Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefellv.Hodges
Nos.14556,14571,and14574
June26,2015
Facts:
Inthiscase,fourteensamesexcouplesweretheplaintiffs,
and James Obergefell was one of them. The defendant is the
DirectoroftheOhioDepartmentofHealthnamedRichardHodges.
The States of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee
definedmarriageasaunionbetweenonemanandonewomananddid
notrecognizesamesexmarriages.Theplaintiffsconfrontedthese
laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution.Theychallengetheconstitutionalityofthosebans
on samesex marriage. They filed lawsuits in federal district
courtintheirhomestates.Theyarguedthat:
1)TheStatesstatuteviolatedtheEqualProtectionClause
andDueProcessClauseoftheFourteenthAmendment;
2) The Fourteenth Amendment required the States to allow
samesexmarriage;
3)TheFourteenthAmendmentrecognizedthevalidityofsuch
marriagesexecutedinotherjurisdictions.
Thefederaldistrictcourtsruledinfavoroftheplaintiffs
buttheCourtofAppealsconsolidatedthecasesandreversedthe
rulingsconsequentlytheplaintiffsappealedtotheSupremeCourt
oftheUnitedStates.
Issue:
Whetherornotmarriagelicensesmustbegrantedtosamesex
couplesineveryState.
Held:
Yes.TheFourteenthAmendmentrequiresthattheStatesmust
grant marriage licenses to samesex couples because samesex
coupleshavetherighttomarryineveryState.
TheSupremeCourtreasonedthatthehistoryofmarriageis
manifestedbybothcontinuityandchange.Changes,forinstance
the abandonment of the law of coverture and the waning of
arranged marriage have affected characteristics of marriage.
Thesenewinsightsinunderstandingmarriagehavefortifiedit,
notdestabilizedit.
Developments and shifts in public attitudes have made it
possible for samesex couples to enjoy more open and public
lives.Inthe2003,inthecaseofLawrencev.Texas,theSupreme
Courtheldthatlawsthatmadesamesexintimacyacrime,were
unconstitutionalandithumiliatedthelivesofgaypeople.It