Monmouth University Poll 2-29-16
Monmouth University Poll 2-29-16
Monmouth University Poll 2-29-16
Released:
Monday, February 29, 2016
Contact:
PATRICK MURRAY
732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office)
pdmurray@monmouth.edu
FollowonTwitter:@PollsterPatrick
delegates awarded by these two states, said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth
University Polling Institute.
One sign of Trumps impressive showing is that he holds a large lead among evangelical voters in
Alabama 43% compared to 18% for Rubio and 15% for Cruz. He is basically tied with Cruz among this
group in Oklahoma 29% compared to 28% for Cruz and 21% for Rubio. Evangelical voters make up
77% of likely voters in Alabama and 65% in Oklahoma.
Just over 4-in-10 likely Republican primary voters in Alabama (43%) and Oklahoma (44%) say
they are completely decided on their candidate choice. This includes 1% who have already voted by
absentee ballot in Alabama and 7% who have taken advantage of early voting in Oklahoma. The vast
majority of Trump voters say they have locked in their candidate choice 60% in Alabama and 60% in
Oklahoma.
If it came down to a hypothetical three person race, Trump would still hold substantial leads in
both states. In a contest against his two leading competitors, Trump would garner 46% of the Alabama
vote to 27% for Rubio and 20% for Cruz. In Oklahoma, he would have 36% of the vote to 28% for Rubio
and 27% for Cruz.
The Trump campaign dominated the headlines this weekend with the endorsement of a former
rival, New Jerseys governor Chris Christie. While this move set the media abuzz, it really didnt have
much impact on voters. About three-in-four (74% in both Alabama and Oklahoma) say Christies
endorsement has no impact on their vote choice. The remainder are split between saying it makes them
more likely to support Trump 14% in Alabama and 15% in Oklahoma or saying it makes them less
likely to support Trump 9% in Alabama and 10% in Oklahoma.
-- Democratic primary -In the Democratic contest, Hillary Clinton currently holds a commanding 71% to 23% lead over
Bernie Sanders in Alabama. In Oklahoma, though, Sanders has a small 48% to 43% edge over Clinton.
This is much different from the outcomes in these two states eight years ago. In 2008, Clinton lost
Alabama to Barack Obama by 14 points, but she won Oklahoma by a healthy 24 points.
A key difference between these two states is the proportion of minority voters in each. In
Oklahoma, 75% of likely Democratic voters in the Monmouth poll are non-Hispanic whites. In Alabama,
that number is only 42%, while a majority (53%) are black.
Sanders leads Clinton among white voters in Oklahoma by 48% to 41%, but trails in Alabama
with just 37% to 59% for Clinton. Clintons substantial lead among white voters in Alabama is
augmented by her 80% to 12% showing among black voters there.
The best chance for Sanders seems to be in places with largely white Democratic electorates.
Unfortunately for him, the most delegate-rich Super Tuesday states have significant numbers of minority
voters, said Murray.
Half of likely Democratic primary voters say that they are completely decided on their candidate
choice 51% in Alabama and 52% in Oklahoma. Clinton voters are more likely than Sanders supporters
in both states to report their vote is locked in.
The poll also found that voters in both states expect that Clinton will eventually emerge from this
primary season as the 2016 Democratic nominee 75% in Alabama and 66% in Oklahoma.
The Monmouth University Poll was conducted by telephone from February 25 to 28, 2016 with
likely voters in the Republican presidential primaries in Alabama (n=450) and Oklahoma (n=403) and
likely voters in the Democratic presidential primaries in Alabama (n=300) and Oklahoma (n=300). The
Republican likely primary voter sample has a margin of error of +4.6 percent in Alabama and of +4.9
percent in Oklahoma. The Democratic likely primary voter sample has a margin of error of +5.7 percent
in Alabama and of +5.7 percent in Oklahoma. The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University
Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.
DATA TABLES
The questions referred to in this release are as follows:
(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)
ALABAMA
OKLAHOMA
42%
19%
16%
11%
5%
0%
7%
35%
22%
23%
7%
8%
1%
4%
(450)
(403)
Donald Trump
Marco Rubio
Ted Cruz
Ben Carson
John Kasich
(VOL) Other
(VOL) Undecided
(n)
R2. Which of the following best describes where your decision stands at this moment: I am
completely decided on which candidate I will support, I have a strong preference right now
but I am willing to consider other candidates, I have a slight preference among a group of
candidates I like, or I am really undecided among a number of candidates?
February 2016
Already voted early
Completely decided
Strong preference
Slight preference
Undecided
ALABAMA
1%
42%
33%
9%
14%
OKLAHOMA
7%
37%
36%
11%
9%
R3. If it came down to the following three candidates, who would you support [NAMES WERE
ROTATED]
February 2016
Donald Trump
Marco Rubio
Ted Cruz
(VOL) No one
(VOL) Undecided
ALABAMA
46%
27%
20%
2%
6%
OKLAHOMA
36%
28%
27%
3%
5%
ALABAMA
14%
9%
74%
2%
OKLAHOMA
15%
10%
74%
1%
************************************************************************
ALABAMA
OKLAHOMA
71%
23%
<1%
6%
43%
48%
1%
8%
(300)
(300)
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders
(VOL) Other
(VOL) Undecided
(n)
D2. Which of the following best describes where your decision stands at this moment: I am
completely decided on which candidate I will support, I have a strong preference right now
but I am willing to consider other candidates, I have a slight preference among a group of
candidates I like, or I am really undecided among a number of candidates?
February 2016
Already voted early
Completely decided
Strong preference
Slight preference
Undecided
ALABAMA
<1%
51%
24%
8%
17%
OKLAHOMA
7%
45%
22%
10%
16%
D3. Who do you think is going to win the Democratic nomination Clinton or Sanders?
February 2016
Clinton
Sanders
(VOL) Dont know
ALABAMA
75%
12%
12%
OKLAHOMA
66%
23%
11%
The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from February 25
to 28, 2016 with statewide random samples of Alabama and Oklahoma voters drawn from a list of registered voters, who
participated in a primary election in 2012 or 2014 or voted in both of the last two general elections, and indicate they will vote
in the presidential primary on March 1, 2016. Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting
and analysis. Final sample is weighted for age and gender based on state registration list information on the pool of potential
voters. Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and Aristotle (voter list). The poll was conducted by live
interviewers in English. The Alabama sample included 450 landline and 300 cell phone interviews. The Oklahoma sample
included 471 landline and 232 cell phone interviews.
Margin of error:
Alabama Republican primary (n=450): +/- 4.6 %
Oklahoma Republican primary (n=403): +/- 4.9 %
Alabama Democratic primary (n=300): +/- 5.7 %
Oklahoma Democratic primary (n=300): +/- 5.7 %
The maximum margin of sampling error is based on a 95% confidence interval (unadjusted for sample design). Sampling error
can be larger for sub-groups. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.
POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)
LIKELY REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS
49% Male
51% Female
ALABAMA
11% 18-34
24% 35-49
34% 50-64
31% 65+
94% White
2% Black
2% Hispanic
2% Other
50% Male
50% Female
OKLAHOMA
10% 18-34
25% 35-49
37% 50-64
28% 65+
92% White
1% Black
2% Hispanic
5% Other
OKLAHOMA
10% 18-34
22% 35-49
37% 50-64
30% 65+
75% White
10% Black
5% Hispanic
10% Other
ALABAMA
15% 18-34
30% 35-49
34% 50-64
21% 65+
42% White
53% Black
4% Hispanic
1% Other
44% Male
56% Female
###