Purging While Welding
Purging While Welding
Purging While Welding
Contents
Purging can enhance your weld quality by improving corrossion resistance
03 04 07 08 10 12 13 14 15 15 Introduction emper colours and T corrosion resistance lassification and action C of backing gases riteria for selection C of the shielding gas urging techniques, purging rate, P effect of pipe length urging hardware and P measuring instruments ondensation films, C manganese streaks Supplying gas via hoses Workplace safety while purging References
02
Introduction
The primary reason for the wide use of stainless steels is their general corrosion resistance. To ensure the operational safety of weldments of high-alloy steels under corrosive conditions, it is further necessary to maintain the special characteristics of these materials when producing welded joints. The exposure to heat and oxygen during the welding process results in the formation of temper colours on stainless steels and other materials (e.g. titanium). These are bands of various colours around the penetration bead and adjacent parent material that can severely reduce the corrosion resistance of high-alloy materials, and usually must be avoided or removed.
Methods for removing temper colours are classied as chemical, electrochemical and mechanical. Pickling, a purely chemical process used to remove temper colours and other impurities from the workpiece surface through treatment with a mixture of various acids can often not be employed for reasons of availability and environmental protection. Devices for electrochemical removal of discolourations require manual operation and are therefore only practical for use with smaller workpieces. When blasting or using mechanical techniques (grinding, brushing) accessibility permitting, the required degree of removal or cleaning effect is often questionable. In addition, there is always the risk that stainless and non-alloyed steel materials may be unintentionally mixed up. Shielding the weld root with an inert gasvia purgingpresents an alternative to these methods. Several aspects of the application and peculiarities of this technique are described in the following.
03
Fig. 1: Protected and unprotected weld roots penetration beads. Manual TIG, stainless steel.
04
The question as to which temper colours may be left untreated while still ensuring adequate corrosion resistance to pitting is now quite easy to answer. Figure 2 shows a curve illustrating the pitting corrosion potential as a function of the thickness of the oxide layer for three common CrNi materials, namely, a standardgrade CrNi steel (304), a titanium-stabilised CrNiMo steel (316Ti) and a duplex material (2205). For this experiment, the temper colours were produced over a large area in an annealing furnace under a controlled atmosphere and subsequently subjected to an electrochemical corrosion examination. The result of this investigation is the pitting corrosion potential, an electrical parameter that indicates how resistant a material is to pitting corrosion; the higher the potential, the greater the corrosion resistance. The pitting corrosion potentials of the unaffected base materials are about 550 mV, 750 mV and 1400 mV, they approximately follow the extrapolation of the lines to lower temperatures (dotted lines). The gure shows clearly that in the area of yellow temper colours (formation temperature between 200C and 400C) the pitting corrosion resistance is hardly affected. In contrast, in the area of the red and red-brown colours (400C to 800C), the potential drops considerably to the same low value for all three materials. This means that almost all CrNi materials exhibit identical loss of resistance in red temper colour areas regardless of the alloys composition. At higher formation temperatures, the pitting corrosion potential increases greatly once again. The values achieved there are almost as high as those of the respective unaffected base materials.
Considering the blue temper colour on its own, a reasonable corrosion resistance can be assumed. However, when welding, temperature variations between the melting temperature of the steel, on the one hand, and room temperature, on the other, always occur. The consequence is that wherever a blue temper colour appears, there is also a red area, with the corrosion resistance effects described above. The upshot is that yellow temper colours can usually be left untouched in most cases (the brighter, the better); while all other colour tones reduce the resistance signicantly and must be removed. Industries where cleanliness and purity are especially important, e.g. the food processing and pharmaceutical industries, still require complete absence of temper colours in most cases. As little as 30 ppm of residual oxygen may be enough to create temper colours. At levels below 50 ppm, formation of temper colours is usually less common; 100 ppm are generally considered a limit when processing stainless steels. Above this value, increased formation of temper colours can be expected. In addition to the residual oxygen level, the extent of temper colour formation depends on other factors as well, e.g. the surface condition of the material and the heat input during welding. This situation is illustrated in Figure 3. The gure shows two series of tests involving TIG orbital welding of stainless steel pipes that differ in terms of wall thickness and material. It illustrates clearly that the formation of temper colours differs despite having an identical residual oxygen level in each case. It is thus not possible to specify general limits for the residual oxygen level.
Fig. 2: Pitting corrosion resistance as a function of oxide layer thickness [2] (WS = PRE = Pitting Resistance Equivalent).
1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 200 400 600 800 304 1000 1200 316 Ti 2250
05
Method
Brushing Grinding Grite blasting Pickling
Comments
Minimal removal, relatively little corrosion resistance achievable Uniform removal is difcult, risk of local overheating Only minimal removal, preferable surface condition Chemical removal, very good resistance achievable, severe oxidation and slag must be removed prior to pickling Good cleaning action, but often a slow process Little or only slight oxide formation
Fig. 3: Effect of increasing residual oxygen level at the weld root on temper colour formation
2 ppm
15 ppm
30 ppm
60 ppm
120 ppm
06
Fig. 4: Effect of hydrogen additions on prevention of temper colours at a constant residual oxygen level
07
Backing gas
Argon-hydrogen mixtures Nitrogen-hydrogen mixtures (forming gases) Argon
ISO 14175
R1 or R2 R5 I1
Materials
Austenitic CrNi steels Ni and Ni-based materials Austenitic CrNi steels All metallic materials suitable for fusion welding, e.g.: austenitic CrNi steels, austenitic-ferritic steels (duplex), ferritic Cr steels, gas-sensitive materials (e.g. Ti, Zr), hydrogensensitive materials (high-strength ne-grain structural steels, copper and copper alloys, aluminium and aluminium alloys, other nonferrous metals) Austenitic CrNi steels, austenitic-ferritic steels (duplex)
Nitrogen
N1
08
Ar mixtures
1.2
1.1
1.0
Air
0.8
0.7
N2 mixtures
0.6 4 8 12 % of H2 by volume 16 20 24
Fig. 5: Weld appearance for a titanium-stabilised stainless steel with various backing gases
Backing gas
Argon
N2
Argon + 100ppm O2
09
02 Content [ppm]
10.000
5.000 4.000 3.000 2.000
40 20
12
6m 60.3mm 20.9%
Gas inow over the full diameter via sintered metal 0.4m plastic hose 30.0 Cu-and stainless tube Purge Gas Argon
1.000
500 400 300 200
100
50 40 30 20
10
5 4 3 2
60 120 110s
180
360
10
According to this relationship, doubling the gas ow rate cuts the purging time in half. The truth is actually somewhat different, since with large amounts of gas and at high ow rates, turbulence occurs at both the purging gas/air interface and the walls of the workpiece. This turbulence results in mixing and thus a lowering of the purging rate. The results of this turbulence can be seen from the following experiment: To determine the purging action and the current residual oxygen level, the reduction in the O2 content of the purging gas was measured for different amounts of gas and ow rates in identically sized pipes, Figure 6. In this experiment, the length purged was 6 m and the pipe diameter 60.3 mm. Argon was used as the purging gas. The rst measurement of the purging time was completed upon reaching an O2 content of 104 ppm = 10,000 ppm = 1%. At a gas ow rate of 4 l/min, this value was reached after 210 s. After doubling the gas ow rate to 8 l/min, it was possible to reach the 1% O2 limit approx. 90 s sooner. To save an additional 90 seconds, however, the gas ow rate cannot be doubled but must instead be increased vefold to 40 l/min, as can be seen in the diagram. The purging rate is thus not absolutely proportional to the value of the gas ow rate. Let us now examine the purging action of various gas ow rates below 1% oxygen, namely, in the region between 1% and 10 ppm. At a ow rate of 4 l/min, the 1% O2 limit was reached after 210 seconds; the 10 ppm level, after approx. 320 seconds. The difference between these is approx. 110 seconds. If the ow rate were increased tenfold, namely, to 40 l/min, 1% O2 is reached after 30 seconds, 10 ppm after approx. 140 s. The difference between 1% and 10 ppm O2 purging is also 110 seconds in this case! In this example, it would therefore be practical to rst remove the largest amount of oxygen in the shortest length of time using a high gas ow rate, and then reduce the gas ow rate. The amount of purging gas consumed can be reduced considerably in this way without incurring any signicant time loss.
Purging can enhance your weld quality by improving weld surface appearance
Measuring instruments
The effect of even minimal amounts of residual oxygen on the general corrosion resistance of stainless steels has already been shown in Chapter 2 Temper colours and corrosion resistance. To obtain reproducible purging results, use of residual oxygen measuring instruments is advisable. In actual practice, homemade solutions are often employed to determine when the residual oxygen level has dropped below a certain value and welding can begin. For instance, the ame from a cigarette lighter is often held at the gas discharge or at the welding location to check whether welding can already start. These homemade solutions are not recommended and are often questionable from the standpoint of safety. At best, they provide information as to whether backing gas is being discharged at all, but nothing about the residual oxygen level at the root. Various residual oxygen measuring instruments are available on the market. Two things should be kept in mind when making a selection: The unit must have an adequate measuring range. The minimum residual oxygen level that can be measured should be below 10ppm. Units that can only display to 0.1% (=1000 ppm) are not suitable for this purpose. The unit should have the ability to switch between hydrogencontaining and non-hydrogen-containing backing gases. With the sensors commonly employed, hydrogen can affect the accuracy and speed of the measurement, a fact that can be compensated for electronically when switching. Figure 8 presents a selection of various measuring instruments by way of example. Depending on the design, the residual oxygen level can be displayed numerically or via an LED display. On some instruments, it is also possible to set an alarm that signals when the level exceeds or drops below a specic value.
12
Fig. 9: Typical condensation film next to the weld, referred to as the manganese streak
13
Fig. 10: Release of moisture into the backing gas by contaminated hose material
Dew- H20 point [ppm] [C] -12 -22 -32 -42 -52 -62 -72 -82 2160 850 305 101 31 8.2 1.9 0.38 0.1 1.0 10 Purge time [min] 100 =1.67h 1,000 2,480 =47.3h 10,000 stainless steel tube, 8x1 PVC hose purge gas: pure nitrogen, < 1.9ppm moisture
14
Author
Thomas Ammann
References
[1] Lippold J.C., Kotecki D.J.: Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels, Wiley, 2005. [2] Ruge J, Radebold L.: Einu von durch Schweien erzeugten Oxidlmen auf die Lochfrabestndigkeit nichtrostender austenitischer Chrom-Nickel-Sthle in annhernd neutralen Chloridlsungen. BMFT-Abschlubericht FE-KKs, Vol. 5, Proj.Nr. B2.6/3, 101-104 (1990), DECHEMA Frankfurt. [3] N.N.: Abschlubericht AiF 14.426N, Einu von Gasschluchen auf die Feuchte-, Wasserstoff- und Sauerstoffproblematik in Schutzgasschwei-prozessen. ISF Aachen, 2007. [4] N.N.: DVS-Merkblatt 0937 Formieren beim Schweien, DVS-Verlag. [5] DIN EN ISO 14175 (2008-06): Schweizustze Gase und Mischgase fr das Lichtbogenschweien und verwandte Prozesse. Beuth Verlag, Berlin. [6] DIN EN 439 (1995-05): Schweizustze Schutzgase zum Lichtbogenschweien und Schneiden. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.
15
For more information contact the BOC Customer Service Centre on: Australia
131 262
customer.servicenz@boc.com www.boc.co.nz
BOC Limited
ABN 95 000 029 729
BOC Limited
WN007748
Riverside Corporate Park 10 Julius Avenue North Ryde, NSW 2113 Australia
BOC is a trading name of BOC Limited, a member of The Linde Group. BOC Limited 2010. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.
016
Details given in this document are believed to be correct at the time of printing. Whilst proper care has been taken in the preparation, no liability for injury or damage resulting from its improper use can be accepted.