Mmiers 1

Formation of the Final Report
The Final Report is comprised of the following volumes:

Volume 1: Executive Summary
Volume 2: Main Report 1
Volume 5: Supporting Report
Volume 6: Data Book
Volume 1, Executive Summary, contains the background information of this MMEIRS study, brief
information of earthquake damage scenario for Metropolitan Manila, and summary of the master plan for a
safer Metropolitan Manila for earthquake impact.
Volume 2, Main Report 1, contains the information of overall study and its results; that is the background
information of this study, earthquake damage scenario, and master plan and action plans for safer
Metropolitan Manila.
Volume 3, Main Report 2, defines problem of the present condition of Metropolitan Manila, and represents
damage estimation results together with its assumptions and methodologies.
Volume 4, Main Report 3, contains supportive components related to master plan to help understanding the
development of master plan.
Volume 5, Supporting Report, contains information on GIS Development and Topographic Map
Compilation. It also includes other important out puts of the study, such as city ordinance of earthquake
disaster management, earthquake disaster mitigation handbook, and earthquake mitigation and response
checklists. Those outputs will be utilized when implementing the master plan.
Volume 6, Data Book, contains various data used for analysis in this Study. In addition, data related to
earthquake hazard analysis and damage analysis are stored in CD-ROM.
The following foreign exchange rate is applied on this study report;

US$1.00=P56.055
(February 2004)
PREFACE
In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of the Philippines, the Government
of Japan decided to conduct Earthquake Impact Reduction for Metropolitan Manila, Republic of the
Philippines and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
JICA selected and dispatched a study team, headed by Mr. Noboru IKENISHI of Pacific
Consultants International, consisted of Pacific Consultants International, OYO International
Corporation, PASCO Corporation, between August 2002 and March 2004. In addition, JICA set up
an advisory committee headed by Mr. Masayuki WATANABE, Senior Advisor, Institute for
International Cooperation JICA, between August 2002 and March 2004, which examined the study
from specialist and technical point of view.
The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of the
Philippines and conducted field surveys at the study area.
Upon returning to Japan, the team
conducted further studies and prepared this final report.

I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of this project and to the enhancement of
friendly relationship between our two countries.
Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of
the Republic of the Philippines for their close cooperation extended to the team.
March, 2004
Kazuhisa MATSUOKA
Vice-President
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Mr.Kazuhisa MATSUOKA
Vice President
Tokyo, Japan
March 2004
Letter of Transmittal
Dear Mr. MATSUOKA,
We are pleased to formally submit herewith the final report of Earthquake Impact Reduction Study for
Metropolitan Manila, Republic of the Philippines.
This report compiles the result of the study which was undertaken in the Republic of the Philippines from
August 2002 through March 2004 by the Study Team organized by Pacific Consultants International, OYO
International Corporation and Pasco Corporation under the contract with the JICA.
The Final Report is composed of the Summary Report, Main Reports, Supporting Report, and Data
Book. In the main report, existing social and physical conditions of the Metropolitan Manila are
described and earthquake damage analysis was carried out based on the scenario earthquake. Urban
vulnerability of Metropolitan Manila was also analyzed to indicate the regional characteristic of earthquake
damage. Based on the results of these analyses, recommendations for earthquake disaster mitigation for
short, middle, and long term perspectives were prepared as a master plan of this study.
In addition to the report compilation, 1:5,000 scale topographic maps covering the whole Metropolitan
Manila were compiled by digital mapping methodology. Integrated GIS database for the study area was
also developed by the study team. These digital data will support not only the future disaster management
planning, but also the land use planning, environmental management and urban development of the
Finally, we would like to express our sincere gratitude and appreciation to all the officials of your agency,
the JICA advisory Committee, the Embassy of Japan in Philippines, JICA Philippine office, and Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. We also would like to send our great appreciation to all those extended their kind
assistance and cooperation to the Study Team, in particular, relevant officials of Metropolitan Manila
Development Authority and Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, the Philippine counterpart
agencies.
Very truly yours,
Noboru IKENISHI
Team Leader
Earthquake Impact Reduction
Study for Metropolitan Manila,
Republic of the Philippines
METRO MANILA COUNCIL
MMDA Resolution No. 04-03

Series of 2004
DECLARING THE COMMITMENT TO MAKE METRO MANILA SEISMICALLY
SAFE AND ESTABLISHING THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT AMONG THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS OF METRO MANILA IN THE EVENT OF
DISASTERS
WHEREAS, the recent Earthquake Impact Reduction Study for Metro Manila
(MMEIRS) being conducted by the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA),
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) and the Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) with support from the Government of Japan,
indicate that the region is exposed to high risk from a strong-magnitude earthquake;
WHEREAS, aware and conscious about the adverse impact of such risk in the
development of Metropolitan Manila and on the lives and properties of its constituents, there
is a need to implement measures to reduce the vulnerability of the metropolis from the
seismic hazard;
WHEREAS, the Local Government Code and Presidential Decree No. 1566 mandate
the local government units and all instrumentalities of government with the participation of
the private sector to enhance their respective capacities to prevent, prepare for, and respond
effectively to disaster situations respectively;
WHEREAS, the resources that may be needed to cope with large disaster situations,
particularly brought about by a strong earthquake may be beyond the capacity of a single
Local Government Unit in Metro Manila;
WHEREAS, the Metro Manila Council (Council) recognizes the urgent need to
implement necessary measures that will reduce and mitigate the negative impacts of a strong
earthquake in view of the findings of the Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved as it is hereby resolved, pursuant to Section 6
of RA 7924, that the Council hereby declares its commitment to make Metro Manila
seismically safe and hereby establishes the mutual aid agreement among the Local
Government Units in the event of disasters.
Page 2/
DECLARING THE COMMITMENT TO MAKE METRO MANILA SEISMICALLY SAFE
AND ESTABLISHING THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT AMONG THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT UNITS OF METRO MANILA IN THE EVENT OF DISASTERS
X------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
RESOLVED FURTHER, that as part of its commitment, it shall enjoin the Local
Government Units (LGUs) of Metro Manila to:
a. Revitalize their respective Disaster Management Councils and enhance their
emergency preparedness and response capacities particularly to reduce and cope
with earthquake disasters;
b. Include earthquake disaster reduction projects and activities in their respective
City or Municipal Priority Programs and provide financial support thereof; and,
c. Institutionalize each Local Government Unit's Emergency Management Office or
Unit to provide direction and continuity of disaster management programs
implementation duly supported by Executive Orders and Ordinances.
RESOLVED FURTHERMORE, that the Council hereby urges the component
Local Government Units of Metro Manila to bind themselves to mutually assist each other in
the following aspects:
1. Implementing disaster preparedness and mitigation programs by sharing
experiences, knowledge and technical skills;
2. Providing resources and assistance to LGUs that are greatly affected by disasters
and whose needs have gone beyond their means to cope based on pre-arranged
protocols; and,
3. Establishing Metro Manila Disaster Management Clusters in accordance with
geographic contiguity for more efficient programs, response and assistance
management.
RESOLVED FINALLY, that the Council hereby ensures to undertake the
following:
1.
Urge the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority to strengthen itself and the
Metro Manila Disaster Coordinating Council (MMDCC) in order to provide
efficient and effective coordinating mechanism and complement regional disaster
management activities in support to the efforts of the local government units;
2.
Respectfully request the President of the Republic of the Philippines through the
National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC) to certify as urgent the various
bills pending before the House of Congress aimed to strengthen the Philippine's
Disaster Management System; and,
Page 3/
X------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
3.
Further respectfully request the President of the Republic of the Philippines

through the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) to include
disaster management as part of the priority concerns in the Philippine
Development Plan.
Let copies of this Resolution be furnished to the Local Government Units of Metro
Manila, the Member-Agencies of MMDCC, the NDCC and the NEDA.
This Resolution shall take effect upon approval.
DONE this 29th day of January 2004, in Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
BENJAMIN C. ABALOS, JR.

Mayor, Mandaluyong City
Page 4/
X------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
JOEY P. MARQUEZ
Mayor, Paraaque City
Final Report
PROFILE OF THE STUDY
1.
GENERAL
1.1
Study Outline
Outline of the Study is as follows:
Study Title: Study for Earthquake Impact Reduction for Metropolitan Manila in the Republic
of the Philippines (MMEIRS)
Implementation Agency: Japan International Cooperation Agency
Counterpart Agency: Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA)
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS)
Study Period:
1.2
From August 2002 to March 2004
Background and Contents of the Study

Metropolitan Manila, composed of 13 cities and 4 municipalities by its administrative boundaries, is
the political, economic, and cultural center of the Philippines. The population of Metropolitan Manila
is approximately 10 million at present and it is now one of the most densely populated areas in
Southeast Asia. Geographically, Metropolitan Manila is located on Luzon Island.
Numerous
earthquake sources are located in and around it. Among these faults, the Valley Fault System, which
transects the study area, is considered to potentially cause the largest impact to the Metropolitan
Manila area should it generate a large earthquake. Many research studies indicate that active phases of
the Valley Faults are approaching and the estimated magnitude will be around 7 or more. In order to
manage a potential earthquake disaster in Manila, it is necessary to prepare an earthquake disaster
mitigation plan, and to start actions as soon as possible. The objectives of the Study are: 1) to
formulate a master plan for earthquake impact reduction for Metropolitan Manila in the Republic of
the Philippines, and 2) to carry out technology transfer to Philippine counterpart personnel of MMDA
and PHIVOLCS in the course of the Study. Major contents of the Study are: 1) existing data collection
and evaluation, 2) geological survey, 3) social condition survey, 4) Building and infrastructure survey,
5) important public facilities survey and dangerous material treatment facilities survey, 6) GIS
database development, 7) production of 1:5,000 scale digital topographic maps, 8) analysis of
earthquake ground motion and hazards, 9) earthquake damage estimation, 10) preparation of disaster
management plan for Metropolitan Mania, and 11) community based disaster management activities.
2.
EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO
2.1
Scenario Earthquake
Analyzing past historically recorded earthquakes and instrumentally recorded earthquakes, a total 18
earthquakes were selected as scenario earthquakes, which have potential damaging effect to
-1-
Earthquake Impact Reduction Study for Metropolitan Manila in the Republic of the Philippines
Metropolitan Manila; also earthquake ground motion, liquefaction potential, slope stability and
tsunami height are estimated. Finally three models (namely, model 08 (West Valley Faults M.7.2),
Model 13 (Manila Trench M.7.9), Model 18 (1863 Manila Bay M.6.5)), were selected for detail
damage analysis because these scenario earthquakes show typical and severe damages to Metropolitan
Manila.
Model 08, as the worst case, 170,000 residential houses will collapse, 340,000 residential houses will
be partly damaged, 34,000 persons will die, 114,000 persons will be injured.
Fire will breakout and burnt approximately 1,710 hectares and totally 18,000 additional persons will
be killed by this secondary disaster. Moreover, infrastructures and lifelines will also be heavily
damaged.
2.2
Urban Vulnerability against Earthquake Damage

Based on the damage analysis results, urban vulnerability of Metropolitan Manila was analyzed.
Regional vulnerability characteristics against earthquake are as follows:
Type of Vulnerability
Flammability and Evacuation

Difficulty
Building Collapse and Evacuation
Difficulty
Flammability
Evacuation Difficulty
Area
1) Navotas Bay Area
2) Manila North Port Area
3) South Eastern Manila City Area

4) Central Manila Bay Area
1) North Eastern Quezon City Area

2) Western Marikina City Area
3) Eastern Pasig City Area
4) Muntinlupa Laguna Bay Area

5) Mandaluyong Makati City Border
Area
1) Valenzuela-Kalookan South-Quezon west intersection

1) Metropolitan Manila Fringes
- Northern Fringe
- Taguig Fringe
- Las Pinas Fringe
Metropolitan Manila will possibly be separated into four regions by the earthquake impact. Reasons
for regional separation are summarized as follows:
Metropolitan
Manila West
Metropolitan
North,
and Metropolitan
South
Metropolitan
East
Western part of Metropolitan Manila will be isolated from other part of Metropolitan Manila by fire and
building collapse
Northern and Southern part of Metropolitan Manila will be separated by the building collapse and the
geographical condition. The intersecting area between Mandaluyong and Makati has a high possibility of
building collapse; moreover, Pasig River is running through east-west which is naturally disadvantageous in
terms of separation.
All road networks running east-west, which are on the fault will be broken due to the movement. Other roads
running North-South in fault areas will be difficult to use, due to the high number of building collapse.
3.
MASTER PLAN
3.1.1
The Plan
The Master Plan for Earthquake Impact Reduction sets forth basic policy and direction in pursuit of
the vision of a safer Metropolitan Manila. The plan is a road map to achieve the vision. It contains 34
frameworks, each addressing specific goals and objectives. Each framework is not only a stand-alone
avenue to pursue improved levels of risk reduction but also a cross street interconnected with the other
frameworks. The goals, objectives, and frameworks address Metropolitan Manilas most imminent
-2-
Final Report
earthquake disaster management issues. Existing earthquake disaster management systems in the
Philippines is not enough to cope with expected earthquakes damages.
3.1.2
1)
Overall Structure of the Plan

Assumption
Based on the damage estimation by MMEIRS Study of the potential rupture of West Valley Fault,
approximately 40% of the total number of residential buildings within Metropolitan Manila will
collapse or be affected. This building collapse directly affects large numbers of people, since it is
estimated to cause 34,000 deaths and 114,000 injuries. Moreover, additional 18,000 deaths are
anticipated by the fire spreading after the earthquake event. This human loss, together with properties
and economy losses of Metropolitan Manila will be a national crisis.
2)
Vision
The earthquake impact reduction plan for Metropolitan Manila prepared by the Metropolitan
Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study anticipates the mitigation and reduction of the expected
impact. The vision of this plan is to ultimately achieve A Safer Metropolitan Manila from
Earthquake Impact.
3)
Goals, Objectives and Frameworks

To attain this vision, six goals have been addressed as follows:
1)
To develop a national system resistant to earthquake impact
2)
To improve Metropolitan Manilas urban structure resistant to earthquake
3)
To enhance effective risk management system
4)
To increase community resilience
5)
To formulate reconstruction systems
6)
To promote research and technology development for earthquake impact reduction measures.
These goals have 10 objectives, and the objectives are broken down into 34 frameworks. The
frameworks represent main policies and strategies to achieve goals and objectives. This organization
of the vision, goals, objectives, and frameworks is summarized in Figure 1.
4)
Frameworks and Action Plans

The frameworks contain 105 action plans. The action plans are prepared to put in practice the policies
and strategies represented in the frameworks.
3.2
Priority Action Plans

Among the 105 identified action plans in the master plan, 40 of them are selected as high priority
action plans. These selected high priority action plans are essential plans to be initiated as initial steps
within 3-6 years, in accordance with the overall basic strategies to improve the existing situation.
-3-
Final Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STUDY RESULTS
1.
GENERAL
1.1
Introduction
The basic organizational information of the Study and its organizational relationships are as
follows:
Study Title:
Study for Earthquake Impact Reduction for Metropolitan Manila in

the Republic of the Philippines (MMEIRS)
Implementation Agency:
Counterpart Agency:
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA)

Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS)
Study Period:
From August 2002 to March 2004

Government of Japan
Steering Committee
JICA
Government of the Philippines
Advisory Committee
Technical Committee
Study Implementing Body

MMDA
JICA Study Team
PHIVOLCS
Study Organization
1.2
Background of the Study

Metropolitan Manila, which is composed of 13 cities and 4 municipalities, is the political,
economic, and cultural center of the Philippines. The population of Metropolitan Manila is
approximately 10 million at present and it is now one of the most densely populated areas in
Southeast Asia. The rapid urbanization of Metropolitan Manila has resulted in unsatisfactory
infrastructure construction, poor housing condition, highly dense areas, and areas characterized
by mixed land use and other inappropriate conditions. Thus, the potential for natural disaster in
Metro Manila is high and the reduction of its vulnerability is a pressing issue for the safety of
residents.
Geographically, Metropolitan Manila is located on Luzon Island. It is transected or surrounded
by numerous earthquake generators. Among the active faults, the Valley Fault System, which
-1-
transects the eastern part of the study area, is considered to potentially cause the largest impact to
the Metropolitan Manila area should it generate a large maximum earthquake. Recent studies
show that the West Valley Fault has moved at 4 times and generated strong earthquakes within the
last 1400 years. The approximate return period of these earthquakes is less than 500 years and no
event along the West Valley Fault is known after 17th century, it means that the active phases of
the Valley Faults is approaching. Many research studies indicate that the estimated magnitude
will be around 7 or more.
In order to manage the potential earthquake disaster in Metropolitan Manila, it is necessary to
prepare an earthquake disaster mitigation plan, and to start actions as soon as possible. The
disaster management plan will focus on raising awareness of concerned organizations, employ a
comprehensive disaster management approach, and strengthen vertical synergetic networks from
the central government to local governments, and communities.
1.3
Scope of the Study

The objectives of the Study are to:
1) Formulate a master plan for earthquake impact reduction for Metropolitan Manila in the
Republic of the Philippines, and
2) Carry out technology transfer to Philippine counterpart personnel, of MMDA and PHIVOLCS,
in the course of the Study.
The major contents of the Study are, 1) existing data collection and evaluation, 2) geological
survey, 3) social condition survey, 4) building and infrastructure survey, 5) important public
facilities survey and dangerous material treatment facilities survey, 6) GIS database development,
7) production of 1:5,000 scale digital topographic maps, 8) analysis of earthquake ground motion
and hazards, 9) earthquake damage estimation, 10) preparation of disaster management plan for
Metropolitan Manila, and 11) community based disaster management activities.
2.
EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO
2.1
Scenario Earthquake
Based on analyses of historically recorded earthquakes and instrumentally recorded earthquakes,
18 earthquakes are selected as scenario earthquakes, which has potential damage effect to
Metropolitan Manila. The corresponding earthquake ground motion, liquefaction potential, slope
stability and height of tsunami that might be generated are estimated. Finally three models, Model
08 (West Valley Faults), Model 13 (Manila Trench), Model 18 (1863 Manila Bay), are selected for
detailed damage analysis because these scenario earthquakes might cause severe damages to
-2-
Final Report
Model
Magnitude
Fault Mechanism
Scenario
Earthquake
Seismic
(PEIS)
Model 08
7.2
Inland Fault
Almost
VIII,
IX
alongside
Marikina
River and Manila Bay,
Intensity
Tsunami
Will not occur
Model 13
7.9
Subduction
VIII at West of
Metropolitan
Mania,
VII at other area
Maximum 4m, Average
2m alongside Manila
Bay
Model 18
6.5
Unknown
Almost VIII, VII at
Quezon City
Small effect
PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS)

Scale
I
II
III
IV
V
2.2
Japan
Metrological
Agency
Intensity
Modified
Mercalli
Intensity
Condition
Scarcely Perceptible
Slightly Felt
Weak
Moderately Strong
Strong
Scale
VI
II
VII
III
VIII
IV
2-3
IX
Model
Magnitude
VII
VIII, IX
5-6
X, XI
XII
Model 08
7.2
Model 13
7.9
Model 18
6.5
168,300
(12.7%)
339,800
(25.6%)
1,900
(0.1%)
6,600
(0.5%)
14,200
(1.1%)
52,700
(4.0%)
33,500
(0.3%)
113,600
(1.1%)
100
(0.0%)
300
(0.0%)
3,100
(0.0%)
9,500
(0.1%)
Model
Magnitude
Model 08
7.2
Model 13
7.9
Model 18
6.5
Outbreak
500
798 ha
42,100
buildings
1,710 ha
97,800
buildings
7,900 (0.1%)
18,300 (0.2%)
Heavily
Residential Building 1,325,896
Damage
Partly
Dead
Population
9,932,560
Casualty
Injured
Fire Damage
Scenario Earthquake
Wind Speed 3m/s

Fire
VI
Very Strong
Destructive
Very Destructive
Devastating
Completely Devastating
Japan
Metrological
Agency
Intensity
4
Residential Building Damage and Human Casualties
Scenario Earthquake
2.3
Modified
Mercalli
Intensity
Condition
Burnt area and

building
Wind Speed 8m/s
Casualty
Wind Speed 3m/s

Wind Speed 8m/s
-3-
2.4
Infrastructure and Lifeline Damage
Scenario Earthquake
Model
Magnitude
Bridge
213
(with detailed inventory and stability
analysis 189)
Flyover
80
(with detailed inventory and stability
analysis 38)
Model 18
6.5
Bridge
Flyover
Bridge
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
Flyover
Break of pipes or
joints
4000 points
0 points
200 points
Cut of cables
30 km
0 km
4 km
Cut of cables
95 km
0 km
11 km
Heavily
Damaged
8 - 10 %
0 - 0.2%
01%
Partly Damaged
20 25 %
0 - 0.3%
23%
11 %
0.3 %
2.3 %
27 %
2.8%
9.2 %
2%
0%
0%
12 %
0.1%
0.5%
Moderate possibility
of falling-off
PLDT Telephone
Aerial Cable
9,445 km
Underground Cable
3,906 km
Public Purpose Buildings
(Hospital 177, School 1412, Fire Fighting 124, Police 43,
MMDCC Organizations and 17 LGU City and Municipal
Halls 53)
2.5
Model 13
7.9
Large possibility of
falling-off
Water Supply
Distribution Pipes Total 4,615km
Electric Power
Transmission and Distribution Line Total 4,862km
Mid-rise and High-rise

Buildings
Model 08
7.2
10-30
stories
building
981
30-60
stories
building
119
Heavily
Damaged
Partly Damaged
Heavily
Damaged
Partly Damaged
Damage Scenario
Earthquake damage scenario during one week after the earthquake occurrence is compiled for
scenario earthquake model 08 (West Valley Fault, Magnitude 7.2). Furthermore, this is translated
into a script for better understanding.
2.6
Urban Vulnerability against Earthquake Damage

Regional vulnerability characteristics against earthquake are as follows:
Type of Vulnerability
Flammability and Evacuation

Difficulty
Building Collapse and Evacuation
Difficulty
Flammability
Evacuation Difficulty
Area
1) Navotas Bay Area
2) Manila North Port Area
3) South Eastern Manila City Area

4) Central Manila Bay Area
1) North Eastern Quezon City Area

2) Western Marikina City Area
3) Eastern Pasig City Area
4) Muntinlupa Laguna Bay Area

5) Mandaluyong Makati City Border
Area
1) Valenzuela-Kalookan South-Quezon west intersection

1) Metropolitan Manila Fringes
- Northern Fringe
- Taguig Fringe
- Las Pinas Fringe
Metropolitan Manila will possibly be separated into four regions because of the earthquake
impact. Reasons for regional separation are summarized as follows:
-4-
Final Report
Metropolitan
Manila West
Metropolitan
North,
and Metropolitan
South
Metropolitan
East
Western part of Metropolitan Manila will be isolated from other part of Metropolitan Manila by fire and
building collapse
Northern and Southern part of Metropolitan Manila will be separated by the building collapse and the
geographical condition. The intersecting area between Mandaluyong and Makati has a high possibility of
building collapse; moreover, Pasig River is running east-west which is naturally disadvantageous in terms of
separation.
All road networks running east-west, which are on the fault will be broken due to the movement. Other roads
running North-South in fault areas will be difficult to use, due to the high number of building collapse.
3.
MASTER PLAN
3.1
The Plan
The Master Plan for Earthquake Impact Reduction sets forth basic policy and direction in pursuit
of the vision of a safer Metropolitan Manila. The plan is a road map to achieve the vision. It
contains 34 frameworks, each addressing specific goals and objectives. Each framework is not
only a stand-alone avenue to pursue improved levels of risk reduction but also a cross street
interconnected with the other frameworks. The goals, objectives, and frameworks address
Metropolitan Manilas most imminent earthquake disaster management issues. Existing
earthquake disaster management system in the Philippines is not enough to cope with expected
earthquakes damages
Each framework describes the following:
-
Understandings / Concerns
Basic policy / Basic concept of framework
Action plans
The Basic policy / Basic concept of framework include several strategies that are encapsulated in
various action plans designed to lead to accomplishment of the frameworks goal and objectives.
The highest priority of these action plans, or Priority Action Plans, are then presented in
Chapter 6 in a format that includes the aim and outline of the project and the implementing agency
responsible for undertaking the action.
3.2
Overall structure of the Plan

1)
Assumption
Based on the damage estimation by MMEIRS Study of the potential rupture of West Valley Fault,
approximately 40% of the total number of residential buildings within Metropolitan Manila will
collapse or be affected. This building collapse directly affects large numbers of people, since it is
estimated to cause 34,000 deaths and 114,000 injuries. Moreover, additional 18,000 deaths are
anticipated by the fire spreading after the earthquake event. This human loss, together with
properties and economy losses of Metropolitan Manila will be a national crisis.
-5-
2)
Vision
The earthquake impact reduction plan for Metropolitan Manila prepared by the Metropolitan
Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study anticipates the mitigation and reduction of the
expected impact. The vision of this plan is to ultimately achieve A Safer Metropolitan Manila
from Earthquake Impact.
3)
Goals, Objectives and Frameworks

To attain this vision, six goals have been addressed as follows:
1)
To develop a national system resistant to earthquake impact
2)
To improve Metropolitan Manilas urban structure resistant to earthquake
3)
To enhance effective risk management system
4)
To increase community resilience
5)
To formulate reconstruction systems
6)
To promote research and technology development for earthquake impact reduction

measures.
These goals have 10 objectives, and the objectives are broken down into 34 frameworks. The
frameworks represent main policies and strategies to achieve goals and objectives.
This
organization of the vision, goals, objectives, and frameworks is summarized in Figure 1.

4)
Frameworks and Action Plans

The frameworks contain 105 action plans. The action plans are prepared to put in practice the
policies and strategies represented in the frameworks.
-6-
Final Report
Vision
Goals
To develop national
system resistant to
earthquake impact
To improve
Metropolitan
Manila's urban
structure resistant
to earthquake
Objectives
To increase social and
community
sustainability
To increase resistance of
Metropolitan Manila's
vulnerable areas
Metro Manila's
buildings
Metro Manila's
buildings
To prevent secondary
effects and damages
To strengthen disaster
management system
Frameworks
NSD-1
Protect stability of national government function
NSD-2
Protect stability of socio-economic system
USI-1
USI-2
USI-3
USI-4
Promote earthquake resistant urban development

Promote flameproof urban development
Promote spatial urban development
Promote earthquake-resistant buildings
USI-5
Promote earthquake-resistant public facilities
USI-6
Promote earthquake-resistant infrastructure
USI-7
Promote earthquake-resistant lifeline
RMS-12
Promote fire preparedness and mitigation including

handling hazardous materials
Take measures against tsunami
Enhance legal basis for disaster management
Strengthen institutional capacity for implementing
Preparedness and mitigation measures
Strengthen inter-institutional coordination
Strengthen institutional disaster response capability
Develop operation systems and procedures
Enhance capability of fire suppression and hazardous
material abatement
Secure evacuation route and evacuation sites
Secure water, food, and other necessaries
Enhance emergency health and medical response
system
Establish emergency transportation system
RMS-13
Establish search and rescue system
RMS-14
RMS-15
RMS-16
Establish information and communication system

Establish geographic information system
Manage emergency public information
RMS-1
RMS-2
RMS-3
RMS-4
RMS-5
RMS-6
RMS-7
A Safer
Metropolitan
Manila from
Earthquake
Impact
To enhance
effective risk
management
system
RMS-8
RMS-9
RMS-10
To improve disaster
response capability
RMS-11
To ensure access to
critical information
To establish disaster
management mechanism
through enhancement of
social capital
To increase
community
resilience
To formulate
reconstruction
systems
To improve community
recovery capability
CRI-1
CRI-2
RSF-1
RSF-2
RSF-3
RSF-4
RSF-5
RSF-6
To promote research
and technology
development for
earthquake impact
reduction measures
Figure 1.
To sustain research and

effective transfer of
technology
R&D-1
Enhance self reliant and mutual help for efficient risk

management capacity
Inculcate a disaster mitigation culture in future
generations
Supply temporary refugee housings
Prepare emergency assistance for everyday life
Establish debris clearance and management system
Restore public and social services
Establish post-disaster reconstruction system of the
damaged area
Enhance institutional aspect
Promote sustained research and development on

earthquake
Structure of the Disaster Management Plan for Metropolitan Manila
-7-
3.3
High Priority Action Plans

Among the 105 identified priority action plans in the master plan, 40 of them are selected as high
priority action plans. These selected high priority action plans are essential plans to be initiated as
initial steps within 3-6 years, in accordance with the overall basic strategies to improve the
existing situation. Table 3.3.1shows the list of high priority action plans.
Table 3.3.1
Concept 1
List of High Priority Action Plans
Enhance legal framework and institutional capacity for

disaster management
Concept 3Strengthen community preparedness for the earthquake
Strategy 1: Enhance legal basis for disaster management
Strategy 1: Enhance self reliant and mutual help for efficient risk
management capacity
RMS-3: Strengthen legal basis for disaster management at the national level
by updating/replacing PD1566
CRI-1:
Knowledge development
vulnerabilities
RMS-3: Strengthen legal basis at the local level by adopting model

city/municipal ordinance
Strategy 2: Strengthen
institutional
capacity
for
mitigation,
preparedness and response
CRI-1:
Enhance the community governance and linkage with LGUs
CRI-1:
Enhance potential emergency management capacities
RMS-4: Promote the reorganization and revitalization of city/municipal and

barangay Disaster Coordinating Councils
CRI-1:
Enhance the administrative system supporting community activities
RMS-4: Promote local government mitigation planning through

implementation of the Earthquake Mitigation Handbook and the
Earthquake Mitigation and Response Checklists -- Local Planning
Guide
Strategy 2: Inculcate a disaster mitigation culture in future generations
RMS-4: Conduct training needs assessment and develop capacity building

programs for local and barangay DCCs
CRI-2:
Enhance school risk management capacity
RMS-6: Encourage local emergency response planning through use of the

Earthquake Mitigation and Response Checklists---Local Planning
Guide
CRI-2:
Inculcate a disaster mitigation culture in future generations
RMS-6 /RMS-16: Encourage adoption and utilization of Emergency

Response Pocket Guide and Guide for Managing Information by
agencies and LGUs
Strategy 3: Strengthen inter-institutional coordination
Concept 4 Reduce dangers of residential buildings
RMS-5: Strengthen MMDCC by updating its structure and organizing and

implementing a MMDCC Work Plan
USI-1:
Promote subdivision development procedures
RMS-5: Encourage inter-local cooperation through zonation of LGUs and

Mutual Aid Agreements
USI-3:
Promote disaster resistant urban development/ re-development
Concept 2Build Basic Capacity for Relief and Recovery
USI-3:
Enforce and develop laws and regulations related to urban planning

and building code
Strategy 1: Enhance emergency health and medical response system
USI-4:
Research and development on strengthening buildings
RMS-11: Enhance organizational response capacities
USI-4:
Promote construction and improvement for earthquake resistant

buildings
about
earthquake
hazards
and
Strategy 1: Strengthen buildings against earthquake
RMS-11: Improve government hospital capacities
Strategy 2: Avoid fire outbreaks from residential buildings
RMS-11: Enhance logistics and medical supplies
USI-2:
Tie down and stabilize propane cylinders against earthquake

shaking
Strategy 2: Establish emergency transportation system
USI-2:
Promote replacement to unbreakable (plastic-bottled) gasoline

vending
RMS-12: Establish emergency road network
Strategy 3: Promote research and technology development on

earthquake impact
RMS-12: Secure road between Batangas Port to Metropolitan Manila south

region
R&D-1:
RMS-12: Convert one portion of Manila port to earthquake resistant

construction
Concept 5 Enhance National System Resistant to Earthquake
RMS-12: Secure road between Subic port/ Clark field to Metropolitan Manila
North region
Strategy 1: Protect stability of national government function
RMS-12: Construct Laguna de bay northern shore unloading facility
NSD-1:
RMS-12: Secure Ninoy Aquino airport function

Strategy 3: Secure water
NSD-1: Promote urban reform around the nationally important facilities

Strategy 2: Protect stability of socio-economic system
Evaluate activity of the valley fault system
Enhance continuity of national government function with the

Presidents office
RMS-10: Secure the large scaled water source for drinking
NSD-2:
Enhance emergency measures by businesses
RMS-10: Formulate emergency supply system of water, (food, and other

necessities)
NSD-2:
Enhance safety of online financial services
NSD-2:
Enhance disaster finance system
-8-
Final Report
Table of Contents
Manila Proclamation on Seismic Safety
Profile of the Study
Executive Summary of the Study Results
Main Report
Main Report 1
<Part I Outline of the Study>
Chapter 1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.4
Introduction 1-1
Background of the Study 1-1
Scope of the Study 1-2
Study Objectives 1-2
Study Area 1-2
Schedule of the Study 1-4
Implementing Organizations 1-5
Major Activities of the Study 1-9
Chapter 2.
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.4
Earthquake Damage Scenario 2-1
Earthquake Scenario Setting and Ground Motion 2-1

Fault in the Philippines 2-1
Earthquake Generators 2-2
Earthquake Condition 2-3
Scenario Earthquakes 2-5
Earthquake Ground Motion 2-7
Earthquake Damage and Urban Vulnerability 2-10
Summary of Earthquake Damage 2-10
Earthquake Damage Scenario During One Week from Occurrence of Earthquake 2-11
Regional Urban Vulnerability 2-17
Approach 2-17
Comprehensive Regional Vulnerability and its Characteristics 2-18
Possible Regional Separation 2-19
Facts and Damage Estimation by LGUs 2-22
Chapter 3.
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
General 1-1
Recommendations Summary 3-1
Overall Master Plan 3-1

Assumption 3-1
Vision 3-1
Goals, Objectives and Frameworks 3-1
Frameworks and Action Plans 3-1
High Priority Action Plans 3-6
Prioritization Needs and Process 3-6
Selected High Priority Action Plans 3-6
-i-
<Part II
Master Plan and Action Plans for Safer Metropolitan Manila>
Chapter 4.
4.1
4.2
4.3
The Vision -A Safer Metropolitan Manila from Earthquake Impact- 4-1

The Goals 4-1
The Plan 4-3
Chapter 5.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
Master Plan for Earthquake Impact Reduction 5-1
Introduction 5-1
Development of National System Resistant to Earthquake Impact 5-1
Improvement of Metropolitan Manilas Urban Structure Resistant to Earthquake 5-5
Enhancement of Effective Risk Management Systems 5-21
Increasing Community Resilience 5-52
Formulation of Reconstruction Systems 5-60
Research And Technology Promotion for Earthquake Impact Reduction Measures 5-70
Chapter 6.
6.1
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
Vision and Goals 4-1
Priority Action Plans 6-1
Definition of Priority Action Plans 6-1

General 6-1
Definition of High Priority Action Plans and Priority Action Plans 6-1
Selecting High Priority Action Plans 6-1
Areas of Focus 6-1
Additional Criteria for Selection 6-2
Selected Priority Action Plans 6-3
Main Report 2
<Part III
Understandings for Master Plan Conditions, Earthquake Damages and Urban

Vulnerabilities>
Background of Metropolitan Manila for Disaster Management Plan
Part III-1
Chapter 7.
7.1
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.2
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4
7.2.5
7.2.6
Past Natural Disaster Damages, Responses and Recovery Processes 7-1

Recent Disaster Situation 7-1
Presidential Decree No. 1566 as basis for Disaster Countermeasure 7-2
Past Earthquake Disaster-Damages, Responses and Recovery Processes 7-9
Latest Large Earthquake Disaster in Baguio 7-9
Outline of the Earthquake Damages 7-9
Emergency Management by the Government of Philippines 7-10
Restoration of Roads and Bridges 7-10
Rehabilitation/Clearing of Damaged Buildings 7-11
Cost Estimation by Earthquake Damage 7-11
Chapter 8.
8.1
8.1.1
8.1.2
8.1.3
8.2
8.2.1
Past Major Natural Disaster in the Philippines 7-1
Social Systems and Conditions 8-1
Socio-economic Condition of Metropolitan Manila 8-1

Economic Condition 8-1
Urban Development 8-2
Population 8-8
Urban Planning Systems in Metropolitan Manila 8-10
Land Use Planning Systems 8-10
-ii-
Final Report
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.3
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.4
8.4.1
8.4.2
8.4.3
8.4.4
8.4.5
8.4.6
8.5
8.6
8.6.1
8.6.2
8.6.3
8.6.4
8.6.5
8.6.6
8.6.7
8.6.8
8.6.9
Systems for Urban Developments 8-12

Urban Infrastructures 8-15
Structure, Condition and its Vulnerability of Metropolitan Manila 8-16
General 8-16
Natural Condition and Urban Development of Metropolitan Manila 8-17
Vulnerability Components of Metropolitan Manila 8-18
Communities in Metropolitan Manila 8-25
Introduction 8-25
Definition of Community 8-25
Difference between Barangay and Community 8-25
Characteristics of Communities in Metropolitan Manila 8-26
Relation between Community and Barangay 8-30
Key Implication to Disaster Management Activities at the Community Level 8-33
Common Resources in the Community 8-33
Community Based Disaster Management Activities -Characteristics of Selected Communities- 8-35
Objectives 8-35
Outline of the Community Activities 8-35
Selection of the Pilot Communities 8-37
Basic Characteristics of the Selected Communities 8-38
Social Characteristics of the Selected Communities 8-39
Major Observations 8-41
Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment 8-42
Enhancing Driving Forces and Minimizing Hindrances 8-44
Building and Infrastructure Survey and Establishment of GIS Database 8-47
Chapter 9.
9.1
9.2
9.2.1
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.3
9.3.1
9.3.2
9.3.3
9.4
Urban Conditions 9-1
Buildings 9-1
Infrastructures 9-38
Roads 9-38
Bridges and Flyovers 9-40
Ports and Harbors 9-44
Angat Dam 9-49
Lifelines 9-56
Water 9-56
Electricity 9-57
Telecommunications 9-58
Hazardous Facilities 9-59
Chapter 10.
Disaster Management Systems 10-1
10.1
Introduction 10-1
10.1.1
Methodology 10-1
10.1.2
System of Governance in Metropolitan Manila 10-3
10.2
Legal Framework for Disaster Management 10-4
10.2.1
Overview of Disaster Management Laws 10-4
10.2.2
Overview of Disaster Management Policy 10-5
10.2.3
Laws and Regulations at the Local and Regional Level 10-6
10.2.4
National Building Code of the Philippines (PD 1096) 10-6
10.2.5
Fire Code of the Philippines (PD 1185) 10-7
10.3
Institutional System 10-7
10.3.1
National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC) 10-7
10.3.2
The Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordinating Council 10-9
10.3.3
City and Municipal Disaster Coordinating Councils in Metro Manila 10-16
10.3.4
Review of Six City/Municipality Disaster Coordinating Councils 10-17
-iii-
10.4
Review of Barangays 10-24
10.4.1
Makati Barangays 10-24
10.4.2
Manila Barangays 10-24
10.4.3
Navotas Barangays 10-25
10.4.4
Pasig Barangays 10-26
10.4.5
Quezon City Barangays 10-26
10.4.6
Taguig Barangays 10-27
10.5
Disaster Management Planning 10-28
10.5.1
Concepts and Planning Guidance 10-28
10.5.2
Review of Existing Plans 10-29
10.6
Calamity Response Measures 10-40
10.6.1
Establishment of A Special Facility for the Importation and Donation of Relief Goods and Equipment
in Calamity-Stricken Areas 10-40
10.6.2
Calamity Fund Management 10-41
10.6.3
Policies, Procedures and Criteria for Calamity Area Declaration. 10-42
10.6.4
Policies and Procedures on the Provision of Financial Assistance to Victims of Disasters 10-44
10.7
Analysis of Past Assessments, Surveys and Studies 10-45
10.7.1
Lessons Learned from the Luzon Earthquake 10-45
10.7.2
Findings of the OCD-sponsored Earthquake Tabletop Exercise 10-46
10.7.3
Findings of the First MMEIRS Workshop 10-47
10.7.4
The Philippine Disaster Management Story: Issues and Challenges 10-48
10.7.5
An Assessment of Disaster Preparedness in the NCR/Metro Manila Area 10-49
10.7.6
GESI Emergency Response Questionnaire 10-50
10.7.7
Preparedness for Earthquake and Terrorism in Makati City 10-51
Chapter 11.
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.3.1
11.3.2
11.3.3
11.4
11.4.1
11.4.2
11.4.3
11.4.4
11.4.5
11.5
11.5.1
11.5.2
11.5.3
11.5.4
11.5.5
11.5.6
11.5.7
11.6
11.6.1
11.6.2
11.6.3
11.6.4
11.7
Review of Health Emergency Management System 11-1
Introduction 11-1
Objectives 11-1
Methodology 11-2
Assessment Area 11-2
Target Organization 11-3
Survey Method 11-3
Review of Present Organization and Resources 11-4
Organizational and Institutional System 11-4
Health Emergency Management Program 11-7
Medical Service System 11-9
Training and Public Education 11-16
Sanitary Service and Epidemiology 11-17
Local Government Capability for Health Emergency Management 11-18
Organization of Health Office 11-18
Coordinating Activities 11-18
Mass Casualty Management 11-18
Epidemiology, Sanitation and Relief Activities 11-20
Training 11-21
Resources and Logistical Support 11-21
LGUs Special Concerns for Earthquake Disasters 11-21
Major Problems Identified 11-22
General 11-22
Organization and Institutional System 11-23
Health Emergency Management Program 11-23
Medical and Health Service System 11-24
Toward the formulation of the Disaster Management Plan 11-24
-iv-
Final Report
Part III-2
Earthquake Impact Characteristics in Metropolitan Manila
Chapter 12.
12.1
12.1.1
12.1.2
12.1.3
12.2
12.2.1
12.2.2
12.2.3
12.3
12.3.1
12.3.2
12.4
12.4.1
12.4.2
12.4.3
12.4.4
12.4.5
12.4.6
12.5
12.5.1
12.5.2
12.6
12.6.1
12.6.2
12.6.3
12.6.4
12.6.5
12.7
12.7.1
12.7.2
12.7.3
Geomorphological and Geological Features of the Study Area 12-1

Fault in the Philippines 12-1
Geomorphological and Geological Features of the Study Area 12-2
Existing Probabilistic Estimation of Ground Motion 12-9
Faults Condition 12-10
Earthquake Condition 12-13
Ground Modeling and Those Parameters for Ground Motion Estimation 12-22
Feature of Ground Condition in Metro Manila 12-22
Ground Modeling for Seismic Motion Analysis 12-27
Estimated Ground Motion 12-37
General 12-37
Bedrock motion analysis method 12-39
Subsurface amplification analysis method 12-41
Simulation of December 12, 1999 Earthquake and August 1, 1968 Earthquake 12-43
Calculation of Earthquake Ground Motion 12-44
Issues on Ground Motion Estimation 12-49
Estimated Tsunami Height 12-51
Tsunami Height Evaluation Method 12-51
Estimated Tsunami Height 12-53
Estimated Liquefaction Potential 12-55
General 12-55
Analysis Procedure 12-56
Method of Calculation 12-57
Precondition for the Analysis 12-58
Liquefaction Potential 12-63
Estimated Slope Stability Potential 12-66
General 12-66
Analysis Procedure 12-68
Slope Stability 12-73
Chapter 13.
13.1
13.2
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.3
13.3.1
13.3.2
13.3.3
13.3.4
13.3.5
13.4
13.4.1
13.4.2
13.4.3
13.5
13.5.1
13.5.2
13.5.3
Consideration of Scenario Earthquakes and Hazards 12-1
Earthquake Damage Estimation 13-1
Earthquake Scenario 13-1

Hazards 13-3
Earthquake Ground Motion 13-3
Liquefaction Potential 13-3
Building Damages 13-13
Building Inventory 13-14
Methodology 13-22
Damage Estimation 13-26
Damage to Public Facilities 13-36
Damage to High-rise Buildings 13-37
Human Casualties 13-37
Methodology 13-38
Validation 13-48
Fire 13-50
Fire Outbreak Statistics 13-50
Fire Outbreak after Earthquake 13-51
Fire Spread Possibility 13-53
-v-
13.5.4
13.6
13.6.1
13.6.2
13.6.3
13.7
13.7.1
13.8
13.8.1
13.8.2
13.9
13.9.1
13.9.2
13.9.3

Lifelines 13-60
Water Supply Pipeline 13-60
Electric Power Supply Cable 13-65
Telecommunication Cable 13-69
Bridges And Flyovers 13-72
Bridge Damage Estimation 13-72
Transportation 13-86
Port 13-86
Airport 13-86
Angat Dam 13-89
Review of Existing Report 13-89
Location of West Valley Fault System and Angat Dam 13-90
Earthquake Effect 13-91
Chapter 14.
Urban Spatial Analysis on Vulnerability for Earthquake in Metropolitan

Manila 14-1
14.1
Introduction 14-1
14.2
Regional Vulnerability Evaluation 14-1
14.2.1
General 14-1
14.2.2
Building Collapse 14-4
14.2.3
Flammability 14-7
14.2.4
Evacuation Difficulty 14-11
14.2.5
Comprehensive Regional Vulnerability and its Characteristics 14-14
14.2.6
Possible Regional Separation 14-17
14.3
Resource and Vulnerability Evaluation 14-19
14.3.1
General 14-19
14.3.2
Fire Extinguishing Service Shortage 14-21
14.3.3
Evacuation Facility Shortage 14-24
14.3.4
Hospital Service Shortage 14-27
14.3.5
Evacuation Area Shortage 14-30
Chapter 15.
15.1
15.2
Earthquake Damage Scenario During One Week from Occurrence of Earthquake 15-1
15.3
Earthquake Damage Script During One Week from Occurrence of Earthquake 15-4
15.3.1
Day 1 15-4
15.3.2
Day 2-3 15-5
15.3.3
Day 4-7 15-6
Main Report 3
<Part IV
Chapter 16.
Understandings for Master Plan Systems and Planning related Components>

Legal and Institutional Arrangements for Disaster Management 16-1
16.1
Evaluation of the Current Disaster Management System 16-1
16.1.1
General Framework and Methodology 16-1
16.1.2
The Capability Assessment 16-1
16.1.3
The Interviews 16-4
16.1.4
The Tabletop Exercise 16-4
16.1.5
Capacity Building and Awareness Raising at the Second MMEIRS Workshop 16-5
16.1.6
The Workshop on Earthquake Mitigation Checklist (Makati City) 16-6
-vi-
Final Report
Seminar-Workshop on Emergency Response 16-7

Development of Disaster Management Tools 16-9
Legal Basis for Disaster Management 16-9
Existing Laws 16-9
Proposed Legislation 16-11
Review of Institutional Arrangements 16-13
General 16-13
Disaster Coordinating Councils in Metropolitan Manila 16-15
An Analysis of the Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordinating Council 16-18
Key Informants Impressions of the MMDCC 16-22
Evaluation of the City Disaster Coordinating Councils and the Municipal Disaster Coordinating Councils
16-22
16.5.1
City and Municipality Funding 16-23
16.6
The Barangay Disaster Coordinating Councils: From Paper Tiger to Working Kittens 16-24
16.7
Current Disaster Management Program Initiatives 16-26
16.7.1
NDCCs National Committees 16-26
16.7.2
Other Initiatives 16-27
16.8
Training and Capacity Building Programs 16-27
16.9
Strengthening Disaster Management Systems, Institutions, and Capabilities 16-28
16.9.1
Enhancing Institutional Arrangements 16-28
16.9.2
Institutionalizing Disaster Risk Management 16-29
16.9.3
Developing Capabilities for Planning and Response 16-30
16.9.4
Developing the Framework for Earthquake Risk Reduction 16-31
16.9.5
Strengthening Institutions and Capabilities 16-31
16.10
Recommendations to Enhance Institutional Capabilities 16-32
16.10.1 Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordinating Council (MMDCC) 16-32
16.10.2 City/Municipal Disaster Coordinating Councils (CDCC/MDCC) 16-34
16.10.3 Barangay Disaster Coordinating Councils 16-43
16.11
Proposed Zonification of Cities for More Effective Disaster Management Scheme 16-44
16.11.1 The Zonification Concept 16-44
16.11.2 Implementation of Zonification through Adoption of Mutual Aid and the Incident Command System
16-45
16.12
Establish Policies, Institutional Arrangements, Plans, and Procedures for Recovery 16-49
16.12.1 Establish Pre-Disaster Policies and Institutional Arrangements for Post-Disaster Reconstruction and
Mitigation 16-49
16.12.2 Prepare Recovery Plans and Procedures to Ease Post-Disaster Human and Physical Recovery and
Rehabilitation 16-50
16.1.7
16.1.8
16.2
16.2.1
16.2.2
16.3
16.3.1
16.3.2
16.4
16.4.1
16.5
Chapter 17.
17.1
17.2
17.3
17.3.1
17.3.2
17.3.3
17.3.4
17.3.5
17.3.6
17.4
17.4.1
17.4.2
17.4.3
Outline of Earthquake Impact Mitigation Components for Metropolitan

Manila 17-1
Introduction 17-1
Target of Metropolitan Manila Earthquake Preparedness and Mitigation Plan 17-2
Preventive Measures 17-3
Measures for Earthquake-resistant Buildings 17-3
Fire Preparedness and Mitigation 17-4
Earthquake-resistant Infrastructure, Lifeline, and Public Facilities 17-5
Improvement of Awareness of Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation 17-6
Urban Spatial Structure 17-6
Research Work 17-7
Emergency Response 17-8
Information and Communications System 17-8
Fire Services and Countermeasure Against Hazardous Materials 17-8
Evacuation Route and Evacuation sites (Refugee Sites) 17-10
-vii-
Measures against Tsunami 17-10

Emergency Transportation Routes 17-10
Medical and Health Emergency Response 17-11
Temporary Refugee Housings 17-12
Emergency Assistance for Everyday Life 17-13
Disposal of Rubble and Debris 17-13
Treatment of Corpses 17-13
Peace and Order Keeping 17-13
Finances and Credits 17-13
Assistance Receiving System 17-13
17.4.4
17.4.5
17.4.6
17.4.7
17.4.8
17.4.9
17.4.10
17.4.11
17.4.12
17.4.13
Chapter 18.
18.1
18.1.1
18.1.2
18.2
18.2.1
18.2.2
18.2.3
18.2.4
18.2.5
18.2.6
18.3
18.3.1
18.3.2
18.3.3
18.3.4
18.4
18.4.1
18.4.2
Urban Spatial Components 18-1
Identified Issues 18-1

Identified Issues from Regional Vulnerability Analysis 18-1
Identified Issues from Resource and Vulnerability Evaluation 18-1
Key Directions 18-2
Key Directions for High Building Collapse Areas 18-2
Key Directions for High Flammability Areas 18-2
Key Directions related to Evacuation 18-2
Key Directions for Hospital Service Shortage Areas 18-3
Key Directions for Comprehensively Vulnerable Areas 18-3
Key Directions for Areas Possibly Separated 18-3
Possible Measures 18-3
Measures for High Building Collapse Areas 18-3
Measures related to Flammability 18-3
Measures related to Evacuation 18-4
Measures for Possible Regional Separating Areas 18-6
Damage Mitigation Assessment and Need for Application of Urban Re-development Procedures 18-7
Damage Mitigation Estimation on Fire 18-7
Need for Application of Urban Re-development Procedures 18-9
Chapter 19.
Buildings, Infrastructure and Lifelines Components 19-1
19.1
Buildings 19-1
19.1.1
Recommendations for Building Units 19-1
19.1.2
Recommendation from Building Engineering Viewpoint for Urban Planning 19-4
19.2
Infrastructure 19-9
19.2.1
Road 19-9
19.2.2
Bridge 19-12
19.2.3
Airport 19-19
19.2.4
Port 19-20
19.3
Lifelines 19-22
19.3.1
Damages on Lifeline Facilities and its effects 19-23
19.3.2
Characteristics of Damage and Recovery for Lifelines 19-24
19.3.3
Strengthening of Lifeline Facilities and Networks 19-25
Chapter 20.
Fire and Hazardous Treatment and Management 20-1
20.1
Fire Emergency Response 20-1
20.1.1
Existing Conditions of Fire-causing Factors 20-1
20.1.2
Fire Fighting Capacity 20-5
20.1.3
Recommendations 20-11
-viii-
Final Report
Chapter 21.
21.1
21.1.1
21.2
21.2.1
21.3
21.4
21.4.1
21.4.2
21.4.3
21.4.4
21.4.5
21.5
21.5.1
21.6
21.6.1
Chapter 22.
22.1
22.2
22.3
22.3.1
22.3.2
22.4
22.5
22.6
22.7
Medical and Health Emergency Response 21-1
Capacity of Health Resources 21-1

Estimated Damages by a West Valley Fault Model 21-1
Assessment of Health Response Capacity and Capability 21-7
Governmental Response Area 21-7
Important Issues to be Concluded in the Plan 21-10
Planning Issues 21-11
Target Emergency Level 21-11
Objectives 21-11
Strategies 21-11
Area to be covered by the plan 21-12
Major Planning Issues 21-13
Role and Responsibility of Activities 21-23
Overall Response Activities and their Responsible Level 21-23
List of Actions to Strengthen the Response Capacity 21-25
Feedback from the 2nd Workshop on Health Issues 21-25
Local Governance and Community Disaster Management 22-1
Basic Principle of Community Based Disaster Management 22-1

Plan and Tasks 22-2
Dissemination Framework 22-3
Agreement on Supporting Disaster Management Activity in Communities 22-3
Publication of Community Activity Guidebook 22-3
Lessons 22-5
Community Responsibilities for Earthquake Disaster Management 22-5
Local Governance and Community Governance 22-6
Community Resilience and Social Capital Enhancement 22-6
-ix-
Supporting Report
<Part V
GIS Development and Topographical Map Compilation>
Chapter 1.
Topographical Mapping
Chapter 2.
GIS Database System
<Part VI
Appendices>
Outputs of the Study

1.
City Ordinance on Disaster Management
2.
Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Handbook
3.
Earthquake Mitigation and Response Checklists -Local Planning Guide4.
Guide for Managing Information Concerning Disasters
5.
Community Activity Guidebook
Other Materials
Records of Workshops and Seminars
Sub contract outputs and other analysis (stored only in CD)
-x-
Final Report
List of Tables
Table 1.3.1
Table 1.3.2
Table 1.3.3
Table 1.3.4
Table 1.4.1
Members of the Study Team and Assignments to be covered 1-6

Members of the Steering Committee 1-7
Members of the Technical Committee 1-7
Members of the Counterpart 1-9
Major Topics of the Study 1-10
Table 2.1.1
Table 2.1.2
Table 2.1.3
Table 2.2.1
Table 2.2.2
Table 2.3.1
Table 2.3.2
Destructive Earthquakes that Affected Metropolitan Manila and Estimated PGA 2-4
Fault Model Parameters of Scenario Earthquakes for Hazard Estimation 2-7
PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS) 2-8
Area of High Vulnerability 2-18
High Vulnerable Area by Type 2-19
Table 3.1.1
Table 3.1.1
Table 3.1.1
Table 3.2.1
Table 3.2.2
Frameworks and List of Action Plans (1) 3-3

Areas of Focus for Prioritization 3-6
Description of High Priority Action Plans 3-7
Table 6.2.1
Table 6.2.2
Table 6.2.3
List of High Priority Action Plans (Short/Medium List) 6-3

Description of High Priority Action Plans 6-6
List of Priority Action Plans (Long List) 6-11
Table 7.1.1
Table 7.1.2
Table 7.1.3
Table 7.1.4
Table 7.1.5
Table 7.1.6
Summary of Natural and Manmade Disasters from 1990 to 2001 7-3

Lessons Learned from Past Disasters (NDCC and OCD) - Earthquake 7-5
Lessons Learned from Past Disasters (NDCC and OCD) - Fire 7-6
Lessons Learned from Past Disasters (NDCC and OCD) - Flood 7-6
Lessons Learned from Past Disasters (NDCC and OCD) - Tropical cyclones 7-7
Lessons Learned from Past Disasters (NDCC and OCD) - Volcanic Eruption 7-8
Table 8.1.1
Table 8.1.2
Table 8.1.3
Table 8.1.4
Table 8.1.5
Table 8.1.6
Table 8.3.1
Table 8.6.1
Table 8.6.2
Table 8.6.3
Table 8.6.4
Table 8.6.5
Table 8.6.6
Table 8.6.7
Share of Metropolitan Manila in the Total Economys GDP 8-1

Per Capita GDP in Metropolitan Manila and National 8-1
Poverty Incidence 8-2
Land Use Classification in Metropolitan Manila 8-4
Definition of Classification of Existing Land Use Map 8-5
Night-time Population in Metropolitan Manila 8-8
Migration to Metropolitan Manila 8-20
Community Based Disaster Management Activities 8-37
Characteristic Features of the Selected Communities 8-39
Viewpoint of Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment 8-43
Applicability of Current CBDM Activities 8-45
Force Field Analysis 8-45
Countermeasures for Enhancement and Mitigation 8-46
Summary Table of Detailed Building and Infrastructure Survey 8-54
-xi-
Table 9.1.1
Table 9.1.2
Table 9.1.3
Table 9.1.4
Table 9.1.5
Table 9.1.6
Table 9.1.7
Table 9.1.8
Table 9.1.9
Table 9.1.10
Table 9.1.11
Table 9.1.12
Table 9.1.13
Table 9.1.14
Table 9.2.1
Table 9.2.2
Table 9.2.3
Table 9.2.4
Table 9.3.1
Table 9.3.2
Table 9.4.1
Table 9.4.2
Table 9.4.3
Table 9.4.4
General Information on Building by LGU 9-2

Definition of Building Type 9-5
Number of Household by Type of Building 9-6
Building Type Distribution by District 9-6
Building Outer Wall Material Distribution by LGU 9-8
Building Construction Year Distribution by LGU 9-12
Mid-rise and High-rise Buildings in Metropolitan Manila 9-18
Contents of Public and Governmental Facility Buildings 9-18
Police Stations in Metropolitan Manila 9-19
Fire Stations in Metropolitan Manila 9-19
Hospitals in Metropolitan Manila 9-20
Schools in Metropolitan Manila 9-20
Results of Building Diagnosis for Public Buildings 9-31
Chronologies of Coefficients and Factors in Seismic Design 9-36
Distribution of Road Network in Metropolitan Manila 9-38
Summary of Bridges and Flyovers Inventory in NCR 9-41
Facilities of Manila North Harbor 9-46
List of Berths in MICT 9-47
Contents of Lifeline Facilities 9-56
Lifeline Facilities in Metropolitan Manila 9-56
Contents of Hazardous Facilities 9-59
Hazardous Materials Treatment Facilities in Metropolitan Manila 9-59
Contents of Investigation on Hazardous Facilities 9-62
Location of Investigation on Hazardous Facilities 9-63
Table 10.1.1
Table 10.2.1
Assessment Matrix 10-2

Major Legal Framework of Disaster Management in the Philippine 10-5
Table 11.3.1
Table 11.3.2
Table 11.4.1
Table 11.4.2
Table 11.4.3
Table 11.4.4
Table 11.4.5
Table 11.4.6
Table 11.4.7
Table 11.5.2
Assessment Areas and Their Components 11-2

Organizations to be Studied by Assessment Area 11-3
DOH Budget Allocation by Expense Class, CY1998-2002 11-7
Increasing Budget for Health in Local Government 11-7
Survey on Disaster Control Program at Tertiary Level Hospitals in NCR 11-9
Number and Ratio of LGU Facilities in 2001 11-10
Membership Profile, As of September 30, 2002 11-11
Number of Hospitals by Category in NCR on September 30, 2002 11-11
Distribution of Hospitals and Bed Capacity by Level of Health Care and by City in 2001
11-13
DOH-HEMS Annual Training and Related Activities Plan in 2003 (Abstract) 11-17
DOH-NCRs Campaign and Training Program in 2002 11-17
Summary of the Answers from LGUs about Their Capability for Health Emergency
11-19
Major Concerns of LGUs to Cope with Potential Earthquake Disaster 11-22
Table 12.2.1
Table 12.2.2
Table 12.2.3
Table 12.3.1
Table 12.3.2
Table 12.3.3
Destructive Earthquakes that Affected Metropolitan Manila and Estimated PGA 12-15
Source Zones Surrounding Metropolitan Manila and Estimated PGA 12-19
Fault Model Parameters of Scenario Earthquakes for Hazard Estimation 12-21
Definition of Terminology for Engineering Seismic Bedrock and Subsurface Soil 12-22
Stratigraphical Feature of Soil Deposit 12-25
Data Sources applied for Ground Classification 12-27
Table 11.4.8
Table 11.4.9
Table 11.5.1
-xii-
Final Report
Table 12.3.4
Table 12.3.5
Table 12.3.6
Table 12.3.7
Table 12.6.1
Table 12.6.2
Table 12.6.3
Table 12.6.4
Table 12.7.1
Table 12.7.2
Table 12.7.3
Table 12.7.4
Table 12.7.5
Table 12.7.6
Ground Classification Step 1, Major Classification 12-29

Ground Classification Step 2 and 3, Classification of the Soil Deposit 12-29
Classification of the Rock 12-30
Summary of Geotechnical Properties for Ground Motion Analysis 12-33
Summary of Quaternary Deposits Distribution by City/Municipality 12-55
Summary of Geotechnical Properties for Liquefaction Analysis 12-61
Summary of Type of Ground Motion for Each Scenario Earthquake 12-62
Criterion for Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential 12-63
Summary of Central Plateau Area by City/Municipality 12-67
Two Types of Evaluation Method for Slope Stability 12-69
Evaluation of Slope Stability Based on Average Gradient in 500m Grid 12-70
Evaluation of Slope Stability Based on Safety Factor 12-72
Matrix of Evaluation of Slope in Failure Potential 12-73
Shear Strength of Residual Soils, Weathered Rocks and Related Minerals 12-74
Table 13.1.1
Table 13.2.1
Table 13.3.1
Table 13.3.2
Table 13.3.3
Table 13.3.4
Table 13.3.5
Table 13.3.6
Table 13.3.7
Table 13.4.1
Table 13.4.2
Table 13.5.1
Table 13.5.2
Table 13.6.1
Table 13.6.2
Table 13.6.3
Table 13.6.4
Table 13.6.5
Table 13.6.6
Table 13.6.7
Table 13.7.1
Table 13.7.2
Table 13.7.3
Table 13.7.4
Table 13.7.5
Table 13.7.6
Table 13.7.7
Table 13.8.1
Table 13.8.2
Table 13.8.3
Table 13.9.1
Table 13.9.2
Table 13.9.3
Fault Model Parameters of Scenario Earthquakes for Damage Estimation 13-1

Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale(1956 Version) 13-3
Important Information Items in Census for Building Damage Estimation 13-14
Classification of Buildings in Metropolitan Manila 13-16
Liquefaction Area Ratio in Liquefaction Potential Area 13-26
Definition of Building Damage 13-28
Summary of Building Damage 13-28
Building Damage by LGU 13-29
Summary of Public Facilities Damage 13-37
Definition of Casualty Damage 13-41
Summary of Human Casualty Damage 13-41
Summary of Fire Damage 13-56
Fire Damage by LGU 13-57
Definition of Water Pipeline Damage Estimation 13-62
Summary of Water Pipeline Damage 13-62
Liquefaction Coefficient for Damage Estimation 13-66
Definition of Electric Power Supply Cable Damage Estimation 13-66
Summary of Electric Power Supply Cable Damage 13-66
Definition of Telecommunication Cable Damage Estimation 13-69
Summary of Telecommunication Cable Damage 13-69
Score Chart for Stability Analysis of Bridges/Flyovers 13-73
Definition of Damage Degree of Bridges and Flyovers 13-75
Summary of Bridge Stability Analysis 13-75
Bridges Evaluated as Large or Moderate Probability of Fall-off 13-76
Comparison of Seismic Resistance Evaluation of Bridges 13-79
Comparison of Result of Damage Estimation 13-80
Overall Evaluation in the Study 13-81
Liquefaction Potential of Ports 13-86
Damage to Airports by Earthquake 13-87
Acceleration at Airport by Scenario Earthquake 13-88
Summary of the Existing Report 13-89
Recommendations on the Existing Report 13-89
Population and Number of Households in the Downstream Basin of the Angat Dam
13-91
-xiii-
Table 14.2.1
Table 14.2.2
Table 14.2.3
Table 14.2.4
Table 14.3.1
Summary of Data used in Regional Vulnerability Analysis 14-3

Vulnerability Classification of Flammable Area 14-7
Distance Areas Affected by the Explosions by Hazardous Facility Type 14-8
High Vulnerable Area by Type 14-15
Summary of Data used in Resource and Vulnerability Evaluation 14-21
Table 15.1.1
Table 15.2.1

Table 16.1.1
Table 16.3.1
Table 16.4.1
Table 16.11.1
Assessment Matrix 16-3

Institutional Strengths and Weaknesses 16-15
Member Agencies as Resource Institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Budget and
Management--DBM) 16-18
MMDCC Member Agencies as Resource Institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Education, Culture &
Sports -- DECS) 16-18
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Interior and Local
Government -- DILG) 16-19
MDCC Member Agencies as Resource Institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Health -- DOH) 16-19
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Public Works and
Highways -- DPWH) 16-20
MDCC Member Agencies as Resource Institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Department of Social Welfare and
Development -- DSWD) 16-20
MMDCC Member Agencies as Resource institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Office of Civil Defense -- OCD)
16-21
MMDCC Member Agencies as Resource institutions for Disaster Management and their
impressions of the Functionality of the MMDCC (Philippine National Red Cross -PNRC) 16-21
Proposed Zones for Zonification 16-47
Table 18.4.1
Fire Damage Reduction by Flammable Building Replacement 18-7
Table 19.1.1
Table 19.2.1
Table 19.3.1
Table 19.3.2
Construction Costs for Buildings 19-3

Possibility Effects to Transport Function in Metro Manila 19-11
Effects of Earthquake Damage to Lifelines 19-24
Characteristics of Damage and Recovery for Lifelines 19-25
Table 20.1.1
Table 20.1.2
Table 20.1.3
Table 20.1.4
Table 20.1.5
Table 20.1.6
Table 20.1.7
Fire Incidences in Metropolitan Manila 20-1

Causes of Fire in Metropolitan Manila (1999-2002) 20-2
Fire-extinguishing Resources of Large Petroleum Storage 20-4
Fire-Fighting Resources of BFP 20-5
Operational Condition of Fire Vehicles 20-6
Age of Fire station (FS) and fire sub-stations (FSS) 20-11
Fire Fighting Equipment of Barangays 20-13
Table 21.1.1
Estimated Building Damage & Human Casualties 21-1
Table 16.4.2
Table 16.4.3
Table 16.4.4
Table 16.4.5
Table 16.4.6
Table 16.4.7
Table 16.4.8
-xiv-
Final Report
Table 21.1.2
Table 21.1.3
Table 21.1.4
Table 21.3.1
Table 21.4.1
Table 21.4.2
Table 21.4.3
Table 21.4.4
Table 21.4.5
Table 21.4.6
Table 21.4.7
Table 21.5.1
Table 21.5.2
Table 21.6.1
Table 21.6.2
Summary of Response Capacity Assessment 21-2

Estimation of Hospital Beds Deployable over the Country 21-3
Estimated Human Damages by District by West Valley Fault Model 21-4
List of Important Issues for the Plan 21-10
List of Medical and Health Functions to be Covered by the Plan 21-13
Hospital Bed and Its Ratio to Population in Adjoining Provinces 21-16
Role of Community and Local Health Personnel in Rescue and Relief Activities 21-19
Role of Team at AMP 21-19
Role of Hospitals by Level during the Disaster Period 21-20
Requirements that Disaster Medical Hospitals should Meet 21-21
Epidemic Control and Water Safety Monitoring Team 21-22
Responsible Level by Activity 21-23
Role of Community and Local Health Personnel in Rescue and Relief Activities 21-24
Recommended Mitigation and Preparedness Actions 21-25
List of Projects to Strengthen Capacity 21-27
-xv-
List of Figures
Figure 1.3.1
Figure 1.3.2
Figure 1.3.3
Study Area 1-3

Work Flow of the Study 1-4
Study Organization 1-5
Figure 2.1.1
Figure 2.1.2
Figure 2.1.3
Figure 2.1.4
Figure 2.1.5
Figure 2.1.6
Figure 2.1.7
Figure 2.3.1
Figure 2.3.2
Figure 2.3.3
Figure 2.3.4
Geological Faults in the Philippines 2-1

Subducting Plates under Luzon Island 2-2
Distribution of Faults and Trenches around Metropolitan Manila 2-3
Distribution of Historical Earthquakes from 1608 to 1895 2-4
Distribution of Instrumentally Recorded Earthquakes from 1907 to 2002 2-5
Scenario Earthquake Fault Models for Hazard Estimation 2-6
Distribution of Seismic Intensity in PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale 2-9
Flow of the Regional Vulnerability Evaluation 2-17
Comprehensive Regional Vulnerability 2-20
Regional Vulnerability Characteristics 2-20
Possible Regional Separation by Earthquake Impact 2-21
Figure 3.1.1
Structure of the Disaster Management Plan for Metropolitan Manila 3-2
Figure 7.1.1
Damages of Natural Disaster in the Philippines from 1990 to 2001 7-4
Figure 8.1.1
Figure 8.1.2
Figure 8.1.3
Figure 8.1.4
Figure 8.3.1
Figure 8.3.2
Figure 8.3.3
Figure 8.4.1
Figure 8.4.2
Figure 8.4.3
Figure 8.6.1
Figure 8.6.2
Figure 8.6.3
Figure 8.6.4
Figure 8.6.5
Figure 8.6.6
Expansion of Urban Land 8-3

Metropolitan Manilas Land Use of 1986 (partly updated in 1996) 8-6
Existing Land Use Map (Compiled in 2003) 8-7
Population Density Distribution by Barangay (persons/ha) 8-9
Population Growth of National and Metropolitan Manila 8-18
Population Growth Ratio of National and Metropolitan Manila 8-19
Population Density of Cities and Municipalities in Metropolitan Manila 8-19
Example of Community Boundary in a Barangay 8-31
Information Channels and Methods between Barangay and Community Leaders 8-32
An Example of Barangay where Community Boundaries are not Aware 8-32
Sequence of Activities 8-36
Progression of Vulnerability 8-44
Flow of the Survey and GIS Database Development 8-47
Detailed Building and Infrastructure Survey Mataas na Lupa, Malate, Manila City 8-49
Detailed Building and Infrastructure Survey, Cupang, Muntinlupa City 8-51
Detailed Building and Infrastructure Survey, Ugong, Pasig City 8-53
Figure 9.1.1
Figure 9.1.2
Figure 9.1.3
Figure 9.1.4
Figure 9.1.5
Figure 9.1.6
Figure 9.1.7
Figure 9.1.8
Figure 9.1.9
Figure 9.1.10
Number of Buildings per Barangay 9-3

Building Density per Barangay 9-4
Concrete-Walled Buildings per Barangay (2000) 9-9
Wood-Walled Buildings per Barangay (2000) 9-10
Half Concrete-Walled Buildings per Barangay (2000) 9-11
Buildings Built in Year 1960 or Earlier per Barangay (2000) 9-13
Building Built in Year 1961-1970 per Barangay (2000) 9-14
Building Built in Year 1971 1980 per Barangay (2000) 9-15
-xvi-
Final Report
Figure 9.1.11
Figure 9.1.12
Figure 9.1.13
Figure 9.1.14
Figure 9.1.15
Figure 9.1.16
Figure 9.1.17
Figure 9.2.1
Figure 9.2.2
Figure 9.2.3
Figure 9.2.4
Figure 9.2.5
Figure 9.2.6
Figure 9.2.7
Figure 9.2.8
Figure 9.2.9
Figure 9.2.10
Figure 9.2.11
Figure 9.2.12
Figure 9.2.13
Figure 9.4.1
Figure 9.4.2
Location Map of Police Station 9-21

Location Map of Fire Fighting Station 9-22
Location Map of Hospitals 9-23
Location Map of Public Schools and Private Schools 9-24
Location Map of 17 LGU City and Municipality Hall, MMDCC Departments and
Agencies 9-25
Organization Chart of DPWH 9-30
Results of Building Diagnosis for Public Building 9-33
Road Network 9-39
Bridge Distribution in Metropolitan Manila 9-42
Port Facilities of Metropolitan Manila 9-45
Existing Plan of North Harbor, Port of Manila 9-46
Existing Plan of MICT, Port of Manila 9-47
Existing Plan of International Container Terminal, Port of Manila 9-48
Geological Map around the Angat Dam and Water Transmission Pipes 9-50
Plan of the Angat Dam and the Dike 9-51
MWSS Headworks Schematic Diagram 9-52
Plane of the Angat Dam 9-53
Cross Section of the Angat Dam 9-53
Plan of the Dike 9-54
Cross Section of the Dike 9-55
Location Map of Fire/Explosion Material treatment facilities, Gasoline Stations 9-60
Location Map of Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities, Hazardous Waste Generating
Facilities, Hazardous Stock - Radioactive Material 9-61
Figure 10.3.1
Figure 10.3.2
Figure 10.3.3
Figure 10.3.4
Organizational Chart of National Disaster Coordinating Council (1) 10-8

Organizational Chart of National Disaster Coordinating Council (2) 10-9
Organizational Chart, Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordinating Council 10-9
Typical Organization of Barangay Disaster Coordinating Councils 10-17
Figure 11.4.1
Figure 11.4.2
Figure 11.4.3
Figure 11.4.4
Figure 11.4.5
Organizational Spectrum in Emergency Health Service 11-5

Organization Chart of Stop DEATH Program 11-8
Allocation of Major Hospitals with 200 Beds and More 11-14
Ratio of Bed Capacity to 1000 Population by City/Municipal 11-15
Metropolitan Manila Zoning System by Stop DEATH Program 11-16
Figure 12.1.1
Figure 12.1.2
Figure 12.1.3
Figure 12.1.4
Figure 12.1.5
Figure 12.1.6
Geological Fault in the Philippines 12-1

Geomorphological Map of the Study Area 12-3
Elevation Map of the Study Area 12-4
Slope Gradient Map of the Study Area 12-5
Geological Map of the Study Area 12-7
PGA maps with 10% Probability of Exceedance in a) 50 year, b) 100 year and c) 250 year
exposure time. 12-10
Subducting Plates under Luzon Island 12-11
Distribution of Faults and Trenches around Metropolitan Manila 12-12
Distribution of Historical Earthquakes from 1608 to 1895 12-16
Distribution of Instrumentally Recorded Earthquakes from 1907 to 2002 12-17
Scenario Earthquake Fault Models for Hazard Estimation 12-20
Schematic Diagram of Distribution of the Rock 12-23
Thickness of Deposit of Soil Based on Model 12-24
Figure 12.2.1
Figure 12.2.2
Figure 12.2.3
Figure 12.2.4
Figure 12.2.5
Figure 12.3.1
Figure 12.3.2
-xvii-
Figure 12.3.3
Figure 12.3.4
Figure 12.3.5
Figure 12.3.6
Figure 12.3.7
Figure 12.3.8
Figure 12.3.9
Figure 12.3.10
Figure 12.3.11
Figure 12.4.1
Figure 12.4.2
Figure 12.4.3
Figure 12.4.4
Figure 12.4.5
Figure 12.4.6
Figure 12.4.7
Figure 12.4.8
Figure 12.4.9
Figure 12.4.10
Figure 12.4.11
Figure 12.5.1
Figure 12.5.2
Figure 12.6.1
Figure 12.6.2
Figure 12.6.3
Figure 12.6.4
Figure 12.6.5
Figure 12.6.6
Figure 12.7.6
Distribution of Predominant Period Based on Existing Microtremor Measurement 12-24

Four Regional Classification of Lowland Area 12-26
Flowchart for Ground Modeling for Seismic Motion Analysis 12-27
Location of Investigation Drilling 12-28
Relationship between N Value and Shear Wave Velocity 12-31
Non-Linear Stress-Strain Characteristics of Soil 12-32
Ground Model Distribution at Ground Surface 12-34
Model Cross Section: North-South Direction 12-35
Model Cross Section: East-West Direction 12-36
Schematic figure of seismic wave propagation and amplification 12-38
Flowchart of Earthquake ground motion analysis 12-38
Adopted Attenuation Formula for Acceleration 12-40
Adopted Attenuation Formula for Velocity 12-40
Adopted Attenuation Formula for Acceleration Response Spectrum 12-41
Amplification from Strong Motion and Response Analysis 12-42
Simulated Acceleration distribution of December 12, 1999 Earthquake 12-44
Simulated Seismic Intensity in MMI Scale of August 1, 1968 Earthquake 12-44
Distribution of Peak Ground Acceleration 12-46
Distribution of Peak Ground Velocity 12-47
Distribution of Seismic Intensity in MMI Scale 12-48
Observed and estimated run-up height of 1976Mindanao Earthquake 12-52
Observed and estimated run-up height of 1994 Mindoro Earthquake 12-53
Flowchart of Liquefaction Analysis 12-57
Variation of Soil Properties, D50, D10 and Fc, for Each Ground Classification 12-60
Variation of Soil Properties, PI, for Each Ground Classification 12-61
Observed Groundwater Level in the Study 12-62
Results of Liquefaction Analysis for Each Scenario Earthquake 12-64
Variation of Liquefaction Potential in Each City/Municipality, Case of Scenario
Earthquake Model 08 12-64
Liquefaction Potential Map 12-65
Flowchart of Slope Stability Analysis 12-69
A Typical Section of Slope 12-71
Relationship Between Slope Gradient, Seismic Coefficient and Minimum Shear Strength
Stability Number 12-72
Results of Slope Stability Analysis for Each Scenario Earthquake 12-75
Variation of Slope in Failure Potential in Each City/Municipality Area, Case of Scenario
Earthquake Model 08 12-75
Slope in Failure Potential Map 12-76
Figure 13.1.1
Figure 13.2.1
Figure 13.2.2
Figure 13.2.3
Figure 13.2.4
Figure 13.2.5
Figure 13.2.6
Figure 13.2.7
Figure 13.2.8
Figure 13.2.9
Figure 13.3.1
Scenario Earthquake Fault Model for Damage Estimation 13-2

Distribution of Peak Ground Acceleration: Model 08 13-4
Distribution of Seismic Intensity in MMI Scale: Model 08 13-7
Liquefaction Potential Map: Model 08 13-10
Flowchart of Building Damage Estimation 13-13
Figure 12.6.7
Figure 12.7.1
Figure 12.7.2
Figure 12.7.3
Figure 12.7.4
Figure 12.7.5
-xviii-
Final Report
Figure 13.5.1
Figure 13.5.2
Figure 13.5.3
Figure 13.5.4
Figure 13.5.5
Figure 13.5.6
Figure 13.5.7
Figure 13.6.1
Figure 13.6.2
Figure 13.6.3
Figure 13.6.4
Figure 13.6.5
Figure 13.6.6
Figure 13.6.7
Figure 13.6.8
Figure 13.7.1
Figure 13.7.2
Figure 13.8.1
Figure 13.9.1
Classified Building Distribution - CBB + CBA - 13-18

Classified Building Distribution - CWB + CWA - 13-19
Classified Building Distribution - WB + WA 13-20
Classified Building Distribution - S - 13-21
Distribution of Totally + Partly Damaged Buildings by 1990 Luzon Earthquake 13-23
Seismic Intensity in by 1990 Luzon Earthquake 13-23
Example of Estimated Damage Function for 1990 Luzon Earthquake 13-25
Heavily Damage Function for Metropolitan Manila 13-25
Partly Damage Function for Metropolitan Manila 13-26
Number of Heavily Damaged Buildings : Model 08 13-30
Ratio of Heavily Damaged Buildings : Model 08 13-33
Flowchart of Human Casualty Damage Estimation 13-38
Damage Function for Death Estimation 13-40
Damage Function for Injured Estimation 13-40
Number of Dead People : Model 08 13-42
Death Ratio : Model 08 13-45
Relationship between total casualty figures and total building damages statistics
(Retouched to Coburn and Spence 1992) 13-49
Number of Fire Outbreaks from 1995 to 2002 13-50
Origin of Fire from 1995 to 2002 13-51
Relation between Fire Outbreaks and Building Damage by Kobe Earthquake 13-53
Relation between Burnt Area Ratio and Flammable Area Ratio 13-54
Possible Area of Fire Spreading 13-55
Maximum Burnt Buildings by Fire : Wind Speed 3m/sec 13-58
Maximum Burnt Buildings by Fire : Wind Speed 8m/sec 13-59
Damage Function of Water Supply Pipeline 13-61
Distribution of Water Pipe Damage : Model 08 13-63
Distribution of Water Pipe Damage : Model 18 13-64
Damage Function of Electric Power Supply Cable 13-65
Distribution of Electricity Cable Damage : Model 08 13-67
Distribution of Electricity Cable Damage : Model 18 13-68
Distribution of Telecommunication Cable Damage : Model 08 13-70
Distribution of Telecommunication Cable Damage : Model 18 13-71
Flowchart of Stability Analysis of bridges/flyovers 13-73
Result of Bridges and Flyovers Stability Analysis 13-77
Damage Grade to Airport and PGA 13-88
Location of the Angat Dam and West Valley Fault System 13-90
Figure 14.2.1
Figure 14.2.4
Figure 14.2.7
Figure 14.2.12
Flow of the Regional Vulnerability Evaluation 14-2

Building Collapse 14-6
Flammability 14-10
Possible Regional Separation by Earthquake Impact 14-18
Figure 13.3.2
Figure 13.3.3
Figure 13.3.4
Figure 13.3.5
Figure 13.3.6
Figure 13.3.7
Figure 13.3.8
Figure 13.3.9
Figure 13.3.10
Figure 13.3.11
Figure 13.3.12
Figure 13.3.13
Figure 13.3.14
Figure 13.3.15
Figure 13.3.16
Figure 13.4.1
Figure 13.4.2
Figure 13.4.3
Figure 13.4.4
Figure 13.4.5
Figure 13.4.6
Figure 13.4.7
Figure 13.4.8
Figure 13.4.9
Figure 13.4.10
-xix-
Figure 14.3.1
Flow of the Resource and Vulnerability Evaluation 14-20
Figure 16.3.1
Figure 16.3.2
Figure 16.6.1
Figure 16.11.1
Organizational Chart of Institutional Arrangements 16-14

Organizational Chart of a City Disaster Coordinating Council, Marikina Disaster
Coordinating Council 16-17
Organizational Chart of a Municipal Disaster Coordinating Council, Navotas Disaster
Coordinating Council 16-17
Organizational Charts of Two Typical Barangay Disaster Coordinating Councils 16-26
Proposed Zonification 16-48
Figure 17.1.1
General Workflow 17-2
Figure 18.4.1
Figure 18.4.2
Fire Damage Mitigation by Flammable Building Replacement 18-8

A Concept of Urban Re-development 18-9
Figure 19.1.1
Figure 19.1.2
Figure 19.1.3
Figure 19.1.4
Figure 19.1.5
Figure 19.2.1
Figure 19.2.2
Figure 19.2.3
Figure 19.2.4
Figure 19.2.5
Figure 19.2.6
Figure 19.2.7
Figure 19.2.8
Figure 19.2.9
Figure 19.2.10
Figure 19.2.11
Proposal for Retrofitting Techniques 19-2

Methods for Improvement of Structural Member 19-4
Various Methods for Retrofitting of Building Structures 19-5
Institutionalization for Qualified Building Design and Construction 19-7
Improved detail of Masonry Wall and Adjacent Columns 19-8
Characteristics of Road Damage Against Earthquake 19-10
Relationship between Road Damage and Ground Acceleration 19-11
Type of Strengthening Method for Bridge Structure 19-13
Typical Samples of Falling-off Prevention System 19-14
Explanation of the Effect at Each Stage of the Earthquake Intensity 19-15
An Example of Displacement Controlling by Damper 19-16
An Example of Seismic Isolation Device (Lead Rubber Bearing) 19-16
Behavior of Seismic Isolation Device 19-17
Example of RC Jacketing Method 19-18
Example of Steel Jacketing Method 19-18
Example of Fiber Jacketing Method 19-18
Figure 20.1.1
Figure 20.1.2
Figure 20.1.3
Figure 20.1.4
Figure 20.1.5
BFP Organization Structure 20-7

Regional Fire Organizational Structure 20-7
Regional Operational Units 20-8
Organizational Structure of City and Municipality Fire Stations 20-8
Organization of Barangay Disaster Coordination Council 20-10
Figure 21.1.1
Direction to Evacuate the Injured to Less Affected Area by Earthquake Damaged Zone
21-6
Three-level Structure of Disaster Coordinating Council 21-7
Proposed Organizational Set-up for Health Command and Coordination 21-14
Proposed Rescue & Relief Operation Zoning 21-17
Principle Structure of Medical Relief in the Zone 21-18
Figure 16.3.3
Figure 21.2.1
Figure 21.4.1
Figure 21.4.2
Figure 21.4.3
-xx-
Final Report
Abbreviations and Acronyms
AASHTO
ABC
ACP
ADB
ADOC
AMMS
AMP
ASEP
ATC
ATI
BAC
BDCC
BFP
BOC
BOD
BOE
BOM
BRS
C/GP
CAR
CBD
CBDM
CBO
CDCC
CDMC
CDPP
CFMS
CFS
CH
CHB
CHED
CHO
CLUP
CMP
COA
CSSR
DAO
DBM
DCC
DECS
DENR
DEO
DIG
DILG
DMCC
DMH
DND
DOC
DOCCP
DOH
DOTC
DPD
DPOS
DPWH
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official

Associate of Barangay Captains
Advance Command Post
Asian Development Bank
Advance Disaster Operations Center
Administrative & Manpower Management Service
Advanced Medical Post
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines
Applied Technical Council
Asia Terminal Incorporated
Bids and Awards Committee
Barangay Disaster Coordination Council
Bureau of Fire Protection
Bureau of Construction
Bureau of Design
Bureau of Equipment
Bureau of maintenance
Bureau of Research and Standards
Clean/Green Personnel
Cordillera Administrative Region
Central Business District
Community-Based Disaster Management
Community Based Organization
City Disaster Coordination Council
Core Disaster Medical Center
Calamities & Disaster Preparedness Plan
Comptrollership & Financial Management Service
City Fire Station
City Hall
Concrete Hollow Brick
Commission on Higher Education
City Health Officers
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Community Mortgage Plan
Commission on Audit
Collapsed Structure Search and Rescue
Disaster Action Officer
Department of Budget & Management
Disaster Coordination Council
Department of Education, Culture & Sports
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
District Engineering Office
Disaster Imagination Game
Department of Interior and Local Government
Disaster Management Coordinating Council
Disaster Medical Hospitals
Department of National Defense
Disaster Operations Center
Disaster Center Command Post
Department of Health
Department of Transportation and Communications
Division of Preventable Disease
Department of Public Order and Safety
Department of Public Works and Highways
-xxi-
DSO
DSWD
DepEd
ED
EDM
EMB
EMI
EMIP
EMS
EMSA
EMT
ESC
EVF
FD
FEMA
FS
FT
GDP
GESI
GIS
GMR
GOJ
GOP
GPS
HEMS
HLURB
HUDCC
ICS
ICTSI
ICU
IEC
IRA
JICA
JMAI
KI
LCE
LDCC
LGC
LGU
LHP
LLO
LPG
LRT
LWUA
MAYERT
MCDCC
MDCC
MEC
MERALCO
MERG
MFS
MICT
MIS
MMA
MMDA
MMDCC
MMDOC
MMEIRS
Directorate for Special Operation

Department of Social Welfare and Development
Department of Education
Engineering Department
Earthquake Disaster Management
Environmental Management Bureau
Earthquake and Megacities Initiative
Emergency Management Institute of the Philippines
Emergency Medical Service (or System)
Emergency Medical Services Authority
Emergency Medical Treatment
Environmental Sanitation Center
East Valley Fault
Fire Department
Federal Emergency Management Agency; The United States of America
Fire station
Fire Truck
Gross Domestic Product
Global Earthquake Safety Initiative
Geographic Information System
Greater Manila Region
Government of Japan
Government of Republic of the Philippines
Global Positioning System
Health Emergency Management Staff
Housing and Land use Regulatory Board
Housing and Urban Development Coordination Council
Incident Command System
International Container Terminal Services, Inc
Intensive Care Unit
Information and Education Campaign
Internal Revenue Allotment
Japan Methodological Agency Intensity
Key Informants
Local Chief Executives
Local Disaster Coordinating Committee
Local Government Code
Local Government Unit
Local Health Personnel
Legislative Liaison Office
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Light Rail Transit
Local Water Utilities Administration
Makati Youth Emergency Rescue Unit
Makati City Disaster Coordinating Council
Municipal Disaster Coordination Council
Ministry of Education and Culture
Manila Electric Company
Manila Emergency Response Group
Municipality Fire Station
Manila International Container Terminal
Monitoring and Information
Metro Manila Authority
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority
Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordinating Council
Metro Manila Disaster Operations Center
Metropolitan Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study
-xxii-
Final Report
MMI
MMUTIS
MOA
MRT
MRTC
MSSD
MSW
MWSS
NAIA
NAMRIA
NAPOCOR
NBCP
NCDA
NCR
NCRPO
NDCC
NDMC
NEMA
NGO
NHA
NHMFC
NPC
NS
NSCB
NSCP
NSO
NTC
OCD
OPCEN
PAGASA
PAHO
PD
PEAC
PEIS
PERR
PFZ
PGA
PGV
PHA
PHIVOLCS
PICE
PIO
PLDT
PNCC
PNP
PNRC
PPA
PTSD
RA
RB
RC
RCDG
RES
ROD
RQD
RROZ
RS
RVS
Modified Mercalli Intensity

Metropolitan Manila Urban Transportation Integration Study (JICA)
Memorandum of Agreement
Metro Rail Transit
Metropolitan Manila Transit Corporation
Ministry of Social Services and Development
Marine Slipway
Manila Waterworks and Sewerage System
Ninoy Aquino International Airport
National Mapping and Resource Information NAMRIA
National Power Corporation
National Building Code of the Philippines
National Civil Defense Administration
National Capital Region
National Capital Regional Police Office
National Disaster Coordinating Council
National Disaster Management Center
National Emergency Management Association
Non-Governmental Organization
National Housing Authority
National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation
National Power Corporation
Nurse Supervisor
National Structure Code for Buildings
National Structural Code of Philippines
National Statistics Office
National Telecommunications Commission
Office of Civil Defense
Operation center
Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration
Pan American Health Organization
Presidential Decree
Pre-Qualification, Evaluation and Awards Committee for Consultancy
PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale
Philippine Earthquake Reconnaissance Report
Philippine Fault Zone
Peak Ground Acceleration
Peak Ground Velocity
Philippine Hospital Association
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology
Philippine Institute of Civil Engineering
Public Information Officer
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company
Philippine National Construction Corporation
Philippine National Police
Philippine National Red Cross
Philippine Ports Authority
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Republic Act
Road Board
Reinforced Concrete
Reinforced Concrete Deck Girder
Regional Equipment Services
Regional Operations Division
Rock Quality Designation
Rescue & Relief Operation Zones
Resident Survey
Rapid Visual Screening
-xxiii-
S.W.M.O
SARS
SEAOC
SFS
SO
SOP
SPT
SS
SUMA
SWD
TOT
UBC
UHLP
UNHCR
UN-OCHA
USGS
UTM
VCA
VFS
WB
WHO
WVF
WVFS
Solid Waste Management Office

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Structural Engineers Association of California
Sub Fire Stations
Surveillance Officer and RSI
Standard Operating Procedure
Standard Penetration Tests
Strike Slip
Supply Management Methodology
Solid Waste Department
Training of Trainers
Uniform Building Code
Unified Home Lending Pregram
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
U.S. Geological Survey
Universal Transverse Mercator Projection
Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment
Valley Fault System
World Bank
World Health Organization
West Valley Fault
West Valley Fault System
-xxiv-
Main Report 1
Part I
Outline of the Study
Chapter 1.
General
Final Report
CHAPTER 1.
1.1
GENERAL
Introduction
In response to the request of the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter
referred to as GOP), the Government of Japan (hereinafter referred to as GOJ) decided to
conduct the Study for Earthquake Impact Reduction for Metropolitan Manila in the Republic of
the Philippines (hereinafter referred to as the Study or by the acronym MMEIRS for short).
The Japan International Cooperation Agency (hereinafter referred to as JICA), the official
agency responsible for the implementation of technical cooperation programs of GOJ, undertook
the Study in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations in force in Japan.
On the part of GOP, the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (hereinafter referred
MMDA) and the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (hereinafter referred
PHIVOLCS), acted as the counterpart agencies to the Japanese Study Team (hereinafter
referred the Team) and also as the coordinating bodies in relation with other governmental and
non-governmental organizations concerned with the smooth implementation of the Study.
This Final Report is compiled to summarize all the Study contents.
1.2
Background of the Study

Metropolitan Manila, which is composed of 13 cities and 4 municipalities, is the political,
economic, and cultural center of the Philippines. The population of Metropolitan Manila is
approximately 10 million at present. It has been developing and is now one of the most densely
populated areas in Southeast Asia. Rapid population growth started in the 1970s, when the
population was approximately 4 million. It increased to 6 million in the 1980s, 8 million in the
1990s and 10 million at present. The population has increased by 2.5 times in the last 30 years.
Additionally, this rapid population growth is affecting the fringe areas of Metropolitan Manila,
and the population is expected to grow to 25 million by the year 2015 based on the estimate of
another JICA Study.
Rapid urbanization usually occurs without satisfactory infrastructure construction.
This
condition often results in the poor housing condition, highly dense areas, and areas characterized
by mixed land use and other inappropriate conditions. Thus, the potential for natural disaster
increases and the reduction of vulnerability to disasters is a pressing issue for the safety of
residents.
Geographically, Metropolitan Manila is located in Luzon Island.
Numerous earthquake
generators, such as the Valley Fault System (VFS), Philippine Fault, Lubang Fault, Manila Trench,
and Casiguran Fault, are located in and around it. Among these faults, the Valley Fault System,
-1-1-
which transects the study area, is considered to potentially cause the largest impact to the
Metropolitan Manila area should it generate a large maximum earthquake.
Topographically, the Metropolitan Manila area is composed of coastal lowlands, a central plateau
where the central district including Makati is located, as well as alluvial lowlands along the
Marikina River and the Laguna Lake. In case of an earthquake, liquefaction in these lowland
areas may cause damage to buildings and infrastructure. In addition, tsunami can also occur
along the Manila Bay.
Recent studies show that the West Valley Fault has moved at least 4 times and generated strong
earthquakes within the last 1,400 years. The approximate return period of these earthquakes is
less than 500 years and no event along the West Valley Fault is known after 17th century. This
means that the active phases of the Valley Fault is approaching. Many research studies indicate
that the estimated magnitude will be around 7 or more.
In order to manage the potential earthquake disaster in Metropolitan Manila, it is necessary to
prepare an earthquake disaster mitigation plan, and to start actions as soon as possible. The
disaster management plan will be focused on raising awareness of concerned organizations,
employing a comprehensive disaster management approach, and strengthening vertical synergetic
networks from the central government to local governments to communities.
Therefore, GOP requested GOJ to conduct this Study as a technical cooperation program. JICA,
as the official implementation agency of this Study, sent a Team to the Philippines in middle of
August 2000 to commence the project.
1.3
Scope of the Study
1.3.1
Study Objectives
The objectives of the Study were :
1) To formulate a master plan for earthquake impact reduction for Metropolitan Manila in the
Republic of the Philippines.
2) To carry out technology transfer to Philippine counterpart personnel, of MMDA and
PHIVOLCS, in the course of the Study.
1.3.2
Study Area
The Study area covered the entire Metropolitan Manila, with an area of 636 km2 (Figure 1.3.1).
-1-2-
Final Report
Figure 1.3.1
Study Area
-1-3-
1.3.3
Schedule of the Study

The Study consisted of a variety of tasks. Figure 1.3.2 shows the work schedule of, and
interrelations among the tasks, and shows the logical flow of the Study.
Year
Work Flow
Month
Aug.
1. Explanation and Discussion of Inception Report
Sep.
2002
Oct.
2. Workshop(1)
5. Primary Field Survey

4. Existing
Data
Collection
and
Evaluation
10. Geological
and Geophysical
Investigation
6. Evaluation of Urban Vulnerable Factors

and those Backgrounds
Nov.
Dec.
13. Preparation of Progress Report (1)
14.Ground
Condition
Analysis and
Modeling
15. Survey
and Inventory
Compilation
on Buildings
16. Survey and

Inventory
Compilation on
Infrastructures
and Lifelines
Feb.
Report
WS 1
IC/R
8. Compilation of
Existing 1:10,000
Scale Topographic
Maps
12. Discussion
& Determination
of Scenario
Earthquake
7. Survey on Social Condition of

Communities
Jan.
3. Development and Management of web

site
Seminar/
Workshop
9. Production of
1:5,000 Scale
Topographical Maps
17.Survey and
Inventory
Compilation on
Important Public
Facilities and
Dangerous Material
Treatment Facilities
PR/R1
11. GIS
Database
Development
18. Analysis
of Earthquake
Ground Motion
19.Evaluation and Compilation of Hazard Maps and Urban Vulnerability Maps
Mar.
20. Preparation of Interim Report
IT/R
Apr.
May
Jun.
2003
21. Explanation and Discussion of Interim Report
23. Earthquake
Damage Estimation
and Damage Map
Compilation
22. Workshop 2
WS 2
24. Preparation of
Damage Scenario
25. Preparation of Disaster
Management Plan
Jul.
Aug.
26. Community based Disaster

Management Plan (Step1)
27. Preparation of Progress Report (2)
PR/R2
Sep.
Oct.
28. Community based Disaster Management Plan (Step 2)
29. Preparation of Posters for

Disaster Preparedness
Nov.
30. Preparation of Draft Final Report
Dec.
Jan.
2004
31. Explanation and discussion of Draft Final Report
DF/R
32. Seminar
Seminar
Feb.
33. Compilation of Final Report
Mar.
F/R
Work in Japan
Figure 1.3.2
Work Flow of the Study
-1-4-
Final Report
1.3.4
Implementing Organizations
The Study was carried out through the joint efforts of the JICA Study Team and Filipino
counterpart personnel, who formed a study implementing body. The JICA Study Team was
comprised of members from Pacific Consultants International (PCI), OYO International
Corporation (OYO) and Pasco Corporation (PASCO). The Filipino counterparts were delegated
from the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) and Philippine Institute of
Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS), Department of Science and Technology.
In the Philippines, many agencies including governmental organizations, universities and
research institutes have been conducting seismic research and disaster management activities.
These agencies have accumulated a great amount of research data, information and reports on
earthquakes of the Philippines. The valuable information, opinions and experiences of different
agencies on earthquakes in the Philippines should be well integrated into the JICA Study.
Information on existing urban conditions and future urban development in Manila is another
significant data for the estimation of seismic damage. Therefore, a Steering and Technical
Committee, composed of representatives from organizations involved in seismic research, and
urban planning were organized to participate in MMEIRS to guide and advise on the directions
and policy-related matters relating to the project.
Figure 1.3.3 shows the Study Organization. Table 1.3.1 to Table 1.3.4shows the members of the
Study Team, the Steering Committee, the Technical Committee, and the Counterparts,
respectively.
Government of Japan
Steering Committee
JICA
Government of the Philippines

Technical Committee
Study Implementing Body

MMDA
JICA Study Team
PHIVOLCS
Figure 1.3.3
Study Organization
-1-5-
Advisory Committee
Table 1.3.1
Members of the Study Team and Assignments to be covered
JICA Advisory Committee

Mr. Masayuki Watanabe
Leader/
Disaster
Management Planning
Senior Advisor, JICA Institute for International

Cooperation
Dr. Mitsumasa Midorikawa
Earthquake-resistance
Assessment
Research Coordinator, Building Research Institute,

Independent Administrative Institution
Mr. Ryohei Miura
Urban Disaster Management
Construction Management Division, Research

Center for Land and Construction Management,
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure
Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and
Transport
(April 2003-)
Mr. Hitoshi Nishino
(August 2002 March 2003)
Study Team
Mr. Noboru Ikenishi
Team Leader/ Disaster Management Planning
Mr. Yutaka Koike
Deputy Team Leader/Geotechnical Engineering, Earthquake Disaster Management
Mr. Shukyo Segawa
Earthquake and Tsunami Engineering
Mr. Nobuhiko Toyama
Geological and Geophysical Survey
Dr. Tsunehisa Tsugawa
Building Engineering, Seismic Code
Mr. Ryoji Takahashi
Lifeline Engineering
Mr. Ryo Miyazaki
Infrastructure Engineering
Mr. Haruhiko Imai
Urban Planning
Mr. Hideyuki Sasaki
Regional Disaster Planning
Mr. Takeshi Morita
Fire Prevention, Dangerous Material Treatment
Ms. Tomoko Shaw
Community based Disaster Management
Ms. Shirley Mattingly
Institution and Organization 1
Dr. Gaudioso C. Sosmea Jr.
Institution and Organization 2
Mr. Kazumi Akita
Disaster Relief, Medical Treatment
Mr. Yutaka Kokufu
Topographical Mapping
Mr. Joel Ferrer Cruz
GIS Development/ Disaster Information System
Ms. Kanako Iuchi
Urban-social Survey/ Project Administrator
JICA Tokyo Headquarters

Mr. Itsu Adachi
(April 2003-)
Mr. Senichi Kimura
(August 2002 March 2003)
Mr. Masafumi Nagaishi
(December 2003 - )
Mr. Akio Kagawa
(August 2002 November 2003)
Mr. Hiroshi Fujimoto
(December 2003 - )
Dr. Hisashi Suzuki
(August 2002 November 2003)
Director
Director, Second Study Division,

Social Development Study Department
Deputy Director
Deputy Director, Second Study Division,

Staff
Staff, Second Study Division,

JICA Expert
Sr. Urban Development Advisor
JICA Expert, MMDA

Mr. Yoshio Tanaka
-1-6-
Final Report
Table 1.3.2
Ms. Corazon Bautista-Cruz, EnP
(September 2002- )
Mr. Rogelio U. Uranza
(August 2002 September 2002)
Dr. Renato U. Solidum, Jr.
(December 2002- )
Dr. Raymundo Punongbayan
(August 2002 December 2002)
Mr. Arnel C. Capili
Dir. Emmy B. Reyes
Engr. Liberato L. Requioma, Jr.
Engr. Ildefonso T. Patdu Jr.
(April 2003-present)
Engr. Samuel C. Custodio
(August 2002 April 2003)
Engr. Alvin T. Claridades
Dr. Edmundo B. Lopez, MD., MPH.
Ms. Dominica P. Godinez
Mr. Rizalino Jose P. Rosales
Mr. Elmer H. Dorado
Dr. Johnny O. Aguino, Jr.
Sr. Supt. Danilo R. Cabrera
Dir. Corazon C. Davis
Table 1.3.3
PHIVOLCS
MMDA
ASEP
BAYANTEL
CHED
DepED
DPWH
DOTC
HUDCC
HLURB
Members of the Steering Committee

MMDA
MMDA AGM for Planning, Chair

Ex-Chairman / AGM for Operation
PHIVOLCS
Director, Co-Chair
Ex-Co-Chairman / Director

Presidential Management Staff
Department of Public Works & Highways
(DPWH)
Department
of
Transportation
and
Communications
Regional Director
Director, Admin Mgt Office
Engineer III
Director, Transport Planning Service
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Coordination Council (HUDCC)
Department of Health (DOH)
Department of Social Welfare and
Development
Department of Education
National Economic and Development
Authority
Department of Interior and Local Government
(DILG)
Bureau of Fire Protection NCR
Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
PEO IV
Social Welfare Officer

Admin Office V, DepEd NCR
Division Chief, Social Infra. Dev.
NCR Asst Regional Director
Fire Marshall, NCR
NCR Regional Director
Members of the Technical Committee

Director; Chairperson TWC
Dr. Renato U. Solidum, Jr.

(December 2002- )
Dr. Raymundo Punongbayan
(August 2002 December 2002)
Dir. Ramon J. Santiago
Engr. Ronaldo S. Ison
Dr. Benito Pacheco
Mr. Rene Mababangloob
Ex- Chairperson TWC

Co-Chair, TWC
President, ASEP
Past President
Asst. Manager, Site & Construction
Property & Facilities Department
Director
Education Program Specialist II
Chief, Structural Division, Bureau of Design
Sr. Transportations Development Officer
Director
Dr. Jean C. Tayag

Mr. Ernesto T. Salita
Engr. Wilfredo S. Lopez
Engr. Samuel C. Custodio
Engr. Ferdinando I. Caberto
Ronald G. Fontamilla
Engr. Alvin Claridades
Roque Arrieta Magno
Engr. Julius Tan (alternate)
Commissioner
Continued to next page
-1-7-
Table 1.3.3
MWSS
Manila Water
MAYNILAD
Engr. Jose Alfredo Escoto, Jr.

Selwyn Cabaluna
Anita Calderero
Vilma Cembrano
MAYNILAD
Pedro F. Co
Nestor P. Sarmiento
Engr. Ofelia Castro
Engr. Victor Balba
Engr. Arlyn Puzon (Alternate)
Mr. Cirilo Q. Sebandal
NAMRIA
NHA
NPC
TUP-College
Engineering
UPEngineering
UP-Dept.
Geography
Globe
Smart
Digitel
DOH
DSWD
TRANSCO
BFP
DILG
NCTS
PNRC
Dept. Manager, Pumping Plant Section

Head, Environmental Assessment
Acting Head, Environmental Compliance,
Management Department
Head, Environmental Assessment
Acting Head, Environmental Compliance,
Management Department
System Control Center
Anita Calderero
Vilma Cembrano
MERALCO
NTC
OCD
PICE
PLDT
PUP-College
Engineering
Members of the Technical Committee (continued)
of
of
Civil
of
Environment
Environment
Chief, Photogrammetry Division

OIC, Housing Technology Office
Head, CE & Architecture & Drafting Sercices, Devt & Design Grp,
Technical & Maintenance Services
Acting Chief, Special Service Division
Military Asst. for Operations & Sp. Projects
National Director
Center Head, MM Project Center
Dean, College of Engineering
Director, Special Project Office
Head, CE Laboratory
Chairperson, CE Laboratory
Dean, College of Engineering
Engr. Ariel H. Padilla

Major Ronald George F. Reario
Dr. Ernensto S. De Castro
Mr. Augusto Locsin, Jr.
Dr. Vicky S. Cruz
Ms. Marvic R. Monteloyola
Engr. Renato Aguilar
Engr. Manuel Muhi
Dr. Bernardo Leyano
Engr. Loreto Aguila
Dr. Victor Pulmano
Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering
Dr. Doracie Z. Nantes

Ms. Vangie Katigbak
Mr. Glenn Gracia
Ms. Amalia Tuazon
Mr. Virgilio T. Valles
Mr. Hector G. Dimalanta
Dr. Edmundo Lopez
Ms. Irma Javier (Alternate)
Ms. Dominica Godinez
Mr. Wilmer M. Suzara
Ediberto C. Flormata
Dr. Teresita M. Mistal
Mr. Ricardo G. Sigua
Mr. James Sian
Mr. Danila Atienza (Alternate)
Chairman, Dept. of Geography

Manager, Luzon Opeartions
VP, GSM Network Operations

Mdeical Officer VII, Chef, ELHAD
Social Welfare Officer III
Principal Engineer A, CE Design Division
Chief Insp.
Director, Bureau of Local Government
-1-8-
Final Report
Table 1.3.4
Members of the Counterparts
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority

Mr. Ramon J. Santiago
Ms. Corazon L. Macasieb
Ms. Luzviminda C. Murao
Ms. Corazon DJ Agulan
Ms. Ma. Teresa M. Amarillo
Mr. Roderick Teofilo Joel B Aguilar
Mr. William A Olangco
Mr. Mario F. Malacad
Ms. Margeline J. Serion
Ms. Josephine R. Sy
Mr. Pedro B. Rafuson, Jr.
Ms. Veronica G. Villamor
Ms. Cora M. Medallo
Mr. William H. Chavez
Mr. Rommel C. Millora
Ms. Janette R. Castillo
Ms. Janice B. Franco
Director III, DSO

Actg Div. Chief, EPRD, DSO
Special Operations Officer II, DSO
Special Operations Officer I, DSO
Emergency Medical Technician - Basic
Emergency Medical Technician - Basic
Actg Div. Chief, DCPM, DSO
Special Operations Officer I, DSO
Planning Officer
Planning Officer
Planning Officer
Technical Staff
Technical Staff
Technical Staff
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology

Dr. Bartolome C. Bautista
Dr. Maria Leonila C. Bautista
Engr. Angelito G. Lanuza
Dr. Ishmael C. Narag
Ms. Esmeralda L. Banganan
Dr. Norman M. Tungol
Ms. Lynn P. Melosantos
Ms. Ma. Antonia V. Bornas
Ms. Ma. Carmencita B. Arpa
Ms. Hannah T. Mirabueno
Mr. Roberto Tiglao
Ms. Mylene M. Villegas
Ms. Janila B. Deocampo
Mr. Erlinton Antonio B. Olavere
Ms. Jane T. Punongbayan
Ms. Mylene C. Carlos
Mr. Rommel Grutas
Ms. Sheila I. Insauriga
Mr. Dindo Javier
Ms. Regina Quiambao
Mr. Paolo Reniva
Mr. Melcario Pagtalunan
Dr. Jessie A. Daligdig
Dr. Glenda M. Besana
Ms. Joan C. Salcedo
Mr. Arturo Daag
Mr. Benjamin Santos
Ms. Julianita Ranola
Ms. Kathleen L. Papiona
Chief, Science Research Specialist

Associate Scientist, DOST
Senior Science Research Specialist
Supervising Science Research Specialist
Science Research Specialist II
Science Research Specialist
Chief, Science Research Specialist
Science Research Specialist I
Science Research Assistant
Science Research Analyst
-1-9-
1.4
Major Activities of the Study

The major activities of the Study are summarized in Table 1.4.1.
Table 1.4.1
Major Topics of the Study
Study Stage
Date
Topics
First Stage
August 15, 2002
Commencement of the Study in the Philippines
August 28, 2002
First Steering committee meeting, at MMDA Building
August 28, 2002
Orientation for the City and Municipal Disaster Action Officers (DAO)
at MMDA Building
October 9, 2002
First Technical Committee Meeting, at PHIVOLCS Auditorium
November 15, 2002
First Workshop for Metropolitan Manila Disaster Management

at EDSA Shangri-La Hotel
December 12, 2002
Orientation on progress of GIS database development, at PHIVOLCS meeting room
March 13,2003
Second Steering committee meeting, at MMDA Manila Conference Hall
May 8, 2003
Submission of Interim Report
May 15, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to MMDCC Meeting, At MMDA Manila Conference Hall
May 26, 2003
Second Technical Committee Meeting, at PHIVOLCS Auditorium
June 5, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to 17 LGU Planning Officer Meeting

at MMDA Building
June 12, 2003
Technical Committee, Sub Committee Meeting on Structural Engineering, Discussion of

Building Damage Estimation, at PHIVOLCS Auditorium
August 5, 2003
Workshop for Community Based Disaster Management, at Manila Pavilion Hotel
August 8, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to MMDA Chairman, at MMDA Building
August 11, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to NDCC Chairman, at OCD Building
August 19, 2003
Third Steering committee meeting, at MMDA Manila Conference Hall
August 19, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to 17 LGU City Administrators

at Makati City Hall
August 20, 2003
Explanation of the Study Progress to UN-OCHA, request from NDCC,

at OCD Building
August 26, 2003
Second Workshop for Metropolitan Manila Disaster Management

at EDSA Shangri-La Hotel
September 25 - 26, 2003
Makati City Disaster Management 1st Workshop, at Makati City Hall
November 13-14, 2003
Makati City Disaster Management 2nd Workshop, at Makati City Hall
November 25, 2003
GIS Technical Transfer to PHIVOLCS, at PHIVOLCS Lecture Room
November 27, 2003
GIS Technical Transfer to MMDA, at MMDA Manila Hall
Second Stage
LGU
MMDCC
NDCC
OCD
UN-OCHA
November 28, 2003
Topographical Map Turn Over, at Mandarin Oriental Hotel
February 3, 2004
Third Steering committee meeting, at MMDA Manila Conference Hall
February 4, 2004
Seminar on Earthquake Disaster Management, at Makati Shangri-la Hotel
February 5, 2004
Seminar on Community Based Disaster Management, at Manila Pavilion Hotel
Local Government Unit

Metropolitan Manila Disaster Coordination Council
National Disaster Coordination Council
United Nations, Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
-1-10-

Mmiers 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mmiers 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mmiers 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Formation of the Final Report

The Final Report is comprised of the following volumes:

The following foreign exchange rate is applied on this study report;

Upon returning to Japan, the team

conducted further studies and prepared this final report.

Dear Mr. MATSUOKA,

Very truly yours,

METRO MANILA COUNCIL

MMDA Resolution No. 04-03

Further respectfully request the President of the Republic of the Philippines

BENJAMIN C. ABALOS, JR.

PROFILE OF THE STUDY

From August 2002 to March 2004

Background and Contents of the Study

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO

Urban Vulnerability against Earthquake Damage

Flammability and Evacuation

3) South Eastern Manila City Area

1) North Eastern Quezon City Area

4) Muntinlupa Laguna Bay Area

1) Valenzuela-Kalookan South-Quezon west intersection

Overall Structure of the Plan

Goals, Objectives and Frameworks

To develop a national system resistant to earthquake impact

To improve Metropolitan Manilas urban structure resistant to earthquake

To enhance effective risk management system

To increase community resilience

To formulate reconstruction systems

Frameworks and Action Plans

Priority Action Plans

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STUDY RESULTS

Study for Earthquake Impact Reduction for Metropolitan Manila in

Japan International Cooperation Agency

Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA)

From August 2002 to March 2004

Government of the Philippines

Study Implementing Body

Background of the Study

Scope of the Study

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO

Will not occur

PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale (PEIS)

Wind Speed 3m/s

Residential Building Damage and Human Casualties

Burnt area and

Wind Speed 3m/s

Infrastructure and Lifeline Damage

Mid-rise and High-rise

Urban Vulnerability against Earthquake Damage

Flammability and Evacuation

3) South Eastern Manila City Area

1) North Eastern Quezon City Area

4) Muntinlupa Laguna Bay Area

1) Valenzuela-Kalookan South-Quezon west intersection

Basic policy / Basic concept of framework

Overall structure of the Plan

Goals, Objectives and Frameworks

To develop a national system resistant to earthquake impact