Project Charter Guide PDF
Project Charter Guide PDF
Project Charter Guide PDF
Table of Contents
Introduction Use of the Project Charter What is a project charter? Why create a project charter? Who is responsible for the project charter? How to create a project charter Tailoring the project charter to specific projects Use of the Project Charter Guide Section 1. Charter Introduction 1.1 Document change control 1.2 Executive summary 1.3 Authorization Section 2. Project Overview 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Project summary Project goals, objectives, and business outcomes Project scope Milestones Deliverables Project cost estimate and sources of funding Dependencies Project risks, assumptions, and constraints
Section 4. Project References Section 5. Glossary and Acronyms Appendix: Roles and Responsibilities Matrix Bibliography
Introduction
This guide explains the steps needed to create a project charter for the delivery of a project. The guide is meant to be used together with a document called the Project Charter Template , and, where relevant, it includes examples to illustrate the content. The first section, titled "Use of the Project Charter," gives background information on the purpose of the charter, who is responsible for creating it, work that should be carried out beforehand in order to prepare the charter, how the charter should be customized, and key sections required at the beginning.
Adapting the project charter to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Project Complexity and Risk Assessment Tool
The project manager is expected to provide a comprehensive overview of the project in the project charter. The following table lists, in the left column, four classes of projects and suggests some areas to consider when developing a project charter, based on the results obtained through a risk assessment. This assessment would be contained in the business case for the project. To help with a risk assessment, a Project Complexity and Risk Assessment Tool is under development.
Sustaining Project
Description
The primary project goal is to sustain service from an existing asset by addressing aging components or deficiencies that limit its ongoing use. It is not a redevelopment. Negligible new capability or functionality added. Business-initiated changes are likely minimal. Scope confined to a single system or asset within a single program; one or few stakeholders.
Risk Considerations
Low to no requirements risk. Business changes are largely cosmetic e.g. a service enhancement or versioning updates. Business processes are essentially unchanged, although technology interfaces may be different minimal retraining is required at the business level. Minimal change management. Risks more likely associated with technology than business. Higher implementation risks in systems with demanding performance or availability (i.e. non-functional) characteristics.
Tactical Project
Description
Usually driven by an immediate business need to deliver an additional capability, often within a limited time frame, or to position an existing asset for anticipated needs by adding capability. Capability added may be functional or non-functional. Scope may involve multiple systems, programs, or organizational entities (departments) but with a clear authority and a simple governance structure.
Risk Considerations
Changes and additions to business processes are required with small- to medium-scale change management. Effect is often localized to a specific segment of the business. Medium to high requirements risk and related risk of scope creep; development risk increases according to portion being redeveloped or added. Technology risk may be high if significant performance or availability (i.e. nonfunctional) enhancements required. Implementation risk medium, ranging to high if underlying technology base replaced.
Evolutionary Project
Description
Major changes and additions to capability, affecting business processes, job content, and service delivery model. Often a combination of business and technology evolution is involved. Some base components are reused to provide a working platform on which to add function. Scope may involve multiple systems, programs, entities, or jurisdictions and may overlap with client and business systems, requiring an appropriate governance structure.
Risk Considerations
High business risk due to significant change management and business process change. The more pervasive the effect of the solut ion across the business, the greater the risk. High requirements risk and related risk of scope creep, hence significant delivery risk. Governance risk proportional to number and diversity of stakeholder interests. Conversion and implementation risks likely to be high, including organizational change.
Transformational Project
Description
Project will change fundamentals about the way the business area works, such as processes, job content, organization, outsourcing, client and business involvement, and service model. Few if any existing components will be reused. Project likely spans organizational entities; may be multi-jurisdictional, involve multiple stakeholders, and require a complex governance structure.
Risk Considerations
Carries all the risks of the Evolutionary class of projects, further increased by the absence of any significant reuse. High to very high business risk due to project size; very high change management implications; and pervasive effect of change across the business. High to very high governance risk. High conversion and implementation risk, variable technology risk. Few if any risk mitigators are visible.
Section 3. Project Organization 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Project governance Project team structure Roles and responsibilities Project facilities and resources
1.3 Authorization
This section contains the signatures of the project sponsor or sponsors, the project manager, and other key project stakeholders, confirming that they agre e to their roles, the description of the project, and the project deliverables and outcomes presented in the project charter.
2.3.2 Boundaries
This section outlines the major activities required to successfully complete the project and describes each activity in a way that specifies what is and what is not included in the activity. While the "Scope definition" section describes the main characteristics of the product(s) or service(s) to be produced by the project, the "Boundaries" section gives a broader view. This section identifies activities that are "out of scope"; including these activities will greatly reduce ambiguity. It is especially important for projects that are multi-phased or part of a bigger picture (i.e. program or portfolio) to define what is being delivered in the undertaking covered by the charter.
The table above is presented as an example. In many cases, further explanations may be required for a comprehensive presentation of the boundaries. The author may prefer to use the table as a summary and expand the description of each element in a narrative form.
2.4 Milestones
This section identifies the significant milestones or events in the project such as phases, stages, decision gates, or the approval of a deliverable. It presents a highlevel project schedule. Project Milestone Phase 1: Documenting Business Requirements Description Date
Translation of the requirements document into technical specifications for the building of a new yyyy-mm-dd water facility for a community Request for proposal completed, winning bidder selected, and contract awarded by Acquisition yyyy-mm-dd Branch Assessment of the alternative system delivery model yyyy-mm-dd
2.5 Deliverables
This section defines the key deliverables that the project is required to produce in order to achieve the stated objectives. It also includes internal project deliverables that are required in the project management process for review and approval (e.g. project plan, transition plan, communication plan, and lessons learned).
2.7 Dependencies
Many projects depend on external factors, whether within or outside the organization, such as the following: A predecessor or successor relationship exists with another project (e.g. an MOU or partnership); A related project expects a deliverable from your project; Your project expects a deliverable from a related project; or
If any situations like this exist, it is important to identify these relationships early. If you expect to have several interactions with the project managers of related projects, include corresponding information in the "Roles and responsibilities" section under "Project managers for related projects." Also, all dependencies should be listed and analyzed in the "Risks" sect ion to ensure monitoring and allow response to a risk as required. If this project is part of a program, the program charter may contain this information. The related project information should be included here or may be referred to in the program charter. This reference should be noted in "Section 4: Project References." For each related project, add an entry to the table below. In the dependency description, specify the organization or stakeholder that should be kept informed of the project's progress. If there are no related projects, this should be mentioned in the form of a generic statement. Dependency Description Critical Date Contact
2.8.1 Risks
This section outlines the risks identified at the start of the project. It includes a quick assessment of the significance of each risk (probability and effect) and how to address them. It is important to note that this initial risk assessment does not replace the full risk assessment conducted during the planning phase and documented within the project plan. More information and tools are included in the Project Plan Template at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/emf-cag/index-eng.asp and the Integrated Risk Management Implementation Guide at http://www.tbssct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/RiskManagement/siglist_e.asp. Project risk assessment No. 1. Risk Description Business owners may not be available during validation phase; this may affect the schedule. Probability Effect (H/M/L) (H/M/L) M H Planned Mitigation Resources have been secured with the manager of related divisions. A supply arrangement is in place to provide testers on a casual basis. Statement of
2.8.2 Assumptions
This section specifies all factors that are, for planning purposes, considered to be true, real, or certain but without including proof. During the planning process, these assumptions will be validated. If any assumptions are inaccurate, inconsistent, or incomplete, they will create project risks and may adversely affect project scope, timeline, and cost. The following table lists the items that cannot be proven or demonstrated at the time of publication but are documented to stabilize the project approach or planning. No. 1. 2. 3. The following is assumed: Release of funds will be timely to pay for contractors. Current service levels to stakeholders will be maintained throughout the project. Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA) will be completed in time as an input to the architectural system design.
2.8.3 Constraints
This section identifies the specific constraints or restrictions that limit or place conditions on the project, especially those associated with the project scope such as a hard deadline, a predetermined budget, a set milestone, contract provisions, or privacy or security considerations. The constraints can come from external factors (social, environmental, political, economic, and technological) or internal factors (resources, expertise, business requirements, legal requirements, facilities, and so on). In order to identify constraints, it is necessary to analyze the project environment. If there are several constraints, they should be classified by category. The following table lists examples of the fixed or pre-set factors that the project must respect: No. Category Constraints
1.
2.
3.
Resources
Resource Name(s)
Resource Name(s)
Financial officer
Business analyst
Resource Name(s)
Resource Name(s)
Resource Name(s)
Bibliography
Canada. National Defence (page accessed on April 10, 2008). "Project Organization" inMateriel Acquisition and Support Information System (MASIS) [Online], http://www.forces.gc.ca/admmat/masis/ipt_e.asp. Canada Revenue Agency (2008). Project Charter Template , Ottawa, Information Technology Branch, Version 1.4, February 18, 2008. Public Works and Government Services Canada (2007). A Guide to ITSB Project Management Process , Ottawa, Information Technology Branch, Project Management Office. Public Works and Government Services Canada (2007). ITSB Project Management Template , Ottawa, Information Technology Branch, Project Management Office.
1. Project Management Institute (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge , Third Edition, p. 368. 2. Those processes performed to authorize and define the scope of a new phase or project or that can result in the continuation of halted project work. 3. Project Management Institute (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge , Third Edition, p. 103. 4. Also referred to as "benefits realization" or "value management" plan.