Stephen Gombos Final Decision

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

OFFICE OF ADJUDICATIONS

IN THE MATTER OF LICENSE SUSPENSION


DEP ORDER NO.: 99-11256

STEPHEN GOMBOS : APRIL 24, 2009

FINAL DECISION

A hearing was held on April 22, 2009 regarding the request of Mr. Stephen
Gombos to have his hunting privileges in the state of Connecticut restored. The parties in
attendance included Mr. Gombos mad his attorney, Donald Tamis and Capt. Rick Lewis
representing the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and its Enviromnenta!
Conservation Police. Also in attendance were Mr. William Graham and Ms. Cathie
Garfield who spoke on the record pursuant to Regs, Conn. State Agencies §22a-3a-6(t).
Based on the evidence in the record, I find as follows.

Findings of Fact

1. On November 20, 1999, Stephen Gombos fired his rifle while hunting and shot
William Garfield in the chest causing his death. Mr. Gombos fired his rifle carelessly
and before properly identifying his target. (Ex. DEP-1).

2. Mr. Gombos voluntarily relinquished his hunting license and privilege to hunt in
Connecticut on April 12, 2000 pursuant to General Statutes §26-62. (Ex. DEP-4)

3. Mr. Gombos was notified on October 17, 2008 that his hunting privileges were
indefinitely suspended and that the suspension remained in effect. (Ex. DEP-2).

4. Mr. Gombos has not completed a remedia! hunter education course as required by
§26-62 for restoration of his hunting license or privileges. Mr. Gombos was aware that
the firearms safety course he completed on March 3, 2008 did not qualify as a remedial
hunter education course. (Ex. RESP-1; test. 4/22/091, S. Gombos, K. Schneider).

~ The testimony and proceedings in this matter were recorded. No written transcript has been prepared.
The audio recording of this hearing is on file with the Office of Adjudications and is the official record of
this proceeding. (Printed on Recycled Paper)
79 Elm Street ¯ Hartford, CT 06106-5127
www.ct.gov/dep
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Conclusions of Law

Based on these findings of fact and as a matter of law, I cannot restore Mr.
Gombos’s hurtling privileges until he completes a hunter safety education course. "Any
person whose hunting license is under suspension pursuant to this section shall
successfully complete a remedial hunter education course as required under section 26-31
prior to any restoration of his privilege to obtain a hunting license." General Statutes
§26-62. Mr. Gombos has not met this basic requirement for restoration.

The present request for restoration can be rejected solely for the failure to
complete the hunter education course. However, based on the evidence presented and in
accordance with DEP’s recommendation, I conclude that even if Mr. Gombos completes
the required hunter education course, he should not have his hunting license or privilege
to hunt in the State of Connecticut restored. The Commissioner enjoys broad discretion
in deciding whether to suspend someone’s license under §26-62 and likewise whether to
restore someone’s license or privilege to hunt after it has been suspended. Mr. Gombos,
when offered an opportunity at the hearing, was unable to articulate through his own
testimony or through his attorney the reasons why his license or privilege to hunt should
be restored other than the passage of time. This explanation was insufficient and the lack
of mitigating facts in favor of restoration is distinct. Furthermore, Mr. Gombos was not
even prepared for the result he sought as evidenced by his knowing failure to complete
the required hunter education course. Finally, as noted by DEP, Mr. Gombos has
expressed no need for the restoration of his hunting privileges.

The investigative report of the Environmental Conservation Police indicates that


Mr. Gombos acted carelessly in failing to adequately identify his target before
discharging his weapon. Although he did not intentionally cause the death of Mr.
Garfield, the accident was certainly preventable. The surest way to prevent a similar
incident is to continue the indefinite suspension of Mr. Gombos’s privilege to hunt. As it
authorizes the use of a deadly weapon, a license or privilege to hunt in the State of
Connecticut carries significant responsibility. It is clear that this state’s hunting statutes
and regulations are intended to prevent and deter certain reckless and irresponsible
conduct. Where lives are at stake the Commissioner’s discretion must be exercised on
the side of utmost caution. Therefore, I reject Mr. Gombos’s request for restoration of his
hunting license or privileges. His license and privilege to hunt remain indefinitely
suspended.

Kenneth M. Collette, Hearing Officer

Donald H. Tamls, Esq.


Capt. Rick Lewis, Environmental Conservation Police
PARTY LIST

In the matter of Stephen Gombos


(Suspension of Hunting License)
Case No. 99-11256

PARTY REPRESENTED BY

Stephen Gombos Donald H. Tamis, Esq.


292 Amity Road P.O. Box 351
Bethany, CT 06524 Seymour, CT 06483

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Department of Environmental Protection Capt. Rick Lewis


ENCON Police
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06706

You might also like