Improving Adaptation To Weaning: Effect of Intermittent Suckling Regimens On Piglet Feed Intake, Growth, and Gut Characteristics
Improving Adaptation To Weaning: Effect of Intermittent Suckling Regimens On Piglet Feed Intake, Growth, and Gut Characteristics
Improving Adaptation To Weaning: Effect of Intermittent Suckling Regimens On Piglet Feed Intake, Growth, and Gut Characteristics
3156
2
sows [TOPIGS20 (Landrace York), TOPIGS, Helvoirt, the Netherlands] and their litters with an average
parity of 3.5 0.1 (ranging from 1 to 9) were used.
The numbers of sows used in replicates 1 to 4 were 29,
33, 29 and 33, respectively. Piglets were TOPIGS20
TEMPO crossbreds (TOPIGS). One week before farrowing, pregnant sows were individually housed in a
farrowing pen (2.4 1.8 m) with farrowing crate. An
infrared heated area was provided for the piglets from
birth until d 14. Artificial lighting was provided between 0600 and 1800 h and was dimmed during the
night. At weaning, each litter was moved from their
farrowing pen to its own nursery pen (1.77 2.65 m).
Litters remained in the nursery pen until the end of the
experiment (d 61).
Litter size was standardized within 2 d after farrowing by cross fostering, resulting in an average litter size
of 12.4 0.1 piglets. One day after farrowing, piglets
were weighed and received an eartag for individual identification. Within 1 wk after farrowing, piglets received
a 1-mL (200 mg) intramuscular iron injection (Prevan
200, Eurovet Animal Health, Bladel, the Netherlands).
Within each replicate, the beginning of the experimental procedure (d 0) was designated as the day at which
most of the litters were born. Litters were born from 3
d before to 3 d after d 0, and piglet age at d 0 was 0.4
0.2 on average.
All litters were offered ad libitum access to creep feed
from d 7 onward. From d 7 to 12, a 1:1 mix of 2 commercial creep feed diets was offered in a feeding bowl
(diet 1, 19% CP, 1.1% lysine, Babito, Havens Voeders, Maashees, the Netherlands; diet 2, 16.1% CP, 1.2%
lysine, Almido Big, Havens Graanhandel NV). From d
12 until d 40, diet 2 was offered in a piglet feeder with
2 feeding places (15 cm/feeding place). From d 42 until
the end of the experiment (d 61), a commercial creep
feed for weaner pigs (diet 3; 17.1% CP, 1.15% lysine;
Havo Opfok Sprint, Havens Voeders) was offered. During a 2-d transition period (d 40 to 42), diets 2 and 3
were mixed (1:1) for a gradual transition. During the
entire experiment, drinking water was continuously
available, provided by 1 drinking nipple per pen. Sows
were fed an increasing amount of feed (Euro
Airline Lactokorrel, 15% CP, 5.1% lysine, Cehave
Landbouw- belang Voeders, Veghel, the Netherlands)
after farrow- ing until the maximum allowance of 7.5
kg was reached at d 13 of lactation.
Adaptation to weaning
by et
intermittent
suckling
Berkeveld
al.
INTRODUCTION
Conventional weaning of piglets is associated with a
reduced postweaning nutrient intake, reduced growth,
and a greater susceptibility to diarrhea. Intermittent
suckling (IS), a management strategy in which sow
and piglets are separated during a fixed period of the
day, stimulates preweaning creep feed intake and, as a
result, improves postweaning feed intake and growth
(IS from d 14, weaned at d 25; Kuller et al., 2004).
Moreover, combining IS with an extended lactation
period improved adaptation to weaning, as judged by
the markedly reduced postweaning growth check and
greater feed intake after weaning (Berkeveld et al.,
2007b). Average feed intake during the first week of IS
is less when 14-d-old piglets are subjected to IS, but
is markedly increased when piglets are 1 wk older at
initiation of IS (Berkeveld, 2008). One may question
whether postponing the onset of IS to an older age,
together with the associated greater feed intake, facilitates the adaptation to weaning. However, in the latter
study, initiation of IS at a later age coincided with a
later weaning age as well, making it hard to evaluate
the relative contribution of weaning age and age at the
start of IS. Moreover, no comparison was made to a
conventional weaning (CW) regimen.
A 2-wk period of IS before weaning reduced the weaning-associated villus atrophy and increased postweaning
small intestinal (SI) absorption, if creep feed was provided (Nabuurs et al., 1996); no data on piglet feed intake or piglet growth were presented. Recent IS studies
focused on the effects of IS on piglet growth and feed
intake (Kuller et al., 2007; Millet et al., 2008). Hence,
the effect of IS regimens on postweaning SI variables,
and the relation of these variables with feed intake and
growth, remain to be elucidated.
The aim of the current study was to determine how
age at weaning in piglets that have been subjected to
IS, and the duration of the preceding IS period, each
contribute to postweaning adaptation through effects
on feed intake, growth, and gut characteristics. Besides
macroscopic and morphologic variables of the small
intestine, plasma citrulline concentration, a possible
marker for SI function (Berkeveld et al., 2008), and its
relation to SI morphology were determined.
Treatment
s
Within each replicate, sows were allocated to treatments based on sow parity and BW 1 wk before farrowing. The sow and her litter were subjected to CW or to
1 of 3 IS regimens (Figure 1). Litters receiving different
treatments were housed in separate similar farrowing
rooms to prevent possible disturbing effects of nursing
litters in the same room, whereas other litters were separated from their sow during IS. In CW litters (n =
29), piglets had continuous access to the sow until
weaning
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the interventions within each treatment. CF = start of creep feed (d 7); IS = onset of intermittent
suck- ling; W = weaning. Shaded bars indicate period of IS. CW = conventional weaning at d 26; IS197D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 26;
IS1914D
= IS from d 19, weaning at d 33; IS267D = IS from d 26, weaning at d 33.
Collection of Samples
A total of 10 litters per treatment of the first 2 replicates were selected on d 25 based on litter feed intake
(closest to treatment average). Within each of these litters, 3 piglets were selected based on their BW (closest
to litter average), resulting in a total of 30 piglets per
treatment (n = 120 piglets in total). The 3 piglets per
litter were killed at weaning, or at d 2 and 8 postweaning, respectively, by intracardial injection of Euthesate
(0.75 to 1 mL/kg of BW; Ceva Sant Animale, Naaldwijk, the Netherlands) after a 5-mL cardiac blood sample was obtained. The blood sample was transferred
to a heparin-coated tube, and after centrifugation (10
min, 2,000 g at 4C), plasma samples were stored
at 80C. The abdominal cavity was opened, and gut
segments (3 cm) for microscopy were obtained at ~10,
~50, and ~90% of the SI length (duodenal, jejunal,
and ileal sections). The gut segments were opened
lengthwise and pinned on a piece of dental wax with
Histological
Procedure
Two transverse tissue samples were cut from each
segment using a stereo microscope. These parts of the
tissue sample were dehydrated, embedded together in
paraffin wax, and sectioned at 4 (or 5) m. One section
was transferred to a slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Hence, each slide contained 2 transverse
tissue samples of a gut segment. In each slide, villus
height and crypt depth were determined for at least 10
villi and crypts (17.4 0.2 observations per slide on
average) using an image analysis system with a monitor
(Image Tool version 3.0, UTHSCSA Dental Diagnostic
Science, San Antonio, TX). Villi and crypts were only
measured when there was a complete longitudinal section of a villus and an associated crypt. The average
villus height and crypt depth per slide was used as experimental observation.
Plasma
Concentration
Citrulline
Plasma citrulline concentrations obtained before euthanization of the piglets were analyzed by automated ion-exchange chromatography performed on a Jeol
Amino-Tac (JLC-500/V, Tokyo, Japan) with postcolumn ninhydrin derivatization (Berkeveld et al., 2008).
Calculations
Cumulative feed intake at each weighing was calculated by summing the total feed intake at all previous times of weighing. A relative growth check was
defined as the reduction in ADG in the first 2 d after
weaning, from d 26 to 28 for IS197D and CW litters,
and from d 33 to 35 for IS1914D and IS267D litters, compared with the ADG in the last 5 d before
weaning, and expressed as a percentage. The relative
growth check (%) was calculated as 100(ADGd 2126
ADGd 2628)/ADGd 2126 for litters weaned at d 26 and
as 100(ADGd 2833 ADGd 3335)/ADGd 2833 for litters
weaned at d 33.
Statistical
Analysis
Data are presented as means SE. Normally distributed data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure
(SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Litters were individually
housed in a separate farrowing pen and, hence, considered as the experimental unit. In each replicate, the 7
to 9 pens (= litters) of 1 treatment were located in
1 of the 4 very similar farrowing rooms. The
experiment was conducted during 4 replicates, and
each
replicate contained all
4 treatments. As
mentioned previously, the different farrowing room
per
treatment was
used to prevent
possible
disturbing effects of nursing litters in the room,
whereas other litters were separated from their sows.
The applied experimental design did not include a
treatment group with an extended lactation (weaning
at d 33) without IS. This means that only pair-wise
comparisons were made between litters weaned at d
26 (CW vs. IS197D) or those at d 33 (IS1914D vs.
IS267D), or between litters with 1 wk of IS weaned at
d 26 or 33 (IS197D vs. IS267D). Moreover, we want
to emphasize that possible treatment effects in litters
weaned at d 33 cannot be entirely contributed to age at
weaning or IS alone.
Although litter was the experimental unit for ADFI,
ADG, and BW, and used as such in statistical analyses, all data were expressed per piglet. Effects were
considered significant when P < 0.05; in posthoc testing the Bonferroni correction was applied. Correlations
were
calculated using
Pearson
correlation
coefficients of SAS.
Because feed intake data of the first 3 wk (until d
21) were not normally distributed, they were analyzed
using PROC NPAR1WAY, a nonparametric KruskalWallis test. If this test detected an overall treatment
effect, data of treatments were tested pairwise. Feed
intake data (from d 26 onward), BW, and ADG were
analyzed as litter characteristics with treatment as
fixed factor, replicate and sow as random factors, and
age at d 0, BW at d 19, litter size (only for feed intake)
RESULTS
Feed
Intake
Creep feed intake before d 19 was negligible for all
treatments. Between d 19 and 26, IS197D and IS19
14D litters were subjected to IS, whereas CW and
IS267D litters were still continuously suckled. Feed in-
Table 1. Feed intake of piglets per treatment during lactation and after weaning (W)
Treatment
Day1
Item
3
ADFI, gpiglet d
19 to 21
21 to 26
26 to 28
28 to 33
33 to 35
35 to 404
40 to 61
12 to W, g/piglet
12 to 61, kg/piglet
CUMFI5
CW
IS197D
IS1914D
IS267D
72
14 3
a
103 7*
a
164 9
362 13a
ab
808 21
103 2a
a
20.6 0.5
51
19 3
a
112 9*
b
203 9
375 15a
b
829 21
126 2ab
a
21.4 0.6
51
20 4
b
37 5
75 10c
a
244 17*
325 12b
ac
775 19
587 8c
b
18.7 0.5
7 1
20 3
b
34 6
55 6c
b
201 14*
322 16b
c
752 24
484 6bc
b
18.7 0.6
ac
Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).
Day = day of the experiment; d 0 = day on which most of the litters were born, litters were born from 3 d before to 3 d after d 0.
2
CW = conventional weaning at d 26 (n = 29); IS = intermittent suckling; IS197D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 26 (n = 33); IS1914D =
IS
from d 19, weaning at d 33 (n = 28); IS267D = IS from d 26, weaning at d 33 (n = 33).
3
ADFI (g/d) per piglet in the indicated period.
4
Because feed residuals were not determined in the CW and IS197D litters on d 35, the ADFI was calculated between d 33 and 40.
5
CUMFI = average cumulative feed intake (g or kg) per piglet in the indicated period.
1
Piglet
Performance
Piglet mortality up to d 19, before onset of treatments, was 9%. Piglet loss from d 19 until the end of
the experiment (d 61) was similar in all treatments (3.4
0.2% on average).
Piglet BW at the start of treatments (d 19) was
slightly greater in IS267D litters compared with IS19
7D litters (P = 0.026); CW and IS1914D litters were
intermediate (Table 2). Therefore, treatment effects on
BW and ADG were always corrected for BW at d 19
(see Statistical Analysis section). Intermittent suck-
Table 2. Body weight of piglets (kg) during lactation and after weaning
Treatment2
Day
0
19
21
26
28
33
35
40
61
CW
1.41
6.22
6.80
8.16
8.15
8.68
0.04
ab
0.14
0.15a
a
0.19
0.18*a
a
0.19
10.54 0.25a
21.28 0.47
ac
IS197D
1.41
6.00
6.44
7.50
7.54
8.33
0.03
a
0.14
0.14b
b
0.16
0.16*b
a
0.19
10.23 0.25a
21.48 0.53
IS1914D
1.38
6.16
6.58
7.68
8.21
9.50
9.86
11.03
21.52
0.04
ab
0.17
0.18b
b
0.20
0.21a
b
0.24
0.26*
0.27b
0.47
IS267D
1.42
6.35
6.80
8.12
8.66
9.84
10.06
11.30
21.72
0.04
b
0.13
0.14a
a
0.15
0.16c
b
0.19
0.21*
0.24b
0.47
Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).
Day = day of the experiment; d 0 = day on which most of the litters were born, litters were born from 3 d
before to 3 d after d 0.
2
CW = conventional weaning at d 26 (n = 29); IS = intermittent suckling; IS197D = IS from d 19,
wean- ing at d 26 (n = 33); IS1914D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 33 (n = 28); IS267D = IS from d 26,
weaning at d 33 (n = 33).
*Indicates the first weighing after weaning.
1
Figure 2. Average daily gain of piglets (gpiglet1d1) during lactation and after weaning at d 26 (left graph) or at d 33 (right graph). acData
on piglet growth is presented in 2 graphs according to weaning age (d 26 or 33). However, the model used for statistical analysis of piglet growth
included all 4 treatments. Thus, at each experimental day, differences between the 4 treatments (P < 0.05) are indicated with different
letters. For instance, growth in weaned litters (CW and IS197D) between d 26 and 28 is less compared with that of unweaned litters (IS19
14D and IS267D). CW = conventional weaning at d 26 (; n = 29; left graph); IS = intermittent suckling; IS197D = IS from d 19, weaning
at d 26 (;
n = 33; left graph); IS1914D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 33 (; n = 28; right graph); IS267D = IS from d 26, weaning at d 33 (; n = 33;
right graph).
P-value
2
SI length, cm
Treatment
CW
656 25
596 27
631 24
IS197D
720 41
653 39
696 40
IS1914D
666 34
649 48
800 30
IS267D
696 42
689 34
771 41
SI full weight, g
Treatment (P < 0.001)
CW
283 16a
291 18a
549 19b
a
a
b
Day (P < 0.001)
IS197D
316 24
309 21
568 50
Treatment Day (P < 0.001)
IS1914D
394 24a
486 38a
814 30b
a
a
b
IS267D
377 21
477 33
863 32
3
ab
a,x
SI empty weight, g
Treatment (P < 0.001)
CW
276 17
225 13
368 19b,x
ab
a,xy
b,x
Day (P < 0.001)
IS197D
262 29
226 25
307 32
a
a,xy
Treatment Day (P < 0.01)
IS1914D
317 35
348 41
514 34b,y
a
a,y
b,y
IS267D
321 28
356 39
593 33
2
LI full weight, g
Treatment (P < 0.001)
CW
158 10
230 23
387 18
Day (P < 0.001)
IS197D
159 13
211 15
380 31
Treatment Day (P = 0.65)
IS1914D
266 23
347 34
514 25
IS267D
280 29
353 34
576 28
2
LI empty weight, g
Treatment (P < 0.001)
CW
89 6
96 7
165 8
Day (P < 0.001)
IS197D
89 8
94 6
159 11
Treatment Day (P = 0.41)
IS1914D
129 6
155 11
212 7
IS267D
132 9
152 9
228 8
a,b
Within a row, means within each treatment with a different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
x,y
Within a column, means within each day with a different superscript letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
1
CW = conventional weaning at d 26; IS = intermittent suckling; IS197D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 26; IS1914D = IS from d 19,
weaning at d 33; IS267D = IS from d 26, weaning at d 33.
2
Interaction between treatment and day was not significant for this variable; therefore, only overall P-values are given. SI = small intestinal; SI
length at d 8 > SI length at d 2 (overall P < 0.001). SI length of IS litters (irrespective of regimen) > SI length of CW litters (overall P <
0.02), no differences in SI length between IS regimens. Large intestine (LI) empty and full weight increase over time with d 0 < d 2 < d 8
(overall P <
0.001). The LI empty and full weight of IS1914D and IS267D litters > IS197D and CW litters (overall P < 0.001).
3
The means SE displayed for the SI empty weight were based on observations of replicate 2 (see paragraph Collection of Samples in Materials
Postweaning
Citrulline
Concentratio
n
Plasma
DISCUSSION
The aim of the current study was to determine how
age at weaning, after a period of IS, and the duration of
IS, each contribute to the prevention of the detrimental
effects on piglet performance and on gut characteristics associated with CW. In contrast to expectations,
results of the current study demonstrate that the
wean-
Figure 3. Villus height (m; upper graph) and crypt depth (m;
lower graph) in the small intestine at weaning and at 2 and 8 d
postweaning. Values are means SE, n = 10 piglets/treatment. The
measurements on villus height and crypt depth of the 3 sampling locations in the small intestine were averaged per piglet. a,bWithin each
treatment, differences between the values per day are indicated with
different letters above the bars (P < 0.05). *Different from the
value of CW treatment at that specific day (P < 0.05); **different
from the values in the CW and IS197D treatment at that specific
day (P < 0.05); ***different from the values in all other
treatments at that specific day (P < 0.05). CW = conventional
weaning at d 26; IS
= intermittent suckling; IS197D = IS from d 19, weaning at d
26; IS1914D = IS from d 19, weaning at d 33; IS267D = IS from d
26, weaning at d 33.
LITERATURE CITED
Berkeveld, M. 2008. Intermittent suckling and extended lactation:
Improving adaptation of piglets to postweaning challenges.
PhD Diss. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University,
Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Berkeveld, M., P. Langendijk, J. E. Bolhuis, A. P. Koets, J. H. M.
Verheijden,
and M. A. M. Taverne. 2007a. Intermittent
suckling during an extended lactation: Effects on piglet
behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 85:34153424.