Capital Plans NC
Capital Plans NC
Capital Plans NC
DIVISION OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY
MULTI– YEAR
CAPITAL PLANS
Thomas P. DiNapoli
Original Issue Date
SEPTEMBER 2002
Issue Date
MAY 2003
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
Overview ........................................................................................................................ 1
Part III - Setting Criteria for Capital Projects and Purchases .................................... 3
Introduction
Long-term planning for capital asset purchases can provide local officials with other
benefits beyond the assured continuance of municipal services. Proper planning can
improve the quality of those services. By linking a multi-year capital plan to a
concurrent strategic plan, managers can effectively plan for the acquisition of those
assets that will help achieve their government’s strategic goals. Multi-year capital
planning can augment a municipality’s economic development policies. Plans can be
made for infrastructure improvements and other amenities that would make the local
government more attractive to businesses, homeowners and/or tourists. Such
long-range plans would signify a pledge to invest in the community.
Capital planning can also improve a local government’s bottom line. Planning ahead for
these costly purchases can allow managers time to increase the down payment,
thereby lessening the amount to be borrowed and reducing the associated costs. It
also gives managers time to obtain the best purchase price and seek alternative
financing sources (e.g., state and federal aid). Long-term capital plans can also allow
managers to spread the acquisition costs over a number of years so that no one budget
year is overburdened with several capital purchases. Similarly, the planned
replacement of aging assets can prevent costly emergency purchases from inflicting
havoc on operations, budgets and tax rates.
Overview
This chapter will address the process for developing an effective capital asset program.
It will discuss:
A multi-year capital plan is best developed in the context of a larger strategic plan that
spells out a municipality’s mission, goals and objectives. Capital acquisitions should
support the local government’s long-term goals. For example, a municipality’s strategic
plan for water service may include such goals as providing pure, high quality drinking
water to all residents and maintaining water service capacity at levels sufficient to meet
current and future needs. A capital plan should provide the significant assets needed to
accomplish these goals. In the absence of a formal strategic vision, managers should
seek to identify the key objectives of a multi-year capital program.
Capital program goals and objectives should be included in a formal policy adopted by
the governing board. Such a policy will provide a framework for the local government’s
long-term capital plan. It should address all the implementation aspects of the
multi-year program including:
Many of these items will be discussed in later sections of this chapter. In general, a
comprehensive policy should address each of these items in detail and in relation to
identified goals and objectives (strategic and programmatic).
The selection criteria for capital acquisitions should be clearly identified in a policy
document. The policy should list, define and rank the selection criteria in order of
importance so that department heads and others can effectively gauge their requests.
This list (and ranking) should be a direct result of the information gathered when the
program goals and objectives were set.
Although the criteria are largely dependent upon the goals and objectives established
by the municipality, there are a number of areas to consider when evaluating potential
projects and purchases. Some categories to consider include:
• Health and safety impacts - project (or purchase) improves public health or
safety.
• Legal mandates - project is mandated by court or state or federal government.
• Fiscal and budget impact - project impact is favorable for existing costs and
resources.
• Economic development impacts - project supports economic development
goals.
• Leveraging other projects - project is linked to other projects and provides
positive impact, improves results.
• Feasibility - project is realistic, reasonable and supported.
• Savings potential - project improves the bottom line short-term, long-term.
• Environmental, aesthetic or social value - project improves environment,
neighborhoods or community.
• Regional impact - project also benefits other local governments.
• Operational impact - project benefits several departments.
• Mission effectiveness - project contributes directly to achievement of strategic
goals.
• Customer needs - project addresses specific needs/demands for improved
service, timeliness or cost savings.
Deciding upon which of these categories to use and how they are to be weighted should
be determined by the wishes of the local officials and their constituents.
As part of project selection, a capital assets policy should outline the review and
approval process. Capital project and purchase requests (meeting selected criteria)
submitted by department heads may require a review by legal, engineering or other
professionals before approval can be granted and the request can become part of the
capital plan and budget. All aspects of major capital acquisitions, identified benefits,
estimated costs and anticipated financing, should be substantiated before final approval
is given. (See Appendix C for a sample department request form.)
With clear goals and objectives and well-defined criteria for selecting capital projects
and purchases, the pieces are in place to create a formal multi-year action plan. An
additional step should be performed before the initial capital program is drafted. The
capital plan must be matched to existing capital assets.
If capital asset records do not currently exist, an inventory of the municipality’s assets
should be conducted. An inventory will provide managers with valuable information on
the current condition of capital assets. However, such an inventory can be a significant
(costly) undertaking, especially in larger local governments, and although up-to-date,
capital asset records provide significant managerial benefits (see Capital Assets,
Chapter 4) to get the information needed for developing a capital plan, managers can
consider another option.
With current information on key capital assets, another piece is in place to create a
formal multi-year action plan. Managers should use the inventory information and
established goals and objectives to prioritize the identified capital projects (and
purchases). The estimated costs assigned to these projects should be verified through
discussions with department heads, purchasing officers, banks, engineers, potential
vendors, state agencies and other local governments. Once accurate price tags have
been attached to each project, funding availability becomes a factor for prioritizing these
projects. All financing sources, state, federal, local and borrowed, should be
determined for the next year and beyond. If some of the projects will require the use of
in-house labor, then staff work loads will also have to be scheduled into the capital plan.
Just like an annual operating budget, a multi-year capital budget can require difficult
decisions. The balancing of limited resources with seemingly unlimited demands. The
good news is that all the groundwork will make the decisions easier and everything
does not have to be accomplished (and paid for) in year one. Within fiscal constraints,
the nature and importance of individual projects will dictate which ones will be
accomplished in year one and which ones will be accomplished in years two, three, four
and beyond.
To ensure that the moneys are available when needed for capital purposes, local
managers should consider establishing reserve funds. Through formal resolution, the
governing board can establish reserve funds earmarking resources for the future
acquisition of essential capital assets. For example, these reserve funds may be
funded from available fund balance, appropriations or proceeds from the sale of assets.
(Chapter 5 on Reserves provides guidance on the establishment of capital and other
reserve funds.) The use of such reserve funds would then be listed as a funding
source, where applicable, in a multi-year capital plan.
Similarly, annual funding sources can also be included in the long-term plan. Each
year’s budget may contain provisions for the partial, or total, funding for designated
assets. For example, many larger municipalities provide funding for a certain number of
new police cars in each year’s budget, to be paid for out of current appropriations.
When feasible, this acceptable financing method should be part of a multi-year capital
plan. For those capital items that are replaced regularly, this “pay-as-you-go”
philosophy can provide an equitable and cost-effective financing option. Because
residents are receiving the benefit of new equipment every year, the annual payments
match the benefits received. Because moneys are not borrowed for this equipment,
associated costs are avoided.
Using “other people’s money” to finance capital acquisitions (or any other expenditure)
is probably a favorite option of many public managers. Donations and grants are at the
head of any financing “wish list”. Municipal cooperative arrangements could be a
second choice depending on the particular terms (conditions), often subject to
negotiation. Borrowed moneys and lease-purchases (where authorized) might be the
last choices, again depending on the financing terms. (See also Chapter 10 on Debt
Management.) Public managers should exhaust this list of external financing options
when developing a long-term capital plan. Ideally, each one of these funding options
should be included in a comprehensive capital plan.
The acquisition of capital assets can have a significant impact on subsequent operating
budgets. This impact should be considered as part of any multi-year capital plan. All
areas of the budget should be assessed, operating expenditures, debt and revenues.
If moneys were borrowed to finance all, or part, of a capital acquisition, the principal and
interest payments to retire the resulting debt must be planned for in each year’s budget
for the life of the obligation. Similarly, periodic lease-purchase payments must be
accounted for in the capital plan.
For those capital assets intended to be income producers, estimated revenues may be
included in multi-year plans. These revenues should be conservatively estimated to
avoid unpleasant surprises if shortfalls occur. Again, using the swimming pool example,
if fees will be collected for use of the pool, include an estimate of these revenues in the
capital plan. In effect, these revenues can help offset the additional costs identified
earlier. All this information can help local officials better manage municipal assets.
Once all aspects of the plan (goals, policies, criteria, needs, finances, and costs) have
been addressed, the capital plan can be formalized. (See Appendix D for a sample
5-year capital plan.) The capital plan should be approved and the annual budget,
including capital components, formally adopted by the governing board. To assist this
process, a document that describes the proposed program and budget should be
developed. This document should describe the preliminary program and capital portion
of the budget to the governing board, citizens, and other interested parties. It should
convey relevant information about the capital program clearly so that all interested
parties can respond effectively to the proposed capital priorities. The proposed capital
plan should also be circulated for public input. This will allow public interest groups,
1
As used in this chapter, a capital budget is a plan of proposed capital outlays and the means to finance them for the current fiscal
year. It is part of the current budget, and adopted with the regular operating budget.
A municipality can decide to adopt its capital plan pursuant to General Municipal Law
§99-g (see Appendices A and B). This statute outlines responsibilities and the
procedures to be followed, and once adopted must be adhered to so long as the capital
program remains in effect. As an alternative, local officials can merely refer to the
statute for additional guidance on developing their own plan and procedures.
Just like any budget, a function of the capital budget is to help control expenditures.
Spending limits are set by the governing board through the adoption of the capital
budget and through the authorization of individual capital projects. Board members and
other managers should be kept apprised of capital spending-to-date versus approved
amounts. Where cost overruns are anticipated, the board should act to control
spending or modify the budget.
Asset performance should also be evaluated. Over time, have the capital purchases
and projects produced the expected results? Have long-term goals been met? Are
changes necessary? Managers must be able to answer these questions. (See also
Chapter 4 on Capital Assets.) They will need an information system that allows them to
monitor performance.
Local officials should monitor the external environment to help them anticipate changes
that might impact the later years of the capital program. Changes in technology or
equipment can make portions of the plan obsolete. Changes in anticipated state and
federal funding can impact the number and priority of planned projects. Circumstances
may change within the municipality that directly affect the needs of the community.
Citizen input may signal a change in direction. Managers should be aware of these
external factors, and others, that can and should change the focus of strategic and
capital plans.
Finally, after the initial capital plan has been completed and projects are underway, a
review of the planning process should be undertaken to determine whether changes
should be made to improve the process. This step is particularly important for
governments developing a capital program for the first time. All participants in the
planning process should provide input as to what aspects of the process have worked
well and what aspects should be modified.
Many municipalities have adopted a formal plan for capital asset acquisitions in
accordance with the provisions of Section 99-g of the General Municipal Law, or may
choose to do so in the future. This statute outlines responsibilities and the procedures
to be followed, and once adopted must be adhered to so long as the Capital Program
remains in effect.
3. The officer charged with the preparation of the tentative budget shall
annually cause the capital program to be prepared, and shall submit it to
the governing board with the tentative budget. It shall be arranged in such
manner as to indicate the order of priority of each project, and to state for
each project:
(a) A description of the proposed project and the estimated total cost
thereof;
6. The governing board shall annually adopt the capital program after review
and revisions, if any. The provisions of any law relating to a public hearing
on the tentative budget, and to the adoption of the budget, shall apply to
the capital program.
7. At any time during the fiscal year for which the capital program was
adopted, the governing board by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of its
total membership, may amend the capital program by adding, modifying
or abandoning the projects, or by modifying the methods of financing. No
capital project shall be authorized or undertaken unless it is included in
the capital program as adopted or amended.
8. The term “capital project” as used in section 99-g shall mean: (a) any
physical betterment or improvement, including furnishings, machinery,
apparatus or equipment for such physical betterment or improvement
when first constructed or acquired, (b) any preliminary studies and
surveys relating to any physical betterment or improvement, (c) land or
rights in land, or (d) any combination of (a), (b), and (c).
A. No. Municipalities can develop their own procedures and time frame for their
individual multi-year capital plan.
Q. If the capital plan your municipality adopts is in accordance with Section 99-g of
the General Municipal Law, can it be for a five (5) year period?
A. No. All provisions of Section 99-g must be adhered to including the requirement
for a six (6) year plan.
Q. How do you determine the effect upon operating costs for the three (3) year
projection to be included in a capital plan?
Q. After the governing board has formally adopted its capital plan, is it still
necessary to observe the competitive bidding requirements of Section 103 of the
General Municipal Law?
A. Yes. All state and local statutes, including Section 103, must be followed. In
addition, any special provisions of state or federal grants and specific trusts must
be observed.
Q. Do you need a capital reserve fund before you have a capital plan, or vice-versa?
A. A capital reserve fund may be established as a future financing source for capital
acquisitions under a capital plan, but there is no requirement that management
do so.
A. Department heads, other officials and employees, civic groups and interested
individuals should be encouraged to submit written requests for items to be
included in the capital plan. Suggestions should be submitted using a standard
format, approved by the governing board, to ensure that all necessary
information is provided. The requests should be forwarded to a capital planning
coordinator for processing and review.
A review committee should evaluate each request in terms of the goals and
needs of the municipality, project criteria, estimated total cost for acquisition and
maintenance, and availability of financial resources.
A. A capital planning coordinator should prepare the multi-year capital plan. The
projects making up the plan should be arranged in order of priority based on
relative urgency and merit. This priority should be established both by year of
the plan and within the individual years.
A. Normally, the capital plan is adopted at the same time as the budget.
A. The first year of the multi-year plan would serve as the annual capital budget.
Appropriations for capital projects are provided in the operating budget only for
that portion to be financed from current revenues or surplus. That portion of a
project to be financed through the issuance of obligations would not appear in
the operating budget. The capital budget provides the details to support the
operating budget appropriations.
Q. Must the budgetary appropriations for a capital plan be transferred to the capital
projects fund?
A. At any time after the adoption of the capital plan, the governing board may
amend the plan by a majority vote.
This should not be confused with revisions that may be made each year when
the capital plan is being prepared, and prior to its adoption.
A. Repair reserve funds can greatly influence when capital assets will be replaced.
Utilizing a repair reserve fund may increase the useful life of a capital asset,
which might delay its replacement date. For example, repairing the engine in a
dump truck may permit using the asset for several years longer than expected.
Thus, by making a relatively small expenditure a major capital outlay is
postponed.
A. Yes. The entire capital needs of the municipality should be included in the
capital plan.
A. Yes. Each municipality should include a joint capital project in their capital plan.
Each municipality, in addition to disclosing their proportionate share of the project
and means of financing, should also disclose the total cost of the project and the
share of the other municipality. This may be accomplished by including the other
municipality’s cost in the text of the capital plan or as a footnote to the capital
plan.
Description: ___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Anticipated
Benefits: ___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Suggested
Sources: ___________________________________
Suggested
Financing: ___________________________________
Board
Action: ___________________________________ Project # ______
Lead Time: Time needed to acquire asset and put into operation
Estimated Costs: Initial costs to acquire and make asset operational plus
annual costs to operate and maintain asset
Cost Support: Basis for figures included for initial and annual cost
estimates
Resource Needs: Estimated staff time needed to acquire asset and make
operational
FUNDING:
20X1 – 20X5
Fund Balance 0
Reserve Funds 190,000 40,000 75,000 75,000
Federal/State Aid 20,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Borrowings 100,000 100,000
Other 0
$425,000 $25,000 $75,000 $25,000 $75,000 $25,000 $175,000 $25,000 $11,500
Total
Annual Costs Costs for debt service, insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc.,
expected to be incurred in fund’s operating budget
Other Resources
There are several sources of additional information on multi-year capital plans including
local colleges and universities. Also, many local governments have been using these
long-term management tools for some time and could provide valuable information on
putting such a plan in place.
Our regional offices can also provide assistance. See the listings on the next page for the
office in your area.
Executive ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................474-4037
Steven J. Hancox, Deputy Comptroller
John C. Traylor, Assistant Comptroller
Office of the State Comptroller, 110 State St., Albany, New York 12236
Mailing Address
(Zip Code for Retirement System is 12244)
for all of the above:
email: localgov@osc.state.ny.us
w w w.osc.state.ny.us
RMD20
Need Help? Technical Assistance is available at any of the Regional Offices above.
w w w.osc.state.ny.us