Fiber Optic TR 108959

Fiber Optic Cables in
Overhead Transmission Corridors

A State-of-the-Art Review
TR-108959
Final Report, November 1997
Prepared by
J.A. Jones Power Delivery, Inc.
Post Office Box 187
Haslet, Texas 76052
Principal Investigators
M. Ostendorp
G. Gela
Prepared for
Electric Power Research Institute
3412 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
EPRI Project Manager
A. Hirany
Power Delivery Group
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED
OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF
EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM:
(A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE
USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT,
INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT
INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY,
OR (III) THAT THIS REPORT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR
(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY
OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS REPORT OR ANY INFORMATION,
APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT.
ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS REPORT
J.A. Jones Power Delivery, Inc.
ORDERING INFORMATION
Requests for copies of this report should be directed to the EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Coggins Drive, P.O. Box
23205, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, (510) 934-4212.
Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. EPRI. POWERING
PROGRESS is a service mark of the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.
Copyright 1997 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
REPORT SUMMARY
Many electric utilities are installing high capacity fiber optic cables and wires on their
high voltage lines to satisfy their own internal communication needs and to gain
additional revenues by leasing excess capacity to telecommunication network
providers. This report presents a review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in using
fiber optic technology in high voltage corridors.
Background
Within the power utility industry, reliable internal communications are vital to ensure
protection and control of the power system. With the advent of digital fault protection
systems, integrated power system automation signal densities are increasing; and fiber
optics can offer a unique solution to the ever increasing demand for bandwidth because
of its remarkably high capacity for carrying data -- single pair of fibers can carry nearly
8000 simultaneous voice channels. The immunity of fiber optics to electromagnetic
interference is another advantage. However, integrating fiber optic cables into highvoltage corridors also poses some technical and safety-related challenges.
Objectives
N
To identify and evaluate relevant technical information on using fiber optic cables in
high voltage corridors.
To summarize currently available technical information, applicable regulatory codes

and standards, state of practice of industry leaders, and current information and
technology gaps.
Approach
The project team conducted an exhaustive literature review on the integration of optic
technology into overhead power transmission lines. They summarized the state of
practice of fiber optic cables integration in high voltage corridors in the United States
power industry, including regulatory considerations, product descriptions, electrical
and mechanical factors, and issues related to installation, inspection, and maintenance.
iii
Results
In current practice, three different cable options are available to an electric utility that
elects to integrate communications into an existing power transmission system. Optical
fibers can be:
N
Encased within the ground wire (OPGW)
Wrapped around the phase conductor or the ground wire (WRAP)
Contained in an all-dielectric-self-supporting cable (ADSS)
For each option, the report gives typical material and installation costs for aerial cable
or wire with either 24 or 48 optical fibers. The cost of the cable/wire itself and the labor
required in the installation make up the majority of the system development cost.
The relatively new practice of integrating fiber optic cables into high voltage corridors
poses some technical and safety-related challenges. For example, since ADSS and
WRAP type fiber optic cables are located in high electric fields, there is a the threat of
sheath damage and cable failure similar to the aging of non-ceramic insulators. Also,
the high working tensions necessary for adequate ground clearance exposes the lightweight OPGW and self-supporting ADSS fiber optic cables to wind-induced vibrations
that can damage the cable and attachment hardware. The report summarizes current
experience with these and related problems and identifies technological issues that
remain to be addressed. The report includes an exhaustive set of references to the
technical literature.
EPRI Perspective
Besides providing a comprehensive introduction to the state of practice of integrating
fiber cable technology into high voltage transmission corridors, this report can be used
by EPRI members to identify subject areas and technological issues that need to be
addressed.
TR-108959
Interest Categories
Overhead construction, O&M
Overhead planning, analysis & design
Key Words
Fiber optic
All-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS)
Optical ground wire (OPGW)
Wrap type cables(WRAP)
Transmission line
iv
ABSTRACT
Overhead transmission power line corridors provide the telecommunications industry

with cost-effective alternative routes and at the same time benefit the electric utilities by
generating additional revenues using existing facilities. The inherent advantage of
fiber optic technology as a means of communication is that fiber optics provide fixed
link, point to point communications with a remarkably high capacity for carrying data.
For example, a single pair of fibers can carry nearly 8000 simultaneous voice channels.
Currently, fiber optics can be integrated into an overhead power transmission line in
four different ways. The optical fibers can be:
N
Encased within the Ground Wire (OPGW)
Encased within the Phase Conductor (OPPC)
Wrapped around the Phase Conductor or the Ground Wire (WRAP)
Contained in an All-Dielectric-Self-Supporting Cable (ADSS)
However, the practice of integrating fiber optic cables into high-voltage corridors also
poses some technical and safety related challenges. Since ADSS and WRAP type fiber
optic cables are located in high electric fields there is the threat of sheath damage and
cable failure similar to the phenomena related to aging of non-ceramic insulators. Also,
the high working tensions necessary for adequate ground clearance and minimum
amounts of self-damping expose the light-weight OPGW and self supporting ADSS
fiber optic cables to wind-induced vibration, which can damage the cables and
hardware.
Addressing these and other relevant issues, the Electric Power Research Institutes
(EPRI) advisory committee on fiber optics in utility corridors decided that it would be
beneficial to the member utilities to review and evaluate the current state-of-the-art.
Results of this investigation are summarized in this report.
vi
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1
1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................... 1-3
1.3 Literature Review ............................................................................................... 1-3
1.3.1 General ........................................................................................................ 1-4
1.3.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables .............................................. 1-8
1.3.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW).................................................................... 1-10
1.3.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP) .................................................... 1-11
2 STATE OF PRACTICE ............................................................................................. 2-1
2.1 Regulatory Considerations ................................................................................. 2-1
2.1.1 Analysis and Design Guidelines .................................................................. 2-1
2.1.2 Regulatory Codes and Standards................................................................ 2-1
2.1.3 Summary Evaluation.................................................................................... 2-2
2.2 Product Description ............................................................................................ 2-3
2.2.1 Manufacturers.............................................................................................. 2-4
2.2.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables .............................................. 2-5
2.2.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)...................................................................... 2-8
2.2.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP) .................................................... 2-13
2.2.5 Electrical Performance Specifications........................................................ 2-14
2.2.6 Mechanical Performance Specifications .................................................... 2-14
2.2.7 Summary Evaluation.................................................................................. 2-17
2.3 Electrical Considerations.................................................................................. 2-20
2.3.1 Placement.................................................................................................. 2-20
2.3.2 Electrical Modeling and Analysis ............................................................... 2-20
vii
2.3.3 Corona ....................................................................................................... 2-22

2.3.4 Insulation ................................................................................................... 2-23
2.3.5 Lightning Performance............................................................................... 2-25
2.3.6 Grounding .................................................................................................. 2-25
2.3.7 Live Working .............................................................................................. 2-26
2.3.8 Communication Equipment........................................................................ 2-27
2.4 Mechanical Considerations .............................................................................. 2-30
2.4.1 Placement.................................................................................................. 2-30
2.4.2 Structural Loads......................................................................................... 2-30
2.4.3 Mechanical Modeling and Analysis............................................................ 2-31
2.4.4 Cable and Wire Blow-Out .......................................................................... 2-31
2.4.5 Aeolian Vibration........................................................................................ 2-31
2.4.6 Galloping.................................................................................................... 2-32
2.5 Installation ........................................................................................................ 2-35
2.5.1 Equipment.................................................................................................. 2-37
2.5.2 Tensioning and Pulling Requirements ....................................................... 2-37
2.5.3 Pulling Lengths .......................................................................................... 2-38
2.5.4 Installation Methods................................................................................... 2-38
2.6 Inspection and Maintenance ............................................................................ 2-42
2.6.1 Types of Failures ....................................................................................... 2-42
2.6.2 Aging Effects.............................................................................................. 2-43
2.6.3 Inspection Methods and Tools................................................................... 2-43
2.6.4 Repair Methods and Tools......................................................................... 2-44
3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 3-1
3.1 All Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables..................................................... 3-2
3.2 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW) ............................................................................ 3-4
3.3 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)............................................................. 3-4
viii
4 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................... 4-1
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Correlation of Mechanical Load, Service Life, and Relative Humidity Typical Optical Fiber (Reference 32) .................................................................... 1-7
Figure 1-2 Typical ADSS Cable Load-Elongation Diagram (Reference 32) ................ 1-9
Figure 2-1 Loose Tube Buffered Fiber FRP Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4) .. 2-6
Figure 2-2 Central Maxi Tube Loose Fiber Aramide Reinforced ADSS Cable
(Reference 4)........................................................................................................ 2-6
Figure 2-3 Loose/Buffered Tube Messenger Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4). 2-6
Figure 2-4 Grooved/Hollow Glass Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4) ................. 2-7
Figure 2-5 Loose/Buffered Tube Glass Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4) ......... 2-7
Figure 2-6 Stranded Plastic Tubes - Plastic Sheath OPGW (Reference 4) ................. 2-9
Figure 2-7 Straight Plastic Maxi Tube - Plastic Sheath OPGW (Reference 4) .......... 2-10
Figure 2-8 Straight Plastic Tube - Spiraling Hollow Channel OPGW (Reference 4) .. 2-10
Figure 2-9 Stranded Plastic Tubes - Aluminum Tube OPGW (Reference 4)............. 2-10
Figure 2-10 Slotted Aluminum Spacer - Non Metallic Buffer Tubes OPGW
(Reference 4)...................................................................................................... 2-12
Figure 2-11 Grooved Aluminum Spacer - Aluminum Tube OPGW (Reference 4)..... 2-12
Figure 2-12 Thin Steel Tube OPGW (Reference 4)................................................... 2-12
Figure 2-13 WRAP Aerial Fiber Optic Cables (Reference 105) ................................. 2-13
xi
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Referenced Technical Publications ............................................................. 1-4
Table 1-2 Thermal Expansion Coefficients (Reference 105) ....................................... 1-6
Table 1-3 Conductor Creep Rates ............................................................................. 1-11
Table 2-1 Typical System Cost .................................................................................. 2-18
Table 2-2 Product Description Summary Evaluation ................................................. 2-19
Table 2-3 Electrical Considerations Summary Evaluation ......................................... 2-28
Table 2-4 Mechanical Considerations Summary Evaluation ..................................... 2-34
Table 2-5 Installation Considerations Summary Evaluation ...................................... 2-41
Table 2-6 Inspection and Maintenance Considerations Summary Evaluation........... 2-45
xiii
xiv
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
Within the power utility industry, reliable internal communications are vital to ensure
protection and control of the power system. Such communications traditionally have
been provided by methods such as power line carrier and microwave radio systems but
are more recently being supplemented or replaced by fiber optics. However, with the
advent of digital fault protection systems, integrated power system automation signal
densities are increasing and fiber optic communications can offer a unique solution to
the ever increasing demand in the future. Consequently, many electric utilities are
installing high capacity fiber optic cables and wires on their high voltage lines to satisfy
their own internal communication needs and to gain additional revenues by providing
excess capacity to telecommunication network providers.
Overhead transmission power line corridors provide the telecommunications industry
with cost-effective alternative routes and at the same time benefit the electric utilities by
generating additional revenues using existing facilities. The inherent advantage of
fiber optic technology as a means of communication is that fiber optics provide fixed
link, point to point communications with a remarkably high capacity for carrying data.
For example, a single pair of fibers can carry nearly 8000 simultaneous voice channels.
The immunity of fiber optics to electromagnetic interference is another advantage for
its use in power delivery systems as long as care is taken to shield any terminal and
repeater stations. Typically, there are no radiation or frequency assignment difficulties
as commonly experienced with power line carrier, intra-bundle, and microwave
communication systems. Also, fiber optics increase the security of the transmission
systems since the technology virtually eliminates the unauthorized monitoring of vital
communications. Last, fiber optics do not require coupling devices or other specialized
connectors and can be easily and cost-effectively integrated into any digital network.
Fiber optics can be currently integrated into an overhead power transmission line in
four different ways. The optical fibers can be:
N
Contained in an All-Dielectric-Self-Supporting Cable (ADSS)
Encased within the Ground Wire (OPGW)

1-1
Introduction
N
Encased within the Phase Conductor (OPPC)
Wrapped around the Phase Conductor or the Ground Wire (WRAP)
With the development of high strength-to-weight ratio insulating materials, ADSS

cables are currently becoming available that are suitable for overhead power lines with
span lengths of up to 1000 meter (3284 feet). In this embodiment, the ADSS cable is
often capable of maintaining the same mid span clearance to ground as the conductor
without tower reinforcement under governing wind and ice loading conditions. A
major advantage of the ADSS system is that it can be regarded as separate from the
power system and is therefore attractive to third party users such as telecommunication
providers.
Currently, there are a number of OPGW wires available that can be directly integrated
into existing transmission rights-of-way as replacements for traditional shield wires.
OPGW wires typically have the correct combination of flexibility and strength to
approximate the sag and tension characteristics of existing shield wire installations for
most span lengths. Consequently, the ease of integration into existing rights-of-way
makes this alternative to underbuild or wrapped cables very attractive to electric
utilities.
OPPC fiber optic cables have not been used extensively by North American utilities but
are in many ways very similar to OPGW fiber optic cables. Due to the difficulty
associated with the replacement and/or upgrade of the phase conductor with the
installed fiber optic cable (i.e., OPPC) the technology appears not to have gained a
foothold in American utility companies. Consequently, the discussion of OPPC fiber
optic cables has been excluded from this review.
WRAP fiber optic cables eliminate the need for specially shielded transition hardware
and can typically be installed economically without requiring any structural
modifications to the supports. Wind tunnel tests show that the wind load on the shield
wire or conductor typically increases no more than 10 percent for most wrapped fiber
optic cables resulting in little or no structural modifications. The ease of installation of
relatively inexpensive fiber optic cable in a very short time frame makes this option
attractive to telecommunication providers.
However, the relatively new practice of integrating fiber optic cables into high-voltage
corridors also poses some technical and safety related challenges. Since ADSS and
WRAP type fiber optic cables are located in high electric fields there is the threat of
sheath damage and cable failure similar to phenomena related to aging of non-ceramic
insulators. Also, the high working tensions necessary for adequate ground clearance
1-2
Introduction
expose the light-weight OPGW and self supporting ADSS fiber optic cables to windinduced vibration, which can damage the cable and attachment hardware.
Addressing these and other relevant issues, the Electric Power Research Institutes
(EPRI) advisory committee on fiber optics in utility corridors decided that it would be
beneficial to the member utilities to review and evaluate the current state-of-the-art.
Results of this investigation are summarized in this report.
1.2
Objectives
The goal of this report is to provide a critical and impartial review of the current stateof-the-art in using fiber optic technology in high voltage corridors. This document can
be used by the EPRI target member advisors to identify subject areas and technological
issues that need to be addressed. The main goals of this investigation are:
N
Identify and evaluate relevant technical information on using fiber optic technology
in high voltage corridors (establish State-of-the-Art) .
Summarize currently available technical information, applicable regulatory codes

and standards, state of practice of leaders in the industry, and current information
and technology gaps.
1.3
Literature Review
A survey of existing information revealed that there are a large number of publications
(i.e., more than 100) dealing with OPGW and ADSS fiber optic aerial cables and related
technical matters, while there are only a few that deal exclusively with WRAP
installations. Most of the reference material that is relevant to the installation of fiber
optic cables in transmission corridors addresses cable construction, cable testing,
connection splicing, aeolian vibration, tracking, and dry band arcing. References are
presented in Section 4 of this report.
Table 1-1 shows a summary of the 123 references sorted with respect to different
aspects of fiber optic technology. The table differentiates between general, electrical,
mechanical, and operational categories. These categories are subdivided further to
distinguish between guidelines, regulatory codes, and manufacturer issues in the
general category; the ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP type fiber optic cables and wires in the
electrical and mechanical category; and installation, and inspection and maintenance
oriented information in the operational category. However, many of the references and
publications address multiple aspects of the technology and are listed in each
applicable category.
1-3
Introduction
Table 1-1
Referenced Technical Publications
Applicable References & Publications

(See Section 4)
Guidelines
Regulatory
2, 3
Manufacturers
4, 5
ADSS
General
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
30, 31, 32, 33
Electrical
OPGW
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41
42, 43
WRAP
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 30, 32, 33
44, 45, 46, 47
ADSS
7, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 31, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71
Mechanical
OPGW
7, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79
WRAP
7, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62
63, 64, 68, 70, 80, 81
Installation
Operation
7, 20, 22, 23, 25, 49, 60, 61, 64, 73, 79, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94
95, 96, 97, 98, 99
Inspection
18, 37, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115
& Maintenance
116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123
Rather than summarizing and discussing the information documented in each

publication in detail, it was deemed more beneficial to provide a short description to
highlight the pertinent information contained in the referenced publications. These
descriptions are provided in the following sections.
1.3.1 General
In the process of optimizing the construction, installation, and operation of ADSS,
OPGW, and WRAP fiber optic cables it is important to follow a continuous quality
1-4
Introduction
improvement loop (7, 9, 18). The quality improvement loop typically addresses the
theoretical and practical requirements, general parameters of the cable design and the
selection of materials, the process control used in the production, the verification tests
to be performed in the laboratory prior to installation in the field, the monitoring of
field installations during the installation process, and evaluation of the long term
performance during the service life of the components.
A tensile force is present throughout the full service life of ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP
aerial cables. This tensile force causes the cable to elongate which needs to be
considered in each step of the cable selection, installation, and operation. The total
elongation of an aerial cable is typically divided into three different parts:
N
A constant elongation strongly influenced by the unit weight, span length, sag, and
mechanical characteristics of the aerial fiber optic cable or wire.
A variable elongation that depends on the environmental conditions at the time of

measurement such as wind velocity, ice load, and temperature variations acting on
the aerial fiber optic cable or wire.
Creep of the strength members and/or strands of the aerial fiber optic cable or wire
caused by long term presence of tensile loads.
To restrict the cable or wire elongation to an acceptable level during the service life of
the component, a strength member system has to be used that exhibits a sufficiently
high modulus of elasticity in combination with a low unit mass and a small outside
diameter that is capable of housing a satisfactory number of optical fibers (2, 8).
Additionally, a good cable or wire design eliminates any axial strains to the optical
fibers for all loading conditions that the aerial cable or wire may experience. Most
aerial cables and wires in the past have typically been designed by the manufacturer to
optimize one or the other aspect resulting in somewhat standardized designs that are
currently offered for use in high voltage corridors.
ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables and wires are exposed to much more extreme
temperature variations than any other non-aerial cable types, sometimes encountering
temperature variations of up to 100GC (212GF). However, due to the low thermal
expansion coefficients of cable and wire wrapping and filler material in combination
with relatively high moduli of elasticity, the cable expansion is typically dominated by
the characteristics of the strength member (i.e., steel, aluminum, or composite strands).
A completely different situation may exist for non-metallic cables during low
temperature storage on drums. Some composite strength members are not capable of
absorbing any axial compression forces. These composite strength members require
that the static coefficient of friction within a length of cable be larger than the force
arising from the differences in thermal potential. This will prevent the respective layers
1-5
Introduction
from sliding relative to each other. Table 1-2 shows coefficients of thermal expansion
for materials commonly used in the construction of aerial fiber optic cables.
Coefficients of thermal expansion are shown for the fiber reinforced glass (FRP),
polyester, polyethylene (PE), aramide yarns, and high density polyethylene (HDPE).
Table 1-2
Thermal Expansion Coefficients (Reference 105)
cable element
material
thermal
coefficient
of expansion
(10-6K-1)
central strength
member
FRP
stranded tubes
Polyester
80
PE
150
aramide
yarns
-2.0
HDPE
150
inner-sheath
strength members
outer-sheath
5.0
The life of optical fibers is determined by the mechanical stress level in the fiber and
the amount of moisture (i.e., relative humidity) present at the surface of the fiber as
shown in Figure 1-1. Consequently, ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables are
constructed to minimize the ingress of moisture and level of stress to reduce the rate of
deterioration of the optical fibers. Typically, stresses are controlled through the use of
stranded loose tubes that allow for a certain amount of free cable or wire elongation
without elongation of the optical fibers, while moisture ingress is controlled through
the presence of the inner and outer sheath (i.e., ADSS and WRAP) or by the tube (i.e.,
OPGW). Ideally, the bending radius for most optical fibers should never be less than
approximately 60 mm (2.5 inches) to prevent stresses that would otherwise damage
most optical fibers (i.e., bending radius of 85 mm (3.5 inches) for 1550 nm fiber). This
minimum bending radius corresponds to a maximum stress of 0.075 Mpa (11psi).
Cable and wire cores are typically standardized to include specific numbers of tubes
that each contain one or more optical fibers. Optical fibers used in past installations of
aerial cables and wires have been either single-mode or multi-mode. However,
completely custom made cables have been designed in the past by either the customer
or manufacturer in accordance with mechanical, electrical, and optical specifications
most suitable to a particular transmission line application.
1-6
Introduction
Figure 1-1
Correlation of Mechanical Load, Service Life, and Relative Humidity - Typical Optical
Fiber (Note: 1Gpa = 145ksi, Reference 32)
It is important that the polyethylene enclosure (i.e., for ADSS and WRAP) or aluminum
enclosure (i.e., for OPGW) of aerial fiber optic cables be resistant against weathering,
UV radiation, acid rain, and the influence of electric fields. Additionally, the outer
enclosure should have:
N
High mechanical strength to guarantee excellent performance of the cable or wire

when exposed to extreme loading conditions.
Very low water permeability (i.e., low hydraulic conductivity).
Adequate carbon black content to protect against thermal oxidation of ADSS and
WRAP sheaths and corrosion resistance for OPGW tubes.
High thermal stress cracking resistance to protect ADSS and WRAP aerial cables
against thermal oxidation.
High resistance against corona and tracking to protect ADSS and WRAP sheaths
from the effects of high electric fields.
Tests are typically used to evaluate the electrical and mechanical performance of ADSS,
OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables. These tests evaluate the tensile performance and
ultimate strength of the cable or wire, the impact resistance of the construction, static
and cyclic bending strength of the cable or wire, thermal cycling performance,
1-7
Introduction
resistance to water penetration, creep strain and rate, vibration self damping
characteristics, vibration damper performance, resistance to shotgun damage, and
lightning resistance. A more detailed description of the types of tests typically
performed on ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP type aerial fiber optic cables and wires can be
found in applicable Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standards
and specifications (1, 2, 3), as discussed in Section 2 of this report.
1.3.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables

Typically, strength members of ADSS aerial cables are fabricated from high strength
fiber glass filaments bonded in resin or Aramide yarn filaments. The effective elasticity
modulus of high strength glass filaments bonded in resins (FRP) is about 50 kN/mm2
(7.25b106psi) with a specific mass of approximately 2000 kg/m3 (125 lbs/ft3). The
stiffness and complete lack of relaxation of FRP strength elements permanently
maintain bending and torsion stresses and make the material sensitive to fatigue and
may, depending on the type of glass, be sensitive to moisture. Moisture sensitive
strength elements are likely to loose integrity and strength within the fiberglass matrix.
The modulus of elasticity of Aramide yarn filaments used in ADSS aerial cables is
2
6
3
approximately 100 kN/mm (14.5b10 psi) for a specific mass density of only 1450 kg/m
3
(90 lbs/ft ). Therefore, compared with the FRP strength member, the cable elongation,
weight, and diameter of an ADSS aerial cable reinforced with Aramide yarn filaments
are significantly lower.
Load-elongation relationships for ADSS cables are significantly different from
comparable values for traditional ground wires and phase conductors since they vary
substantially with the cable design. The difference between the free cable elongation
and the cable elongation at maximum load should be at least 0.2 % (i.e., the length of
the fibers should be at least 1.02 times the length of the tube), taking into account the
long term creep of Aramide yarns, the variation in excess fiber length in the loose tube,
and the initial cable elongation. An example of typical load-elongation test results as a
function of span and sag is shown in Figure 1-2 for two different ADSS cables.
The selection of ADSS aerial cable materials should be performed on the basis of two
main criteria: a) technical performance; b) long term stability and aging resistance. The
technical performance of OPGW wires is very similar to the performance of similarly
constructed ground wires and phase conductors, while the technical performance of
ADSS aerial cables is strongly influenced by the type of materials used, the high and
low temperature behavior, and the coefficient of thermal expansion of the cable.
1-8
Introduction
Figure 1-2
Typical ADSS Cable Load-Elongation Diagram (Reference 32)
Discharge mechanisms resulting from long term exposure to high electrical stresses
contribute to the aging of the outer sheath on ADSS aerial cables. Generally, the two
contributing mechanisms are caused by:
N
Corona (i.e., luminous and audible partial discharges in a non-uniform electric

field)
Tracking or Dry-Banding (i.e., the process that produces localized deterioration and
conducting paths as a result of the action of electric discharges on or close to the
insulating surface)
Typically, the ADSS aerial cable is grounded at the suspension towers while it is
charged by capacitive coupling in the middle of the span. As a result of the capacitive
charge, the ADSS cable will have a potential that depends on the phase voltage and the
position of the cable relative to the phase conductors and ground wire(s). Since the
surface electrical resistivity of the ADSS aerial cable is very high, the outer insulation
layer of the ADSS is not an equipotential surface and the resulting axial voltage
gradients produce potential differences between the ADSS cable and the grounded
hardware on the support structures.
The resulting electric field strength at the tips of the pre-formed attachment hardware
is likely to produce corona (8, 9, 11) that may lead to failure of the ADSS aerial cable in
a relatively short time period (i.e., observed time to failure ranges from two months to
1-9
Introduction
twelve months). This problem can be reduced significantly by the use of plastic
attachment hardware instead of the traditional metal pre-formed hardware, but cannot
be totally eliminated. Of course, the most effective way of avoiding excessive induced
voltages is to place the ADSS cable in locations with a low electric field or low space
potential. Typically, locations with field strengths not exceeding 15-25 kV/cm or a
space potential of 15-20 kV are suitable for the installation of ADSS aerial cables.
Plastic spiral vibration dampers (SVD) must be installed at least 3 meters (10 feet) or
more from the armor rod to prevent degradation of the components as a result of
tracking. Ideally, spiral vibration dampers should be placed in electric fields not
exceeding 2 kV/cm to minimize degradation of the components.
Also, whenever an ADSS aerial cable is polluted and wet, a low magnitude current is
likely to flow from the middle of the span to the suspension tower (8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16,
17). Wherever there are locations of higher current density caused by non-uniform
pollution or wetting, local evaporation may take place due to current heating and dry
bands are formed. The dry bands are stressed electrically to the point of breakdown
and localized arcing occurs across the dry bands. The arcing can degrade the ADSS
cable installation both, due to the energy involved in the arc and due to the chemical
action of the arc products. This process can be continuous in some weather conditions
and can cause the ADSS cable to fail in a relatively short time (i.e., observed time to
failure ranges from two months to ten months).
1.3.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)

Creep rates and strains for OPGW aerial cables are similar to values observed for phase
conductors. Typical creep rates in percent elongation for different types of conductors
are shown in Table 1-3. However, OPGW aerial cables are typically installed at an
elevated tension to maintain NESC minimum clearance requirements on an existing
right-of-way which may accelerate the rate of creep in the aluminum strands. At the
same time, an increase in stringing tension will decrease the fatigue resistance and selfdamping of the OPGW which in turn reduces the service life.
OPGW aerial cables are typically placed at the top of structures and thus experience
lightning strikes and short-circuit currents. Core temperatures, under the passage of
short circuit currents, can reach temperatures in excess of 100GC (212GF) which
typically results in annealing of the aluminum components. It is important that there is
no significant change in the optical attenuation of the optical fibers under these
conditions.
Since the majority of these energy transients are caused by fault currents, it is necessary
to take the maximum available fault current and the duration of the fault into account
in the selection of the OPGW aerial wire. Consequently, it is important to correctly
identify the fault level of the system to select the most suitable OPGW wire. OPGW
1-10
Introduction
aerial wires are typically rated using the maximum I2t value. Also, it appears that the
fault current testing stipulated in IEEE Standard 1138 is not representative of the use of
OPGW aerial wires in the field. It can be argued that a full asymmetric fault lasting for
30 cycles is difficult to find at the average utility and almost impossible to produce
under laboratory conditions. Our experience shows that faults are mostly symmetrical
(i.e., if DC offset does occur it usually decays in 1 to 2 cycles). Consequently, as long as
the I2t rating is verified the shape of the simulated fault is unimportant.
Protection of the fibers against lightning strikes is provided by the outer layer of the
OPGW or the metal layer of the fiber optic cable, which should be at least 2 mm (5/64
inch) thick. The fiber itself can tolerate very high temperatures, but thermal
performance of plastic tubes, fiber coatings and aluminum or aluminum coated steel
wires needs to be carefully considered.
Table 1-3
Conductor Creep Rates
Typical Creep Rates of 795-kcmil Electrical Conductor
Tension @ 15% UTS
Tension @ 25% UTS
(10yrs)
Note:
(30yrs)
(10yrs)
(20yrs)
(30yrs)
(%)
ACSR
AAAC
AAC
ACAR
AW
EHS
HS
(20yrs)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
0.050
0.075
0.101
0.081
0.010
0.008
0.009
0.056
0.084
0.114
0.091
0.011
0.008
0.010
0.060
0.090
0.121
0.097
0.012
0.009
0.011
0.097
0.146
0.198
0.158
0.019
0.015
0.017
0.109
0.164
0.221
0.177
0.022
0.016
0.020
0.116
0.174
0.236
0.189
0.023
0.017
0.021
Creep rates in percent elongation

All creep rates derived for operation at room temperature (i.e., 68GF)
1.3.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)

Similar to ADSS aerial cables, the selection of WRAP aerial cable materials should be
performed on the basis of the same two main criteria: a) technical performance; b) long
term stability and aging resistance. Since the WRAP type aerial cable is essentially an
ADSS cable without a strength member (i.e., with the exception of the method of
installation), many of the experiences with the ADSS cables apply also to WRAP type
fiber optic cables. Consequently, the use of WRAP type fiber optic cables faces many of
the same challenges of an ADSS installation.
The application of WRAP aerial cables is typically limited by the surface electric field
gradients on the overhead ground wires as well as the conductors. In the past,
installations of WRAP aerial cables were typically limited to applications on wires with
surface gradients limited to less than 10 kV/cm. Typically, it is assumed that surface
1-11
Introduction
gradients in excess of 15 to 20 kV/cm significantly deteriorate the cable jacket as a

result of surface corona and noticeably affect the economic life of the installation.
1-12
2
STATE OF PRACTICE
2.1
Regulatory Considerations
Standards are typically provided to assist both manufacturers and users of a specific
technology in providing a common understanding of production and performance
requirements. Standards applicable to the high-voltage transmission industry
discussed in the following sections are the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), the
standards and guides developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE), and the standards mandated by the International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC). It should be understood that there are also a number of other standardizing
bodies involved in this particular technology that address subjects such as quality
control and communication protocols. In addition, individual utilities and states
develop their own regulations in certain areas of the industry. However, a discussion
of these related standards is beyond the scope of this document.
2.1.1 Analysis and Design Guidelines

Currently there are no general analysis and design guidelines that specifically address
ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial fiber optic cables in high voltage corridors. However,
there are a number of related American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and IEEE
guides and standards that address individual aspects such as the calculation of wind
loads on the cable or wire, calculation of sags and tensions, lightning performance (i.e.,
OPGW wires), insulation performance, reliability requirements and maintenance
issues.
2.1.2 Regulatory Codes and Standards

The NESC C2 National Electrical Safety Code (3) is the primary regulatory document that
addresses most electrical and mechanical aspects dealing with the design, installation,
and operation of equipment in high voltage corridors. In particular, the NESC
document addresses grounding methods, minimum clearances and approach distances,
structural loading, mechanical strength requirements, safety rules for installation, and
maintenance. However, a detailed description of the rules and specifications addressed
in the NESC C2 standard is not included in this report.
2-1
State of Practice
The IEEE Standard 1138-1994 IEEE Standard Construction of Composite Fiber Optic Ground
Wire (OPGW) for Use on Electric Utility Power Lines (2) addresses the construction of
OPGW aerial wires. The IEEE Draft P1222 Standard All-Dielectric Self-Supporting Fiber
Optic Cable (ADSS) for Use on Overhead Utility Lines (not yet published) includes a
variety of tests to evaluate the performance of non-metallic aerial optical cable under
laboratory conditions. Standardized tests evaluate the transmission, mechanical, and
electrical performance of the cables and include among others, tracking resistance,
galloping, and aeolian vibration tests. Most of the tests included in the standard are
very much aligned with the standard tests typically performed on OPGW aerial wires,
which are significantly different in construction from ADSS and WRAP aerial cables.
While the current draft standard addresses minimum performance requirements, it
does not address analysis, design, or installation issues of using aerial fiber optical
cables and wires in high voltage corridors.
At the international level, the IEC and related bodies provide standards that address
optical fibers, aerial cables, connectors, couplers, switches, relays, and others. IEC
Technical Committee 86A (TC 86A) covers the development of recommendations for
optical fibers and cables while TC 86 B addresses fiber optic interconnecting devices
and passive components. At the same time, IEC publication 793 establishes a set of
uniform requirements for the geometrical, optical, transmission, mechanical, and
environmental properties of optical fibers that are used in telecommunication
equipment.
IEC publication 794 covers the manufacturing and performance of fiber optic cables.
The first part contains measurement methods to determine mechanical and
environmental characteristics. The second part describes single fiber cables for indoor
use with applications such as transmission equipment, telephone equipment, data
processing equipment, and communication and transmission networks. Finally, the
third part of the publication regulates construction issues, acceptable dimensions, and
packaging.
The IEC also has standards for related equipment such as attenuators, connectors,
switches, and splices. IEC publication 869 describes the optical, mechanical, and
environmental test and measurement methods used for the evaluation of optical
attenuators. IEC 874 describes requirements for optical detachable connectors. IEC 875
specifies minimum requirements for optical branching devices that typically do not
contain opto-electronic or other transducing elements. Last, IEC publication 876
describes minimum performance requirements and optical, mechanical, and
environmental test methods for fiber optic switches.
2.1.3 Summary Evaluation

Currently, it appears that there are no comprehensive fiber optic technology application
guidelines that can be used by electric utility engineers as reference documents for the
2-2
State of Practice
integration of aerial fiber optic cables or wires into high voltage corridors. Based on the
review, it appears that a significant amount of information and utility experience exists
in the literature. Unfortunately, the majority of the information is distributed through a
large amount of reference material that makes it extremely difficult and time
consuming for most utility engineers to use the information productively in todays
competitive business environment.
2.2
Product Description
Optical fibers provide the communications medium of aerial fiber optic cables and
wires. By its very nature, optical fibers are extremely fragile when drawn into a hairlike strand. In order to operate as a reliable high quality component, the fiber must be
free of impurities and protected from mechanical stresses.
An optical fiber is composed of a light guiding core surrounded by cladding. Both the
core and the cladding are typically made of high purity glass typically derived from
doped germanium or pure silica. The core and the cladding are then surrounded by
one or two protective coatings of Acrylate that improves the strength characteristics of
the optical fibers.
Two main types of optical fiber exist: a) single mode; b) multi mode. In a single mode
optical fiber, the fiber core is small enough that only one mode of light can travel
through the core at any one time. In a multi mode fiber, the fiber core is large enough
that multiple modes of light can travel through the core at different paths and lengths.
It should be noted that the attenuation of the signal in single mode is significantly
lower than in multi mode fibers. Consequently, in power utilities, where fiber optic
systems are usually point to point over large distances, single mode fibers are preferred
since they require substantially fewer repeater stations which reduces the cost of a
communication system significantly. Additionally, single mode fiber also has a higher
data transmission capacity than multi mode fiber.
When combined with a method of construction suitable to the high strength, high
voltage environment of utility corridors, aerial fiber optic cables and wires provide
superior performance and reliability in communication networks because:
N
Fiber optic communication cables are neither subject to electromagnetic interference

nor do they cause any interference.
Aerial fiber optic cables and any related equipment can be electrically insulated
from system components.
The technology offers very long information transmission distances of up to 80 km

(50 miles) without requiring the use of repeaters.
2-3
State of Practice
N
Fiber optic technology offers extremely high transmission capacity which can result
in data transfer of information at rates of up to 3 gigabytes per second (Gbps).
2.2.1 Manufacturers
There are a number of manufacturers (i.e., an attempt was made to identify suppliers of
major presence in the North American marketplace; no attempt has been made to
provide a complete list of all suppliers) that currently produce aerial fiber optic ADSS,
OPGW, and WRAP cables that can be used in high voltage corridors. These
manufacturers, listed in alphabetical order, are:
N
Alcoa-Fujikura, Ltd.
BICC Cables
Brugg Telecom
FOCAS, Inc.
Lucent Fitel/Phillips Fitel Technologies
SIECOR Corporation
SIMPLEX Technologies
Alcoa-Fujikura, Ltd. is a total systems provider of passive fiber optic products to the
telecommunication, cable TV, electric utility, and data communication industries. The
company was founded in 1985 and constitutes a joint venture between Alcoa, Inc., and
Fujikura Limited. Alcoa-Fujikura, Ltd provides fiber optic cables, fusion splicers,
connectors, accessories, and engineering and support services.
The BICC Cables group is an international business conglomerate providing products
and services for infrastructure development in power, communications, building, and
transport. In the past, BICC has produced cables for energy, telecommunications,
electronic, and high-performance aerospace and defense applications.
The Brugg Telecom group of companies have manufactured cables since 1896, situated
in the Swiss town of Brugg just west of Zurich, Switzerland. Brugg Telecom has
manufactured fiber optic cables since the early eighties at various locations including
Switzerland, United States of America, Australia, and Israel.
FOCAS Inc, originally founded as a division of Raychem Corporation, is currently a
division of the Cookson Group, a multi-national materials company headquartered in
England and the United States of America. FOCAS offers a wide variety of ADSS,
OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables designed for use in high voltage corridors.
2-4
State of Practice
Lucent Fitel/Phillips Fitel Technologies, two companies of the Fitel group,

headquartered in North America, are manufacturers of fiber optic cable and wire.
Lucent Fitel manufactures loose tube technology ADSS cables and related accessories,
while Phillips Fitel manufactures OPGW wires and related accessories for long distance
carriers, electric utilities, municipal, state, and government entities, and private
networks.
SIECOR Corporation, founded in 1977, is a manufacturer of fiber optic cables and
accessories for voice, data, and video communication applications. SIECOR is
headquartered in Hickory, North Carolina, and owned equally by Corning Inc. and
Siemens Corporation. SIECOR Corporation provides a broad offering of aerial fiber
optic cables and accessories for installation of communication systems in high voltage
corridors.
SIMPLEX Technologies is a wholly owned subsidiary of TYCO International, Limited.
and has been involved in technology development and product manufacturing for over
150 years. Today, SIMPLEX Technologies is mainly involved in communication
technology including the manufacturing of all types of aerial fiber optic cables.
2.2.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables

ADSS cables must be designed with sufficient tensile strength to maintain minimum
clearances and protect the optical fibers from external stresses and strains throughout
the predicted service life (7, 8, 101). Consideration must be given to long term fatigue
and creep. The support element of ADSS aerial cables is typically glass, Aramide fiber,
or both (see Figure 2-1 through 2-3). Metallic strength elements may also be used in
other self-supporting aerial cables but are typically not recommended where a
parallelism exists between the routes of communication and the power supply cables
due to the induction potential on the aerial cable from the phase conductors.
Due to the light weight and high-strength-to-weight ratio, ADSS aerial cables can be
utilized on very long spans (i.e., up to 1000 m or 3284 feet) for most climatic loading
conditions. The number of optical fibers in ADSS cables is typically higher than the
number of optical fibers in OPGW or WRAP aerial cables. Fiber counts usually vary
between 24 to 48 fibers for most long distance applications, while local area loops may
have fiber counts of up to 288 for ADSS and 144 for OPGW aerial cable. Optical fibers
may be bundled, formed into ribbons or individually housed in loose buffer tubes or
slots to provide adequate mechanical protection. Typically, the tubes or slots are filled
with grease to protect the optical fibers from water penetration.
2-5
State of Practice
Figure 2-1
Loose Tube Buffered Fiber FRP Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4)
Figure 2-2
Central Maxi Tube Loose Fiber Aramide Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4)
Figure 2-3
Loose/Buffered Tube Messenger Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4)
2-6
State of Practice
There are a number of different construction methods used to produce ADSS aerial
cables. Figure 2-1 shows an ADSS cable consisting of loose tube buffered fibers
stranded around a glass fiber reinforced plastic core surrounded by the inner sheath.
Stranded glass or Aramide fibers are applied beneath the outer sheath. Figure 2-2
shows an ADSS cable consisting of a central maxi tube accommodating up to about 24
loosely housed optical fibers. Typically, fibers are inserted into the maxi tube in the
manufacturing process with an overlength to avoid excessive fiber stresses.
Figure 2-4
Grooved/Hollow Glass Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4)
Figure 2-3 shows an ADSS cable with a loose or tightly buffered optical bundle
supporting by a stranded glass or Aramide messenger wire. Typically, the optical unit
is connected to the messenger wire at intervals with molded sheath stays.
Figure 2-5
Loose/Buffered Tube Glass Reinforced ADSS Cable (Reference 4)
Figure 2-4 shows an ADSS aerial cable made of a grooved or hollow glass fiber
reinforcing rod surrounded by an outer sheath. The optical fibers are typically
embedded in an optical fiber ribbon that rests in the groove of the reinforcing rod.
2-7
State of Practice
Figure 2-5 shows an ADSS aerial cable that consists of multiple glass or Aramide
strength members and loose tube buffered fiber cables stranded together inside the
outer sheath. Typically, this design process shows to be very flexible which makes it
most suitable for applications that require a small turning radius.
2.2.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)

In composite conductors a fiber cable unit containing the optical fibers is either
integrated or embedded into a conductor or ground wire. In voltages below 138-kV the
composite conductor can also be a phase wire (i.e., as previously mentioned, the
discussion of Optical Phase Conductor (OPPC) is not included in this report).
However, usually the fiber unit containing the optical fibers is placed inside the ground
wire. This type of construction is called an Optical Ground Wire (i.e., OPGW).
OPGW can be a light weight ground wire designed to be used as a static wire
replacement or it can be installed in addition to conventional ground wire. The
mechanical and electrical requirements for OPGW aerial wires are very similar to
requirements for comparable conventional ground wires. Currently, the number of
optical fibers that can be readily fitted into an OPGW aerial wire construction can reach
up to 144 fibers.
OPGW aerial wires can be differentiated in various ways. The most common way to
differentiate between the different types includes: a) loose versus tight buffering; b)
solid core versus tubular core; c) fibers inside metallic tube versus fibers inside plastic
tube (i.e., closed versus open construction). Metallic tubes are either welded or
extruded while plastic tubes are always extruded. In some OPGW constructions
several tubes are stranded over a strength element while other constructions favor a
single tubular core. Fibers inside the tube are either loosely or tightly buffered.
Typically, in OPGW aerial cables that are subjected to environmental as well as fault
current induced stresses the packing of the optical fiber is an essential factor. The
advantage of tight buffering is the construction of a small overall conductor diameter,
while the advantage of loose buffering is that the optical fibers are not subjected to
tensile stresses typically caused by conductor elongation.
Metallic tubes provide a hermetic protection against water and hydrogen penetration.
However, if there is any hydrogen generation on the inside of the tube the moisture is
also unable to evaporate. In plastic tube constructions, the possible effects of water and
hydrogen have to be mitigated through the selection of the materials such as tape and
filler compounds. Typically, the tubes are filled with compound material for water and
vibration protection. However, in some constructions the optical fibers or tubes are
isolated from direct contact with metallic current carrying parts. Often, plastic tubes
are faster and easier from an installation point of view and the unit can be used as a
cable itself inside buildings.
2-8
State of Practice
The metallic wires have to give the OPGW aerial cable enough conductivity to carry
fault currents, and the strength to withstand mechanical stresses. Therefore, aluminum,
aluminum alloy, galvanized steel, aluminum clad steel wires or a combination of any of
them are typically used. Two armoring layers can be used to prevent the effects of
residual torsion from the laying of the strands, while if a single layer is used it is
recommended to use an anti-rotation device during installation. At the same time, the
use of two layers of stranding results in a smaller temperature change in the ground
wire as a result of a fault current or lightning strike.
The OPGW aerial wire shown in Figure 2-6 takes advantage of plastic tube construction
in which the optical fibers are placed loosely with overlength. This particular cable
design is relatively sensitive to temperature changes and has a relatively low crush
resistance. However, in most cases it is possible to reverse any deformations incurred
on the aerial wire. The maximum number of optical fibers for this construction is
typically limited to 12 fibers.
Figure 2-6
Stranded Plastic Tubes - Plastic Sheath OPGW (Reference 4)
The OPGW in Figure 2-7 demonstrates a typical maxi tube design in which the fibers
are housed loosely with overlength. This design typically requires a very sticky
compound to avoid fiber and compound movement that can make the compound
unworkable in low temperature conditions. Crush resistance is usually relatively low
but deformations are reversible once they occur. Fiber counts of up to 48 fibers are
possible and splicing is usually achieved quickly.
Figure 2-8 shows a later evolution of an OPGW construction incorporating a straight
plastic tube. The hollow channel is shaped in a spiral inside the tube to emulate
stranding. Optical fibers are usually loosely housed and the oval channel is filled with
2-9
State of Practice
Figure 2-7
Straight Plastic Maxi Tube - Plastic Sheath OPGW (Reference 4)
Figure 2-8
Straight Plastic Tube - Spiraling Hollow Channel OPGW (Reference 4)
Figure 2-9
Stranded Plastic Tubes - Aluminum Tube OPGW (Reference 4)
2-10
State of Practice
a compound. As a result of the small channel, a filling compound can be used that
exhibits a good temperature range eliminating the problems associated with the design
shown in Figure 2-7 (i.e., sticky compound). Controlled optical fiber overlength (i.e.,
the length of fibers in excess of the strength member length) of up to 48 fibers is
obtained by the biasing of the fiber and the stranding. The crush resistance of this
particular design is usually high and deformations are reversible in most cases.
The OPGW design shown in Figure 2-9 is characteristic of the original OPGW design
that combines the use of stranded plastic tubes and a central aluminum tube. The
stranded plastic tubes containing the optical fibers are loosely housed inside an
aluminum tube but can also be stranded around a central element. Tubes are usually
filled with a compound and fiber overlength is controlled through biasing and
stranding. Typically, crush resistance is relatively high but deformations are
irreversible and collapse of the tube is possible if minimum bending radius of wire is
not carefully maintained. Fiber counts of up to 36 fibers are typical but the splicing
process is relatively slow.
The OPGW aerial wire design shown in Figure 2-10 utilizes a central helically grooved
core of aluminum surrounding compound filled plastic buffer tubes that contain the
primary coated optical fibers. Typically, the optical fibers are not strained since they
move radialy whenever the conductor changes length. This type of design has a very
high crush resistance and is relatively easy to splice. This design allows for very high
fiber counts with diameters comparable to traditional ground wires.
The OPGW in Figure 2-11 has a grooved or slotted aluminum spacer in which optical
fibers are packed inside compound filled grooves. Typically, the fibers are packed
relatively tight (i.e., little or no overlength). However, with low fiber counts it is also
possible to pack the fibers loosely. Crush resistance is usually very high but
deformations can not be reversed once they occur. Fiber counts of up to 48 fibers are
possible, but the aluminum tube and spacer can get very hot during a fault which may
require special fiber coatings.
The OPGW aerial wire in Figure 2-12 utilizes loosely packed optical fibers inside thin,
small diameter compound filled steel tube(s). Typically, the steel tubes are welded and
the optical fibers are inserted with overlength. The crush resistance of these OPGW
wires is relatively good, but any deformations are irreversible. Splicing of the cable is
efficient and the use of the aluminum strands prevents significant temperature changes
as a result of a fault.
2-11
State of Practice
Figure 2-10
Slotted Aluminum Spacer - Non Metallic Buffer Tubes OPGW (Reference 4)
Figure 2-11
Grooved Aluminum Spacer - Aluminum Tube OPGW (Reference 4)
Figure 2-12
Thin Steel Tube OPGW (Reference 4)
2-12
State of Practice
2.2.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)

WRAP aerial fiber optic cables can be fastened to or wrapped around the existing phase
or ground wire as shown in Figure 2-13. Typically, the wrapping-type system is the
only system still used in todays installation of communication networks. These fiber
optic cables are usually lightweight since they rely on the strength of the conductor or
ground wire for support. The number of fibers typically used in WRAP aerial cables
ranges from 6 to 24 fibers.
Figure 2-13
WRAP Aerial Fiber Optic Cables (Reference 105)
2-13
State of Practice
Wind tunnel tests (1, 7, 44, 51, 68) have shown that there are no aerodynamic
instabilities such as un-iced galloping associated with the addition of WRAP aerial
cables on conductors and ground wires. To the contrary, it was determined that the
helical wrapping tends to reduce the level of aeolian vibration and the incidence of iced
galloping if compared to the performance of standard ground wires. Generally, an
attempt is made to limit the diameter of the WRAP aerial cable to 1/3 of the diameter of
the support wire. Experience has shown (45, 103) that this will not result in any
appreciable differences (i.e, less than 20 %) in the magnitude of the ice and wind loads
calculated for most spans.
2.2.5 Electrical Performance Specifications

A limited number of electrical performance tests are usually carried out to confirm the
mechanical characteristics of ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables and wires when
subjected to stresses created by the electrical environment in high voltage corridors.
These tests are:
N
Fault Current/Lightning Test (These tests are typically performed in accordance

with utility or applicable standard test procedures. The purpose of the test is to
evaluate the effects of fault currents and lightning strikes on the performance of
aerial cables and wires.)
Salt Fog/Erosion Test (The objective of the test is to determine the resistance of
ADSS and WRAP aerial cables and associated hardware to the effects of erosion and
tracking. Typically, components are subjected to the maximum mechanical and
electrical stresses expected to be encountered during the life cycle of the component.
The test is particularly important where ADSS or WRAP aerial cables are to be
installed on power lines with voltages greater than 138-kV.)
2.2.6 Mechanical Performance Specifications

Fibers used in the manufacturing of optical cables and wires for electric utility
networks are normally standard telecommunication single mode fibers. However,
multi mode or dispersion shifted single mode fibers are frequently considered for
specific applications. Typically, the fiber manufacturer, which may be different from
the cable or wire manufacturer, ensures that the fibers meet nationally and
internationally accepted standards and performance requirements. Certificates of
conformity and attenuation details are usually provided with each product in addition
to random test results at specified signal wavelengths.
To adequately address opto-mechanical and mechanical performance of aerial fiber
optic cables it is necessary to address the characteristics of the optical fibers as well as
the performance of the assembled cable or wire. These characteristics are defined by
tests such as:
2-14
State of Practice
N
Attenuation IEC 793-1 (Addresses the loss per km in dBs for carrying wavelengths,
temperatures, etc.. Particularly, the attenuation performance of the first and second
window is critical to the overall performance.)
Temperature Cycling Test IEC 793-1-D1 (Identifies the performance of optical fiber
at varying temperatures.)
Microbending Sensitivity IEC 793-1-C3 (The sensitivity of the optical fiber to

microbending is critical due to increased attenuation as a result of an increased
sensitivity.)
Frequency Response IEC 793-1-C2B (The frequency response of multi-mode fiber is

normally specified to adhere to minimum requirements in order to establish a
usable bandwidth.)
Other Parameters (Further specifications are usually defined that address the Cutoff Wave Length IEC 793-1-C7, Mode Field Diameter IEC 793-1-C9, Fiber Dispersion
IEC 793-1-C5, Numerical Aperture IEC 793-1-C6, and Macrobending Sensitivity IEC
793-1-C11.)
Typically, the optical fiber proof test which establishes the durability of the fiber is
used as an accepted reference by manufacturers. This test is usually carried out strictly
in accordance with IEC 793-1-B1. Specifications for other parameters usually
considered include:
N
Bending
IEC 793-1-B3
Abrasion
IEC 793-1-B4
Visual Examination
IEC 793-1-B5
Core Concentricity
IEC 793-1-A3
Stripability
IEC 793-1-B6
Generally, ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial fiber optic cables and wires to be used in
the electric utility industry are tested at least three different times during the
manufacturing process. First, each cable and wire design should be thoroughly tested
prior to full-scale production to verify the design of the component. Second,
production run samples should be continuously sampled at random and tested to
evaluate the performance of the manufactured product. Last, tests should be
performed on site just prior and after the installation to evaluate the performance of
the components as well as of the communication system.
2-15
State of Practice
The qualification tests typically carried out are dependent on the environmental
conditions that are expected to be encountered during the service life of the product.
Additionally, the anticipated method of installation will also define the magnitude of
the mechanical stresses acting on the cable that have to be verified during the
qualification test period. Most of the qualification tests that are usually required in the
characterization of a cable or wire are described in detail in IEC 794 or in the applicable
IEEE standard for OPGW aerial cables. The IEC 794 qualification tests are:
N
Aeolian Vibration Test (The objective of the aeolian vibration test is to assess the
fatigue performance of the cable and the optical characteristics of the optical fibers
when subjected to aeolian vibrations.)
Cold Temperature Flexure Test (As well as cyclic bending and flexibility tests
carried out in accordance with IEC 794-1-E6, are usually conducted to ascertain the
flexing of cables or wires at low temperatures, typically at a temperature equal to
the minimum expected working temperature of the fiber element.)
Corrosion Salt Fog Test (The objective of the corrosion test is to assess the
mechanical degradation of the metal components in an accelerated life simulation
using a salt fog environment.)
Creep Test (The objective of the creep test is to evaluate the long term sag-tension
behavior of the aerial cable under controlled conditions. The creep test should be
performed for a minimum of 1000 hours at 50 % of the maximum working load.
Usually, elongation and time are monitored and recorded.)
Crush Resistance (The objective of this test is to evaluate the crush resistance of an
ADSS, OPGW, or WRAP aerial cable. Usually, tests are carried out in accordance
with IEC 794-1-E3.)
Cut-Through Test (This is a specific test for polymer coated cables. The objective of
this test is to examine and evaluate the ability to withstand damage caused by
pressure from sharp abrasive edges.)
Flexibility/Cyclic Bend Testing (The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the

minimum bending radius and other general handling characteristics of the cable or
wire. These tests are normally carried out in accordance with procedures set out in
IEC 794-1-E6 and IEC 794-1-E11 in atmospheric conditions.)
Galloping Test (Constitutes a test to identify galloping characteristics of aerial cables

and wires.)
Impact Test (Test make-up varies for different cable and wire types. The standard
impact test should be performed in accordance with IEC 794-1-E4.)
2-16
State of Practice
N
Stress-Strain Test (Sag-tension relationships are critical parameters in the analysis,

design, and installation of aerial fiber optic cables and wires. Typically, the cable or
wire is cyclically loaded at various levels of stress while the cable or wire strain,
attenuation, and optical fiber strain are monitored and recorded.)
Temperature Cycling Test (This test is used to assess the suitability of cables or
wires to operate at various temperatures. Usually, attenuation measurements are
taken at various stages during the test procedure. The test should be performed in
accordance with IEC 794-1-F1.)
Torsion Test (The objective of the test is to assess the cable or wires torsional
characteristics including the susceptibility to twist under tensile loading. The test
should be performed in accordance with IEC 794-1-E7.)
Water Blocking Test (This test is designed to examine the effects of water
penetration in the presence of sheath damage on the aerial cable or wire. The test
should be performed in accordance with IEC 794-1-F5.)
Routine testing is usually carried out by the manufacturer at various stages throughout
the production of the optical cable. The information obtained from routine testing can
be used by the manufacturer and the customer to inspect the ongoing quality and
reliability of the product to be used in the high voltage corridor. Also, these tests
prevent the manufacturing of fiber optic cable with marginal properties.
Normally, the customer accepts the cables or wires in the field with an attached factory
test report. However, most customers require additional attenuation checks on the
fibers that are normally carried out with an Optical Time Domain Reflectometer
(OTDR) to verify the performance of the optical cable just prior to installation. Once
the installation has been completed, another attenuation check is performed on each
fiber to verify the functionality of the installed system.

Table 2-1 shows a breakdown of typical material and installation cost of fiber optic
aerial cable and wire. Costs are shown for typical aerial cable and wire with either 24
or 48 optical fibers. The majority of the cost is attributed to the cost of the cable itself
and the labor involved in the installation. It should be noted that the cost of the aerial
cable with 48 optical fibers is not twice as expensive than the comparable item with 24
optical fibers. Generally, the marginal cost of additional optical fibers decreases as the
number of fibers increase.
2-17
State of Practice
Table 2-1
Typical System Cost
Fiber Count
(24 Fibers)
ADSS
($/m)
($/ft)
Planning/System Design Cost

Cable/Wire Cost
Installation Material Cost
0.50
7.00
1.00
Labor Cost (Installation)

Labor Cost (Splicing of Fibers)
Labor Cost (System Commissioning)
($/m)
0.50
9.00
1.00
4.00
0.75
0.25
0.15
2.13
0.30
0.00
1.22
0.23
0.08
13.50
Total Cost
4.11
Fiber Count
(48 Fibers)
Planning/System Design Cost

Cable/Wire Cost
Installation Material Cost
Labor Cost (Installation)
Labor Cost (Splicing of Fibers)
Labor Cost (System Commissioning)
0.50
10.00
1.00
($/ft)
($/ft)
WRAP
($/m)
($/ft)
0.50
6.00
1.00
3.50
0.75
0.25
0.15
2.74
0.30
0.00
1.07
0.23
0.08
2.50
0.75
0.25
0.15
1.83
0.30
0.00
0.76
0.23
0.08
15.00
4.57
11.00
3.35
Type of Cable/Wire
OPGW
ADSS
($/m)
Total Cost
Type of Cable/Wire
OPGW
($/m)
0.50
12.00
1.00
4.00
1.50
0.40
0.15
3.05
0.30
0.00
1.22
0.46
0.12
17.40
5.30
($/ft)
WRAP
($/m)
($/ft)
0.50
9.00
1.00
3.50
1.50
0.40
0.15
3.65
0.30
0.00
1.07
0.46
0.12
2.50
1.50
0.40
0.15
2.74
0.30
0.00
0.76
0.46
0.12
18.90
5.76
14.90
4.54
A summary of pertinent product information on ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial

cables in high voltage corridors is provided in Table 2-2. The importance of each piece
of information is also provided.
2-18
State of Practice
2-19
State of Practice
2.3
Electrical Considerations
2.3.1 Placement
The location of an ADSS cable must be selected to permit adequate clearances from the
phase and ground conductors and to minimize the electric field on the sheath (1, 32, 79,
103). Additionally, placement of ADSS aerial cables is determined by other factors that
include clearances to ground, the electric field strength or the space potential to which
the cable will be exposed, and the strength of the structural attachment point.
The strength of the electric field or the value of the space potential at the location of the
ADSS cable is a deciding factor in applications at voltages greater than 230-kV (8, 14,
85). Although, ADSS cables have been installed successfully in many cases at voltages
up to 150-kV, several early designs installed at higher voltages (i.e., 230-kV and above)
suffered significant damage close to the grounded supports. It has been argued (7, 8,
15, 23, 29, 33) that capacitively induced voltages drive currents along the cable sheath
causing dry band arcing and eventual thermally induced damage to the cable sheath.
Other damage mechanisms include degradation of the ADSS cable by corona activities
at the tips of armor rods and other hardware, and corona on water droplets under wet
conditions.
Placement of OPGW aerial cables is typically determined by their alternate function as
ground or shield wire. The OPGW is placed in the normal location of the ground
wires, since it is intended to serve two different functions. WRAP aerial cables are also
normally wrapped around the regular ground wire. Hence, WRAP aerial cables are
subjected to the same environment as OPGW aerial cables. The two functions served
by OPGW and WRAP cables are:
N
Regular Ground Wire
Fiber Optic Communication Cable
2.3.2 Electrical Modeling and Analysis

Electric field modeling and analysis of OPGW and the WRAP fiber optic cables is not
typically required beyond traditional analysis normally performed for regular ground
wires. However, in unusual situations in which ground wire corona occurs, WRAP
aerial cable placement can be analyzed using a 2-D electrostatic analysis.
Detailed 3-D modeling and analysis of electric field patterns near the structures are
recommended in order to identify locations that will minimize the electric field
induced degradation of ADSS aerial cable. Otherwise, catastrophic failures within a
short period of time (2 to 10 months) can result. However, 3-D analyses require
significant resources which may not always be available prior to placement of aerial
2-20
State of Practice
optical cables and wires. At a minimum, a 2-D space potential calculation should be
used to identify the most suitable placement location for standard and angle
suspension structures. At the same time, it should be realized that a more rigorous 3-D
analysis may allow the placement of ADSS cables in potentials up to 40 kV (i.e.,
calculated in a 2-D analysis) by considering the shielding effect of the transmission
structure.
The problems observed in the field resulted in limited research work both in Europe
and the United States. Using a 3-D field calculation program, Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA) determined the electrical field distribution around the towers
and at the ends of the armor rod assemblies. The model included the tower,
conductors and fiber optic cable armor rods. The field calculation verified that corona
is likely to occur at the tips of the armor rods whenever the ends of the armor rods do
not all terminate at the same location along the length of the cable. BPA and other
utilities have observed corona caused deterioration on fiber optic cables installed on
345-kV or 500-kV transmission lines. In one instance, corona discharges severed the
cable after only a few months of operation.
BPA sponsored a project at Arizona State University (ASU) in 1995-1996 to perform
experimental studies and identify the severity of the corona caused fiber optic cable
deterioration. The field conditions of a high voltage line were replicated in the high
voltage laboratory and nine cable assemblies were tested for more than 4000 hours.
The results of the experiment showed that corona discharge can produce a dangerous
deterioration of fiber optic cables. The appearance of deterioration in the laboratory is
similar to the deterioration observed in the field. The amount of deterioration depends
on the field strength and the duration of exposure. The amount of deterioration
roughly correlates with the intensity of the partial discharges, measured in Coulombs.
The test results suggest that the corona punctures the cable jacket after seven to ten
years, assuming linear degradation.
The discussions during a recent EPRI workshop (December 12, 1996, Arizona State
University) indicated that the failure of ADSS fiber optic cables in high electric field
environments is an industry-wide problem. Houston Light and Power, Consolidated
Edison in New York and other utilities in England and Germany observed problems
similar to those of BPA. The analysis of failures and of the results of the BPA/ASU and
manufacturer performed tests revealed that long term exposure to high electric fields
initially causes cable jacket surface discoloration, followed by surface erosion, then the
puncture of the jacket, and ultimately the severing of the cable. Two physical
phenomena are thought to cause the cable failures:
N
Corona discharge at the tips of assembly rods that are not all terminated at the same
location on the cable (i.e., one rod sticks out further than others); and,
2-21
State of Practice
N
Dry band arcing on the surface of the cable under polluted conditions
BPA concentrated their observations and experiences on the corona phenomena.

Europeans believe that dry band arcing is the primary cause of the cable failures (11,
12, 13, 14). Analysis of the two phenomena suggests that the prevailing climatic
conditions are likely to have a major effect on the fiber optic cable failures.
Modeling of the electric field needs to be three-dimensional near the structures, since
the electric field does not possess sufficient symmetry (such as rotational symmetry) to
allow accurate, simplified two-dimensional calculations. The region of interest is the
space at the tip of metallic hardware that is close to the ADSS cable, since this is where
the strongest fields are expected. The metallic hardware may be the armor rods,
clamps or other attachment hardware. The hardware itself may be at ground potential,
but the electric field (i.e., the gradient of the potential) at the tips and corners of the
armor rods may still be quite high. In addition, metallic dampers installed on the
ADSS cable may have no connection to ground, in which case the induced voltage on
them may result in a high electric field at the tips and between the electrically floating
parts and the grounded parts.
The above discussion indicates that the region of interest need not be large in physical
dimensions, but its complicated geometrical details need to be represented precisely for
accurate field calculations. Hence, the computational effort can be quite significant. No
closed-form analytical solutions are available. The region of interest may be
unbounded on several sides, and may have well-defined physical and electrical
boundary conditions in other locations. Computational methods most suitable to tackle
this problem include the Finite Element Method (with ballooning or other means of
treating unbounded regions), the Boundary Element Method, and the Charge
Simulation Method. The most suitable software candidates for this application include
the commercially available ANSOFT programs and specialized software developed inhouse by some utilities (such as the BPA program).
2.3.3 Corona
The outer plastic sheath of an ADSS aerial cable is subject to erosion by discharges
when placed in the electric field of the phase conductors of the overhead power line
(12, 17, 18). While the influence is negligible at lower voltage levels, problems have
been observed on lines with higher voltage ratings. Typically, the surface of the ADSS
cable sheath changes in appearance and structure near the dead end and armor grip
suspension points. These changes indicated a degradation of the ADSS sheath surface.
Typically, the damage of the sheath, normally black with high density polyethylene,
arises within a few weeks to months. Consequently, the sheath material of ADSS aerial
cables must be resistant to electrical discharges.
2-22
State of Practice
Laboratory tests (9) showed significant changes in the mechanical properties of some
ADSS jacket materials after 2000 hours of exposure. It appears that jacket materials
with efficient combinations of Alumina Tryhydride, UV stabilizer, and cross-link
density have a sufficient resistance to tracking in space potentials of up to 25 kV.
Several methods of preventing or diminishing corona activities on ADSS aerial cables
exist (19, 27). One method consists of placing metallic electrodes on the ADSS cable in
the high electric stress regions. The electrodes provide a path for discharges away from
the cable surface, which protects the cable. However, the applicability of this
mitigation method for ADSS aerial cables has not yet been put to practice and should
be evaluated in a realistic environment for an extended time period. A second method
consists of the placement of large doughnut-shaped devices, usually cylindrical in
shape, on the cable to provide shielding from the high electric fields and to prevent
discharges that can damage the cable.
Apart from the traditional issues related to corona on normal ground wires, there are
no additional considerations related to corona for OPGW. The optical fibers in the
OPGW are shielded from electric field and corona activities, and the fibers are
inherently immune to electric disturbances from corona activities on the OPGW.
Similarly, the WRAP cable also does not present any corona related problems beyond
the traditional considerations of minimizing corona on ground wires and attachment
hardware.
2.3.4 Insulation
The sheaths of ADSS cables installed freely suspended on power lines are subjected to
electrical activity. The surface leakage currents are modest, but they may be driven by
substantial capacitively coupled voltages. In misty conditions, or during drying after
rainfall, large potential differences can appear across small lengths of dry cable,
causing local arcing. ADSS aerial cables adjacent to grounded fittings are particularly
vulnerable. Of course, surface leakage currents and the voltages available for dry band
arcing are a function of the system voltage, the line geometry, and the location of the
ADSS cable.
The ADSS cable is normally installed ten to twenty feet below the phase wires. It
parallels the phase wires and is subject to induced voltages. For this reason, the
construction of the ADSS should not include metallic components such as steel strands
for mechanical strength. At the structures, the ADSS is supporting by armor rods. The
armor rods surround the cable, distributing the mechanical loads more evenly.
Although the armor rod assemblies are grounded, they are subjected to a high electric
field (8, 14). Particularly high field concentrations have been observed at the tips of the
individual rods of the assembly. This high field may initiate corona discharge, which
can endanger the fiber optic cable. In the field utilities observed corona caused
deterioration on fiber optic cables installed on 345-kV or 500-kV transmission lines.
2-23
State of Practice
Additional insulation on the ADSS does not solve this problem. In order to avoid
degradation due to corona, the ADSS should be placed in locations with low electric
field as previously discussed in Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2.
Since the ADSS is normally installed below the phase wires, it is not typically subject to
lightning strikes. Also, since the ADSS normally does not contain metallic parts, there
are no issues related to ground loops or GPR. However, the insulation of the ADSS
may become sufficiently contaminated to conduct axial current that may pose a hazard
to personnel. Outer insulation of the ADSS should be selected to avoid this problem if
possible, and maintenance personnel should be trained to recognize the possible
hazards and to treat the contaminated ADSS as a conducting cable if necessary or as
required by local safety regulations.
The OPGW can be electrically bonded to the grounded structure or it's grounding
system, or it can be electrically insulated from ground. Insulated ground wires were
used traditionally as part of Power Line Carrier (PLC) communications systems, or as a
means of reducing system losses by eliminating induced ground wire currents. The
PLC communications option becomes obsolete since the OPGW can be used for utility
communications, but some old systems may still use PLC systems to avoid retrofit
costs. In either case, however, the OPGW does not present new or unusual insulation
problems as far as the OPGW itself is concerned.
The fiber optic cable is not specifically insulated from the metal strands of the OPGW.
The optical performance of the fiber optic cable is not affected by small radial or axial
potential differences on the cable. Protection against lightning strikes is provided by
the outer layer strands of the OPGW or the outer layer of the fiber optic cable, which
should be at least 2 mm (5/64 inch) thick. Issues of insulation from local grounds to
avoid ground loops in the communications electronics, and from Ground Potential Rise
(GPR) effects are covered in separate sections of this report.
Similar to OPGW, the WRAP fiber optic cable can be electrically bonded to the
grounded structure or it's grounding system, or it can be electrically insulated from
ground. The WRAP cable can be insulated from structures and grounding systems in
order to serve as part of PLC communications systems, or as a means of reducing
system losses by eliminating induced ground wire currents. The PLC communications
option becomes obsolete since the wrap-type itself can be used for utility
communications, but some old systems may still use PLC systems to avoid retrofit
costs. In either case, however, the WRAP aerial cable does not present new or unusual
insulation problems as far as the cable itself is concerned.
2-24
State of Practice
2.3.5 Lightning Performance

Since ADSS aerial cables are normally placed below the phase wires, they are usually
not exposed to direct lightning strikes. Also, ADSS cables are free of metal
components, resulting in a fault current of negligible magnitude.
OPGW aerial cables are placed at the top of structures and thus experience lightning
strikes and short-circuit currents. Typically, it is assumed that the energy in these
transients is dissipated safely due to the mass of the aluminum around the optical wire
and that the associated heating effect is negligible. However, under the passage of
short circuit currents, core temperatures can reach 100GC (212GF), which can cause
annealing of the aluminum components resulting in excessive strains (2, 34, 52). It is
important that there is no significant change in optical attenuation under these
conditions.
Since the majority of these energy transients are caused by fault currents, it is necessary
to take the maximum available fault current and the duration of the fault into account
in the selection of the OPGW aerial wire. OPGW aerial wires are typically rated using
the maximum I2t value.
Protection of the fibers against lightning strikes is provided by the outer layer of the
OPGW or the metal layer of the fiber optic cable, which should be at least 2 mm (5/64
inch) thick. The fiber itself can tolerate very high temperatures, but thermal
performance of plastic tubes, fiber coatings and aluminum or aluminum coated steel
wires needs to be carefully considered.
The lightning characteristics of WRAP aerial cables are very similar to the
characteristics of OPGW wires. However, since WRAP aerial cables are placed on the
outside of the ground wire, they are directly exposed to lightning strikes and the metal
tube of the cable must be designed to withstand all thermal stresses resulting from such
strikes. At the same time, the tube needs to be designed to carry the full magnitude
and duration of the fault current since it only parallels the ground wire, which is
designed to provide the primary path for the fault current.
2.3.6 Grounding
Since the ADSS used in high voltage environments does not contain metallic parts,
there is no question of grounding the cable. However, it must be recognized that the
ADSS aerial cable is mechanically attached to grounded parts at each structure. These
grounded parts include the structure members, clamps and armor rods. Also, since the
ADSS is placed in the electric field of the energized phase conductors, significant
induced voltages may be developed on the cable. This is important from the viewpoint
of ADSS cable aging and safety of personnel working in the cable while the line
remains energized.
2-25
State of Practice
As mentioned previously, the OPGW can be electrically bonded to the grounded

structure or its grounding system, or it can be electrically insulated from the ground.
In either case, however, the OPGW does not present new or unusual grounding
problems.
Similar to OPGW, the WRAP aerial fiber optic cable can be electrically bonded to the
grounded structure or it's grounding system, or it can be electrically insulated from
ground. In either case, however, the WRAP aerial cable does not present new or
unusual grounding problems as far as the cable itself is concerned.
Grounding of the communications equipment is discussed in a separate section.
2.3.7 Live Working

Installation and maintenance of the ADSS can be carried out live without interference
to the power system, since the ADSS cable is typically installed a sufficient distance
away from energized parts (i.e., maintaining minimum NESC clearances) and is
normally more easily accessible from ground. Caution during live work is required to
avoid potential hazards of induced voltages on metallic hardware of the ADSS that is
not grounded. Also, some danger from leakage current may exist on heavily polluted
ADSS. Experience shows, however, that such situations are rare.
OPGW aerial wires can be installed in the same way as normal ground wires unless
otherwise stated by the manufacturer. As with normal ground wire, care should be
taken to avoid scratching of aluminum coated strands to avoid corrosion. Some utilities
have replaced regular ground wires with OPGW using helicopters without deenergizing the line, i.e., using live working procedures. Splicing of OPGW with the
line energized can be performed. Splicing of the ground wire itself should follow the
same procedures as for regular ground wire, i.e., electrical continuity of the ground
wire must be maintained to avoid potentially hazardous voltage differences between
disconnected ends. Handling and splicing of the fiber optic cable portion of the OPGW
do not present additional dangers but require specialized training to ensure good
performance of the spliced fibers.
Live work on WRAP fiber optic cables generally follows the same procedures and
requires the same precautions and training as required for OPGW. In addition, care
must be taken when clamping onto the ground wire to avoid breaking the fiber optic
cable. An existing line can be retrofitted with WRAP fiber optic cable while energized.
Specialized tools and machines are available to install the fiber optic cable on the
existing ground wire without de-energizing the line. Splicing, however, is an easier
operation since the ground wire and the fiber optic cable can be spliced separately.
2-26
State of Practice
2.3.8 Communication Equipment

Several general concerns exist regarding the use of low-voltage communications
equipment in high voltage environments. The concerns relate to both, the operation of
the equipment, and the safety of service personnel and the public.
Although the fibers themselves are immune to electric fields and interference from the
power system, the electronic equipment may be susceptible to such influences. In
addition, multiple grounded OPGW and WRAP aerial cables may result in ground
loops which could contribute to interference problems, potential differences along
ground connections and possible danger of equipment damage. These problems exist
both during normal operation of the system and during abnormal situations such as
faults, switching operations and lightning storms. Proper shielding of the
communications equipment and proper coordination of grounding systems must be
used to avoid these problems.
The issue of safety of service personnel and the public arises in situations when lowvoltage power is brought from a distribution system to the vicinity of high-voltage
power lines to operate the electronic equipment. A fault or a switching surge on the
high-voltage line may induce very high voltages in the low-voltage supply system. This
can cause damage to the equipment and also present a hazard to nearby humans. In
addition, concerns exist that the fault current flowing to ground in situations of high
tower footing impedance can raise the potential of the local ground (GPR) to hazardous
levels. If the low-voltage supply system is also grounded at the fault location, the GPR
can be transferred long distances through the low-voltage neutral (Transferred
Potential) into the distribution system and into residences. Experience has shown that
these situations are rare, but can be very hazardous, leading to electrocution and
residential fires, when they occur. At this time, no obvious solutions can be suggested.

A summary of pertinent electrical considerations in using ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP
aerial cables in high voltage corridors is provided in Table 2-3. The relative importance
of each, estimated based on an extensive literature search, is also indicated.
2-27
State of Practice
2-28
State of Practice
2-29
State of Practice
2.4
Mechanical Considerations
2.4.1 Placement
The location of an ADSS or OPGW aerial cable, based on mechanical considerations,
must be selected to permit adequate clearances from the other phase and ground
conductors to avoid any mid-span clashing of the aerial optical cables with the phase
conductors and/or ground wires. The initial planning process requires that a decision
is made regarding the fixing point of the cable on each tower of the system. The actual
support point should be chosen after an evaluation of the following issues:
N
Ground clearances and phase-to-phase clearance requirements must be maintained

during installation (i.e., for live working) and inspection and maintenance related
tasks (i.e., again for live working).
Mechanical clearances to phase conductors and/or ground wires need to be

maintained during blow-out and ice induced galloping.
The additional loading imposed on support structures and the availability of

suitable attachment points.
Required Shielding Angle
2.4.2 Structural Loads

The lateral swing characteristics of the ADSS aerial cable varies substantially from
behavior observed for metallic conductors. Due to the small weight and relatively
large diameter of optical fiber aerial cables any transverse wind will result in a wide
deflection angle of the cable. For a normalized wind of 30 m/sec (98.4 ft/sec) the
deflection angle of an optical fiber aerial cable can reach up to about 80 degrees.
Comparable phase conductors or optical fiber cables with metallic armor reach
deflection angles of about 40 to 45 degrees only. Consequently, this fundamentally
different behavior of ADSS aerial cables with respect to phase conductors must be
considered when placing them on a tangent tower in a high voltage corridor.
Another problem that must be considered when installing an ADSS aerial cable is the
behavior under different climatic conditions. Due to the small weight to diameter ratio,
together with a relatively low Youngs modulus, an elongation up to 0.6 % of the ADSS
aerial cable can result under ice load conditions (103). Phase conductors have an
elongation in the range of 0.1 % under the same conditions. This means, that an ADSS
optical fiber aerial cable must be placed under high tension and therefore low sag
under normal conditions to maintain an appropriate distance to ground under ice
loading conditions.
2-30
State of Practice
2.4.3 Mechanical Modeling and Analysis

Creep rates for ADSS fiber optic cables are significantly different that comparable
values observed for traditional phase conductors and ground wires. A creep strain of
approximately 0.1 % can be expected after 30 years (i.e., if strung at a constant 50 % of
UTS), which is well below the value observed on conventional metal armored cables.
However, it should be kept in mind that creep rates may be significantly higher if
ADSS tensions increase frequently as a result of ice or snow deposits.
Generally, sag-tension charts are developed for various span lengths at a number of
temperatures for varying load cases. Each span is usually considered separately and
the aerial cable or wire is assumed to be at its final operating condition. Required
parameters to calculate sag-tension characteristics of ADSS and OPGW aerial cables
and wires are the respective cross-sectional areas of each material, the Youngs
Modulus of Elasticity of each component, and the Coefficient of Expansion of each
material. For example, the Coefficient of Expansion of Aramide, Copper, and Steel is
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
approximately -2.0b10 /GC, 17.0b10 /GC, and 12.0b10 /GC (-3.6b10 /GF, 30.6b10 /GF,
-6
and 21.6b10 /GF), respectively. The Coefficient of Expansion of the composite cable or
wire is usually approximated based on the values of each of the materials used in the
construction of the aerial cable or wire. Consequently, each type of aerial cable or wire
has a different Coefficient of Expansion.
Sag and tension can then be calculated using either the parabolic approximation or the
more accurate catenary formulation for a suspended cable or wire. While the parabolic
approximation is typically sufficiently accurate to perform a feasibility study or
preliminary design, it is recommended to calculate sag and tensions using the catenary
formulation for the final design. Sag-tension charts based on the catenary formulation
can usually be obtained from the manufacturer and are commonly treated confidential.
2.4.4 Cable and Wire Blow-Out

ADSS cables are very light and, as a result, in high winds the plane of the catenary can
become nearly horizontal, making clearance to phase conductors an important
consideration. Additionally, the sag difference between every day and maximum
working tensions may be greater than the adjacent conductors. Consequently, it is
necessary to consider sag, tension, and clearance-to-ground limits during all weather
conditions in the selection of the suspension tower attachment point.
2.4.5 Aeolian Vibration

OPGW performance evaluations under aeolian vibration are an important
consideration. For normal ACSR conductors, the maximum peak-to-peak anti-node
vibration amplitudes are on the order of the conductor diameter. However,
significantly higher vibration amplitudes can be observed on OPGW fiber optic wire
2-31
State of Practice
installations. The higher vibration amplitudes are commonly attributed to lower unit
mass (i.e., aluminum construction) and lower self-damping (i.e., solid or hollow tube
core construction) of the ADSS cable.
Aeolian vibration fatigue tests (23, 51, 73, 95) on a limited number of OPGW fiber optic
wires have been performed for up to 108 cycles at frequencies of 36 Hz with bending
strains of +/- 150 micro-strain. OPGW fiber optic wire tensions in these limited tests
were held constant at 20 % of the conductors ultimate strength. Results showed no
breakage of optical fibers or significant signal attenuation during any of the tests.
Dissection of the conductor revealed no wire breaks and only minimal wear on the
wires and on the alloy tube in the area of the suspension clamp. However, of ten armor
rod strands, four had fractured at the suspension clamp. Although this reduces the
subsequent protection that the armor rods extend to the composite conductor it is
8
commonly concluded that 10 cycles are representative of a reasonable life for such a
component. For example, if the component vibrates at 2 Hz, the expected life of the
component equals approximately 1.6 years.
The self damping characteristics of the OPGW wires are adequate to keep the microstrain below +/- 150 at higher frequencies (i.e., more than 90 Hz). However, additional
damping may be required at the lower frequencies. For excessive aeolian vibration,
dampers attached to each span typically provide sufficient damping to minimize the
risk of fatigue failures. While the normal Stockbridge damper has been adopted for
OPGW aerial cables and optical phase conductors, a rigid plastic helical configuration
is used for ADSS cables. For ADSS cables it is important that the damper is fitted
tightly to the cable to prevent it from working loose and sliding along the cable.
Currently there is little known about the vibration tendencies of ADSS, OPGW, and
WRAP type fiber optic cables and only limited field studies have been performed to
evaluate the aeolian vibration performance of these cables. Based on limited data (23,
51, 73, 95), it appears that similar to traditional conductors and ground wires the
vibration severity increases as the tension increases. However, at present, endurance
limits for ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP cables have not been identified. Therefore, it is
not clear at which point fatigue and failure will occur. It is estimated that steel or
aluminum cables exposed to vibration levels would experience fatigue failures within
10 years which is of course substantially less than the typically expected service life of
25 years.
2.4.6 Galloping
Sag-tension analyses are typically used to calculate and plot the galloping ellipses for
ADSS and OPGW aerial cables. A plot of the galloping ellipses displays the clearances
required to avoid flashover during galloping. Galloping ellipses of ADSS cables differ
significantly from ellipses predicted for comparable phase conductors and ground
wires (50, 53, 62). It is estimated that the galloping ellipses of ADSS aerial cable are
2-32
State of Practice
significantly smaller than for traditional ground wire and phase conductors.
Consequently, it is recommended to further study the phenomena and define the
dynamic behavior of ADSS fiber optic aerial cables more accurately.
The galloping ellipse design method, traditionally used for phase conductors and
shield wires, is based upon observed behavior of actual galloping events on
transmission lines over many years. However, manufacturers of ADSS cable claim that
the propensity of ADSS aerial cable to galloping is significantly lower than for
traditional phase conductors and ground wires. Nevertheless, lacking any more
detailed information, the galloping behavior of ADSS cables is commonly assumed to
be comparable to traditional wires (i.e., conservative assumption).

A summary of pertinent mechanical considerations in using ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP
aerial cables in high voltage corridors is provided in Table 2-4. The relative importance
of each, estimated based on an extensive literature search, is also indicated.
2-33
State of Practice
2-34
State of Practice
2.5
Installation
A number of issues need to be addressed prior to the installation of aerial cables or

wires in high voltage corridors. First, route maps are typically procured that include
information on terrain features, elevations, and access points. Second, it is necessary to
identify the different types of towers on the route and associated drawings. Third, a
site survey should be completed (i.e., unless current site survey available) and splice
points should be identified.
OPGW aerial wires can be installed on an energized circuit. Great care should be taken
to utilize similar methods (i.e., energized or non-energized work procedures) to those
typically used in the stringing of regular ground wire. Also, equipment such as
stringing blocks typically used for the stringing of OPGW aerial wires should be sized
adequately to be used in the installation of OPGW.
Prior to installation, training should be provided for the installation crews. Specific
installation details should be provided for each phase of the installation to ensure that
the expected optical performance of the fiber will not be compromised in the
installation process. Finally, optical cable or wire should not be allowed to rotate
during the installation because it will allow the stranding to loosen up causing the wire
to elongate. Providing two alternating layers of reinforcement or stranding can
significantly reduce the tendency to rotate.
Because ADSS cables are completely non-metallic, they can be installed on energized
circuits. This is an important feature since it helps reduce installation costs by avoiding
or minimizing loss of revenue during the installation period. A safe and viable code of
practice in the installation that can be followed includes: a) the ADSS cable and rope
pulling connection must be light and flexible in addition to being non-metallic and be
suitable for use near the voltage rating of the energized conductors; b) installation
equipment such as tensioning gear must be functional and calibrated wherever
applicable; c) adequate working clearances to adjacent live circuits must be maintained;
d) all erection equipment must be fully insulated; e) line fittings and vibration dampers
should have temporary ground leads attached to provide a low resistance path to the
ground for any induced currents; f) line crews should be provided with on-site training
to validate erection equipment and working methods.
Our review showed that OPGW is mainly used for long span, high voltage applications
and that the deadend fittings used on OPGW wires are primarily of the bolted block or
helical grip type. Typically, the suspension hardware used for OPGW fiber optics are
either armor grip suspension or bolted clamps while dampers are mostly of the
Stockbridge type. In the past, ADSS cable appears to have been used mainly for shorter
spans and lower voltages (7), but recently, ADSS cable with span lengths of up to
1000m is being installed on 500-kV transmission lines. Contrary to OPGW, ADSS
deadend fittings are mostly of the helical type and the fiber optic cable is suspended by
2-35
State of Practice
armor grip suspensions. Also, the dampers used on ADSS cables are almost exclusively
spiral vibration dampers.
For OPGW conductors with two or more layers of strands, whether installing by
tension stringing or slack pulling methods no additional precautions are required
beyond those normally associated with good practice in the handling and erection of
conductors for high voltage lines. For OPGW with a single layer of strands there is a
tendency to unwind during tension stringing, with a consequent increase in length that
reduces the value of the designed strain margin. Therefore, procedures must be
adopted to restrain this tendency by utilizing an anti-rotational device at the leading
end of the conductor. This in turn will require the use of open-sided running blocks.
Additionally, the arrangement for terminating the conductor at tension towers must
restrain the conductors tendency to untwist.
In optical fiber transmission lines, one of the most important considerations is how
splicing operations can be simplified and how the time for such splicing can be
shortened to reduce installation cost. A number of aerial fiber optic connectors have
been designed in the recent past and evaluated in limited field installations. Based on
the evaluation it appears that significant cost savings can be achieved.
WRAP fiber optic cables are typically easy to install even in relatively difficult terrain
and eliminate the need for guard structures to avoid obstructions such as power lines,
railways, and roads. At the same time, the universal applicability of the WRAP
installation process easily facilitates shield wires and conductors of varying size which
reduces procurement and inventory cost. However, the WRAP type cable must have
the right combination of strength and flexibility to be installed at the correct tension.
Also, the added projected area can reduce the allowable wind span by up to 20 percent.
Furthermore, good tracking and heat resistance are an important consideration to
ensure that a WRAP cable can resist temperatures in excess of 100GC (212GC ) caused by
a lightning strike or fault current in the conductor.
The installation of WRAP type cables is usually done by a cable wrapping machine that
spins a cable reel as it travels along the conductor or shield wire. It is important that
the cable wrapping machine is fitted with a counter-balance system that keeps the
machine in balance along the span as the optical cable is dispensed. Additionally, it is
critical that the cable tension control system of the wrapping machine is capable of
maintaining the correct tension even on steep inclines and declines.
Typically 40 km (25 miles) or greater repeater spacing is achievable with single-mode
fiber, which is less expensive than multi-mode fiber, operating at 1300 nm. The
repeater spacing can be readily extended if the single-mode fibers are operated at 1550
nm, for which the attenuation of the installed fiber typically does not exceed 0.3 dB/km
(0.48 dB/mile). The maximum repeater spacing for multi-mode fiber ranges from 7.5
2-36
State of Practice
km (4.7 miles) to 25 km (15.5 miles) for wavebands ranging from 850 to 1300 nm
respectively at a nominal rate of 34 Mbit/s.
2.5.1 Equipment
Fiber optic aerial cable and wire are normally supplied on either wooden or metal
reels. The type and construction of the reel stand determine the methods and tools
required for handling. Reels must be supporting by either an axle or from above with
the help of a spreader bar. The stand has to have a tensioner to supply the required
back tension to the aerial cable. The stand should be selected to accommodate the cable
reel dimensions and gross weight. Some standard reels are not designed to withstand
the forces developed by braking during high tension stringing operations.
Consequently, direct tension stringing from the reel at aerial cable installation stringing
tensions should not be attempted unless the stand and reel has been designed
appropriately. However, the cable may be pulled directly from the reel stand if slack
stringing methods are used that allow only minimal tension to be applied.
Both, bullwheel and reel type pulling machines can be used to install fiber optic cable.
However, the pulling and braking system should be operated smoothly to prevent any
sudden jerking or bouncing of the cable during the installation. Pullers and tensioners
should be equipped with tension indicating and limiting devices to prevent any
overstress in the aerial cable. Reels are typically stored in the same manner and
environment considered appropriate for conductor and ground wire reels.
Equipment used in the installation such as sheaves should be dimensioned in such a
manner that the diameter of the sheave is not less than 0.3 m (12 inches) at mid-span
suspension points and 0.5 m (20 inches) at angles in excess of 25 degrees. The
minimum radius and depth of the sheave groove is recommended to be 75 percent
larger and 25 percent deeper than the diameter of the cable, respectively.
2.5.2 Tensioning and Pulling Requirements

Mechanical strength and bending behavior are important issues in the evaluation of
cable alternatives. In order to avoid breaking of the fiber under normal operating
conditions it is necessary that the cable has passed a quality control screening test of at
least 5 N (1.1 lbs). This means that the whole fiber has been exposed to a force of 5 N
(1.1 lbs) so that small flaws and defects in the primary coating are detected by a
breakage of the fiber. This screen test together with a normal fiber strength of more
than 50 N (11.25 lbs) for a 1 m (3.3 ft) sample gives the security that is necessary for
optical fiber cables.
Pulling rates of 1.5 to 8 km/hr (1 to 5 miles/hour) allow the cable to pass through the
sheaves smoothly. Once the cable has started to move, the progress should be
maintained at a constant rate until the whole cable segment has been pulled into place.
2-37
State of Practice
At all times during the pull, the operator of the tensioner should monitor the tension
measured in the cable to assure that the maximum pulling tension is not exceeded.
Generally, the pulling tension of the cable should never exceed 50 percent of the
maximum initial sagging tension.
2.5.3 Pulling Lengths

The selection of pull, tension, anchor, and splicing sites involves many factors ranging
from system design issues to logistics and equipment capabilities. Segment lengths are
governed by the allowable number of splices, accessibility, obstacles in the right-ofway, and cable reel lengths. Other factors that are critical are the maximum load the
aerial cable or wire can handle, maximum permissible structural loads, and the
availability of adequate grounding systems wherever necessary. Installations of ADSS
or OPGW aerial cable or wire use pulling lengths ranging from 2 to 5 km (1 to 3 miles)
depending on the weight and diameter of the cable to be installed.
2.5.4 Installation Methods

The installation of ADSS or OPGW aerial cables normally requires ground access along
the power line, even though tension stringing techniques are generally used. Suitable
running blocks are suspended from the attachment points. The type of running blocks
to be used is usually recommended by the manufacturer. A pilot rope is then manually
installed through the running blocks between the first and the last tower of the
stringing section. The puller and tensioner should be positioned in such a manner that
the slope from the equipment to the first tower does not damage the cable during the
installation. Additionally, it is recommended to use a large block at the first structure
to minimize the bending stresses in the cable during installation.
The pulling winch and back tensioner are positioned at the first and last tower,
respectively. These are then used to install the ADSS or OPGW aerial cable, which is
connected to the pilot rope. At the same time, the ADSS or OPGW drum is located at
the back tensioner to supply sufficient back tension to keep the wire clear of the ground
and other obstructions. Once the aerial cable has been pulled in place, the tension in
the wire is adjusted to achieve the correct sag-tension parameters. The aerial cable is
then clamped off at the end of the first tension section and the process is repeated down
the line.
More recently, electric utilities have developed methods for installing ADSS or OPGW
aerial cables on multiple circuit overhead power lines without taking an outage on
adjacent circuits. These methods usually employ helicopters and cradle blocks.
Typically, the aerial cable is pulled using a previously installed light rope at low
tension. The advantages of this method of installation are that there is no need for
2-38
State of Practice
circuit outages and the effects of roads, railways, low voltage lines and other
obstructions are minimized.
Experience with stringing ground and phase wires indicates that significant induced
currents (as high as 500 A) can occur when stringing is performed near other energized
lines (23, 103, 111). Hence, stringing of OPGW and WRAP cables live (i.e., when the
line is energized) needs to recognize this hazard and suitable precautions need to be
taken. The precautions normally include the use of running grounds, i.e., roller
assemblies that allow the cable being strung to pass through well-grounded rollers
under sufficient tension to maintain good continuous contact. The running ground
assemblies are grounded to structure steel and/or driven ground rods. Depending on
the section length of the cable being strung, the running grounds may need to be placed
in several locations, i.e., at the bullwheel and on several towers along the line.
The use of running grounds on the OPGW is the same as for regular ground wires.
However, the WRAP cable presents the problem of continuity of contact to the ground
wire. Since the optical cable is wrapped around the ground wire, a traditional set of
rollers cannot provide continuous reliable contact, because the rollers must jump
over the non-conductive fiber optic cable. Modified roller assemblies, which allow the
contact rollers to rotate around the periphery of the WRAP cable, can be utilized. This
problem, however, pertains only to the stringing of WRAP cable.
When retrofitting an existing cable by wrapping the fiber optic cable on the existing
(i.e., already strung) ground wire, the problem of induced current is not an issue. The
fiber optic installation is performed by an automated device that is installed on the
ground wire and rides along it in a spiral fashion to wrap the fiber optic cable stored
on-board the device. In this case, caution needs to be exercised by workers when
installing and removing the device on the ground wire, but this procedure does not
require additional safety related considerations beyond those already known and
needed during traditional live work.
Safety equipment for use in stringing operations is addressed in IEC Publication 1328
TR2 Ed.1 (1995) Live working - Installation of transmission line conductors and earthwires Stringing equipment and accessory items, and document 78/186/CD Live working Installation of distribution line conductors - Stringing equipment and accessory items and in
IEEE Standard 524-1992 IEEE Guide for the Installation of Overhead Transmission Line
Conductors.
Installation of ADSS presents its own set of safety considerations. Since the ADSS is not
conductive, the issue of induced current is eliminated. Two other issues arise,
however:
N
Handling and installation of metallic hardware in the vicinity of live lines.
Training of workers in fiber optics and live working.

2-39
State of Practice
These two issues require totally dissimilar skills and training, but they are brought
together during installation of ADSS on energized lines. At this time, the workers are
typically trained in one or the other, but not both. Often, in fact, the optical work is the
specialty of communications workers while live installation skills are available in the
operations and maintenance groups.
To resolve this dichotomy of requirements, utilities may wish to invest in training
special crews to perform both functions, or to control very strictly the activities and
access of the two groups. For example, one utility utilized maintenance crews skilled in
live working to install the cables on structures under live conditions, and at the same
time restrict the communications workers from approaching the structures. After the
structure work is completed, the communications workers take over and perform the
required connections to the cables on the ground. No guidelines or standards, other
than those developed within individual organizations based on common sense, have
been formulated to date regarding the live installation of ADSS.

A summary of pertinent considerations for installing ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial
cables in high voltage corridors is provided in Table 2-5. The relative importance of
each, estimated based on an extensive literature search, is also indicated.
2-40
State of Practice
2-41
State of Practice
2.6
Inspection and Maintenance
Fiber optic system supervision is typically dealt with on two different levels. A
lowering of the transmission quality in the fiber optic communication constitutes a
minor problem, while the loss of transmission capability requires immediate remedial
action by the operator of the system. Transmission characteristics of the optical fiber
and terminal equipment that are usually monitored are:
N
End to End Power Loss
Attenuation in Optical Fiber
Attenuation at Splices and/or Connectors
Multiplexer Characteristics
The electrical safety issues during inspection and maintenance relate also to the fact
that the operations often bring together two previously unrelated technologies and skill
sets:
N
Fiber optic technology
Live working technology
As mentioned in connection with installation of the OPGW, WRAP and ADSS cables,
communications workers are typically not trained in live working procedures, and live
working crews are not skilled in handling delicate fiber optic cables, equipment and
components. No guidelines or standards, other than those developed within
individual organizations based on common sense, have been formulated to date
regarding the live inspection and maintenance of fiber optic installations.
2.6.1 Types of Failures

In general, operating experience for all types of fiber optic cable and any associated
hardware has been good. However, some minor problems have been reported with all
cable types and fittings. The share of major problems experienced with fiber optic
cable is higher for ADSS and WRAP than for OPGW. Most of the major problems
associated with ADSS cable at lower circuit voltages appear to be related to galloping,
damage of the cable sheath from bird pecking, and broken fibers. Most of the major
problems associated with ADSS cable at higher circuit voltages are similar to the
problems mentioned previously with the inclusion of corona cutting, tracking and
arcing.
The outdoor performance of fiber optic cable sheaths is affected by a number of
different influences including ultraviolet light, atmospheric oxygen, moisture, and
2-42
State of Practice
gaseous and solid pollution. Typically, assuming the cable is initially satisfactory,
long-term outdoor exposure may result in one or more of the following adverse effects:
a) changes in the molecular weight of the polymer and modifications of the polymer by
oxidation; b) leaching of plasticizers resulting in embrittlement and possible cracking of
the sheath; and c) leaching and modification of the additives and/or filler materials.
The contributing factors to the degradation are: a) weather (i.e., sun, rain, climate); b)
pollution (i.e., sand, dust, salt, industrial); c) thermal (i.e., temperature changes); and d)
mechanical (i.e., wind, snow, ice).
2.6.2 Aging Effects

The attenuation stability of optical fibers integrated in ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP cable
over time and temperature is of paramount importance to the planning of long distance
communication links. However, currently there are no acceptance tests that enable a
utility to qualify a minimum level of performance. Tests have shown that some form of
aging process is taking place on the fibers that increases attenuation in the fibers over
time (12, 18, 23). To account for the increase in attenuation over time it has been
suggested that a safety margin of not less than 0.01 dB/km (0.02 dB/mile) should be
used. However, experimental data are very limited and may differ significantly for
cables other than the specimens tested.
Fiber strain in any optical cable or wire must be carefully controlled because it affects
the expected service life of the optical fiber and system attenuation. To achieve an
expected service life of 25 years, fiber strain must not exceed 1/3 of the proof strain
applied during manufacture. Additionally, local radial crushing forces must be
avoided by the design of the cable since they increase the local attenuation caused by
microbending.
2.6.3 Inspection Methods and Tools

ADSS aerial cables require special safety precautions as a result of their possible semiconducting nature. Special safety procedures and arrangements need to be defined to
inspect ADSS aerial cables whenever working under live line conditions. While ADSS
cables can be considered non-conducting during the installation in the presence of live
lines (i.e., if regulations allow), ADSS is very likely to become semi-conductive during
the service life as a result of surface deposits and the hydrophilic nature of the jacket
material, which should be considered during maintenance.
Equipment required for inspection and maintenance for ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP
aerial cables and wires is usually limited to technology that can be used to check for the
integrity and degradation of the transmission in the fiber of the communication cable.
Currently, there are no inspection tools (i.e., other than close-up visual examination)
2-43
State of Practice
that can assist the electric utility to identify any potential electrical or mechanical
problems of ADSS, OPGW, or WRAP aerial cables and wires prior to failure.
2.6.4 Repair Methods and Tools

Usually, an alarm indication of a broken fiber or change of light signature is required to
identify a defect in any of the fibers (i.e., potential impending mechanical failure) of the
aerial cable or wire. Consequently, an interruption (i.e., potential mechanical failure) of
the transmission in the whole cable is usually indicated by the large number of fibers
detected to be defective. However, as long as the number of undamaged fibers is
above the number of used fibers, the repair can be planned but does not have to be
performed immediately after recognition of the problem. The repair can therefore be
delayed until other maintenance operations are required. On the other hand, if the
communication system is using all available fiber, repairs must usually be performed
without delay.
If the defect is located at a splice, the repair can usually be done with the remaining
part of the optical cable in service. If the defect is located along the power line, it must
usually be taken out of service to allow for the repair. A few mid-span joints have been
recently developed by manufacturers but are not commonly used. Typically, a midspan repair requires significant resources and a circuit outage which makes the cost of
this technology prohibitive. Under these circumstances it is usually more effective to
replace a section of cable at locations where splicing can be facilitated.

A summary of pertinent considerations for the inspection and maintenance of ADSS,
OPGW, and WRAP aerial cables in high voltage corridors is provided in Table 2-6. The
relative importance of each, estimated based on an extensive literature search, is also
indicated.
2-44
State of Practice
2-45
State of Practice
2-46
3
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Primarily, there are three different cable options available to an electric utility that
elects to integrate communications into their existing power transmission system. The
currently available cables and wires that can be used in high voltage corridors are:
N
ADSS
(All-Dielectric Self Supporting Cable)
OPGW
(Optical Ground Wire)
WRAP
(Optical Cable Wrapped on Ground Wire)
Typical material and installation cost are shown in Table 2-1 for aerial cable or wire
with either 24 or 48 optical fibers. The cost of the cable/wire itself and the labor
required in the installation make up the majority of the system development cost.
There has been considerable experience gained with successful OPGW applications in
power transmission corridors at most system voltages. For the most part, with the
exception of aeolian vibration problems, the installation and operation of OPGW aerial
wires has been satisfactory. The application of WRAP cable, although less common
than OPGW, has also been relatively successful. The challenges that have not been
fully resolved yet on WRAP cable include maintaining tension during stringing, control
of contact between the WRAP cable and grounded parts to eliminate induced currents,
and proper application of ground wire clamps to avoid damage to the optical cable
during live work. However, recent applications of ADSS aerial fiber optic cables have
shown that there are a number of technical challenges that remain to be solved to
achieve an acceptable service life.
Inspection and damage assessment tools need to be identified to evaluate the integrity
of aerial cables and wires. These inspection and assessment tools are required by
electric utilities to locate developing problem areas prior to catastrophic failure.
According to some estimates, service interruption of a fully loaded fiber optic cable or
wire can cause the affected carrier losses of up to $1000 per minute. Regular inspection
and reliable damage detection procedures and tools could be used in preventive
maintenance programs that could significantly reduce repair cost and increase the
reliability of the communication system.
3-1
Conclusions and Recommendations
Currently, there are no IEEE standards or guidelines that assist the utility engineer in
the planning, installation, operation, and maintenance of fiber optic communication
systems in high voltage corridors. Existing standards and draft standards currently in
existence or under development solely address electrical and mechanical performance
of aerial cables that are mostly suited for quality control in the manufacturing process.
3.1
All Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables
ADSS aerial cables exhibit significantly different creep behavior than traditional phase
or ground conductors. ADSS cables frequently subjected to icing may creep
substantially more than traditional wires that are likely to reduce the service life of the
communication system. Thus, it is recommended to investigate the stress-strain, creep,
and sag-tension characteristics of commonly used ADSS aerial cables to define the long
term performance and expected service life under various field conditions. The results
of such an investigation would allow utility engineers to more accurately define system
capital cost and inspection and maintenance requirements.
Further research is required to more accurately define the aging mechanism and service
life of ADSS aerial cable in the presence of electric fields and ultra-violet (UV)
radiation. It appears that the presence of UV radiation in combination with various
pollutants can significantly accelerate the aging process of ADSS aerial cable resulting
in a significantly shortened service life. Our estimates, at this time, indicate that the
service life of ADSS aerial cables under adverse conditions may be as short as 7 to 10
years rather than the anticipated service life of 20 to 30 years.
It has been determined that the severity of aeolian vibration is proportional to the
tension in the cable. It appears that the level of vibration increases as the tension of
ADSS cable increases. Consequently, for most applications, it is necessary to employ
dampers on ADSS cables for virtually any length of span. Currently, there are a
number of areas that have not yet been clearly defined. These areas are:
N
Fatigue Endurance Limits
Self-Damping
Damper Performance
Effects of Hardware
Effects of Marker Balls
It is recommended that more independent research in this area should be conducted to

provide electric utilities with the information required to mitigate potential system
problems.
3-2
Currently, there are indications that the galloping behavior of ADSS aerial cables may
be significantly different from the galloping behavior of traditional conductors. The
prediction of galloping amplitude, galloping ellipse, and dynamic loads for traditional
conductors is currently based on a very limited number of observations made on
transmission lines in the 1960s. Limited tests indicate that the galloping ellipses of
ADSS aerial cables may be significantly smaller than predicted which would allow the
utility engineer to more accurately define placement locations within the right-of-way.
More data are required to accurately predict:
N
Galloping Amplitude
Galloping Motion
Resulting Dynamic Loads
It is recommended that more independent research in this area should be conducted to

provide electric utilities with the information required to mitigate potential system
problems.
The location of an ADSS cable must be selected to permit adequate clearances from the
phase and ground conductors and to minimize the electric potential on the sheath. It
has been argued that capacitively induced voltages drive currents along the
contaminated cable sheath causing dry band arcing and eventual thermally induced
damage to the cable sheath. Other damage mechanisms include degradation of the
ADSS cable by corona activities at the tips of armor rods and other hardware, and
corona on water droplets under wet conditions. Indications are that non-metallic
hardware could be utilized to mitigate some of the electric field problems. More
detailed studies need to be performed to further evaluate the effectiveness of such
hardware before field installation.
Field density or voltage level thresholds that cause damage to ADSS aerial cables have
not been clearly defined. Similarly, threshold levels have not yet been correlated with
rates of degradation and associated changes in the service life. Further research is
required to more accurately define maximum permissible exposure levels and
associated service lives. Additional information in this area will allow the utility
engineer to more accurately define placement positions in existing right-of-ways,
evaluate the potential for sheath damage and eventual mechanical failure of the aerial
cable, and to evaluate life cycle capital cost of the communication link.
ADSS aerial cables require special safety precautions as a result of their possible semiconducting nature. Special safety procedures and arrangements need to be researched
and defined to inspect ADSS aerial cables whenever working under live line
conditions. Experience shows that ADSS aerial cables are very likely to become semiconductive during the service life as a result of surface deposits and the hydrophilic
nature of the jacket material, and this should be considered during maintenance.
3-3
3.2
Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)
The severity of aeolian vibrations on OPGW aerial wires is proportional to the tension
in the wire. Limited tests show that the self-damping and fatigue endurance limits of
OPGW aerial wires are noticeably different from comparable values for traditional
conductors. Consequently, for most applications, it is necessary to employ dampers on
OPGW cables for virtually any length of span. Similar to ADSS fiber optic cables, there
are a number of areas that have not yet been clearly defined. These areas are:
N
Fatigue Endurance Limits
Self-Damping
Damper Performance
Effects of Hardware
Effects of Marker Balls
Consequently, it is recommended that more independent research in this area should

be conducted to provide electric utilities with the information required to mitigate
potential system problems.
3.3
Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)
WRAP aerial cables are most frequently attached to the ground wire. The main
problems with this type of cable currently encountered are related to the tension
maintained during the installation process. Based on field experience, it is critical to
maintain the correct tension at all times during the installation. However, currently
there are no clear guidelines addressing the magnitude of the tension and or the
consequences if the tension can not be maintained correctly. More field experiences
should be identified to better define the long term performance of this technology.
Similar to ADSS aerial cables, there are indications that the galloping behavior of
WRAP aerial cables may be significantly different from the galloping behavior of
traditional conductors. Limited tests indicate that the galloping characteristics of
WRAP aerial cables may be significantly different from predicted behavior. More
research should be performed to accurately define:
N
Galloping Amplitude
Galloping Motion
Resulting Dynamic Loads
3-4
High temperature conductor operation can result in excessive WRAP tensions when the
aerial cable is installed on the phase conductor. Indications are that this may cause
premature failure of the optical fibers resulting in a complete loss of communications.
Further studies are necessary to identify acceptable combinations of initial wrapping
tensions and temperature changes that do not adversely affect the integrity of the
optical fibers.
3-5
3-6
4
REFERENCES
(1)
Martin, and Lehmusvuori, Optical Fibre Planning Guide for Power Utilities,
ELECTRA, No 157, pp. 95-97, Dec 1994.
(2)
IEEE Standard Construction of Composite Fiber Optic Overhead Ground Wire (OPGW)
For Use on Electric Utility Power Lines, IEEE Std 1138, IEEE, New York, NY, 1994.
(3)
National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI C-2, IEEE, New York, NY, 1997.
(4)
FOCAS Industry Data for Skylite (OPGW) Skywrap (WRAP) and Skyspan (ADSS)
Product Lines, On-line Data Only, www.focas.com, 1997.
(5)
Brugg Industry Data for OPGW-Al, OPGW-ST, Telecom Rope and Submarine
Cable, On-line Data only, www.brugg.com, 1997.
(6)
Agarwal & Hutcheson, Performance and Reliability of Optical Fiber Connectors

in the Outside Plant Environment, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging
and Manufacturing, IEEE, Part B, Vol 18, No 2, pp.221-226, May 1995.
(7)
Bartlett, Carlton and Carter, The Design and Application of Optical Cables into
Overhead Lines up to 150kV, presented at the IEE Conference on Overhead
Line Design and Construction: Theory and Practice, pp. 166-172, November 2830, 1988.
(8)
Berkers, and Wetzer, Electrical Stresses On A Self-Supporting Metal Free Cable

in High Voltage Networks, presented at the 5th International Conference on
Dielectric Materials and Applications, Canterbury, U.K., pp. 69-72, 1988.
(9)
Wheeler, Lissenburg, Hinchliffe, and Slevin, The Development and Testing of

a Track Resistant Sheathing Material for Aerial Optical Fibre Cables, presented
at the 5th International Conference on Dielectric Materials and Applications,
Canterbury, U.K., pp. 73-76, 1988.
(10)
Rowland and Carter, The Evaluation of Sheathing Materials For an All

Dielectric Self-supporting Communication Cable for Use On Long Span
Overhead Power Lines, presented at the 5th International Conference on
Dielectric Materials and Applications, Canterbury, U.K., pp. 77-80, 1988.
4-1
References
(11)
Carter, Arc Control Devices For Use On All- Dielectric Self Supporting Optical
Cables, IEE Proceedings-A, IEE, Vol 140, No 5, pp. 357-361, September 1993.
(12)
Rowland and Easthope, Electrical Aging and Testing of Dielectric Selfsupporting Cables for Overhead Power Lines, IEE Proceedings-A, IEE, Vol 140,
No 5, pp. 351-356, 1993.
(13)
Carter and Waldron, Mathematical Model of Dry Band Arcing on SelfSupporting All-Dielectric Optical Cables Strung on Overhead Power Lines, IEE
Proceedings-A, IEE, Vol 139, No 3, pp. 185-196, May 1992.
(14)
Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Effects of Ultrahigh Voltage Transmission Lines,

Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Final Report, EPRI El-802, Project
566, June 1978.
(15)
Billings, and Smith, Tracking in Polymeric Insulation, IEEE Transaction on

Electrical Insulation, IEEE, New York, Vol EI-2, No 3, pp. 131-137, Dec 1967.
(16)
Loberg, and Salthouse, Dry Band Growth on Polluted Insulation, IEEE

Transaction on Electrical Insulation, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol EI-6, No 3, pp. 136141, September 1971.
(17)
Stimper, and Middendorf, Mechanisms of Deterioration of Electrical Insulation

Surfaces, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol EI19, No 4, pp. 314-320, August 1984.
(18)
Clabburn, Penneck, and Swinmurn, The Outdoor Performance of Plastic

Materials Used as Cable Accessories, IEEE Proceedings, IEEE, New York, NY,pp.
1833-1842, 1973.
(19)
Astle-Fletcher, Proposal For Preventing Damage to High-Voltage Plastics

Insulators by Surface Electrical Discharges, Correspondence, British Railways
Department, Derby, U.K., 1969.
(20)
Austin, Barnett, and Gaylard, Optical Communications Using Overhead

Transmission Lines, CIGRE, TC 35-04, pp. 1-7, 1984.
(21)
Burggendieck, Herff, and Mainka, 25Km Optical Aerial Cable Link on 100Kv
Overhead Line, CIGRE, TC 35-09, pp. 1-8, 1984.
(22)
Gaylard, Dey, Holden, Taylor, Smith, Maddock, and Kent, Optical

Communication Using Overhead Power Lines, CIGRE, TC 35-01, pp. 1-11, 1982.
(23)
Jurdens, Haag, and Buchwald, Experience with Optical Fibre Aerial Cables on
High Voltage Power Lines, CIGRE, TC 22-11, pp. 1-10, 1988.
4-2
References
(24)
Kouteynikoff, Pays, Mollier, Pannier, Bonicel, and Trombert, Optical Fiber

Communication on the Electricity Transmission Network, CIGRE, TC 35-103,
pp. 1-10, 1990.
(25)
Chung, and Ding, Stress Strain Characteristics of Self Supporting Aerial Optical
Fibre Cables, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 178-185, 1991.
(26)
Olszewki, and Masterson, Lightning Considerations in Optical Cables Design,

IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 141-147, 1986.
(27)
Takahara, Ishihata, Sairo, Niikura, Horima, Kurosawa, Takeda, and Ohmori,

Withstanding High Voltage Characteristics of Non Metallic Self Supporting
Optical Cable, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 441-448, 1987.
(28)
Rowland, Craddock, Carter, Houghton, and Delme-Jones, The Development of

a Metal Free Self Supporting Optical Cable for Use on Long Span High Voltage
Overhead Power Lines, IWCS Proceedings, IWSC, pp. 449-456, 1987.
(29)
A.G.W.M. Berkers, Electrical Stresses on a Self-Supporting Metal Free Optical Fibre in

High Voltage Networks, Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology,
Netherlands, 1987.
(30)
Koga, Motomitsu, and Taguchi, Lightning Surge Waves Induced in

Transmission Lines, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 363-379, 1980.
(31)
Rahman, Eastwood, Rivett, and Herrera, Design and Practical Consideration

for Manufacturing A Non-Metallic Fiber Optic Cable for Aerial Application,
(32)
Oestrich, and Nassar, Self Supporting Dielectric Fiber Optic Cable in High
Voltage Lines, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 79-82, 1988.
(33)
Carter, Dry Band Electrical Activity on Optical Cables Separately Strung on

Overhead Power Lines, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 117-121, 1988.
(34)
Yokoya, Goda, Katsuragi, Nagatu, and Asano, Development of Lightning

Resistant Overhead Optical Ground Wire, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,
IEEE, New York, NY, Vol 9, No 3, pp. 1517-1523, July 1994.
(35)
Nichols, Platt, Taha, Carter, and Neve, The Development of a Post-Fit System
for an All-Dielectric Self Supporting Optical Cable, CIGRE, TC 22-304, pp. 1-9,
1996.
(36)
Haag, Hog, and Zamzow, New Generation of Self Supporting Optical Fibre
Aerial Cables, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 575-582, 1989.
4-3
References
(37)
Bonicel, Couvrie, Kouteynikoff, Tatat, and De Vecchis, Reparation of a Fibre

Optic Ground Wire on an UHV Overhead Power Line, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS,
pp. 326-330, 1989.
(38)
Nakagaki, et al, Development of High Performance Composite Fibre-Optic

Overhead Ground Wire, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 464-471, 1986.
(39)
Tuss, Misona, Okazato, and Kobayashi, Composite Ground Wire with Optical
Fibers, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 484-489, 1986.
(40)
Lin, Katayama, and Masuda, Development of Optical Ground Wire For 1.55
micrometer Wavelength, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 457-463, 1987.
(41)
Bianchi, and Rota, Optical Fibre Ground Wire, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp.
464-474, 1987.
(42)
Igarishi et al, Composite Fiber Optic Overhead Ground Wire, IWCS

Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 312-321, 1980.
(43)
Schneider, Schmelter, and Herff, Optical Ground Wire Design with a

Minimum of Dielectrics, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 83-92, 1988.
(44)
Carter, Baker, Allen, Bartlett, and Martin, The Development of Wrap-on Optical
Cables for Use on the Earth Wires of High Voltage Power Lines, CIGRE, TC 2208, pp. 1-6, 1988.
(45)
Yoshida, Ikeya, Kamata, and Miyajima, Winding of Optical Fiber Onto Existing
Ground Wire, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 472-477, 1986.
(46)
Grooten, Bresser, and Berkers, Practical Experience With Metal Free Self
Supporting Aerial Optical Fibre Cable in High Voltage Networks, IWCS
(47)
Wong, and Lyons, Pre-Stranded Self Supporting Aerial Cable Design, IWCS
(48)
Busch, and Bow, Armored Fiber Optic Cable for Subscriber Use, Wire Journal
International, pp. 35-42, Oct 1988.
(49)
Bartlett , Carlton, Carter, and Peacock, Self-supporting Metal Free Optical Cable
for Long-Span Power Line Use, CIRED, pp. 252-258, 1989.
(50)
Desai, Yu, Shah, and Popplewell, Perturbation -Based Finite Element Analyses
of Transmission Line Galloping, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol 191, No 4,
pp.469-489, April 1996.
4-4
References
(51)
Sunkle, and Christian, The Effects of Tension on Vibration of All-Dielectric SelfSupporting Fiber Optic Cable, IEEE Proceedings, IEEE, New York, NY, pp. 197203, 1995.
(52)
Wiltshire, and Reeve, A Review of Environmental Factors Affecting Optical

Cable Design, Journal of LightWave Technology, Vol 6, No 2, pp. 179-185,
February 1988.
(53)
Tomita, Kawase, Shinohara, and Fuchigami, Suppression of Galloping

Oscillation for a Self-supporting Optical Fiber Cable, Journal of Lightwave
Technology, Vol 6, No 2, pp. 186-190, February 1988.
(54)
Lu, Glaesemann, Vanderwoestine, and Kar, Recent Developments in

Hermetically Sealed Coated Optical Fiber, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol
6, No 2, pp. 240-244, February 1988.
(55)
Katayama, Plastics for Optical Communication in Japan, presented at the

Plastics in Telecommunications IV conference in Japan, pp. 711-719, 1986.
(56)
Wagatusma, Okazaki, Yamamoto, and Yamakawa, Thermoplastic

Rubber/Liquid Crystal Dual Co-Extrusion Coating System for Optical Fiber
Drawing, presented at the Plastics in Telecommunications IV conference in
Japan, pp. 811-819, 1986.
(57)
Barnes, Hill, Vyas, and Sutehall, Sheath Retraction in Optical Fiber Cables,
presented at the Plastics in Telecommunications IV conference in Japan, pp.
1011-1013, 1986.
(58)
Aloisio, Blyler, and Chapin, Polymer Coatings for Optical Fibers, presented at
the Plastics in Telecommunications IV conference in Japan, pp. 1211-1216, 1986.
(59)
Ruchet, Bongard, Koch, Meier, Weber, and Zurcher, Transmission of

Information by Means of Optical Fibres Incorporated in an Overhead Earth
Conductor, CIGRE, TC 35-08, pp. 1-6, 1982.
(60)
Maddock, Hazell, Callcut, Gaylard, Dey, Slaughter, and Lawton, Optical Fibre
Communication Using Overhead Transmission Lines, CIGRE, TC 35-01, pp. 113, 1980.
(61)
Benndorf, Doering, Dagefrerde, and Pfeiffer, Fibre-Optic System for

Transmission of Information on High Voltage Overhead Power Lines, CIGRE,
TC 35-09, pp. 1-12, 1980.
4-5
References
(62)
Jianwei Wang, Overhead Transmission Line Galloping, A New Model,

Applications and Design Recommendations, IEEE Conference Proceedings, IEEE,
New York, NY, pp. 1-8, 1995.
(63)
Oestreich, Zeidler, Bark, and Lawrence, Fiber Optic Cable for Aerial
Application, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 394-401, 1980.
(64)
Madock, Lawton, and Pickup, Optical Fibres in Overhead Power Transmission

Systems for Communication and Control, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 402-409,
1980.
(65)
Kloepper, Menze, Schlute, Maltz, and Teucher, Short and Long Self Supporting
Non Metallic Aerial Fiber Optic Cable, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 186-205,
1991.
(66)
Meyere, Special Report for Group 22, Overhead Lines, CIGRE, TC 22-00, pp. 17, 1988.
(67)
Haag, Hog, Hoffart, Sommer, Wieskowski, and Zamzow, Self Supporting

Optical Fibre Aerial Cable Constructions and Related Parameters for
Transmission at Lambda= 1550nm, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 206-217, 1991.
(68)
Kawanabe, Matsuashi, and Fujibayashi, Aerodynamic Force of Aerial Cables,

(69)
Ushizaka, Komaki, Niikiura, Horima, Sato, and Yamada, A Study on Aerial

Optical Cable with Optical Connectors on Both Ends for Optical Transmission
Line, IWCS Proceedings, IWSC, pp. 148-157, 1990.
(70)
Dodd, McDowell, and Wagman, Design and Test Considerations for Fibre
Optic Aerial Cables, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 166-176, 1990.
(71)
Oestrich et al, Fiber Optic Cable for Aerial Application, IWCS Proceedings,
IWCS, pp. 394-401, 1980.
(72)
Jones, Alexander, and Williams, Pre-Installation Testing and Installation

Experience with a Fiber-Optic Cored Shield Wire on A Rochester Gas and
Electric Corporation 115Kv Transmission Line, IEEE Transactions on Power
Apparatus and Systems, IEEE, New York, NY, PAS -103, No 8, pp. 2075-2080,
August 1984.
(73)
Amman, Weck, and Papailiou, Two Year Vibration Measurement and Their
Evaluation for and Optical Wire (OPGW) Installed on a 400kV Transmission
Line, CIGRE, TC 22-202, pp. 1-8, 1990.
4-6
References
(74)
Ghannoum, Guilbault, Miron, and Yaacoub, Design, Testing and Validation of

Optical Ground Wires and Hardware for Use in Hydro-Quebecs 5000km of
Telecommunication Network, CIGRE, TC 22-301, pp. 1-8, 1989.
(75)
Ishida et al, Development of Stress Free 24 Core OPGW, IWCS Proceedings,

IWCS, pp. 177-185, 1990.
(76)
Nassar, and Adamson, Design and Qualification of Fiber Optic Ground Wires,
(77)
Nishiyama, Kitayama, Shimida, Kikuta, and Matsuo, New Composite Fiber

Optic Overhead Ground Wire, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 490-495, 1986.
(78)
Keith, Bucklan, and Hovis, Figure-8 Fibre Optic Cable, IWCS Proceedings,
IWCS, pp. 464-474, 1987.
(79)
Maddock, Lawton, and Pickup, Optical Fibres in Overhead Power

Transmission Systems for Communication and Control, IWCS Proceedings,
IWCS, pp. 402-409, 1980.
(80)
Iwazaki, Katagiri, Sekiguchi, and Masaki, Theoretical Analysis and

Recreational Countermeasure of Dancing Phenomena on Self-Supporting Cable,
(81)
Ishihata et al, Movement of Non-Metallic Self-Supporting Optical Fiber Cable

Under Wind Pressure, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 100-108, 1988.
(82)
Installation of Fibre Optic Cables on the National Grid Transmission Network, NGC
Products, On-line Data Only, www.energis.co.uk, 1997.
(83)
Ghannoum, and Yoshida, Optical Ground Wire for Hydro-Quebecs

Telecommunication Network, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, IEEE, New
York, NY, Vol 10, No 4, pp. 1729-1730, Oct 1995.
(84)
Nakamura, Kuroshima, Takeuchi, Sanpei, Suzuki, Ishikura, Inoue, and Uematsu,

Installation of 66kV Power-Optical Fiber Composite Submarine Cable and
Water Pipe for the Trans-Tokyo Bay Highway, IEEE Transactions on Power
Delivery, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol 10 No 3, pp.1156-1167, July 1995.
(85)
Kirkham, Johnston, and Allen, Design Considerations For a Fiber Optic

Communications Network For Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power
Delivery, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol 9, No 1, pp. 510-518, Jan 1994.
(86)
Donoghy, and Dabbs, Sub-Threshold Flaws and Their Failure Prediction in

Long Distance Optical Fiber Cables, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol 6, No 2,
February, pp. 226-232, 1988.
4-7
References
(87)
Bratton, Transfer Trip Relaying Over a Digitally Multiplexed Fiber Optic Link,
IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, IEEE, New York, NY,Vol PAS103, No 2, pp. 403-406, February 1984.
(88)
TF.22.11.03, Results of the Questionnaire, Fittings for Fibre Optic Cables on

Overhead Lines, ELECTRA, No.165, TF.22.11.03, pp. 53-65, April 1996.
(89)
Kouteynikoff, Pays, Moller, Pannier, Bonicel, and Trombert, Optical Fibre

Telecommunications on the Electricity Transmission Network, CIGRE, TC 35103, pp. 1-10, 1990.
(90)
Hanselmann, Technical Report on a Questionnaire on Fibre Optic Applications

in Power Utility Communications, CIGRE, TC 35-108, pp. 1-6, 1990.
(91)
Crofts, Communication Network Security Using Optical Fibre, CIGRE, TC 3502, pp. 1-5, 1982.
(92)
Yamanoi, Kubota, Hirao, Kajitani, and Kudo, Application of Optical Fibre

Communication Systems for Electric Power Utilities, CIGRE, TC 35-03, pp. 1-6,
1982.
(93)
Lindstrom, Fibers Fragile When it Freezes, Americas Network, May 15, pp. 2428, 1997.
(94)
Carlton, Henderson, Higgs, and Kiddle, Development of Communications

Transmissions Networks Within a UK All Purpose Electricity Board, CIGRE,
TC 35-05, pp. 1-7, 1988.
(95)
Carlton, Carter, Peacock, and Sutehall, Monitoring Trials on All-Dielectric Selfsupporting Optical Cable for Power Line Use, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 5963, 1992.
(96)
Bidinger, Lynen, and Ney, Design and Operation of an Aerial Fibre Optic Cable
for Railroad Communications, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 218-226, 1991.
(97)
Brondson, Carter, Kent, and Idion, The Successful Evaluation of a 400KV

Composite Ground Wire Optical Communication System, IWCS Proceedings,
IWSC, pp. 496-504, 1986
(98)
Masterson, Innovative Ways of Installing Fibre Optic Cables, IWCS

(99)
Kaiju et al, Pre-Connectorized OPGW with Multiconnector, IWCS Proceedings,

IWCS, pp. 685-691, 1988.
4-8
References
(100) Lamarche, Gagnon, and Miron, Long Term Attenuation Measurements on

Optical Ground Wires, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, IEEE, New York,
NY, Vol 11, No 4, pp. 1863-1867, November 1996.
(101) Tanaka, and Honjo, Long Term Reliability of Transmission Loss in Optical
Fiber Cables, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol 6, No 2, pp. 210-217, February
1988.
(102) Chapman, Cheng, and Cronin, Optical Attenuation Testing in Field and
Factory, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 279-289, 1980.
(103) Optical Fibre Planning Guide for Power Utilities, CIGRE WG 35.04, 1995, Report.
(104) Saotome, Yoshioka, Okada, and Urasawa, Technology for Replacing Existing
Ground Wires with Multi-Core OPGW, IEE Conference on Overhead Line Design
and Construction: Theory and Practice, IEE, U.K., pp. 161-165, 28-30 November,
1988.
(105) Fiber Optics, Alistair Glass, Physics Today, pp. 34-38, Oct 1993.
(106) Bock, Porada, Beaulieu, and Eftimov, Automatic Calibration of a Fiber-Optic
Strain Sensor Using a Self Learning System, IEEE Transactions on
Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol 43, No 2, pp. 341-346,
April 1994.
(107) Pollitt, Standards to Support Light Wave Communications, IEEE Transactions
on Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol 44, No 2, pp. 454457, April 1995.
(108) Gunderson, Lecroart, and Tatekura, The Asia Pacific Cable Network, IEEE
Communications Proceedings, IEEE, New York, NY, pp. 42-48, February 1996.
(109) The Secrets of Everlasting Life, Brown, New Scientist, pp. 36-40, April 1995.
(110) Neimi and Orbeck, Test Methods Useful in Determining the Wet Voltage
Capability of Polymer Insulator Systems After Time Related Exposure, IEEE
Transactions on Electrical Insulation, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol EI-9, No 3, pp. 102108, September 1974.
(111) Kuffel, and Zaengl, High-Voltage Engineering, Pergamon Press, New York, NY,
1984, ISBN-0-08-024213-8.
(112) Sugiyami, Hatata, and Azuma, Development of a PCM Current Differential
Relaying System Using Fiber Optic Data Transmission, IEEE Transactions of
Power Apparatus and Systems, IEEE, New York, NY, Vol PAS-103, No 1, pp. 152158, Jan 1984.
4-9
References
(113) Komaki, Tanji, and Moriya, Portable Bypass Optical Cable System for Aerial
Installation, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 1-11, 1991.
(114) Borremans, Special Report for Group 35-1984, Communication, CIGRE, TC 3500, pp. 1-3, 1984.
(115) Borremans, Special Report for Group 35-1982, Communication, CIGRE, TC 3500, pp. 1-4, 1982.
(116) Joransson, Special Report for Group 35-1980, Communication, CIGRE, TC 3500, pp. 1-4, 1980.
(117) Igarashi, Yokoyama, Iwamura, Mori, Matsubara, and Saito, Composite FiberOptic Overhead Ground Wire, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 312-321, 1980.
(118) Sontag, and Ross, A Fibre Optic Monitoring System, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS,
pp. 449-454, 1986.
(119) Frank, and Mann, A Ruggedized Fiber Optic Cable Offering Superior Coupled
Power and Bandwidth Capabilities, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 505-509, 1986.
(120) Kawasaki, Yamazaki, Tokunaga, and Sanbonsugi, Suitable Design and
Characteristics of Optical ground Wire for 1.5micrometer Wavelength, IWCS
(121) Ishii et al, SZ Cabled Metal Free Optical Cable for Long Span Aerial
Application, IWCS Proceedings, IWCS, pp. 109-116, 1988.
(122) Kiss, Performance of Optical Fibre Cables and Operations and Maintenance
procedures in the Australian Telecommunications Network, IWCS Proceedings,
IWCS, pp. 206-212, 1988.
(123) Matsuda, Sakuda, and Taskashima, Final Approaches in Metallic Cable
Technologies- Improvement of Aerial Distribution Cable Systems, IWCS
4-10

Fiber Optic TR 108959

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fiber Optic TR 108959

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fiber Optic TR 108959

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fiber Optic Cables in

Overhead Transmission Corridors

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

To summarize currently available technical information, applicable regulatory codes

Encased within the ground wire (OPGW)

Wrapped around the phase conductor or the ground wire (WRAP)

Contained in an all-dielectric-self-supporting cable (ADSS)

Overhead transmission power line corridors provide the telecommunications industry

Encased within the Ground Wire (OPGW)

Encased within the Phase Conductor (OPPC)

Wrapped around the Phase Conductor or the Ground Wire (WRAP)

Contained in an All-Dielectric-Self-Supporting Cable (ADSS)

1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1-1

2.3.3 Corona ....................................................................................................... 2-22

Contained in an All-Dielectric-Self-Supporting Cable (ADSS)

Encased within the Ground Wire (OPGW)

Encased within the Phase Conductor (OPPC)

Wrapped around the Phase Conductor or the Ground Wire (WRAP)

With the development of high strength-to-weight ratio insulating materials, ADSS

Summarize currently available technical information, applicable regulatory codes

Applicable References & Publications

116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123

Rather than summarizing and discussing the information documented in each

A variable elongation that depends on the environmental conditions at the time of

High mechanical strength to guarantee excellent performance of the cable or wire

Very low water permeability (i.e., low hydraulic conductivity).

1.3.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables

Corona (i.e., luminous and audible partial discharges in a non-uniform electric

1.3.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)

Tension @ 25% UTS

Creep rates in percent elongation

1.3.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)

gradients in excess of 15 to 20 kV/cm significantly deteriorate the cable jacket as a

2.1.1 Analysis and Design Guidelines

2.1.2 Regulatory Codes and Standards

2.1.3 Summary Evaluation

Fiber optic communication cables are neither subject to electromagnetic interference

The technology offers very long information transmission distances of up to 80 km

Lucent Fitel/Phillips Fitel Technologies

Lucent Fitel/Phillips Fitel Technologies, two companies of the Fitel group,

2.2.2 All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) Cables

2.2.3 Optical Ground Wire (OPGW)

2.2.4 Wrap-Type Fiber Optic Cables (WRAP)

2.2.5 Electrical Performance Specifications

Fault Current/Lightning Test (These tests are typically performed in accordance

2.2.6 Mechanical Performance Specifications

Microbending Sensitivity IEC 793-1-C3 (The sensitivity of the optical fiber to

Frequency Response IEC 793-1-C2B (The frequency response of multi-mode fiber is

Flexibility/Cyclic Bend Testing (The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the

Galloping Test (Constitutes a test to identify galloping characteristics of aerial cables

Stress-Strain Test (Sag-tension relationships are critical parameters in the analysis,

2.2.7 Summary Evaluation

Planning/System Design Cost

Labor Cost (Installation)

Planning/System Design Cost

A summary of pertinent product information on ADSS, OPGW, and WRAP aerial

Regular Ground Wire

Fiber Optic Communication Cable

2.3.2 Electrical Modeling and Analysis