Construction and Building Materials: Kazim Turk
Construction and Building Materials: Kazim Turk
Construction and Building Materials: Kazim Turk
h i g h l i g h t s
" To provide greater sustainability in construction, use of mineral admixtures is inevitable.
" Thus, there will be pressures to maximize their effectiveness in many respects.
" Use of ternary blends improved the deciencies of SCMs with binary blends of y ash.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 23 March 2012
Received in revised form 9 July 2012
Accepted 22 July 2012
Available online 5 September 2012
Keywords:
Fly ash
Silica fume
Self-compacting mortar
Viscosity
Hardened properties
a b s t r a c t
The paper presented herein investigates the effects of using supplementary cementitious materials in binary and ternary blends on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting mortars (SCMs). For this
purpose, a total of 25 mortar mixtures were designed having a total binder content of 640 kg/m3 and
water/binder ratio between 0.41 and 0.50. The control mixture contained only Portland cement (PC) as
the binder while the remaining mixtures incorporated binary and ternary cementitious blends of PC, y
ash (FA) and silica fume (SF). After mixing, the fresh properties of the mortars were tested for slump ow,
V-funnel ow time and viscosity. Moreover, compressive and exural tensile strengths of the hardened
mortars were measured at 28 and 91 days whilst dry unit weight and the dynamic modulus of elasticity
tests were performed at 28 days. Test results have revealed that at high shear rates, the uidity of mortars
increased regardless of the dosage and type of mineral admixtures. Also, ternary mixtures generally predominated the respective binary mixtures in terms of viscosity. The compressive strength of the control
mortar performed better than binary blends of FA and all ternary mortars whilst the exural tensile
strength of the control mortar was in general higher than all binary and ternary mortars for all curing ages.
The ternary use of PC, SF and FA improved the deciencies of SCMs with binary blends of FA. Moreover,
increases in SF and FA contents caused a decrease in 28-day dynamic modulus of elasticity of the mortars
with binary and ternary blends.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Self-compacting mortars, as new technology products, are
especially preferred for the rehabilitation and repair of reinforced
concrete structures [1]. To place the fresh mortar without any external compaction and at the same time without causing any segregation, the water/cementitious materials ratio of mortar and the type
of chemical admixtures should be determined. In other words, the
paste phase rheology of repair mortar should possess suitable properties from the viewpoint of owability and segregation [25]. In
addition to these, the self-compactability of mortars may provide
considerable advantages such as reducing the construction time
and labor cost, enhancing the lling capacity of highly congested
Tel.: +90 4143440020x1473; fax: +90 4143440031.
E-mail addresses: kturk23@hotmail.com, kturk@harran.edu.tr
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.081
327
Table 1
Chemical composition and physical properties of PC, FA and SF.
Component
PC
FA
SF
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
Chloride (Cl)
LOI
Specic gravity
Specic surface area (cm2/g)
20.2
5.8
3.23
64.1
2.66
0.006
2.58
3.1
3484
58.82
19.65
10.67
2.18
3.92
0.48
0.91
2.08
3812
91
0.58
0.24
0.71
0.33
1.84
2.2
96.5% < 45 lm
E V 2 q=g 102
where E is the modulus of elasticity (GPa), V is the ultrasonic velocity (km/s), q is the density of mortar secimens (kg/m3) and g is the
acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2) [25]. After demolding, all
specimens were cured in water at room temperature (21 2 C)
until testing.
328
Table 2
Weights of constituents of the mixtures.
Mixture codes
W/CM (%)
PC (%)
FA (%)
SF (%)
Binder (kg/m3)
Sand 02 mm (kg/m3)
HRWR (kg/m3)
Control
FA25
FA30
FA35
FA40
SF5
SF10
SF15
SF20
SF5FA25
SF5FA30
SF5FA35
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF10FA30
SF10FA35
SF10FA40
SF15FA25
SF15FA30
SF15FA35
SF15FA40
SF20FA25
SF20FA30
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
0.45
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.44
0.45
0.47
0.50
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.46
100
75
70
65
60
95
90
85
80
70
65
60
55
65
60
55
50
60
55
50
45
55
50
45
40
0
25
30
35
40
0
0
0
0
25
30
35
40
25
30
35
40
25
30
35
40
25
30
35
40
0
0
0
0
0
5
10
15
20
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
20
20
20
20
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
640
1227
1194
1181
1168
1155
1230
1203
1159
1106
1174
1193
1185
1180
1169
1174
1166
1164
1148
1143
1140
1143
1072
1069
1061
1056
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Table 3
Fresh properties and dry unit weight of SCMs.
Mixture codes
Control
FA25
FA30
FA35
FA40
SF5
SF10
SF15
SF20
SF5FA25
SF5FA30
SF5FA35
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF10FA30
SF10FA35
SF10FA40
SF15FA25
SF15FA30
SF15FA35
SF15FA40
SF20FA25
SF20FA30
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
24.7
24.1
24.2
24.7
25.0
24.2
24.4
24.1
24.4
25.0
24.2
24.4
24.1
24.3
24.2
24.3
24.9
24.3
24.0
24.2
24.7
24.5
24.2
24.9
24.4
7.1
11.0
12.0
12.0
14.8
7.0
5.5
4.0
3.5
7.5
8.0
10.0
10.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
9.0
4.0
4.0
4.2
5.0
1.9
2.3
3.0
3.5
2129
2043
2023
2005
1999
2118
2107
2088
2071
2063
2047
2033
2032
2066
2030
2015
1999
2035
2016
2014
2005
1992
1932
1930
1896
711
opening of the bottom outlet and the time when the light becomes
visible from the bottom, when observed from the top. Deformability and viscosity of the mixtures was evaluated through the measurement of mini slump ow diameter and mini V-funnel ow
time. The workability values and unit weight of fresh mortar mixtures and EFNARC [20] limits are summarized in Table 3.
Viscosity measurements were performed using a Brookeld DVE model viscometer. It is a rotational viscometer with a smoothwalled concentric cylinder so that at low stress values, wall slip
(nearly yield stress) occurs resulting in inaccurately low yield
stress measurements. Slip appeared to be more inuential at low
329
16
y = -0.004x + 24.36
2
R = 0.65
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2750
3000
3250
3500
3750
4000
4250
4500
4750
5000
5250
l a cb
330
30000
Control
FA25
FA30
FA35
FA40
SF5
SF10
SF15
SF20
25000
Viscosity (cP)
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1
2.5
10
20
50
60
100
(a)
30000
Control
SF5FA25
SF5FA30
SF5FA35
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF10FA30
SF10FA35
SF10FA40
Viscosity (cP)
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1
2.5
10
20
50
60
100
(b)
30000
Control
SF15FA25
SF15FA30
SF15FA35
SF15FA40
SF20FA25
SF20FA30
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
Viscosity (cP)
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1
2.5
10
20
50
60
100
331
with binary blends of SF, because y ash had lower unit weight
with 2.08 gr/cm3 compared to that of silica fume (i.e., density or
specic gravity).
Table 4
Compressive and exural tensile strength of all SCMs at 28 and 91 days.
Compressive strength (MPa)
28 days
91 days
28 days
91 days
55.9
52.2
46.3
44.1
41.6
52.6
57.6
56.8
56.5
48.3
46.2
40.4
43.7
46.2
44.0
46.5
46.2
48.7
47.4
49.8
49.2
48.5
48.7
38.1
38.0
60.6
56.9
56.1
47.5
48.9
60.3
62.6
63.5
65.2
53.0
51.5
54.0
53.7
56.1
54.9
51.9
54.8
50.0
49.7
53.0
56.0
57.2
52.7
49.7
46.4
10.3
7.5
7.3
7.1
6.8
7.5
8.4
8.7
9.2
8.4
7.6
7.7
7.3
8.8
8.5
7.9
7.7
8.7
8.6
8.0
7.5
8.9
7.9
7.1
7.4
11.2
9.0
8.7
8.6
8.3
9.8
10.1
10.6
11.4
9.0
8.8
8.9
8.5
9.5
8.7
8.2
8.2
8.9
9.1
9.1
9.9
9.9
9.3
7.9
8.4
10
28 days
91 days
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
SF20FA40
SF20FA30
SF20FA35
SF20FA25
SF15FA40
SF15FA30
SF15FA35
SF15FA25
SF10FA35
SF10FA40
SF10FA30
SF10FA25
SF5FA35
SF5FA30
SF20
SF5FA25
SF15
SF5
FA35
FA40
FA30
-35
SF10
-30
FA25
SF5FA40
Control
FA25
FA30
FA35
FA40
SF5
SF10
SF15
SF20
SF5FA25
SF5FA30
SF5FA35
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF10FA30
SF10FA35
SF10FA40
SF15FA25
SF15FA30
SF15FA35
SF15FA40
SF20FA25
SF20FA30
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
Mixture code
Fig. 4. Percent difference in compressive strength of SCMs with binary and ternary blends of FA and SF at 28 and 91 days.
28 days
91 days
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
SF20FA25
SF20FA30
SF15FA40
SF15FA35
SF15FA30
SF10FA40
SF15FA25
SF10FA35
SF10FA30
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF5FA30
SF5FA35
SF5FA25
SF15
SF20
SF5
SF10
FA35
FA25
-35
FA40
-30
FA30
332
Mixture codes
Fig. 5. Percent difference in exural tensile strength of SCMs with binary and ternary blends of FA and SF at 28 and 91 days.
-5
-10
-15
SF20FA35
SF20FA40
SF20FA30
SF20FA25
SF15FA40
SF15FA35
SF15FA30
SF15FA25
SF10FA40
SF10FA35
SF10FA30
SF5FA40
SF10FA25
SF5FA35
SF5FA30
SF5FA25
SF20
SF15
SF5
SF10
FA35
FA30
FA25
-25
FA40
-20
Mixture codes
Fig. 6. Dynamic elasticity of SCMs with binary and ternary blends of FA and SF at 28 days.
60
55
50
45
Binary blends
40
Ternary blends
35
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
mortar performed better than all of binary mortars for all curing
ages except for SF20 mixture at the ages of 91-day. With
increasing amount of FA content, difference in the exural tensile strength of the mortar with binary blends of FA increased.
However, for the mortar with binary blends of SF this nding
is not valid. Because, the FA is somewhat coarser so it is a little
slower to react [36]. It can clearly be seen from Fig. 5 that the
ternary use of mineral admixtures improved the deciencies of
SCMs with binary blends of FA. Indeed, the incorporation of SF
with FA in ternary blends in general decreased the difference
in the exural tensile strength compared to the mortar with
binary blends of FA.
4. Conclusions
Based on the data developed and results in this study the following conclusions may be drawn:
1. V-funnel time reduced with increase in SF content in binary
mixtures whilst the owability of mortars reduced when the
amount of cement replaced by FA increased. However, the use
of ternary cementitious blends of SF and FA reduced this effect.
2. It can be emphasized that at high deformation rates, owable
behaviour was dominant regardless of the dosage and type of
mineral admixtures. Moreover, the energy needed to reach a
owable consistency should be lower for FA rather than SF
incorporated mortars with binary blends, especially at high
rotational speeds.
3. The ternary mixtures generally predominated the respective
binary mixtures in terms of viscosity. Because, all SCMs with
ternary cementitious blends had higher viscosity than that of
the control mixture at all rotational speed except for 1 rpm
although the viscosity of binary FA mortars was less than that
of the control mixture except for FA40 at 1 rpm.
4. Dry unit weight of the mortar decreased with an increase in the
mineral admixtures content due to their low unit weight compared to that of cement.
5. The compressive strength of the control mortar performed better than binary blends of FA and all ternary mortars whilst the
exural tensile strength of the control mortar was in general
higher than all binary and ternary mortars for all curing ages.
Moreover, the ternary use of PC, SF and FA improved the deciencies of SCMs with binary blends of FA.
6. Increase in SF and FA contents caused a decrease in the dynamic
modulus of elasticity of the mortars with binary and ternary
blends whilst the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the control
mortar performed better than all mortars with SF and FA. Moreover, there is a very good correlation between the dynamic
333
334
[32] Caliskan S. Aggregate/mortar interface: inuence of silica fume at the microand macro-level. Cem Concr Compos 2003;25:55764.
[33] Turk K, Caliskan S, Yazicioglu S. Capillary water absorption of self-compacting
concrete under different curing conditions. Indian J Eng Mater Sci
2007;14:36572.
[34] Guneyisi E, Gesoglu M. Properties of self-compacting mortars with binary and
ternary cementitious blends of y ash and metakaolin. Mater Struct
2008;41:151931.