Richardson Grant Final
Richardson Grant Final
Richardson Grant Final
Needs Assessment
Weigel Library is a venue for group study and collaborative learning for students,
faculty and staff. Those who use this small branch of K-State Libraries are primarily
members of the College of Architecture, Planning and Design. In order to facilitate this
learning environment in an academic library setting, library patrons need collaborative
tools.
When students and faculty gather to study and share project plans in the current
branch library setting, the creating and sharing of visual materials is accomplished by
displaying drawings on the flat surface of a study table, through verbally describing
design concepts or by gathering around individual computers to electronically display
their creative ideas.
Over the next two years, the building will undergo extensive renovations, making
the availability of group study and collaborative spaces scarce. Incorporating innovative,
collaborative tools in the branch will provide a valuable asset to our service population
during this time of transition. These collaborative tools will also serve as a technological
experiment, providing administration with user feedback about implementing similar
tools in the new branch library.
The funding sought through this grant will provide an Interactive White Board
(IWB) for Weigel Library. An example that demonstrates the instructional use of such a
tool can be seen in this video by Samsung: http://youtu.be/rBohGcWBgiM Also referred
to as interactive touch-screen display, the Samsung website describes the IWB as
having three main components: a large format display (similar to a flat screen tv), a
touchscreen overlay for said display, and the Magic IWB software package. Unlike
Save money: Students will have the ability to remotely connect to the IWB, sharing
what otherwise might need to be printed with their classmates and professor. Changes
to the design can be made and iterations saved digitally. Administration will see a
decrease in operational costs. According to the Samsung website, when compared to a
projector-based interactive system maintenance needs, the IWB saves an average of
30% during the first four years of ownership.
2.
present successfully with them, will give students experience in an environment they
may encounter with future employers. These skills will increase the students
marketability, making them valuable prospective employees in their field of study.
3.
Interactivity: Library patrons will participate in real time learning. This technology
will transform group/class study through virtual screen sharing software and the handson development of ideas shared on the large display. They will have enhanced
designing abilities through interactive drawing tools and the integration of digital media.
4.
Collaboration: Library patrons will be able to produce new material and illustrate
iterations of their designs with their class or study group. Groups will be able to engage
one another in their learning processes, creating collaborative learning communities.
5.
Improved pedagogy: Instructors, presenters and group leaders using the IWB will
content availability, options like video and image capture, the sharing or storing of
presentations and ability to mark up files and save them as a copies, will allow the
creative process to flow and function more quickly and smoothly. This will also improve
course access for students with learning, physical or cognitive issues.
Grant funding for this project will address the goal of providing academic library
patrons an effective group-learning environment through improved collaborative study
methods facilitated by the incorporation of an Interactive White Board (IWB).
The objectives for this project are based on two of the instructional needs
identified in the Needs Assessment: Interactivity and Collaboration. These needs are
being viewed through the lens of the College of Architecture, Planning and Design
(College of APDesign) Mission statement, one aspect of which asserts the importance
of A creative, stimulating environment that inspires shared learning and creative
growth. In providing collaborative study tools, we will be facilitating both shared
learning and creative growth.
Budget
Grant funds are requested for the interactive white board (IWB), operating software, and
related equipment. The remaining budget consists of In-kind Costs of staff time for
installation, maintenance, promotion, training and evaluation.
Grant Costs
Total
$2,600
IWB software
$600
Internet modem/router
$120
$420
$3740
In-kind Costs
Approx. 80 hrs.
$0
$0
Total Costs
$3,740
Program Evaluation
The objectives for this program are specific and measurable. The purpose of the
evaluation is to measure the program impact and effectiveness, based on the program
objectives.
The funding sought through this grant will provide an Interactive White Board
(IWB) for Weigel Library. Also referred to as interactive touch-screen display, the
manufacturers website describes the IWB as having three main components: a large
format display (similar to a flat screen tv), a touchscreen overlay for said display, and
the Magic IWB software package. The IWB will facilitate collaborative study and
learning for library patrons.
Evaluation Methods
Formative Evaluation
The library space for this proposal is an open room, allowing staff to observe IWB
activity and use. Using a spreadsheet, the library staff will record statistics on the use of
the IWB through observation. Staff will also train interested patrons on the use of the
IWB and through these staff/patron interactions, encourage user feedback via survey
(online or hard copy).
The observational statistics and feedback survey results will be analyzed at the
end of each semester for a full calendar year. The results of the formative evaluation will
reveal the degree of the success and/or effectiveness of the program objectives. Based
on the end of semester evaluation compilations, in-program changes may be
implemented to improve overall program success. For example, formative data may
reveal that more formal IWB training for library patrons may be necessary for objective
effectiveness and program success. A library administrator who specializes in
assessment will assist with evaluation processes and conclusions.
Summative Evaluation
At the conclusion of a full calendar year of IWB implementation, a summative
evaluation of program objectives will be conducted. This will also use the datasets of
staff observations of IWB use and patron feedback surveys measuring the effectiveness
of the program objectives. In particular, these datasets will show the growth and impact
over the full term of the program, revealing both areas of program strength and
development need. The summative evaluation will demonstrate a broad scope of the
program, statistically supporting or discounting the usefulness of IWB use in contributing
to the success of library patrons collaborative learning environment.
References
College of Architecture, Planning and Design: Mission and Vision. (2013, October 9).
Retrieved April 12, 2015, from http://apdesign.k-state.edu/about/mission.html
Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative
collaboration. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Karsh, E., & Fox, A. (2014). The only grant-writing book you'll ever need (Fourth ed.).
New York: Basic Books.
McElrath, T., & Carlson, M. (2013). Winning grants step by step: The complete
workbook for planning, developing, and writing successful proposals (Fourth ed.).
San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Samsung Magic IWB 3.0 Demo. (n.d.). Retrieved March 17, 2015, from
http://youtu.be/rBohGcWBgiM