Surface & Coatings Technology: A. Rico, J. Gómez-García, C.J. Múnez, P. Poza, V. Utrilla
Surface & Coatings Technology: A. Rico, J. Gómez-García, C.J. Múnez, P. Poza, V. Utrilla
Surface & Coatings Technology: A. Rico, J. Gómez-García, C.J. Múnez, P. Poza, V. Utrilla
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 September 2008
Accepted in revised form 22 February 2009
Available online 1 March 2009
Keywords:
Thermal barrier coatings (TBC)
Mechanical properties
Isothermal oxidation
Sensing indentation (nanoindentation)
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
a b s t r a c t
Thermal barrier coatings (TBC) are extensively used to protect metallic components in applications where
the operating conditions include aggressive environment at high temperatures. Isothermal oxidation
degrades the performance of these coatings, so this work analyses the mechanical properties (Young's
modulus, E, and hardness, H) of TBC and its evolution after thermal exposure in air. ZrO2(Y2O3) top coat and
NiCrAlY bond coating were air plasma sprayed onto an Inconel 600 Ni base alloy. The TBC were isothermally
oxidized in air at 950 C and 1050 C for 72, 144 and 336 h. Depth sensing indentation tests were carried out
on the ceramic coating to evaluate E and H in the as-sprayed materials and after isothermal oxidation. An
approach based on multiple tests at different loads was used to determine size independent apparent E an H.
These mechanical properties, measured perpendicular to the surface, clearly decreased after isothermal
oxidation as a consequence of microcracking within the ceramic coating.
2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Thermal barrier coatings (TBC) are widely used in turbine engines for
propulsion and power generation where materials capable of withstanding increasing operating temperatures, mechanical loads and
chemical degradation are required. The aim of these coatings is to
insulate the metallic components from the aggressive environment and
to provide the opportunity of increasing turbine entry gas temperature,
which promotes overall engine efciency. TBC comprise at least two
layers: a ceramic top coating and a metallic bond coat [17].
ZrO2 coatings, in which the high temperature cubic phase is
partially stabilised relative to the lower temperature monoclinic phase
by the addition of typically 8% Y2O3, are widely used in TBC. Partially
stabilised zirconia (PSZ) has the required low thermal conductivity
(0.81.5 W m 1 K 1) together with a relatively high coefcient of
thermal expansion (CTE) of 71010 6 K 1 [8]. This value, although
higher than the CTEs usually found in ceramic materials, is smaller than
the typical CTE for the load bearing metals (approximately 1510 6 K 1
for Ni based alloys or superalloys). Consequently, the direct use of a PSZ
layer onto a metallic component is problematic because the CTE mismatch
between the ceramic coating and the metallic substrate generates high
interfacial shear stresses during coating manufacture and in-service
thermal cycling that leads ceramic failure by spalling. To reduce these
problems arising from CTE mismatch and to protect the metallic
component from chemical attack (ZrO2 is permeable to oxygen and
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 914 887 179; fax: +34 914 888 150.
E-mail address: pedro.poza@urjc.es (P. Poza).
0257-8972/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.035
2308
The TBC were air plasma sprayed (APS) onto a nickel-base alloy,
Inconel 600 (Ni 16Cr 8Fe, wt.%). AMDRY 962 (Ni 22Cr 10Al 1 Y, wt.%)
and METCO 204, (ZrO2 8Y2O3, wt.%) powders were used for the bond
coat and for the top coating, respectively. The sprayed samples were
supplied by REMESA (Recargues y Mecanizados, S.A.; Gijn-Spain).
Some of the coated materials were oxidised in air at 950 C and
1050 C for 72, 144, and 336 h, in a furnace (AGNI FHT 4/165).
Metallographic samples from the as-sprayed and oxidized coatings
were prepared in the longitudinal section, parallel to the spraying
direction. The samples were cut with a diamond saw and grinded using
1200 grit SiC paper. This was followed by polishing in a diamond slurry
up to a 1 m nish. Care was taken to reduce polishing times and
pressures to minimize enlarging any surface porosity or the excessive
removal any poorly bonded regions of the coating (commonly referred
to as pull-out). Polished surfaces were cleaned in deionized water,
and afterward by ultrasound in acetone and propanol. The microstructure was observed in a LEICA DMR optical microscope and it was
also analysed by electron microscopy. A JEOL JSM-6300 scanning
electron microscope (SEM), and a Philips XL30, environmental
scanning electron microscope (ESEM) were used. Both were equipped
with energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX). Secondary (SEI)
2309
Fig. 4. a) BEI showing oxidation within the NiCrAlY and at the bond coattop coat interface
in the TBC oxidized at 950 C for 144 h. b) BEI showing the TGO at the bond coattop coat
interface in the TBC oxidized at 950 C for 72 h. c) EDX prole corresponding to the TGO. Al,
Cr and O peaks are clearly shown suggesting Al2O3 and Cr2O3 formation.
even for those corresponding to the maximum load used (Fig. 1b),
and the indentations were placed inside the splats. Young's modulus
and hardness could be estimated from the loaddisplacement curve
using the Oliver and Pharr method [24,25] for a Berkovich indenter
according to the following expressions:
Fig. 3. a) BEI of the as-sprayed NiCrAlY bond coat. Porosity and dark oxidized areas are
marked. b) EDX prole corresponding to the oxidized areas with a grey contrast. Al, Cr
and O peaks are clearly shown suggesting Al2O3 and Cr2O3 formation.
H=
Pmax
A
2310
Table 1
TGO thickness after isothermal oxidation.
Exposure time (h)
72
144
336
2.3
2.5
2.8
2.7
2.8
3.0
where, Pmax, is the maximum load and A the projected area of contact
at maximum load. On the other hand,
p
1 1
E = S p
2 A
dP
dh h = ht
diamond indenter and was considered 0.28 for the ceramic coating. In
the preceding expressions, the projected contact area, A, is evaluated
through the indenter shape function, A=A(hp), a relationship between A
and the contact depth, hp (A=24.5 h2p for an ideal Berkovich tip). Finally,
this last magnitude can be calculated from the expression:
hp = ht e
Pmax
S
1
1 2
1 V
+
=
E
EV
E
Fig. 5. a) SEI of the TGO at the bond coattop coat interface in the TBC oxidized at 1050 C
for 336 h. Top coat spallation and cracking within the ceramic coating are shown. b) SEI
showing microcracking within the top coat in the TBC oxidized at 950 C for 144 h.
Fig. 6. Quantication of cracking within the top coating, close the bond coat (zone 1)
and at the middle of the ceramic coating (zone 2). a) Optical image treated for cracking
measurement. b) Crack density as a function of exposure time.
2311
3. Results
3.1. Microstructure
The TBC system (Fig. 2) comprised a 150 m thick NiCrAlY bond
coat and a 300 m thick Y-PSZ top coating. The as-sprayed
microstructure of both coatings was inhomogeneous containing thin
and large splats associated with the deposition of individual molten
droplets, with porosity between splats, and un-melted particles
(Fig. 3a). The bond coat microstructure was mainly formed by Ni
splats which contained Cr, Al, and Y. Dark areas reach in O with Al, Cr
and some Y were observed next to splats suggesting the formation of
Al2O3, Cr2O3 and possibly Y2O3 during spraying (Fig. 3b).
During thermal exposure the bond coat was oxidized and those dark
areas observed between the splats were increased, indicating oxygen
penetrated through the interconnected porosity up to the bond coat
(Fig. 4a). As it was expected, a TGO layer (Fig. 4b), mainly formed by Al
and Cr according to EDX analysis (Fig. 4c), grew between the NiCrAlY
bond coat and the ceramic coating. Fig. 4b shows a detail of the TGO
formed in the TBC treated at 950 C for 72 h. TGO thickness was 2.3 m
and it increased up to 2.8 m after oxidation for 336 h at 950 C. As
expected, TGO thickness, after the same oxidation time, was higher at
1050 C than at 950 C as it is shown in Table 1. As a consequence of TGO
Fig. 8. Mechanical properties vs. total penetration depth for the as sprayed and oxidized
samples. a) Young's modulus. b) Hardness.
Fig. 7. Loaddisplacement curves. a) As sprayed coating. b) TBC oxidized at 1050 C for 366 h.
2312
Table 2
Linear ts obtained from Fig. 9a.
S = M + N hp
T (C)
t (h)
950
M (mN nm 1)
N (mN nm 2)
0.096
0.111
0.087
0.076
0.082
0.090
0.117
8.81 10 4
8.40 10 4
7.74 10 4
8.63 10 4
6.96 10 4
5.23 10 4
9.45 10 4
0.99800
0.99812
0.99843
0.99815
0.99849
0.99677
0.99444
72
144
336
72
144
336
As sprayed
1050
r
24:5
hp
Pmax = HA
Therefore, H is the slope of the PmaxA plots which are shown in Fig. 9b.
The experimental data arrange in a linear t making possible to determine
characteristic mechanical properties that are independent from indentation size. Table 3 includes the linear t parameters from Fig. 9b. Table 4
summarizes the size independent properties, E and H, obtained from
Fig. 9 for the as-sprayed and oxidized samples. Apparent Young's modulus
decreased from 190 GPa in the as-sprayed condition to 93 GPa after 336 h
at 1050 C. Similarly, apparent hardness decreased from 11.4 GPa in the assprayed condition to 7.1 GPa after 336 h at 1050 C. These results clearly
Table 3
Linear ts obtained from Fig. 9b.
P=U+V A
T (C)
950
1050
t (h)
U (mN)
72
144
336
72
144
336
As sprayed
V (mN m 2)
10.77
9.07
8.52
10.00
8.09
7.13
11.37
0.99990
0.99970
0.99968
0.99985
0.99996
0.99990
0.99982
3.26
5.37
5.42
3.95
2.52
2.97
3.80
Table 4
Independent size E and H of the as sprayed and oxidized top coatings.
T (C)
950
1050
Fig. 9. a) Slope of the unload branch of the loaddisplacement curve, S, vs. the contact
depth, hp, for the as sprayed and oxidized samples. b) Maximum load of indentation,
Pmax, vs. the contact area, A, for the as sprayed and oxidized samples.
t (h)
72
144
336
72
144
336
As sprayed
E (GPa)
168
160
144
164
130
93
190
H (GPa)
10.8
9.1
8.5
10.0
8.3
7.1
11.4
2313
Fig. 10. a) Ratio between the independent size Young's modulus of the oxidized samples, E,
and the independent size Young's modulus of the as sprayed sample, E0, vs. exposure time.
b) Ratio between the independent size hardness of the oxidized samples, H, and the
independent size hardness of the as sprayed sample, H0, vs. exposure time.
2314
[8] W.E. Lee, W.M. Rainforth, Ceramic microstructures, Chapman and Hall, London,
1994.
[9] P. Poza, P.S. Grant, Surf. Coat. Tech. 201 (2006) 2887.
[10] A.G. Evans, D.R. Mumm, J.W. Hutchinson, G.H. Meier, F.S. Pettit, Prog. Mater. Sci. 46
(2001) 505.
[11] A.G. Evans, M.Y. He, J.W. Hutchinson, Prog. Mater. Sci. 46 (2001) 249.
[12] M. Ahrens, R. Vaen, D. Stver, Surf. Coat. Technol. 161 (2002) 26.
[13] X. Wang, G. Lee, A. Atkinson, Acta Mater. 57 (2009) 182.
[14] M. Bialas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 6002.
[15] R. Vaen, G. Kerchoff, D. Stver, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 303 (2001) 100.
[16] J.A. Thompson, T.W. Clyne, Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 1565.
[17] F. Tang, J.M. Shoenung, Scripta Mater. 54 (2006) 1587.
[18] J.Y. Kwon, K.H. Dong, J.H. Lee, Y.G. Jung, U. Paik, C.Y. Jo, Prog. Org. Coat. 61 (2008)
300.
[19] J. Lian, J.E. Garay, J. Wang, Scripta Mater. 56 (2007) 1095.
[20] C.C. Raceck, Berndt, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2007) 362.
[21] S. Guo, Y. Kagawa, Ceram. Int. 32 (2006) 263.
[22] J.Y. Kwon, J.H. Lee, H.C. Kim, Y.G. Jung, U. Paik, K.S. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 429
(2006) 173.
[23] B. Siebert, C. Funke, R. Vaen, D. Stver, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 9293 (1999)
217.
[24] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7 (4) (1992) 1564.
[25] A.C. Fisher-Cripps, Vacuum 58 (2000) 569.
[26] Jianghong Miao, Zhijian Peng, Longhao Qi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 354 (2003) 140.
[27] Zhijian Gong, Hezhou Miao, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24 (2004) 2193.
[28] J. Woirgard, C. Tromas, J.C. Girard, V. Audurier, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18 (1998)
22972305.
[29] A. Krell, S. Schdlich, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 307 (2001) 172.
[30] J. Rodrguez, A. Rico, E. Otero, W.M. Rainforth, Acta Mater. (in press) DOI:10.106/j.
actamat.2009.03.020.
[31] A. Rico, M.A. Garrido, J. Rodrguez, Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. V. 47 (2008) 110.
[32] F. Traeger, M. Ahrens, R. Vaen, D. Stver, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 358 (2003) 255.
[33] J. Aktaa, K. Sfar, D. Munz, Acta Mater. 53 (2005) 4399.
[34] E.P. Busso, L. Wright, H.E. Evans, L.N. McCartney, S.R.J. Saunders, S. Osgerby, J. Nunn,
Acta Mater. 55 (2007) 1491.