI0602EA_210x140.indd 1
15.01.08 17:20:25
Asia
Sidebands
NSF director quits
Materials scientist Subra Suresh has announced his resignation as director of the US National Science Foundation (NSF). In a letter to staff he said he would be leaving at the end of this month to become president of Carnegie Mellon University. Suresh, a former dean of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was appointed NSF director in October 2010 for a six-year period. In the letter he said it has been an extraordinary honour to lead the NSF, which has a budget of around $7bn. Despite the economic crisis and the lingering uncertainties that have ensued, NSF funding has sustained growth, he wrote. NSF deputy director Cora Marrett is expected to be named acting director until Sureshs replacement is found.
cutting-edge research for the seven fields so this is an important plan for China, says astrophysicist Tipei Li from Tsinghua University and the Institute of High Energy Physics in Beijing. While many other countries research budgets are decreasing, Chinas budget is increasing. Mi Xu, a senior adviser for the fast-reactor programme based at the China Institute of Atomic Energy in Beijing, agrees with the plans aims. It has given me a high level of confidence in Chinas ability to independently innovate, he told Physics World, pointing to how the country has already led the way in building a fast-neutron reactor one that can breed its own fuel located in the Fangshan District on the outskirts of Beijing (see September 2011 p9). Meanwhile, the state council meeting in January also amended four regulations regarding the enforcement of copyright law and the protection of computer software. The changes were made in an attempt to intensify a crackdown on intellectual copyright infringement and combat the manufacture and sale of counterfeit products.
Jiao Li Beijing
UK
Construction has begun on what will be Canadas largest radio telescope. The C$11m Canadian Hydrogen IntensityMapping Experiment (CHIME) in Penticton, British Columbia, is the first research telescope to be built in the country in more than 30 years. CHIME boasts a 100100m collecting area, which will be filled with 2560 low-noise receivers built with components adapted from the mobile-phone industry. Signals collected by the CHIME telescope will be digitally sampled nearly one billion times per second, then processed to produce an image of the sky. Astronomers will use the telescope to map a quarter of the observable universe to help better understand the nature of dark energy.
Bigger and better The National Physical Laboratory in Teddington, UK, will build an Advanced Metrology Laboratory to develop improved time and frequency standards.
NPL
Cash for the AML is part of a UK government initiative to target investment in eight so-called great science areas for which 460m has been allocated from a total 600m fund, originally announced last year. Other areas include 189m for big data and energy-efficient computing, 45m for new facilities and equipment for advanced materials research, as well as 50m for upgrades to research equipment andlaboratories.
Kulvinder Singh Chadha
The Chinese physicist Liangying Xu, who was a fierce advocate of democracy in China, died on 28 January at the age of 92. Xu was born in the eastern Chinese province of Zhejiang on 3 May 1920 and studied physics at Zhejiang University. He later became a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), serving as a censor for papers that were going to be sent abroad for publication. In 1957 Xu took part in the Hundred Flowers campaign to speak out over the Communist Partys failings, for which he was sent to his home village where he worked on a farm and also began translating Einsteins works. Following the death of Communist party chairman Mao Zedong in 1976, banished scientists returned from the countryside and Liangying regained his job at the CAS and subsequently published a three-volume collection of Einsteins works.
13
85595PTA5201014/07/201014:14Page1 83442PTA5201023/04/201012:29Page1
2010
3 3
Lithium
11 11
Li Li 6.941 Na Na K K
4 4
Beryllium Beryllium
2 2
19 19
22.990 22.990 0.97 0.97 97.7 97.7 Potassium Potassium 39.098 39.098 0.86 0.86 63.4 63.4 Rubidium Rubidium
85.468 1.53 1.53 39.3 39.3 Caesium Caesium
12 12
Be Be 9.0122
RESEARCHMATERIALS RESEARCHMATERIALS
20 20
24.305 24.305 1.74 1.74 650 650 Calcium Calcium 40.078 40.078 1.55 1.55 842 842
Mg Mg Ca Ca
3 3
37 37
Rb Rb 85.468 Cs
38 38
Strontium Strontium
55 55
87 87
132.91 132.91 1.88 1.88 28.4 28.4 Francium Francium [223] [223]
56 56
Barium Barium
Sr Sr 87.62
39 39
Yttrium Yttrium
Sc Sc
22 22
Titanium Titanium
4 4
Fr
88 88
Radium Radium
Ba
Ra
57-70 57-70
71 71
Lutetium Lutetium
Y Y 88.906
40 40
Zirconium Zirconium
Ti Ti
23 23
Vanadium Vanadium
5 5
89-102 89-102
**
103 103
174.97 178.49 174.97 178.49 9.84 13.31 9.84 13.31 1652 2233 1652 2233 Lawrencium Rutherfordium Rutherfordiu Lawrencium [262] [262] 1627 1627
Lu
Lr
72 72
Hafnium Hafnium
Zr Zr 91.224
41 41
Niobium Niobium
V V
24 24
Chromium Chromium
6 6
Hf Hf
73 73
Tantalum Tantalum
Nb Nb 92.906 Ta Ta
42 42
Molybdenum Molybdenum
Cr Cr
25 25
Manganese Manganese
7 7
104 104
m [265] [265]
Rf
105 105
180.95 180.95 16.65 16.65 3017 3017 Dubnium Dubnium [268] [268]
74 74
Tungsten Tungsten
Mo Mo 95.94 W W
43 43
Technetium Technetium
26 Fe Mn 26 Fe Mn 55.845
Ruthenium Ruthenium
Iron Iron
8 8
Db Db
106 106
183.84 183.84 19.25 19.25 3422 3422 Seaborgium Seaborgium [271] [271]
75 75
Rhenium Rhenium
Tc Tc [98]
44 44
Sg Sg
107 107
186.21 186.21 21.02 21.02 3186 3186 Bohrium Bohrium [272] [272]
Re Re Bh Bh
76 76
Osmium Osmium
Ru Ru 101.07 Os Os
108 108
190.23 190.23 22.61 22.61 3033 3033 Hassium Hassium [270] [270]
Hs Hs
*Lanthanoids **Actinoids
57 57
Lanthanum Lanthanum
89 89
Actinium Actinium
La La
58 58
Cerium Cerium
Ac
90 90
Thorium Thorium
Ce Ce Th Th
59 59
91 91
Protactinium Protactinium
Pr Pr
60 60
Pa Pa
92 92
Uranium Uranium
Nd Nd
61 61
Promethium Promethium
U U
93 93
Neptunium Neptunium
62 63 Pm 62 Sm 63 Eu Pm Sm Eu 150.36 151.96
Plutonium Plutonium
Samarium Samarium
Np Np
94 94
METALS & & ALLOYS ALLOYS for for Research Research // Development Development& &Industry Industry METALS
Tel + 44 1865 884440 Fax + 44 1865 884460 info@advent-rm.com info@advent-rm.com
He-3 Insert with temperatures down to 300 mK He-3 Insert for temperatures down to 300 mK Temperatures down to 50 mK with a cryogen-free Dilution Refrigerator High power Pulse Tube cryocoolers with low vibration No maintenance for 3 1/2 years continuous use High temperature option facility Flexible open LabVIEW software
UK Head Office: Cryogenic Limited Units 30 Acton Park Industrial Estate, Acton London W3 7QE, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 8743 6049 Fax: +44 (0)20 8743 6049 Email: sales@cryogenic.co.uk
1 1
2
Fluorine Fluorine
Solids&Liquids (g/cm3)Gases(g/l) Solids&Liquids (g/cm3)Gases(g/l) Meltingpoint(Solids& Liquids )Boilingpoint(Gases) Meltingpoint(Solids& Liquids )Boilingpoint(Gases)
55
Boron Boron
13 13
13 13
B B 10.811
66
Carbon Carbon
14 14
27 27
Cobalt Cobalt
9 9
45 45
Rhodium Rhodium
Co Co
28 28
Nickel Nickel
10 10
77 77
Iridium Iridium
Rh Rh 102.91 Ir Ir
46 46
Palladium Palladium
Ni Ni
29 29
Copper Copper
11 11
12 12
Zinc Zinc
30 Zn Cu 30 Zn Cu 65.39
Cadmium Cadmium
31 31
26.982 26.982 2.70 2.70 660.3 660.3 Gallium Gallium 69.723 69.723 5.90 5.90 29.8 29.8
Al Al
14 14
C C 12.011
77
Nitrogen Nitrogen
15 15
Si Si
15 15
N N 14.007 P P
88
Oxygen Oxygen
16 16
17 17
16 16
O O 15.999 S S
99
17 17
FF
10 10
Cl Cl
18 18
Ne Ne Ar Ar
36 36
39.948 39.948 1.784 1.784 -185.85 -185.85 Krypton Krypton 83.80 83.80 3.733 3.733 -153.22 -153.22 Xenon Xenon
Kr Kr Xe Xe Rn Rn
109 109
192.22 195.08 196.97 200.59 204.38 207.2 208.98 [209] [210] [222] 192.22 195.08 196.97 200.59 204.38 207.2 208.98 [209] [210] [222] 22.65 21.09 19.30 13.55 11.85 11.34 9.78 9.20 9.73 22.65 21.09 19.30 13.55 11.85 11.34 9.78 9.20 9.73 2466 1768.3 1064.2 -38.83 304 327.5 271.3 254 302 -61.85 2466 1768.3 1064.2 -38.83 304 327.5 271.3 254 302 -61.85 Meitnerium Darmstadtium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Roentgenium Copernicium Copernicium Ununtrium UnunquadiumUnunpentium Ununtrium Ununquadium Ununpentium Ununhexium Ununhexium Ununseptium Ununseptium Ununoctium Ununoctium Meitnerium [276] [276]
78 78
Platinum Platinum
Pd Pd 106.42 Pt Pt
47 47
Indium Indium
50 50
79 79
Gold Gold
Thallium Thallium
Antimony Antimony
Tellurium Tellurium
53 53
Iodine Iodine
82 82
Lead Lead
84 84
Polonium Polonium
85 Po 85 At Po At
Astatine Astatine
II
54 54
86 86
Mt Mt
110 110
[281] [281]
Ds Ds
111 111
[280] [280]
Rg Rg
112 112
[285] [285]
Cn Cn
113 113
[284] [284]
114 115 116 117 118 Uuq115 Uut 114 Uup116 Uuh117 Uus118 Uuo Uuq Uut Uup Uuh Uus Uuo [289] [288] [293] [] [294]
[289] [288] [293] [] [294]
Europium Europium
64 64
Gadolinium Gadolinium
Pu Pu
95 95
Americium Americium
Curium Curium
65 Gd 65 Tb Gd Tb 158.93
Berkelium Berkelium
Terbium Terbium
66 66
Dysprosium Dysprosium
98 98
Dy Dy Cf Cf
67 67
Holmium Holmium
68 Ho 68 Er Ho Er 167.26
Erbium Erbium
69 69
Thulium Thulium
99 99
Es Es
100 100
Fermium Fermium
70 Tm70 Yb Tm Yb 173.04
173.04 6.57 6.57 824 824
Ytterbium Ytterbium
advent-rm.com advent-rm.com
www.cryogenic.co.uk
High homogeneity cryogen free 7 Tesla magnet Completely dry or requires no re-fill of liquid helium Low maintenance Pulse Tube cryocooler AC and DC measurements with 10-8 EMU sensitivity Smooth transition across 4.2 K
Dataprovidedbykindpermissionofwww.webelements.com
Hydrogen Hydrogen
1 1
H H
ADVENT
Symbol Symbol
Helium Helium
18 18
He He
Research funding
vided documentation on 22 pairs of very similar grants. There isnt any doubt that duplication of grant applications is going on, says Garner. The doubt is about the intensity of it. Indeed, Garner suspects that his software could have missed many other cases of duplication. US research agencies are aware that there is a problem. The NSF, for example, requires notification from its grant recipients if they receive any funding for the same project from other sources. But last November, electrical engineer Craig Grimes, formerly of Pennsylvania State University, was sentenced to 41 months in prison for a series of research grant frauds that included accepting grants from the NSF and
One for the price oftwo An analysis of grant submissions carried out by Harold Garner at the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute has found examples of researchers being awarded funding from multiple sources based on the same grant application.
Croatia
want science funding to depend purely on quality and excellence measured by the number of a researchers publications and the impact those papers have. However, others say scientists in Croatia can only do better science if they have more funding and that the government should instead create a national science strategy before changing the laws. The debate, which has been rumbling for some time, was reignited by a damning study published in January by the Institute for Social Research in Zagreb of the performance of social scientists in Croatia. It found that between 1991 and 2005 more than 60% did not publish any books, while fewer than 5% published in international journals listed in Thomson Reuters Web
Most top scientists want science funding to depend purely on quality and excellence
of Science database. Marijan Herak, a geophysicist from the University of Zagreb, supports the proposals but complains about a lack of a proper bibliometric analysis before the writing of the draft reforms. If our system is going to be changed and it needs to be changed then its inefficiency should be objectively established and documented, he says. But this has not happened. Indeed, in January Herak undertook an as-yetunpublished bibliometric study of the output of Croatian scientists, which he claims shows they fare well compared with their counterparts in other developed nations in terms, for example, of the number of publications relative to total spending on science.
Mic o Tatalovic
15
Big impact Building damage in the village of Onna, near LAquila in Italy, caused by the April 2009 earthquake.
How can a trial against scientists knowledge be decided without recourse to the shared canons of international science?
the local population, leading some residents to stay indoors on the night of the quake when otherwise they would have sought refuge outside, leading to 29 deaths. Billi explains that the experts were not tried on the basis of the scientific content of their statements but instead on whether they acted with due diligence, prudence and skill. This is not a trial against science, he writes, but a trial against seven public officials...who carried out an evaluation of the seismic risk that violated the rules of analysis, forecast and prevention regulated by the law. During the trial Marcello Melandri the legal representative of geophysicist Enzo Boschi, who was another of those convicted argued that the prosecution had not properly distinguished the responsibilities of each of the seven individuals, pointing out that many of the most controversial comments were made before the meeting by just one of the indicted hydraulic engineer Bernardo De Bernardinis, who was then deputy head of the Civil Protection Department. Those comments included the notion that the swarm was positive because it discharged energy from the fault, which many witnesses in court said persuaded their relatives to stay inside on the night of the earthquake. But Billi backs the view of prosecutor Fabio Picuti, saying that De Bernardinis comments amounted to the commissions manifesto, given, he claims, their close match with other statements made during the meeting. Alessandra Stefano, representing seismic engineer Gian Michele Calvi, says that Billis reasoning is very
disappointing, arguing that it does nothing but repeat the prosecutions mistaken interpretation of the facts and of the law. Petrelli, meanwhile, argues that Billi has confused the duties of the politicians and administrators with those of the scientific consultants, and failed to evaluate the substantial difference between the scientists statements on seismic risk and what was said by the local television stations and newspapers. Petrelli also maintains that Billi, in trying to show that he had not been involved in a trial against science, has actually ended up conducting a trial without science, in which he (wrongly in Petrellis eyes) insisted on not examining the scientific content of the defendants statements. How can a trial against scientists knowledge be decided without recourse to the shared canons of international science? asks Petrelli. The appeals will be heard by three judges, who, says Stefano, might reach a verdict by the end of the autumn but whose decision, she adds, is sure to be challenged in the Supreme Court by whoever loses at the appeals stage. Petrelli says that the Supreme Court is not likely to rule on the case before the end of 2015. Meanwhile, it appears that a parallel trial against Bertolaso and Daniela Stati, who was regional councillor for civil protection at the time of the quake, will not now take place. The two had been under investigation by the prosecutors for an intercepted phone call that Bertolaso made to Stati the day before the scientists met in March 2009, in which Bertolaso referred to the media operation with which he wanted to reassure the public. Picuti and fellow prosecutor Roberta DAvolio have now requested that the investigation against the pair be terminated. Bertolaso had claimed, when giving evidence in last years trial, that his term media operation simply referred to his wish to have the scientists deliberations made known to the media, rather than spinning the science in a pre-meditated way to reassure the public. Picuti and DAvolio say this interpretation cannot be shown to be false beyond reasonable doubt as neither Bertolaso nor Stati offered any causally relevant contribution to the formation of the content and outcome of the meeting. A judge must now decide whether to accept the prosecutions request, which looks set to be opposed by quake victims relatives.
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
16
575 McCorkle Boulevard Westerville OH 43082 Phone: (614) 891-2244 Fax: (614) 818-1600 info@lakeshore.com www.lakeshore.com
Proven Cryofree
Advanced magnet technology: Proven record of custom Measurement environment: custom wiring, sample
Technical expertise supporting you all the way:
From product selection to installation and support in your laboratory.
TritonTM Top-loading dilution refrigerator Oxsoft IDK software
engineered systems
www.oxford-instruments.com/physicsworld
Feedback
Physics in India
a passion for physics among Indias top students. However, I wish that the report had included a separate article on the role of informal science communications in inspiring and inculcating the spirit of inquiry among Letters to the editor can be sent to Physics World, school students. In a country like India, Temple Circus, Temple Way, Bristol BS1 6HG, UK, or to pwld@iop.org. Please include your address and where scientific research is mostly funded a telephone number. Letters should be no more than by public money, scientists ought to 500words and may be edited. Comments on articles use the outcomes of their research for social benefit. Also, in order to attract from physicsworld.com can be posted on the talented students to science and thereby website; an edited selection appears here harness their capabilities in fostering an understanding of nature, science needs to be made attractive, accessible and comprehensible in a way that does not As a close follower of Physics World and an dilute its substance. I am the physics curator of the National aspiring science popularizer, I found your Council of Science Museums (NCSM), special report on India quite timely as it an autonomous organization under the reflects the enhanced efforts to promote Indian governments Ministry of Culture research in this country. However, the that is currently led by G S Rautela. For report reflects more of the positive more than five decades now, the NCSM changes that are happening and ignores has acted as a bridge between members some of the serious problems that India of the public and science, enhancing faces in producing a high-quality talent understanding and appreciation of science pool at the undergraduate level. and technology through a network of There are many pockets of excellence 47 hands-on and interactive science in India where high-quality research is museums and centres spread across the conducted. However, these centres of country. All NCSM units welcome people excellence are not involved in training from different walks of life, including undergraduates, and the institutions students in organized groups, families that do train undergraduates are not involved in research. Most Indian students and tourists, and visitors are encouraged to get engaged with and participate in therefore do not go through the process interactive science activities. of being nurtured from an early stage by academics who are actively engaged in research, as the best Indian researchers Comments from physicsworld.com are isolated from the countrys mainstream education system. Now hear this: the way people perceive and I think a complex set of reasons are analyse sounds is highly nonlinear. We know responsible for this situation. One key this because there is a restriction (called the concern is that conducting research has Gabor limit) on the accuracy of linear methods been more of an exception than a norm in simultaneously determining a sounds pitch in most Indian universities. In recent and timing and humans routinely beat it. years, many initiatives have been set up Our report on a new study of this phenomenon to address this problem and a flood of (Human hearing is highly nonlinear, money is now available to people who 31January) had physicsworld.com readers are interested in pursuing research speculating about how hearing works, and projects. The problem is that most Indian what further tests might reveal. academics have not looked at research for the better part of their careers, so Maybe humans beat the Gabor limit because whatever research they pursue is likely to theyre using more than one process one that be ad hoc and not original. does timing well but is bad at frequency analysis This scenario has to change if India is and another that does frequency analysis well to do better. Undergraduate education but is bad at timing. I think its possible to devise should be introduced in all of the centres more tests to confirm this. that are currently dedicated only to philius, Ireland research. It is not just the undergraduates who stand to benefit from this; professors You cannot get the answer simply by using two will benefit just as much when they are processes. They must be correlated. Imagine teaching curious young students. using this dual analysis: Prem Prasad 1. We analysed the frequency and we know there Manipal, Karnataka, India were three pitches, A, C# and G. But we cannot premmirthinti@gmail.com say when they occurred. 2. We analysed the timings and we know the I found the special report on India pitches changed at 1.4 seconds and 1.8 seconds well planned and highly informative, from the start of the first one. But we cannot say especially the article on Igniting
P hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
In addition to permanent exhibition galleries and science parks, the NCSM regularly organizes travelling exhibitions on contemporary scientific issues. One of its most remarkable activities is a specially designed museo-bus that brings exhibitions on scientific topics relevant to the rural population to remote villages. The NCSM has also taken on the responsibility of building science communication skills among teachers in schools, colleges and universities, and the professional development of science teachers is one of several areas identified as a target for future activities. These initiatives along with many others I have no room to mention here will help to develop a passion for physics not only among Indias top students, but also members of the wider public.
Kanchan Chowdhury National Council of Science Museums, India kkc_154@yahoo.co.in
what the order of the pitches was. So you see, it is a 2D problem, but the approach you suggest applies two 1D analysis techniques.
edprochak
We already know the ear is highly nonlinear in its amplitude response. Why would we expect it to be linear in any other way? Anyone who has ever played with resonant circuits understands that as you raise the Q of the circuit to get better frequency selection, the response time (hence the time to detection at a certain amplitude) increases. The two are directly related. But that applies only to a single resonator. As I understand it, the ear has (very) many resonators, the cochlear hairs, to pick up each individual frequency. It would not surprise me to find also many resonators at the same frequency but with different Q, allowing the ear also to pick up timing differences at reasonable amplitudes. Both sets of detector would work to give the effects seen.
ajansen
19
NCSM
Feedback
I read Physics Worlds report on India with a keen interest, but I wish it had mentioned the work of the Institute of Mathematical Sciences in Chennai (IMSc), where I earned my PhD. This is partly because the IMSc has just celebrated its golden jubilee: it was officially inaugurated in 1962, after outgrowing its origins as a series of theoretical physics seminars that met in the family home of founding director Alladi Ramakrishnan. More importantly, though, the IMSc unlike other institutions of specialized research is seriously concerned with the spread of basic education in its neighbourhood. The reason is a deep-rooted belief that the future of scientific research depends on quality education at all levels all over the country. The IMScs interest in local education shows up in the way its faculty enthusiastically engages with the education of college and university teachers by delivering more than 100 lectures each year and also organizing many workshops and courses both within and outside its campus. Its schemes for associate and visiting scholars are very similar to the ones at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, in Trieste, Italy, though they operate at a regional level. Faculty members write more than 50 articles each year on popular science and mathematics. Such a vibrant outreach programme is an essential way of serving the Indian physics community.
signatures from strangers at a conference than it did about how best to develop professional relationships. I know a lot of people in my field, related fields and the wider science community. Sameen Ahmed Khan Ive met some at conferences, and it does Salalah College of Technology, Oman help if you remember their names and rohelakhan@yahoo.com register what you have in common, as Kuchner suggests. However, contrary to Editors note Kuchners view that online social networks We had to be selective about what are only good for superficial interactions, our special report included, and we I have found Twitter immensely helpful in acknowledge that it focused more on building and nurturing connections that the success stories in Indias physics extend beyond people I have met face-tocommunity than the problems not least face. If I need help with a project of mutual because the peaks are easier to spot and interest, I can ask my Twitter contacts and describe. Physics World will, however, be continuing to cover physics in India both will often get a response, even from people Ive never met, or from people who are positives and negatives in the future. For those who missed it, the report can be connected to someone Im connected to. For example, I am the current director read at http://ow.ly/foCk7. of the ScienceGrrl network (www. sciencegrrl.co.uk), which promotes science to girls and young women and supports those already working the field. ScienceGrrl began on Twitter and is largely sustained by it, and it was some time before I met my fellow ScienceGrrls Marc Kuchners article on the importance in person, since we are dotted around the UK. Traditional friendship, based to ones career of making friends, rather on personal contact and shared personal than merely networking (February pp4445) said more about a rather strange history, is not a prerequisite of initiating effective collaborative working. form of networking based on collecting People organize their online social networks in different ways. Ive found that Facebook works best for personal contacts and conversations (my Facebook friends are all people Ive met and liked), while Twitter works well for professional contacts, as people follow you largely because you Tweet on a particular subject. I divide what I broadcast to each network accordingly, but I am not impersonal, dispassionate or apolitical on Twitter I would make for very dull reading if that were the case and have made some really good friends through it. Ive met most of them in person, but not all. In summary, I dont see the friendships vs networks dichotomy that Kuchner observes. Like most people of my generation, who have changed jobs Introducing the Model 22C several times and are connected to wider networks via social media, I just have Two-channel Cryogenic Temperature Controller people I know. I know some of these people better than others, some well Two multipurpose input channels support most cryogenic enough to spend time with in person, some well enough to confide in, and a temperature sensors. Thermocouple inputs are optional. select few to whom I can truly bare my Operates from <200mK to over 1500K. soul. Theres a spectrum of friendship, Four control loops: 50-Watt, 25-Watt and two 10V. populated by a diverse congregation of fabulous people who connect with me for Large, bright and user configurable display. different reasons and on a range of levels. Two 10-Ampere dry-contact relay outputs. Id rather savour the rainbow of variety than segregate them into friends (=useful) Ethernet, IEEE-488.2 (GBIP) and USB remote interfaces. and network (=not useful).
20
Visit: www.lesker.com/Builder
Design & Build Your Custom Chamber Quote, Price & Order Online Download Your 3D Drawings
13-031
Uniquely Versatile
PIEZOCERAMIC NANOPOSITIONING SYSTEMS
Piezo-Tip/Tilt Mirrors
Deflection angle to 6 Two tilt axes and one linear axis >1 kHz resonant frequency
World Leader in
Applications:
Quantum cryptography research Implementation of novel protocols Education and training Demonstrations and technology evaluation
Whether it is optical metrology, precision machining or adaptive optics the compact piezoceramic systems from PI are, thanks to their unique dynamics, precision and reliability, the ideal solution for beam steering and stabilization as well as the alignment of optical components. For more information, write to info@pi.ws www.pi.ws Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 721 4846-0
Photon Counters
VIS wavelength
and
NIR Wavelength
and in
Si APD
PIEZO
NANO
POSITIONING
pi_130062_kombi6_91x262_en.indd 1
17.01.13 09:31
Comment
Physics World Temple Circus, Temple Way, Bristol BS1 6HG, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 929 7481 E-mail: pwld@iop.org Web: physicsworld.com Twitter: @PhysicsWorld Facebook: facebook.com/physicsworld Editor Matin Durrani Associate Editor Dens Milne News Editor Michael Banks Reviews and Careers Editor Margaret Harris Features Editor Louise Mayor Production Editor Kate Gardner Web Editor Hamish Johnston Multimedia Projects Editor James Dacey Web Reporter Tushna Commissariat Managing Editor Susan Curtis Marketing and Circulation Gemma Bailey Advertisement Sales Chris Thomas Advertisement Production Mark Trimnell Diagram Artist Alison Tovey Art Director Andrew Giaquinto Subscription information 2013 volume The subscription rate for institutions is 340 per annum for the magazine, 645 per annum for the archive. Single issues are 32. Orders to: IOP Circulation Centre, CDS Global, Tower House, Lathkill Street, Sovereign Park, Market Harborough, Leicestershire LE16 9EF, UK (tel: +44 (0)845 4561511; fax: +44 (0)1858 438428; e-mail: iop@subscription.co.uk). Physics World is available on an individual basis, worldwide, through membership of the Institute of Physics Copyright 2013 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors. All rights reserved. IOP Publishing Ltd permits single photocopying of single articles for private study or research, irrespective of where the copying is done. Multiple copying of contents or parts thereof without permission is in breach of copyright, except in the UK under the terms of the agreement between the CVCP and the CLA. Authorization of photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by IOP Publishing Ltd for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of $2.50 per copy is paid directly to CCC, 27 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970, USA Bibliographic codes ISSN: 0953-8585 CODEN: PHWOEW Printed in the UK by Warners (Midlands) plc, The Maltings, West Street, Bourne, Lincolnshire PE10 9PH
John Richardson; The Comic Stripper
Quantum frontiers
Welcome to this special issue of Physics World on ideas at the edge of quantum physics Quantum mechanics, it is safe to say, is one of the most successful theories in physics. It offers explanations for everything from the behaviour of semiconductors and transistors to lasers and solar cells and can even account for how and why stars shine. Yet many of the questions raised by quantum mechanics about the subatomic world and of reality itself can be mind-blowing. Whats more, the quantum world keeps throwing up new surprises and shows no signs of having been fully explored. This special issue of Physics World shines a light on some of the most interesting cutting-edge work at the frontiers of quantum physics. Vlatko Vedral from the University of Oxford kicks things off (pp3032) by giving you a quick-fire reminder of the key points in quantum physics and a brief summary of the main articles in this issue. These look at the fascinating new paradigm of weak measurement (pp3540), the application of quantum physics to biology (pp4245), the use of cold atoms to simulate the quantum world (pp4751) and the use of entanglement for completely secure satellite communication (pp5256). Two other articles examine the impact of quantum physics on popular culture (pp2527) and among the physics community itself (p29). There is much, though, we have missed out for reasons of space, not least quantum computing. It is a topic we have covered before, notably in our last special issue on quantum physics exactly 15years ago this month. It was graced with one of our most famous cover images (above left), showing Alice and Bob (the names given by convention to those sending and receiving quantum signals) in the style of pop artist Roy Lichtenstein. This months specially commissioned cover (above right) echoes our earlier image while underlining that the mysteries of the quantum world show no sign of abating. If youre a member of the Institute of Physics, do check out our special quantum-related video and audio content in the digital version of Physics World via our apps or at members.iop.org.
physics
The Institute of Physics 76 Portland Place, London W1B 1NT, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7470 4800 Fax: +44 (0)20 7470 4848 E-mail: physics@iop.org Web: www.iop.org The contents of this magazine, including the views expressed above, are the responsibility of the Editor. They do not r epresent the views or policies of the Institute of Physics, except where explicitly stated.
Physics World is an award-winning magazine and website SIPAwards 2012: Best Use of Social Media MemCom Awards 2012: Best Magazine Professional Association or Royal College
P hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
Were busy right now dreaming up a selection of A-list speakers for a special Physics World strand in November at the Bristol Festival of Ideas (www.ideasfestival.co.uk). Meanwhile, planning is under way for our special anniversary issue in October, where well be revealing our pick of the 25 key people, discoveries, images, applications and questions in physics now and over the last 25 years. 23
ld wor
Every image is a work of art! The innovative pco.edge with outstanding sCMOS technology sets new standards for scientific camera systems! It combines an exceptional dynamic range (1 : 27 000, digitized in 16 bit), maximum frame rate (100 images/s), and high resolution (2560 2160 pixel) with extremely low readout noise (1.1med e-) into one versatile overall result for demanding applications.
DETECTOR WARRANTY*
T450sc-Series_193x125.indd 1
2/13/13 1:44 PM
Abstract reality Eric J Heller is a Harvard University physicist and chemist who takes computer simulations of quantum processes and turns them into works of art, such as this piece based on a quantum chaos map.
The Earth and the heavens, according to Newtonian mechanics, were not separate places made of different stuff but part of a uni-verse in which space and time and the laws that govern them are single, uniform and the same across all scales. This universe is also homogeneous. It is not ruled by ghosts or phantoms that pop up and disappear unpredictably. Everything has a distinct identity and is located at a specific place at a specific time. The Newtonian world is like a cosmic stage or billiard table, where things change only when pushed by
P hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
forces. All space is alike and continuous, all directions comparable, all events caused. This picture strongly influenced philosophers, theologians, writers, artists and even political thinkers. Indeed, the philosopher Richard Rorty once referred to Newtonian political scientist[s], who centre social reforms around what human beings are like not knowledge of what Greeks or Frenchmen or Chinese are like, but of humanity as such. Meanwhile, in 20032004, the New York Public Library staged an exhibition entitled The Newtonian Moment to showcase Newtons cultural impact and illustrate the revolution in worldview his work brought about. Writing in the exhibitions catalogue, the historian of science Mordechai Feingold declared that the name was chosen because the Enlightenment and Revolution comprised the epoch and the manner in which Newtonian thought came to permeate European culture in all its forms. Feingold was using the word moment in the way historians do, referring to special turning points in which a radically new idea recasts past conflicts and tensions to open up new possibilities for the future. These
turning points are cultural paradigm shifts that change what human beings know and do, and how they interpret their experiences. Features of the Newtonian Moment include the assumption of universal continuity, certainty, predictability, sameness across scales, and the ability of scientists to take themselves out of measurements to see nature as it is apart from humanexistence.
The Newtonian Moment lasted for some 250 years until the start of the 20th century, when it was ambushed by the quantum. Many scientists initially hoped that they could find a comfortable place for the quantum on the Newtonian stage, but by 1927 it had become clear that the quantum undermined many features of the Newtonian world, raising unprecedented philosophical as well as scientific issues. Never in the history of science, wrote the science historian Max Jammer, has there been a theory which has had such a profound impact on human thinking as quantum mechanics. Some scientists tried to explain what was happening by spreading word of quantum physics into ever-widening social spheres
25
Popular physics A couple walks past Quantum Field-X3, an installation by Japanese artist Hiro Yamagata, outside the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain.
in Dallas, Texas on 22 November 1963, in the few momentous seconds when President John F Kennedys motorcade drove through and he was hit by an assassins bullets. The more closely and carefully the frames were examined, Updike noted, the less sense the things in them made. Who was the umbrella man sporting an open umbrella despite it being a sunny day? Who was the tan-coated man who first runs away, then is seen in a gray Rambler driven by a Negro? What about the blurry figure in the window next to the one from which the shots were fired? Were these innocent A new humanism In 1967 the critic and novelist John Updike bystanders or part of a conspiracy? We wonder, Updike wrote, whether wrote a brief reflection on the photographs and amateur films taken in Dealey Plaza a genuine mystery is being concealed here
P hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
Such remarks suggest that humanists embraced quantum mechanics because they experienced the Newtonian universe as a cold and constricting place in which they felt defensive and marginalized with the news of the strangeness of the quantum domain coming almost as a relief. But if this is the only reason humanists found developments of the quantum world liberating, it was surely their own doing, for they were relying far too seriously on science to begin with in understanding their own experience.
26
Digital Has the cultural impact of quantum Multichannel Analyzer mechanics been simply to supply us with a storehouse of unusual, vivid and sometimes pretentious or even loopy images?
or whether any similar scrutiny of a minute section of time and space would yield similar strangenesses gaps, inconsistencies, warps and bubbles in the surface of circumstance. Perhaps, as with the elements of matter, investigation passes a threshold of common sense and enters a subatomic realm where laws are mocked, where persons have the life-span of beta particles and the transparency of neutrinos, and where a rough kind of averaging out must substitute for absolute truth. Years later, many frames turned out to have rational explanations. The umbrella man was identified to the satisfaction of all but diehard conspiracy theorists. Testifying before a Congressional committee, the man in question said he had been simply protesting against the Kennedy familys dealings with Hitlers Germany, with the black umbrella Neville Chamberlains trademark fashion accessory being a symbol for Nazi appeasers. Far from heralding a breach in the rationality of the world, the umbrella man was just a heckler. Barrett, being a philosopher, had proposed that the cultural effect of quantum mechanics was to strip us of illusions. Updike, a novelist with a keen interest in science who followed contemporary developments in physics with care, reached a different conclusion. His words above indicate that he saw the impact of quantum mechanics on culture to be deeper and more positive than Barrett had. Indeed, Updike often has his fictional characters refer to physics terms in a metaphorical way that allows them to voice their experiences morearticulately. The novelist was fully aware that when scientists look at the subatomic world frame by frame, so to speak, what they find is discontinuous and strange its happenings random except when collectively considered. Updike also knew that most of us tend to find our lives following a similar crazy logic. Our world does not always feel smooth, continuous, reliable, lawgoverned, stable and substantive; close up, its palpable sensuousness is often jittery, discontinuous, chaotic, irrational, unstable and ephemeral. Reality today does not seem to have the gentle, universal continuities of the Newtonian world, but is more like that of the surface of a boiling pot of water. Using quantum language to describe everyday conditions may therefore be techP hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
nically incorrect but is metaphorically apt. In another essay, Updike wrote that our centurys revelations of unthinkable largeness and unimaginable smallness, of abysmal stretches of geological time when we were nothing, of supernumerary galaxies and indeterminate subatomic behaviour, of a kind of mad mathematical violence at the heart of matter have scorched us deeper than we know. The scorching brought about by such scientific discoveries, Updike proposed, had given birth to a new humanism whose feeble, hopeless voice is provided by the minimal monologuists of the Irish playwright Samuel Beckett and which is also evident in the instantly recognizable wire-thin, eroded figures of the Swiss sculptor Alberto Giacometti.
The MCA8000D is a full-featured digital multichannel analyzer intended to be used with a wide variety of detector systems. The easy to use 'Pocket MCA' can fit in a shirt pocket. Features oF the MCa8000D
Compatible with traditional analog pulse shaping MCA and MCS modes High speed ADC (100 MHz, 16 bit) with digital pulse height measurement 8k data channels Minimum pulse peaking time 500 ns Conversion time 10 ns Sliding-scale linearization Differential nonlinearity <0.6% Integral nonlinearity <0.02% Two peak detection modes for nuclear spectroscopy or particle counter calibration in clean rooms. Two TTL compatible gates for coincidence and anticoincidence USB, RS-232, and Ethernet communication interfaces USB powered Dimensions: 125 x 71 x 20 mm Weight: <165 g Free Display and Acquisition software Free Software Development Kit (SDK). Complete protocol and example code for custom software applications.
If only all human voices were as articulate as Beckett and Giacometti! Too frequently, the use of quantum language and concepts in popular culture amounts to what the physicist John Polkinghorne calls quantum hype, or the invocation of quantum mechanics as sufficient licence for lazy indulgence in playing with paradox in other disciplines. This is how it principally appears in things like TV programmes, cartoons, T-shirts and coffee cups. Updikes remarks, however, suggest that quantum mechanics a theory of awesome comprehensiveness that has yet to make an unconfirmed prediction has does more than help to deepen our knowledge of the world and to expand our ability to manipulate it. The novelists remarks suggest that quantum mechanics though a modification, not a replacement, of Newtonian mechanics has provided us with a range of novel and helpful images to interpret our experiences of the world in a new way, on a scale equal to or possibly even greater than Newtonian mechanics. Quantum physics is metaphorically appealing because it reflects the difficulty we face in describing our own experiences; quantum mechanics is strange and so are we. Someday, indeed, the era after the Newtonian Moment may come to be known as the Quantum Moment.
Robert PCrease is a professor in the Department of Philosophy, Stony Brook University, and historian at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, US, e-mail rcrease@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
AMPTEK Inc.
www.amptek.com
27
sales@amptek.com
2014
2125 July icsos11: 11th international conference on the structure of surfaces University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Organised by the IOP Thin Films and Surfaces Group
2015
1216 april electrostatics 2015 Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK Organised by the IOP Electrostatics Group See www.iop.org/conferences for a full list of IOP one-day meetings. The conferences department provides a professional event-management service to the IOPs subject groups and supports bids to bring international physics events to the UK. Institute of Physics, 76 Portland Place, London W1B 1NT, UK Tel +44 (0)20 7470 4800 E-mail conferences@iop.org Web www.iop.org/conferences
Comment: Forum
Agreeing to disagree
A recent poll has highlighted physicists differing views over the interpretation of fundamental aspects of quantum theory, but Maximilian Schlosshauer argues that it might not be so bad
If all this damned quantum jumping were really to stay, Erwin Schrdinger complained to his colleague Niels Bohr in 1926, I should be sorry I ever got involved with quantum theory. Schrdinger, like Bohr, was a founding father of quantum theory, which had just turned our view of the world upside down. But he was not alone in his discomfort. Albert Einstein, too, spent years arguing with Bohr over whether atomic events are fundamentally random or if quantum theory really is all we can say about physical reality. Indeed, he once wrote that the theory reminded him of the system of delusions of an exceedingly intelligent paranoiac. Today quantum theory underlies all modern technology: from transistors, light-emitting diodes and photovoltaics, to nuclear power, magnetic-resonance imaging, lasers and atomic clocks. It is a seemingly inexhaustible source of new ideas and applications. Quantum-information science, for example, is a fresh take on information processing, and promises computers faster than anything we could currently imagine. No-one, of course, would dispute the immense successes of quantum theory. But looking at the heart of quantum theory itself, are we any closer to agreeing what it is trying to tell us about nature? Or has nothing really changed since the 1920s? not tell us when it will actually decay the individual event, when it happens, seems to come out of nowhere. Einstein could not accept the idea of a universe in which events truly randomly fall out one way or the other, famously declaring that God doesnt play dice. But Einsteins reservations didnt seem to faze our respondents. A two-thirds majority declared Einsteins view wrong and randomness a fundamental concept in nature, and half thought that the randomness we see in quantum phenomena is indeed fundamental and irreducible: that there is no hidden hand no gambling God governing these events.
iStockphoto/pixhook
Multiple choices
Traunkirchen in Austria is a picture-postcard village. Sitting by a pristine lake and surrounded by the snow-capped peaks of the Alps, it was the perfect setting for a conference in July 2011 on quantum physics and the nature of reality. Together with Johannes Kofler from the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics and Anton Zeilinger from the University of Vienna, I polled nearly three dozen leading physicists, philosophers and mathematicians about their views on quantum theory. The questionnaires consisted of 16 multiple-choice questions that probed the whole spectrum of fundamental questions about quantum theory. Knowing how
P hy sic s Wor ld Mar ch 2013
So what can we learn from our poll? One thing is clear: quantum physics has moved from philosophical debates to concrete action. Quantum-information science, hailed by an overwhelming majority as a breath of fresh air, is being put to use in looking at old problems from a new angle. It has helped us not only to get a better understanding of what we can do with quantum theory, but also to find new ways of understanding the theory itself. Various new interpretations based around quantum information have popped up in the last decade, and our poll shows them rivalling the traditional interpretations. And instead of just slapping an interpretation on a readymade theory, people now try to actually derive quantum theory from simple, physical principles a new take on the theory that a majority in our poll found useful. Nearly 90 years after Schrdingers exasperated cry about this damned quantum jumping, the jumping goes on and it has got us to an awful lot of new places. In fact, two-thirds of our respondents see no limit for quantum theorys reach. They think it should be possible, in principle at least, to put not only single atoms into quantum superpositions, but also everyday objects such as a football, or even living organisms. Indeed, this is the kind of situation Schrdinger had ridiculed in his famous paradox, in which quantum theory forces a cat into an otherworldly state of dead and alive. What Schrdinger had intended as a reductio ad absurdum has today become just another challenge to experimentalists.
Maximilian Schlosshauer is a quantum theorist at the University of Portland in Oregon. He edited Elegance and Enigma a collection of interviews with quantum physicists, e-mail schlossh@up.edu
29
In 1900 Lord Kelvin famously pronounced that there is nothing new to be discovered in physics. All that remains is more and more precise measure ment. The timing of this prediction was spectacu larly bad. On 14December of the same year Max Planck published a paper introducing the concept of quanta, thereby starting a new revolution in physics that would lead us to a completely different under standing of the world. Over the following three decades quantum physics was fully developed, and applied to explain a wide range of phenomena. It now accounts for the basic properties of small objects such as atoms and sub atomic particles, as well as the world of intermediate objects such as solids, describing, for example, their conductivity and superconductivity. Quantum phys ics equally applies to astronomically large objects, such as stars, explaining why and how they shine, as well as correctly predicting the size of white dwarfs. Even spiders use quantum physics when crawling up vertical walls without succumbing to gravity. But despite the success of quantum physics, there is one thing it does not explain: gravity the only fundamental force that is still impervious to quanti zation. Some people think that this means gravity is not a fundamental force after all, but a consequence of something else (and hence we might not need to quantize it). Others, most notably the University of Oxford physicist Roger Penrose, maintain that quan tum physics will ultimately crush under the weight of gravity. Quantum physics departs from classical physics in two key aspects. First, it acknowledges that the most fundamental events in the microscopic world are genuinely random, i.e. that there is no algorithm for predicting when an atom will emit a photon or when an incoming photon will reflect from your sun glasses. Albert Einstein, who was a determinist, com plained a great deal about randomness in quantum physics, most memorably in discussions with Niels Bohr, using the now-famous catchphrase God does not play dice. The second big departure in quantum physics is the existence of correlations how meas
urements on one system give results related to meas urements on another which are independent of space and time, and connect objects into a network of interdependent entities. Erwin Schrdinger called these correlations quantum entanglement, while Einstein complained about this aspect of quantum physics even more than about randomness, dismiss ing entanglement as spooky action at a distance. Both properties of quantum physics that Ein stein disliked have, however, since been confirmed in numerous experiments. Quantum randomness is now being used in cryptography to improve the secrecy of communications and quantum entangle ment provides the basis for many of the fast-develop ing quantum technologies. Indeed, last years Nobel Prize for Physics went to David Wineland and Serge Haroche for making the first steps in this direction. Behind both the randomness and the spooky action is the notion of quantum superposition, namely the fact that quantum systems can exist in many differ ent states at the same time. However, we still do not really understand in which situations the superposi tion principle is valid, nor do we really understand what it would mean for a macroscopic object to be in two or more different states at the same time. For a theory as successful as quantum physics, it is indeed curious that we are still arguing about its meaning. It seems that the macroscopic world we live in is largely governed by classical physics and it is very different from the world that quantum objects occupy. But, of course, it must be possible to derive the classical world from the quantum world. After all, large objects are collections of many atoms, each of which behaves fully quantum mechanically. The connection between quantum and classical physics is provided through the notion of a quan tum measurement. Properties of quantum systems, such as their positions and momenta, are generally indeterminate until we make a measurement. It is only by measuring, say, the position of an atom that we imprint a definitive location on it. However, this measurement at the same time makes the atoms velocity uncertain. Quantum measurements are like
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
30
footsteps on a dusty road the firmer they are in establishing footprints, the more dust they raise, and this cloud of dust prevents us from seeing the foot prints clearly in the future.
Curiouser and curiouser To understand the unintuitive nature of quantum measurement we must first understand what kind of a process a measurement is. According to the stan dard dogma of quantum physics, quantum systems evolve differently when measured from how they evolve when they are free, i.e. when they are left alone. Observation, in other words, affects quantum behaviour (unlike in classical physics where measur ing a cars speed does not change how fast the vehi cle is going). However, between the free evolution
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
and the full measurement there is a continuum of possibilities, known by the name of weak measure ments. When these were introduced in 1988 by Yakir Aharonov and colleagues, they caused a great deal of excitement. Weak measurements obtain information about the system (albeit only partial), but they do not change the state much (hence the name weak). This leads to the possibility of undoing the quantum measurement, at least with a high probability. Uncollapsing the collapse sounds like a contradiction in terms, but the key issue is that the measurement is only weak. Other quantum paradoxes can be viewed through weak measurements, as Aephraim Stein berg and colleagues explain elsewhere in this issue (pp3540). Even without fully understanding the picture of the
31
Beam me up Entangled photons can be used for quantum teleportation, quantum computing and possibly even secure satellite communications.
world according to quantum physics, we can still use quantum systems to develop new technologies. One of the key advantages of quantum systems is their universality in other words, every quantum system of sufficient complexity should be able to simulate efficiently every other quantum system. One of the most developed quantum simulators at present uses atoms cooled down to near absolute zero. The inter actions between these cold atoms can be tuned so well in the laboratory that they can be made to inter act in many different ways, allowing them to simulate the behaviour of other systems. This is useful first and foremost because some physical systems, such as high-temperature superconductors, are so com plicated that it is difficult to determine their exact quantum description by measuring them directly. Simulating their behaviour with atoms lets us extract over, we can what we believe to be the essence. More also simulate the behaviour of systems we are not even sure exist in nature. For example, Majorana fermions are meant to be fermionic particles (like electrons), but at the same time they are their own antiparticles (unlike elec trons). At present only bosons, such as photons, are known to also be their own antiparticles so we do not really know if Majorana fermions exist. Interest ingly, this does not prevent us from simulating them with cold atoms. But is our ability to simulate things that nature does not create itself a deep and funda mental property of the universe? Or is natures way of making Majorana fermions first to make humans who then figure out how to artificially make (i.e. simulate) Majorana fermions? To paraphrase Bohr, a physicist is just a Majorana fermions way of creat ing itself. Immanuel Bloch explores this fascinating topic for us on pages 4750.
communication between quantum computers based on Earth and on satellites. The current world record in distant quantum-information processing is held by Anton Zeilinger and colleagues, who teleported a quantum bit across a distance of 143km between the Canary Islands of La Palma and Tenerife. This terrestrial record will be smashed once we move into space the fact that there are very few atoms around eliminates a great deal of the noise we have to face when doing experiments on Earth. Performing quantum experiments in space will also allow us to test fundamental physics theories in regimes we have never before been able to access. That is because it will let us send signals over large distances, between platforms moving at large relative speeds, all in near-vacuum conditions. Indeed, cer tain tests of alternative theories to quantum physics, such as Penroses gravitationally induced collapse, are only realistically possible in space. The problem is the measurements required are very sensitive since the effects postulated at the boundary of quantum physics and gravity are rather meagre and any other potential noise needs to be eliminated. For more on this fascinating topic of space-based quantum phys ics, check out the article by Brendon Higgins and Thomas Jennewein (pp5256). Quantum physics is also proving useful in our understanding of biology, which has traditionally been based on classical physics given that biologi cal mole cules are so large, warm and wet. After all, systems that interact strongly with their envi ronment (and so are warm and wet) cannot behave coherently because the environment itself impedes quantum coherence. Moreover, large molecules have many more ways in which quantum coherence can be destroyed. However, we are now discover ing that biology may use some of the more sophis ticated quantum tricks to improve its processing. One interesting case, which Jim Al-Khalili explains, is the possibility that DNA mutations are the result of the quantum tunnelling of hydrogen (pp4245). Other fascinating examples are bacteria implement ing a quantum random walk to optimize photosyn thesis, birds using entangled electrons to determine the inclination of the Earths magnetic field and the amazing possibility that we humans and other ani mals can smell quantumsuperpositions.
Beyond the physics lab Quantum physics may often sound like science fic tion, but surely Bohr, Einstein or any of its founders would never have believed that it might one day be possible to do quantum experiments in space. The main motive for taking quantum experiments to this new frontier is that if our future communication tech nology is to be fully quantum, it will involve quantum 32
Anybodys guess So what of the future? I predict that in 2013 we will see the first implementation of quantum telepor tation between satellites. We will also see the first cold-atom simulation of non-Abelian anyons (parti cles with a behaviour that lies somewhere between fermions and bosons). We will have more evidence that biological energy transport is fundamentally quantum mechanical. We will almost certainly still puzzle over the meaning of quantum measurement. And finally, I am convinced that another Nobel prize will be given for testing quantum-mechanical effects, most likely the existence of the Higgs boson. My predictions will almost certainly be wrong, but even if they are, quantum physics is guaranteed to keep us tantalized for many years to come. n
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
BICOM_11618.02
3.10.2012
Intuitive operation via the iPad touch panel which is installed either on the leak detector or allows for mobile operation.
www.myunivex.com The PHOENIX L500i opens up new dimensions of productivity and reliability
Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum GmbH Bonner Strasse 498 D-50968 Kln T +49 (0)221 347-0 F +49 (0)221 347-1250 E-mail : info.vacuum@oerlikon.com http://www.oerlikon.com/leyboldvacuum
JORAN Hexapod
HEXAPOD ADVANTAGES
6 degrees of freedom payload capacity: 1 500 kg resolution: 0.1 m / 0.5 rad high stability & sti ness con guration of the rotation centre in software
1,500C in 1 min.
Infrared Heater for your sample in vacuum
Instruments
Vacuum
japan
Products of
ADIT Electron Tubes, 300 Crane Street, Sweetwater, Texas 79556, USA Phone: (325) 235 1418 Fax: (325) 235 2872 sales@electrontubes.com www.electrontubes.com
In praise of weakness
Quantum physics is being transformed by a radical new conceptual and experimental approach known as weak measurement that can do everything from tackling basic quantum mysteries to mapping the trajectories of photons in a Youngs double-slit experiment. Aephraim Steinberg, AmirFeizpour, Lee Rozema, Dylan Mahler and Alex Hayat unveil the power of this new technique
There is no quantum world, claimed Niels Bohr, one of the founders of quantum mechanics. This powerful theory, though it underlies so much of modern science and technology, is an abstract mathematical description that is notoriously difficult to visualize so much so that Bohr himself felt it a mistake to even try. Of course, there are rules that let us extract from the mathematics some predictions about what will happen when we make observations or measurements. To Bohr, the only real task of physics was to make these predictions, and the hope of actually elucidating what is really there when no-one is looking was nonsense. We know how to predict what you will see if you look, but if you do not look, it means nothing to ask What would have happened if I had?. The German theorist Pascual Jordan went further.
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Observations, he once wrote, not only disturb what is to be measured, they produce it. What Jordan meant is that the wavefunction does not describe reality, but only makes statistical predictions about potential measurements. As far as the wavefunction is concerned, Schrdingers cat is indeed alive and dead. Only when we choose what to measure must the wavefunction collapse into one state or another, to use the language of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory. Over the last 20 years, however, a new set of ideas about quantum measurement has little by little been gaining a foothold in the minds of some physicists. Known as weak measurement, this novel paradigm has already been used for investigating a number of basic mysteries of quantum mechanics. At a more
Aephraim Steinberg , AmirFeizpour, LeeRozema, DylanMahler and Alex Hayat are at the Centre for Quantum Information and Quantum Control and the Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada, e-mail steinberg@ physics.utoronto.ca
35
Point and tell Making a measurement with a classical device is simple: where the needle points provides information about the current flowing through it. The concept of measurement in quantum physics is a much more complexaffair.
practical level, it has also been used to develop new methods for carrying out real-world measurements with remarkable sensitivity. Perhaps most significantly in the long run, some researchers believe that weak measurements may offer a glimmer of hope for a deeper understanding of whatever it is that lies behind the quantum state.
Quantum measurement theory Before quantum mechanics was established, no-one seemed to feel the need for a distinct theory of measurement. A measuring device was simply a physical system like any other, and was described according to the same physical laws. When, for example, Hans Christian rsted discovered that current flowing in a wire caused a compass needle to move, it was natural to use this fact to build galvanometers, in which the deflection of the needle gives us some information about the current. By calibrating the device and using our knowledge of electromagnetism, we can simply deduce the size of the current from the position of the needle. There is no concept of an ideal measurement every measurement has uncertainty, and may be influenced by extraneous factors. But as long as the current has had some effect on the needle then, if we are careful, we can look at the needle and extract some information about the current. Quantum theory, however, raises some very thorny questions, such as What exactly is a measurement? and When does collapse occur?. Indeed, quantum mechanics has specific axioms for how to deal with measurement, which have spawned an entire field known as quantum-measurement theory. This has, however, created a rather regrettable situation in which most people trained today in quantum mechanics think of measurement as being defined by certain mathematical rules about projection operators and eigenvalues, with the things experimentalists call measurements being nothing more than poor cousins to this lofty theory. But physics is an experimental science. It is not the role of experiment to try to come as close as possible to some idealized theory; it is the role of theory to try to describe (with idealizations when necessary) what happens in the real world. Such a theory was in fact worked out in 1932 by the Hungarian theorist John von Neumann, who
conceived of a measurement as involving some interaction between two physical objects the system and the meter. When they interact, some property of the meter say, the deflection of a galvanometer needle will change by an amount proportional to some observable of the system, which would, in this case, be the current flowing through the wire. Von Neumanns innovation was to treat both the system and the meter fully quantum-mechanically, rather than assuming one is classical and the other quantum. (Strange as it may seem, it is perfectly possible to describe a macroscopic object such as a galvanometer needle in terms of quantum mechanics you can, for instance, write down a wavepacket describing its centre of mass.) Once this step is taken, the same theory that describes the free evolution of the system can also be used to calculate its effect on the meter and we have no need to worry about where to place some magical quantumclassical borderline. This leads to a wrinkle, however. If the meter itself is quantum-mechanical, then it obeys the uncertainty principle, and it is not possible to talk about exactly where its needle is pointing. And if the needle does not point at one particular mark on the dial if it is rather spread out in some broad wavepacket then how can we hope to read off the current? Von Neumann imagined that in a practical setting, any measuring device would be macroscopic enough that this quantum uncertainty could be arranged to be negligible. In other words, he proposed that a well-designed observation would make use of a needle that, although described by a wave packet with quantum uncertainty, had a very small uncertainty in position. Provided that this uncertainty in the pointer position was much smaller than the deflection generated through the measurement interaction, that deflection could be established reasonably accurately thus providing us with a good idea of the value of the quantity we wished to measure. But the small uncertainty in the position of the needle automatically means that it must have a very large momentum uncertainty. And working through the equations, one finds that this momentum uncertainty leads to what is often referred to as an uncontrollable, irreversible disturbance, which is taken by the Copenhagen interpretation to be an indispens able by-product of measurement. In other words, we can learn a lot about one observable of a system but only at the cost of perturbing another. This measurement disturbance is what makes it impossible to reconstruct the full history of a quantum particle why, for example, we cannot plot the trajectory of a photon in a Youngs double-slit experiment as it passes from the slit to the screen. (Actually, as explained in the box on p40, it turns out that weak measurement provides a way of plotting something much like a trajectory.)
Enter weak measurement The idea of weak measurement was first proposed by Yakir Aharonov and co-workers in two key papers in 1988 and 1990 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351 and Phys. Rev. A 41 11). Their idea was to modify VonNeumanns prescription in one very simple but profound
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
36
Strength in weakness Obtained through the principle of weak measurement, this 3D plot shows where a quantum particle is most likely to be found as it passes through a Youngs double-slit apparatus and exhibits wave-like behaviour. The lines overlaid on top of the 3D surface are the experimentally reconstructed average paths that the particles take through the experiment.
way. If we deliberately allow the uncertainty in the initial pointer position (and hence the uncertainty in the measurement) to be large, then although no individual measurement on a single pointer will yield much information, the disturbance arising from a measurement can be made as small as desired. At first sight, extracting only a tiny bit of information from a measurement might seem to be a strange thing to do. But as is well known to anyone who has spent hours taking data in an undergraduate laboratory not to mention months or years at a place like CERN a large uncertainty on an individual measurement is not necessarily a problem. By simply averaging over enough trials, one can establish as precise a measure as one has patience for; at least until systematic errors come to dominate. Aharonov called this a weak measurement because the coupling between the system and the pointer is assumed to be too weak for us to resolve how much the pointer shifts by on just a single trial. Under normal circumstances, the result of a weak measurement the average shift of pointers that have interacted with many identically prepared systems is exactly the same as the result of a traditional or strong measurement. It is, in other words, the expectation value we are all taught to calculate when we learn quantum theory. However, the low strength of the measurement offers a whole new set of insights into the quantum world by providing us with a clear operational way to talk about what systems are doing between measurements. This can be understood by considering a protocol known as postselection (see figure 1). To see what post-selection is all about, lets consider a simple experiment. Suppose we start at time t=0 by placing some electrons as precisely as we can
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
at position x=0. We know from Heisenbergs uncertainty principle that their velocity will be enormously uncertain, so we will have essentially no idea where an electron will be after, say, 1 second. But if we place a detector 1 metre away at x=1, any given electron will always have some chance of being spotted there at t=1 because the wavepacket has spread out over all space. However, when we make a measurement of where the wavepacket is, it may collapse to be at x=1, or to be elsewhere. Now suppose we take one of these electrons that appeared at x = 1, which is what we mean by postselection, and ask ourselves how fast it had been travelling. Anyone with common sense would say that it must have been going at about 1m/s, since it got from x=0 to x=1 in 1s. Yet anyone well trained in quantum mechanics knows the rules: we cannot know the position and the velocity simultaneously, and the electron did not follow any specific trajectory from x=0 to x = 1. And since we never directly measured the velocity, we have no right to ask what that value was. To see why Bohrs followers would not accept the seemingly logical conclusion that the electron had
As anyone who has spent hours taking data in an undergraduate laboratory knows, a large uncertainty on an individual measurement is not necessarily a problem
37
+2
discard
discard
possible pointer positions
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
+1 weak value
+2
If you do a weak enough measurement of the velocity you reduce the disturbance that the measurement makes on the position of the electron to nearly zero
38
Post-selected weak measurements give physicists a whole new view of the quantum world. (a) They involve a system (the wavefunction) interacting with a meter (shown here by a pointer) in a measurement interaction region. A separate measurement is made of the wavefunction once it has interacted with the pointer, which collapses the wavefunction either into the desired state (green light) or some other state (red light). (b) The trick in weak measurement is to repeat this process on many identically prepared systems. Each time a red light goes off, the corresponding pointer is discarded; each time a green light goes off, the pointer is kept. In this way, a collection of pointers is obtained, which all correspond to systems that ended up in the desired final state. Since the measurement was weak, there is a great uncertainty in pointer position. But since we have many pointers, we can find their average deflection a number termed the weak value.
been travelling at 1m/s, imagine what would happen if you decided to measure the velocity after releasing the electron at x=0 but before looking for it at x=1. At the moment of this velocity measurement, you would find some random result (remember that the preparation ensured a huge velocity uncertainty). But the velocity measurement would also disturb the position whatever velocity you find, the electron would forget that it had started at x=0, and end up with the same small chance of appearing at x=1 no matter what velocity your measurement revealed. Nothing about your measurement would suggest that
the electrons that made it to x=1 were any more or less likely to have been going at 1m/s than the electrons that did not. But if you do a weak enough measurement of the velocity by using some appropriate device you reduce the disturbance that the measurement makes on the position of the electron to nearly zero. So if you repeat such a measurement on many particles, some fraction of them (or subensemble, to use the jargon) will be found at the x=1 detector a second later. To ask about the velocity of the electrons in this subensemble, we can do what would be natural for any
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
classical physicist: instead of averaging the positions of all the pointers, average only the subset that interacted with electrons successfully detected at x=1. The formalism of weak values provides a very simple formula for such conditional measurements. If the system is prepared in an initial state |i and later found in final state |f , then the average shift of pointers designed to measure some observable A will correspond to a value of f|A|i/ f|i, where f|i is the overlap of initial and final states. If no post-selection is performed at all (i.e. if you average the shifts of all the pointers, regardless of which final state they reach), this reduces to the usual quantum-mechanical expectation value i|A|i. Without the post-selection process, weak measurement just agrees with the standard quantum formalism; but if you do postselect, weak measurement provides something new. If you work this formula out for the case we have been discussing, you find that the electrons that reached x=1 were indeed going at 1m/s on average. This in no way contradicts the uncertainty principle you cannot say precisely how fast any individual particle was travelling at any particular time. But it is striking that we now know that the average result of such a measurement will yield exactly what common sense would have suggested. What we are arguing and this admittedly is a controversial point is that weak measurements provide the clearest operational definition for quantities such as the average velocity of the electrons that are going to arrive at x=1. And since it does not matter how exactly you do the measurement, or what other measurements you choose to do in parallel, or even just how weak the measurement is, it is very tempting to say that this value, this hypothetical measurement result, is describing something thats really out there, whether or not a measurement is performed. We should stress: this is for now only a temptation, albeit a tantalizing one. The question of what the reality behind a quantum state is if such a question is even fair game for physics remains a huge open problem.
Two-slit interferometers The possibility of studying such subensembles has made weak measurements very powerful for investigating long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics. For instance, in the famous Youngs double-slit experiment, we cannot ask how any individual particle got to the screen, let alone which slit it traversed, because if we measure which slit each particle traverses, the interference pattern disappears. Richard Feynman famously called this the only mystery in quantum mechanics (see box on p40). However, in 2007 Howard Wiseman at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, realized that because of the ability of weak measurements to describe subensembles we can ask, for instance, what the average velocity of particles reaching each point on the screen is, or what their average position was at some time before they reached that point on the screen. In fact, in this way, we can build up a set of average trajectories for the particles, each leading to one point on the final interference pattern. It is crucial to note that we cannot state that any individual
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
particle follows any one of these trajectories. Each point on a trajectory describes only the average position we expect to find if we carry out thousands or millions of very uncertain measurements of position, and post-select on finding the particle at a later point on the same trajectory. Our group at the University of Toronto has actually carried out this particle-trajectory experiment on single photons sent through an interferometer, which then combine to create an archetypal Youngs double-slit interference pattern. Our photons, which all had the same wavelength, were generated in an optically pumped quantum dot before being sent down two arms of the interferometer and then being made to recombine, with their interference pattern being recorded on a CCD camera. Before the photons reached the screen, however, we sent them through a piece of calcite, which rotates their polarization by a small amount that depends on the direction the photon is travelling in. So by measuring the polarization shift, which was the basis of our weak measurement, we could calculate their direction and thus (knowing they are travelling at the speed of light) determine their velocity. The polarization of the transmitted photon in effect serves as the pointer, carrying some information about the system (in this case, the photons velocity). We in fact measured the polarization rotation at each point on the surface of the CCD, which gave us a conditional momentum for the particles that had reached that point. By adjusting the optics, we could repeat this measurement in a number of different planes between the double slit and the final screen. This enabled us to connect the dots and reconstruct a full set of trajectories (Science 332 1170) as shown in figure 1.
Practical message Dylan Mahler and Lee Rozema working on an optical table in the authors lab at the University of Toronto, carrying out precisely the sort of experiment that theorists had suggested should be designed to define weak measurements in the first place.
Back to the uncertainty principle Throughout this article, we have made use of the idea that any measurement of a particle must disturb it and the more precise the measurement, the greater the disturbance. Indeed, this is often how Heisenbergs uncertainty principle is described. However, this description is flawed. The uncertainty principle proved in our textbooks says nothing about measurement disturbance but, rather, places limits on how precisely a quantum state can specify two conjugate properties such as position, x, and momentum, p, 39
on a tomographic-style technique suggested by Ozawa himself in 2004, while the other by our group at Toronto (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 100404) used weak measurement, as suggested by Wiseman and his coworker Austin Lund in 2010, to directly measure the average disturbance experienced by a subensemble.
according to Heisenbergs formula x p/2, where is Plancks constant divided by 2 p. But as Masanao Ozawa from Tohoku University in Japan showed in 2003, it is also possible to calculate the minimum disturbance that a measurement must impart (Phys. Rev. A 67 042105). As expected, Ozawa found that the more precise a measurement the more it must disturb the quantum particle. Surprisingly, however, the detailed values predicted by his result said that it should be possible to make a measurement with less disturbance than predicted by (inappropriately) applying Heisenbergs formula to the problem of measurement disturbance. At first, it seemed unclear whether one could conceive of an experimental test of Ozawas new relationship at all. To establish, for example, the momentum disturbance imparted by measuring position, you would need to ascertain what this momentum was before the position measurement and then again afterwards to see by how much it had changed. And if you did this by performing traditional (strong) measurements of momentum, those measurements themselves would disturb the particle yet again, and Ozawas formula would no longer apply. Nevertheless, two teams of researchers have recently been able to illustrate the validity of Ozawas new relationship (and the failure of Heisenbergs formula for describing measurement disturbance). One experiment, carried out in 2012 by a team at the Vienna University of Technology (Nature Phys. 8 185), relied
Uncertainty in the real world Weak measurements not only provide unique tools for answering fundamental physical questions, but also open new directions in practical real-world applications by improving measurement precision. Remember that the average pointer shifts predicted for weak measurements are inversely proportional to f|i, the overlap of the initial and final states. So if the overlap is small, the pointer shift may be extremely large larger than could ever occur without post-selection. This idea of weak value amplification has in fact been used to perform several extremely sensitive measurements, including one by Onur Hosten and Paul Kwiat at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to measure the spin Hall effect of light (Science 319 787) and another by John Howells group at the University of Rochester in New York (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601), in which the angle of photons bouncing off a mirror was measured to an accuracy of 200 femtoradians. Of course, there is a price to pay. By adjusting the overlap between initial and final states to be very small, you make the probability of a successful postselection tiny. In other words, you throw out most of your photons. But on the rare occasions when the post-selection succeeds, you get a much larger result than you otherwise would have. (Howells group typically detected between about 1% and 6% of photons.) Going through the maths, it turns out this is a statistical wash: under ideal conditions, the signal-tonoise ratio would be exactly the same with or without the post-selection. But conditions are not always ideal certain kinds of technical noise do not vary quickly enough to be averaged away by simply accumulating more photons. In these cases, it turns out that post-selection is a good bet: in return for throwing away photons that were not helping anyway, you can amplify your signal (Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 010405 and 107 133603). In fact, measurements enhanced by weak-value amplification are now attracting growing attention in many fields including magnetometry, biosensing and spectroscopy of atomic and solidstate systems. As often happens in physics, something that began as a quest for new ways to define answers to metaphysical questions about nature has led not only to a deeper understanding of the quantum theory itself, but even to the promise of fantastic new technologies. Future metrology techniques may be much in debt to this abstract theory of weak measurement, but one should remember that the theory itself could never have been devised without asking down-toearth questions about how measurements are actually done in the laboratory. Weak measurements are yet another example of the continual interplay between theory and experiment that makes physics what it is. n
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
40
21st International Congress on Photonics in Europecollocated with LASER World of PHOTONICS 2013
Ma d
n Germ ei
an
y
EXACTLY
WHAT YOU WANT
LIMES 170
by
LPTM 30
NEW
KNOW-HOW BUSINESS?
Visit us at the
OPTICAL BEAM HANDLING SYSTEMS POSITIONING SYSTEMS
BY APPLYING IT CORRECTLY. THE WORLD OF PHOTONICS CONGRESS 40 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE THAT COUNTS
As the leading technical congress since 1973 and one of the top three conferences worldwide, the World of Photonics Congress together with the practice-oriented application panels convinces its approximately 5,000 participants from 65 countries because of its close link between science and industry. Well-founded knowledge as the basis for successful businessthat is the approach it uses to cover the photonics sector in its entirety.
Spherical Octagons
And
104
2.75 / 1.33
Access from Multiple Directions Mate with Industry Standard ConFlats Modular Internal Mounting Hardware Rigid External Mounting Brackets Precision Dimensions / Extreme UHV Performance Metric Available / Customs Encouraged
MESSE MNCHEN
info@kimphys.com Wilton, NH USA 603-878-1616
www.KimballPhysics.com
42
Some of us should venture to embark on a synthesis of facts and theories, albeit with secondhand and incomplete knowledge of some of them and at the risk of making fools of ourselves. So said Erwin Schrdinger in 1943 upon his foray from quantum physics into genetics. He would soon back up these words with his hugely influential 1944 book, What is Life?, in which he predicted that genetic information is stored within an aperiodic crystal an idea that would be confirmed by Francis Crick and James Watson less than a decade later when they discovered the structure of the double helix. Today, a small but increasing number of us would echo Schrdingers sentiments, even though the case has yet to be made conclusively for a causal link between some of the weirder aspects of quantum mechanics and biology. It is certainly true that although many examples can be found in the literature dating back half a century, there is still no widespread acceptance that quantum mechanics that baffling yet powerful theory of the subatomic world might play a crucial role in biological processes. Of course, biology is, at its most basic, chemistry, and chemistry is built on the rules of quantum mechanics in the way atoms and molecules behave and fit together. But biologists have (until recently) been dismissive of the counterintuitive aspects of the theory they feel it to be unnecessary, preferring their traditional balland-stick models of the molecular structures of life. Likewise, physicists have been reluctant to venture into the messy and complex world of the living cell. Why should they when they can test their theories far more cleanly in the controlled environment of the physics lab, where they at least feel they have a chance of understanding what is going on? But now, experimental techniques in biology have become so sophisticated that the time is ripe for testing a few ideas familiar to quantum physicists.
Sticking together Of all the quantum processes suggested as playing a role in biology which include quantum coherence, superposition and entanglement one of the least contentious and best studied is quantum tunnelling. This is the mechanism whereby a subatomic particle, such as an electron, proton or even a larger atomic nucleus, does not have enough energy to punch through a potential barrier (essentially a force field), but instead behaves as a spread-out fuzzy entity that can leak through the barrier and so occasionally find itself on the other side. This phenomenon is familiar in physics and is the mechanism responsible for radioactive decay and nuclear fusion. Quantum tunnelling is also well known in chemistry, for example in the form of hydrogen tunnelling in hydrogen-bonded dimer molecules, such as benzoic acid. It turns out that even in biology it is now well established that electrons quantum tunnel in enzymes, allowing certain chemical processes to speed up by several orders of magnitude. But one particular question that I, and others, have been exploring over the past few years is whether quantum tunnelling of hydrogen nuclei (protons) in the form of a hydrogen bond
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
43
N N
N N O
adenine
thymine
One of the two base pairs comprising DNA, the adeninethymine pair is joined together by two hydrogen bonds in the configuration shown, known as the canonical structure. Occasionally, both hydrogen nuclei (protons) in these bonds can switch allegiance and travel along the dashed lines to be close to the opposite half of the base pair, forming the tautomeric structure. Replication of the base pair while in this form leads to an error in the genetic code a mutation.
(Rev. Mod. Phys.35724). The protons spend most of their time in their deeper wells, but can occasionally tunnel across to the shallow well to form the tautomeric structure. A mutation can then take place only if the rarer tautomeric form remains stable during the replication process. What could happen, for example, is that an AT base pair in DNA could turn into its tautomeric form, A*T*. Then, when the two strands of DNA split, the tautomer of adenine will now bind to cytosine (A*C). This would cause an error in the genetic code (because the new strand now has a C replacing a T in its sequence) and hence a mutation.
This could provide information on how the tunnelling process is affected within the busy, warm environment of a living cell
44
Modelling mutation Half a century on from Lwdins double-proton tunnelling proposal, experiments by Lorena Beese and colleagues at Duke University in the US in 2011 look to have at least confirmed the hypothesis put forward by Watson and Crick that tautomeric forms of DNA bases can cause mutations (Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108 17644). However, the mechanism by which canonical base pairs become tautomeric remains unconfirmed. Many computational chemistry groups around the world have, over the past two decades, attempted to model the process of double proton transfer in the adeninethymine base pair. (This base pair is chosen because it is simpler to model than cytosineguanine, which is joined by three hydrogen bonds rather than two.) In recent years, a method called density functional theory (DFT) has emerged as the frontrunner among the various computational methods to model the structure of large molecules and manyatom systems. In this approach, the properties of a many-electron system can be determined accurately by examining its electron density. DFT calculations are carried out by large computer codes that have become so sophisticated that non-aficionados can use them essentially as black boxes into which one feeds information about the system of interest (such as a crystal or a protein). These codes have been successfully used to tackle problems in material science, condensed-matter physics, computational
chemistry and, more recently, nuclear structure and molecularbiology. But even incorporating into the calculation the behaviour and structure of hundreds of atoms that make up a section of DNA is not likely to be sufficient to produce a realistic model. Lone DNA is an example of what is known as an open quantum system, whereby the surrounding environment can influence its behaviour. It is known, for example, that in the case of 5-Bromouracil a molecule similar to adenine the presence of water molecules completely alters the shape of the double well, making the rarer tautomeric form more energetically favourable than the canonical one, suggesting that adenine might be similarly affected inside the cell. The approach being adopted by my PhD student, Adam Godbeer, at the University of Surrey working with theoretical chemists at University College London, led by Michaelides, involves using DFT to calculate very accurately the shape of the potential energy surface by taking into account as much of the structural information of the DNA base pair as possible, constrained as always by numerical complexity and computational power when dealing with manybody systems. This static potential energy surface is then used to calculate the time evolution of the proton tunnelling process. An added complication is the presence and influence of the external environment, for this is an open quantum system where the surrounding water molecules must also be taken into account. This leads to what is called a decoherence, or dissipative, term in the quantum-mechanical equations, which could provide information on how the tunnelling process is affected within the busy, warm environment of a living cell. In parallel with this theoretical work, an experiment being conducted at Surrey, led by molecular biologist Johnjoe McFadden, is also attempting to pin down whether proton tunnelling plays a role in tautomeric mutagenesis. The experiment involves replacing the protons in the hydrogen bonds with their more massive isotope, deuterons, and seeing if the mutation rate changes when the heavier isotope is present. This is done by replicating short strands of DNA in deuterated water and using a powerful technique called a polymerase chain reaction to produce many copies of the strands very quickly. As the double helix splits and each strand pairs up with a new one made from the raw material available in its surroundings, use is made of the deuterium in the water for some of the hydrogen bonds. If quantum tunnelling plays a role in mutagenesis we might expect to see a drop in the mutation rate since deuterons, with twice the mass of protons, will tunnel much more rarely.
Complicating factors Unfortunately, I am learning that nothing is ever that straightforward in biology and although early results point tentatively towards Lwdins proposal being confirmed a number of other quantum nuclear effects must be taken into account. For example, the heavier deuteron means that the vibrational frequency of the chemical bond it forms is affected.
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Breaking barriers Quantum tunnelling of hydrogen in DNA is one of many quantum processes in nature being explored by physicists and biologists.
Heavier atoms will (classically) lead to lower vibration frequencies or, viewed quantum mechanically, a lower zero-point energy. More energy must therefore be supplied to break the bond, which in turn lowers the measured rate. Other quantum nuclear effects, such as zero-point motion, are already known to be important in hydrogen bonds, and if a proton in a hydrogen bond is replaced by a deuteron then the structure of the bond is altered (the Ubbelohde effect), as will be the shape of the potential energy surface and hence the tunnelling probability. The bottom line is that absolute quantitative comparisons between theory and experiment are always very difficult in complex biological systems. While it is known that an isolated nucleotide base in the lab can exist in its rare tautomeric form between 0.1% and 1% of the time, this will not be the same as the rate inside living cells where polymerase enzymes have error-correcting mechanisms that can achieve fidelities up to 1 error in 10 8 or better. This errorcorrecting process is of course not included in any theoretical models. In any case, it is known that mutations take place for a variety of reasons and disentangling what fraction of these might be down to quantum nuclear effects is a huge challenge. Whether or not Lwdins hypothesis is confirmed, his 1963 paper should at least be celebrated for a statement he makes in the very first paragraph: The electronic and protonic structure of biologically interesting molecules and systems has to be treated by quantum chemistry. This has led to the opening of a new field, which has been called sub-molecular biology or quantum biology. To my knowledge, that was the first ever use of the term, showing that even if we are reluctant to credit Schrdinger with first establishing the field of quantum biology, it is certainly half a century old. n
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
45
Immanuel Bloch describes how recent experiments with ultracold atoms are bringing us closer to realizing Richard Feynmans dream of a universal quantum simulator
Many of the most interesting phenomena in condensed-matter physics from high-temperature superconductivity to quantum magnetism share one frustrating characteristic: they are extremely difficult to simulate on a computer. The reason is not hard to understand. Suppose we have a system of N spin-1/2 particles, such as electrons. In order to describe the quantum state of this system on a classical computer, we would need to store 2 N coefficients in the computers memory. For a small system of only N=300 particles, this equates to a memory size that
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
exceeds the number of protons estimated to exist in the entire visible universe. And of course, in order to perform actual quantum-mechanical calculations on this system, we would also need to do arithmetical operations on all of these coefficients. To make matters worse, the size of the memory problem grows exponentially: adding only one more spin-1/2 particle to the problem requires you to double the size of the computers memory. Condensed-matter physicists have developed clever approximations and numerical methods that
Immanuel Bloch is a physicist at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and scientific director of the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany, e-mail immanuel. bloch@mpq.mpg.de
47
I Bloch, MPQ
allow them to work around this fundamental problem, and in many cases these techniques have given us good answers to specific problems. However, in other systems, especially where the electrons interact strongly with each other, these approximations fail or become invalid as a result of the rapid growth of entanglement effects in many-body systems. This rapid growth can be especially severe for a system that has been pushed far from equilibrium and then allowed to evolve. But does this mean we have to give up on trying to understand how these quantum manybody problems work? Or is there another solution? Richard Feynman certainly thought there was. In his visionary 1981 lecture Simulating physics with computers Feynman outlined a radically different approach to this fundamental problem: he suggested that it might be possible to use highly controllable quantum systems to simulate the quantum dynamics of other classically intractable problems. The idea of a quantum simulator was born a quantum machine that could imitate any quantum system, including the physical world. As with many of Feynmans brilliant ideas, this one has taken some time to take shape in practice. Within the past few years, however, groups around the world have begun to build such quantum simulators in many different physical implementations, including BoseEinstein condensates, degenerate Fermi gases, photons, trapped ions and arrays of superconducting qubits or quantum dots. These systems all have the virtue of being tunable, meaning that all their interactions, potentials and other parameters can be engineered to suit a certain model. Thanks to this property, there is a very good chance that we will be able to use such model systems to realize completely new forms of matter under extreme conditions that cannot be achieved in any other system and in the process, start to investigate some previously intractable problems.
Trapped in a lattice The root of many condensed-matter problems lies in understanding the behaviour of electrons in a solid. In the simplest approximation, such electrons can be described as moving through a periodic potential 48
generated by the positively charged ionic cores of the atoms that make up the solid, which are arranged in a lattice structure. One way to create such a periodic potential in the laboratory is to use an optical lattice formed by laser beams. When the beams are superimposed on each other, their optical interference generates a pattern of regularly spaced potential wells. These wells are deep enough that atoms that have been cooled to temperatures just above absolute zero can be trapped in them, like eggs in an egg carton. These ultracold atoms then experience the lattice pattern of dark and bright regions as a perfect, defect-free, periodic potential and can move from one lattice site to the next via quantummechanical tunnelling. The great advantage of such a set-up is that many parameters of this periodic potential are under the complete control of the experimentalist. For example, the depth of the wells can be easily changed by adjusting the intensity of the laser beams, and the lattices geometry can be shaped by interfering laser beams under different angles. This flexibility allows researchers to create any geometrical pattern, from a simple cubic-type lattice structure to triangular and hexagonal lattices like those found in graphene. In recent years, the collective behaviour of interacting bosonic and fermionic atoms in such optical lattices has been a major focus of investigations with ultracold atoms. Then, in 2011, prospects for using ultracold atoms to perform quantum simulations took a dramatic step forward when two research teams (led by Markus Greiner at Harvard University and Stefan Kuhr and myself in Munich) reported that we had successfully obtained high-resolution images of individual atoms in an optical lattice. The resolution of the imaging in these so-called quantum gas microscopes is so good that we can discern the occupation of neighbouring lattice sites. To put that into perspective, if we had this kind of resolution in a real electronic material, we would be able to take single snapshots of the position of all the electrons in the material. The way the experiments work is that ultracold atoms in a BoseEinstein condensate (BEC) an exotic state of matter in which all the component
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Mapping fluctuations Just being able to image single atoms in a lattice is pretty exciting in itself, but it gets better. If you take a close look at the reconstructed images in figure2bc, you will see some gaps, or defects, in the lattice. These missing atoms represent individual thermal fluctuations, and they are directly visible in a single shot of the experiment. Being able to see single thermal fluctuations in such a system gives us an extremely precise thermometer, which has allowed researchers to determine temperatures down to the 100pK level using just a single image. Perhaps more importantly, the quantum gas microscope also enables us to directly observe the zero-temperature quantum fluctuations of a manybody system. Many readers will have encountered such quantum fluctuations in the classic textbook example of a single quantum particle in the absolute ground state of a harmonic oscillator. In this simple system, the position of the particle remains undetermined within a region given by the extension of the ground state wavefunction in sharp contrast with the behaviour of a classical particle at zero temperature, for which position and momentum would always be well defined. A quantum many-body system also exhibits such inherent quantum fluctuations, and when they become very strong, these fluctuations can give rise to a phase transition specifically, to a quantum phase transition that occurs even at zero temP hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Atoms in a BoseEinstein condensate (BEC) can be described by one macroscopic wavefunction, but at the same time a BEC in a lattice exhibits large fluctuations in the number of atoms per lattice site, n, thanks to an uncertainty-like relationship between n and the wavefunction phase (n>1). In contrast, if the atoms are in a different phase of matter, known as a Mott insulator, strong repulsive interactions between the atoms destroy the coherent matter-wave field of the BEC, but they also suppress fluctuations in particle number. The result is an almost perfect ordering of atoms in the lattice, with one atom occupying every lattice site. (a) Reconstructed atom positions in a BEC and (bc) strongly interacting Mott insulators. The hole in c actually corresponds to a region where two atoms are occupying every central lattice site. This region appears dark because the presence of near-resonant laser light induces interactions between pairs of atoms trapped in the same lattice site, causing both atoms in the pair to escape the lattice. Hence, bright areas in the images correspond to odd-numbered lattice occupancies.
perature. Quantum gas microscopes thus offer us the chance to learn how the re-ordering of a system takes place during a phase transition, and on what timescales. This is an unparalleled glimpse into the inner workings and dynamics of many-body systems, and one that would simply not be possible in this detail for a real material. In addition to using the phenomenal spatial resolution of quantum gas microscopes to observe single atoms, one can also perform other experiments.
49
I Bloch, MPQ
atoms share the same wavefunction, and thus behave like a single matter wave are first trapped in a 2D plane. The atoms are then transferred into an eggcarton-shaped lattice potential of light, which at the same time helps to bring the atoms into an interesting, strongly interacting quantum phase. Before the atoms are imaged, the depth of the lattices is suddenly increased to stop the atoms moving and hold them tight in space. Then, a laser beam with a frequency near resonance with an atomic transition is switched on, causing the atoms to fluoresce like tiny nanoscopic light bulbs. The resulting array of nanobulbs can be imaged using a high-resolution microscope objective (figure 1). The precise moment when the first photons of the imaging laser beam are scattered off the atoms is crucial for the quantum-measurement process. Initially, the atoms are in a complicated quantum superposition state of different spatial configurations, with a many-body wavefunction (x1 xN). The measurement process collapses this wavefunction, and the atoms are observed to be in one of many possible spatial configurations. Image-processing algorithms allow us to reconstruct the position of each individual atom in the lattice, but the particular configuration of atoms observed in a single snapshot is, of course, completely random. Only by repeating the experiment many times does it become possible to build up a histogram of the occurrences of different spatial configurations. Examples of such reconstructed particle positions for two distinct phases of matter a BEC and a Mott insulator can be seen in figure 2.
high-resolution objective
z 16 m x (a) Ultracold atoms trapped in a single plane of an optical lattice are imaged using a highresolution microscope that detects the atoms laser-induced fluorescence. (b) A typical image of atoms trapped in the lattice. y
Quantum frontiers: Quantum simulat ion 3 Controlling single spins in an optical lattice
b addressing laser beam microwave 6.8 GHz
y x
c
2 m
(a) Controlling the spins of atoms in an optical lattice requires a laser beam to address the atoms as well as a microwave field. When this addressing laser beam is focused onto a single atom, it shifts the frequency of a transition between two spin states of the atom. If the frequency of the microwave field is set so that it is resonant with this shifted transition frequency, only the addressed atoms will have their spins flipped when the field is applied. By moving the addressing beam to different lattice sites, arbitrary spin patterns at the single-spin level can be prepared (bc). Such precise control of spin patterns is a crucial first step to a number of interesting experiments, including the creation of a practical, scalable quantum computer using ultracold atoms.
For example, if we send a laser beam in the reverse direction through the high-resolution microscope objective, we can focus the beam onto single sites of the lattice and selectively flip the spin states of each atom (in other words, between different hyperfine spin states) in the microscopic array. By moving the beam along a controlled pathway, an arbitrary spin pattern can thereby be imprinted onto the gases. The spin-flipped atoms can be made visible by first removing the unaffected (non-addressed) atoms and then imaging the remaining (addressed) ones. Examples of such single-atom spin orderings can be seen in figure 3. Once these spin patterns have been prepared, they could form the initial conditions for observing interesting non-equilibrium dynamics. For example, one can track the motion of a singleparticle impurity in the many-body system, observe the dynamics of domain walls between regions of different magnetization, or track the collision of two spins at energies of a few pico-electron volts. The possibilities for interesting configurations abound.
Artificial fields Another condensed-matter problem that ultracoldatom researchers have long wanted to simulate concerns the effect of a magnetic field on the electrons in a 2D electron gas. For a single electron moving in free space, the presence of a magnetic field with a component perpendicular to the electrons direction of motion creates a Lorentz force that pulls the electron into a circular cyclotron orbit. If the electron 50
is instead moving through a conductor, this same Lorentz force produces a voltage difference across the conductor the Hall effect. But when a 2D electron gas in a very pure semiconductor at very low temperatures is exposed to a magnetic field, something more dramatic can happen: the Hall effect becomes a quantum phenomenon, with the conductance in the semiconductor equal to e2/h. The coefficient can take either integer or fractional values, and the fractional quantum Hall effect, in particular, remains a hot topic in condensed-matter research more than 30 years after its discovery. However, a severe problem exists in trying to simulate such physics with ultracold atomic gases: because atoms are neutral, they do not experience any Lorentz force in a magnetic field. One might expect that this would prevent quantum-Hall-type effects from being realized in an ultracold-atom system, but in fact there may be a way around this problem. To understand how we might overcome such an apparently fundamental difficulty, let us take a closer look at what, on a quantum-mechanical level, the effect of a magnetic field, B, on a charged particle really is. When an electron encircles an area with an enclosed magnetic flux, its wavefunction acquires a phase shift. This is known as the AharonovBohm phase, and its value is given by AB=2 /0 where is the flux enclosed in the trajectory of the electron and 0, the magnetic flux quantum, is equal to the ratio of Plancks constant to the charge on an electron. The quantum-mechanical effect of the magP hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
I Bloch, MPQ
This is an unparalleled glimpse into the inner workings and dynamics of many-body systems
netic field on the electron is thus to introduce a phase shift on a closed-loop trajectory. Hence, if we are able to engineer such a phase shift in the wavefunction of a neutral atom by other means, we will have simulated essentially the same effect. Several possibilities have been outlined for doing this using quantum optical control techniques. One can, for example, engineer a Hamiltonian such that when an atom, initially prepared in a single quantum state, is moved slowly in space in a way that does not induce heating (adiabatically), no quantum jumps to other energy levels occur. For a suitable choice of Hamiltonian, the particle can pick up a phase during this state evolution the so-called Berrys phase which depends on the geometric properties of the Hamiltonian. The Berrys phase acquired in this adiabatic state evolution then formally corresponds to the AharonovBohm phase shift of a charged particle. Another possibility is to use laser-assisted hopping of particles in an optical lattice to achieve the same net phase shift. Imagine two neighbouring lattice sites that are shifted in energy relative to each other, such that a single particle cannot move to the next site without some additional help, owing to energy conservation. Laser light tuned to the right frequency can provide this missing energy, allowing the particle to hop to the next site. Crucially, during this hopping process, the matter wave of the atoms inherits the phase of the optical wave. Laser-assisted hopping thus allows one to tune almost at will the phase shift produced when an atom hops from one lattice site to the next, and to render this phase shift position-dependent. For example, an atom hopping around a 22 plaquette in a lattice (figure 4) thus picks up a phase shift of =1 2 corresponding to the AharonovBohm phase shift an electron would pick up when hopping around a lattice plaquette while being exposed to a magnetic field. The interesting thing about this second possibility is that in real materials, the achieved phase shift is limited by the strength of the applied magnetic field and is typically small. For ultracold atoms, however, such phase shifts can be tuned to any value between =0 and . In a real material, one would need to apply a magnetic field of several thousands of tesla some two orders of magnitude greater than the fields generated by todays strongest research magnets to achieve the same effect. How will matter behave under such extreme field strengths? The answer is that we dont really know we cannot calculate it, which is why it is worth doing the simulations. Some theorists have predicted that one might encounter states that are closely related to those of the fracP hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
ei1 B ei2 x
(a) An electron in a magnetic field B experiences a phase shift AB caused by the Aharonov Bohm effect as it traverses a closed loop. (b) A similar phase shift can be achieved for neutral atoms in an optical lattice by using a laser to make them hop around a 22 region of the lattice. Each hop along the x-direction imprints a phase shift i that depends on the y-position of the particle. The net phase shift of the neutral atom hopping around the closed path shown is then given by =12, corresponding to an effective magnetic field.
e eiAB
tional quantum Hall effect in 2D electron gases. However, there is also real potential for discovering new phases of matter. As you might imagine, there are plenty of pathways ahead for future research. One possibility would be to extend high-resolution imaging techniques to fermionic atoms, or even to polar molecules, which have strong electric dipole moments that give rise to long-range interactions. Being able to study such interactions at high resolution might bring an intriguing new perspective to our understanding of quantum matter. Topological phases of matter with new forms of excitations, such as Majorana fermions an elusive particle that is its own anti-particle, and has only recently been discovered in a condensedmatter setting could be realized and probed with ultracold atoms. Another fundamental topic that is currently much debated concerns how isolated quantum systems come into thermal equilibrium; more specifically, it would be interesting to know which observables show thermal-like behaviour after a certain evolution time. Being able to probe, with high spatial resolution, how non-local correlations in the system evolve in time would offer an exciting new way to unravel the secrets of these dynamics. One can only speculate, but I am sure Feynman would have been fascinated to see how far we have come in realizing his vision of a quantum simulator and the possibilities it offers for future research. n
2012 Nature Physics Insight: Quantum simulation Nature Phys. 8 263 nas and P hberg 2011 J Dalibard, F Gerbier, G Juzeliu Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms Rev.Mod. Phys. 83 1523 R P Feynman 1982 Simulating physics with computers Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467 D Jaksch and P Zoller 2005 The cold atoms Hubbard toolbox Ann. Phys. 315 52
51
Suppose you have a photon a single particle of light. This is a quantum system by nature, so it exists in a particular quantum state. The photon could, for example, be vertically polarized, horizontally polarized or even something in-between: a quantumsuperposition. So what happens when you send your photon to a receiver at some other location? This question sounds simple but the answer can tell us some quite fundamental and startling truths about nature. In fact, when a pair of photons possesses correlations much stronger than classically allowed entangled quantum states the implications of what we observe in so-called Bell tests are enough to have spooked even Albert Einstein, and many people thereafter. The consequences of these experimental and theoretical insights are profound as they conflict with our intuitive understanding of how the world works (see box on p54). As Richard Feynman wryly concluded: after people read [Einsteins paper on relativity], a lot of people understood [it] in some way or other, certainly more than 12. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Beyond these fundamental interests is the field of quantum communication the science of transmitting quantum states from one place to another. Information is often transmitted by using the aforementioned vertically polarized light to represent the 0, horizontally polarized to represent the 1 and a quantum superposition to represent a combination of 0 and 1 simultaneously. Quantum communication has received significant attention in the last few years owing to the discovery of quantum cryptography.
Quantum-assured security Quantum cryptography, or, more correctly, quantum key distribution (QKD), exploits the fundamental nature of quantum systems to change state upon measurement, allowing you to establish a common encryption key between yourself and a distant partner with the absolute certainty that if someone is eavesdropping, you will know about it. An eavesdropper would leave a trace and, if none is found, the key can be safely used to securely encode messages. These messages are sent using ordinary, classical communication channels, before being decoded by the distant party using their copy of the key. Traditional encryption techniques, in contrast, either rely on assumptions that certain mathematical operations are difficult to invert, or require the effort of a 52
trusted courier to physically carry the key from one location to the other. Because of this obvious and significant application, it is not just researchers tucked away in university laboratories who are interested. Several quantum-communication companies have also emerged over the last few years seeking to exploit the secure messaging that QKD allows, including ID Quantique in Switzerland, MagiQ in the US and QuintessenceLabs in Australia. Their efforts come on top of established programmes by the likes of HP, IBM, Mitsubishi, NEC, NTT and Toshiba. All of these companies and more are looking to develop real-world-applicable QKD devices for governments, banks and other security-focused clients. The devices that are being built and implemented today form the seeds of what could one day become a grander quantum internet interconnected networks of quantum-communication channels. These networks would permit not just quantum-secured communications, but also distributed quantum computation (several quantum computers working on the same problem in tandem) and other quantumenhanced information technologies. While the possibilities are exciting, quantum communication over long distances turns out to be really difficult. The culprit: transmission loss. Signals weaken in intensity when they travel long distances because photons get absorbed or scatter off mole cules, with the transmission loss getting exponentially worse with distance. Classical communication can cope with the high losses experienced over long distances by using repeater devices to boost the signal. But for quantum signals this approach does not work. Quantum signals cannot be perfectly cloned, which rules out standard repeaters, and tricks such as boosting the signals by transmitting many duplicates of each quantum state at the same time would defeat the purpose of encoding information into individual quantum systems in the first place: an eavesdropper could simply pick off and examine a subset of those duplicates, which outwardly would appear to be nothing more than regular loss. As it stands, the furthest that quantum-communication signals have been sent is only a few hundred kilometres. For applications such as quantum cryptography, that distance restriction means that your QKD system can at best allow you to securely communicate with someone just one or two cities away, which is hardly ideal in an increasingly globalized society. Moreover, in terms of physics research, it means that
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
important theories can only be verified by experimental tests up to a few hundred kilometres. Frustratingly, some of the proposed effects from the interplay of quantum mechanics and relativity would be too subtle to measure on this scale. So until we can somehow surpass the tyranny of distance, such new physics cannot be tested at all.
Into the void Fortunately for anyone involved in quantum communication, there is one environment where scattering happens to be practically absent over a very long distance: empty space. The near-vacuum environment beyond Earths atmosphere is ideal for low-loss optical transmission;
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
optical diffraction is the only transmission loss worth considering. So an obvious next step to take quantum communication beyond its terrestrial limitations is to deploy a satellite fitted with a transmitter and/or receiver that can implement quantum tasks such as QKD. As a bonus, this equipment could be used to look at fundamental questions within quantum physics in a regime that has never before been explored. The first step towards space-based quantum communication would be to place a satellite in a low-Earth orbit (LEO) i.e. at an altitude of less than 2000km. While a satellite in LEO can see only a small area of the Earths surface at once, it moves with a relatively high orbital velocity of about 8km/s, which ensures that its coverage includes all of the Earth at different,
Photons in space Quantum communication between a ground station and a satellite in space could look something like this laser guide star system at the Gemini North Observatory inHawaii.
53
sometimes multiple, times in a single day. In contrast, a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit (GSO) sits at an altitude of about 32000km, allowing coverage of almost 50% of the planet at all times, which means quick or even simultaneous QKD. But implementing a GSO system is more difficult and costly because such an orbit is necessarily much higher than LEO. GSO is therefore more of a long-term goal, perhaps once the economics of satellite-based quantum communication makes such an investment commercially viable. In this scenario, one could envision a constellation of quantum satellites, with several satellites communicating with each other and orbiting in a pattern that simultaneously covers all of the Earth, thereby expanding the future quantum internet to the global scale. Whichever satellite arrangement is used, its purpose is to act as a kind of relay between two ground stations in a way that allows them to establish a secure link. This link could be accomplished in a few different ways (see box opposite).
Fundamental science in space Several untested theories detail subtle effects that quantum states might experience over the distances, velocities and gravitation that a quantum-satellite platform could achieve. In fact, there is abundant fundamental physics at the intersection of quantum mechanics and general relativity that has never been tested, simply because we have never before had access to the relevant regimes. A quantum satellite would allow us to take the first step in testing the ories over large distances, at high relative speeds and under varying gravity. Consider this example: if a pair of entangled photons is prepared at some source location, split and then sent to two observers, the first observer to make a measurement will find one state, instantly determining in which state the other particle will be found when measured by the second observer. Special relativity, however, causes a complication in the cause-and-effect picture that we intuit: if the observers are some distance apart and moving away from each other, relativity dictates that this motion will influence the timing of the measurement events, depending on which observer you consider. In certain conditions, such as if both observers are equidistant from the source, both observers will conclude that their measurement was the second one, the first being done at the other platform. This presents a tricky puzzle for common interpretations of quantum entanglement, where the outcome of the second measurement is determined at the instant the first measurement produces a result. The puzzling question is at what point the outcome is determined, when the time-order of measurement events depends on which observer asks the question. One of the hopes of investigating such questions is to finally bring the famously incompatible quantum and relativity theories to a truce, or something like it. Quantum theory (describing the behaviours of the very small) and relativity theory (describing the behaviour of the very large) have both been thoroughly demonstrated to be the most accurate and precise models of the physical world, to the extent of their applicable regimes, that humankind has ever devised. Their incompatibility is almost embarrassing. Scientific experiments performed within new regimes have historically led to significant advancements of our knowledge and understanding of the inner workings of the universe. At present, humanitys data set of quantum knowledge comes from tests with maximum distances of hundreds of kilometres and maximum speeds of hundreds of kilometres per hour. In comparison, a LEO satellite would allow us to reach maximum distances of about 1000km and speeds in the tens of thousands of kilometres per hour, enabling us to test a litany of potential effects and quantum behaviours that cannot be achieved on the ground. The most clear-cut example to study is longdistance quantum entanglement, including verifying entanglement between photon pairs spanning Earth and space, checking how the quality of entanglement measurements scales with distance, as well as examining the effects of special relativity on entangled sysP hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
54
A
phy sic s wor ld.com
QKD at time t1
QKD at time t2
QKD
Earth
Earth
Global communication, such as fibre-optic broadband, could be made more robust by establishing a secure encryption key between two communicators that no-one else could possibly know. This could be done by using a satellite enabled with quantum technologies to act as a kind of relay between two ground stations to establish a secure key. QKD One way of doing this would be a trusted node approach (left), in which an orbiting satellite first establishes a key key 1 with station A via quantum key distribution (QKD), sending single photons one at a time either by uplink (from ground to satellite) or downlink (from satellite to ground). The B establishes another, satellite travels someAdistance and then different, key key 2 with station B. (QKD itself cannot transmit existing keys, but only generate new ones.) The satellite then encodes key 1 with key 2 (encrypting it) and transmits the result over radio communications to ground Earth station B, which uses the key it knows (key 2) to determine key 1. At this point both ground stations possess a shared secure key key 1 which enables them to communicate securely on the ground via the usual classical means. This approach comes with a caveat, however: the satellite knows the secure key that the ground stations will use. If a nefarious entity were to somehow penetrate the security of the satellite, which would be no small feat given a properly designed autonomous orbiter, then the security of the communication on the ground would be vulnerable. One has
to trust that the satellite is secure. Fortunately, it is possible to utilize a different approach such that the satellite can act as an untrusted node (right). Here, an orbiting satellite generates entangled photon pairs and transmits one photon of the pair to each of the ground stations A and B simultaneously. The entanglement correlations between the photon pairs allow A and B to extract a common secret key that even the satellite does not know. The ground stations could then compare their detection statistics, independent of the source, in a manner similar to a Bell test (see box opposite), allowing them to verify that no other party gained information about the states they received not even the satellite. (Another proposal reverses this idea, with each ground station generating and transmitting single photons that are received and entangled by the satellite, although this is considerably more technically challenging.) Verification of the trustworthiness of the source means that no assumptions have to be made about the security of the satellite, but it does mean that the satellite needs much more complex kit, including an entangled photon source and two telescopes that can be pointed independently. These extra complications make the trusted node, by comparison, seem like a good stepping stone for testing quantum encryption with a satellite, moving towards an untrusted node approach as a long-term solution.
tems (including the moving observers scenario above). Moreover, long-distance quantum teleportation experiments could be conducted the first baby steps towards realizing the famous Star Trek Beam me up, Scotty command may be only a few years away.
Meanwhile, back on Earth... For these experiments to be conducted any time soon, an actual design for a satellite must be nailed down and, of course, built. As for anything of a space-faring pedigree, this encompasses a number of technical challenges that need to be resolved. First and foremost is figuring out how to successfully transmit the quantum optical signal between the satellite and the ground station, which has been studied in increasing detail by various groups worldwide. The problem
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
that needs to be overcome is atmospheric loss not in space, but in the region near the ground station. Other effects to contend with include atmospheric turbulence, diffraction and background noise. Our own group at the Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC) in Waterloo, Canada, has recently concluded a comprehensive theoretical study, simultaneously incorporating all of the significant effects on the signal throughput, which has helped us to determine what overall design features of the satellite and ground station systems would be suitable. We also calculated the expected performance of the quantum optical signal for QKD and fundamental science endeavours. Another important technical challenge is to ensure that the quantum channel between the satellite and the ground station is precisely aligned as we need
The puzzling question is at what point the outcome is determined, when the time-order of measurement events depends on which observer asks the question
55
tinually keep in mind the more mundane physical constraints that we face: mass and power. We cannot expect the satellite on which we choose to house our quantum payload to carry up too much mass, or to provide too much power once it is in orbit. Many potential space-faring groups intend to install their equipment on a microsatellite, upon which mass and power are at a premium. Fortunately, designs of systems with the necessary low mass, that use low power and embedded hardware, are making rapid progress.
No small ambition Thomas Jennewein (pictured) is leading an effort to design and implement a quantum communication satellite, a miniature model of which is shown here.
to be certain that what we actually measure corresponds to the photon states that were prepared. This means that as well as accurately pointing the transmitter and receiver at each other, timing and optical polarization must be well aligned. What makes things even more complex is that the satellite changes position as it passes overhead, so the time delay and local polarization frame are constantly changing. The Global Positioning System (GPS) can give us timing accuracy down to 100ns, but this will not be enough to accurately identify which of the detected photons are from the transmitted photon stream and where within that stream they originate rather than from some source of background noise. Experiments will be performed at night to minimize light noise, but even then there is noise inherent to the detectors, which can unintentionally click even in the absence of a photon. To go beyond GPS capability will require additional techniques such as highprecision time-tagging of photon detections, pulsing beacon lasers according to a known pseudo-random sequence to which the transmitter and receiver can synchronize, and advanced post-processing. Aligning the photons polarization frame with that of the detector also requires some thought for good performance, these have to be within about 5 of each other. Again, GPS can help here, providing measurements of position and orientation that can be used to determine the correct compensation to apply. For some designs, the satellite could be rotated slowly as it passes over a ground station so that its polarization frame lines up with that on the ground. On-the-fly calibration could be done using a polarized beacon, whereby the receiver measures the polarization of the beacon and then aligns itself with that either by changing its physical orientation or by using an optical element. One other potential alignment method that we are studying at the IQC is based on analysis of the quantum signal itself. While designing this innovative equipment, part of which we plan to send into space, we must con-
Quantum space race Several research groups are pursuing the concept of a quantum satellite in friendly competition. Richard Hughes group at Los Alamos National Laboratory in the US has been pioneering aspects of QKD on space platforms for many years, and NASA has recently indicated renewed interest. Anton Zeilingers group at the University of Vienna in Austria has been working with the European Space Agency for several years towards deploying an entangled quantum transmitter on the International Space Station. Jian-Wei Pans group at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has been making considerable progress, with recent proof-of-concept experiments and a proposed launch date of 2016. Meanwhile, Alexander Lings group at the National University of Singapore is preparing to launch a small CubeSat with an enclosed entangled photon source on board. Last but not least, researchers at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Koganei, Japan, are developing their own QKD satellite demonstration. At the IQC we are working closely with the Canadian Space Agency and industry partners to design a quantum satellite. The approach we are pursuing favours using the quantum receiver as the satellite payload, i.e. a trusted node in an uplink configuration (see box on p55). Compared with a downlink with a satellite transmitter, this configuration suffers from more photons being lost as a result of atmospheric turbulence causing the beam to slightly deviate earlier in the transmission, thus having a stronger effect on pointing losses. This reduces the rate at which a quantum key could be generated because the loss hampering the photon transmission reduces our quantum-communication bandwidth. However, there are many advantages of an uplink: a quantum receiver apparatus is quite simple, robust and standardized as compared with a quantum transmitter; and a ground transmitter means that different quantum source designs can be easily utilized whenever it is appropriate. We are currently carrying out design-feasibility assessments in the laboratory, weeding out any potential problems before an actual satellite is built and sent into orbit. While it is not clear yet which group will be the first to get a fully working quantumcommunication platform into space, current progress is very promising. With the prospect of globalscale quantum communications and fundamental quantum science within new, unexplored regimes, the next few years are sure to be exciting. To boldly quantum where no-one has quantumed before. n
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
56
w.tandfonline.com
Become a fan on Facebook www.facebook.com/TandFPhysics Follow us on Twitter www.twitter.com/TandFPhysics
www.tandfonline.com
Become a fan on Facebook www.facebook.com/TandFPhysics
Contemporary Physics
www.tandfonline.com/cp
www.tandfonline.com/r/physics www.tandfonline.com/r/physics-free
* Journal of Modern Optics
www.tandfonline.com/jmo
Get FREE ONLINE ACCESS to to our ourportfolio portfolio Get14 14 days days free online access
Philosophical Magazine
www.tandfonline.com/ philmag
www.tandfonline.com
Coming soon
Your guide to products, services and expertise
physicsworld.com/connect
Reviews
Lowry Kirkby
Thirst for physics Leonard Susskinds popular series of lectures for the general public have been compiled in this book. The Theoretical Minimum: What You Need to Know to Start Doing Physics Leonard Susskind and George Hrabovsky 2013 Basic Books 20.00/$26.99hb 256pp
The mantra for popular-science books is to minimize the use of equations. In The Theoretical Minimum: What You Need to Know to Start Doing Physics, authors Leonard Susskind and George Hrabovsky have taken the opposite approach by producing a physics book for the educated general public that emphasizes the mathematics needed to solve physics problems. When I first heard about the premise of the book, I was intrigued. Is there a group of people who want to solve physics and mathematics problems, and not simply read about the gee-whiz physics that is the standard fare of most popular-science books? To my surprise, apparently there is. The Theoretical Minimum is the product of a series of lectures that Susskind presented for the general public in the Stanford area all of which
can be found video-recorded on the Web and these lectures attracted a large following of people who were, in Susskinds words hungry to learn physics. Indeed, Hrabovsky himself was one of those people. Now president of the Madison Area Science and Technology organization, which is devoted to research and education, Hrabovsky has no formal scientific training but taught himself physics and mathematics presumably through courses and books similar to The Theoretical Minimum. This thirst for academic learning outside of a conventional university degree reminded me of the recent and rapid growth of so-called massive open online courses, or MOOCs: open-access (i.e. free) university courses that give people of any age or background the chance to learn about a subject that inter-
59
Reviews
ate level in the UK since it is not part of the Core of Physics syllabus issued by the Institute of Physics. Indeed, I did not cover these subjects during my undergraduate physics degree at the University of Oxford. As such, I can attest to the readability of the book: I was able to understand what an equation that I had never seen before represents, without having to pick apart and understand every term that makes it up. In fact, I found it satisfying to finally gain a basic understanding of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, since I had sometimes wished we had covered these subjects in my degree. I even felt like I had been partially duped during my degree after reading Susskinds comment that the Euler Lagrange equations comprise all of classical physics in a nutshell! There is, however, a flip side to my satisfaction at filling in some holes left by my undergraduate degree: I found myself wondering how much someone who has not had formal mathematics or physics training would really get out of The Theoretical Minimum. The concepts presented in it are not only advanced, but also abstract and unintuitive,
I found it satisfying to finally gain a basic understanding of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics
and I would imagine they would be quite daunting to someone new to the subject. At the very least, they would leave newcomers scratching their heads. The book is really about explaining mathematics and abstract physics and does very little to relate these concepts back to everyday life. In addition, in many instances I thought that the explana-
tion would benefit from a diagram or two. Susskind is one of the fathers of string theory, arguably one of the most abstract and theoretical areas of physics. However, the rest of us are not: we need a more tangible way tolearn. In summary, although this book probably offers more than many readers will have bargained for, it does provide a clear description of advanced classical physics concepts, and gives readers who want a challenge the opportunity to exercise their brain in new ways. Thanks to the breadth of accompanying information (for example, exercises and video-recorded lectures on the Web), it also enables them to learn at their own pace, and hopefully most will get some fun and satisfaction from it. If members of the general public really are pulling for these types of courses, ones that offer rigour and a challenge, I enthusiastically encourage them.
Lowry Kirkby is a PhD student in biophysics at the University of California, Berkeley, US, and the author of Physics: a Student Companion (2011 Scion Publishing), e-mail lowry.kirkby@berkeley.edu
Shut ter stock/Richard Paul Kane
physicsworld.com
60
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Reviews
those who lack the right array of lasers, beam splitters and so on, a site like this is surely the next best thing. The Quantum Exchange also includes up-to-date links to some excellent older resources, such as the pages on laser cooling and BoseEinstein condensation developed by physics educators at the University of Colorado in the early 2000s. Like any Web repository, it does contain a few links to resources that no longer exist, but not enough to make it frustrating.
There are a lot of Internet resources that are designed to help teachers, students and members of the public understand and explore all manner of quantum phenomena ranging from classic problems such as the particle in a box to the sort of cutting-edge research discussed in this special issue of Physics World. The principal difficulty lies in finding the right resource for a particular situation. By combining the efforts of many educators, research groups and outreach specialists each with their own strengths and weaknesses into a single, searchable database, The Quantum Exchange makes this process easier. Its centralized approach is also useful for would-be developers of new resources, who can check it to make sure their cherished projects are not reinventing someone elses wheel.
www.goodfellow.com
Ermine Business Park Huntingdon PE29 6WR UK Tel: 0800 731 4653 or +44 1480 424 800 Fax: 0800 328 7689 or +44 1480 424 900 info@goodfellow.com
70 000 PRODUCTS
SMALL QUANTITIES
FAST DELIVERY
61
An iconoclasts career
Arnero
Ideas man Artists concept of Dyson rings forming a stable Dyson swarm just one of many diverse ideas to come from Freeman Dyson. Maverick Genius: the Pioneering Odyssey of FreemanDyson Phillip Schewe 2013 Thomas Dunne Books 17.49/ $27.99hb 352pp
The maverick genius referred to in the title of Phillip Schewes book is Freeman Dyson: a truly great mathematical physicist, bestselling author, longest-serving member of the US militarys JASON advisory group, and occupant of the fourth chair when the Nobel Prize for Physics was awarded for quantum electrodynamics (QED) among many other distinctions. Indeed, a biography of Dyson was long overdue, even though his own autobiographical writings are extensive and so beautifully written that no ordinary author could match them, Schewe included. Why, in that case, should we bother with this biography? Because, as the author makes clear, there are many Freeman Dysons, and how they developed (evolved?) into each other, and what their relationship is, are both relevant parts of his story as is some kind of appraisal of what one is to make of the final individual. My own contacts with Dyson have been indirect. Of course, I tried to understand the fundamental QED papers of 1949 that revised all our views of quantum field theory, and I used the techniques presented in them to help solve a puzzle in solidstate physics. Then, in 1958 I was chosen as a substitute for Dyson
after he was enticed away from the University of California, Berkeley where he had spent three summers researching condensed-matter problems with Charles Kittel to work at General Atomics in La Jolla, California. There, for much more money than Kittel could command, Dyson helped design the safe reactor TRIGA and the Orion spaceship. (I had a marvellous summer at Berkeley, though my papers were crude compared with Dysons.) But we did not meet until the first energy crisis, when we both attended a workshop on energy that was sponsored by the American Physical Society. Afterwards, we met at disarmament seminars at Princeton University in New Jersey, which is where I first sensed his ambiguity about conventional liberal positions on subjects such as the Star Wars defence initiative most of which I hold unambiguously. This is not an authorized biography, so Schewe did not have access to any private letters in his research. However, he is a well-known popularizer of physics (being employed in that capacity by the American Institute of Physics) and he has done a meticulous job of finding all of the relevant sources available. He has researched the course of Dysons life in detail,
beginning with his privileged and precocious childhood at Winchester and foreshortened Cambridge years, which were overshadowed by the approach of the Second World War. Dyson spent the war years doing operations research for Bomber Command, and his determinedly itinerant graduate years with Hans Bethe and Richard Feynman culminated in the great breakthrough of QED. After his relatively brief, but scientifically fertile, junior faculty years at Birmingham and Cornell, he settled permanently at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) at Princeton in 1953, at the age of 30. Settled, however, is hardly the word for it: the liberal vacations and relaxed leave policies of the IAS have enabled Dyson to become the epitome of the have briefcase, will travel scientist, bringing him several further careers. The one that seemed to leave the strongest impression on him was his involvement with the nuclear world and particularly the Orion project, which foreshadowed major themes of his later career. Orion was a nuclear-powered spaceship that he, Edward Teller and Ted Taylor designed in 1959 and advocated thereafter, and this experience seems to have left him with a visionary predilection for thinking the unthinkable in terms of the long-term future of the human (or other intelligent) race in space. He also became a major influence in the effort to achieve some measure of nuclear disarmament; after initially opposing the test ban treaty, as a JASON consultant he co-wrote an influential report opposing the employment of nuclear weapons in Vietnam. Until the 1980s Dyson kept up a continuous and active career in mathematical physics, with occasional forays into broader interests such as condensed matter, biology (particularly studies on the origins of life) and astronomy. Around that time, he discovered his second mtier as a writer of extraordinarily readable prose. A number of well-received essays were followed by his first autobiographical book, Disturbing the Universe (1979), which was nominated for the US National Book Award. Then came Weapons and Hope (1984), which captured the publics interest in the Reagan administrations Strategic Defense Initiative (the aforementioned Star Wars). He continues to publish a book every few years as well as many articles and book reviews. Partly thanks to his prolific writing, but also because he seems to
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
62
Reviews
have something inspiring and beautifully phrased to say for any occasion, he has become a popular lecturer and maintains a frighteningly full travel schedule. Most recently he has delighted in maintaining minority views on a number of topics such as climate, religion (his Christianity places him in the minority for his profession) and genetic modification. Did he ever have time for a private life? Schewes book records Dysons claim (perhaps a dubious one) to have had two principles in his relations with women: he did not allow himself to become interested if he didnt have marriage in mind; and he intended to have six children. He proposed to his first wife, Verena a bright, glamorous mathematician and single mother at the IAS almost on meeting her, and wooed her by mail for over a year throughout his continual travels until (with some reluctance on her part) they married in 1950. She bore him two children before a miscarriage, but theirs was a somewhat stormy marriage, noteworthy for the fact that her thesis and mathematical notes were deliberately burned in the interest of domesticity. Both children, Esther and George, became well-known figures, she as a journalist-entrepreneur and he as an author. Dysons second wife Imme, formerly his childrens au pair, produced four more daughters. Friends of his children report that Dyson is a kindly, avuncular figure, though a rather strict father. A more important question, though, is whether Dyson is the important world figure that Schewe makes him out to be. In his career, we can see traces of the mathematical physicists reluctance to tackle the ambiguous or deeply puzzling question, or to go out mathematically even a little bit on a limb something that contrasts sharply with his joyful interest in bizarre futurology. Perhaps this is the source of Dysons dreadful misjudgment on the climate question: he sees that the possible errors are large, but does not factor in that they are likely to be large in the wrong direction, and does not credit obvious qualitative arguments from simple laws of physics. One could wish, as in many biographies of scientists, that the scientific contributions were more critically presented and contextualized. Sometimes the hype goes too far, as when Schewe compares Dysons popularity as the guru of QED in the 1950s with the Beatles conquest of America in the 1960s. Dysons very elegant arguments do not always have much to say about how things work in the real world, and the author makes little effort to distinguish whether they do. He did not, for one thing, participate in any of the revolutionary events that created the Standard Model. However, my own preference is for the sloppy and practical rather than elegant and precise, so I am prejudiced. It is natural for biographers to fall a little in love with their subjects, but on balance, this book leaves the reader intrigued but a bit unsatisfied. Dyson is a superbly able man and has done so much, but what if he had focused on one career? Perhaps the career he really wanted was scotched, as Schewe suggests, by the fallout problems of Orion? In any case, he is worth reading about and marvelling at.
Philip Anderson is a condensed-matter physicist at Princeton University in the US who has dabbled in complexity theory, astrophysics and even particle theory, e-mail pwa@princeton.edu
Untitled-1 1
15/02/2013 09:19
63
Reviews
On beyond zero
Hidden message The cover of The Universe in Zero Words cleverly hides equations in the Milky Way.
The Universe in Zero Words sounds like the title of a coffee-table book of astronomy photos. The image on its cover a photograph of the Milky Way does little to suggest otherwise. But the book Dana Mackenzie has actually written is a very different beast indeed. A closer look at that star-spangled cover reveals a host of equations scattered through the night sky, and inside it is an elegantly illustrated history of mathematical thought, rather than a series of nebula photos. Mackenzies chronicle is impressive in its scope, running all the way from 1+1=2 (an expression with some surprisingly interesting properties) through to 20th-century revelations such as Lorenzs equations of chaos theory and the realization that some infinities are bigger than others. Understandably, Mackenzie, a mathematicianturned-writer, uses rather more than zero words to describe these discoveries: the book is divided into 24 semi-independent essays, each nominally based on a single equation or group of equations. Most of these expressions will be familiar to physicists, but there are also a few oddities, such as the ChernGaussBonnet equation, and even old favourites such as Maxwells equations are often presented with a fresh twist. This tendency is apparent from the first few essays, which frequently give credit to ancient mathematicians who lived outside the GrecoRoman world of Euclid and Archimedes. In particular, an account of Liu Hui, a Chinese mathematician and commentator from the third century AD, enlivens the essay on the Pythagorean theorem which, as Mackenzie makes clear, was not Pythagoras invention, having been known to the Babylonians for more than a millennium before Pythagoras started teaching in the 6th century BC. This cross-cultural focus is particularly appropriate given the books title, which refers to the Platonist idea that numbers and equations express truths about the universe that are independent of words, language or culture. What was that old proverb about books and covers, again? 2012 Princeton University Press 19.95/$27.95hb 224pp
Proof positive
Prove that a parallelogram with equal diagonals must be a rectangle. Show that the surface area of a sphere is exactly two-thirds that of its (closed) cylinder. Derive the equation for a hyperbola. If these instructions induce puzzlement, a vague sense of I used to know how to do that or even a barely suppressed twinge of panic, then Measurement deserves a place on your shelf. Written by Paul Lockhart, a New York-based mathematics teacher and education advocate, the book aims not only to teach mathematics, but also to instil in readers a genuine appreciation for the subject and an understanding of why it is beautiful and worth learning. In his introduction, Lockhart admits that this will not be an easy process; mathematics, he writes, is like a jungle, and the jungle does not give up its secrets easilyI dont know of any human activity as demanding of ones imagination, intuition and ingenuity. On the other hand, mathematics is also full of enchanting mysteries, many of which are accessible even to novices provided they are willing to play around with ideas and also develop a high tolerance for getting stuck. To help readers build their mathematical muscles, Lockhart has peppered his book with questions and puzzles like the ones that opened this review. The solutions to some of them are worked out (or at least worked around) in the text, but most are left as an exercise for the reader, without further comment or explanation from Lockhart. In a formal textbook, such an approach would be frustrating especially for students with problem sets due every week, who seldom have the luxury of letting it take hours or even days for a new idea to sink in, as Lockhart advises. In the more relaxed and playful context of Measurement, however, it seems to work, and readers who try some of the easier puzzles will soon find themselves ready for more challenging fare. And if you do get stuck, Lockhart advises you to start working on another problem, as its much better to have five or six walls to bang your head against than only one. 2012 Harvard University Press 20.00/$29.95hb 416pp
Albert Einsteins early career as a clerk in the Swiss Patent Office is sometimes perceived as an aberration. Having failed to get a job as a teacher, or to have his true talents properly appreciated by the physics establishment, the story goes that he took this rather boring job only because he needed to eat, or because it allowed him time to construct a gedankenexperiment or two in periods of idleness. There is some truth to this: although Einstein later looked back on the patent office with fondness (calling it that worldly cloister where I concocted my finest ideas) he left his job there as soon as he reasonably could, after obtaining an academic post at the University of Zurich. Yet Einsteins experiences of the patent office never really left him. Even after his theoretical work made him the worlds most famous scientist, he maintained an avid interest in technology and practical inventions. These inventions along with his musings and expert opinions on other peoples gadgets are the subject of The Practical Einstein: Experiments, Patents, Inventions by Jzsef Illy, a visiting historian at the California Institute of Technology. In this slender book readers will find some fascinating anecdotes about Einsteins lesser-known scientific results, including a refrigerator he invented with Le Szilrd and a paper he wrote on the meanderings of rivers. Not all of these efforts were successful. For example, an experiment he conducted on molecular currents in 1915 produced a result that, in Illys understated words, did not stand the test of time. Similarly, Einsteins career as an impartial witness for patent disputes which began after he had moved into academia was marked by a number of lost cases and bungled court appearances. Even the successful and innovative EinsteinSzilrd refrigerators were preceded by Einsteins abortive efforts to develop an ice machine with his chemist colleague Walther Nernst. The Practical Einstein reads more like a series of stories than a narrative, but Illy does deserve credit for gathering the often incomplete records of Einsteins practical side into one book. 2012 Johns Hopkins University Press 31.50/$60.00hb 216pp
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
64
PERFORMANCE
Scan the QR code with your smartphone for more information Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2013
GEnERaL MaTERiaLS and METhodS HH Functional Surfaces/Interfaces for Controlling Wetting and Adhesion
II JJ KK LL NN Bulk Metallic Glasses Materials Fundamentals of Fatigue and Fracture Dislocation Plasticity Advances in Scanning Probe Microscopy Strategies and Techniques to Accelerate Inorganic Materials Innovation Solid-State Chemistry of Inorganic Materials
ELECTRoniCS and PhoToniCS L Photonic and Plasmonic Materials for Enhanced Optoelectronic Performance
M N O P Q R S T U V Large-Area Processing and Patterning for Active Optical and Electronic Devices Functional Aspects of Luminescent and Photoactive Organic and Soft Materials Solution Processing of Inorganic and Hybrid Materials for Electronics and Photonics Emergent Electron Transport Properties at Complex Oxide Interfaces Organic MicrolasersFrom Fundamentals to Device Application Oxide Semiconductors Diamond Electronics and Biotechnology Fundamentals to Applications VII Compound Semiconductor Materials and Devices Magnetic Nanostructures and Spin-Electron-Lattice Phenomena in Functional Materials Enabling MetamaterialsFrom Science to Innovation
nanoMaTERiaLS RR Large-Area Graphene and Other 2D-Layered Materials Synthesis, Properties and Applications
SS TT UU VV Nanowires and Nanotubes Novel Materials, Advanced Heterostructures, Doping and Devices Transport Properties in Nanocomposites Phonon-Interaction-Based Materials Design Theory, Experiments and Applications Designed Cellular Materials Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Applications Microelectromechanical SystemsMaterials and Devices Elastic Strain Engineering for Unprecedented Materials Properties Nanostructured Materials in Extreme Environments
www.mrs.org/fall2013
2013 MRS Fall Meeting ChaiRS
Charles T. Black Brookhaven National Laboratory Elisabetta Comini Universit di Brescia Gitti Frey TechnionIsrael Institute of Technology Kristi L. Kiick University of Delaware Loucas Tsakalakos General ElectricGlobal Research Center
506 Keystone Drive Warrendale, PA 15086-7573 Tel 724.779.3003 Fax 724.779.8313 info@mrs.org www.mrs.org
GraduateCareers
March 2013
Soft landings
The skills you didnt know you had
Shutterstock/iurii
GraduateCareers
One aspect of finding information is, of course, having good formal research skills. During your degree, you were probably taught how to carry out simple open-ended experiments, use the library and mine various databases for information. However, many of the research skills you will find most useful in your future career are those you picked up almost without realizing it. One of these, Barham suggests, is simply being able to find the right person to talk to. When setting assignments, we try and set questions that cannot be answered by doing a Google search, he says. We encourage students to knock on doors and ask for
advice. We also encourage them to talk to students in higher years as part of our parenting system. Being able to glean information from people is a particularly important skill for journalists. Valerie Jamieson, who is now features editor at New Scientist magazine, chose to study physics at the University of Glasgow because she felt it would give her skills in many areas. Today, she uses research skills she learned during her undergraduate degree and her PhD to help her find out the very human stories behind scientific results. Another important and related skill, Jamieson says, is being able to analyse the information once she uncovers it. In my job, I see a lot of press releases, and sometimes press releases can overblow the significance of results, which can go on to get reported, she explains. Understanding the scientific method, how results get presented and what uncertainties mean really helps me to decide whether a story really is as significant as it is cracked up to be. It makes you better informed. Research skills of this type are valued in the commercial world, too. For example, companies looking to hire new employees
may look favourably on applicants with strong research skills even if research as such is not part of the job description because they tend to require less time and money to train, and will use their own initiative to start providing new ideas quickly. Graduates who have good research skills are also likely to be able to improve products and services quickly. For example, project-based work may require research skills to get a project off the ground.
Many of the skills you will find most useful you picked up almost without realizing it
68
In the finance industry, skills such as analytical thinking and problem solving are always useful. When William Van De Pette graduated from the University of Oxford, he knew he did not want to work in physics, but he wanted a job where he could apply the skills he had learned during his physics degree. Today he is a portfolio manager at investment management group Henderson Global Investors in London. During my degree I gained skills in research, analytical thinking and problem solving, and these are now skills I use every day in my job, Van De Pette told Physics World. I often have to take maths problems and translate them into real-world solutions. For this I use problem solving strategies I learned during my undergraduate years. I also frequently have to find information by talking to people, by e-mail and by reading reports, and then make investment decisions based on what I find out. A generalized ability to find things out
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
GraduateCareers
is one of several so-called soft skills that students pick up during a physics degree without understanding their importance to employers, or even fully realizing that they are acquiring them at all. Two other such skills giving presentations and accepting criticism are explored later in this special graduate careers section, but this is far from an exhaustive list; team working, report writing, networking (see February pp44 45) and many others are also important.
To establish what skills you have used, and how and when you have used them, the careers manager of the Institute of Physics, Lindsey Farquharson, recommends that students undertake a skills audit. Using a resource produced by the Institute (The physicists guide to getting the most from a physics degree), students can establish what skills they have gained from their degree and whether they have evidence or examples to demonstrate their
mastery to potential employers. By the end of the exercise, she says, they should be able to see which areas they need to work on, and which are well supported with numerous examples. Being able to demonstrate competence in these areas, she adds, could be the deciding factor between you and another candidate with the same degree.
Nadya Anscombe is a freelance writer based in Bristol, UK, e-mail mail@nadya-anscombe.com
of a regularly scheduled meeting with your expect employees to pick up on veiled clues. supervisor or line manager, it is probably If a complaint has been made, managers a lower-grade issue, but it should still be may want or need to preserve anonymity. taken seriously. As a consequence, new or relatively junior employees may feel they have to accept at face value whatever criticism is directed Learning lessons Regardless of the setting or their aca- at them, says Simon Broomer, managdemic background, though, many gradu- ing director of the career-planning firm ates are surprised to find that the criticism CareerBalance. That, however, would be a they receive at work is far less direct or mistake, Coles argues, because employees detailed and far more diplomatic than need details in order to respond effectively the feedback they have grown accustomed to criticism. Despite having just received to receiving in full-time education. Coles some bad news and although you are probsays that to some extent, this is just a part ably angry and in denial, you really do need of British culture. We dont like confron- to appreciate the value of what you are being tation and dont like embarrassment, he told, he says. Treat feedback as a gift. In order to do this, Broomer suggests says. We tend to avoid the truth. We might that employees should make a clear plan for also attempt to dilute the feedback. Not all the differences are cultural, how- digesting criticism and turning the situaever. The bald truth is that new recruits are tion around. First of all, he says, you should often small cogs in a big machine, and man- show a positive attitude. Try to avoid being agers may not feel they have much invested defensive, criticising or blaming others, he in a new employees success or failures. It is says. Stay positive, demonstrating that you therefore possible that they will not bother take the feedback seriously and are keen to to go into painstaking detail, and will improve where you can.
69
GraduateCareers
Dishing it out
the other foot, and you will be called upon to give criticism to others. At that point, the experience of receiving and acting on criticism will hopefully help you to do it well. Constructive and appropriate feedback is an art in itself, and one that is often in short supply in todays corporate environment. According to Coles, the key is to be open and honest, but above all, constructive, and provide accurate feedback and pinpoint strengths as well as weaknesses. This advice is also valid when the person you are criticizing is yourself. Peter Wilford, career coach at Gateway Career Management, is adamant about the need for regular self-assessment. Ask yourself, How am I progressing? What do I need to do to reach the next level?. If you set personal and work goals and review them regularly, Wilford says, this type of selfcriticism will help you take control of your career. After all, he concludes, It is up to you and no-one else to drive it forward.
Once you are on your way up the ladder of Giles Morris is a freelance writer based in London, promotion, of course, the boot will be on e-mail giles@gilesmorris.co.uk
Medal-winning presentations
Sharon Ann Holgate examines how lessons from sports psychology can help physics graduates win over their audiences when it matters
From announcing research results at conferences, to pitching for investment and showcasing project plans to bosses or clients, most careers involve giving presentations. Presentations can also be integral to job interviews, may count towards your degree grade and are the backbone of many science outreach activities. So whether you enjoy the experience or it fills you with dread, it is crucial to learn how to deliver the very best presentations you can in important, and often nervewracking, situations. Sportspeople, too, need to perform at their best when it counts no matter how they are feeling, who they are competing against or what internal and external pressures they are facing. Indeed, an entire discipline sports psychology has been developed to help sportspeople deal with these stresses, and workers in many professions have adapted aspects of these techniques to enhance their own performance. Might sports psychologists have something to offer to physics students, who need to deliver effective presentations both now and in their future careers?
iStockphoto/Goldmund Lukic
Practice is one of the most common pieces of advice given to people preparing presentations. However, there is much more you can do to prepare than simply running through the material over and overagain. Richard Keegan, a sports psychologist at Australias University of Canberra, suggests that students should build up, like an athlete would, from small manageable challenges to full rehearsals. He recommends rehearsing a presentation first in private, then in front of friends or relatives,
and finally asking a peer group to provide a more critical audience. Try to keep any criticism or mistakes whether in rehearsal or the final presentation in perspective, Keegan stresses. After all, he adds, errors are not going to result in your friends and family no longer loving you. While practising, Keegan also suggests that students should think through worstcase scenarios and come up with a plan to deal with them. Kevin Sheridan, a postdoc at the University of Sussex and one of three UK physicists who agreed to try out the tips presented in this article, found
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
70
GraduateCareers
that this advice helped him handle being PET TLEP Seven steps to imagining successful talks interrupted with questions while delivering a presentation to his research group. Physical. Make your imagery multi-sensory, imagining how you will feel and move during your Because I had mentally rehearsed these presentation, as well as thinking through the content. sorts of situations, I was able to explain Environment. Make what you imagine, and where you do your imagining, as similar as possible to the what I was trying to say without panic or presentation location. fear, says Sheridan. Task. Rather than imagining something metaphorical such as pushing a rock up a hill, imagine the Sports psychologist Dave Smith, a sen- tasks required to give your presentation. ior lecturer in exercise and sport science T iming. Imagine delivering your presentation in real time to give an accurate sense of when you need at Manchester Metropolitan University to carry out each task. (MMU), recommends that students try to Learning. Continually update your imagery to accommodate anything you learn, concentrating in turn think positively, both while practising and on different aspects of delivering your presentation. during the actual presentation. Sports psy- Emotion. Imagine the associated emotions positively so they worry you less. For example, chologists try to train golfers and snooker vividly imagine being nervous, then imagine remaining calm and focused and giving a really players to think positively after they mess goodpresentation. up a shot, he explains. If the player chas- Perspective. To picture both perspectives, try imagining giving your talk and also being in the tises themselves, they are likely to miss the audience watching yourself. next shot, too. If something goes wrong during a presentation, he adds, it is important to avoid panicking because if you do, necessarily helpful for giving academic and stressed. your chances of being able to sort the situ- presentations because the venue, audience But what if nerves do strike during your responsiveness and equipment functional- presentation? A classic trick is to imagine ation out become much less. ity are oftenunknown. the anxiety is a liquid that can drain out One way around this barrier is to visit a from your body through taps in your finI think, therefore I can Smith also advocates building confidence venue in advance or find pictures of it. That gers and toes. Or think about a calming, by imagining forthcoming presentations is part of the approach advocated by Dave happy place like a beach, advises Keegan. using an adapted form of the PETTLEP Collins, who leads the Institute of Coach- If you find your heart is racing while you system (see box). This system was devel- ing and Performance at the University of speak, just pause for a moment and take a oped by some of his colleagues at MMU Central Lancashire and is a former perfor- deep breath while you look at a slide or take to provide sportspeople with a structured mance director of UK Athletics. Collins a sip of water. Another way to build confidence and way of using their imagination to motivate advises planning travel to the venue well them, improve performance, and increase ahead of time, and even trying out the jour- effectiveness, Keegan believes, is to make their confidence. There is a lot of evidence ney from hotel to venue if you are staying sure you get a good start by summarizing that some of the same neural pathways in nearby. He also recommends printing back- your presentation in a couple of sentences the brain that are used when you do some- up copies of presentation slides on acetate at the beginning. Make it so clear you thing are also activated when you imagine overheads and saving slides on a memory could sell it to someone you meet in an elevator, he urges. The rest of the talks doing it. So it can help prime you for that stick to allow for equipment failures. structure is also important. Collins sugactivity, says Smith. gests removing any topics that are so comNatalie Whitehead, a second-year phys- Combating nerves ics undergraduate at the University of Exe- On the day of the talk, Collins suggests plex you will not have time to explain them ter, found that visualizing herself speaking that speakers try to distract themselves by properly, and making sure the information in the venue helped her present her first doing something unrelated an hour and a flows in a logical fashion. Ed Copeland, a University of Nottingham outreach talk, which she gave to 15- and half before the presentation starts. Then, at 16-year-old pupils in a local school. It gives least 20minutes before speaking, he recom- physicist who regularly gives outreach talks you a feeling for how it might turn out, so mends setting up and checking your slides. in schools and to the general public, agrees youre more prepared and more confident, When it is finally your turn to talk, he says, that delivering a take-home message is she says. When she worked in an engineer- think about the first few words or lines you important. Sheridan, however, found that ing consultancy before her degree, White- are going to say. This should kick-start you while this advice greatly improved an outhead adds, she would have found this and into your talk. Accepting that you may get reach talk he gave for school pupils, it did other advice in this article invaluable. You nervous can also help you deliver a good not work so well in a research presentation. didnt have much guidance, she explains. presentation. According to Collins, the Colleagues want an argument built up You were just sent into client meetings and key is to say Okay, Im put out by this, but its block by block with rigour, he explains. However well you mentally and physihad to present your results. no worry because I know Ive done everyHowever, Pete Vukusic, a physicist at thing I possibly can to perform at my best. cally prepare, no presentation ever goes Exeter who gave the Institute of Physics Charlotte Brand, a final-year student at perfectly. So Collins emphasizes the Schools Lecture Tour in 2007, is more Exeter who regularly gives outreach talks, importance of making notes on what went sceptical. Vukusic also played basket- likes this approach. Its really helpful to well, and what aspects you can learn from ball at international level for the England have someone say its okay to be nervous, and work on for next time. And for anyone under-15, under-17 and under-19 squads, she says. I think a lot of people find it very who feels they are just no good at puband while he agrees that visualization is hard to accept they are going to be nerv- lic speaking, Smith has one final piece of essential for sport, in his view it is not ous, and that makes them more nervous advice: persevere. Practising in front of smaller audiences, and imagery, will help you improve your ability to give presentations, he says.
Accepting that you may get nervous can help you deliver a good presentation
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
Sharon Ann Holgate (www.sharonannholgate.com) is a freelance science writer and broadcaster with a DPhil in physics
71
physicsworld.com
GraduateRecruitment
School of
www.brightrecruits.com
Find all the best graduate jobs, studentships and courses here in Physics World and online at brightrecruits.com
l l
l l
Awardwinning Placement and Careers Centre Brunel is conveniently located 20 minutes from London Heathrow Airport by car
2012
l l
l l
l l l
l l
Advanced Electronic and Electrical Engineering MSc full-time Advanced Engineering Design MSc full-time and part-time Advanced Manufacturing Systems MSc full-time and distance learning Advanced Mechanical Engineering MSc full-time Advanced Multimedia Design and 3D Technologies MSc full-time and part-time Aerospace Engineering MSc full-time Automotive and Motorsport Engineering MSc full-time Biomedical Engineering MSc full-time Building Services Engineering MSc full-time and distance learning Building Services Engineering Management MSc distance learning Building Services Engineering with Sustainable Energy MSc full-time and distance learning Computer Communication Networks MSc full-time Design and Branding Strategy/Strategy and Innovation MA full-time Embedded Systems MSc Multimedia Communications / Signal Processing full-time Engineering Management MSc full-time and distance learning Integrated Product Design MSc full-time Packaging Technology Management MSc full-time and distance learning Project and Infrastructure Management MSc full-time Renewable Energy Systems MSc full-time Sustainable Electrical Power MSc full-time and part-time Sustainable Energy: Technologies and Management MSc full-time Water Enginerring MSc full-time Wireless Communication Systems MSc full-time
Subject to approval:
l l
Digital Design and Branding MSc full-time Structural Integrity MSc full-time
www.brunel.ac.uk
72
2013
Teacher Training
ScholarShipS
www.iop.org/scholarships
17/09/2012 11:05
www.engd.hw.ac.uk
Physics World March 2013
73
BSc (min. 2:1), MSc or PhD in science, mathematics or engineering Programming experience in at least one of our core languages: Java, C#, C++, C, VB, .NET or Python
www.tessella.com/careers
http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/energy http://lolo.ac.uk
Work alongside experienced researchers in a dynamic, multidisciplinary environment and become one of the energy pioneers of tomorrow. Applications welcome from candiates with a good first degree in a range of subjects (e.g. Economics, Physical Sciences, Engineering, Mathematics). A background in energy is not required.
The MSc in Biophysical Sciences has been created to bring excellent physical science graduates to a position where they can start with confidence in a wide range of careers in the biophysical sciences. Created in response to the growing demand for graduates who can apply their knowledge outside of the traditional boundaries of their discipline, this course provides the essential tools and skills to excel in multidisciplinary research. www.durham.ac.uk/bsi/postgraduates Closing date 1st July 2013
Image courtesy of Prof. R. Quinlan, Durham University
6 fully-funded four year (MRes + PhD) studentships in Energy Demand are also available
as part of the London-Loughborough Centre for doctoral research in energy demand. See website for eligilibity.
74
PhD studentships
Fusion Energy: Materials and Plasma Scientists
The Universities of Durham, Liverpool, Manchester, Oxford and York, with Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, the Central Laser Facility and AWE have formed the Fusion Doctoral Training Network: an EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training. With ITER under construction and the operation of NIF in the US, fusion energy is entering an exciting new era. We work with world-leading facilities, including JET, MAST and the Central Laser Facility, while our Low Temperature Plasma research is linked with major international companies in areas such as semiconductor processing. Our PhD programme offers: - fully funded 3 and 4-year research studentships - a training programme in fusion energy, covering materials and plasma science - exciting research projects, linked to world-leading fusion facilities - materials and plasma research projects for fusion energy - plasma projects in high energy density physics and laboratory astrophysics - opportunities for international collaboration and travel
For more information on the projects and application procedure visit
www.york.ac.uk/physics/fusion-dtn
www.orc.southampton.ac.uk/visitus.html
ACRITAS
ACRITAS (Actuation and Characterisation at the Single Bond Limit) is a Marie Curie Initial Training Network whose primary focus is advanced training and research in scanning probe-based nanoscience at the single bond limit. ACRITAS runs for four years from Oct. 2012, involves eleven core partners and thirteen associate partners spanning academia, industry, professional bodies, and NGOs. Research Fields Physics - Surface physics Chemistry - Physical chemistry Eligibility criteria Candidates must be in the first 4 years of their research careers and have not been awarded a doctorate degree. Preference will be given to candidates with a first degree in Physics or Chemistry. (If the degree is in Chemistry there should be a strong background in physical chemistry). As part of our commitment to promoting diversity we encourage applications from women. All studentships are subject to the Marie Curie mobility and eligibility criteria described at http://ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/ . The fellowship will entail secondments to at least one core and one associate network partner. See http://www.acritas.eu for a list of all ACRITAS partners.
Vacancies
Eight early stage researcher positions are now available within the ACRITAS network and we invite suitably qualified candidates to apply. Note that all appointees will be expected to register for a PhD, must hold a primary degree of an appropriate standard in a relevant subject (e.g. Physics, Chemistry, Materials Science please contact the lead partner for the PhD project in which youre interested for advice), and must meet the Marie Curie mobility regulations.
75
If you are graduating this year then your IOP membership will lapse after you graduate.
Choose from three options:
physicists (including postgraduate students) wanting to maintain their professional membership. perfect for anyone with an interest in physics. continuing your undergraduate studies please let us know so we can extend your free membership.
Regrading is easy!
All you need to do is go to www.myiop.org, log in and then follow the instructions. Unless we hear from you by 30 September 2013 your current student membership will expire in October 2013.
Department of Physics
The University of York is the number 1 UK university in the world ranking of universities under 50 years old. The Department of Physics is growing vigorously, with an investment package during the last five years of 25 new academic posts, plus major new laboratories and facilities including the York-JEOL Nanocentre, the York Institute for Materials Research, the York Plasma Institute and Astrocampus. In addition to a dynamic and internationally renown research environment, we offer an active programme of post-graduate training including skills and professional development, and an attractive campus environment 2 km from the centre of one of the most beautiful cities in the world.
Postgraduate opportunities
Research in the Department of Physics at the University of York spans a wide range of exciting fields in fundamental, cross-disciplinary and applied physics. Our internationally recognised research is organised into three groups with strong ties to industry: n Condensed Matter Physics: nano and low-dimensional systems, magnetism and spintronics, quantum theory and applications & biophysics and organic systems n Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Astrophysics n Laser-Plasma Physics, Low Temperature Plasmas and Fusion energy We offer PhD and MSc research degrees, as well as a 4-year PhD in the Fusion Doctoral Training Network, a one-year taught MSc in Fusion Energy and a nine-month Graduate Diploma in Physics. PhD studentships are currently available with funding from the EPSRC/ STFC, the Fusion DTN, industry sponsorship or The University of York. Some funding is also available for the MSc in Fusion Energy. For more information visit www.york.ac.uk/physics/postgraduate or email the Graduate Admissions Tutor, Dr Yvette Hancock (y.hancock@york.ac.uk)
l l
http://www.ph.bham.ac.uk/prospective/postgrad/pgptnr.htm One year taught postgrad MSc. Next year starts 30/09/2013. Course structure refined over the 50 years the MSc has run.
Fully integrated labs and tutorials every week to bring together the wide range of subjects and provide practical and written examples and guidance in person. Study courses on Reactor Systems, Reactor Physics and Kinetics, Radiation Transport, Thermal Hydraulics, Reactor Materials and more. PhD programs also possible.
Summer project, usually taken in industry and in many cases has led to employment. Sponsored by all the major players in the nuclear industry.
76
CAREER VIDEOS
Presented by
Visit brightrecruits.com/videos
An Ecolab Company
Are you open to a great and unexpected career move? Top Engineers events connectsengineering graduates and professionals (in chemical, electrical, industrial, manufacturing, mechanical, software engineering,...) with leading global companies looking to tackle tomorrows world challenges. Join us online through exclusive presentations and/or at one of our summits in Brussels or Berlin for two days of interviews and workshops with international recruiters. Help shape tomorrows business. By invitation only, so apply now. Free accommodation at the summits if you are invited.
LIFE IS A JOURNEY. START YOURS ON WWW.CAREERSINTERNATIONAL.COM
1/15/2013 12:06:03 PM
77
Erasmus Mundus
l l
ASSOCIATED RESEARCH PARTNERS: IMEC, Leuven, Belgium CEA-LETI, Grenoble, France Leibniz Institute for Solid-State and Materials Research, Dresden, Germany
Prof. Guido Groeseneken (K.U.Leuven), Co-ordinator Erasmus Mundus Master of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
nano@kuleuven.be www.emm-nano.org
Visit
Positions available at
University of Leeds UK INESC-MN Portugal IBM Research Zurich Switzerland International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory Portugal University of Cambridge UK Hitachi Cambridge Laboratory UK University Regensburg Germany Delft University of Technology Netherlands Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway
Key benefits
Generous salary and additional allowances to cover living costs and travel, including a contribution to some family related expenses and the cost of annual travel back to home country. Opportunities for international collaboration and travel to world class academic and industrial partners. Training in a range of state-of-the-art scientific skills, intellectual property and project management skills. Secondment placements within the networks industrial partners. Funds to support their participation in the SpinIcur ITN European wide research and training events.
How to apply
Shortlisting and interviews from April 2013 and posts available to commence soon after, so early applications are encouraged. Further information concerning the positions and projects, together with the full application procedure, is available at:
www.spinicur.org
If you have the above qualifications, intellect and passion, please apply at www.e2v.com
Image courtesy of NASA
79
Graduates!
www.brightrecruits.com/register
October 2013
GraduateCareers
Physics World March 2013
physicsworld.com
Recruitment
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS
Recruitment Advertising Physics World IOP Publishing Temple Circus, Temple Way Bristol BS1 6HG
Tel +44 (0)117 930 1264 Fax +44 (0)117 930 1178 E-mail sales.physicsworld@iop.org
www.brightrecruits.com
The place for physicists and engineers to find Jobs, Studentships, Courses, Calls for Proposals and Announcements
The Diamond synchrotron light source is the largest scientific facility to be built in the UK for over thirty years. The facility consists of three particle accelerators which provide high brightness photon beams to experimental stations. Diamond is now operational with an initial complement of 20 experimental stations and a further 12 in design and construction. If you are a capable software engineer this is an opportunity to participate in cutting edge research, developing software in an exciting scientific facility. The working environment is technically driven, full of motivated individuals applying software technology to a wide range of technical problems.
Software Engineer
Salary: Competitive
Ref: DIA0808/SB
In this role, you will work closely with a team of scientists and engineers, to develop software to control the Diamond accelerators. This will involve software design, development and support of a suite a client side tools realised in C++, Python and Java. Candidates must have a good honours degree in physics, mathematics or computer science; experience of software engineering, and excellent programming skills in object orientated languages; and a good understanding of mathematics and physics.
Ref: DIA0800/SB
www.york.ac.uk
In this role, you will work closely with a team of scientists and engineers, to develop control systems on the Diamond photon beamlines, and experiment stations. This will involve system design, software development and hands on commissioning of state of the art experimental facilities. Candidates must have a good honours degree in physics, electronic engineering or computer science; experience of software engineering applied to real-time applications and excellent programming skills in C and or object orientated languages. Diamond is committed to equality of opportunities for all, and offer a competitive salary (dependent upon skills, qualifications and experience), comprehensive benefits, an index-linked pension scheme and flexible working hours. For an application form and further information including work permit and visa requirements for non-EU nationals please visit our website at www.diamond.ac.uk telephone our recruitment line on 01235 778218 or write to us at the address below, quoting the appropriate reference number. For further information about this role please visit: www.diamond.ac.uk Closing date: 17th March 2013.
The Physics Department at Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, is seeking to fill a position in theoretical physics for a faculty member. We are looking for applicants with a strong theoretical background and with a wide range of research interests in the areas of Statistical Physics, Many-Body Physics, Quantum Field Theory, and Quantum Information Theory. A Ph.D. degree and commitment to excellence in independent research and teaching is required. Postdoctoral experience is preferred. Interested applicants should send a curriculum vitae, a description of research and teaching interests, and arrange to have three recommendation letters sent to: Carlos vila, e-mail: director-fisica@uniandes.edu.co Chairman, Physics Department, Universidad de los Andes A.A. 4976, Bogot, Colombia. Phone (57-1)-332-4500, Fax (57-1)-332-4516. First review date: March 30th, 2013. Position will remain open until filled. Position starting date: August 2013 or January 2014
www.diamond.ac.uk
Diamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE
81
www.lancaster.ac.uk/jobs
At the Institute of Physics, we recognise the importance of identifying and developing top talent, and that graduates with practical work experience present a much more attractive proposition to your business. Through our Top 40 placements scheme, we are offering to fund talented students on an eight-week summer placement with your organisation, so that you can connect with the cream of penultimate-year undergraduate physics students. By taking part in this scheme you can bring new skills and a fresh perspective to your business, gain a skilled and motivated member of staff and ultimately drive productivity. For more details about the IOP Top 40, please visit www.iop.org/careers/top40placements or contact Lindsey Farquharson at summerplacements@iop.org
82
Physics World
March 2013
CERN Courier
S e p t e m b e r 2 0 12
The Institute for Basic Science (IBS) was established by the Korean government in November 2011 with the goal to create a world-class research institute in the basic sciences. IBS/RISP is to develop scientific and technical expertise and capabilities for the construction of a rare isotope accelerator complex (Rare Isotope Science Project, RISP) for nuclear physics, and medical and material science and applications. The IBS/RISP is seeking for qualified applicants to work for Rare Isotope Science Project (RISP) at its headquarters office in Daejeon, Republic of Korea. The positions are at the level of research fellow, and postdoctoral research associates and accelerator engineers. Persons with high-level research achievement, extensive experience in large scale accelerator facility construction are given higher priority. The starting date is as soon as possible.
n Tr y something
JoB
extraordinary
ew.
opportunities
Unique opportunity to be involved in defining and implementing the state-of-the-art laser technology and construction of a new EU science facility.
www.eli-beams.eu/cooperation/jobs/
SEIZE THE CHANCE XFEL The successful candidates will participate in the R&D and construction of accelerator systems RISP.that is currently European XFEL is a is a multi-national non-profitfor company
European
building an X-ray free-electron laser facility that will open up new areas of scientific research. When this facility isand completed in 2015, its ultrashort If you have the appropriate skills are looking for X-ray flashes and unique research opportunities will attract scientists from all a diverse and interesting employment opportunity over the world to conduct ground-breaking experiments. We are a rapidly we encourage you to apply. IBS/RISP is an equal growing team made of people from more than 20 countries. Join us now!
opportunity employer; all applicants will be considered EXCITING OPPORTUNITIES on their merit. Salary and benefits will be decided upon negotiations with the of RISP and will Find out more about our exciting Director opportunities for scientists, engineers and graduate Help develop X-ray instrumentation becomestudents. effective upon signing the contract. and other systems.
Help create a research facility of superlatives that will provide X-rays of unique quality for cutting-edge research in physics, chemistry, the life Please send your application including CV and sciences and materials science.
introduction to
Ms. Y.H. LEE, RISP Directors Office the Institute English is the working language. We offer salary at and benefits similar to those of public service organisations in Germany, a free-of-charge company pension for Basic Science, 70 Yuseong-daero 1689-gil scheme, generous relocation Korea, package and support, international allowance for Yusung-gu, Daejeon, 305-811 non-German candidates hired from abroad, training opportunities etc. or e-mail to leeyh@ibs.re.kr.
Join our network research references sentof tointernational address or e-mail. institutions, programmes and collaborations. Discuss problems and solutions with colleagues from all over Application deadline is August 31, 2012. the world.
www
w
w
to leeyh@ibs.re.kr. Economically and culturally, Hamburg is the centre of Northern Germany. With its long history in trade, Hamburg has always been an outward-looking city Deadline for applications: August and one of Germanys gateways 31 to the world. 2012 Work and live in Hamburg, one of the most beautiful and interesting cities in Europe!
European XFEL GmbH, Albert-Einstein-Ring 19, 22761 Hamburg, Germany Mailing address: Notkestr. 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
http://risp.ibs.re.kr
Physics World March 2013
From software engineers to administrators, from fire fighters to health and safety officers every kind of thinking is welcome here. Take your career somewhere special.
www.xfel.eu
163769c (CERN) A5 Portrait.indd 1 07/11/2011 14:57
83
The existence of a minimum level of attention suggests that it is, in some sense, a quantum substance
time, during seminars and talks. The most impenetrable of these talks always came from American speakers because they were, at the time, wielding the heavy cutting tools at the face of physics research. Consequently, I developed an association between incomprehensibility and accent. This reached a climax when I visited the US, where I always had the feeling that dubious characters hanging out at bus stations and rest stops must somehow be experts in S-matrix theory and the like, travelling from one seminar to the next. Several years later, when I was at CERN, seminars were instead delivered in thick European accents and concepts such as muon punch-through became more of an obstacle when pointed out in a heavy German accent. Nevertheless, I persevered and slowly developed new skills. The incomprehensibility principle cannot be bypassed but even taking into account added difficulties such as the speakers accent or speed of delivery not to mention bad acoustics or poor visual aids it is still possible to optimize ones absorption of information. One way of doing this is to monitor difficult presentations in background mode, paying just enough attention to follow the gist of the argument until a key point is about to be reached. At that moment, a concerted effort can be made to grab a vital piece of information as it whistles past, before it disappears into the obscurity of the intellectual stratosphere. The trick is to do this at just the right time, so that each concentrated effort is not fruitless. Only cross your bridges when you come to them, as the old adage goes. By adopting this technique, I was able to cover frontier meetings on subjects of which I was supremely ignorant, including microprocessors, cosmology and medical imaging, among others. Journalists who find themselves baffled at scientific press conferences would do well to follow my example, for the truth is that there will always be a fresh supply of incomprehensibility in physics. Dont be disappointed!
Gordon Fraser, a former editor of CERN Courier magazine, died in January before this article could be revised. It was completed by staff at Physics World and is published both here and in CERN Courier this month as a tribute.
P hy sic s Wor ldMar ch 2013
84
Models available with liquefaction rates of 15L/Day, Liquees helium supplied by cryostat boil-off, recovery Digital touch screen user interface which includes: Remote Monitoring & Control Digital Level Indicator System Diagnostics Less than 24 hours between start up and liquid
helium production
99 .9
9%
Su
>
Gas Cylinders
Helium Purier
Atmospheric Recovery Bag Helium Recovery Compressor Manifold for cylinder storage Helium Purier Liquid Helium Plant
Cryomech also provides Helium Reliquefiers for use with individual cryostats.
113 Falso Drive, Syracuse, New York, 13211 USA Ph. 315-455-2555 Fax. 315-455-2544 www.cryomech.com cryosales@cryomech.com