Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Performance Appraisal System For Schools District Supervisors and Coordinating Principals

    Uploaded by

    Riza Gaquit
    This document is a performance appraisal form for school district supervisors and coordinating principals. It evaluates performance based on three categories: occupational competence, professional and personal characteristics, and attendance and punctuality. For each category, it lists specific performance indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 10. The ratings are totaled and an overall descriptive rating is assigned. The form requires signatures from the ratee, rater, ESA head, and Schools Division Superintendent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Performance Appraisal System For Schools District Supervisors and Coordinating Principals

    Uploaded by

    Riza Gaquit
    30 views2 pages
    This document is a performance appraisal form for school district supervisors and coordinating principals. It evaluates performance based on three categories: occupational competence, professional and personal characteristics, and attendance and punctuality. For each category, it lists specific performance indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 10. The ratings are totaled and an overall descriptive rating is assigned. The form requires signatures from the ratee, rater, ESA head, and Schools Division Superintendent.

    Original Description:

    head teacher

    Original Title

    Tool for PSDS2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a performance appraisal form for school district supervisors and coordinating principals. It evaluates performance based on three categories: occupational competence, professional and personal characteristics, and attendance and punctuality. For each category, it lists specific performance indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 10. The ratings are totaled and an overall descriptive rating is assigned. The form requires signatures from the ratee, rater, ESA head, and Schools Division Superintendent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    30 views2 pages

    Performance Appraisal System For Schools District Supervisors and Coordinating Principals

    Uploaded by

    Riza Gaquit
    This document is a performance appraisal form for school district supervisors and coordinating principals. It evaluates performance based on three categories: occupational competence, professional and personal characteristics, and attendance and punctuality. For each category, it lists specific performance indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 10. The ratings are totaled and an overall descriptive rating is assigned. The form requires signatures from the ratee, rater, ESA head, and Schools Division Superintendent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PAS Form B-3

    PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM


    FOR SCHOOLS DISTRICT SUPERVISORS AND
    COORDINATING PRINCIPALS
    (PASSA)
    Name:______________________________________ District: ___________
    Position/Designation__________________________ ESA :
    _____________
    Rating Period: _______________________________ Division: Bohol
    School Year: !"-!"3 Region
    : #$$
    PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1
    0
    8 6 4 2 Rati
    !
    1" OCCUPATIONAL COMPETENCE (#0$)
    A. Planning
    "% Prepared district development plan/supervisory and technical
    assistance plan
    B. Plan Implementation
    "% Provided support to school heads/cluster heads in the
    development of the School Improvement Plan
    2. Implemented the district development plan, administrative,
    supervisory and technical assistance plan
    3% Supervised school heads on curriculum implementation and
    instructional delivery.
    C. Curriculum Development and Innovations
    1. Provided leadership/technical assistance in the development /
    redevelopment of teaching and learning resources.
    2. Initiated innovations in curriculum implementation
    3. Provided access and equitable distribution of !s from the !
    Portal/"#$ modules %$IS&S"/'"S'( to schools )ithin the
    district
    D. Staff Development
    1. Provided technical assistance and support for school*based
    training and development activities.
    2. +oordinated )ith the division to implement do)nloaded training
    programs
    E. Performance Assessment/Efficiency
    Internal Efficiency Indicators of the district:
    1. Increased ,"- $PS of the district by 2.
    2. Increased promotion rate by 2.
    3. #ecreased repetition rate by 2.
    /. #ecreased drop*out rate by 2.
    0. Increased survival rate 2.
    1. Increased retention rate 2.
    . !esearch and Data "anagement
    "% +onducted action research, shared and used results
    2. $anaged #istrict 2'IS
    #. Supervision of Private Schools
    1. Increased number/. of Private Schools %'lem./Sec.( in the
    district )ith #ep'# recognition/permit to operate
    TOTAL SCORE
    TOTAL RATING (T%ta& S'%() *18 + #0$
    II" PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL
    CHARACTERISTICS , 20$
    III" ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY -
    10$
    1
    0

    8

    6

    4

    2
    R 1
    0
    8 6 4 2 R
    "% Decisiveness "% P&nct&alit'
    % (onest'/$ntegrit' % Attendance
    3% Dedication/)ommitment *otal Score
    +% $nitiative/Reso&rce,&lnes
    s
    T%ta& Rati!
    (TS*2+10$
    -% )o&rtes'
    .% (&man Relations
    /% 0eadershi1
    2% Stress *olerance
    3% Fairness/4&stness
    "!%Pro1er Attire/ 5ood
    5rooming
    *otal Score
    T%ta& Rati! (TS*10+ 20$
    P&./ Fa't%(/0 6!%- ,or each indicator 7&t not to e8ceed 1oints ,or the total9
    "% )haired technical committee in the division/regional level
    % )ond&cted seminars in the division/regional level
    3% Acted as trainer/,acilitator in the division/regional level
    +% Ac:&ired reso&rces/assistance ,or the school ,rom other so&rces
    SUMMARY OF RATINGS0
    $% ;cc&1ational )om1etence 6/!<9 _________
    $$% Pro,essional and Personal )haracteristics 6!<9
    _________
    $$$% P&nct&alit' and Attendance 6"!<9 _________
    *otal _________
    Pl&s Factor _________
    ;ver-All Rating _________
    Descri1tive Rating _________
    RE=AR>S:
    __________________________________________________________________________________
    RA*EE: );NFERRED ?$*(:

    ________________________
    ____________________
    Rater
    );NF;R=E: __________________
    Signat&re o, Ratee
    ____________________
    Rater
    ____________________
    Rater
    RE#$E?ED @ RE);==END$N5 APPR;#A0:

    _____________________
    ESA (ead
    APPR;#ED:
    __________________________
    Schools Division S&1erintendent
    __________________________________________________________________________________
    ___
    >e' to Descri1tive Rating
    2%.! - "!%! - ;&tstanding
    .%.! - 2%-3 - #er' Satis,actor'
    +%.! - .%-3 - Satis,actor'
    %.! - +%-3 - Ansatis,actor'
    %-3 @ 7eloB - Poor

    You might also like