Ma 1993
Ma 1993
Ma 1993
H e a t T r a n s f e r w i t h or
C.F. Ma
D.H. Lei
Y.P. Gan
Y.C. Tian
Department of Thermal Science and Engineering, Beijing Polytechnic University, Beijing 100022, China
T. Gomi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sophia University, Tokyo 102, Japan
The p u r p o s e of tlfis p a p e r is to sununaa'ize the impox taalt s t u d i e s m t h e
an'ca
of m a p i n g e m e n t h e a t t r a n s f e r w i t h
or w i t h o u t p h a s e c h a n g e , w i t h e m p h a s i s o n t h e r e s e a r c h c o n d u c t e d at Beijing P o l y t e c l m i c U*fiversity m a i n l y
w i t h circular j e t s . H e a t traalsfer cahna'acteristics of single p h a s e j e t s ~a'e d i s c u s s e d in detail. C o n u n e n t is presented
on boiling h e a t t r a n s f e r of i m p i n g i n g j e t s for s t e a d y nard t r a n s i e n t s t a t e s . Some special c . o l i n g coifflgurations of
t w o - p h a s e j e t s a r e also i n t r o d u c e d .
Keywords: impingement heat transfer, single phase, phase change, steady state, transient state.
INTRODUCTION
As an effective means of providing high heat/mass
transfer rates, impinging jets have been used widely
in industrial cooling or heating processes. It has long
been a subject of great importance both t,o engim.us
of thermal equipment and to heat transfi.'r scientists.
In most cases air is employed a.s the working medium.
The applications of gas jets include temperature control of gas turbine blades, tempering of glass, drying of textiles, veneer, paper and some other materials, annealing of metal and plastic sheets [1] and, more
recently, cooling of electronic equipment [2]. Considerable effort has been devoted to the study of gas
jet impingement and much research o~t this topic has
been published. Comprehensive surveys haw: been
presented by Martin [LJ], Downs and J a l n e s [4] aml
Hrycak[4A].
Recently, incre;Lsed attention ha.s been directed to
the study of liquid jet impingeme.ut, as the heat transfer coefficient can be increased several orders of magnitude in comparison with that of gas jets. Apparently, this heat transfe.r technique is a pronfising candidate for cooling components with very high power
densities encountered in technical process. With liqReceived A u g u s t , 1992.
t I n v i t e d lecttwe p r e s e n t e d by Prof, C.F. M a at the lOth
N a t i o n a l Heat l"h'ansfer Conference of Italy. Gcnova,
J u n e 25-27, 1992
C.F. Ma et al.
Greek Symbols
Nomenclature
specific heat at constant pressure
6y
heater d i a m e t e r
o"
d
h
jet diameter
heat trmlsfer coefl~.cient q / ( T w - T )
heat of vaporization
thermal conductivity
heater length, potential core length
jet number
Nusselt number ( d h / k )
Prandtl munber (p,Cp/k)
heat flux
p
#
"7
S t e f a n B a n t z m a n constant,
surface tension
density
dynanfic viscosity
kinematic viscosity
0
ew
jet angle
wall emissivity
c
d
i
critical
based on diameter a
iuitial boiling
liquid
lnax
o
r
s
t
IJ
nlaxinlunl
s t a g q l a t i o n p o i n t , n o t enhaa~ced
based on radial distm~ce r
sat~u'~tlon
t r a a l s l t i o n to t u r b u l e n t flow
vapol
w.,dl
wp
(7l,
h I~
k
L
n
Nu(Nud)
Pr
q
r
radial distance
r 7.
Re(Red)
T
AT,
ATsub
rio
SINGLE
MENT
PHASE
LIQUID
33
JET
IMPINGE-
1. A n a l y t i c a l R e s e a r c h
Recently, research effort in this area was mainly expended in the study of free-surface jets. Watson [lv]
studied the fluid mechanics of an impinging radial liquid jet by means of b o u n d a r y - l a y e r theory, both for
Subscripts
34
ranges of variables. A prediction for turbulent transition was also included in the analysis. The success
of this analytical work was excellently verified by the
good agreement between the analytical prediction and
the numerical and experimental results reported by
the authors themselves and other investigations [21'22].
Based on Ref.[20] the present authors presented analytical results for local laminar heat transfer with
a circular impinging jet on a horizontal surface at
arbitrary-heat-flux condition (Fig.l). The local Nusself number can be expressed as follows.
(w)
R = 5.147r2/(dRe) + O.17132(d2/r)
(8)
wtler.e
f.z f
7" v
2. E x p e r i m e n t a l R e s e a r c h
Experimental studies have been extensively performed of single-phase liquid jet impingement. Research on circular free-surface and submerged liquid
jets is briefly summarized in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.
"l"T
Ylg.1 D e v e l o p m e n t of t h e b m n l d a r y layer w i t h
i m p i n g i n g liquid circular jet
(1)
where
E--
2 fo qo(~)~d~
(2)
qo(r)r ~-
Nuo = cPr"'Re"
(3)
N u = 0 . 6 6 8 E - ~ / a p r l / a R e ~ / 2 ( r / d ) -~/~"
(4)
rt
\1/3
= (5Or-- - - -5 . 1 4 7 P r )
1"3
/~e /
(5)
N u = 1.5874-113prl/3Rel/3
x(
25.735r 3
~
+ 0.8566) -2j3
(6)
Fso = N u o / R e l / 2 p r 1/3
(i0)
C . F . M a et al.
H e a t T r a n s f e r w i t h or W i t h o u t
Tabl~e 1 Experimental
Authors
Fluid
S t u d i e s of F r e e - s u r f a c e
Jet
Boiling
35
Heat/Mass
Transfer
Heat/Mass
Transfer Result
Surface
[Sarsanti, F a g g i a n :
Water
Single, Vertical,
Unifoorm Heat
a n d G r a s s i fz61
Pr = 3.26-6.04
0 = 90
Flux
N u = O.0136Pr'a:ReSs7
L/d : 5.0-10.6
(1988)
(Lid)o.lo3
d = 10-20 m m ,
z / d = 2.5-10
Re=5.3x
Faggi~ni and
G r a s s i 12~1
Water
Pr=3.8
(199o)
104-2.1
x l0 s
Single,Vertical,
Uniform Heat
8 ---- 90
Flux
Nuo = CPrOtRe"
L = 100 m m
n = 0 . 4 1 7 - 0 . 4 8 3 L o w e r Re
- 8.8!
0 . 6 0 6 - 0 . 9 9 8 H i g h e r Re
d = 17mm
z / d = 0 . 4 7 - 5.0
Re= 2 x 104Grassi and
Water
1.5 x 10 ~
Single,Vertical,
Ui~if,~rm t l e a t
M a g r i n i [271
0 = 90
Flux
(1991)
L / d = 5.9, 10
/ ( F r ) P r 4Re
(z/~)-o
,,~
d = 10.17 m m
fFr presented
z / d = 10, 14, 70
as g r a p h i c
Re= 1 x 103-2.5
x 105
functions
F r = 2 - 160
Stevens a n d
Water
Single, Vertical,
Uniform Heat
Webbi2Sl
0 = 90
Flux
(t990)
15 m m x
d = 2.2 - 8.8 m m ,
Stevens and
Water
103-5
(z/d)
.....
3aO(uld)-O ~3~
x 104
Single,Vertical,
Uniform Heat
Webbl2l
0 = 40 - 90
Flux
N a = A R e a e p*'~*h
(1991)
15 m i n x 8 0
mm
d = 4.6, 9.3 m m ,
Re = 6 . 6
Liu,Lienhard
Water
'4
or
z l d = 0.56 - 18.5
Re=4x
It/d[ _< 3
0 in r a d i a n ;
x 10 a - 5.2 x 104
A, a, p, m , n - c o n s t a n t s
Single,Vertical,
Uniform Heat
and L o m b e r a [241
0 = 90
Flux
Correlations presented
(1991)
Orifize Type
d = 3 . 1 8 , 6.35, 9.5 m m
152 m m
x177 mm
for l a m i n a r t u r b u l e n t
a n d t r a n s i t i o n a l flow
36
T a b l e 1 E x p e r i m e n t i a l S t u d i e s of F r e e - s u r f a c e C i r c u l a r Liquid J e t s ( C o n t i n u e d )
Authors
H e a t / M a s s Transfer H e a t / M a s s T r a n s f e r
Result
S urfac e
Average Heat Transfer
U n i f o r m Wall
N u = 2.65Pr'24Re '4v
Temperature
( D / d )-'es
D / d = 1.7 -- 25.1
for oil
Jet
Fluid
Metzger, Cummings
Water
and R u b y [al
P r = 3.0-4.2
1974
Lubricating
oil
P r = 85-151
Single, Vertical, 0 = 90
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
d = 3.84, 8.18 m m , z / d = 3-24
R e = 2 . 2 x 10 a - l . 2 x 104 for oil
~.4 x 1 0 3 - 1.4 10 s
['or w a t e r
Jiji and
D a g a n [al]
(1986)
FC-77
Water
Y o n e h a r a and
[to [*oI
1983)
Water
Womac. Aharoni
R a m a d h y a n i and
I n c r o p e r a [3~]
(1990)
Ma Zhao, Sun a n d
Gomi I'sl
I1992)
Water
FC~77
H o r i z o n t a l Single J e t and
2 x 2.3 x 3 A r r a y s for p e r h e a t e r
Orifize T y p e Nozzle, d -- 0.51, 1 m m
Re = 2.8 x 103 - 1.2 x 104 for F C - 7 7
1 x 1 0 4 - 2 x 104 for w a t e r
Vertical, Single and 3 x 3
Arrays 8 = 90
Pipe T y p e Nozzle
= 1,4,6,8 mm, z/d = 5
Re = 7.14 103 - 4.81 x 104
Single, Vertical, 0 = 90
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
= 0.457-6.55 m m , z / d = 1 - 10
(#o/#.,,,,)-o.s,
N u = 2.74Pr'4SV Re's4s
( D / d)-'v"(l~o l l~,w ) 's"
for oil a n d w a t e r
Horizontal, Single J e t
Pipe T y p e Nozzle
i = 1 m m , z / d = 2-20
Kerosene
P r -- 20-21, Re -- 50-23000
Transformoil
P r = 260
~ingle J e t , Vertical, 0 = 90
Nakoryakov, P o k u s a ev. and Troyan laal
Pipe T y p e Nozzle
1978)
Rll3
P r = 7-8
U n i f o r m Wall
Temperature
L = 12.7 .mm
Single and
2 x 2.3 x 3 Arrays
U n i f o r m Wall
Temperature
L -- 330 m m
U n i f o r m Wall
Temperature
L = 12.7 m m
N u = 3 . 8 4 P r l / a R e 112
[O.O08(L/d)N + 1]
N u = 2 . 3 8 P r l / S R e 2 / Z ( d / p ) 4/~
for single j e t or j e t arrays
Uniform H e a t F l u x Local H e a t T r a n s f e r
N u = 1 . 2 9 P r l / a R e */z
L=5mm
for z / d < P o t e n t i c a l Core
Local M a s s T r a n s f o r
T a b l e 2 E x p e r i m e n t M S t u d i e d of S u b m e r g e d Circular Liquid J e t s
Authors
Rao and Trass la41
(1964)
Yamamoto, Udagawa
and Suzuki [el
Fluid
Water
Water
(1990)
Smirnov,Verevochkin
and Brdlick [as]
Water
(1961)
Wamac, A h a r o n i ,
Ramadhyani and
Incropera
See Table 1
Ma,Tian,Sun,Lei
and Bergles la6]
Kerosene
P r = 20
Air, N2 Gas
P r -- 0.7
Jet
Single, Vertical, 8 = 90
d = 3.96 m m
z / d -- 0.2-20
Re = 2 . 5 x 1 0 4 - 1.25 l0 s
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
Single, Vertical,0 = 90
d=3mm
z / d in P o t e n t i a l Core
Re = 1 x l0 s - 8 x
l0 s
Single,Horizontal,8 = 90
d = 2.5 - 36.6 m m
z / d = 0.5 - 10
Re = 1.6 1 0 4 - 5
104
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
Heat/Mass Transfer
L = 241 m m
Single,horizontal,8 = 90
d=lmm
z/d-- 1-20 mm
H e a t / M a s s Transfer Result
Local M a s s T r a n s f e r
Sho = O.046Re*'G(z/d)-'
for z / d < 6.5
Sho = O.107Rel'S(z/d)-'s4
Uniform Heat Flux
N u = 0.39Pr'4Re 's
U n i f o r m H e a t Flux
N u = 0.55Re'SPr T M
N u = O.034d'Re'S4Pr '33
exp(-0.037z/d)
for 8 = 90
(1990)
(1988)
Re = 6 x 1 0 2 - 6 x
103
for gas
Re = 1.1 10 z - 1.5 x 104
for ferosene
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
L=5mm
N u , = 1.29Re'SlZprO'S
for K e r o s e n e z / d < 5
N u o = 1 . 2 9 P r ' 4 R e '~
[4.5/Cz/4]s
for gas z / d > 5
C.F. M a e t
el.
37
L i q u i d J e t I m p i n g e m e n t H e a t T r a n s f e r w i t h or W i t h o u t Boiling
Table
Authors
2 E x p e r i m e n t a l Studies of S u b m e r g e d C i r c u l a r L i q u i d J e t s ( c o n t i n u e d )
Fluid
Jet
H e a t / M a s s T r a n s f e r iH e a t / M a s s T r a n s f e r R e s u l t
Surface
M a a n d Bergles Ils~l
Rl13
(1988)
Single, H o r i z o n t a l ,
8 = 90
L=5mm
Nuo = 1.29Pr'4ReS
for z l d < 4.5
d=lmm
Nuo = 1.29Pr'4Re 5
zig= 1.5-21
Re=2.5 x 103-2.9X
[ 4 . 5 / ( z / d ) ] o.o
10 4
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
Ma,Sun,Auracher
T r a n s f o r m e r Oil S i n g l e , H o r i z o n t a l ,
a n d G o m i [sal
Pr=202-210
(199o)
8 = 90
L=Smm
E t h y l e n e Glycol d = l m m
P r = 80 - 127
Nuo = 1.29PrllaReO'S
z / d = 1 - 20
Re:
1.3 x 1 0 2 - 2 . 1
103
for z l d > 8
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
Single,Horizontal,
Water
Sun,Me and
N a k a y a m a Isal
90
Local H e a t T r a n s f o r
L=Smm
d=lmm
(1992)
z/d = 1
Nuo = 1.02Pr'aSSRe s
20
Re =5.1 1 0 3 - 2 . 1
[5/(z/d)]
104
for z l d > 5
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
D = 100 m m
Single,Vertical,
Water
Sitharamayya
d - 1.74 - 12.65 m m
a n d R a j u [a^l
(1969)
z/,i
1.o
Re:2
+0.268( D / d
7.1
o.~
x 10 3 - 4
8 ) R e o's2s]
10 i
P i p e T y p e Nozzle
10 a ,
10 ~
Q R-11s (Pr
7 - a)
102
1o,
!
~
10
10
'"
,../~'~
"
.......
10s
........
air
0.4
nitrogen g ~
water
04
R-113
0.33
kerosene
ethylene
transformer
103
Re
Nu = 1.29Pri/~Re 1/2
10
0 33
0 33
glycol
. . . . . . . .
0 33
oi)
0.33
.....
10'
L,
LOs
i a Ilml[
10~
aleJf[
J l
10~
J JJZJ|
104
Re
Fig.3 Stagnation point beat transfer with impinging
circular free jets of various Ziquids
38
(11)
- -
1.0
x
o.s I
~o~
0
~,
0
~04
3.03
3 77
S.lS
7 06
4,4
6 6
7,8
9.8
10 2
lO ~
102
10 ~
3 4 9 x 102
5.1
--
i, 1801{.id)o5]
v,~.,~o . . . .
{Fr,, Jet)
0.2
[3
~F
5.2
I
3 41 x 102
4 17 102
....
Ethylene
I
8
z/d
flycol
t
12
L
16
I
20
Re,/
300
o
--A--
6 0 x I0~
--C]---~--
8.1 x I0~
1,0 x 104
-"~--
1.2 x
10 4
l.S 104
2.0 x I0"
P00
~50
I00
50
. . . .
. . . .
1o
. . . .
z/d
,s
. . . .
,
20
. . . .
2s
C.F. Ma et al.
39
1.0
(r/d)
SOD
7.49
~,
e, x
P02 \
~F
E]
~.
,~'
0.8
5-30
Free jet(
3.57X
10.13
I~ I
~ 0.6
;~
~
~ 0.4
9.92
12.51
333XlO
5.03 x 102
6 . 4 0 x 102
8 . 4 4 x 102
10'
6.67 x I0 ~
(Trelnsformer oil)
0
~t
4.54
.4.65
O~0
O
0
8.70
9.68
14.67
&
3.47 X 10 ~"
3.61 x 102
6.87 x 102
8.69 X 10 ~"
1.39 X 103
0.2
6-~>-~:':~.~y.
300
KeroemJe Re
200
4130
10
12
14
r/d
@. . . .
Fig.6
-4k
I
zld
..,&
A .& i i ~
I t I
l0
hlho = ( , l a ) -
(0.SS /a)
tan h
for
hlho
r/d
< 2.5
(12)
1.49(r/d) -L25
for
r/d
> 2.5
(13)
The two correlations were obtained based on a simplified analysis and can predict the local heat transfer
behaviour quite well for submerged jets with Prandtl
number ranging from 5 to 260 [3s'39].
For free-surface liquid jets Stevens and Webb 12s]
studied the local Nusselt number characteristics systematically with water as working fluid. It was found
that the local heat transfer profiles exhibit a region of
constant Nu in the radial direction with r/d =0-0.75.
It was also noted that the normalized heat transfer distribution Nu/Nuo is nearly independent of Reynolds
number before transition to turbulent flow. It can be
expressed by an empirical equation,
Nu/Nuo =
{1 + [a
e~>("/d)]-9} -1/9
(14)
(rt/d)Re 0"422 =
1.2 x 103
(15)
40
59
300
~-
9,9
16x
--0--
10 z
lO ~
2 ] lO '~
o.
200
tO 3
x
24x
z/d
I0 ~
= 4
100[
0
"-
-2
,I
10
12
14
16
18
r/d
(16)
C.F. Ma et al.
41
It is interesting to note t h a t the same optimal configuration for cooling electronic components was recommended in the two investigations: each chip is cooled
by 16 circular jets with diameter smaller than 0.5 mm.
Using a modified form of Martins correlation, Maddox and Bar-Cohen [46] studied the parametric sensitivities and design considerations in submerged liquid
jet impingement and defined configurations that are
best suited to the cooling of electronic components.
140
12
o~O
120
~
A
60
60=
4o j
i
20
-16
0~3
200 47
L~ 0 61
366 08
17 84
0.8
o
c~
0.4
Ca)
,/d(=)
717
184 42
2604?
961
36608
17.64
6~4 oe
~1~ o
%
20 ~
P~%,,,
$ 30
~.~ 0
-6
(~
614 06
,~:0
o~O~
-I0
717"
~(.~
0,8
0
.
O:
1.0
0% o r ~ ?
~o~
194 42
o~%
is 20
U(,n/,) Re
A'~
[1
0
100
U(m#)
10
0.0'
-15
20
16
~
-10
t
-6
Cb)
10
t~IL7
15
20
,'/aC=)
180
1.2
140
120
8.29*
284 34
X
0
T 41
'10.24
SSS.O0
408.68
,,.
..s,
I00
=s
ao
~2
o ~o
tO.~J7 ~JOaS.O|
0 0
oOO OO
~ 0
is 2O
/~Cd
234 94
08
\
0
F 41
10 24
333 O0
438 68
12,28
,O 37
e28 38
1033 08
O.S
C0 0x XOO
880 o
o,
t3~O
02
20
0
-25
c)
0 'a'0 x , ~ X ~ ( O
O.'~A 0 x ~ u ~ ~1~
0 x O
0,~0
eo
40
10
oLeO
-20
-15
-10
-6
(-)
,-/,~(=)
10
O0 [
-25
15
J
-20
A
-15
i
-10
I
-5
(b)
rld(x )
401
40,
t~g
$
~lD
t5:3e
,~0
10--
102
t'
o "
0o
"
A
t
O
90
80
70
60
50
40
103
,--
i:
1'0 2
1
R.e
90
75
60
45
_L.JALI
10 3
10
15
42
Uo = 2.04n~ - I
AT0,6 = 12.5'C
Test lection No.14
~J
Incre~ingpower
104 Single p h u o
od
convection
10
~2
~4
16
'
P~rt
al boiling
18
'
20
'
~-u~()'
--~-bodmg
22
'
24
'
Tw - T,(C)
Fig.12 Variation of heat transfer coefficient in
the process of Impingement boiling[G]
JET
WITH
IMPINGEMENT
PHASE
HEAT
TRANSFER
CHANGE
1. C r i t i c a l H e a t F l u x w i t h J e t I m p i n g e m e n t
Critical heat flux (CHF) was a main concern of the
early work in the area of jet impingement boiling. Research on this topic is still very active internationally. Since the first paper published in 1974 [471, Profs.
Monde, Katto and their colleagues have performed
very extensive experiments with single and nmltiple
jets resulting in a systematic data base of CHF with jet
impingement [4s]. Based on the hydrodynamic model
for the CHF mechanism proposed by Haramura and
Katto [49], Monde [5] developed an analytical equation
for CHF without any empirical constants:
q~/p,,Hlqu
0.220(pL/p,,)o ~,~3
(17)
Taking the dimensionless groups in Eq.{17} into account, Monde [sl'~2I analyzed the existing data and
gave a set of equations to predict CHF in vaxious
regimes. More recently, Monde and Inoue [531 extended
the correlations for single jets to the case of multiple jets, and found that CHF data for multiple jets
can be correlated with an accuracy of 20% by the
correlations. Besides the contributions by Monde and
Katto et al, this subject has attracted considerable attention internationally. Based on the mechanical energy stability criterion [54], Lienhard[ 54-5G] presented
a continuous correlation in conjunction with the data
reported by Monde and Katto [4s]. Mudawar and
Wadsworth [57] reported extensive experimental data
for CHF from a simulated chip to a confined rectangular impinging jet of FC-72.
2 Jet Impingement Nucleate Boiling
Ruch and Holman [5s] experimentally studied boiling heat transfer to a Rl13 circular jet impinging
upwards onto a heated surface. Experimental measurements of the wall temperature were obtained in
nucleate and" film boiling regimes. T h e y concluded
that nucleate boiling was independent of the jet velocity (1.23-6.87 m/s), nozzle diameter (0.21-0.43 ram),
and heater orientation (0-45 degrees). A generalized
correlation of nucleate boiling was presented. Experiments on impingement boiling were performed at I o w a
State University in the early 1980's [s9'6]. Measurements of heat flux were made with single submerged
Rl13 jets (1 mm diameter) impinging onto a vertical
heater (5 x 5 ram) in saturated and subcooled conditions. Characteristics of boiling heat transfer, including incipient, partial and fully developed nucleate
boiling~ were examined in detail. Variation of the h e a t
transfer coefficient in the boiling process is illustrated
in Fig.12. Boiling hysteresis can be clearly observed.
An incipient boiling point is recorded at a superheat
of about 20C for increasing power. When the heat
flux is decreased, boiling persis,,ts until a superheat of
about 17C is reached. For purpose of characterizing
the surface, the latter "incipient boiling point" is of
interest since it represents stable and established boiling behavior. Several tests were run with the nozzle
displaced so that the measuring station was located
in the wall jet region (parallel flow) rather than a t
the stagnation point (normal flow). The ~xperimentally determined incipient boiling points for both the
normal and parallel flows are plotted in Fig.13. The
theoretical basis for the inception of nucleate boiling
was presented by Bergles and Rohsenow [611 and Davis
and Anderson I6'l. Kim [G3I showed that the following relationships are accurate for Rl13 at atmospheric
pressure.
For the case where active nucleation sites of all sizes
are present:
q" ~ --
h/tic,
8T~wVlgG
(T~
T,) 2
(18)
For the case where active nucleation sites of equivalent radii less than r are present:
TJ"JVI'qZa/~t
hlgr2c
(19)
where
~.,., =
The
experimentally
(T~
- T,.)I2
determined
incipient boiling
C.F. Ma et al.
43
0:,
i!
/'i'71.
10e
9
~"
..
./,'/
R5
/i7,7
&--.
,
E
l0 s ~ /
101
"
#
I
I
,'
I
!
I
I
I
l
I; o !
0
---
Normal flow
Paxallel flow
Equation{18)
Equation{19)
0.6~
rc= i
i0 x
Fig,IS
11"
~'~/ ~
2
o^
6 / 8 / 8 3 R2
1.08
A^
Av
I
,
3
4
Tw - To(C)
Increasing power
Decreasing power
~
5
l l i f
6 7 8 9 10-~
I
I
IP.I
~"
6/s/ssRx
l,. , ot
Io
///
//;/:7
T u t u c t , o n No. 12
I/
I
I
2
3
T~ - T,{"C)
I
4
u-- 10 05m/s
I
5 83m/s
Order
Flow Date Number of U~ AT.~,
D:rection (1083) Operation (m/s) "C
P
Oct 0
R5
10.05 12 5
Oct 9
R6
10 05 12 5
R9
Oct g
R7
5.8
Oct 9
Oct. 0
R8
R9
10 5
10
Increasing
Decreumg
power
power
4i
I~.5
5 83 12 S
VT
o o 1~o O l
N Normal flow
P Paralletflow
910 ~
T,, - T,(K)
44
Nu~,v = hr/kv
3. J e t I m p i n g e m e n t Film Boiling
Film boiling with Rl13 jets has been studied experimentally for steady/ssl and transient [67'6s] states. It
was demonstrated in both investigations that the heat
transfer with jet impingement film boiling is proportional to the square root of jet velocity. This result is
consistent with the analytical research conducted at
Beijing Polytechnic University [69].
Using similarity and quasi-similarity methods and
integral techniques, Ma and Zhao and their colleagues
presented simplified.physical models to predict film
boiling heat transfer both in the stagnation zone and
the wall jet zone. The following equations were obtained for steady film boiling with circular jets impinging on horizontal heated surfaces:
In the stagnation zone,
C,,,AT. (Nu,t.,,)4
hf.qp,~ \ ~ 1
[htSrsu b - e a(t~, - Tta)JRe~(,y ( Nun.,, ] a
p,,uhy: 1
\ Rot., , }
Rer,v = ur/~l
h, = (3/Ir)'5(kt/r)Prl/2Re~(t 2
In the case of high subcooling, the two equations
can be simplified with reasonable accuracy:
Nun,,, = ( 2 / r ) ' 5 ( k , / k , , ) ( A T s u b / A T o ) P r ,
\~--ff~6~.51
1/6(pt/pv} =
where
Nua,.=
hd/k,,,
Rea,~ = ud/.~,,
h, = ( 2 / r ' S ) ( R t / d ) P r l / : R e ~ J 2
In the wall jet zone
Cp,,,AT,
hf,gpr, v
( Nua.,'~ 4
p-'-fi':b-T.5]
\ Re,.,',,
4
1/2
p~,uh.r o
Nud,.)
R,o2
--3/64r/(r) = 0
where
3/4(N~.,,/R~.5) 2
(21)
1/2
Reu, ,
N u n = (3/r) '5(k,/k,, ) ( A T s u b / A T , ) ( d / r ) P r l / 2 R e l ! ,
for wall jet zone
(22)
2
(23)
Nud,v = [ 1 / 6 ( h y g / C p v A T s )
(pt/p,,)Pr~]
1 / 4 n 1/2
(24)
l~ed, v
4. T r a n s i e n t J e t I m p i n g e m e n t
(20)
1/2
Boiling
C.F. Ma et al. Liquid Jet Impingement Heat Transfer with or Without Boiling
45
and early appearance of the minimum heat flux. Maximum heat flux was also much increased in comparison
with pool boiling, but lower than that for steady impinging jets [67]. Consequently, the transition boiling
portion of the boiling curves was also increased and
shifted to the right. Meanwhile, a right shift of the
nucleate boiling portion was observed, probably resulting also from the vapor residue on the surface in
the rapid cool-down process.
lO s
v. = 2.68m/J
AT.~b = I.$K
10
I le~l
tO
, III
100
(&)
I000
Tw- T,(K)
rI* "'-.o..
~'.--.~.~
106
A
V, = 3 . 4 Z m / s
10
,,I
AT.t,6 = 1.0K
f ! Zll~
I !
Itl
lO00
I00
(b)
T,. - To(K)
5. G a s - L i q u i d J e t a n d G a s J e t in L i q u i d P o o l
Cooling of hot surfaces by impinging atomized liquid is an effective technique widely used in a variety
of industrial processes. A comprehensive review has
been made by Bolle and Moureaul7]. Yao et allZll
reported their research on impacting spray boiling of
FC-72. They found that spray heat transfer appeared
to be m,Lch more effective than pool boiling: the peak
heat flux was 2 or 3 times higher than that with pool
boiling, and the temperature overshoot with boiling
incipience seemed to be entirely eliminated. A modified spray cooling technique has been developed at
Beijing Polytechnic University since 1987. It is characterized by high velocity of impacting gas with water droplets and small nozzle-to-plate spacing [12'71].
Heat flux as high as 4 106 w / m 2 has been recorded at
a moderate wall temperature of 64 C with simulated
micro-chips (5 x 5 mm). In comparison with jet impingement cooling this technique call provide a more
uniform heat transfer performance to avoid significant
variation in the surface temperature. Fig.17 shows
horizontal distributions of local heat transfer coefficients with two different nozzle-to-plate spacings at
constant heat flux, gas velocity and liquid flow rate.
The superior performance of heat transfer resulted
6 ~
q = 5.67 x 105(W/m 2)
i
t~
zf o 1.5 (ram)
k A 5.0 ( r a m )
5 , ~
a..~|~
~E
I0 a
~
~.-~
----~._ ~ .
~ . : 3.02m/s
A T . ~ = 26.8K
I
I
105
10
! t Illl
!
100
(c)
I |il
lO(m
T,(K)
-0.5
I1
r (ran,)
46
Kerosene
qH= 8.17 x
10
- - NI
104Wlm 2
/
/ , ,
,,
,:y'_"
_.
1o
1.s
10
20
80
40
50
60
2.0
I
70
80
U(ml,)
Fig.19 Heat transfer with nitrogen gas jet impingement in
kerosene pool [73]
SUMMARY
10 5
'.
,,or/,,/,.
~;
f/.
' d /
10 4
".
"
7,(oc)
280
28.0
28.0
28.0
27.6
27.6
27.3
u0 (m/,]
A 0.76
V
1.43
C] 2.37
I
f
G
3.31
<1 6.10
~> 6.89
8.96
11.76
13.37
14.43
16.48
z / d = 1.0
2
- 21
",
-10
L"
0
10
20
T,~
....
26,6
25.0
24.0
23.2
21.6
23.0
9.33
30
40
T~('C)
50
C . F . M a et al.
configulations of two-phase jets can also provide excellent performance of heat dissipation at high power
densities. As viable candidates, they should attract
attention from more researchers.
[14]
47
48
[31]
[32]
[33]
I34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
I38]
(1990).
[39] Sun, H., Ms, C.F. and Nakayama, W., "Local Characteristics
of Convective Heat Transfer from Simulated Microelectronic
Chips to Impinging Submerged Round Water Jets," Subnfitted to J Electromc Packing.
[39A] Sitharmnayya, S. and Raju, K.S., "Heat Transfer Between an
Axisynunetric Jet and A Plate Held NormM to the Flow,"
The Canadaan J. of Chemical Eng~neemng, 47, pp.365-368,
(1969).
[40] Sun, H., Ma, C.F., Bergles, A.E. and Nakaymna, W , "Local
Heat Transfer frona Small Heaters to Inapinging Submerged
Axisymmetric Jets of Seven Fluids with P r a n d t l Number
[Lunging from 0.7 to 351," to be Subnfitted to Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer, (1992).
[41] Vader, D.T., Incropera, F.P. said Viskanta, R., "Local Heat
Trnaasfer from a Heated Smface to aaa lanpinging P l a n a r Jet of
Water," Int J. Heat Mass Transfer, 34, No.3, pp.611-623,
(1991).
[42] Gardon, R. and Cobonpue, J., "Heat Transfer Between a Flat
aaxd Jets of Air h n p m i n g on It," International Developments
ill Heat Transfer, pp.454-460, ASME, New York, {1962)
[43] McM~u'ray, D.C , Myers, P S and Uyelmra, O A , "Influence
of Impinging Jet Variables on Local Heat Traaasfel Coefficients Along a Flat Surface W i t h Constant Heat Flux," Proc.
3rd Int. Heat Transfer Colff., 2, 292-299, (1966).
[44] Sparrow, E.M. mad Lovell, B.J., "Heat Transfer Cliaraeterics
of an Obliquely Impinging Circular Jet," J. Heat Transfer,
102, pp.202-209, (1980).
[45] Goldstein, R.T. a n d b'Yanchett, M.E., "Heat Traalsfer from a
Flat Sm'face to an Oblique hnpinging Jet," J. Heat Transfer,
110, pp.84-90, (1988).
[46] Maddox, D.E a n d Bnx-Cohen, A., "Thennofluid Design of
Submerged Jet lanpinging Cooling for Electrouic Components," ASME H T D - 1 7 1 , pp.71 80, (1991).
[47] Katto, Y., and Monde, M., "Study of Mechanism of B u r n out in a High H e a t - F h t x Boiling System with a n Impinging
Jet," Proc. %th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., P a p e r No.B6.2,
pp.245-249, (1974).
[48] Monde, M., "Critical Heat Flux in Saturated Forced Convection Boiling on a Heated Disk with One or Multiple Impinging Jets," Trend in Heat and Mass Transfer, (1992).
[49] Haramm'a, Y., mid Katto, Y., "A New Hydrodynamic Model
of Cntical Heat Flux Applicable Widely to Both Pool an
dForced Convection Boiling on Submerged Bodies in Satur a t e d Liquids," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 26, pp.389--399,
(1983).
[50] Monde, M., "Critical Heat Flux in Saturated Forced Convecrive Boiling on A Heated Disk with a n Impinging J e t - A New
GenerMized Correlation," Warme-ua-xd Stoffubertragtmg, 19,
pp.205-210, (1985).
[51] Monde, M., mid Okluna, Y., "Critical Heat Flux in Saturated Forced Convective Boiling on a Heated Disk with An
Impinging J e t - C H F in L-regime," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 28, pp.547-552, (1985).
[52] Monde, M., "Critical Heat Flux in Saturated Forced Convection Boiling on a Heated Disk with an Impinging Jet," J.
Heat Transfer, 109, pp.991-996, (1987).
[53] Monde, M., aaad Inove, T , "Critical Heat Flux in Saturated
Forced Convective Boiling on a Heated Disk with Multiple
Impinging Jets," J. Heat Transfer, 113, No.3, (1991).
[54] Lienhard, J H. and Eiclflmnl, R., "On Predicting Boiling
B , u n o u t for Heaters Cooled by Liquid Jets," Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer, 22, pp 774-776, (1979).
[55] Lienhard, J.H. and Haseal, M.Z., "Con'elation of Burnout
Data for Disk Heaters Cooled by Liquid Jets," .7. Heat Transfer, 101, pp.383-384, (1979)
[56] Sliaxan, A. and Lienliard, J.H., "On Predicting Burnout in
the Jet-disc Config~lration," J. Heat Transfer, 107, pp.398-401, (1985).
[57] Mudawar, I. and Wadsworth, D.C., "Critical Heat Flux from
a Sinmlated Chip to a Confined Rectangular Impinging Jet
of Dmlectxic Liquid," Ir, t. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 34, No.6,
I)P 1465 1479, (1991).
[58] Ruch, M.A. and Holman, J.P., "Boiling Heat Transfer to a
l ~ ' e o o n - l l 3 Jet Impinging Upward onto a Flat Heated Surface," Int. J Heat Mass Transfer, 18, pp.51--60, (1975).
[59] Ms, C.F. and Bergels, A.E., "Boiling J e t Impingement Cooling of Simulated Mieroelectronic Chips," Heat Transfer in
Electronic Equipment-1983, H T D - 2 8 , pp.5-12, ASME, New
York, (1983).
[60] Ma, C.F. a n d Bergles, A E , "Jet Impingement Nucleate Boiling," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 29, No.8, pp.1095-1101,
(1986).
[61] Bergles, A.E. aald Rohsenow, W.M., "The Determination of
Forced-Convection Surface-Boiling Heat Transfer," J. Heat
Transfer, 86, pp.365-372, (1964).
[62] Davis, E.J and Anderson, G.H., "The Incipience of Nucleate
Boding in Forced Convection Flow," A ICheE J., 12, pp.774780, (1966).
[63] Kiln. C J., "Structm'cd Surfaces for E n h a n c e d Nucleate Boiling," M.S. Thesas m Meclxauical Engineering, Iowa State University Ames, I a , [1985)
[64] V.H. Del Valle M. and Kemfing, D.B.R., "Subcooled Flow
Boilihg at High Heat Flux," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 28,
pp.1907-1920, (1985).
[65] Duke, E.E. and Sehrock, V.E., "Void Volume, Site Density
and Bubble Size for Subcooled Nucleate Pool Boiling," Proceedings of the 1961 Heat Tra~lsfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, pp.130-145, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Ca.,
(1961).
[66] Struble, C.L. and Witte, C., " E m i t t e r - B a s e Voltage Measm'ement Technique for J e t Nucleate Boiling on Power "IYan-
C.F. Ma et al.
49
[70] Bolle, L. and Moureau, J.C., "Spray Coohng of Hot Surfaces," Multiphase Science and Teelmology, Edited by Hewitt, G.F. et al, 1, p.1, Hemisphere, (1982).
[71] Ma, C.F. and Zhao, D.S., "Cooling Teehuiques for Electronic m~d Microelectronic Equipment-Chinese Research,"
Keynote Lecture, The ICHMT 20th Symposium, Dubrovnik
Yugoslavia, (1988).
[72] Bergles, A.E. and Ma, C.F., "Gas Jet Ilnpingement Means
and Method," USA Patent, Nmnber 4741385, (1988).
[73] Tim~, Y.C., Ma, C.F., Lee, C.S. and Lei, D.H., "Enhanced
Heat Transfer From Simulated Microchips to Surrounding
Liquid of Low Volatility with Gas Jet Impingement," Advances in Phase Change Heat Trmlsfer, Edited by Xin, M.,
Inten~ational Academic Publishers (A Permnon-CNPIEC
Joint Venture), pp.419-424, (1988).