Informative Speech Grading Rubric
Informative Speech Grading Rubric
Informative Speech Grading Rubric
Objective/Criteria
Thesis Statement
Connection with
Audience
Organization &
Subject Knowledge
Credibility
Delivery: Eye
Contact
Delivery: Body
Language
Effectively Accomplished
Effective use of attention-getting
strategy (quote, statistic, question,
story, etc.) to capture listeners
attention and to introduce topic (5)
Speaker clearly formulated and
stated thesis statement to identify
topic and encompass main points
of presentation (5)
Thoughtful audience analysis
reflected through choice of topic
and supporting evidence (5)
Main points are clearly
distinguished from supporting
details; depth of content reflects
knowledge and understanding of
topic; main points adequately
substantiated with timely, relevant
and sufficient support (15)
Sources of information are clearly
identified and establish credibility
(5)
Consistently and effectively used
eye contact to establish rapport
with audience; inconspicuous use
of notes and effective scanning (5)
Expressive, dynamic and natural
use of gestures, posture and facial
expressions; body language
reflects comfort (5)
Performance Indicators
Partially Accomplished
Attention-getting strategy used but
did not seem to adequately capture
audience attention and/or lead to
desired outcome (3)
Thesis was clearly implied but not
explicitly stated (3)
Topic seems somewhat relevant to
audience; vague reference to
audience needs and/or interests (3)
General structure/organization
seems adequate but some blurring
between main and supporting
details; logical flow but no clear
transitions; further explanations
needed to support content (10)
Not Accomplished
No attention-getting strategy was
evident (0)
No thesis statement; main points
are not clearly identified and
audience is unsure of the direction
of the message (0)
Topic seems irrelevant to audience
needs and interests; no attempt
made to connect topic to audience
(1)
Lack of structure; ideas not
coherent and transitions are forced
or blurred; difficult to identify
beginning, middle, end; no support
for ideas; little knowledge gained
by audience (5)
Delivery: Vocals
Closing/Summary
Name: ____________________________________________________
_________
Topic: ____________________________________________________
_________
Comments:
Sources (5 pts.)
_________
_________
_________