Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Major in Happiness
Debunking the College Major
Fallacies
Dedication
To my parents Bernard and Lillian
They made sure I majored in happiness
viii
Abstract
The preconceptions and suspicions about how things operate in todays
challenging global marketplace often compel people to forge correlations
with causations without any substantial evidence. Unfortunately, this flawed
thinking is the foundation upon which many students declare their undergraduate major. With the repayment of college loans as a paramount issue
for students and their families, the major is often viewed as the stepping
stone for a career that can repay those loans instead of the first step to a
meaningful life based on leadership, purpose, and service. Students should
declare a major that makes them happy. Doing so substantially increases
their chances of pursuing careers paths that ignite their passion, identify
with their purpose, and spark a commitment to lifelong learning. All too
often, however, students are exposed to the myopic valuable versus useless
paradigm of decision-making process when it comes to declaring a major.
According to this paradigm, a valuable major is useful, can teach a specific
skill, and provides one with a lifetime of employment and riches. Accounting, marketing, engineering, and computer science are just a few examples.
A worthless major, on the other hand, is more intellectual and therefore
has little, or no, practical application for employment purposes. Majors that
generally fall into this category include history, English, philosophy, and
sociology among others. This dichotomy between the valuable versus useless
majors is based on flawed mental models and ingrained assumptions about
how the world works that lead to a series of fallacies surrounding the college
major. Major in Happiness: Debunking the College Major Fallacies examines a
variety of assumptions prevalent in the mental models of undergraduates,
parents, educators, higher education leaders, administrators, and policymakers that cause people to fall into a series of mental traps when selecting a
major. Divided into three parts, this publication presents a situational analysis on choosing a college major, dissects the mental models and traps people
rely on, and offers a variety of assessments that can help increase ones selfawareness prior to declaring a major.
KEYWORDS
Keywords
higher education, career development, vocational guidance, college majors, academic programs, undergraduate education, personal development, professional development
Major in happiness.
Gain insight into the fallacies and myths behind certain majors.
Declare the major you believe is best for you.
Advocate for yourself.
Assess your skills, traits, and talents.
Exercise self-determination in order to develop into the person you
want to be.
7. Separate fact from fiction regarding the application and value of
different majors.
8. Understand how to better prepare yourself for tomorrows challenges.
9. Increase your self-awareness.
10. Develop a better sense of purpose in your professional life.
xii
Contents
Forward: The Liberal Art ..................................................................... xv
Preface: Explaining Happiness ............................................................ xvii
Acknowledgments ................................................................................ xix
Introduction ..................................................................................... xxiii
Part I
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Part II
Chapter 5
Trap One: Your Major Determines Your LongTerm Earning Potential ..................................................29
Trap Two: You Need to Land Your Dream Job and
Figure out What You Want to Do with the Rest of
Your Life ........................................................................43
Trap Three: You Can Apply to Jobs Related to
Only Your Major ............................................................55
Trap Four: Employers Care about Only Your Major
and Grade Point Average ................................................67
Trap Five: Students Must Specialize in One Major in
Order to Succeed ............................................................77
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Part III
Assessments ................................................... 97
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
xiv
CONTENTS
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
xvi
post-college reflection or appreciation, but as an active part of their college search and daily lives as undergraduate students.
Rev. Kristen Glass Perez
Chaplain and Director for Vocational Exploration
Augustana College
Rock Island, Illinois
Preface: Explaining
Happiness
It is both useful and necessary to understand how I am defining the term
happiness. Happiness refers to the pursuit of meaning through a life of
purpose, leadership, and service to others. Undergraduates can best
achieve this pursuit through a gradual increase in their self-awareness
fostered by adventures in disequilibrium that destabilize their level of
comfort, challenge their assumptions about life, and allow them an opportunity to accommodate new information. Perhaps now more than
ever, the world needs college students on campuses large and small
around the globe to declare a major in happiness. We are both witnesses
and participants in a global epidemic of unhappiness, disengagement,
and negativity. According to Gallups 142-country study on the State of
the Global Workplace, only 13 percent of employees worldwide are engaged at work. In other words, about one in eight workersroughly
180 million employees in the countries studiedare psychologically
committed to their jobs and likely to be making positive contributions to
their organizations.2 Statistics for the United States echo global attitudes. Less than one-third (31.5 percent) of U.S. workers were engaged
in their jobs in 2014 and just 33 percent of Americans said that they
were very happy, remaining consistent with happiness levels in 2011 but
dropping from the 35 percent who reported being very happy in 2008
and 2009.3 Unfortunately, the happiness factor for undergraduates mimics the statistics on both the global and U.S. levels. This has to stop.
If todays undergraduates are going to help solve tomorrows problems, they need to understand that the pursuit of a college degree has to
be more than a collection of rsum building experiences designed to attract employers and land a high-paying job after graduation. Getting a
good paying job is important, but it is also relative. Achieving financial
independence for young professionals should indeed be a priority. After
all, graduates have loans to repay, health insurance costs to satisfy, and
living expenses to cover. However, if we teach undergraduates, the only
thing that matters, the only thing that will make them happy, is a high
xviii
Acknowledgments
As a first-generation college student, my two main acknowledgments go
to my parents Bernard and Lillian Edmondson. They made sure that I
attended Cabrini College in Radnor, Pennsylvania, and never once pressured me into selecting a specific major. Their lack of knowledge about
higher education and its policies served as a blessing in disguise. If ignorance is bliss, then my parents ignorance about college majors was indeed
my bliss. I declared accounting as my first major and quickly switched to
one more to my likinghistory. Mom and dad never challenged me
about my decision to change majors. They never asked me what I was
going to do with a history degree. Many people, then as well as now, label
history one of the useless majors. Nothing could be further from the
truth. There is no such thing as a useless major. Without knowing it,
mom and dad allowed me to major in happiness. More of todays students
need to major in happiness. The substantial rise in depression and anxiety
among todays undergraduates is frighteningly alarming. All too often
todays undergraduates are pressured by their parents or their own perceptions of how the world operates to go into the right school, declare the
right major, secure the right job, get the right salary, and have the right
life. Such thinking is outrageous. Yet this is exactly what has been happening, is happening, and will continue to happen until the insanity stops.
Major in Happiness: Debunking the College Major Fallacies is my small
attempt to stop the insanity. Parents, professors, higher education officials,
and other stakeholders have a responsibility to educate our students and
each other on the major in happiness campaign.
During the last few weeks of working on this manuscript, my father
died. He and my mom went for their daily swim on June 1 and by July
10 he had passed away. In less than 40 days, stage 4 lung cancer eviscerated my father faster than any of us thought possible. His passing devastated my family, especially my mother who had a 59-year relationship
with him. During one of his last days, dad told me he was proud of me.
He never mentioned my undergraduate major. He was proud of the man,
father, and son I had become. In a book about undergraduate majors, this
is an important point to acknowledge. The selection of a college major is
xx
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
xxi
nately, I have witnessed the deep concern that middle school students
and parents have over getting their child into the right high school that
will lead to the right college and then land the dream job to have the
perfect life; or the high school student who takes every AP class imaginable and gets involved in multiple activities only to get rejected by every college he or she thinks has the magic elixir to a successful career.
Those thousands of encounters formed the genesis of this book. Some
students and parents understood the major in happiness campaign.
Most did not. I am grateful for all of those conversations.
To the entire team at Business Expert Press, including Stewart
Mattson, Rob Zwettler, Charlene Kronstedt, Sean Kaneski, Sheri Dean,
and Karen Amundson, I owe my deepest appreciation and gratitude for
their constant support. Major in Happiness is my second book with Business Expert Press as they published Marketing Your Value: Nine Steps to
Navigate Your Career in 2015 for me. Special thanks to John Christian,
Jeremy Osborn, Pastor Kristen Glass Perez, Cindy Szadokierski, Laura
Grayson Roselli, and Arun Tilak for their thoughts on a draft of this
manuscript. I would also like to extend a special acknowledgment and
thank you to my family and friends for their daily guidance and support,
including my wife Lori Joyce who made sure that our children Amanda
Haley and Jonathan Victor majored in happiness. They provide a much
needed perspective and are a constant reminder that a college major is but
one small component of a life well-lived.
xxiv
xxv
xxvi
childs maturity. As one mother said, when you hover, you take away that
sense of self-esteem.27 Self-determination demands that a child resolves
problems, works through challenging situations, and has difficult conversations with others on his or her own. The journey to self-discovery is lifelong
and best made with the child learning how to navigate his or her own life.
One such stop along the journey is the declaration of an undergraduate
major.
Students often approach the college major decision with a good deal
of anxiety, confusion, and doubt. It is no surprise that many students
will change their major at least once during their undergraduate experience. Students ask themselves a variety of questions such as: What is the
right major? What major will help me with the rest of my life? What
major will make me the most money? What major do employers want
me to have? Unfortunately some students also find themselves asking
questions such as: Will my parents still pay my tuition if I declare this as
a major? Will my parents be mad at me with this decision? Will my parents stop talking to me if I declare this as a major? As they often do,
helicopter parents attempt to answer or influence how their child answers these questions. This might be difficult to hear but when it comes
to the declaration of a college major, parents may not know best. As
journalist H.L. Mencken once quipped, The older I grow the more I
distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom.28 You may indeed
be older and have more professional experience than your child, but
those two characteristics are far from being qualified to mandate your
college students undergraduate major.
Many parents feel as though that since they are paying tuition they
get to dictate what their child declares as a major. These questions and
related approaches on how to answer them frequently strike terror in the
hearts and minds of students for the simple fact that they believe if they
choose the wrong major their life is ruined. Nothing could be further
from the truth. Intrusive parents who encourage this type of thinking
are placing their child at a severe disadvantage. For many traditional
undergraduates aged 1824, they are unsure as to what they want to do
following graduation. Since cognitive development continues well in the
20s, it is no surprise that a good portion of students buy into the notion
that their parents know best. But parents may not know best. Instead of
knowing answers, or at least pretending to do so, parents should instead
xxvii
xxviii
1. How often do you support your childs self-determination? Another way to ask this question is: How often do you foster autonomy, competence, and connectedness when dealing with your child?
Do you find yourself making decisions for them or do you allow
them to freely decide? Do you complete a task for them thereby
sending the message that the child is incompetent? Fostering selfdetermination in your child is hard work, so the more you interfere, disrupt, or prohibit their progress, the more challenging it is
for them to have a sense of self. Supporting a childs ability to selfdetermine involves nurturing their skills and abilities, understanding their thoughts and feelings, and enabling them to dream and
aspire. When parents decide for their children rather than help
them to decide for themselves, children become dependent, not independent, compliant rather than adventurous.30 When it comes
to discussing declaring a college major, parents can support their
childs self-determination by recalling the work of Hazel Rose
Markus and Paula Nurius who introduced the concept of three
possible selves: the ideal self that we would like to become, that we
could become, and that we are afraid of becoming. To suggest
that there is a single self to which one can be true or an authentic
self that one can know is to deny the rich network of potential that
surrounds individuals and that is important in identifying and descriptive of them.31
Consider supporting your childs decision to declare a major that
fosters the development of who they would like to become but also
provides them with experiences that allow them to explore who they
could become. For those parents courageous enough, encourage your
child to explore experiences and learning opportunities that could help
them become the person they are afraid of becoming! The four
remaining questions are directly linked to self-determination. The
more likely you are to foster your childs self-determination, the more
likely you are to practice the following traits as well.
xxix
2. How often do you allow your child to experience failure, disappointment, or discomfort? Part of self-determination is experiencing failure, disappointment, and discomfort and learning how to
work through each situation. Unfortunately, helicopter or snowplowing parents shield their children from even the slightest degree
of discomfort. Failure is a distant shore that children of intrusive
parents seldom see. Children are sometimes home schooled to prevent them from being exposed to people, ideas, and materials the
parents deem inappropriate. Prohibiting children from people or
ideas you deem uncomfortable for your child to process and then
expecting them to mature into well-adjusted, autonomous adults
able to connect with others is simply unrealistic.32 As one mother
said, we need to let our kids chart their own course and make their
own mistakes.33 Competence is one of the three foundational elements of self-determination, but children need to learn that they
cant be good at everything. To learn lessons of failure, disappointment or discomfort college students need to experience disequilibrium. The experience of psychological and cognitive disequilibrium
produces feelings of internal dissonance that manifests itself as uncertainty, and sometimes as conflict and even threat.34 But it is the
experience of such dissonance that opens up the possibility for learning and growth because it nudges students into confronting and
considering new ways of understanding, thinking, and acting that
help to unsettle the old and integrate it with the new.35
UCLA psychiatrist Paul Bohn believes many parents will do
anything to avoid having their child experience even mild discomfort, anxiety, or disappointment.36 Shielding a child from psychological and cognitive disequilibrium, failure, or discomfort provides
a tremendous disservice; with the result that when, as adults, they
experience the normal frustrations of life, they think something
must be terribly wrong.37 It is essential for students learning and
growth in college to have challenging stimuli and experiences of
positive restlessness because these provide the creative disequilibrium and intellectual foment that drive personal exploration and
development.38
xxx
3. How often do you demand perfection from your child? New research indicates that perfection parenting can cause significant
stress and anxiety in children; therefore, the more parents back
off from pushing their children, the better the outcomes for the
child.39 If you foster self-determination for your child, then you
seldom, if ever, demand perfection. As a parent in todays hypercompetitive, dynamic, and ever-changing global marketplace, you
understand that perfectionism rigidifies behavior. Demanding perfection from a child constricts behavior. To successfully launch and
navigate a career today, one needs to maintain flexibility of mind,
be comfortable with ambiguity, and quickly adapt to changing situations. Parents who demand perfection from a child are unrealistic. Pressure on children to achieve is rampant, because parents
now seek much of their status from the performance of their
kids.40 How often do you demand that your child achieve perfection? Do you demand that your child selects the perfect college major? If so, do you even know what that means? Do you realize that
perfectionism is a form of parental control? Because it lowers the
ability to take risks, perfectionism lowers the ability to take calculated risks, reduces creativity, and stifles innovation. Therefore, a
child pressured into achieving perfection is highly unlikely to be
engaged in self-determination.
Psychologists today differentiate between positive perfectionism, which is adaptive and healthy, and negative perfectionism,
which is maladaptive and neurotic.41 In Tal Ben-Shahars book The
Pursuit of Perfect, he refers to negative perfectionism simply as perfectionism and to positive perfectionism as optimalism. For BenShahar, the optimist embraces the constraints of reality while a perfectionist rejects those constraints. A child engaged in selfdetermination learns to accept the constraints of reality, adjusts his
or her goals and aspirations accordingly, and demonstrates his or her
commitment to discovering the self the child would like to become.
xxxi
4. How often are you certain? Parents who interfere with their childs
decision to declare their undergraduate major often do so out of
certainty. The parent is certain that major x is right for their child,
but this certainty often interferes with a childs self-determination.
In higher education circles, there is an adage that every student
has two majors: the one their parents want them to have and the
one they want to declare. Being certain about the employability of
a major provides a student with false hope and is terribly misleading. In todays ever-changing global marketplace, business executives care more about their new hires thinking, communication,
and problem-solving skills than they do about their undergraduate
majors.42 New research also shows that the vast majority of employers (88 percent) are looking for a cultural fit over skills in
their next hire as more and more companies focus on attrition
rates.43 Today, its not just about finding the person that can do the
job, but finding someone who can fit into the corporate culture.
Companies are looking to hire people who demonstrate uniqueness and creativity and can market themselves to match the company culture.44 For example, a common misbelief expressed by
parents to children is that established fields such as banking, medicine, or law provide a sweet salary and job security; but such assurances are quickly becoming a thing of the past.45 When you are
expressing any level of certainty about a college major, it would behoove you to recall the conclusion Philip Tetlock reached in Expert
Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? The average expert was found to be only slightly more accurate than a dartthrowing chimpanzee. Many experts would have done better if they
had made random guesses.46
xxxii
5. How often do you equate high salaries with your childs happiness? Many parents that help pay their childs college tuition want
an immediate return on their investment (ROI). That ROI usually
comes in the form of a high starting salary. Intrusive parents dictate
that their child can accept a job offer only over a certain dollar
amount. These parents equate a high starting salary with their
childs happiness. Once again this type of thinking interferes with a
childs ability to engage in self-determination. For those recent college graduates who are pressured by their parents, they too equate
job satisfaction with a high starting salary. The research indicates
otherwise. In his 1967 publication The Motivation to Work, Frederick Herzberg identified two different categories of factors affecting
the motivation to work: hygiene and motivation. Hygiene factors
include extrinsic factors such as technical supervision, interpersonal
relations, physical working conditions, salary, company policies
and administrative practices, benefits, and job security. In comparison, motivation factors include intrinsic factors such as achievement, recognition and status, responsibility, challenging work, and
advancement in the organization. Herzbergs theory postulates that
only motivation factors have the potential of increasing job satisfaction. The results indicate that the association between salary and
job satisfaction is very weak. When employees are focused on external rewards, the effects of intrinsic motives on engagement are
significantly diminished. This means that employees who are intrinsically motivated are three times more engaged than employees
who are extrinsically motivated (such as by money). Quite simply,
youre more likely to like your job if you focus on the work itself,
and less likely to enjoy it if youre focused on money.47 Daniel
Pinks Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us makes
the same observation. While many people believe that the best way
to motivate others is with external rewards like money, the reality is
that high performance and satisfaction is rooted in the three elements of true motivation: autonomy, mastery, and purpose. When
you are discussing potential employment opportunities with your
child, do you focus solely on salary and the ability to repay college
xxxiii
loans or do you also consider the myriad of other factors that go into job satisfaction? If you are solely focused on salary, what do you
think that does to your childs ability to engage in selfdetermination?
Here is a list of the five questions. Remember, your options are: never,
rarely, sometimes, often, or always.
1. How often do you support your childs self-determination?
2. How often do you allow your child to experience failure, disappointment, or discomfort?
3. How often do you demand perfection from your child?
4. How often are you certain when discussing the future?
5. How often do you equate high salaries with your childs happiness?
Conclusion
These five questions allow parents to reflect on a quote by Chuck
Palahniuk, author of Fight Club: First your parents, they give you your
life, but then they try to give you their life.48 Instead of giving your
children your life, try allowing them to create their own life free from
interference. Provide a sense of hope. Allow them to have their own
dreams. As they translate their inspirations to reality, help them to find
their own way. Encourage instead of discourage. Allow your child an
opportunity to understand what Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote in 1841:
There is a time in every mans education when he arrives at the conviction that... no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through
his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till.49
How often do you help your child till their plot of ground? Or have you
tilled their plot of ground for them? Have you decided their college major for them? Or have you allowed your children to declare their own
college major? Students should be made aware that choosing a college
major that reflects their interests will give them a better chance of succeeding and could also contribute to their satisfaction and happiness in
school and on the job.50
Endnotes
1
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
xxxvi
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ENDNOTES
ENDNOTES
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
xxxvii
PART I
The Situation
Too many students fail to engage in the process of figuring out what they
want to get out of their entire college experience.1
Jeffrey J. Selingo
CHAPTER 1
The Information
Technology Revolution
Higher education institutions do not operate in a vacuum and undergraduates do not declare their major in one either. Any discussion of
higher education in general, and the declaration of a college major specifically, needs to start with the driving force behind todays hypercompetitive global marketplacethe information technology revolution.
Dubbed the most significant revolution of the 21st century by Cambridge University political scientist David Runciman, the information
technology revolution has altered, and will continue to alter, the very
fabric of how people work, live, love, communicate, and do just about
everything else.2 New York Times editorialist and best-selling author
Thomas Friedman echoed similar sentiment and declared the information technology revolution the single most important trend in the
world today.3 Friedman summarized the impact of this revolution as the
world went from connected to hyper-connected during the 20002010
period thanks to cloud computing, robotics, 3G wireless connectivity,
Skype, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Twitter, the iPad, and cheap Internet-enabled smartphones.4
During the 10 years from 2000 to 2010, world Internet usage increased
over 444 percent.5 The UNs International Telecommunication Union
observed that one-third of the worlds population, approximately 2 billion
people, have Internet access. Just a short 10 years ago, only 300 million
people had Internet access. Of the current 2 billion people with Internet
access, 555 million have a fixed broadband subscription, and 950 million
have mobile broadband.6 World population is expected to grow by over a
third, or 2.3 billion people between 2009 and 2050. If that occurs, by 2050
there will be a global population of approximately 9 billion people.7 With
more people alive, it is safe to assume that the number of Internet users will
continue to grow. For example, one estimate from the National Science
Foundation predicts that the Internet will have nearly 5 billion users by
2020.8
MAJOR IN HAPPINESS
The information technology revolution and transition from connected to hyperconnected has resulted in the creation of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) global environment, creating
an entirely new set of issues demanding higher education institutions
and other organizations large and small to rethink how they operate.
Noting the challenging economic times and the need to reconsider how
their schools function, 43 percent of New England college presidents
surveyed said that they didnt think small New England colleges will
remain an important fixture within the academic landscape for many
years to come.9 Eight in 10 CEOs expect their environment to grow
significantly more complex, and fewer than half believe they know how
to deal with it successfully.10 Leaders from organizations large and small
are more concerned than ever about the future because of the new
requirements to lead in the uncertain and ambiguous 21st-century marketplace. The answer, however, is not to have every student major in a
technical field. Fortune 500 CEOs are keenly aware of this as one-third
of them have a liberal arts degree.11 The information technology revolution now demands that college graduates effectively demonstrate skills
that transcend the knowledge they learn from their academic major. In
order to address the challenges, issues, and questions of todays volatile
economy, employers have identified marketing, sales, business, social
media, graphic design, and data analysis as six skills relevant for all college graduates regardless of major.12
Despite articulating the skills they need in graduates in order to stay
competitive, employers believe that higher education institutions are failing
to keep up with todays information technology revolution. Far too many
employers believe higher education institutions are producing graduates in
the 21st century with 20th-century skills.13 This skills mismatch has its
origins within the priorities of employers and educators. When asked to
select the two most important goals for postsecondary education, business
leaders placed the greatest premium on preparing individuals for success in
the workplace (56%) and providing individuals with core academic
knowledge and skills (51%).14 When asked the same question, education
leaders emphasized providing students with core academic knowledge and
skills (64%) and preparing individuals to be lifelong learners (47%).15 Such
opposing viewpoints need to be reconciled if higher education institutions
Index
Academic major. See College major
Adams, Scott, 46
Adulthood, emerging, 4950
AIM (Action, Individual, and
Mission), 109
American Bar Association, 83
American College Health
Association, 44
American College Test (ACT), 13
American Medical Association, 83
Analyzing, as cognitive skill, 71
Anderson, Lorin, 70
Anecdotal fallacy, 19
Applying, as cognitive skill, 71
Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen, 49
As I Lay Dying, 64
Associates degree, by college majors, 15
Association of American Colleges
and Universities (AAC&U),
3031
Association of American Medical
Colleges (AAMC), 83
The Atlantic, 84
Attendance, 125
Baby Boomers, 70
Bachelors degree, by college majors, 15
Biology majors, into medical school, 83
Bloom, Benjamin, 70
Blooms Taxonomy, 70
revised, 70---71
Bolles, Richard, 56
Bright, Jim, 57
Bront, Charlotte, 65
Brotberuf, 63
Bruni, Frank, 99
Businesses support liberal arts, 8082
BusinessWeek, 82
Capecchi, Mario Renato, 136
Caperton, Gaston, 9
Cappelli, Peter, 17
Careers
ability to marketing value, 35---36
chaos theory of, 57---59, 62
college major and, 17
critical importance of networking
and, 38---39
current economic situation for,
117---118
demonstrated preparedness, 36---39
extinct, new, and future, 52---53,
167---171
geography and, 31---33
grit in, 33---35
issue-based, 120---121
jungle gym metaphor and, 61---62
knowledge-based, 119---120
open and close mind, 117---118
paradoxes for decision making
process, 58---59
skill-based, 121
success, 61
emotional intelligence and, 74
grade point average in, 109
networking and, 116
target, 107---108
Casnocha, Ben, 47
Catch-22, 64
Cathy, S. Truett, 136
Causation fallacy, confusing
association with, 1718
Center for Workforce Development, 51
Chanel, Gabrielle Coco Bonheur,
134
Chaos theory, of careers, 5759, 62
The Chaos Theory of Careers: A New
Perspective on Working in the
Twenty-First Century, 57
Chenault, Ken, 81
174
INDEX
College major
applying to jobs related to, 55---57
associates degree by, 15
bachelors degree by, 15
and career potential, 17
changing of, 13
declaration of, 3
and dream job, 43
and earnings, 18, 29---41
enjoyment and, 60---61
fallacies, 17---20
influence factors, 15---16
list from university of Michigan,
157---160
planning for, 13
principles, 58
selection of choices, 13---16
skills relevant for, 4
specialization, 77---85
traps when selecting, 20---21
Collegiate Learning Assessment Plus,
73
Colvin, Geoff, 34, 100
Comfort with ambiguity, 46
Communication, about value, 136
compelling, 76, 143
describing in one word, 149---151
by listening, writing, or speaking, 129
proposition exercise, 151---152
success factors exercise, 152---155
Community college, 9, 14
Comprehension, 123
Courage, definition of, 135
Creating, as cognitive skill, 71
Criticism, acceptance of, 76
Cultural fit, internship and, 6870
Currey, Mason, 64
Daily Rituals: How Artists Work, 64
Daniels, Jeff, 111
Data Driven: What Students Need to
Succeed in A Rapidly
Changing Business World,
100
INDEX
Daum, Kevin, 33
Deadlines, intermediate and final, 124
Degree completion rates, 9
Deloittes global survey of
Millennials, 59
Deng, Valentino, 135
Deresiewicz, William, 45
Diamond, Rebecca, 3132
Dimon, James, 81
Dorsey, Jack, 133134
Downey, John, 55
Dream job
changing, 50---53
flawed thinking with, 47
identifying, 43
landing in, 43---53
pursuit of, 62
Drive: The Surprising Truth about
What Motivates Us, 41
Duckworth, Angela, 3334
Dweck, Carol, 34
Earnings
ability to marketing value, 35---36
and college degree, 7---8
college major and, 29---41
demonstrated career preparedness
and, 36---39
geography and, 31---33
grit in, 33---35
Economic facts, 115
careers and, 117---118
Economic Policy Institute, 7
Emerging Adults in America: Coming
of Age in the 21st Century, 49
Emotional balance, 75
Emotional insight, 75, 141
Emotional intelligence (EI). See
Emotional quotient (EQ)
Emotional quotient (EQ), 7476
empathy, 142---143
relationship skills, 143
self-awareness, 141
self-management, 142
175
Empathy, 75
cognitive and emotional, 75
Empathy, 75, 142143
Employee engagement, lack of, 40
Employee satisfaction, 3941
Employment opportunities
chaos theory of career
development, 57---59
through jungle gym metaphor,
61---62
pursuit of living with purpose,
59---61
through subtle maneuvers, 63---65
Engaged, definition of, 39
Evaluating, as cognitive skill, 71
Facebook, 145146
Fallacies
college major, 17---20
definition of, 17
Faulkner, William, 64
Find The Thing Youre Most
Passionate About, Then
Do It On Nights And
Weekends For The Rest
Of Your Life, 64
Fortune, 61
Fosbury Flop technique, 135
Foundation, undergraduate
education and, 103, 105
Friedman, Thomas, 3, 62
Frost, Robert, 65
Gardner, Christopher Paul, 134
Gardner, John, 45
Gates, Bill, 7, 9
Gates, Melinda, 9
Gelatt, H. B., 58
Gen 2020, 70
Generations, of people, 6970
Gen X, 70
Geography
career and earnings, 31---33
variables for choosing, 32
176
INDEX
INDEX
177
178
INDEX
INDEX
179