Economics in A Watershed
Economics in A Watershed
Economics in A Watershed
Watershed protection is the main goal and idea behind this discussion, but how much
does it cost? What effect do these changes bring economically to these developing
regions and communities, landowners and residents? This question is brought up in every
debate regarding watershed protection, as changes cant be made without capital. There
are many economic benefits of protecting a watershed. Investing in the future of a
watershed may have high upfront cost but in turn it will actually be cost affective in
regards to water treatment.
In a study of 27 US water suppliers, researchers found that protecting forested
watersheds used for drinking water sources can reduce capital, operational and
maintenance costs for drinking water treatment. They found that watersheds with
greater percentages of protected forest correlate to fewer water treatment
expenditures
You maybe thinking, what does protecting forested land have to do with a watershed? It
has been proven that land with high retention in natural green infrastructure actually
minimizes property damage and cleanup costs from flood damage. When land is covered
by forested type terrain, it prevents runoff from moving rapidly across the landscape and
allows it to slowly infiltrate into the soil, reducing erosion and high flows. A healthy
watershed will reduce the area and impact of a flood, minimize the economic burden on
public infrastructure, reduce erosion and water treatment costs and can restore natural
groundwater recharge.
Naranpur
As stated earlier the water quality is extremely poor in Narapur. Although many agree
they want to fix this issue or find a way to continue their current lifestyle they cant. The
population is concerned with growing crops to use for feed or person family use. These
villagers continue to use fertilizers and pesticides which is a main driving force behind
the water quality. For many years now there has been talk that there is a direct link
between water and air quality to human health. Urbanization has negative impacts on
river and stream water quality and associated economic benefits. This is a major issue we
have dealt with in Naranpur. When government or a community voice pursues a water
quality improvement policy, for example regulation of polluting which could include
implementation of urban land use controls. There is always winners and loser when a
policy is enacted. Losses are typically straightforward as it may reduce ones profits and
increase consumers cost. Gains on the other hand are often more difficult to measure,
especially when they come in the form of public goods such as water quality.
Sources:
http://www.dw.com/en/how-much-is-pollution-costing-chinas-economy/a-18323476
http://www.homerdixon.com/projects/state/chinaeco/pollut.htm
http://web.missouri.edu/ikerdj/papers/Wisconsin%20-%20Water%20Pollution
%20Depletion.htm
http://www.eldis.org/go/home&id=33800&type=Document#.VikKV4SYeLI