High Speed Rail: MSC Transportation Engineering and Planning (PT)
High Speed Rail: MSC Transportation Engineering and Planning (PT)
High Speed Rail: MSC Transportation Engineering and Planning (PT)
Contents
1.
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3
2.
3.
4.
CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 4
1. INTRODUCTION
In this briefing note the analysis of high speed rail are presented with respect to the benefits
provided by this travel mode. Many countries have developed high-speed rail to connect major
cities, including Belgium, Britain, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain,
Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey and the United States.
2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The railway system in the UK is the oldest in the world, with the first public railway opening in 1825.
Most of the railway track is managed by Network Rail, which in 2014 had a network of 15,753km of
standard gauge lines of which 5,268 km has been electrified. These lines range from single, double
and quadruple track. In addition, some cities have rail-based mass transit systems such as the
historical London Underground and the recently opened overland line which connects from Watford
Junction in the north to West Croydon in the south. The British railway network is linked to with
continental Europe by an undersea rail link, the Channel Tunnel Link, which was opened in 1994.i
The majority of the rail network in Britain consists of lines constructed during the Victorian era,
which are limited to speeds no greater than 200 kilometres per hour.
High-speed rail arrived in the United Kingdom with the opening in 2003 of the first part of High
Speed 1 (then known as the 108-kilometre Channel Tunnel Rail Link) between London and the
Channel Tunnel. International passenger services are currently provided by Eurostar, with journey
times of London St Pancras to Paris Gare du Nord in 2 hours 15 minutes, and St Pancras to BrusselsSouth in 1 hour 51 minutesii, using a fleet of multi-system trains capable of 300 kilometres per hour.
This service not only caters for international passengers but also for domestic passengers travelling
to the towns and cities in Kent and includes provision for the movement of freight.
The main advantages of rail travel over other modes is that it is an eco-friendly way to get around.
All major cities in the world have rail connections linking to countless local and commuter services.
Trains allow you to travel in safety and comfort, and their old-worldly charm sets them apart from
more mundane means of transport. They pollute less, rarely suffer from weather delays and will not
give you jet lag. You can talk to your companions, read a book, or have a snooze and even catch-up
on some work from the office.
The recent increases in the population growth places a huge demand on existing infrastructure and
the available modes of travel. Do we build more homes, towns, and cities with new infrastructure?
Do we widen our existing road network, which may at some future stage become gridlocked? Do we
look at alternative ways of getting people from point A to point B in a shorter space of time? The
current trends are leading towards high speed rail travel as one viable option.
London has seen substantial mode shift from private to public transport since 2000, as has been
documented in TfLs series of Travel in London reports. Of particular note is the trend in car travel,
which has fallen by around 15 per cent from its 1999 peak, even while Londons population has been
growing. Since 2000, public transport modes have all seen increases in passenger numbers to
varying degrees, with the number of trips on London Underground up by 20 per cent, trips by
National Rail in London up over 50 per cent, and bus trips increasing by 70 per cent (see Appendix A
Figure 1).iii
Page | 3
Baber Beg
Student ID: 3301044
4.
CONCLUSION
From having researched the material relating to high speed rail, the conclusion can be drawn that
the overall effect on the economy of the UK would mainly be beneficial. There are future plans to
extend HSR further north into Scotland. However, the costs of travelling on the HSR must be
subsided either by the Government or Private Entrepreneurs in some way to encourage and
promote this as a viable alternative mode of travel within the UK.
Page | 4
Baber Beg
Student ID: 3301044
The main considerations to promote in the further development of high speed rail are the time
savings provide, the environmental friendly mode of travel, the cost benefits, the reliability of the
train services, and the connectivity between the cities and places of interest and the long term
benefits that high speed rail will bring to the economy of the UK.
REFERENCES
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Great_Britain
"Eurostar to launch passenger services at St Pancras International on Wednesday 14 November 2007"
(Press release). Eurostar. 14 November 2006
Drivers of Demand for Travel in London: A review of trends in travel demand and their causes
Topham, Gwyn (11 April 2012). "HS2 revises down economic benefits of 33bn railway". The Guardian
(London).
High Speed Two Ltd (11 March 2010). "High Speed Rail London to the West Midlands and Beyond: A
Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/11043893/Rail-fare-hike-Britainvs-rest-of-Europe.html
Page | 5
APPENDIX A - FIGURES
Baber Beg
Student ID: 3301044
Figure 2: Diagrammatic representation of HS1 and HS2 in UK and France with proposed links (not to scale)
Baber Beg
Student ID: 3301044
Baber Beg
Student ID: 3301044