5-Erosion and Sediment Control
5-Erosion and Sediment Control
5-Erosion and Sediment Control
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Bylaw No. 4754 amends Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw 2006 No. 4381 by updating
and amending clauses and definitions for consistency with related Bylaws, Township Policies
and the current Best Management Practices for erosion and sediment control. Further it
includes previously omitted fees for service on a user pay basis.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY
WHEREAS Section 8(3)(j) of the Community Charter, S.B.C. 2003, c. 26 authorizes Council
to regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in relation to the protection of the natural
environment;
AND WHEREAS Council deems it in the best interests of the environmental well being of the
community that the streams, creeks, waterways, ditches, storm sewers and drains that make
up the Township of Langley’s Drainage System are protected from sediment and sediment-
laden water;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the Township of Langley, in
Open Meeting Assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw
2006 No. 4381 Amendment Bylaw 2009 No.4754”.
2. The “Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw 2006 No. 4381” is amended by deleting
the text in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
PART 1.
1. Title
This Bylaw may be cited as “Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw 2009 No. 4381, as
amended”.
2. Definitions
In this Bylaw, unless the context otherwise requires, the following words shall have the
meanings described:
“CPESC” means a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control under the
certification program administered by the BC Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation
Society and the International Erosion Control Association.
“ESC COORDINATOR” means the employee(s) of the Township whose duties include
the monitoring and management of this Bylaw’s provisions.
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 2
“ESC FACILITIES” means all erosion and sediment control works, measures, facilities
and methods constructed or installed to reduce the likelihood of sediment and sediment-
laden water reaching the Township Drainage System during all stages of Construction.
“ESC PLAN” means the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan explained in Part II of this
Bylaw.
“ESC PERMIT” means the Erosion and Sediment Control Permit issued by the Township
to the Owner, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Bylaw.
“GUIDELINES” means the latest edition of the document entitled “Land Development
Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat”, co-published by the Ministry of
Environment and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans as amended from time to
time.
“NOTICE TO COMPLY” means a written notice from the Municipal Engineer to the
Owner that:
a) Alleges noncompliance with one or more Bylaw or Permit requirements, and/or
notes any failures to maintain the validity of the Permit;
b) Requires that all construction activities, other than those necessary to remedy the
specified noncompliance must cease; and
c) Requires remedy of the noncompliance within 24 hours, or if in the opinion of the
Municipal Engineer special circumstances exist, on a date the Municipal Engineer
considers reasonable given the circumstances.
“NTU” means nephelometric turbidity unit and is a standard unit measure of water
turbidity.
“SEDIMENT OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER” means any sediment, rock, gravel, sand,
soil, silt, clay, earth, construction or excavation wastes or other substances whether or
not suspended in water.
“STOP WORK ORDER” means a written notice from the Municipal Engineer to the
Owner ordering the Owner to halt all construction activity on the subject site until further
notice.
“90% FINAL COVER” means the stage of development at which 90% of final ground
cover is in place.
3. Prohibition of Discharge
a) No person shall cause, or permit another person to cause, sediment or sediment-
laden water to be discharged, either directly or indirectly, into the Township
Drainage System.
b) Without limiting the generality of Section 3. a), no person shall discharge, either
directly or indirectly water with turbidity greater than 25 NTU, or as indicated by
current Fisheries and Oceans Canada Guidelines/Best Management Practices,
into the Township Drainage system, unless a Significant Rainfall Event has
occurred.
c) For Construction sites where an ESC permit has been issued, no person shall
discharge, either directly or indirectly, water with turbidity greater than 25 NTU, or
as indicated by current Fisheries and Oceans standards, into the Township
Drainage System unless a Significant Rainfall Event has occurred.
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 4
d) For Construction sites where an ESC Permit has been issued, no person shall
discharge, either directly or indirectly, water with a turbidity greater than 100 NTU,
or as indicated by current Fisheries and Oceans Canada standards, into the
Township Drainage System within 24 hours of a Significant Rainfall Event.
4. ESC Permit
a) All Construction sites, on land having a Developable Area less than 2000m2, shall
comply with the water quality criteria described in Section 3. b) and utilize the best
management practices for erosion and sediment control set out hereto in
Schedule “B”. However, should a person wish to use NTU limits for a Significant
Rainfall Event as specified in Section 3. d), an ESC Permit will be required
regardless of Developable Area.
b) No Construction shall occur on any land having a Developable Area over 2000m2
and zoned other than agricultural as per the Townships Zoning Bylaw 1987 No.
2500, as amended, until such time as the Township has issued an ESC Permit, or
a written exemption to the ESC Permit requirement.
c) If works, other than those directly related to the activities of a permit holder, result
in a negative impact on the Township Drainage System, then that person causing
the impact and not the permit holder shall be held responsible.
d) An application for an ESC Permit must:
i. be made in the form set out in Schedule “A” to this bylaw;
ii. be signed by the Owner;
iii. have attached an ESC Plan;
iv. name an ESC Facilities Designer and ESC Monitor as identified in the
Letter of Appointment attached hereto as Schedule “C”;
v. include a non-refundable fee of a minimum of five hundred dollars ($500)
or as calculated by the ESC Coordinator at 5% of the supply, installation
and maintenance costs of the ESC Facilities up to a maximum of two
thousand dollars ($2,000); and
vi. include a security deposit in cash, certified cheque or an Irrevocable Letter
of Credit drawn on a Canadian Chartered Bank and payable to the
Township of Langley for a term of at least twelve (12) months in an
amount calculated by the ESC Coordinator to be one hundred and twenty
per cent (120%) of the supply, installation and maintenance cost of the
ESC Facilities proposed for the site or in an amount as determined by the
Municipal Engineer.
5. Exception
a) Notwithstanding Sections 4. a) and b), the requirement to obtain an ESC Permit
may be waived by the Municipal Engineer should the proposed Construction be
shown to have no negative impact on the Township Drainage System, having
regard to the following factors:
i. construction timing and schedule;
ii. size of the proposed building or structure;
iii. soil conditions;
iv. existing ground cover (trees, gravel, etc.);
v. topographical conditions; and
vi. location of proposed Construction with respect to the location of the
Township Drainage System.
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 5
6. Term
a) An ESC Permit shall be valid for 12 months following the date of issuance. The
ESC Permit may be extended for an additional period of time if the holder of the
ESC Permit applies in writing, up to 1 month prior to the permit expiry date, to the
ESC Coordinator, whose acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld.
b) Applications for extension must be accompanied by an administration fee of five
hundred dollars ($500) and will be valid for no longer than one year from the
original expiry date of the ESC Permit.
7. Amendments
a) Amendments must be requested in writing, signed by a Qualified Professional and
must be accompanied by an administration fee of five hundred dollars ($500).
8. Security Deposit
a) The Security deposit submitted with the ESC Permit application is to secure the
full and proper compliance with the provisions of the ESC Permit and of this
Bylaw. In the event the holder of an ESC Permit has not complied with the
provisions of this Bylaw or fulfilled all the terms and conditions expressed in the
ESC Permit and Construction has commenced, the necessary funds from the
security deposit may be drawn down, at the Township’s option, and the money
used either by the Township or its agents to protect the Township Drainage
System.
b) When the amount of the security deposit is insufficient for the Township to
complete the works necessary for protecting the Township Drainage System, the
holder of the ESC Permit shall pay any deficiency to the Township on demand.
c) When the holder of an ESC Permit complies with the provisions of this Bylaw and
fulfills the terms and conditions expressed in the ESC Permit, the Township shall
return the security deposit to that person at such time as the development has
reached 90% Final Cover or earlier when the ESC Facilities can be removed to
the acceptance of the Municipal Engineer.
PART II
9. ESC Plan
a) All ESC Plans must be designed in accordance with the Guidelines and best
management practices for erosion and sediment control as set out hereto in
Schedule “B”.
b) All ESC Plans must be prepared under the guidance of an ESC Facilities
Designer and must be checked, signed and sealed by the Facilities Designer.
c) All ESC plans submitted with an ESC Permit application must be acceptable to
the Municipal Engineer and must include, at a minimum, the following:
i. A multi stage plan which shows the measures for erosion and sediment
control during clearing and grubbing, the installation of services, the
building construction and the final grading and landscaping;
ii. Anticipated soil type in all areas to be disturbed and at all depths to be
excavated;
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 6
iii. Notes or other instructions that ensure that any existing ground cover are
maintained as long as practicably possible, work is staged to prevent
erosion whenever possible and that exposed soils are placed under non-
erosive cover as soon as possible;
iv. Proposed methods to ensure licensed vehicles do not track sediment or
other debris onto paved roads;
v. Proposed site access locations;
vi. Wheel wash facilities as required;
vii. Minimum specifications for all ESC related materials including but not
limited to; gravels, sediment fence, hydroseed or other erosion or
sediment controls referred to in the ESC Plan;
viii. Property line(s) and other legal designations of the subject property or
properties;
ix. Locations of any existing underground services, as well as any proposed
connection to existing services from the site;
x. Location(s) of any trenches, basements, vaults or any other underground
structures with proposed methods to manage excavation and trench de-
watering;
xi. Location(s) of any existing drainage infrastructure and the proposed
measures to protect it;
xii. Location(s) of any existing and proposed watercourses, ditches, swales or
any other body of water within 50 metres of the site boundaries, along with
the proposed protection measures;
xiii. Location(s) of any existing and/or proposed buildings, including residential
buildings or ancillary buildings or structures;
xiv. Existing and proposed contours and relevant spot elevations;
xv. Proposed ESC Facilities to be implemented on site, which shall include
source controls as the primary method of erosion and sediment control;
xvi. Pond sizing calculations, if applicable;
xvii. Pond deactivation methodology, if applicable;
xviii. For ESC Plans including Treatment Chemicals, the proponent must also
provide:
a. The Material Safety Data Sheet and technical specifications including
ecological toxicity data from the Treatment Chemical manufacturer;
b. A field testing kit for the Treatment Chemical, sensitive to one-tenth the
LC50 of said Treatment Chemical for the most locally applicable
species of aquatic organism noted on the Material Safety Data Sheet;
c. Anticipated normal dose rate
d. A detailed description of any apparatus used with the Treatment
Chemical. Any automated apparatus must include a failsafe shutoff
such that in case of chemical overdose or excess turbidity the
discharge to the Township drainage system is automatically stopped;
e. An operations manual for the apparatus; and
f. A list of qualified individuals to operate the apparatus.
xix. Proposed methods to restore disturbed areas following the completion of
building construction; and
xx. Any and all other details pertaining to the proposed Construction,
describing how the ESC Facilities will meet the water quality criteria.
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 7
d) Upon acceptance of the ESC Plan by the Municipal Engineer and approval of the
ESC Permit application, the Municipal Engineer may issue an ESC Permit which
may include such specific terms and conditions as the Municipal Engineer
considers necessary in his sole discretion to reduce the likelihood of sediment
and sediment laden water reaching the Township Drainage System.
e) It is the responsibility of the Owner to ensure that all ESC Facilities described in
the ESC Plan are constructed, implemented, installed, monitored, maintained and
decommissioned according to the ESC Plan.
PART III
11. Signage
a) Every Construction site where an ESC Permit has been issued must have a
waterproof sign posted in a location visible from outside the Construction site for
the duration of the Construction project. The sign shall clearly state the name and
phone number of the ESC Facilities Designer, the ESC Monitor and the Township
ESC Coordinator.
Bylaw No. 4754
Page 8
PART IV
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Council receive this report entitled Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw 2006 No. 4381
Amendment Bylaw 2009 No. 4754, for information; and further
That Council give first, second and third reading to Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw 2006
No. 4381 Amendment Bylaw 2009 No. 4754.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw No. 4381 was adopted by Council on September 25, 2006
as a result of a mandate issued by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to regulate
the amount of silt laden storm water entering into storm sewer systems, ditches, creeks and
streams during construction activity of development projects. The bylaw has been effective by
requiring Developers to retain qualified professionals to prepare detailed erosion and sediment
control plans and obtaining Permits from the Township prior to construction; and further to
monitor the site during construction to ensure bylaw compliance. In consultation with DFO and
the development community staff has recently completed a comprehensive review of the bylaw
and the proposed amendments, which could generally be termed as ‘housekeeping’ are
intended to correct any inconsistencies with other related bylaws, restructure enforcement
measures, address permitting fees and provide updated best management practices, as
reflected in Schedule “A” of the Bylaw, presented as Attachment “A” to this report.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to request Council’s consideration of amendments to the Erosion
and Sediment Control Bylaw.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BYLAW 2006 NO. 4381
AMENDMENT BYLAW 2009 NO. 4754.
Page 2 . . .
BACKGROUND/HISTORY:
In 2006 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans enacted a mandate to regulate the amount of
silt laden storm water entering streams, creeks, waterways, waterworks, ditches, drains and the
Municipal drainage system. To satisfy this requirement, Council adopted the Erosion and
Sediment Control (ESC) Bylaw No. 4381 on September 25, 2006.
The new position of ESC Coordinator was hence created to implement the Bylaw and review
plans, issue permits, monitor development sites and provide enforcement measures in
accordance with Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw No. 4381. Initially the implementation of
the bylaw concentrated on educating the development industry and was successful in
communicating the importance of generating a functional “staged plan” design to control erosion
and minimize the amount of sediment generated during the construction phase of development.
In 2008, the full implementation of the bylaw was enforced which included the preparation of an
Erosion and Sediment Control Permit for each development project, submission of monitoring
results to ensure compliance with bylaw regulations and enforcement measures as required.
We have recently reviewed the effectiveness of the bylaw and have determined that there is a
need to amend the bylaw to correct inconsistencies with other related bylaws, restructure
enforcement measures, address the Permitting process and Fees, and update best
management practices.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
The current Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw has been fully implemented for approximately
one year and a comprehensive review has been completed recently. In consultation with the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans, other jurisdictions and the development industry, staff has
proposed amendments to address inconsistencies with other related bylaws, restructure
enforcement measures, the permitting process and fees, and update approved best
management practices. More specifically, the inconsistencies with other bylaws relate mainly to
terminology used in other bylaws. The restructure of enforcement measures will allow for
ticketing for non-compliance prior to issuance of stop work orders. A review of current permitting
process and fee structure indicates a shortfall in the anticipated funding for bylaw
administration. Therefore, additional fees are proposed to ensure the adequate level of service
is being provided when amendments are proposed to a previously approved plan. Lastly, the
process and procedure to permit the use of new environmentally friendly products have been
incorporated into the bylaw.
Intergovernmental Implications
The proposed Bylaw amendments were developed and are being implemented in collaboration
with the City of Surrey, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and representatives from the
development industry.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BYLAW 2006 NO. 4381
AMENDMENT BYLAW 2009 NO. 4754.
Page 3 . . .
Financial Implications
The revised Permitting Fee structure is based on a “user pay” principle and is intended to
ensure fees are set at a level commensurate with services provided. Additional fees relate to
permit amendments, extensions and exemptions which are not currently charged to applicants.
Respectfully submitted,
David Anderson
MANAGER, DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
for
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
DA/da
ATTACHMENT A: Erosion & Sediment Control Bylaw 2006 No. 4381 Amendment Bylaw
2009 No. 4754