Articulo AtaxiadeFriedreich
Articulo AtaxiadeFriedreich
Articulo AtaxiadeFriedreich
Vol. 22
June 2008
WELLS
Vol. 22
June 2008
A rather different mechanism of transcriptional silencing has been investigated by Saveliev et al. (67) based on
the packaging of DNA within chromatin. DNA embodied in chromatin and heterochromatin has been implicated in gene silencing. DNA wraps around histones,
creating nucleosomes in chromatin. Repetitive DNA
sequences have the propensity to package genomic
regions into inaccessible heterochromatin structures
that can lead to gene silencing (67). Prior in vitro
investigations (68) revealed that long tracts of repeating CTGCAG bind histones tightly and position
nucleosomes. Alternatively, long tracts of the fragile X
CCGCGG repeats displayed strong nucleosome exclusion (69, 70). Hence, a precedent was established in
vitro for a profound influence of TRS on chromatin
structure. The FXN TRS confer variegation of expression on a linked transgene in mice (67). Silencing was
correlated with a decrease in promoter accessibility and
was enhanced by the classical position effect variegation
modified heterochromatin protein 1. Interestingly, the
TRS-associated variegation was not restricted to classical heterochromatic regions but occurred irrespective
of chromosomal location. Hence, the mechanisms responsible for the heterochromatin-mediated silencing
might have a role in gene regulation throughout the
mammalian genome and, thus, modulate the extent of
gene silencing and possibly the severity of several TRS
diseases (67).
In contrast, direct binding measurements have been
conducted in vitro on plasmids containing long tracts of
GAATTC duplex as well as GAAGAATTC triplexes
(H. Ruan and Y.-H. Wang, unpublished results). The
duplex excludes nucleosome assembly, and the triplex
further lowers the nucleosome assembly efficiency. The
difference in assembly efficiency is amplified when
hypoacetylated histones were used, compared to assembly with hyperacetylated histones. Also, the triplex
structure destabilizes the extent of adjacent sequences
to assemble nucleosome arrays. Thus, these in vitro
investigations on the GAATTC duplex and triplex
structures reveal profound influences on local chromatin structure.
Relationship between in vitro and in vivo chromatin
structure determinations
This apparent discrepancy in FRDA systems between in
vitro binding measurements, where the GAATTC tracts
and/or triplexes inhibit nucleosome assembly, and the
in vivo genetic determinations (67), which indicate an
enhancement of heterochromatin formation by the
long GAATTC repeats, may be resolved by further
biochemical experiments in the future. Other studies
with histone deacetylase inhibitors indicate that a heterochromatin structure is present in the region surrounding the expanded GAATTC repeats and inhibits
the transcription of the FXN gene in cells from patients
(71). Heterochromatin is enriched with hypoacetylated
histones, which our results (see above) suggest could
distinguish the GAATTC duplex and the triplex from
WELLS
adjacent (flanking) sequences more than with hyperacetylated histones. Hence, the presence of the hypoacetylated histones at the expanded GAATTC site
might increase accessibility to other chromatin-remodeling proteins, which result in heterochromatin
structure and/or promoting the formation of the
GAAGAATTC triplex.
Also, the observation of a difference between heterochromatin-like structure present in vivo adjacent to the
expanded GAATTC repeat and in vitro nucleosome
exclusion of the GAATTC repeats is reminiscent of the
results with the CGGCCG repeats in the FMR1 gene of
fragile X syndrome patients (69, 72). For the fragile X
syndrome, the discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo
studies suggests that epigenetic events, such as DNA
CpG methylation, play a role in the formation of
unusual chromatin structure over the expanded
CGGCCG repeats. Although the GAATTC repeats in
FRDA do not contain intrinsic CpG dinucleotides, a
CpG island is located 1 kb upstream of the GAATTC
repeats at the boundary of exon/intron 1 of the FXN
gene (H. Ruan and Y.-H. Wang, unpublished results).
In fact, three CpG dinucleotides located at the 5 end
of the GAATTC repeat have been shown to posses
preferential methylation in FRDA patients (73). The
nucleosome exclusion of the GAATTC repeats could
increase the accessibility of these regions to various
protein machineries, such as DNA methyltransferase.
In summary, further investigations must be conducted
in FRDA systems in order to resolve the apparent
discrepancy between the conclusions derived from in
vivo genetic investigations on heterochromatin formation and the in vitro direct binding studies.
A different epigenetic study has focused on DNA
methylation in segments of the FXN gene, which flank
the GAATTC repeat tract in intron 1. Greene et al. (73)
showed that a region adjacent to the TRS was methylated in both the unaffected and affected individuals.
However, methylation was more extensive in patients.
Furthermore, three residues were almost completely
methylation-free in unaffected individuals but almost
always methylated in patients with FRDA. One of these
residues is located within an E-box, whose deletion
caused a significant drop in promoter activity in reporter assays. Elevated levels of histone H3 dimethylated on lysine 9 were found in FRDA cells, consistent
with a more repressive chromatin organization. This
type of chromatin is known to reduce transcription
elongation. Hence, this could be a mechanism where
the expanded repeats contribute to the frataxin deficit
in FRDA.
In summary, in vitro and in vivo investigations on the
role of long tracts of GAATTC on transcription are
consistent with the recessive nature of the disease and
its loss of function characteristics. Considering all of the
30 hereditary neurological diseases (74) caused by
expansions of triplet repeats (4), FRDA may be the
clearest case of a well-defined biochemical step (transcription) that is inhibited, thus causing the disease
etiology. Accordingly, this realization elevates the hope
of being able to develop effective therapeutics (see
Therapeutic Strategies) to ameliorate the disease manifestations.
DNA TRIPLEXES AND FRIEDREICH ATAXIA
Genetic instabilities
The genetic instabilities of TRS (repeating GAATTC,
CTGCAG, and CGGCCG) associated with approximately 30 hereditary neurological disorders (4, 14, 39,
74, 86) occur by DNA replication, recombination, and
repair (especially methyl-directed mismatch repair and
nucleotide excision repair) as studied in pro- and
eukaryotic model systems. These biochemical-genetic
processes probably act in concert due to slippage of the
complementary strands relative to each other. The
biophysical properties of the folded-back repeating
sequence strands have a critical role in these instabilities. The non-B DNA structural elements include hairpins, slipped structures, DNA unwinding elements,
tetraplexes, triplexes, and sticky DNA. The replication
1629
mechanisms are influenced by pausing of the replication fork, orientation of the triplet repeat strands,
location of the repeat sequences relative to the replication origins, and flap endonucleases. The long
GAATTC tracts associated with FRDA are expanded
and deleted by mechanisms similar to the other known
TRS (4, 14, 39, 74). However, in contrast to the other
TRS involved with myotonic dystrophy, Huntingtons
disease, fragile X syndrome, etc., it seems that sticky
DNA occurs and functions only in the FXN gene, which
is one of the 20 25,000 genes in humans. Whereas
other related sequences will form sticky DNA (25),
none of these sequences has been identified yet with
disease syndromes.
Genetic instability investigations on TRS responsible
for FRDA, myotonic dystrophy, fragile X syndrome, and
Huntingtons disease from 1990 to 2003 indicated
that the TRS underwent either expansions or deletions
with few or no base pair changes to the flanking
sequences. However, more recent investigations (14,
17, 58, 80, 82, 87 89) showed that substantial deletions,
rearrangements, duplications, translocations, and inversions occurred in flanking sequences, in addition to
the repeating triplet or tetranucleotide repeats. Rearrangements of several kbp were observed and were
promoted by long tracts of GAATTC, CTGCAG,
CCAGCTGG, or CGGCCG. Thus, the presence of the
simple repeating sequence has a profound influence
on the repair-recombination properties of flanking
DNA sequences.
An insightful family of investigations (58) revealed
that the non-B DNA conformations (triplexes or sticky
DNA and slipped structures) formed by a portion of the
long repeating tracts of FRDA, myotonic dystrophy type
1, and myotonic dystrophy type 2 genes, not the sequences per se, promoted mutagenesis in the flanking
DNA regions. Studies in E. coli and three types of
mammalian (COS-7, CV-1, and HEK293) fibroblast-like
cells revealed that conditions that promoted the formation of the non-B structures enhanced the genetic
instabilities, both in the repeat tracts and in the flanking sequences of up to 4 kbp. The three strategies
utilized included: the in vivo modulation of global
negative supercoil density using topA and gyrB mutant
E. coli strains; the in vivo cleavage of hairpin loops,
which are an obligate consequence of slipped-strand
structures, cruciforms, and intramolecular triplexes, by
inactivation of the SbcC protein; and by genetic instability studies with plasmids containing long repeating
sequence inserts that do, and do not, adopt non-B DNA
structures in vitro (58). Thus, it was possible to tease
apart the effects of the sequences vs. the conformations. Clearly, the conformations are the culprits.
Even earlier investigations (87) demonstrated that
the slipped structures, cruciforms, and sticky DNA
adopted by long tracts of GAATTC, CGGCCG, and
CTGCAG repeats were responsible for the genetic
instabilities of these sequences. The influence of negative superhelical density on the genetic instabilities of
these repeat tracts was studied in vivo in topologically
constrained plasmids in E. coli. The capacity of these
DNA tracts to undergo deletions-expansions was explored with three genetic-biochemical approaches, in1630
Vol. 22
June 2008
THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES
FRDA is an attractive disease target for experimental
therapeutics since apparently only a single gene is
WELLS
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Unanswered questions include the following:
What is the mechanism of transcription silencing? Is
it one of the three mechanisms described in Transcription Inhibition by Long Tracts of GAATTC or another
process?
Does sticky or triplex DNA exist and function in
humans? What is the relationship to FRDA?
What is the detailed molecular structure of sticky
DNA, a unique non-B DNA conformation, both in vivo
and in vitro?
What is the equilibrium in vivo between the triplex
(sticky) DNA structure and the orthodox B-DNA form
of the GAATTC repeats? Since sticky DNA inhibits
replication, transcription, recombination, and repair,
cells could not survive or divide if this conformation was
dominant and very long lived in vivo. Thus, what is the
lifetime of this transient structure?
What is the role, if any, of heterochromatin in FRDA
gene silencing?
What is the role of DNA methylation in FRDA?
What is the molecular biological mechanism in humans of the genetic instability of GAATTC? Is this
process conducted by replication, recombination, or
repair or a combination of all three mechanisms acting
in concert?
What is the role in FRDA etiology, if any, of mutagenesis promoted by GAATTC in DNA tracts flanking the
TRS?
Could genomic translocations (copy number variations, deletions, insertions, inversions, etc.) play a role,
at least for some patients, in the mutation spectra?
Many reviews and papers repeat the declaration that
98% of all FRDA cases are due to the expansion of the
GAATTC repeats and 2% are due to point mutations
(1). Is this the entire range of mutations in the FXN
gene or might future detailed analyses reveal the existence of other types of mutations that could be caused
by the presence of long GAATTC repeats (see Mutagenesis)? Note that the fragile X mutation spectra is
1631
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
Remarkable advances have been made in our understanding of the pathophysiology of FRDA in the past
decade. Indeed, it was only in 1996 when the gene was
cloned and sequenced. At the Third International
Friedreichs Ataxia Scientific Conference at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). in
November 2006, the Director of the National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke noted in her
opening remarks that there was a palpable sense of
energy, excitement, and enthusiasm over the scientific
progress made (51). One conclusion from this review
article is an agreement with this sentiment and an
acknowledgment that substantial additional work needs
to be concentrated on fundamental mechanisms responsible for the initial steps in the disease etiology.
FRDA is a conceptually tractable disease for the reasons
that are stated above (Therapeutic Strategies), since
molecular events at the DNA level are primary, hence,
the research focus should be localized on this initial
step. Accordingly, any normalization of the TRS mutation should be focused at this primary step and not
targeted to downstream events. It is critical to determine the fundamental molecular biological cause for
transcription silencing (non-B DNA structures or heterochromatin or methylation or other mechanisms).
Therapeutics for FRDA may be more advanced than for
any other of the 30 hereditary neurological diseases
caused by repeat expansion mechanisms.
Since the number of investigators conducting innovative research in this area has expanded greatly over
the past decade (51), hope is raised for viable treatment
and therapeutic strategies for the future. The development of high-throughput assays to evaluate the efficacy
of a large number of ligands that may be therapeutically successful is currently underway.
I thank the N.I.H. (ES11347), Friedreichs Ataxia Research
Alliance, Seek a Miracle, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation for support, and Drs. Marek Napierala and Albino
Bacolla for helpful discussions. I also express appreciation to
J. E. Larson for 40 years of research on non-B DNA structures.
All materials from the R. D. Wells laboratory will be transferred to Dr. Sergei Mirkin (Tufts University, Department of
Biology, Barnum 101B, 163 Packard Ave., Medford, MA
02155, USA. E-mail: sergei.mirkin@tufts.edu). The author
conveys his apologies to colleagues whose fine work could not
be cited due to a journal restriction on the number of
references and the length of the review.
1632
Vol. 22
June 2008
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
WELLS
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
1633
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
1634
tion by T7 RNA polymerase in a length and supercoil dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 28152822
Krasilnikova, M. M., Kireeva, M. L., Petrovic, V., Knijnikova, N.,
Kashlev, M., and Mirkin, S. M. (2007) Effects of Friedreichs
ataxia (GAA)n(TTC)n repeats on RNA synthesis and stability.
Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 10751084
Kohwi, Y., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. (1991) Altered gene
expression correlates with DNA structure. Genes Dev. 5, 2547
2554
Vasquez, K. M., and Wilson, J. H. (1998) Triplex-directed
modification of genes and gene activity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23,
4 9
Grabczyk, E., Mancuso, M., and Sammarco, M. C. (2007) A
persistent RNADNA hybrid formed by transcription of the
Friedreichs ataxia repeat in live bacteria, and by T7 RNAP in
vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 53515359
Saveliev, A., Everett, C., Sharpe, T., Webster, Z., and Festenstein,
R. (2003) DNA triplet repeats mediate heterochromatin-protein-1-sensitive variegated gene silencing. Nature 422, 909 913
Wang, Y.-H., Amirhaeri, S., Kang, S., Wells, R. D., and Griffith,
J. (1994) Preferential nucleosome assembly at DNA triplet
repeats from the myotonic dystrophy gene. Science 265, 669 671
Wang, Y.-H., Gellibolian, R., Shimizu, M., Wells, R. D., and
Griffith, J. (1996) Long repeating CCG triplet repeat blocks
exclude nucleosomes: a possible mechanism for the nature of
fragile sites in chromosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 263, 511516
Godde, J. S., Kass, S. U., Hirst, M. C., and Wolffe, A. P. (1996)
Nucleosome assembly on methylated CGG triplet repeats in the
fragile X mental retardation gene 1 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 271,
2432524328
Herman, D., Jenssen, K., Burnett, R., Soragni, E., Perlman, S.,
and Gottesfeld, J. M. (2006) Histone deacetylase inhibitors
reverse gene silencing in Friedreichs ataxia. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2,
551558
Wang, Y.-H. (2007) Chromatin structure of repeating CTG/
CAG and CGG/CCG sequences in human disease. Front. Biosci.
12, 4731 4741
Greene, E., Mahishi, L., Entezam, A., Kumari, D., and Usdin, K.
(2007) Repeat-induced epigenetic changes in intron 1 of the
frataxin gene and its consequences in Friedreichs ataxia. Nucleic
Acids Res. 35, 33833390
Mirkin, S. M. (2007) Expandable DNA repeats and human
disease. Nature 447, 932940
Chin, J. Y., Schleifman, E. B., and Glazer, P. M. (2007) Repair
and recombination induced by triple helix DNA. Front. Biosci.
12, 4288 4297
Wang, G., and Vasquez, K. M. (2006) Non-B DNA structureinduced genetic instability. Mutat. Res. 598, 103119
Vasquez, K., Narayanan, L., and Glazer, P. M. (2000) Specific
mutations induced by triplex-forming oligonucleotides in mice.
Science 290, 530 533
Wang, G., and Vasquez, K. M. (2004) Naturally occurring
H-DNA forming sequences are mutagenic in mammalian cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 13448 13453
Wang, G., Christensen, L. A., and Vasquez, K. M. (2006)
Z-DNA-forming sequences generate large-scale deletions in
mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 26772682
Wells, R. D. (2007) Non-B conformations, mutagenesis, and
diseases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 271278
Bacolla, A., Wojciechowska, M., Kosmider, B., Larson, J. E., and
Wells, R. D. (2006) The involvement of non-B DNA structures in
gross chromosomal rearrangements. DNA Repair 5, 11611170
Kosmider, B., and Wells, R. D. (2006) Double-strand breaks in
the myotonic dystrophy type 1 and the fragile X syndrome
Vol. 22
June 2008
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
WELLS