A330 OEB Final Report

EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY
Operational Evaluation Board Report

Airbus A330
A330-200, A330-200F, A330-300 Series
OPS/FCL Report
28 March 2011
European Aviation Safety Agency
Postfach 10 12 53
D-50452 Kln
Germany
EASA Operational Evaluation Board Airbus A330 FCL & OPS Subgroup
Airbus A330
A330-200, A330-200F, A330-300 Series
Operational Evaluation Board (OEB) OPS / FCL Subgroup
Jean-Claude Albert
OEB Chairman A330-200F
Captain Herbert Meyer

Section Manager, Large Aircraft
Flight Standards Department, EASA Certification Directorate
Revision Record
Rev. No.
Original
1
A330 OEB, Revision 01
Content
A330-200, A330-300 new evaluation
A330-200F incorporated
Date
20 Dec 2004
28 March 2011
page 2
Contents
Page
OEB OPS/FCL Subgroup ............................................................................................................ 2
Revision Record ............................................................................................................................ 2
Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 5
Preamble ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 7
1.
Background ................................................................................................................ 7
2.
Scope of the evaluation ............................................................................................... 7
3.
Evaluation Process ..................................................................................................... 7
4.
Results ....................................................................................................................... 8
5.
Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 8
OEB Report FCL & OPS Subgroup ............................................................................................ 9

1.
Purpose and Applicability ............................................................................................ 9
2.
Pilot Type Rating Requirements ................................................................................. 9
3.
Master Common Requirements .................................................................................. 9

3.1 Altitude Callouts during Landing ............................................................................ 9
3.2 Aircraft Approach Categories .............................................................................. 10
4.
Master Differences Requirements Tables ................................................................. 10
5.
Operator Differences Requirements Tables .............................................................. 11
6.
Specifications for Training .......................................................................................... 11

6.1 Initial Type Rating Course (Transition Course) ..................................................... 11
6.1.1 Areas of Emphasis .................................................................................. 11
6.1.2 Type Rating Course ................................................................................. 13
6.2 Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) ............................................................... 14
6.2.1 Purpose of LIFUS ................................................................................... 14
6.2.2 LIFUS in case of initial type rating onto any A330 variant ......................... 14
page 3
Page
6.3 Familiarization Course and Sectors .................................................................... 14
6.3.1 Familiarization Courses .......................................................................... 14
6.3.2 Familiarization Sectors ............................................................................ 15
6.4 Recurrent Training .............................................................................................. 15
7. Specifications for Checking .......................................................................................... 15
7.1 Skill Test Following a Type-Rating Course (transition Course) ............................ 15
7.2 Recurrent Checking Checks ............................................................................... 15
7.3 Line Checks ........................................................................................................ 16
8. Currency / Recent Experience ..................................................................................... 16
9. Operational Recommendations .................................................................................... 16
10. Additional Operational Recommendations specific to the A330-200F ........................ 17
10.1 Categories of Occupants Accepted in the Courier Compartment ...................... 17
10.2 Aeroplane Search Procedure Checklist ............................................................. 17
10.3 Weight and Balance / Cargo Considerations ..................................................... 17
10.4 Flight Emergency Procedure Following MDCC Smoke Alert ............................. 18
Annexes
Annex 1 Typical Airbus A330 Type Rating Course ........................................................ 19
Annex 2 Airbus A330 Recurrent Training Matrix between Variants ............................... 20
page 4
Acronyms
AFM .................. Airplane Flight Manual
AMC................... Acceptable Means of Compliance
AOC .................. Airline Operations Communications
A/THR ................ Auto Throttle
CBT ................... Computer Based Training
CCOM................ Cabin Crew Operation Manual
CCQ................... Cross Crew Qualification
CPD ................... Common Procedures Document
CRM ................. Crew Resource Management
EASA ................. European Aviation Safety Agency
ECAM ................ Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring System
EGPWS ............. Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System
ETOPS .............. Extended range operations for two-engine aeroplanes
EU-OPS ............. Annex III to Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91
FAA ................... Federal Aviation Administration
FCL ................... Flight Crew Licensing
FCOM ............... Flight Crew Operating Manual
FCTM................. Flight Crew Training Manual
FCU ................... Flight Control Unit
FFS ................... Full Flight Simulator
FMA ................... Flight Mode Annunciator
FMS .................. Flight Management System
FSB ................... FAA Flight Standardization Board
FSTD ................ Flight Simulation Training Device
GPWS ............... Ground Proximity Warning System
IEM .................... Interpretative / Explanatory Material
JAA .................... Joint Aviation Authorities
JAR ................... Joint Aviation Requirements
JOEB ................. JAA Joint Operational Evaluation Board
LIFUS ................ Line Flying Under Supervision
LOFT ................. Line Orientated Flying Training
MCDU ................ Multi-Function Control Display Unit
MCR .................. Master Common Requirements
MDCC ................ Main Deck Cargo Compartment
MDR .................. Master Differences Requirements
MFF ................... Mixed Fleet Flying
NAA ................... National Aviation Authority
ODR................... Operator Differences Requirements
OEB ................... Operational Evaluation Board
PIC .................... Pilot In Command
SIC .................... Second In Command
TCAS ................ Traffic Alert Collision Avoidance System
TRTO ................ Type Rating Training Organization
ZFTT ................. Zero Flight Time Training
page 5
Preamble
The initial operational evaluation of the A330-200/-300 series was conducted in a catch-up
process, based on the differences between the variants using the findings of existing evaluation
reports from JAA National Aviation Authorities and from the FAA, as no operational evaluation had
been carried out at the time of entry into service of the A330.
Additional specific items which are related to the entry into service of the Airbus A330-200
Freighter (A330-200F) were evaluated by a subsequent OEB and are incorporated in Revision 1
of this report.
As a result of these operational evaluations, a single license endorsement for the A330-200, A330200F and the A330-300 is recommended in accordance with Appendix 1 to JAR-FCL 1.220.
This report further specifies the EASA pilot type rating, initial training course, familiarization
courses, checking and currency minimum requirements, and operational recommendations:
for an initial pilot type rating on the A330 series; and
for pilots already qualified on one A330 variant and transitioning to another variant.
The initial evaluation was conducted in accordance with the JAA Terms of Reference and the
JOEB Handbook. The A330-200F evaluation was conducted in compliance with the applicable
EASA OEB Handbook and Common Procedure Document (CPD) for conducting Operational
Evaluation Boards.
28 March 2011
Evan Nielsen
Head of Flight Standards Department
Certification Directorate
page 6
Executive Summary
1.
Background
1.1
The initial A330-200/-300 series operational evaluation was conducted by the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) in accordance with JAA JOEB requirements and was completed in December
2004.
1.2
Asubsequent A330-200F operational evaluation was conducted by the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) in accordance with EASA OEB requirements and was completed in
February 2011.
2.
Scope of the evaluation
2.1
Airbus requested confirmation that the A330-200, A330-200F and A330-300 share the
same type rating and should therefore have a single type rating licence endorsement: A330 for all
variants. Also,pilots holding an A330 type rating achieved on the A330-200, A330-200F or the
A330-300 should be able to qualify on another variant after completion of familiarization training
using CBT as a ground school tool to cover technical differences.
3.
Evaluation Process
3.1
Initial evaluation of the A330-200 and A330-300
During this evaluation, JAA JAR requirements of JAR-OPS 1 ( 1.940, 1.945, 1.950, 1.965, 1.970
and 1.980 including associated appendices, AMCs and IEMs) and JAR-FCL 1 (1.215, 1.220,
1.225, 1.230 1.235, 1.240 and 1.261 including associated appendices, AMCs and IEMs) have
been considered.
System differences were reviewed and Normal, Abnormal, and Emergency procedures compared
between the A330-200 and A330-300. Airbus provided ODR tables as a basis for the evaluation.
Sample ODRs were examined and proposed CBT was reviewed.Previous evaluations made by the
France DGAC, on behalf the JAA for the A330/A340 in April 1998 was also considered. (Refer to
Annex 3).
3.2
Subsequent evaluation of the A330-200F
A dedicated operational evaluation for the A330-200F was conducted. During this evaluation, the
requirements contained in EU-OPS ( 1.940, 1.945, 1.950, 1.965, 1.970 and 1.980 including
associated appendices and Temporary Guide Leaflet -TGL 44) and JAR-FCL 1 (1.215, 1.220,
1.225, 1.230 1.235, 1.240 and 1.261 including associated appendices, AMCs and IEMs) have
been considered.
page 7
System differences were reviewed and Normal, Abnormal, and Emergency procedures compared
between the A330-200/-300 and the A330-200F. Airbus provided ODR tables as a basis for the
evaluation. Sample ODRs were examined and proposed CBT was reviewed.
4.
Results
4.1
Initial evaluation of the A330-200 and A330-300
The JOEB confirmed that only Level B differences (aircraft are functionally similar) exist between
the A330-200 and the A330-300.
Ground courseware using CBT/Video/Transparencies is adequate to cover these differences when
transitioning from:
the A330-200 variant to the A330-300 variant; and
the A330-300 variant to the A330-200 variant.
4.2
Subsequent evaluation of the A330-200F
The OEB confirmed that only Level "B" differences (aircraft are functionally similar) exist between
the A330-200/-300 and the A330-200F.
Ground courseware using CBT/Video/Transparencies is adequate to cover these differences when
transitioning from:
the A330-200/300 variant to the A330-200F variant; and
the A330-200F variant to the A330-200/-300 variant.
5.
Conclusion
EASA recommends the approval of the Airbus proposed training courses for initial type rating on
the A330 and familiarization training for variants.
EASA confirms the same type rating, A330 (as single licence endorsement) is applied to all
variants of the A330.
1
Manufacturer
2 Aeroplanes
3
Model
Name
A330 Airbus
300 series
- 200 series
- 200 F
4
Licence Endorsement
A330
Note on references and reference texts:

Where references are made to requirements and where extracts of reference texts are provided, these are at
the amendment state at the date of publication of the report. Readers should take note that it is impractical to
update these references to take account of subsequent amendments to the source documents.
page 8
Operational Evaluation Report FCL & OPS Subgroup

1.
Purpose and Applicability
This report
defines the Type Rating assigned to the A330 family;
proposes Master Common Requirements (MCR);
describes Master Differences Requirements (MDR) for crews requiring differences training;
provides reference of acceptable Operator Difference Requirements (ODR) tables;
makes recommendations for initial training;
makes recommendations for familiarization training courses;
makes recommendations for checking; and
makes recommendations for currency.
2.
Pilot Type Rating requirements
In reference to JAR FCL1 Subpart F and to the OEB evaluation procedures, the same type rating
and, consequently, the same licence endorsement are assigned to the A330-200, the A330-200F
and the A330-300.
Pilots completing the necessary training and checks in the A330-200, A330-200F or A330-300 as
per JAR- FCL 1, prescribed by this report, are assigned the A330 type rating.
Unless otherwise specified, A330 or A330 family means A330-200, A330-200F and A330-300
variants throughout the report.
3.
Master Common Requirements
Master Common Requirements (MCR) are requirements common to the A330 family.The A330200, A330-200F and A330-300 variants have been designed with a very high level of commonality
in terms of:
cockpit layout;
system definition and operation; and
handling characteristics.
This level of commonality has a direct and significant impact on the definition of the training
programmes.
3.1 Altitude callouts during landing
Use of automatic voice callouts for landing is the same for all A330 aircraft.
These callouts may be customized consistent with regulatory requirements for low visibility
operation (e.g. EU-OPS) for the intended operation. Operators flying more than one A330 variant
should standardize those callouts within their fleet.
page 9
3.2 Aircraft Approach Categories:

With reference to EU-OPS Appendix 2 to 1.430(c) the approach categories are as follows:
Aircraft
4.
Category
A330-200
A330-200F
A330-300
Master Differences Requirements tables
Master Difference Requirements (MDR) for the A330 aircraft are shown in the table below. The
initial MDRs for the A330-200 and A330-300 were based on the FAA FSB report, the subsequent
addition of the A330-200F is based on the OEB evaluation.
Definitions of the various levels for Training/Checking/Currency are those used in the CPD. For
reference, the relevant definitions are included below the table.
TO
A330-200
A330-200F
A330-300
n/a
B/A/A
B/A/A
A330-200F
B/A/A
n/a
B/A/A
A330-300
B/A/A
B/A/A
n/a
FROM
A330-200
n/a means Not Applicable
Difference level definitions Training/Checking/Currency extracted from the CPD:

Level B Training. Level B difference training is applicable to functionally similar aircraft
with system or procedure differences that can adequately be addressed through aided
instruction. At Level B, aided instruction is appropriate to ensure crew understanding,
emphasize issues, provide a standardised method of presentation of material, or to aid
retention of material following training. Level B aided instruction typically employs such
methods as slide/tape presentations, Computer Based Training (CBT), stand-up lectures,
or videotapes.
Level A Checking. Level A checking indicates that no check related to differences is
required at the time of differences training. A crewmember is, however, responsible for
knowledge of each variant flown, and differences may (and should) be included as an
integral part of subsequent recurrent proficiency checks.
page 10
Level A Currency. At Level A currency is considered to be common to each variant. Thus,

assessment or tracking of currency for separate variants is not necessary or applicable.
Maintenance of currency at in any one variant or a combination of variants suffices for any
other variant.
5.
Operator Differences Requirements Tables
ODR tables are used to show an operators compliance method. Airbus generic ODR tables are on
file with EASA. Copies are available on request. These ODR tables are provided as Airbus generic
and therefore may not include items that are applicable to particular operators. The ODR tables
assume that pilots are qualified, current and experienced in operating the base aircraft.
The initial A330-200/-300 series Airbus ODR tables were developed in accordance with AMC
1.980(b) & IEM 1.980(b) of JAR-OPS 1 Subpart N. For the A330-200F, the Airbus ODR tables
have been developed in accordance with EU-OPS 1.980 and TGL 44 AMC & IEM to Appendix 1 to
OPS 1.980.
These ODR tables have been found acceptable by EASA. They represent an acceptable means of
compliance with MDR provisions for the aircraft evaluated based on those differences and
compliance methods shown. These tables do not necessarily represent the only means of
compliance for operators with aircraft having other differences.
Operators using more than one A330 variant must have approved ODR tables pertinent to their
fleet.
6
Specifications for Training
6.1
Initial Type Rating course (transition course)
6.1.1 Area of emphasis

Features within the electronic flight control system and its associated side stick controller, the
A/THR system, and the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring system (ECAM) warrant special
interest and emphasis.
NOTE: The following applies to the A330 family but also to all aircraft types and variants
that belong to the Airbus fly by wire family.
In light of the unique features of this aircraft family, the OEB has determined that certain aspects of
knowledge, skills and abilities must be emphasized during the initial training process.
page 11
The following areas of emphasis apply to the entire A330 family:

Fly by wire
- Knowledge of flight characteristics and the degree of flight envelope protection
provided by the various flight control laws both for pitch, roll and yaw control
- Procedural and handling consequences following multiple failures that result in
alternate and/or direct law
- Knowledge of the use of side stick controller with a special emphasis on the
relationship between the two controllers and the transfer of control
Use of the Flight Management System
- Knowledge of the various modes of automation
- Knowledge and skills related to MCDU / FCU use
- Recognition of mode awareness and transition modes through the FMA
- CRM issues linked to automation (task sharing and crosschecks)
Use of ECAM
- Knowledge of appropriate use of ECAM in conjunction with system failures
- Crew discipline for ECAM actions: respect of the depicted procedure, crosscheck of
irreversible actions, aircraft status analysis
Auto Thrust system
- Knowledge of the thrust control system in conjunction with the non-moving throttles
- Recognition of all messages associated to Auto Thrust failure, engagement and
disconnection
The following additional areas of emphasis apply to the A330-200F:
Flight Emergency procedure following cabin depressurization
- Knowledge of appropriate procedures (specific to the A330-200F) regarding the
survey of the cabin and the communication with occupants after a cabin
depressurization
Flight Emergency procedure following MDCC Smoke Alert (specific to the A330-200F)
- Knowledge of appropriate procedures regarding the fire protection (MDCC smoke)
and commanded depressurization (MDCC smoke).
page 12
6.1.2
Type rating course
The Airbus proposed type-rating training (transition course) is in compliance with Appendix 2 to
JAR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295 and AMC FCL 1.261 (c) (2).
The course is divided into the following phases:
ground phase;
normal phase;
abnormal/emergency phase;
LOFT phase;
skill test (see para. 7 checking for details); and
flight phase (base training, if applicable).
All flight crew are Trained to Proficiency. The objectives and phases breakdown are included in
Annex 1. They are extracted from the Airbus Flight Crew Training Programme (FCTP) approved
under Airbus TRTO documentation, and reflect the status of the A330 type-rating course.
For a pilot to be qualified onto a specific variant of the A330, several paths exist depending upon
simulator availability. These paths are as follows:
a)
Qualification onto A330-200

Type Rating course conducted in an A330-200 simulator, or
Type Rating course conducted in an A330-300 simulator and then familiarization course
from A330-300 to A330-200
b)
Qualification onto A330-200F

Type rating course conducted in an A330-200 simulator and then familiarization course
from A330-200 to A330-200F; or
Type rating course conducted in an A330-300 simulator and then familiarization course
from A330-300 to A330-200F
c)
Qualification onto A330-300

Type rating course conducted in an A330-300 simulator; or
Type Rating course conducted in an A330-200 simulator and then familiarization course
from A330-200 to A330-300
In summary, for type rating course on the A330 family, any simulator configuration can be used,
provided that the familiarization training for the variant to be flown is subsequently conducted.
page 13
6.2
Line flying under supervision (LIFUS)
6.2 .1 Purpose of LIFUS

There are a variety of reasons why the OEB may specify LIFUS in conjunction with master
difference requirements. One or more of the reasons described below may apply:
a.
Introduction of new aircraft types or variants;
b.
Introduction of new systems (e.g., FMS, TCAS);
c.
Introduction of new operation (e.g. oceanic, polar or ETOPS operations);
d.
Experience for a particular crew position (e.g. PIC, SIC, F/E);
e.
Post qualification skill refinement (e.g. refining alternate or multiple ways to use
particular equipment to increase operating efficiency, operating flexibility, or
convenience); or
f.
Special characteristics (e.g. airport category in accordance with EU-OPS 1.975,

mountainous areas, unusual or adverse weather, special air traffic control procedures,
non-standard runway surfaces and dimensions, etc.).
6.2.2 LIFUS in case of initial type rating onto any A330 variant
In the case of an initial type rating onto the A330, a minimum of 10 sectors including a line check is
recommended for LIFUS.
This may be reduced at the discretion of the NAA taking in account relevant factors such as
EASA/OEB CCQ/MFF evaluations and previous Airbus fly by wire experience of the pilots.
Where there is a change of operating conditions or route structure this should also be taken into
account and may need the addition of sectors to cover these elements.
6.3
Familiarization courses and sectors
6.3.1 Familiarization courses

The OEB recommends approving the Airbus familiarization training courses:
The transition between the A330-200 & A330-300 and the transition between the A330-200/-300 &
A330-200F have been assessed as requiring Level B training.
Familiarization training is based upon clearly defined learning objectives and addresses all
differences as identified in the ODR tables.
Airbus familiarization courses provided under CBT have been assessed and found acceptable.
page 14
6.3.2 Familiarization sectors

Following familiarization training between A330 variants, the OEB does not find any need for
familiarization sectors.
NOTE: Familiarization sectors differ from LIFUS, as a line check is not required following
completion of those familiarization sectors, when required.
6.4
Recurrent training
The recurrent training programme must comply with EU-OPS 1.965.

All A330 variants are under the same license endorsement. As a consequence, recurrent training
on one variant is valid for all, provided that the differences between variants are covered.
Differences between the A330 variants are identified in ODR tables, as specified under EU-OPS
1.980.
Differences between the A330 variants have been assessed at Level B which means that recurrent
training shall be addressed through aided instruction, such as:
slide / tape presentations;
CBT which may be interactive;
video; and/or
classroom instruction.
As a consequence, recurrent training can be conducted on any A330 simulator, provided that the
differences are covered as per the proposed matrix in Annex 2.
7.
Specifications for checking
7.1
Skill test following a type-rating course (transition course)
In addition to the mandatory items from the skill test as per Appendix 2 to of JAR-FCL 1.240, the
following features must be checked:
use of side-stick controller;
knowledge of the various mode of automation;
knowledge and skills related to the use of MCDU/ FCU and crosschecks using the FMA;
use of ECAM; and
use of auto thrust system.
page 15
7.2
Recurrent Checking Checks
Proficiency checks must be conducted in compliance with JAR-FCL 1.245 and EU-OPS 1.965.
The OEB confirms that a proficiency check conducted on one variant is valid for all variants,
provided that the differences have been covered during the recurrent training, as per the enclosed
Table in Annex 2.
Consequently proficiency checks can be conducted on any A330 simulator.
7.3
Line checks
As all A330 variants share same type rating (single licence endorsement), a line check on any of
them is valid for all.
8.
Currency / Recent experience
Compliance with EU-OPS 1.970 or JAR-FCL 1.026, as appropriate, is required for recent
experience.
Concerning the A330 family, the OEB concluded that take-offs and landings performed on one
A330 variant, within ninety days, are valid for all variants. This means that for pilots flying more
than one A330 variant, the recent experience requirement is satisfied as soon as they achieve 3
take-offs and landings, as handling pilot, regardless of the variant flown.
9.
Operational recommendations
The OEB recommends that an operator using more than one A330 variant in his fleet, should,
when possible, use a unique cockpit configuration for the following safety related items:
unit system (metric or non-metric) on all displays;
altimeter settings (QNH/QFE);
callouts; and
FMS specifications and functions (software and hardware).
page 16
10.
Additional operational recommendations specific to the A330-200F
10.1
Categories of occupants accepted in the courier compartment
The A330-200F is a full freighter A330 variant, which presents the particularity to have a Class E
Main Deck Cargo Compartment (MDCC) and a courier compartment forward of the cargo
bulkhead, called the Cabin, which can provide seating for up to 12 occupants (two seat rows of 6
seats).
As the installation of a courier area on an airplane with a class E Cargo compartment is not in
compliance with CS 25.857(e) requirement, EASA has issued a special condition for A330-200F
specific scope of operations.
Operators should therefore incorporate the following recommendations, as highlighted in the AFM:
The total courier occupancy is restricted to 12 persons who are:
(i)
briefed by a flight crew member prior to each flight:

on the use of the emergency escape means (door opening, slide release) and
on preparation for an emergency landing; and
on the location and usage of oxygen equipment (portable and automatic) and
on the procedures to be followed in case of
- a cabin depressurization followed by a descent to a lower level; and
- the application of the MDCC Smoke procedure with acommanded
depressurisation followed by a level flight requiring permanent use of
oxygen masks; and
(ii) physically able to accomplish the necessary emergency procedures.

Access to main deck cargo compartment is not allowed during taxi, takeoff, and landing.
For access in flight, refer to the AFM.
10.2
Aeroplane Search Procedure checklist
In order to comply with the EU-OPS 1.1250 requirement Aeroplane Search Procedure checklist,
operators should incorporate into their operating manual the following procedures:
FCOM Abnormal/Emergency procedures Bomb on Board
10.3
Weight and Balance / Cargo Considerations
The familiarization briefing should emphasize the weight and balance characteristics for the
operation of the A330-200F, including reference to MLW, cg limits, loading and loadsheet
application(s), as well as MDCC cargo securing.
page 17
10.4
Flight Emergency procedure following MDCC Smoke Alert
In case of Main Deck Cargo Smoke Alert, the flight crew should depressurize the cabin at 20,000ft
until safe landing at the nearest diversion airport can be made.
Operators should therefore incorporate into their operating manual the following procedures:
CCOM Abnormal / Emergency procedures
-
Cabin Depressurization
MDCC Smoke
MDCC Depressurization
FCTM Pre Start: Preliminary Cockpit Preparation

FCOM
-
Preliminary Cockpit Preparation
Limitations to cabin occupants
***********************
page 18
Annex 1
Typical Airbus A330 Type Rating Course
Extracted from the Airbus A330 FTCP documentation (GF2S Issue 6, June 2010)
Total working days: 24 days
(Excluding low visibility operations and base training or Zero Flight Time Training)
A. Ground school
Trainees welcome & Welcome briefing
Electronic FCOM (LPC option)
15 days
2:30
1:00
CBT : Aircraft systems presentation
19:00
CBT : Self study
13:00
Performance
7:00
Cabin trainer (optional)
1:00
Systems test & debriefing
4:00
Performance test & debriefing
2:00
APT Trainer A / B / C sessions : 3 x 1 hour
3:00
APT Trainer 1 to 9 sessions : 9 x 4 hours
36:00
APT Trainer 9 debriefing : 0.5 hour
0:30
APPI : Airbus philosophy - SOPs - Pilot Interaction
2:30
B. Handling phase
7 days
Briefings & debriefings
14:00
FFS sessions : 7 x 4 hours
28:00
C. LOFT phase
1 day
Briefing & debriefing
1:30
FFS session : 1 x 4 hours
4:00
D. Skill test phase
1 day
Briefing& debriefing
1:30
4:00
E. Low visibility operations (Optional)
1 day
CBT
4:00
1:30
FFS session 1x3 hours or 4 hours

F. Base training phase
Walk around 3D
3:00 or 4:00
1 day
1:00
Aircraft flight or ZFTT

1:30
4:00
page 19
Annex 2
Airbus A330 Recurrent Training Matrix between variants
A330-200<>A330-300
Differences
Level
Dimensions:
General
Length: -200: 58.4 m
-300: 63.7 m
Height: -200: 17.8 m
-300: 16.8 m
Max passenger capacity:

-200: 375
-300: 440
Max take-off weight (basic)

-200: 230 t (507050 lb) -300: 215 t (473980 lb)
Max landing weight: (basic)
Limitations
Operation
-200: 180 (396800 lb)
-300: 177 t (389400 lb)

B
CG limits:
-200: 17% to 41%
-300: 14% to 42%
For weight, refer to Flight Manual

Taxi: -200:
Decreased distance between nose wheel and main gear
ATA 22
Alerting FMA and Triple click ( if not retrofitted )
On the A330 200 Centre tank is added

Transfer logic ( auto and manual )
Gravity feeding
ATA 28
Control panel: additional Push buttons

Additional ECAM warnings
Jettison ( option )
Depending of engine type ( GE, PW or RR )
Engine parameters
ATA 70
Engine start logic
EPR Fault ( N1 rated or unrated modes )

Relight envelope
page 20
A330-200/-300 Enhanced
ATA
ATA 22
Differences
PITCH TRIM/MCDU/CG DISAGREE caution
Level
B
Electrical rudder
ATA 27
Back up Control Module (BMC ) and associated warnings
Automatic TRIM setting (option)

ATA 29
Automatic activation of the Blue Elec. pump with Engine 1

Failure if aircraft is dispatched with PRIM 3 Fault
PFD,ND and ECAM DUs: new LCD
St By Instruments replaced by ISIS
EGPWS: Peaks mode and new warnings
ATA 31
ATA 34
A330-200/-300 (all) <> A330-200F (Freighter)
ATA
Differences
Level
Safety briefing to be delivered to occupants

On the use of the emergency escape means (door
opening, slide release)
General
A
On the location and usage of oxygen equipment
(portable and automatic)
Preliminary cockpit preparation
MDCC Smoke procedure:
MDCC has no active fire extinguishing equipment.
ATA 26
The fire extinguishing is based in the depressurization of

the main deck.
Fire Smoke/Fumes removal procedure:

New main deck smoke procedure on the ECAM
page 21

A330 OEB Final Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A330 OEB Final Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A330 OEB Final Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY

Operational Evaluation Board Report

Operational Evaluation Board (OEB) OPS / FCL Subgroup

Captain Herbert Meyer

A330 OEB, Revision 01

Scope of the evaluation ............................................................................................... 7

Evaluation Process ..................................................................................................... 7

OEB Report FCL & OPS Subgroup ............................................................................................ 9

Purpose and Applicability ............................................................................................ 9

Pilot Type Rating Requirements ................................................................................. 9

Master Common Requirements .................................................................................. 9

Master Differences Requirements Tables ................................................................. 10

Operator Differences Requirements Tables .............................................................. 11

Specifications for Training .......................................................................................... 11

A330 OEB, Revision 01

A330 OEB, Revision 01

A330 OEB, Revision 01

A330 OEB, Revision 01

Asubsequent A330-200F operational evaluation was conducted by the European Aviation

Scope of the evaluation

Initial evaluation of the A330-200 and A330-300

Subsequent evaluation of the A330-200F

A330 OEB, Revision 01

Initial evaluation of the A330-200 and A330-300

Subsequent evaluation of the A330-200F

Note on references and reference texts:

Operational Evaluation Report FCL & OPS Subgroup

Purpose and Applicability

Pilot Type Rating requirements

Master Common Requirements

A330 OEB, Revision 01

3.2 Aircraft Approach Categories:

Master Differences Requirements tables

n/a means Not Applicable

Difference level definitions Training/Checking/Currency extracted from the CPD:

Level A Currency. At Level A currency is considered to be common to each variant. Thus,

Operator Differences Requirements Tables

Specifications for Training

Initial Type Rating course (transition course)

6.1.1 Area of emphasis

A330 OEB, Revision 01

The following areas of emphasis apply to the entire A330 family:

A330 OEB, Revision 01

Type rating course

Qualification onto A330-200

Qualification onto A330-200F

Qualification onto A330-300

A330 OEB, Revision 01

Line flying under supervision (LIFUS)

6.2 .1 Purpose of LIFUS

Introduction of new aircraft types or variants;

Introduction of new systems (e.g., FMS, TCAS);

Introduction of new operation (e.g. oceanic, polar or ETOPS operations);

Experience for a particular crew position (e.g. PIC, SIC, F/E);

Special characteristics (e.g. airport category in accordance with EU-OPS 1.975,

Familiarization courses and sectors

6.3.1 Familiarization courses

A330 OEB, Revision 01

6.3.2 Familiarization sectors