Bill TR Eh Arne Interview

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

www.asse.

org JUNE 2011 ProfessionalSafety 63


PS: Describe your professional back-
ground and your position as director of
engineering and administration for Mid-
west Steel Inc.
William: I am responsible for safety compliance,
estimating, engineering, quality compliance and
overall administration. I have more than 40 years
safety experience and hold a B.S. in Civil Engi-
neering from Michigan State University.
PS: What is your role on the A10.13 stan-
dard subcommittee for steel erection?
William: As chair, I lead the A10.13 subcom-
mittees efforts to develop a revised standard
periodically to keep it current with the latest
technological advancements and safety strategies.
I submit the efforts to the full A10 committee for
ballot and work through all negative ballots for f-
nal publication of the standard. I also obtain input
from the committee on any interpretation issues
and report it to the A10 committee secretary.
PS: What SH&E hazards can workers en-
counter during the handling and disman-
tling of structural steel?
William: Erecting structural steel creates many
safety issues. Fall protection is the biggest chal-
lenge, but there are many ways to get hurt. Site
conditions also present major challenges as only
stable ground conditions can support equipment
and steel members set on the ground until they
can be raised into the air. Electrical wires in the
erection area also can be a hazard if they cannot
be shut down.
PS: On average, how many of the occupa-
tional injuries that occur in the construc-
tion industry each year are related to
working with structural steel? What types
of injuries are most common?
William: No real reliable data exist on the num-
ber of injuries or fatalities in steel erection, and
any available data are many years old. In 2001,
OSHA estimated that 35 ironworkers are killed
each year and that another 2,300 suffered lost
workday injuries.
Since that time, I hope we are doing a much
better job, but I always question any published
data due to a poor data collection system. Falls
generally cause the most severe injuries fol-
lowed by caught-in-between-type injuries, such
as getting limbs caught in between man-baskets
and steel, and beams rolling over due to unstable
ground conditions. Strains are also an issue,
as iron work is similar to an athletic endeavor
where one must push or pull to get something in
place when the ironworkers body is in a diffcult
position. Eyes and hands are a concern when
one pounds on something and it slips or breaks.
Walking and working surfaces cause their share
of injuries (e.g., slips or strained knees, backs),
especially during inclement weather conditions,
such as rain or snow.
PS: The A10.13 standard, Safety Require-
ments for Steel Erection, was recently re-
vised. What new changes does the revised
standard include?
William: Most of the changes were related to
best safety practices, such as defning equipment
used in steel erection, emphasizing better precon-
struction planning and elimination of concrete
and anchor rod problems that result in severe in-
juries, use of both the English and metric systems,
adding more decking requirements, such as wind
tacking, and upgrading the language to refect
current safety terms and ideas.
PS: What challenges did the A10.13 sub-
committee encounter during the revision
process and how did it resolve them?
William: Part of the
subcommittee wanted
to allow specially trained
steel connectors to ride
the headache ball under
very limited and controlled
circumstances. We fnally
got the subcommittee to
go along with it but then
did not sell this to the full
committee.
The headache ball is a
round ball of steel located
just above the hook on a
crane. Ironworkers often
stand on it, allowing the
crane operator to raise
them to the steel in the air.
It was outlawed because
there were no rules and
sometimes several work-
ers would climb on the
ball, which creates a dangerous situation.
Riding the headache ball is allowed in Michi-
gan, again under some very limited and controlled
Safety Requirements for Steel Erection
Standards Insider
William H. Treharne
William H. Treharne, P.E., is director of engineering and administration for Midwest Steel Inc. and chair of the A10.13 stan-
dard subcommittee for steel erection. Throughout his career, William has held the positions of structural engineer, chief
engineer, erection manager, general manager (fabrication division), general manager (construction division), chief estima-
tor and vice president of operations. He also has experience in structural steel erection, steel and aluminum mill building,
design and build projects, structural alterations to industrial plants, bridge erection and repairs, material handling system
installation, including extensive experience in crane runway repairs and alterations and automated storage and retrieval
system rack building design and build projects. He holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Michigan State University.
Hotlinks
AISC American Institute of Steel
Construction www.aisc.org
ANSI American National Standards
Institute www.a.org
Ironworkers International Association
of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and
Reinforcing Iron Workers
www.ironworkers.org
MW Steel Inc. Midwest Steel Inc.
www.midweststeel.com
64 ProfessionalSafety JUNE 2011 www.asse.org
circumstances. It is a safe procedure
when used properly and will prevent
injuries and fatalities. But this is a
consensus document, and other people
prevailed.
PS: What do you consider
to be the most impor-
tant revision made to the
A10.13 standard and why?
William: The emphasis on
preplanning or building safety
into the construction of steel
structures will result in safer
jobs and jobsites. This leads to
having the equipment on the
job when it is needed, and it leads to
training and communicating to people
on the specifc task they perform at that
time.
PS: How will the A10.13 subcom-
mittee work to have the revised
standard recognized by govern-
ment agencies?
William: This task is way above the
This Is A Safety Moment!
TM
has the answers!
kespectful
communicotion
The best woy to open
o sofety conversotion
3 techniques to provide
feedbock respectfully
3 woys to respond to
sofety feedbock
Closing sofety
conversotions
Lots of exomples
Dovid Fronces, Fh.D. is the outhor of This Is A Safety Moment!
A psychologist ond monogement consultont, Dr. Fronces
hos troined thousonds of employees to communicote
more effectively, for results.
Order a copy of This Is A Safety Moment!
at thisisasafetymoment.com or call 781-935-5423
For more information about onsite training call 781-935-5423.
1-4pgAd2.indd 1 3/30/11 8:38 PM
subcommittee, as the subcommittee
concentrates on the technical aspects of
the standard. The full A10 committee
relies on the secretariats expertise to
market and sell the standard. This stan-
dard covers much more than OSHA
Subpart R on Steel Erection.
PS: How can the revised A10.13
standard best be incorporated
into construction SH&E practic-
es? At what point in a construc-
tion project should the A10.13
standard be used?
TRAINING INSTITUTE
EDUCATION CENTER
a cooperal|ve prograr ol lre u.3. 0eparlrerl
ol Laoor, 03lA ard Keere 3lale Co||ege
OSHA Outreach
Training
OSHA Standards
Train-the-Trainer
Short-term TechnicaI Courses:
Corslrucl|or 0erera| lrduslry
Var|l|re 0|sasler 3|le wor|er
Certihcate Programs
lor your proless|ora| deve|oprerl
800.449.08hA (742} [ oshaedkeene.edu
WWW.edcenter.cor
William: The A10.13 standard is
written and developed for companies
and craftspeople so that they may erect
steel structures and metal deck in a safe
and effective manner. When
used, it can prevent injuries and
fatalities. Effective, safe erection
methods must be planned. All
equipment and personnel safety
protection systems should be
issued and used properly by
trained and skilled craftspeople
with safe behaviors.
PS: What are your long-
term expectations for the
revised A10.13 standard?
William: The industry continues to
improve with better equipment and
safety systems and the craftspeople are
getting better trained and educated (at
least in the union sector, with which
I am familiar), so I see a continuously
evolving standard that refects current
safety thinking and new technology.
Standards Insider
The craftspeople are getting bet-
ter trained and educated, so I see
a continuously evolving standard
that refects current safety
thinking and new technology.

You might also like