How Nanotechnology Works
How Nanotechnology Works
How Nanotechnology Works
As small as a nanometer is, it's still large compared to the atomic scale. An atom has a
diameter of about 0.1 nm. An atom's nucleus is much smaller -- about 0.00001 nm.
Atoms are the building blocks for all matter in our universe. You and everything
around you are made of atoms. Nature has perfected the science of manufacturing
matter molecularly. For instance, our bodies are assembled in a specific manner from
millions of living cells. Cells are nature's nanomachines. At the atomic scale, elements
are at their most basic level. On the nanoscale, we can potentially put these atoms
together to make almost anything.
In a lecture called "Small Wonders:The World of Nanoscience," Nobel Prize winner
Dr. Horst Strmer said that the nanoscale is more interesting than the atomic scale
because the nanoscale is the first point where we can assemble something -- it's not
until we start putting atoms together that we can make anything useful.
In this article, we'll learn about what nanotechnology means today and what the future
of nanotechnology may hold. We'll also look at the potential risks that come with
working at the nanoscale.
In the next section, we'll learn more about our world on the nanoscale.
Dr. Strmer hopes that the different disciplines develop a common language and
communicate with one another [source: Strmer]. Only then, he says, can we
effectively teach nanoscience since you can't understand the world of nanotechnology
without a solid background in multiple sciences.
One of the exciting and challenging aspects of the nanoscale is the role that quantum
mechanics plays in it. The rules of quantum mechanics are very different from
classical physics, which means that the behavior of substances at the nanoscale can
sometimes contradict common sense by behaving erratically. You can't walk up to a
wall and immediately teleport to the other side of it, but at the nanoscale an electron
can -- it's called electron tunneling. Substances that are insulators, meaning they
can't carry an electric charge, in bulk form might become semiconductors when
reduced to the nanoscale. Melting points can change due to an increase in surface
area. Much of nanoscience requires that you forget what you know and start learning
all over again.
So what does this all mean? Right now, it means that scientists are experimenting with
substances at the nanoscale to learn about their properties and how we might be able
to take advantage of them in various applications. Engineers are trying to use nanosize wires to create smaller, more powerful microprocessors. Doctors are searching
for ways to use nanoparticles in medical applications. Still, we've got a long way to go
before nanotechnology dominates the technology and medical markets.
In the next section, we'll look at two important nanotechnology structures: nanowires
and carbon nanotubes.
Products with
Nanotechnology
You might be surprised to find out how many products on the
market are already benefiting from nanotechnology.
whitish color. Smaller particles are less visible, meaning that when you rub the sunscreen into your skin,
it doesn't give you a whitish tinge.
Bridgestone engineers
developed this Quick Response
Liquid Powder Display, a
flexible digital screen, using
nanotechnology.
Tennis, Anyone?
Nanotechnology is making a big impact on the tennis world. In
2002, the tennis racket company Babolat introduced the VS
Nanotube Power racket. They made the racket out of carbon
nanotube-infused graphite, meaning the racket was very light, yet
many times stronger than steel. Meanwhile, tennis ball
manufacturer Wilson introduced the Double Core tennis ball.
These balls have a coating of clay nanoparticles on the inner core.
The clay acts as a sealant, making it very difficult for air to escape
the ball.
Atoms and molecules stick together because they have complementary shapes that lock together, or
charges that attract. Just like with magnets, a positively charged atom will stick to a negatively charged
atom. As millions of these atoms are pieced together by nanomachines, a specific product will begin to
take shape. The goal of molecular manufacturing is to manipulate atoms individually and place them in
a pattern to produce a desired structure.
The first step would be to develop nanoscopic machines, called assemblers, that scientists can
program to manipulate atoms and molecules at will. Rice University Professor Richard Smalley points
out that it would take a single nanoscopic machine millions of years to assemble a meaningful amount
of material. In order for molecular manufacturing to be practical, you would need trillions of assemblers
working together simultaneously. Eric Drexler believes that assemblers could first replicate themselves,
building other assemblers. Each generation would build another, resulting in exponential growth until
there are enough assemblers to produce objects [source: Ray Kurzweil].
Because elements at the nanoscale behave differently than they do in their bulk form, there's a concern
that some nanoparticles could be toxic. Some doctors worry that the nanoparticles are so small, that
they could easily cross the blood-brain barrier, a membrane that protects the brain from harmful
chemicals in the bloodstream. If we plan on using nanoparticles to coat everything from our clothing to
our highways, we need to be sure that they won't poison us.
Closely related to the knowledge barrier is the technical barrier. In order for the incredible predictions
regarding nanotechnology to come true, we have to find ways to mass produce nano-size products like
transistors and nanowires. While we can use nanoparticles to build things like tennis rackets and make
wrinkle-free fabrics, we can't make really complex microprocessor chips with nanowires yet.
Apocalyptic Goo
Eric Drexler, the man who introduced the word nanotechnology,
presented a frightening apocalyptic vision -- self-replicating
nanorobots malfunctioning, duplicating themselves a trillion times
over, rapidly consuming the entire world as they pull carbon from
the environment to build more of themselves. It's called the "grey
goo" scenario, where a synthetic nano-size device replaces all
organic material. Another scenario involves nanodevices made of
organic material wiping out the Earth -- the "green goo" scenario.
There are some hefty social concerns about nanotechnology too. Nanotechnology may also allow us to
create more powerful weapons, both lethal and non-lethal. Some organizations are concerned that we'll
only get around to examining the ethical implications of nanotechnology in weaponry after these devices
are built. They urge scientists and politicians to examine carefully all the possibilities of nanotechnology
before designing increasingly powerful weapons.
If nanotechnology in medicine makes it possible for us to enhance ourselves physically, is that ethical?
In theory, medical nanotechnology could make us smarter, stronger and give us other abilities ranging
from rapid healing to night vision. Should we pursue such goals? Could we continue to call ourselves
human, or would we become transhuman -- the next step on man's evolutionary path? Since almost
every technology starts off as very expensive, would this mean we'd create two races of people -- a
wealthy race of modified humans and a poorer population of unaltered people? We don't have answers
to these questions, but several organizations are urging nanoscientists to consider these implications
now, before it becomes too late.
Not all questions involve altering the human body -- some deal with the world of finance and economics.
If molecular manufacturing becomes a reality, how will that impact the world's economy? Assuming we
can build anything we need with the click of a button, what happens to all the manufacturing jobs? If you
can create anything using a replicator, what happens to currency? Would we move to a completely
electronic economy? Would we even need money?
Whether we'll actually need to answer all of these questions is a matter of debate. Many experts think
that concerns like grey goo and transhumans are at best premature, and probably unnecessary. Even
so, nanotechnology will definitely continue to impact us as we learn more about the enormous potential
of the nanoscale.