2030 Development Jamaica Planning
2030 Development Jamaica Planning
2030 Development Jamaica Planning
(1st DRAFT)
Table of Contents
Page Numbers
List of Acronyms 2
Introduction 3
Situational Analysis – Brief Overview 5
SWOT Analysis 13
Vision 17
Goals, Objectives, Strategies 17
Way Forward 18
Appendices 19
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Planning in Jamaica originated in local government (McHardy 2002). The local government or
vestry system was established by the British in 1664. The system consisted of local authorities,
which had jurisdiction over their parishes for services such as poor relief, maintenance of roads,
support of the clergy and the maintenance of order. The vestry system was subsequently
reviewed between 1867 and 1887 and a new system introduced. Under the new system, 14 local
authorities known as parochial boards were created. These local authorities comprised elected
members and members nominated by the governor. The system has remained largely unchanged
for over 60 years with the exception of “the extension of the franchise for electing local
representatives in 1947 to include all adults, and the gradual elimination of non-elected members
of the councils@ (Miller 1996 in McHardy, 2002).
Since the 1800s, planning has been undertaken on the basis of parish boundaries. A significant
milestone in the evolution of planning in Jamaica was the establishment of a Town Planning
Department (TPD) in 1957, under the Town and Country Planning (TCP) Act of the same year.
This Act was promulgated to address mounting concerns about social and economic conditions
that prevailed in the county in the late 1950s and came at a time when national planning was
emerging as the framework for economic development. Since 1957, the TPD has produced a
number of development plans for certain areas (though not mandated by the TCP Act) and a
number of development orders as stipulated by the Act.
Today, planning in Jamaica is conducted at the central and local government levels. At the
central government level is the Ministry of Local Government and Environment (MLGE), which
has responsibility for policy direction and guidance to seven agencies (including the National
Environment and Planning Agency [NEPA], Social Development Commission [SDC], National
Solid Waste Management Authority [NSWA] and the Sports Development Foundation [SDF])
and 14 Local Authorities at the local level. Prior to 2001, planning at the central level was split
among the NRCA (Natural Resources Authority), Town Planning Department through the TCPA
(Town and Country Planning Authority), and the LDUC (Land Development and Utilization
Commission). The NRCA’s mandate was the conservation, protection and proper management
of the natural resources of Jamaica; the TCPA was an advisory body to the local authorities,
whose advice was expected to ensure the orderly planning of Jamaica; and the LDUC which has
a statutory mandate to ensure that prime agricultural lands are kept in agricultural production in
the interests of, inter alia, food security and self sustainability. These agencies were merged in
2001 as a result of the Government of Jamaica Public Sector Modernization Programme (PSMP)
on the basis that the merged entity would integrate environmental planning and sustainable
development policies and programmes, and to improve customer service.
Local Authorities comprise twelve parish councils, the municipal authority of Kingston and St.
Andrew, which is called the Kingston and St. Andrew Corporation (KSAC) and the Portmore
Municipal Council. The local authorities are empowered to make by-laws, regulations and rules
for the good governance of the parishes over which they have jurisdiction. The responsibilities
of the Parish Councils include regulation powers in respect to building and planning approvals
and development control, licensing of trades and businesses, street parking, control of public
vending; and spearhead plans and initiatives for the orderly, balanced and sustainable of the
parish as a whole and major towns in particular, and for the boosting of economic activity and
local wealth creation within the parish.
This Sector Plan for Urban Planning and Regional Development is premised on a vision shared
by planners of civil society, private sector, and state the important roles they collectively have to
play in shaping the planning process to 2030. Urban planning and regional development is
geared towards supporting the economic and social development of all parishes in Jamaica to
achieve their full potential. This Plan aims to promote the development of Jamaica within a co-
ordinated, coherent and mutually beneficial framework.
It is one of twenty-eight chapters that would form the foundation for the development of Jamaica
2030 – a 25-year plan designed to put Jamaica in a position to achieve developed country status
by 2030. Jamaica 2030 is based on a fundamental vision to ‘make Jamaica the place of choice to
raise families, live, work and do business,’ and on guiding principles which put ‘people’ at the
centre of Jamaica’s transformation.
The preparation of the Plan is supported by a quantitative systems dynamics model – Threshold
21 (T21) – which supports comprehensive, integrated planning that would enable the
consideration of a broad range of interconnected factors along economic, social and
environmental considerations and will be used to project future consequences of different
strategies across a whole range of indicators. In addition, it enables planners to trace causes of
changes in any variable or indicator back to the assumptions.
The first draft of this sector plan was developed using the following processes:
• Task Force Meetings1 and a workshop that were used to solicit ideas and views from
members2 on urban planning and regional development (UPRD) issues and challenges
facing Jamaica , identify a vision for UPRD in Jamaica, and determine key goals,
objectives and strategies for the sector
• Research on international best practices
urban planning and regional development
that could be adopted in the Jamaican
context
• Strategic meetings between the Chair of
the Task Force, the technical secretaries
and the consultant of the PIOJ
1
See Appendix 2 for Listing of Task Force Meetings
2
See Appendix 1 for List of Members of the Urban Planning and Regional Development Task Force
3
A full situational analysis on urban planning and regional development has been prepared and is available from the
PIOJ
increased to $203 500 in 2004 from $122 300 in 2000. Some of the more recent developments
such as improvements to the country’s road network and expansion in the tourism sectors have
created the stimulus for future development of the country. Although some benefits have been
derived from the pattern of development, they have left the country with a myriad of problems
including fragmented subdivisions, unbalanced regional development, urban sprawl,
availability of affordable housing, squatting, inequity and poverty, environmental
degradation; and congested towns due to the increasing dependence on automobiles.
All of these problems are all inter-related. Even though some effort has been made to address
them, it is clear that current development policies are not sufficiently comprehensive and far-
reaching. What is also known is that these problems will not be tolerated in a modern society
which Jamaica is striving to become. Innovative urban and regional planning (based on
sustainability principles) can play a great role in developing such a development framework. In
particular, urban and regional planning is important to the sustainable development of Jamaica in
several ways, as it promotes the development of clear-cut policies, programmes and plans; the
decentralization of power and decision-making; and the optimization the use of resources. In
addition it facilitates the development of multi-sectoral and spatial linkages; it identifies the
growth potential of areas, and the most effective means of harnessing this potential; and informs
market decisions by revealing trends in the economy, society and the natural environment.
In the end, the aim should be to have urban and regional planning play its true role of improving
the welfare of Jamaicans “creating more convenient, equitable, healthful, efficient and attractive
places for present and future generations”.
Institutional/Legislative Framework
As noted in the Introduction above, the planning process is largely driven by the MLGE through
14 local planning authorities (Parish Councils and the Portmore Municipality), the Town and
Country Planning Authority (TCPA) and its subcommittees, and NEPA. Other public agencies,
some with their own legislative authority and guidelines, complete the planning system and
create a situation where the authority of some agencies sometimes overlap and conflict. Some of
these institutions include:
Planning is guided by a number of Acts, some of which are highlighted in Table 1 below. These
Acts complement the National Land Policy for Jamaica which is said to set Athe framework to
enhance the efficient planning, management, development and use of land Y in order to achieve
complementary and compatible development which is in harmony with economic and socio-
cultural factors@. However, the existence of 103 pieces of land and land-related legislation and
regulations identifies a need for legislative reform to facilitate Aeffective administration,
management, use, preservation, development and control of the country's natural resources@4.
Panning is also guided by Development Orders, which are the legal documents used to guide
development under the TCP Act. They stipulate the physical planning guidelines and standards
to ensure safe and satisfactory forms of development at the local, regional and national levels.
Quarries Act,1984 Requires every person who operates a quarry The Town and Country
to first obtain approval from the Planning Department is one of
Commissioner of Mines. Allows for the agencies responsible for the
suspension of permit and closure where an processing of applications for
existing quarry presents a threat to the quarrying, since it is considered
environment or to persons an act of development as
defined by the TCP Act.
A number of initiatives to modernize urban and regional planning in Jamaica, and to support the
proper management, conservation and protection of the natural resources of the country has been
adopted in recent times. These measures vary from the national to the regional levels and include
modernizing the Permits and Licenses System; revisions of TCP Act; local government reform
and creation of civil society governance mechanisms such as the Parish Development
Committees. The use of technology has increased and guidelines for squatter management have
been developed and approved by the public.
One of the most significant steps was the adoption of a Local Sustainable Development Planning
Framework (LSDF) in 2003. The LSDP is defined as:
“an interdisciplinary approach to planning which will enable government, business and civil
society to provide people with basic needs; generate economic opportunities while, at the same
time, ensure a vital, healthy natural environment. Local sustainable development planning is
expected to promote and support the implementation of values, principles, goals, processes and
standards which provide people with knowledge, skills and motivation to plan community and
regional courses of development across Jamaica; to meet the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” (A Framework for
Local Sustainable Development Planning in Jamaica, 2001)
Since then, several local authorities have begun production of Local Sustainable Ddevelopment
Plans. The programme began in Portland and a Sustainable Development Plan/Development
Order has been completed for Kingston and St. Andrew. Manchester has completed a draft plan,
and St. Thomas, Clarendon and St. James have started the process. However, there is inadequate
funding for the majority of the parishes to develop Sustainable Development Plans and some
parishes lack the appropriate capacity.
The merger of TPD, NRCA, LUDC to create the Executive Agency, NEPA was an attempt to
create a one-stop shop to make the approval process more efficient, effective, transparent and
policy driven. These agencies were merged as a result of the Government of Jamaica Public
Sector Modernization Programme (PSMP) on the basis that the merged entity (NEPA) would
integrate environmental planning and sustainable development policies and programmes and to
improve customer service. The agency is expected to ensure that the sustainable development
mandate is carried out and more closely interfaced with planning and environmental decisions.
An important element of this merger is the proposed NEPA Act, which is currently being
prepared with the support of the CIDA Environmental Action (ENACT) Programme. Some
critics argue that NEPA has not been as effective as required partly because the enabling
legislation is not in place and because of its organizational format. Executive Agencies, it is
believed, have a business-centric focus resulting in inadequate attention being paid to technical
areas.
The ongoing Local Government Reform process is aimed at bringing government to the people
and involves reform at the financial, political, physical, educational and economic levels. While
the programme has facilitated some amount of infrastructure upgrading and capacity building, its
impact has not been as far-reaching as originally anticipated as decision making is still largely
concentrated at the centre. In fact, there has been decentralization with limited devolution. An
element of the reform was the creation of Civil Society Mechanisms (Parish Development
Committees) and other community based organizations etc. These organizations have been
established to give local communities a voice in the development arena. This enables decisions
to be made in a comprehensive and transparent manner; it also increases the likelihood of people
buying into the planning process. The latter might be exemplified by the LSDP process that has
thus far been embarked on for the parishes of Portland, Manchester and Kingston and St.
Andrew.
A notable area of capacity strengthening in the Local Authorities has been the introduction of a
Director of Planning in each Council complemented by a physical planner in some. The impact
of this development on the planning system has, however, been modified by the absence of a
designated Town Planner at the centre and up-to-date legislation and planning ordinances.
Technology use has also been improved across the system and especially in the central agencies
where GIS support is being used in land administration, mapping, disaster management etc.
However, technological capacity remains weak in most of the local planning agencies either for
technical work or to aid transactions by the public.
The planning system has also benefited from the revision/updating/introduction of a number of
instruments. Among them:
• Guidelines re the placement of Telecommunications Towers
• Guidelines for squatter management and the establishment of a Squatter Management
Unit in the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands
• Preparation of a National Building Act
• A System for the Processing of Subdivision Applications of 9 Lots and under 5 acres
within the Parish Councils
• Pre-Development Applications Consultations Process
• Development Approval Tracking System (AMANDA)
• Permits and Licenses System. This entails the analysis of the existing framework and
proposals to make the process more transparent, accountable, less cumbersome and
customer orientated. It involves the inclusion of other categories of developments into the
permit system, the increase of penalties and implementation of a more comprehensive
screening system
• A draft Sustainable Rural Development Policy developed to promote rural development
• A Tourism Framework of Action prepared in response to the infusion of foreign direct
investment in tourism and highlights the need to address emerging planning and
environmental issues in the sector.
Additionally, the TCP Act and the National Land Policy (996) are currently being revised. The
goal of the revision of the TCP Act is to make provisions to improve the enforcement system, to
devolve most planning powers to the local authorities where they rightly belong and for greater
citizen participation in the process. The goal of the revision of the National Land Policy is to
improve land titling, tenure, access, acquisition, pricing and divestment; and taxation and
incentives for property development processes.
In spite of the initiatives to improvements in the planning system, the country continues to be
plagued by uncontrolled and disorderly growth of urban areas. Some of the main factors
influencing this include the underdevelopment of rural areas and the persistence of rural
poverty, and weaknesses in the planning system.
Almost 52 percent (1 417 308 in 2005) of Jamaica’s population resides in urban areas, an
increase of 16.75 percent from 1991 and 4.58% from 2001. With an estimated annual increase
of 1.31% per annum, the urban population for the country is projected to be 1 528 143 in 2020
and 1 869 272 in 2030 (see Table 2). Much of the growth in urban population has resulted from
rural-urban migration. The migration is fuelled in part by the unattractiveness of some rural
areas. They are characterized by high incidence of poverty (an incidence of 21.1 % compared
with the national incidence of 14.8%), high levels of unemployment, poor health conditions, low
educational achievements, limited access to infrastructure and basic services, increasing
environmental degradation, particularly in watershed areas (a situation not unrelated to poverty).
Local research has also shown a strong link between rural poverty and a high dependence on
agriculture. More than two-thirds of the poor, compared with 48 percent of the whole
population, reside in the rural areas.
2900000
2700000
2500000
Population
2300000
JAMAICA
2100000
1900000
1700000
1500000
1991 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Year
One of the fundamental shortfalls in the system is the fragmented nature of the planning
infrastructure. Currently, over 20 institutions are involved in planning (directly or indirectly)
and are governed by 103 pieces of planning-related legislation. These institutions are often times
characterized by inadequate capacity. At the systemic level, legislation and plans are outdated.
Many of the existing legislation were drafted when Jamaica was experiencing totally different
social and economic circumstances and growth was largely confined to the KMA and few
smaller urban centres. Planning approaches that worked in the 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s are
inadequate for today’s Jamaica. Jamaicans (developers and residents) are requesting new
choices of land use, housing, transport, employment and environment. The development of new
legislation is therefore required to reflect these changing demands. There is also a need for
better clarification of the roles of the various agencies involved in planning.
At the institution level, there is a shortage of trained staff (both numerically and in some
specialist areas); inadequate financial resources resulting in lack of equipment, vehicles and
personnel to effectively carry out post-permit monitoring and enforcement of regulations and
other requirements. This inadequate capacity also has far reaching implications for the
effectiveness the system as there is insufficient monitoring and little or no sanctioning for
breaches. In addition, there is inadequate communication between regulatory and development
agencies resulting in the persistent inability of the agencies to synchronize their plans and
planning activities. Very often, agencies responsible for major infrastructure development
works in housing, tourism, agriculture, and manufacturing plan and implement without any
consultation with other agencies. One example of this can be seen in the many incidents of
recently resurfaced roads being dug up by utility companies to install or replace infrastructure
(pipe, cables).
Another area of concern relates to the lengthy development approvals process. While the MLGE
indicated that the majority of development approvals have been granted in a 1-2-year and 2-3-
year time frame. Research has shown that development approvals have taken over 10 years to be
granted in some instances. Several reviews of the development approvals system are currently
underway to try and overcome the weaknesses in the system and shorten the processing time.
The examples cited above show a system characterized by a lack of robustness to respond to the
rate of development taking place in the country and the impacts of globalization. Further, the
slow responsiveness of the system creates opportunities for the system to be bypassed or
‘corrupted’. Development is seen by many as the construction of new infrastructure (highways,
hotels, housing schemes), which brings with it employment (often times short-term for most
unskilled workers) and contributes to the economy. As such, the system may be by-passed
leading to destruction of natural habitats and contamination of renewable resources in the drive
for physical and economic development.
Another effect of the weak planning system is the poor management of urban growth and
development. This has resulted in spatially unbalanced development. Approximately 25% of
Jamaica’s population live in Kingston and St Andrew and most development is concentrated in
and around the Kingston Metropolitan Region (KMR), which includes the Kingston
Metropolitan Area, parts of St. Thomas to the east and parts of St. Catherine to the west. A wide
disparity exists in levels of development between the KMA and other regional centres across the
country. In other words, these “other” urban centres, for the most part, are less attractive to
investors and residents. Even so, development outside the KMR is concentrated in other urban
centres, particularly parish capitals. Parish capitals, therefore, are the primary destinations of
intra-parish migration so that while a parish may show a net loss of population due to out-
migration, its capital (and major urban centres) may experience above average rates of growth.
Figure 3, which shows the percentage change in total and urban population by parish, indicates
that the urban population of all parishes with the exception of Kingston and St. Andrew, St.
James and St. Ann, have been growing at a faster rate than the population for the entire parish.
The Parish with the highest change was St. Catherine with a 38.61% change in total population
and a 42.47% change in urban population. Clarendon has a 14.35% and 27.76% change in total
and urban populations, respectively. The other major variations were noted in St. Elizabeth with
0.72% and 17.89% change and Trelawny with 3.68% and 13.24% change in total and urban
population, respectively. The urban centres accounting for the growth include Spanish Town,
Portmore and Old Harbour (St. Catherine); May Pen (Clarendon); Mandeville (Manchester);
Santa Cruz and Junction (St. Elizabeth); and Falmouth, Duncans, and Clarke’s Town (Trelawny).
See Table 2.
40
30
% Change
%Change in Total
20
Population
10
% Change in Urban
0 Population
St re r
at on
y
a er
St nd
Po as
e
w
.A n
Tr n n
St ry
tm ve
ch h
es
-10
St wn
. E lan
r in
St gs to
St dre
t
a
M abe
.C d
m
.A
es
e s no
am
.M
St ren
rtl
he
ho
el
n
W Ha
n
.J
liz
o
.T
Ki
an
Cl
Parish
Without the appropriate planning for the influx of residents to urban centres, there has been
uncontrolled and unplanned expansion of urban areas into surrounding areas (Urban sprawl).
Examples of this are the towns of Old Harbour, St. Catherine and May Pen, Clarendon, which
appear to be merging into one large urban centre (see Satellite Image). The rapid growth and
expansion (physical area) of the urban centres is usually accompanied by congestion as there is
greater dependence on automobiles as people live farther from their place of employment
(usually within the central business districts of urban centres).
Another pervasive issue is Squatting. It has largely resulted from the shortage of affordable land
and housing provisions to keep pace with population growth in the urban centres. In the absence
of affordable accommodation, squatting becomes a viable option to new arrivals to urban
centres. Squatting is of particular concern in Jamaica because of its rapid growth in especially
environmentally sensitive areas such as watersheds, flood plains and lands vulnerable to
landslides. Conservative estimates put the incidence of squatting at between 5 and 20% of the
housing stock. The Highway 2000 Corridor Plan, for example, indicates that squatting accounts
for 13% of the housing stock in St. Catherine and 19% in Clarendon. The preliminary findings of
a research project undertaken by the University of Technology in academic year 2002/03 put the
number of squatter settlement at 595 squatter settlements islandwide.
Squatters as well as developers who by-pass the planning system have also led to Uncontrolled
and haphazard developments, including illegal and fragmented subdivisions. These types of
developments are not only unsustainable but also lead to demand for additional services such as
sanitation, roads electricity and water and further extraction of critical resources.
The low level of public awareness is another pervasive issue contributing to uncontrolled
development. This is manifested in a high level of building and subdivision violations and
suggests there is a lack of basic understanding as to the benefits of planning.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
• Outdated and overlapping legislation
• Little link between plan preparation and
implementation process
• Institutional fragmentation and overlaps
• Lack of integrated planning
• Inadequate monitoring and enforcement
• Insufficient leadership in planning
• Tedious development approval process
• Ability of some institutions to disregard
regulations
• Inadequate infusion of planning at all levels of
the decision-making process
• Inadequate process and methodology for
preparing and updating development orders
• Inadequate planning for disasters
• Conflict between short term objectives and long
term planning
• Institutional fragmentation
• Insufficient documentation and dissemination of
information
• Inadequate cadre of planning professionals
• Lack of understanding of the benefits of planning
by the political directorate
• Inadequate resources both at national and local
levels for effective planning
• Inefficient use of appropriate tools for planning
Inadequate data and where data exists there is
difficulty in accessing
• Largely uncoordinated system
• Inconsistency in data collection and in collection
methodologies
• Limited use of technology to increase efficiency
and reduce transaction cost to the public
Opportunities Threats
• Local Sustainable Development Planning Framework • Limited pro-poor and inclusive planning
• Legislative Review • Corruption
• Public Sector Reform process • Emphasis on sectoral planning without
• Public Sector Modernization understanding the spatial framework
• Local Government Reform • National priorities that do not reflect urban and
• Planning with partners – e.g. PDC and parish councils regional planning (reflected in resources
• Availability of the AMANDA tracking system allocated to planning)
• The increasing availability of geospatial technology – • Restrictions that can imposed by international
GIS, Remote Sensing etc development partners
• The increasing availability of geospatial planning models • Political interference
– SMART, LSDP • Unconstrained power vested in the Minister
• Access to international financing • Pressures from expansion in the construction
• Advocacy by NGOs/environmental groups sector
• Modernization of the economy • Persistence of unbalanced regional development
• Declining poverty trend • Proneness to natural hazards
Vision Statement
The vision of urban and regional planning is to achieve:
Some key steps in the plan development process after May 31st includes:
1. Undertaking consultations of the first draft with key stakeholders to be identified by the
PIOJ, the Chair and the PAG
2. Development of an Action Plan – moving beyond initial strategies to the identification of
actions, timelines, indicators and targets and responsibility centres
3. Application of T215 - run scenarios with individual/combined policy variable changes
with T21; identify consistencies, and commence preparation of Second Draft Sector Plans
including long-term and short-term action plans; identify inconsistencies, which may be
caused by: resource constraints and/or unexpected interactions between variables
4. Submission of second draft of the sector plan by October 30th, 2007
5
The application of T21 will be used where applicable and the where the scenario and data exists.