Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease
1. Introduction
Parkinsonian syndromes are a heterogeneous entity of movement disorders, which can be
subdivided into idiopathic Parkinsons disease, rare genetic forms of Parkinsons disease as
well as symptomatic and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. In addition, a number of other
neurodegenerative disorders may show clinical signs of Parkinsonism. The etiology,
histopathology, clinical manifestation and disease course varies significantly among these
disorders. A correct and early differential diagnosis therefore is essential for proper
prognostic estimation and consultancy of the patient as well as a prerequisite for inclusion
in clinical studies.
This chapter will summarize diagnostic criteria mainly focussing on the diagnosis of
idiopathic Parkinsons disease (iPD) and delineate specific factors to differentiate this
disorder from other disease entities.
2. Clinical signs
Idiopathic Parkinsons disease is a progressive, neurodegenerative movement disorder,
which in its most classical manifestation is characterized by the triad of bradykinesia,
muscular rigidity and tremor. IPD is the most frequent neurodegenerative movement
disorder with a mean prevalence of ~150/100.000 (Errea et al., 1999; Walker et al., 2010). A
definite diagnosis has to be based on histopathological analysis and requires cell loss in the
substantia nigra, the presence of Lewy bodies, which stain for alpha-synuclein and
ubiquitin, and usually can be obtained only post mortem. In addition, the histology has to
exclude histopathological features of other disorders, which could mimick clinical PD, such
as atypical parkinsonian syndromes (Gelb et al., 1999). While these criteria are useful for
post mortem classification, several attempts have been made to define clinical diagnostic
criteria, e.g. by the UK Parkinsons Disease Society Brain Bank (UKPDSBB) (Hughes et al.,
1992) or the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (Gelb et al.,
1999). For clinical practice, the implementation of modified UKPDSBB criteria has proven
useful: here, the diagnosis is based on (1) the identification of parkinsonian symptoms, (2)
the absence of exclusion criteria and (3) the presence of prospective positive criteria
(Table 1). However, it has to be kept in mind, that even if these criteria are verified by expert
www.intechopen.com
neurologists, the diagnostic certainty is only between 75 - 90 % when compared with the
results of the autopsy (Hughes et al., 2001; Dickson et al., 2009).
Step 1 Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome
- Bradykinesia (slowness of initiation of voluntary movement with
progressive reduction in speed and amplitude of repetitive actions)
- and at least one of the following:
- muscular rigidity
- 4-6 Hz rest tremor
- postural instability not caused by primary visual, vestibular,
cerebellar, or proprioceptive dysfunction
Step 2 Exclusion criteria for idiopathic Parkinsons disease
- Repeated strokes with stepwise progression of parkinsonian features
- Repeated head injury
- History of definite encephalitis
- Oculogyric crises
- Neuroleptic treatment at onset of symptoms
- More than one affected relative
- Sustained remission
- Strictly unilateral features after 3 years
- Supranuclear gaze palsy
- Cerebellar signs
- Early severe autonomic involvement
- Early severe dementia with disturbances of memory, language, and praxis
- Babinski sign
- Presence of cerebral tumour or communicating hydrocephalus on CT scan
- Negative response to large doses of levodopa (if malabsorption excluded)
- MPTP exposure
Step 3 Supportive prospective positive criteria for idiopathic Parkinsons disease (Three
or more required for diagnosis of definite Parkinson's disease)
- Unilateral onset
- Rest tremor present
- Progressive disorder
- Persistent asymmetry affecting side of onset most
- Excellent response (70-100%) to levodopa
- Severe levodopa-induced chorea
- Levodopa response for 5 years or more
- Clinical course of 10 years or more
Table 1. UK Parkinsons Disease Society Brain Bank (UKPDSBB) clinical diagnostic criteria
for idiopathic Parkinsons disease (from (Hughes et al., 1992).
Although numerous supplementary technical exams are available, which may increase
diagnostic certainty, the initial diagnosis remains a clinical one and can be based purely on
medical history and clinical examination. Motor symptoms in iPD are clinically most
striking, but a number of less prominent non-motor symptoms may already be present at
www.intechopen.com
www.intechopen.com
2.1.3 Rigidity
Rigidity becomes apparent at the clinical examination, when the passive movement of a
limb is impaired by a wax-like resistance. In combination with the tremor frequency this
results in the cogwheel phenomenon upon passive movement in a joint. Many patients with
iPD initially complain of unilateral back and/or shoulder pain as a consequence of the
asymetric muscular tone, which may result in the consultation of an orthopedic specialist
before final referral to a neurologist (Madden and Hall, 2010).
2.1.4 Postural instability
Postural instability regularly appears in the course of the disease, most often in more
advanced stages (Coelho et al., 2010). In progressive disease it may be considered as
important diagnostic feature and supports the initial diagnosis (Hughes et al., 1992).
However, pronounced postural instability at the initial presentation may be an indicator for
progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) instead of iPD (Litvan et al., 1996) and therefore has to
be carefully set into context with other motor features.
Usually the motor symptoms are asymetrically distributed and in cases with a strict bilateral
presentation one should consider the differential diagnosis of a symptomatic or atypical
parkinsonian syndrome.
2.2 Non-motor symptoms
Since the landmark studies of Braak and colleagues the picture of iPD as a mainly
nigrostriatal disorder is no longer sustainable. In fact, these analyses suggest that the
pathoanatomical changes, such as the presence of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites appear
first in the medulla oblongata, the pons and the olfactory bulb, then spread to the midbrain
and lastly affect the neocortex (Braak et al., 2003). It is no surprise thus, that symptoms
deriving from dysfunction of these brain regions may precede motor symptoms and other
non-motor symptoms may develop in late stage disease.
2.2.1 Olfactory dysfunction
Olfactory dysfunction has been recognized to be an early clinical sign in patients with iPD
and bedside testing can be easily performed by standardized odour test batteries (see part
3.3.1). Approximately 70 - 90 % of all iPD patients present with a significant lack of odour
discrimination and it seems to be present well before the onset of motor symptoms (Doty et
al., 1988; Kranick and Duda, 2008), which could result in a future use of olfactory testing in
combination with other parameters as a biomarker in putative neuroprotective therapies. A
recent study evaluating brain glucose metabolism suggests that hyposmia is related to
cognitive imparment due to cortical dysfunction in iPD patients and that the cognitive
deficit in olfactory perception is at least partially responsible for diminished smell
differentiation. Altered metabolism in the amygdala and the piriform cortex could be
responsible for this sensory deficiency (Baba et al., 2011).
2.2.2 Dysautonomia
Dysautonomic features, such as seborrhoea, orthostatic hypotension, gastrointestinal or
urinary dysfunction may occur before or after the onset of motor symptoms (Bassetti, 2010).
Their early presence (especially urinary dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension) should
however always challenge the diagnosis of iPD and lead to consideration of the differential
diagnosis of atypical parkinsonian syndromes, such as multisystem atrophy (MSA) or
progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) (Colosimo et al., 2010).
www.intechopen.com
Urinary dysfunction is especially debilitating for the patient and usually manifests as
overactive bladder syndrome, which has been attributed to the degeneration of central
serotonergic projections. It correlates with disease severity (measured by the UPDRS-III
score) and patient age (Iacovelli et al., 2010).
Gastrointestinal symptoms are present in more than half of iPD patients and may comprise
constipation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, incomplete bowel emptying or incontinence. As
for other dysautonomic symptoms, the prevalence in atypical parkinsonian syndromes, such
as MSA or PSP, but also in DLB is much higher (Colosimo et al., 2010).
Symptomatic postural hypotension is less frequent in iPD, but ~20 % of the patients show a
drop in systolic blood pressure of more than 20 mmHg associated with postural events
(Senard et al., 1997). If orthostatic hypotension is prominent at initial presentation, the
diagnosis of MSA should be considered.
While above-mentioned symptoms are likely to be verbalized by the patients, sexual
dysfunction is not. Patients may not even be aware of the fact that erectile dysfunction and
loss of libido are part of the non-motory symptom complex observed in iPD and these
symptoms are therefore likely to be underreported. Nevertheless, a recent study analyzing
the most bothersome symptoms reported by iPD patients in early stage disease (up to 6
years disease duration) listed sexual dysfunction at place 12 of 24 and this was similar in late
stage disease patients (Politis et al., 2010).
2.2.3 Depression and anxiety
Neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety are frequently found alongside
with motor symptoms - approximately 40 % of all iPD patients show anxiety-related,
depressive or combined psychopathology (Brown et al., 2011). A recently published analysis
demonstrates a positive correlation between depression and higher UPDRS/Hoehn and
Yahr stages. Also, other non-motor symptoms, such as anxiety, hallucinations and sleep
disturbances were more frequently observed in depressed iPD patients (Dissanayaka et al.,
2011). Disease severity in iPD has also been shown to be positively correlated with anxiety
and patients with young onset, gait dysfunction and postural instability were especially
prone to develop an anxiety disorder (Dissanayaka et al., 2010)
2.2.4 Cognitive decline and dementia
About 40 % of all patients initially diagnosed with iPD will develop cognitive decline with
dementia in the course of the disease (Aarsland et al., 2001). According to the current
diagnostic criteria, the occurence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with parkinsonian
symptoms later than 12 months after the first presentation of motor symptoms is considered
as Parkinsons disease dementia. When cognitive decline occurs before or within the first
year of motor symptom onset, dementia with Lewy-bodies (DLB) has to be diagnosed rather
then iPD (McKeith et al., 1996). Because of their histopathological similarities, it is likely that
iPD and DLB are not separate entities, but different manifestations within the spectrum of
disorders, which are defined by the presence of pathologic alpha-synuclein aggregates, socalled alpha-synucleinopathies. The neuropsychological examination for Parkinsons disease
dementia should include specific scales which should be powered to detect cortical
dysfunction. For example, the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson's disease-Cognition
(SCOPA-COG), Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS), and Parkinson
Neuropsychometric Dementia Assessment (PANDA) are likely to yield a more precise
assessment of the patients cognitive dysfunction than general dementia assessments
(Kulisevsky and Pagonabarraga, 2009).
www.intechopen.com
3. Additional exams
Although the diagnosis of iPD can be made based purely on clinical examination, additional
technical exams can help to differentiate other degenerative disorders, most importantly
secondary or atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
3.1 Imaging approaches
3.1.1 MRI
There are currently no MRI-criteria in clinical use for the verification of a putative iPD
diagnosis. No single morphological marker could be identified permitting the diagnosis of
iPD, even though several parameters exist, which help to differentiate iPD from atypical
parkinsonian syndromes. Recent approaches combining different magnetic resonance
parameters (such as R2* value, mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy) have been shown
to achieve a high accuracy for the discrimination of iPD patients and controls (Pran et al.,
www.intechopen.com
2010). It remains to be seen whether similar techniques find application in the clinical
practice and whether they will be able to separate other entities from iPD.
Nevertheless, conventional CT and MRI imaging has its place in the diagnostic workup for
suspected iPD and is widely used to exclude common differential diagnoses, such as
vascular PD, Wilsons disease, or atypical parkinsonian syndromes (see section 4).
3.1.2 SPECT imaging
Imaging with radiolabeled ligands has markedly improved the functional diagnostics of
Parkinsons disease. PET and SPECT techniques permit to visualize the pre- and
postsynaptic compartment of the nigrostriatal projections and thus draw a semiquantitative
picture about functionality of these pathways. In clinical use, they are mostly used for the
differentiation of iPD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes or from essential tremor (ET).
The dopaminergic deficit can be quantified by a DAT-SPECT (DaTSCAN) using [123I]-FP-CIT
and is a measure for the presynaptic dopamine transporter in the striatal dopaminergic
synapse (Booij et al., 1997). The DaTSCAN should be used, if the dopaminergic deficit itself is
clinically unclear, i.e. too subtle, or if tremor is the prominent symptom, which makes the
discrimination between iPD and ET difficult (Benamer et al., 2000). The DaTSCAN also
correlates with the rate of dopaminergic degeneration in the course of the disease
(Winogrodzka et al., 2001) and, similarly to the clinical presentation, the signal reduction is
usually found with a unilateral preference. With further progression and degeneration in later
disease stages signal reduction appears bilaterally (Fig. 1a). According to a study of 122
patients with iPD, the DaTSCAN shows different patterns in tremor-dominant versus akineticrigid iPD (Eggers et al., 2011). Unfortunately, the [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT does not reliably
distinguish iPD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes, such as MSA, PSP, CBD and a similar
nigrostriatal deficit is also detected in LBD (Pirker et al., 2000; Kgi et al., 2010). Other imaging
techniques focussing on the D2-receptor expression are more useful to answer this question.
As mentioned earlier, autonomic denervation is an early phenomenon in iPD and [123I]-MIBG
scintigraphy is a mean to visualize the postganglionic, presynaptic sympathetic terminals.
www.intechopen.com
al., 2006). Due to better sensitivity and the correlation to clinical progression the DaTSCAN
currently may be more suitable in the early diagnosis of iPD than [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy.
SPECT imaging also allows quantifying the postsynaptic dopamine receptor status, which can
be helpful in the differentiation of iPD and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. D2 receptors can
be imaged by application of [123I]-IBZM or [123I]-IBF and are decreased in atypical parkinsonian
syndromes, such as MSA or PSP, but normal or even upregulated in early iPD (Kim et al.,
2002) (Fig. 1b). Imaging techniques aiming at the visualization of cerebral blood flow, such as
[99mTc]-ECD (so-called Neurolite) or FDG, can help in the identification of corticobasal
degeneration, where an asymmetrical reduction of perfusion in cortical areas can be revealed
(Hossain et al., 2003) and discriminate towards PSP (Zhang et al., 2001).
Non-dopaminergic functions are also accessible to PET and SPECT imaging, although these
examinations are not performed routinely. For example, the 11C-WAY100635 PET can
visualize reduced serotonin receptor expression in iPD, which has been suggested to play a
role in iPD-associated depression, and evaluation of 11C-PK11195 binding by PET
examination reflects microglial activation associated with iPD (Brooks, 2007).
3.1.3 Transcranial ultrasound
Transcranial ultrasound has meanwhile become a standard exam for the initial bedside
diagnostics in suspected iPD. Since the first description of hyperechogenicity in the
substantia nigra in iPD patients (Becker et al., 1995) a large number of studies confirmed
these findings demonstrating that these alterations occur in more than two thirds of all iPD
patients and that substantia nigra hyperechogenicity is detectable in a very early stage of
disease (Fig. 2). Although the histopathological correlate of this alteration is still a matter of
debate, there is evidence to suggest that increased iron deposition and/or microglial
activation is responsible for this phenomenon. As in each ultrasound examination, the
quantification and quality of the readout depends highly on the skill of the examiner, but as
recent studies have shown, reproducibility in experienced sonographers is high (van de Loo
et al., 2010). Because 10 % of healthy controls also show hyperechogenicity in the substantia
nigra (Berg et al., 2001), the ultrasound may not serve as a screening method for a general
population, but rather as a supporting exam in suspected iPD.
Fig. 2. Transcranial B-Mode sonography of the midbrain (purple dotted line). Controls show
little to no hyperechogenicity (white dotted line) in the substantia nigra (a) as compared to
markedly increased hyperechogenicity in iPD patients (b).
www.intechopen.com
www.intechopen.com
10
iPD (Srulijes et al., 2011). Also, tremor is the symptom, which is most resistant to
dopaminergic therapy and therefore may result only in an insufficient response.
4. Differential diagnosis
In the following part of this chapter, a number of clinically relevant differential diagnoses
are discussed. The main clinical differences are presented along with the appropriate
diagnostic tools for the discrimination against iPD.
4.1 Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)
As one of the most frequent atypical parkinsonian syndroms, PSP belongs to the group of
so-called tauopathies, disorders which are characterized by pathological processing of the
tau protein. Compared to iPD, PSP is still quite rare (1-6/100.000 inhabitants) (Schrag et al.,
1999; Nath et al., 2001). Clinically, at least two distinct variants can be differentiated: PSPparkinsonism (PSP-P) and the Richardsons syndrome (RS). While PSP-P initially may
present with typical iPD-features, such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and even a
temporary response to dopaminergic medication, other symptoms, such as the supranuclear
vertical gaze palsy, postural instability and cognitive decline take center place in the later
course of the disease (Litvan et al., 1996). In RS (the original syndrome described by
Richardson in 1963) these additional symptoms are present in the very beginning of the
disease (Richardson et al., 1963). The protracted appearance of these additional symptoms in
PSP-P may complicate the diagnosis and its no surprise that less than 50 % of pathologically
verified PSP-cases are not diagnosed correctly at their first visit (Osaki et al., 2004).
Fig. 3. Characteristic MRI findings in PSP and MSA. Thinning of cerebral peduncles
(Mickey mouse sign) (a) and mesencephalic atrophy (hummingbird sign) (b) on T2weighted images in PSP. Cerebellar and pontine atrophy (c), hyperintense putaminal rim (d)
and degeneration of pontocerebellar projections (hot cross bun sign) (e) as observed on
T2-weighted images in patients with MSA.
www.intechopen.com
11
www.intechopen.com
12
Fig. 4. Characteristic MRI findings in CBD. Asymmetric frontoparietal cortical atrophy with
an emphasis on the central region in a conventional T1-weighted axial section (a), curved
planar reformation or pancake representation of the cortex (b) or paramedian sagittal T2weighted image (c).
Focal or asymmetric cortical atrophy with a frontoparietal preference may be present on
MRI (Fig. 4) and a corresponding hypoperfusion/hypometabolism may be detected by
SPECT/PET (see section 3.1.2).
4.4 Essential tremor (ET)
A positive family history, clinical responsivity to beta-blockers and small doses of alcohol
suggests the presence of ET. Rest tremor is unusual in ET and the manifestation is mostly as
a symmetrical, postural and kinetic tremor (Bain et al., 2000). Since tremor may be one of the
first and sometimes solitary symptoms at initial presentation of iPD, differential diagnosis
may be difficult.
DaTSCAN analysis should usually be able to differentiate versus iPD by exclusion of a
striatal dopaminergic deficit, but a clinical overlap has been suggested and it is still
controversial whether at least a subgroup of ET patients may develop iPD and vice versa
(Quinn et al., 2010).
4.5 Lewy-body dementia (LBD)
Histopathology suggests that LBD and iPD may indeed be very similar disorders and
probably can be considered as a neuropathological spectrum of an alpha-synucleinopathy
with Lewy bodies (Jellinger, 2009). As the name suggests, cognitive decline is the primary
feature in LBD and per definition must be present before the onset of motor
dysfunctions, which most frequently present as bradykinesia and rigidity. The clinical
challenge is the separation from Parkinsons disease dementia, which may occur in up to 40
% of all iPD patients (see section 2.2.4). The term Parkinsons disease dementia should only
be used when dementia occurs at least 12 months after onset of motor symptoms in iPD,
which however is an arbitrary cut-off. According to consensus criteria, LBD patients show
also pronounced fluctuations in cognition and attention. Also, optical hallucinations can
occur and patients can display a marked sensitivity to neuroleptic treatment (McKeith et al.,
1996; McKeith et al., 2005).
4.6 Vascular parkinsonism
It is now widely acknowledged that white matter changes observed in arteriosclerotic disease,
e.g. due to long history of arterial hypertension, may be associated with the presentation of
parkinsonian-like features. However, there are no commonly-accepted diagnostic criteria,
www.intechopen.com
13
which may be due to the heterogeneity of this disorder as well as a possible coincidence of
vascular changes and iPD. Clinically, patients may present with a slowly progressive difficulty
of gait, while the upper extremities usually are less affected thus the term lower-body
parkinsonism. Tremor is less frequent, but patients may show a multitude of additional
symptoms, such as corticospinal tract signs, pseudobulbar palsy, dementia or incontinence,
depending on the distribution of the microvascular alterations (systematically reviewed in
(Kalra et al., 2010). Rarely, symptoms occur abruptly after an ischemic incidence (Alarcn et
al., 2004). Response to dopaminergic therapy usually is limited.
In contrast to iPD, the native CT scan and the MRI may be helpful in the identification of
vascular lesions and a history of arteriosclerosis, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk
factors may be indicative.
4.7 Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)
Because of the therapeutic consequences arising from the diagnosis of NPH and its
relatively high prevalence, it is of high clinical relevance to differentiate this disorder from
iPD. Recent estimates of the prevalence with ~22/100.000 inhabitants are very likely
understated (Brean and Eide, 2008). Cognitive decline up to dementia as well as urinary
incontinence in combination with a gait disturbance build the classical triad of symptoms
initially described by Hakim and Adams (Hakim and Adams, 1965). Not all patients,
however, present with all three symptoms at the initial visit, which may delay diagnosis. In
addition, the slow, shuffling and broad-based gait shows striking similarities to the one
observed in iPD (Bugalho and Guimares, 2007).
Enlarged ventricles can be observed on CT or MRI scans (Fig. 5) and the diagnostics should
be followed by a large-volume lumbar puncture. Structured analysis of gait and cognitive
function has to be performed before and after taking CSF. An improvement, which is most
likely to occur in the gait analysis, favours the diagnosis of NPH and permits to identify
patients, who will benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting (Bergsneider et al., 2005).
www.intechopen.com
14
The prognosis of drug-induced Parkinsonism is rather good as most patients recover after
discontinuation of medication. If parkinsonian symptoms are not reversible, one should
consider the presence of iPD, which has been unmasked by the anti-dopaminergic medication.
4.9 Other differential diagnoses
In addition to the above-mentioned disorders, there are a number of less frequent causes for
parkinsonian syndromes. Because basically any kind of lesion to the extrapyramidal system
can potentially result in a parkinsonian presentation, the list of possible etiologies cannot be
complete. Some of them have been listed as exclusion criterion in the UKPDSBB clinical
diagnostic criteria, for example repeated head trauma, history of encephalitis, cerebral
tumour or MPTP exposure (see Table 1). Other neurodegenerative (Huntingtons disease,
spinocerebellar ataxia, frontotemporal dementia), neurometabolic (Wilsons disease, Fahrs
disease, hypoxia) or toxin-induced (occupational manganese exposure, carbon monoxide
intoxication) disorders can also present with signs of parkinsonism, even though usually
other symptoms are additionally present (reviewed in (Tolosa et al., 2006)).
6. Summary
The diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinsons disease is mainly based on clinical criteria of motor
symptoms, such as bradykinesia, tremor and rigidity.
If these are met, other signs of atypical and secondary parkinsonian syndromes, for example
MSA, PSP, CBD, vascular parkinsonism, NPH or LBD have to be excluded. In addition to
clinical signs typical of these disorders, auxiliary exams, including olfactory testing, MRI
and SPECT imaging can help to identify these entities.
www.intechopen.com
15
Finally, the diagnosis of iPD is supported by prospective criteria, which have to be met
during the course of the disease, such as levodopa response, asymmetric symptoms and
disease progression.
There is no single reliable biomarker for iPD available yet and a definite diagnosis currently
can be made only by histology.
7. References
Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Nielsen H, Kragh-Srensen P (2001) Risk of
dementia in Parkinsons disease: a community-based, prospective study.
Neurology 56:730-6
Abbott RD, Ross GW, White LR, Tanner CM, Masaki KH, Nelson JS, Curb JD, Petrovitch H
(2005) Excessive daytime sleepiness and subsequent development of Parkinson
disease. Neurology 65:1442-6
Alarcn F, Zijlmans JCM, Dueas G, Cevallos N (2004) Post-stroke movement disorders:
report of 56 patients. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 75:1568-74
Alcalay RN et al. (2010) Frequency of known mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease:
implication for genetic counseling: the consortium on risk for early onset Parkinson
disease study. Archives of neurology 67:1116-22
Baba T, Takeda A, Kikuchi A, Nishio Y, Hosokai Y, Hirayama K, Hasegawa T, Sugeno N,
Suzuki K, Mori E, Takahashi S, Fukuda H, Itoyama Y (2011) Association of
olfactory dysfunction and brain. Metabolism in Parkinsons disease. Movement
disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
Bain P, Brin M, Deuschl G, Elble R, Jankovic J, Findley L, Koller WC, Pahwa R (2000)
Criteria for the diagnosis of essential tremor. Neurology 54:S7
Bassetti CL (2010) Nonmotor Disturbances in Parkinsons Disease. Neuro-degenerative
diseases
Becker G, Seufert J, Bogdahn U, Reichmann H, Reiners K (1995) Degeneration of substantia
nigra in chronic Parkinsons disease visualized by transcranial color-coded realtime sonography. Neurology 45:182-4
Benamer TS et al. (2000) Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using
visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group.
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 15:503-10
Berg D, Siefker C, Becker G (2001) Echogenicity of the substantia nigra in Parkinsons
disease and its relation to clinical findings. Journal of neurology 248:684-9
Bergsneider M, Black PM, Klinge P, Marmarou A, Relkin N (2005) Surgical management of
idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:S29-39; discussion ii-v
Boelmans K, Bodammer NC, Suchorska B, Kaufmann J, Ebersbach G, Heinze H-J, Niehaus L
(2010) Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum differentiates corticobasal
syndrome from Parkinsons disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders 16:498-502
Booij J, Tissingh G, Winogrodzka A, Boer GJ, Stoof JC, Wolters EC, Royen EA van (1997)
Practical benefit of [123I]FP-CIT SPET in the demonstration of the dopaminergic
deficit in Parkinsons disease. European journal of nuclear medicine 24:68-71
Borroni B, Malinverno M, Gardoni F, Alberici A, Parnetti L, Premi E, Bonuccelli U, Grassi M,
Perani D, Calabresi P, Di Luca M, Padovani A (2008) Tau forms in CSF as a reliable
biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 71:1796-803
Braak H, Tredici KD, Vos RAID, Steur ENHJ, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology
related to sporadic Parkinsons disease. Neurobiology of Aging 24:197-211
www.intechopen.com
16
www.intechopen.com
17
www.intechopen.com
18
PD, MSA, and PSP. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement
Disorder Society 17:303-12
Kranick SM, Duda JE (2008) Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinsons disease. Neuro-Signals
16:35-40
Kulisevsky J, Pagonabarraga J (2009) Cognitive impairment in Parkinsons disease: tools for
diagnosis and assessment. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement
Disorder Society 24:1103-10
Kgi G, Bhatia KP, Tolosa E (2010) The role of DAT-SPECT in movement disorders. Journal
of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 81:5-12
Lee EA, Cho HI, Kim SS, Lee WY (2004) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging in
subtypes of multiple system atrophy. Parkinsonism & related disorders 10:363-8
Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, Goetz CG, Golbe LI,
Grafman J, Growdon JH, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Quinn NP, Tolosa E, Zee DS (1996)
Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy
(Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international
workshop. Neurology 47:1-9
Loo S van de, Walter U, Behnke S, Hagenah J, Lorenz M, Sitzer M, Hilker R, Berg D (2010)
Reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of substantia nigra sonography for the
diagnosis of Parkinsons disease. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and
psychiatry 81:1087-92
Lunardi G, Galati S, Tropepi D, Moschella V, Brusa L, Pierantozzi M, Stefani A, Rossi S,
Fornai F, Fedele E, Stanzione P, Hainsworth AH, Pisani A (2009) Correlation
between changes in CSF dopamine turnover and development of dyskinesia in
Parkinsons disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders 15:383-9
Madden MB, Hall DA (2010) Shoulder pain in Parkinsons disease: a case-control study.
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 25:1105-6
Matsui H, Nishinaka K, Oda M, Komatsu K, Kubori T, Udaka F (2006) Does cardiac
metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake in Parkinsons disease correlate with
major autonomic symptoms? Parkinsonism & related disorders 12:284-8
McKeith IG et al. (2005) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third
report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 65:1863-72
McKeith IG et al. (1996) Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of
dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international
workshop. Neurology 47:1113-24
Mollenhauer B, Locascio JJ, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Sixel-Dring F, Trenkwalder C, Schlossmacher
MG (2011) -Synuclein and tau concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of patients
presenting with parkinsonism: a cohort study. Lancet neurology 10:230-40
Morley JF, Duda JE (2010) Olfaction as a biomarker in Parkinsons disease. Biomarkers in
medicine 4:661-70
Mller A, Mngersdorf M, Reichmann H, Strehle G, Hummel T (2002) Olfactory function in
Parkinsonian syndromes. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the
Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 9:521-4
Nath U, Ben-Shlomo Y, Thomson RG, Morris HR, Wood NW, Lees AJ, Burn DJ (2001) The
prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski
syndrome) in the UK. Brain : a journal of neurology 124:1438-49
Oba H, Yagishita A, Terada H, Barkovich AJ, Kutomi K, Yamauchi T, Furui S, Shimizu T,
Uchigata M, Matsumura K, Sonoo M, Sakai M, Takada K, Harasawa A, Takeshita
K, Kohtake H, Tanaka H, Suzuki S (2005) New and reliable MRI diagnosis for
progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 64:2050-5
www.intechopen.com
19
Osaki Y, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees AJ, Daniel SE, Colosimo C, Wenning G, Quinn N (2004)
Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. Movement
disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 19:181-9
Pirker W, Asenbaum S, Bencsits G, Prayer D, Gerschlager W, Deecke L, Brcke T (2000)
[123I]beta-CIT SPECT in multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy,
and corticobasal degeneration. Movement disorders : official journal of the
Movement Disorder Society 15:1158-67
Politis M, Wu K, Molloy S, G Bain P, Chaudhuri KR, Piccini P (2010) Parkinsons disease
symptoms: the patient's perspective. Movement disorders : official journal of the
Movement Disorder Society 25:1646-51
Plhagen S, Qi H, Mrtensson B, Wlinder J, Granrus A-K, Svenningsson P (2010)
Monoamines, BDNF, IL-6 and corticosterone in CSF in patients with Parkinsons
disease and major depression. Journal of neurology 257:524-32
Pran P, Cherubini A, Assogna F, Piras F, Quattrocchi C, Peppe A, Celsis P, Rascol O,
Dmonet J-F, Stefani A, Pierantozzi M, Pontieri FE, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G,
Sabatini U (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging markers of Parkinsons disease
nigrostriatal signature. Brain : a journal of neurology 133:3423-33
Quinn NP, Schneider SA, Schwingenschuh P, Bhatia KP (2010) Tremor-some controversial
aspects. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
Raethjen J, Deuschl G (2009) Tremor. Current opinion in neurology 22:400-5
Reichmann H (2010) Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinsons disease. Neurodegenerative diseases 7:284-90
Richardson JC, Steele J, Olszewski J (1963) SUPRANUCLEAR OPHTHALMOPLEGIA,
PSEUDOBULBAR PALSY, NUCHAL DYSTONIA AND DEMENTIA. A CLINICAL
REPORT ON EIGHT CASES OF "HETEROGENOUS SYSTEM DEGENERATION".
Transactions of the American Neurological Association 88:25-9
Rinne JO, Lee MS, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1994) Corticobasal degeneration. A clinical
study of 36 cases. Brain : a journal of neurology 117 ( Pt 5:1183-96
Savica R, Rocca WA, Ahlskog JE (2010) When does Parkinson disease start? Archives of
neurology 67:798-801
Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn NP (1999) Prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy
and multiple system atrophy: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 354:1771-5
Senard JM, Ra S, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Brefel C, Rascol O, Rascol A, Montastruc JL (1997)
Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in Parkinsons disease. Journal of neurology,
neurosurgery, and psychiatry 63:584-9
Seppi K, Schocke MFH, Donnemiller E, Esterhammer R, Kremser C, Scherfler C, Diem A,
Jaschke W, Wenning GK, Poewe W (2004) Comparison of diffusion-weighted
imaging and [123I]IBZM-SPECT for the differentiation of patients with the
Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy from those with Parkinsons disease.
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 19:1438-45
Shulman JM, De Jager PL, Feany MB (2010) Parkinsons Disease: Genetics and Pathogenesis.
Annual review of pathology 6:193-222
Srulijes K, Mallien G, Bauer S, Dietzel E, Grger A, Ebersbach G, Berg D, Maetzler W (2011)
In vivo comparison of Richardsons syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsyparkinsonism. Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)
Susatia F, Fernandez HH (2009) Drug-induced parkinsonism. Current treatment options in
neurology 11:162-9
Tokuda T, Qureshi MM, Ardah MT, Varghese S, Shehab SAS, Kasai T, Ishigami N, Tamaoka
A, Nakagawa M, El-Agnaf OMA (2010) Detection of elevated levels of {alpha}-
www.intechopen.com
20
www.intechopen.com
ISBN 978-953-307-465-8
Hard cover, 264 pages
Publisher InTech
How to reference
In order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:
Paul Lingor, Jan Liman, Kai Kallenberg, Carsten-Oliver Sahlmann and Mathias Bahr (2011). Diagnosis and
Differential Diagnosis of Parkinsons Disease, Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease, Prof. Abdul
Qayyum Rana (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-465-8, InTech, Available from:
http://www.intechopen.com/books/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-parkinson-s-disease/diagnosis-and-differentialdiagnosis-of-parkinson-s-disease
InTech Europe
InTech China