MGMA Data Sheet No 3

RAINWATER
DRAINAGE DESIGN
BS EN12056:3-2000
REVISED VERSION
MGMA Information Sheet No 03
July 2012
The approved method for calculating the sizing of

guttering and downpipes is BS EN12056:3-2000, which
replaced BS6367 in 2000. It is a pan-European standard
however, as a considerable amount of the UK design
detail is actually in the National Annexes at the rear of the
Standard, the document must be navigated with care.
The primary considerations when specifying rainwater
goods are rainfall intensity, catchment area, gutter capacity
and outlet/downpipe capacity.
RAINFALL INTENSITY
Rainfall intensity was previously measured in millimetres
per hour in the United Kingdom but was brought into line
with mainland Europe in 2000 and is now measured in
litres per second per square metre. For example, a value
of 150mm/hour is replaced by 0.042 l/(s.m2).
Rainfall is presented on meteorological maps which show
the intensity of rainfall likely to fall in a two minute storm for
a given return period. This is a very short duration event,
and will typically occur in early and late summer, usually
on a warm day. The highest level of rainfall is in areas
usually associated with dry weather; and so east Anglia
and the south east of England have a design rainfall level
over twice that of some parts of Scotland. For example,
the normal criteria for external eaves gutters is a one year
event which would vary from 0.022 l/(s.m2) in London to
0.01 l/(s.m2) in Fort William.
EAVES GUTTERS
Eaves gutters are relatively simple as they can be allowed
to overflow in extreme circumstances; however gutters
that discharge inside are a much greater risk, and are
treated differently. There are a number of factors to be
taken into account before proceeding with gutter sizing:

Position
Is the gutter fully external or could it overflow
somewhere where it could damage the building
or cause nuisance?
Building life
If the gutter is not external, and a building life is
not specified, assume 60 years for a standard
building and longer for important public buildings.
Building use
Internal gutters, which will include some eaves
gutters with enclosed fascia soffit details must be
factored upwards which means a given life of 60
years will be multiplied as follows:
Category 2: normal building use
1.5 60 = 90 years
Category 3: sensitive building use (for example,
hospitals, computer rooms)
4.5 60 = 270 years
Consult the meteorological map that best reflects the

figure obtained, look at the site location and you will get
the rainfall intensity for the project.
Damage caused by inadequate roof drainage

All the data for rainfall design in the UK is in the National
Annex NB starting on page 51
CATCHMENT AREA
Catchment area is often misinterpreted in roof drainage
calculations. Rainfall does not always fall vertically and to
account for this, the British Standard assumes the angle to
be two units vertical to one unit horizontal (ie 65 degrees).
To allow for this, the designer must take half the vertical
area of the roof into account to give an Effective Roof
Area.
Furthermore, an often neglected factor is run off from
vertical surfaces, for example where a small lean-to type
office building abuts a factory there will be significant run
off from vertical surfaces. The factor for vertical surfaces
is 50 percent of the area and this must be added to the
effective roof area before proceeding.
Again, details of catchment area calculation are in the
National Annex, NC, starting on page 63.
GUTTER CAPACITY
BS EN12056-3:2000 allows for two types of flow in gutters:

Free flow
Restricted flow
In free flow, the capacity of the outlet is greater than that of

the gutters and therefore the gutter runs freely. However,
most industrial gutters are sized for pedestrian access,
and so are hydraulically bigger than they need to be. They
would therefore need large outlets to make them run
free. By using smaller outlets, water fills the gutter more
uniformly and thus although outlet flow improves, gutter
flow is restricted. Provided the restricted gutter capacity is
larger than the flow coming into the gutter, this solution is
acceptable and can often offer substantial material savings.
Whichever flow mode is employed, when the gutter length
from a stop end to an outlet exceeds 50 times its depth,
or the distance between outlets exceeds 100 times the

depth, friction will become a consideration and will have to
be included in calculations. Corners in the gutter will also
have an effect of flow, and must be taken into account in
the calculations, however close they are to the outlet.
Software and expertise is available to assist with these
calculations; please contact individual MGMA members
for advice.
OUTLET/DOWNPIPE CAPACITY
The outlet from the gutter will usually have a far lower
capacity than that of the rainwater pipe it connects into.
This is because water is unable to effectively turn sharp
corners and so at the outlet, water tends to smooth out
the turn and form a narrow neck of flow. Once into the
downpipe, this will to spread out to the inside surface of the
pipe and, pulled by gravity, the water will accelerates away.
If the outlet has rounded shoulders or tapers from a
larger diameter, this can improve capacity considerably.
Hoppers and sumps can be introduced to create a greater
depth of water to improve the performance of a system
where the designer is restricted in choice.
There are some situations to be avoided or at least to be
aware of:

Back or side outlets perform badly and are not

recommended by the Standard. There are
fabrication methods that can create a more
efficient back outlet if it really cannot be avoided.
There is a 50 percent reduction in outlet capacity
where a leaf guard is fitted. This is to take into
account the fact that most leaf guards quickly
attract a waterproof covering of leaves.
If the percentage of water in downpipes becomes
too great, there is a risk that siphonic action will
occur. In the right place, siphonic action can be
very useful; allowing huge volumes of water to be
moved by relatively small pipes. However, in areas
where siphonic action is not expected it can cause
a number of problems, for example excessive
vibration and pipe wear, noise and pipe implosions.
To avoid these risks filling limits in pipes have been set as

shown in the table below
Even good designs will fail if not maintained
Pipe diameter (mm)
Maximum flow (l/s)
50
1.7
63
3.1
75
5.0
100
10.7
150
31.6
200
68.0
Correct design to BSEN12056-3:2000, in conjunction

with adequate maintenance will ensure the roof drainage
system does not cause any problems during the life of
the building. MGMA members can advise on design to
BS EN12056-3:2000; some offer a free design service for
their products.
Visit our web site

At www.mgma.co.uk you can contact MGMA members and discover the products and services available. Members are only
too pleased to help with any problems you have and can provide design assistance should you need it.
Whilst the information in this data sheet is believed to be correct at the time of going to press, the Metal Gutter Manufacturers Association and its member
companies cannot be held responsible for any errors or inaccuracies and, in particular, the specification for any application must be checked with the individual
manufacturer concerned for a given installation.
Metal Gutter Manufacturers Association

106 Ruskin Avenue
Rogerstone Newport
South Wales
NP10 0BD
01633 891584
mgmagutters@gmail.com
www.mgma.co.uk

MGMA Data Sheet No 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MGMA Data Sheet No 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MGMA Data Sheet No 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RAINWATER

The approved method for calculating the sizing of

Consult the meteorological map that best reflects the

Damage caused by inadequate roof drainage

In free flow, the capacity of the outlet is greater than that of

or the distance between outlets exceeds 100 times the

Back or side outlets perform badly and are not

To avoid these risks filling limits in pipes have been set as

Even good designs will fail if not maintained

Pipe diameter (mm)

Maximum flow (l/s)

Correct design to BSEN12056-3:2000, in conjunction

Visit our web site

Metal Gutter Manufacturers Association

You might also like