This randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of AN0128 cream, a novel anti-inflammatory drug, for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. 103 subjects were randomized to receive either AN0128 cream 1% or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, 51% of subjects receiving AN0128 cream and 37% receiving vehicle cream achieved clear or almost clear skin, though the difference was not statistically significant. For subjects with moderate dermatitis at baseline, 47% receiving AN0128 cream and 29% receiving vehicle cream achieved at least a two-grade improvement, with a p-value of 0.15. Both treatments were well
This randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of AN0128 cream, a novel anti-inflammatory drug, for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. 103 subjects were randomized to receive either AN0128 cream 1% or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, 51% of subjects receiving AN0128 cream and 37% receiving vehicle cream achieved clear or almost clear skin, though the difference was not statistically significant. For subjects with moderate dermatitis at baseline, 47% receiving AN0128 cream and 29% receiving vehicle cream achieved at least a two-grade improvement, with a p-value of 0.15. Both treatments were well
This randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of AN0128 cream, a novel anti-inflammatory drug, for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. 103 subjects were randomized to receive either AN0128 cream 1% or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, 51% of subjects receiving AN0128 cream and 37% receiving vehicle cream achieved clear or almost clear skin, though the difference was not statistically significant. For subjects with moderate dermatitis at baseline, 47% receiving AN0128 cream and 29% receiving vehicle cream achieved at least a two-grade improvement, with a p-value of 0.15. Both treatments were well
This randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of AN0128 cream, a novel anti-inflammatory drug, for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. 103 subjects were randomized to receive either AN0128 cream 1% or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, 51% of subjects receiving AN0128 cream and 37% receiving vehicle cream achieved clear or almost clear skin, though the difference was not statistically significant. For subjects with moderate dermatitis at baseline, 47% receiving AN0128 cream and 29% receiving vehicle cream achieved at least a two-grade improvement, with a p-value of 0.15. Both treatments were well
A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multi-center study to
evaluate the safety and efcacy of topically applied AN0128 cream, 1% for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis Karl Beutner, MD, PhD, Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States; Terry Jones, MD, J & S Studies, Bryan, TX, United States; Alicia Bucko, DO, Academic Dermatology Associates, Albuquerque, NM, United States; Robert Loss, MD, Dermatology Associates of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States AN0128 is a novel topical anti-inammatory drug which blocks pro-inammatory cytokines in vitro and in preclinical studies demonstrates an excellent topical and systemic safety prole. As the rst clinical trial of this new therapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, this trial was considered exploratory in nature and thus there were no formal power calculations. Eight centers enrolled 103 subjects over 18 years of age with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) and a body surface area of 3% to 10% to be randomized 2:1 to twice daily treatment for 4 weeks with either AN0128 cream 1% or the vehicle cream. At baseline, 67% of subjects were evaluated as moderate in severity. An intent to treat analysis of all subjects randomized, at the end of the treatment period showed that 51% (30/59) of the AN0128 treated subjects vs. 37% (13/35) of the vehicle treated group reached a level of clear or almost clear (P = .19) based on a 5-point (clear, almost clear, mild, moderate, or severe) investigator static global assessment (ISGA). In a modified intend to treat population of only those subjects who were of moderate severity at baseline, 47% (18/38) of the AN0128 treated group and 29%(7/24) of the vehicle group reached at least a two grade improvement in their ISGA (P = .15). Both treatments were well tolerated with only rare application site reactions and no serious adverse events report. The results of this study would indicate that AN0128 represents a potential newtherapy for ADand this study provides the necessary data to power future trials. Commercial support: None identified. P718 Efcacy and safety of a new hydrogel formulation of desonide 0.05% in pediatric subjects with atopic dermatitis Adelaide Hebert, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, United States; Fran Cook-Bolden, MD, The Skin Specialty Group and The Department of Dermatology, The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Barry Calvarese, MS, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc., Petaluma, CA, United States; Ronald Trancik, PhD, SkinMedica, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, United States The low potency topical corticosteroid desonide has been widely used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) for over 30 years. Currently only traditional creams, ointments and lotions are available in this potency class. However, a new hydrogel formulation of desonide has been developed. It is distinguished as an alcohol and surfactant-free, carbopol-based polymer that contains 0.05% (w/w) of micronized desonide and is composed of 89% water. This hydrogel formulation was designed to be mild, free from sensitizing ingredients, moisturizing, cosmetically elegant, and easily applied for use in AD patients aged 3 months and older. Recently, two phase III clinical trials in mild-to-moderate AD subjects aged 3 months to 18 years were conducted. The mean age of subjects was 6.7 years with 30% of subjects being under 3 years of age. A total of 425 subjects were treated with desonide hydrogel and 157 subjects with the hydrogel vehicle twice daily for 4 weeks. Desonide hydrogel 0.05% was extremely well tolerated and provided statistically signicant improvements in all primary (P\.001) and secondary (P\.006) efficacy endpoints in both studies. Subjects in the active group experienced significant clearing of their disease with a rapid reduction of body surface area affected as early as week 2. At the end of treatment, 58% of desonide hydrogel treated subjects had their disease assessed as clear or almost clear by investigators assessment. This novel desonide formulation represents an important advancement in the treatment of AD. 100% is sponsored by SkinMedica, Inc. P719 Effect of pimecrolimus on health-care costs in pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis Charu Taneja, MS, MPH, Policy Analysis Inc, Brookline, MA, United States; Tom Delea, MBA, Policy Analysis Inc, Brookline, MA, United States; Francis Lobo, PhD, MS, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, United States; Mark Jackson, MD, MD, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States Introduction: The efcacy and safety of pimecrolimus (PIM) cream 1% in pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) was recently accessed in a 26 week randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Patients aged 2-17 years were randomized to receive PIM cream 1% b.i.d or vehicle bid at rst signs/ symptoms of AD, with topical corticosteroid (TCS) to be applied after 3 days without improvement in symptoms. PIM patients had 41% fewer days with TCS use (mean 12.9 vs 21.9 days for vehicle), 50% fewer ares (mean 0.84 vs 1.68 respectively), and 2/3 fewer unscheduled outpatient visits (mean 0.34 vs 0.93 respectively). This study estimates differences in healthcare costs between the two study arms based on utilization data collected in this trial and unit costs from secondary sources. Methods: Measures of interest included the utilization and costs of PIM, TCS, and unscheduled outpatient visits. Because utilization (g) of PIM and TCS were not collected in the trial, they were estimated by combining data from the trial on therapy days and body surface area involved (BSAI) at each follow-up assessment with published estimates of g/m 2 BSAI for topical therapies. Patients with missing data required to estimate BSAI during follow-up were excluded. Numbers of unscheduled visits in each arm were obtained from the trial. The unit cost of PIM was based on its wholesale acquisition costs; unit costs of TCS and outpatient visits were based on data from a large managed-care claims database. Results: Baseline characteristics for patients in the two treatment groups (n = 234 and 241 for PIM and vehicle respectively) were similar. Patients in the PIM group used a mean 53.2 g of PIM with a mean cost of $99.57. However, mean utilization of TCS was lower with PIM vs vehicle (17.9 vs. 37.0 g, P = .006). Costs of TCS were therefore reduced by $13.59 ($12.68 vs $26.27, P = .005). Costs of unscheduled visits also were $31.65 lower in the PIM group ($19.18 vs $50.83, P \.001). After accounting for these savings, total costs (PIM1TCS1visits) were $54.32 greater with PIM vs vehicle ($131.42 vs $77.10, P = .002). Conclusion. In pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate AD, PIMis associated with significant reductions in the use of TCS, numbers of flares, and frequency of unscheduled outpatient visits. These clinical benefits result in cost savings which offset 55%of the acquisition cost of PIM. Supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. P720 AB72 J AM ACAD DERMATOL FEBRUARY 2007
Evaluating The Combined Efficacy of Oral Isotretinoin and Topical Tacrolimus Versus Oral Finasteride and Topical Tacrolimus in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia-A Randomized Controlled Trial
Effectiveness of Combined Antibiotic Ophthalmic Solution in The Treatment of Hordeolum After Incision and Curettage: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial: A Pilot Study
Comparison of Efficacy of Adapalene (0.1% Gel) Monotherapy Ve Adapalene (0.1%) Plus Benzyl Peroxide (2.5%) Combination Therapy For Treatment of Mild To Moderate Acne Vulgaris