A Survey of Pharmacy NHS Health Check Provision in England
A Survey of Pharmacy NHS Health Check Provision in England
A Survey of Pharmacy NHS Health Check Provision in England
Table of Contents
1. Introduction:................................................................................................................................2
1.1 Aims and Objectives:.................................................................................................................4
2. Literature Review........................................................................................................................5
2.1 Contribution made by the community pharmacy...................................................................6
2.1.1 Healthy Lifestyle.............................................................................................................6
2.1.2 Reduction of Smoking.....................................................................................................7
2.1.2 Reduction in Alcohol related ill effects or harm.............................................................7
2.1.3 Reduction of Alcohol misuse among the teenagers.........................................................8
2.2 The (HLP) Healthy living Pharmacy.........................................................................................8
2.2.1 Prevention...............................................................................................................................9
2.2.2 Testing and Screening...........................................................................................................10
The health checks of NHS.............................................................................................................10
2.2.3 Spreading Awareness............................................................................................................11
2.2.3.1 Cancer................................................................................................................................11
2.2.3.2 Immunisation.....................................................................................................................12
3. Research methodology...............................................................................................................12
4. Discussions................................................................................................................................14
5. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................16
References......................................................................................................................................16
Abstract
The research paper highlights the promotion of the NHS health check provision so that
NHS can make aware of the advantages of the health promotion campaigns which have
been organized by NHS Health provision located in England, UK. The research paper also
focuses on the different methods used for the conduction of the research so that the quality
of the research can be maintained. It also highlights the role of the pharmacists indulging
in changing the health habits of the people in UK. It also identifies the risk factors by the
promotion and the implementation of the health checkups in the UK. The NHS also
demonstrates the factors through which the lifestyle of the people in UK has been changed.
The study also illustrates the statistical assumptions which results in the findings of the
positive impacts on the lifestyle of the people of England, UK.
1. Introduction:
Healthcare is the cornerstone of the socialist state. It is the crown jewel of the welfare state. Monica Crowley
National Health Service is the most famous public funded healthcare systems in United
Kingdom. It is the largest and the oldest healthcare systems in the entire nation. National Health
Service is funded by the general taxation system and provides free medical services to all the
legal residents of United Kingdom (Norton, 2006). There is also emergency treatment and
treatment for infectious diseases which is absolutely free for all the denizens as well as the
visitors. NHS was founded in 1948 and since then it has controlled the entire health sector in
UK. The most promising way through which NHS carried out its campaigns since its inception is
through several videos for health awareness. NHS also carried out several video campaigns about
the hazards of smoking in human life and also informed the masses about the benefits of walking
to improvise the health condition of the people.
In UK public health is the most crucial concern as it is huge concern these days for so many
health issues in peoples life and it is directly affecting the heath and economy of the nation as
well. The UK Government has also become very serious and has proposed several policies in
order to undergo proper healthcare services in entire UK. In this study we have focused on the
community pharmacy which serves as the providers for the NHS health check program which
was conducted in 2009. Through NHS almost 10500 community pharmacies are providing health
care services throughout UK. This is the most promising strategies by NHS to provide the best
healthcare care service in entire UK is through the help of the community pharmacies. Now the
most promising feature of these community pharmacies is that they are located not only in the
heart of city but also in the small towns, rural as well as the inner backward cities. Here the
people have limited medical and health facility and this is the reason why they are quite
backward related to the healthcare awareness among themselves as well as their children.
There have been several growing opportunities available for the community pharmacy in the
public healthcare services through NHS health checks. They focus on the important areas of
alcohol and drug misuses among the teenage and younger generation of the society. We all know
that these days drugs and alcohol is the most crucial issues which the parents face for their under
aged and younger children. This not only affects their health but also their future as well. This is
the reason why so many rehabilitation centers are being opened to recover the health condition of
the people who are affected by drugs and alcohol. The community pharmacies conduct several
health campaign sessions and undergo lots of events in order to spread the awareness among the
people regarding consumption of alcohol, drugs and tobacco. Teenage girls are also trained about
premature pregnancy which is another crucial issues found among the young girls these days.
They also conduct several healthy lifestyle events and also increased the intake of seasonal flu
vaccination. Now if we consider the successful implementation of public healthcare services, a
community pharmacy plays a major role to conduct them as they are easily accessible among the
local masses of that region and this result in huge positive response to these health campaigns
among the people.
The NHS Health Check programme which was conducted in 2009 was initiated to understand the
risk of growing coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. This targeted
mainly the population of age between 40 and 74 years and this was supported by the Public
Health England. Commissioning of pharmacy-based NHS Health Checks was initially the
cancellation of Primary Care Trusts; however it shifted to Local Authorities in April 2013. So the
remote areas took the opportunity of using the pharmacists over there. However in many areas
pharmacies were not used at all to conduct NHS health checkups. However if gone deep into the
research, not much has been published about the health checkups conducted by the NHS Health
Checks in entire England.
To conduct more healthcare campaigns in order to spread awareness among the teenagers
and the younger generations in England to stop the usage of drugs and alcohol and
educate them about the drastic effects of it in their health as well as future.
To conduct healthier lifestyle events to reach the backward class of the society and those
areas who are not much aware about the general and crucial healthcare services and the
which the people mostly face over there and the facilities of which they are deprived of.
To extricate the funding problems which the people in the rural areas and the remote
cities face to undergo the health treatments and the emergency health issues. NHS is
looking forward to provide more free medical and healthcare services specifically to the
So NHS Health Checks need to concentrate on all these prime objectives and set their future
goals so that they successfully conduct the healthcare services in entire England and so that the
people in both urban and rural areas are more aware of the crucial health problems and are also
educated with the basic prevention activities in order escape these problems and make a better
place to live in.
2. Literature Review
Literature review can be significantly expressed as the overall evaluation or report of the
significant information or data obtained or gathered in the context of the particular research study
or research topic. The section of literature review extensively elaborates or highlights the various
evaluations or discussions of the several past observations, studies or researches that have been
comprehensively conducted on the undertaken field of research study. Literature review can be
effectively and extensively considered to be a crucial segment of the undertaken research study
that significantly highlights or showcases the importance and relevance of the undertaken
research topic. The literature review section has extensively showcased the overall importance of
pharmacy NHS health check provision in the nation of England. In this section of literature
review, the researcher has significantly studied, assessed and analyzed the past observations,
researches and other studies that holds significant relevance to the undertaken research study and
have been published in various journals or articles. The literature review segment provides the
researcher with an extensive theoretical overview or concept regarding the undertaken research
which comprehensively enables the respective researcher to conduct the overall research in the
most efficient, accurate and appropriate manner.
2.1 Contribution made by the community pharmacy
Community pharmacy can be effectively considered to make significant and extensive
contribution to the overall public health in the nation of England. Community pharmacy is seen
to play a major role in preventing or generating the rightful and proper awareness among the
public regarding various health issues which can significantly lead to severe diseases among the
individuals. The overall contribution made by the community pharmacy in public health can be
comprehensively explained as follows:
2.1.1 Healthy Lifestyle
It can be widely estimated that healthcare services contribute to nearly one third of the overall
life expectancy improvements, while changing the overall lifestyle of the people and eradication
of the various health inequalities significantly contributes to the rest one third. Obesity and
diabetes which are considered to be the biggest threats towards health are extensively related
with public health. The four basic factors that can be considered to be the significant behavioral
contributor towards various preventable diseases can be listed as follows:
Use of tobacco.
Physical inactivity.
Poor diet.
Excess consumption of alcohol.
2.1.2 Reduction of Smoking
Smoking can be considered to be the major significant cause behind premature death and
preventable morbidity in the nation of England. Smoking is forecasted to be significantly
responsible for more than 86,000 deaths in England on a yearly basis. The National Health
Services (NHS), spends around 2.75 billion GBP on an annual basis for treating smoking related
diseases and illness. Generating awareness among the public in relation to the ill effects of
smoking have become a prior concern towards eradicating the smoking related health problems
and issues in the nation of England. Over the years NHS has modified their overall smoking
services by modification of various treatment norms and protocols and enhancing the overall
treatment that are delivered to the community pharmacies. The community pharmacies are
responsible for generating the right awareness among the people regarding the ill effects of
smoking and have the capacity to reach out to a wide number of people who indulge themselves
in smoking.
2.1.2 Reduction in Alcohol related ill effects or harm
The rate of alcohol abuse has significantly risen in the nation of England over the last decade and
has continued to be one of the major significant reasons behind various health issues among the
overall population. Thus prevention of ill effects of alcohol and other harms related to alcohol
have become a major imperative of public health in the nation of England, United Kingdom
(UK). Misuse of alcohol can be considered to be a huge burden on the overall public as well as
health sector systems in context of both the cost related to treatment of diseases related to alcohol
as well as the overall impact of alcohol abuse on hospitals and other primary cares. For
significant reduction in alcohol related harm it is extensively necessary to identify the root causes
of hazardous drinking and implement proper strategies for controlling the causes. On a yearly
basis National Health Services (NHS), are reported to spend around 2.5 billion GBP for
reduction of health problems or issues related to alcohol abuse in the near future.
hygienic place to live in. The quality services that HLP directs and provides help in contributing
towards providing health improving remedies that assists local communities to reduce the
inequalities that can be a major back hold for the societys health standards.
According to Bradley and Burls, 2000; one of the major objectives that HLP (Healthy Living
Pharmacy) serves is the objectives of promoting various methods and procedure of a healthy
living and several methods and procedure that will help local communities to improve their
standard of health.
In the geographical region of Portsmouth, United Kingdom, the PCT has helped the local
communities with an establishment of several HLPs (Healthy Living Pharmacies) that helped the
communities to improve their health condition by facilitating various services that are public
health oriented. They also have their several staffs that are trained in a special way that makes
them champions as of health training. This has helped the regional people of the Portsmouth to
improve their health standards using some special sort of training and procedure.
2.2.1 Prevention
As stated by Brown R in the year of 1973; the local community pharmacies play vital role in
the spreading the awareness among people of various communities. They perform a smart role
play in how to aware people regarding the disadvantage of illness of several diseases. They
forecast the reaction of community people regarding the effect of the disease and act accordingly.
They perform resting along with some screening procedure and then they immunise people of
those diseases. Local Community Pharmacies are solely responsible for spreading awareness of
healthy living and the procedure and way people can lead a healthy life. To test and screen
people that are aged between the ages of 40-74 and improve their health condition by providing
them various health improving methods and procedures that in the longer run will be beneficial
for them. Prevention is always better than cure is the conception HLPs (Healthy Living
Pharmacy) follow for every community they serve in.
2.2.3.1 Cancer
According to Chacko in the year of 1979. The most feared disease and one of the primary
reasons that world has seen deaths that are untimely and uncertain. Although, results have shown
that if diagnosed on time lives can be saved but if its too late to discover the symptoms and is
not diagnosed on time it becomes hard for the medical professional to save a life. There are
researches that show that there are several methods that can help people to cure from the chances
of cancer. There are several situations that have the maximum potential to a human to catch the
chances of Cancer. Smoking being of the major reason that cause the cancer among people
aged from 15-30 and there are several other condition where human can have the chances of
infected by cancer. Improving diet chart and the food article those are in the food chart,
increasing activities that are physical greater than ever can help people to reduce the chances of
cancer that they can get infected by.
According to Coleman M in the year of 1999. Skin cancer being one of the top kinds that
affect more than any other kind of the cancer and it does affect young people aged from 15-24
and it also is observed that people do get affect by skin cancer majorly by Sun bed.
Community pharmacy can help community people to spread awareness regarding the effects of
Cancer and let people decide for their own health. Local community pharmacies play an
important role in making people aware of the severe effects of the Cancer and how deadly can
the effects be. Pharmacies can spread information over the remedies that people can use for the
purpose of helping people understand the concept of Cancer and how the remedies they provided
can help them to be safe from the deadly effects of cancer.
2.2.3.2 Immunisation
Immunisation is the procedure of making people aware and making people invincible from
deadly diseases. It is the procedure of facilitating community people with vital preventive
measures that can help them to protect themselves from various deadly diseases. It thus is vital
for the pharmacy to spread awareness regarding the deadly effects of various diseases that can
severely affect them and even can cause their death. Vaccination at well in advance, appropriate
training procedure and spreading awareness regarding the importance of cleanliness can help the
community to be healthy and people within the community to be protected from various deadly
diseases. There are various reasons regarding why people can get affected by various diseases,
sudden temperature change, dirt all round in the neighbourhood, smoking in a huge amount,
drinking in a huge quantity, are some of the major reason that can cause people to get affected by
the several deadly diseases.
According to Davis, H. and Martin, S. (2008); there are various local pharmacies within the
geographical territory of England that are trained with an aim to administer vaccinations and
pharmacy patient records. Records are being kept on an individual basis now; it helps the
community pharmacy to keep a track record of their patients and they can use the information
whenever they need it.
3. Research methodology
The research was conducted in the NHS Kent Community pharmacies. The total number of 76
pharmacies was included for the conduction of this research (Coleman, 1999). The target
population should be the patients who are suffering from the coronary heart diseases, stroke
prone patients and the diabetic patients who have the high risks of death at any point of time. The
semi- structured telephonic interview method has been recognized in this research. The
supervisor has allocated six students for interviewing the pharmacists.
The pharmacists have given the interviews through telephones and the interviews have been
recorded with the use of the electronic media like the digital device which was played back and it
has been transcribed. The same technique has been used for taking the interviews with the staff
of the NHS. The interviewer has transcribed the recording and it has been checked by the
research colleague so that accuracy can be ensured.
The researcher has done two surveys for the conduction of the research. From the first survey it
has been observed that the researcher should collect the list of all the LPC chairs in England and
it has been obtained from LPC online websites (Norton, 2006). From there the email address, the
telephone number and the contact numbers has been taken which is useful or the research. The
detailed information about the LPC chairs from the 3 areas where the NHS health checks have
been introduced in three pharmacies has been taken. The questionnaire has been developed
where the survey from the different LPC chairs located in various areas and the raw data have
been taken from the questionnaire which has been developed (Carrier, 1998).
From the survey 2 the primary data has been collected like the interviews conducted with the
pharmacists who have the appointments in each NHS health checks which have been located in
various areas. The interviews are also conducted with the staffs of the pharmacies about what
type of patients generally comes for the checkups.
The other method for the collection of the data is the secondary data collection method which
includes the collection of the information from the online websites of NHS in England which
gives the details of the pharmacy providers in England so that the details of the pharmacy
providers have been taken. The details include the contact and name of the pharmacy providers.
From the website the researcher collects the name of the pharmacy providers who provides
medicines for the NHS health checks.
The questionnaires which have been designed should be distributed to three pharmacy providers
in the areas where the NHS health checkups are there in the areas. The open ended questions are
to be asked to the respondents which includes the multiple choice questions. The postal
questionnaires have been distributed to different pharmacy providers and to the pharmacist who
includes the free post envelopes and the questionnaire have been presented online. The LPC
chairs were sent the email reminders and the telephone reminders so that accurate information
can be gathered from the online questionnaire (Hall, 2011).
The researcher has to follow some of the ethical guidelines before the conduction of the research.
The researcher should ask the respondents before taking the interviews with the pharmacists and
the staffs of the NHS health checks. The researcher could not ask any personal questions to the
respondents so that the respondents feel uncomfortable in answering the questions. The
researcher should take the consent of the management authority of the NHS before asking any
questions to the pharmacy providers.
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N
Letter
Minimu
Maximu
Mean
Std.
3.72
.933
Deviation
automatically
100
3.55
.947
Smolking Cessation
100
2.26
.719
Weight Management
100
2.34
.714
Alcoholic Advice
100
2.28
.683
Exercise Prescription
100
2.36
.689
MUR
100
2.29
.715
100
3.31
1.354
T-Test
100
H0: There is no significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for support provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
H1: There is a significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for support provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
Pair 1
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Training 3.7900
100
.34185
.03419
Support 3.8020
100
.39028
.03903
Error
From the paired T-Test for the training and support given by the pharmacists of NHS for health
checkups it has been observed that there is no significant difference between the mean score of
the training required and the support level of the pharmacists.
Paired Samples Correlations
Training
Pair 1
Support
Correlation Sig.
100
.079
&
.435
Paired Differences
Mean
Training
Pair 1
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Upper
-.11084
.08684
-.01200
.49813
.04981
Support
Pair 1
Training - Support
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
0.241
99
.810
T-Test
H0: There is no significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for referral provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
H1: There is a significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for referral method provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
Training
Pair 1 Referral_metho
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
3.7900
100
.34185
.03419
3.7550
100
.38084
.03808
Error
From the paired T-Test for the training and support given by the pharmacists of NHS for health
checkups it has been observed that there is no significant difference between the mean score of
the training required and the referral method of the pharmacists.
Training
Pair 1
Referral_method
Correlation Sig.
100
-.085
&
.400
Paired Differences
Mean
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error 95%
Confidence
Interval
of
the
Difference
Lower
Training
Pair 1
.03500
.53298
.05330
-.07076
Referral_method
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
.657
99
.513
Differences
95%
Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Upper
Pair 1
T-Test
H0: There is no significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
H1: There is a significant difference between the feedback score for training and feedback score
for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
Pair 1
Training
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
3.7900
100
.34185
.03419
Promotion 3.7400
100
.33634
.03363
Error
From the paired T-Test for the training and support given by the pharmacists of NHS for health
checkups it has been observed that there is no significant difference between the mean score of
the training required and the promotion of the pharmacists.
Training
Correlation Sig.
100
.275
&
Pair 1
.006
Promotion
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error 95%
Confidence
Interval
of
the
Difference
Lower
Training
Pair 1
.05000
.40831
.04083
-.03102
Promotion
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Upper
Pair 1
Training - Promotion
.13102
1.225
99
.224
T-Test
H0: There is no significant difference between the feedback score for support level and feedback
score for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
H1: There is a significant difference between the feedback score for support level and feedback
score for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error
Pair 1
Support
3.8020
100
.39028
.03903
Promotion 3.7400
100
.33634
.03363
From the paired T-Test for the training and support given by the pharmacists of NHS for health
checkups it has been observed that there is no significant difference between the mean score of
the support level and the promotion of the pharmacists.
Support
Pair 1
Correlation Sig.
100
-.003
&
.980
Promotion
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error 95%
Confidence
Interval
the
Difference
Lower
of
Support
Pair 1
.06200
.51587
.05159
-.04036
Promotion
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
1.202
99
.232
Differences
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Upper
Pair 1
T-Test
Support - Promotion
.16436
Pair 1
Support
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
3.8020
100
.39028
.03903
Promotion 3.7400
100
.33634
.03363
Support
Pair 1
Correlation Sig.
100
-.003
&
Promotion
.980
Error
Mean
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error 95%
Confidence
Interval
of
the
Difference
Lower
Support
Pair 1
.06200
.51587
.05159
-.04036
Promotion
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
1.202
99
.232
Differences
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Upper
Pair 1
Support - Promotion
.16436
T-Test
H0: There is no significant difference between the feedback score for referral method and
feedback score for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
H1: There is a significant difference between the feedback score for referral method and
feedback score for promotion provided by NHS to the retail pharmacists.
100
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
.38084
.03808
Error
Promotion
3.7400
100
.33634
.03363
From the paired T-Test for the training and support given by the pharmacists of NHS for health
checkups it has been observed that there is no significant difference between the mean score of
the referral method and the promotion of the pharmacists.
Referral_method
Correlation Sig.
100
.025
&
Pair 1
.803
Promotion
Std.
Std.
Deviation
Mean
Error 95%
Confidence
Interval
the
Difference
Lower
Referral_method
Pair 1
.01500
Promotion
.50168
.05017
-.08454
of
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
.299
99
.766
Differences
95%
Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Upper
Referral_method
Pair 1
.11454
Promotion
Regression
Model Summary
Model R
.155a
a. Predictors:
R Square Adjusted
.024
R Std. Error of
Square
the Estimate
-.017
1.365
(Constant),
Promotion,
Support,
Referral_method, Training
From the regression table it has been observed that the
independent variables taken are the promotion, training,
referral methods and support while the dependent variable
is the patients. It has been observed that the regression
value is in the lower side which is 0.155 which indicates
that there is very low dependency on the independent
variables.
ANOVAa
Model
Sum
of df
Mean Square F
Sig.
.676b
Squares
Regression 4.345
1.086
Residual
177.045
95
1.864
Total
181.390
99
.583
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized
Standardized t
Coefficients
Coefficients
Std. Error
(Constant)
5.889
2.649
Training
.038
.421
Support
.059
Sig.
Beta
2.223
.029
.010
.090
.929
.354
.017
.167
.868
-.214
.363
-.060
-.589
.557
-.573
.425
-.142
-1.348
.181
Referral_metho
d
Promotion
Frequencies
Statistics
Valid
Smolking
Weight
Cessation
Management Advice
Prescription
100
100
100
100
100
Missing 0
Frequency Table
Alcoholic
Exercise
MUR
Smolking Cessation
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
16
16.0
16.0
16.0
42
42.0
42.0
58.0
your 42
42.0
42.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Health
receipients
for
Check
service
Total
100
Weight Management
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
14
14.0
14.0
14.0
38
38.0
38.0
52.0
your 48
48.0
48.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Health
receipients
for
Check
service
Total
100
Alcoholic Advice
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
13
13.0
13.0
13.0
46
46.0
46.0
59.0
your 41
41.0
41.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Health
receipients
for
Check
service
Total
100
Exercise Prescription
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
12
12.0
12.0
12.0
40.0
40.0
52.0
health Checks
Refer
Health
receipients
for
Check
your 48
48.0
48.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
service
Total
100
MUR
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
15
15.0
15.0
15.0
41
41.0
41.0
56.0
your 44
44.0
44.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Health
receipients
for
Check
service
Total
Oneway
100
ANOVA
Sum
of df
Mean Square F
Sig.
.414
.936
.400
.943
1.439
.177
Squares
Between
Support
.671
10
.067
Within Groups
14.409
89
.162
Total
15.080
99
.617
10
.062
Within Groups
13.741
89
.154
Total
14.359
99
1.559
10
.156
Within Groups
9.641
89
.108
Total
11.199
99
Groups
Between
Referral_metho Groups
d
Between
Promotion
Groups
It can be observed from the table that the ANOVA for training with respect to the support is
0.414 at the degrees of freedom (10, 99). Therefore it should be analyzed that there can
insignificant difference for training with respect to the support from the respondents.
It can be observed from the table that the ANOVA for training with respect to the referral method
is 0.400 at the degrees of freedom (10, 99). Therefore it should be analyzed that there can
insignificant difference for training with respect to the referral method from the respondents.
It can be observed from the table that the ANOVA for training with respect to the promotion is
1.439 at the degrees of freedom (10, 99). Therefore it should be analyzed that there can
significant difference for training with respect to the promotion from the respondents.
Oneway
ANOVA
Sum
of df
Mean Square F
Sig.
1.319
.238
1.014
.435
.550
.834
Squares
Between
Training
1.348
.150
Within Groups
10.221
90
.114
Total
11.570
99
1.322
.147
Within Groups
13.037
90
.145
Total
14.359
99
.584
.065
Within Groups
10.615
90
.118
Total
11.199
99
Groups
Between
Referral_metho Groups
d
Between
Promotion
Groups
It can be observed from the table that ANOVA for support with respect to the training is 1.319 at
the degrees of freedom at (9, 90). Therefore it has been analyzed that there is a significant
difference for support with respect to the training of the respondents.
It can be observed from the table that ANOVA for support with respect to the referral method is
1.014 at the degrees of freedom at (9, 90). Therefore it has been analyzed that there is a
significant difference for support with respect to the referral method of the respondents.
It can be observed from the table that ANOVA for support with respect to the promotion is 0.550
at the degrees of freedom at (9, 90). Therefore it has been analyzed that there is an insignificant
difference for support with respect to the promotion of the respondents.
4. Discussions
From the overall data analysis it is evident that National Health Services (NHS) health checkups
are an absolute necessity in prevention of some major harms and diseases among the population
in the nation of England, United Kingdom (UK). From the survey conducted among the
pharmacists as well as patients it has been seen that National Health Services (NHS) health
checkups have been successfully conducted across England, United Kingdom (UK) and the
patients have significantly benefited from the overall health services and facilities provided by
the various pharmacies across the nation. The overall survey has revealed that the pharmacies are
proficiently well equipped and are significantly supported by the National Health Services
(NHS) (Carrier, 1998). The pharmacies receive proper financial as well as equipment support
from the National Health Services (NHS) and are proficient enough to provide the people with
high quality health services and facilities such as coronary heart diseases, strokes, diabetes,
obesity and several other health issues and problems which are significantly related to alcohol
misuse and smoking. Thus from the above analysis it can be widely said that National Health
Services (NHS), provides efficient checkups for the people of England, United Kingdom (UK),
through various pharmacies located across the nation. The people or the respective patients were
found to respond positively to the overall survey. According to the patients, the initiation of
health checkups through the pharmacies by the National Health Services (NHS, is of a
significant importance in improving the overall health system in the nation of England, United
Kingdom (UK). The people have been extensively benefited from the health services and
facilities provided by the National Health Services (NHS) through incorporating various
pharmacies located across the nation.
However, it is needed for the pharmacies to provide efficient training and development of their
overall employees or staffs for providing the respective patients with high standardized quality of
products and services and addressing various health issues and problems that are been
significantly faced by the people. In addition the various pharmacies also need to generate the
awareness among the people especially among the younger generation regarding the ill effects of
alcohol misuse and smoking through effective and proficient promotional campaigns. Such
promotional campaigns are necessary for educating the people the right way of leading a healthy
lifestyle by avoiding the habits of smoking and drinking and indulging themselves in proper
exercise routines and well maintained diets.
5. Conclusion
The initiative of health checkups through various pharmacies that have been significantly
undertaken by the National Health Services (NHS, can be considered to a significant major
factor which can extensively improve or enhance the overall health system in the nation of
England, United Kingdom (UK). The conducted survey has revealed the success of the initiated
health checkups by the National Health Services (NHS), and it can be widely considered that
such initiatives must continue and improve in the near future for enhancing the overall health
system in the nation of England, United Kingdom (UK). It was seen from the conducted survey
that both the pharmacists as well as the respective patients are extensively satisfied with the
health check up initiatives of the National Health Services (NHS). This reflects the overall
success of the undertaken project (Bradley, 2000).
References
Bowerman, J. and Lamb-White, J. (2007). Leadership in health services. Bradford, UK: Emerald
Group.
Bradley, P. and Burls, A. (2000). Ethics in public and community health. London: Routledge.
Brown, R. (1973). The changing National Health Service. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carrier, J. and Kendall, I. (1998). Health and the National Health Service. London: Athlone
Press.
Chacko, G. (1979). Health handbook. Amsterdam [etc.]: North-Holland.
Coleman, M. (1999). Cancer survival trends in England and Wales, 1971-1995. London: The
Stationery Office.
Davis, H. and Martin, S. (2008). Public services inspection in the UK. London: Jessica Kingsley
Publishers.
Fabre, R. (1957). Pharmacy. [New York]: [Cultural Center of the French Embassy].
Feldstein, M. (1967). Economic analysis for health service efficiency. Amsterdam: NorthHolland Pub. Co.
Fraser, S. and Matthews, S. (2008). The critical practitioner in social work and health care.
Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
Gask, L. (2009). Primary care mental health. London: RCPsych Publications.
Generali, J. and Berger, C. (2006). Pharmacy. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Pub. Division.
Greenleaf, W. (1939). Pharmacy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Office of
Education.
Guth, E. (1945). Pharmacy. Boston, Mass.: Bellman Publishing Company, Inc.
Hall, G. and Reiss, B. (2011). Pharmacy. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.
Hill of Luton, C. and Woodcock, J. (1949). The National Health Service. London: Johnson.
Johnson, D. (1962). The British national health service. London: Johnson.
Levitt, R. and Wall, A. (1984). The reorganised National Health Service. London: Croom Helm.
Malek, M. and Joughin, C. (2004). Mental health services for minority ethnic children and
adolescents. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Merino, N. (2012). Health care. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.
Muteham, W. (1950). Pharmacy. London: Pitman.
Norton, K. (2006). Setting up new services in the NHS. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Taylor, J. and Themessl-Huber, M. (2009). Safeguarding children in primary health care.
London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
References
Agrizzi, D. (n.d.). Costing Information in the UK NHS: The (Non-) Use of Cost Information in
the UK NHS Trust Hospitals. SSRN Journal.
Artac, M., Dalton, A., Majeed, A., Car, J., Huckvale, K. and Millett, C. (2013). Uptake of the
NHS Health Check programme in an urban setting. Family Practice, 30(4), pp.426-435.
BMA council agrees structure for devolution Doctors welcome public health green paper NHS
needs occupational health service NHS complaints must be speeded up BMA annual report.
(1998). BMJ, 316(7144), pp.1615-1615.
BMA council agrees structure for devolution Doctors welcome public health green paper NHS
needs occupational health service NHS complaints must be speeded up BMA annual report.
(1998). BMJ, 316(7144), pp.1615-1615.
Chipchase, L., Waterall, J. and Hill, P. (2013). Understanding how the NHS Health Check works
in practice.Practice Nursing, 24(1), pp.24-29.
Day, M. (2006). UK government accused of privatising the NHS. BMJ, 333(7558), pp.61-61.
Dyer, C. (2001). UK considers new compensation plan for NHS. BMJ, 323(7304), pp.66-66.
Fox, B., Taylor, N., Yazdany, J. and Brewer, S. (2011). Arthritis For Dummies. Hoboken: John
Wiley & Sons.
Gammon, M. (1975). UK NHS hospital service. London (80 Highgate West Hill, N6 6LU): St
Michael's Organisation.
Gaynor, M., Laudicella, M. and Propper, C. (2011). Can governments do it better?. Cambridge,
Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Goddard, M. (1997). Contracting in the UK NHS. York: Centre for Health Economics,
University of York.
Greener, I. (2009). Healthcare in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.
Huang, G. (2013). Health information science. Berlin: Springer.
Kennedy, I. (2005). The new health check' for the NHS from 2006. Br J Healthcare
Management, 11(1), pp.9-12.
Mayor, S. (2000). UK helps refugee doctors to practise in NHS. BMJ, 321(7270), pp.1178-1178.
Mayor, S. (2008). Annual health check of NHS trusts in England shows room for
improvement. BMJ, 337(oct16 1), pp.a2121-a2121.
McCartney, M. (2014). NHS Health Check betrays the ethos of public health. BMJ, 349(jul22
13), pp.g4752-g4752.
McNaughton, R. and Shucksmith, J. (2014). Reasons for (non)compliance with intervention
following identification of 'high-risk' status in the NHS Health Check programme. Journal of
Public Health.
Newton, J., Davis, A., Waterall, J. and Fenton, K. (2014). NHS Health Check programme: too
early to conclude. BMJ, 349(jul30 5), pp.g4785-g4785.
NHS growth cuts planned in UK. (1993). Inpharma Weekly, &NA;(911), p.6.
NHS publishes online guide to its health check programme. (2014). Nursing Standard, 28(40),
pp.0-0.
Nixon, J. (2000). How does the UK NHS compare with European standards?. York: University
of York, Centre for Health Economics.
Perry, C., Thurston, M., Alford, S., Cushing, J. and Panter, L. (2014). The NHS health check
programme in England: a qualitative study. Health Promotion International.
Smith, S., Waterall, J. and Burden, A. (2013). An evaluation of the performance of the NHS
Health Check programme in identifying people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. BMJ
Open, 3(3), pp.e002219-e002219.
The leadership challenge - is the NHS 'up to it'?. (2012). Perspectives in Public Health, 132(6),
pp.271-273.
THOMPSON, W. (1989). Planning and setting up a home saftey check schemeBelfast. Health
Promotion International, 4(2), pp.143-144.
UK government to examine NHS prescribing. (1995). PharmacoResources, 21(1), pp.15-15.
What's happening to NHS spending across the UK?. (2011). BMJ, 342(jun20 1), pp.d3848d3848.
Wilkinson, I. (2010). Assessing vascular risks: the NHS Health Check programme. Journal of
Renal Nursing, 2(4), pp.178-181.