Optimal Placement of STATCOM in Power Systems
Optimal Placement of STATCOM in Power Systems
Optimal Placement of STATCOM in Power Systems
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research (IJETER), Vol. 3 No.1, Pages : 30 33 (2015)
Special Issue of ICEEMC 2015 - Held during January 27, 2015, Chennai, India
INTRODUCTION
The rapid growth in electrical energy use, combined with
the demand for low cost energy, has gradually led to the
development of generation sites remotely located from the
load center. The generation of bulk power at remote locations
necessitates the use of transmission lines to connect
generation sites to load centers. Furthermore, to enhance the
system reliability, multiple lines that connect load centers to
several sources, interlink neighboring utilities, and build the
needed levels of redundancy have gradually led to the
evolution of complex interconnected electrical transmission
networks [1], [2].
In a complex interconnected ac transmission network, the
source-to-load power flow finds multiple transmission paths.
The main problems with interconnected lines are at loaded
conditions the voltage drop increases resulting in a decrease
of transmittable power. This may lead to voltage collapse and
voltage instability. This situation has necessitated a need for
reactive power compensation to achieve a larger stability
margin, greater operating flexibility, and better utilization of
the existing power system [1], [2] and [11].
The conventional approaches for voltage regulation and
power compensation include shunt and series compensators.
These devices are mechanically controlled at low speed and
the system is not fully controlled and optimized from a
dynamic and steady-state point of view. This has led to the
need for flexible compensating devices to mitigate the above
problems. Flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) have
gained a great interest during the last few years, due to recent
MODELING OF STATCOM:
Accurate power flow calculation should consider the
steady state losses of STATCOM. The converter losses
include mainly three parts: the power losses in the dc
capacitor, the switching losses, and conduction losses. The
percentage of each loss component relates to the control
mode of STATCOM and the steady-state operating point [1].
The equivalent circuit of STATCOM is shown in Fig.2. In
this circuit, the inductance, xs represents the leakage
inductance of the transformer, the series resistance,
rsrepresents the sum of the switching and conduction losses,
and the shunt resistance, rp represents the power losses in the
dc capacitor. From Fig., it can be seen that the VSC acts as an
AC voltage source behind equivalent impedance, where both
magnitude and Phase angle of the source are controllable.
The voltage vector is given as
(9)
and
are calculated real and reactive powers
respectively at bus s.
and
are fixed for load
buses.
is fixed for generation buses. As the STATCOM
being connected to the ac system at bus s,
and
are
not fixed. Since real and reactive power exchange between
the ac system and STATCOM is varying. The active power
output at the ac side of VSC is given as,
)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(1)
=
(13)
)2
cos (
+ ) = 0(14)
(3)
(4)
)
(5)
where
(6)
(7)
(8)
(15)
2
i ]/
Voi2 (16)
(17)
WITHOUT
STATCOM
WITH STATCOM
Bus
No.
Voltage
Mag.
Angle
Degree
Bus
No.
Voltage
Mag.
Angle
Degree
0.965
-2.426
-0.074
(18)
(19)
The table 1 shows the IEEE 3 bus result with and without
STATCOM and it is clear that there is a voltage improvement
in the third bus of the system i.e., it reduces the system losses
and improves the power transfer capability of the system.
B. IEEE-30 Bus System:
(20)
The elements of the row matrix of equations (19) and (20) are
obtained as follows,
=
+2
(21)
(21)
=4
(22)
,
are
BUS NO.
3
0.4278
0.3308
0.2809
0.1066
0.0947
0.0751
0.2848
0.1906
1.3781
0.4232
CONCLUSION
10
0.8686
0.3561
12
1.0962
0.4185
14
2.237
0.282
15
1.8014
0.2438
16
0.8311
0.6041
17
1.5399
0.3918
18
2.6883
0.2905
19
2.3239
0.4035
20
2.5535
0.3182
REFERENCES
21
1.8943
0.2735
[1]
22
1.8969
0.2706
23
2.8467
0.2086
24
2.3706
0.2112
25
3.1079
0.4857
26
6.5732
0.2039
27
1.1103
1.0978
28
0.1635
0.256
29
4.2099
1.1713
30
0.0309
3.0215
The top most bus in both the factor are given more priority.
Therefore bus 26 and 30 are chosen for accommodating the
STATCOM.
The base case power flow results reveal that around 42%
of generated power is lost while transmitting. More power
can be usefully transmitted if this loss percentage is reduced.
STATCOM is made to operate to achieve a target voltage.
This action of the device can be turned ON or OFF using
VSTATCOM option; this indicates the control status over the bus
voltage magnitude .Converters reactance is 10p.u.
STATCOM is placed at buses 26,30 and load flow was
carried out. The table 3 shows the results for normal and
improved voltage of an IEEE 30 bus which is clearly
indicates that there is a voltage profile improvement.
Table.3:Normal and Improved Voltage ofan IEEE 30 Bus System
NORMAL VOLTAGE
IMPROVED VOLTAGE
Bus
No.
Voltage
Mag.
Angle
Degree
Bus
No.
Voltage
Mag.
Angle
Degree
26
1.001
-16.842
26
1.0014
-16.7872
30
0.995
-18.015
30
1.002
-18.0321
33