Cathodic Complexities: John Bollinger, Farwest Corrosion Control Company, USA
Cathodic Complexities: John Bollinger, Farwest Corrosion Control Company, USA
Cathodic Complexities: John Bollinger, Farwest Corrosion Control Company, USA
CATHODIC
COMPLEXITIES
ften customers ask to have a sacrificial magnesium anode cathodic protection
(CP) system designed for their new pipeline system. In many cases, however, the
customer does not understand the many complexities that can profoundly affect
the design and long-term operation of the CP system. Mistakenly, they think that
the application of a few magnesium anodes along the length of the pipeline will offer sufficient
protection but unfortunately, this is usually not the case.
In designing any CP system for a buried pipeline, there are a number of factors that must be
considered. These factors are even more critical when considering a sacrificial anode system,
which cannot be adjusted to provide additional CP if needed. Therefore, a robust design approach
and careful installation techniques are a must if the CP system is to provide the expected results.
Otherwise, the integrity of the pipeline may be at stake for a number of reasons described later.
As mentioned above, there are many design elements to be considered that include pipeline
coating type, coating effectiveness or efficiency, electrical isolation of the pipeline, soil resistivity
and moisture content, operating temperatures of the pipeline, cathodic interference, induced
AC voltages from power lines, lightning strikes, operational issues caused by pigging or similar, and
the required service life of the CP system.
107
WP_107-110_April2012.indd 107
27/03/2012 09:49
Electrical isolation
Coating efficiencies
The basis of any CP design requires knowledge, or a competent
estimate, of the amount (area) of bare steel that will be exposed
to the soil. In a perfect scenario, a pipeline would have a 100%
flawless coating. If this were possible, there would be no need
for CP as there would be zero contact of the steel with the
earth and therefore no possibility of corrosion.
This is an unrealistic expectation due to the inevitable
nicks, scratches (called coating holidays) and possibly less
than perfectly coated field joints. Therefore, it is up to the
CP designer to estimate the coating efficiency for the pipeline
in order to calculate the amount of CP current needed to
adequately protect the pipeline.
As an example, how does a 99% efficient coating sound?
The vast majority of people might agree that a 99% efficient
coating would be a relatively good effort. However, consider
a requirement or specification to coat a structure that is
10 ft x 10 ft, or 100 ft2 in total. A 99% efficient coating would
mean that 1 ft2 of the surface area was missed and is now bare.
In the authors opinion, a new coating with even 99.9% coverage
should be considered unacceptable.
108
WP_107-110_April2012.indd 108
27/03/2012 09:49
Cathodic interference
Cathodic interference is caused by stray CP current from
foreign cathodically protected pipelines interfering with the
subject pipeline. These protected foreign pipelines, which
include crossing and parallel pipelines, can cause cathodic
interference with a new, well coated pipeline. In this instance,
when this stray current finds and then leaves the pipeline, severe
damage can occur at any location where a holiday or defect in
the coating exists. For this reason, the new, well coated pipeline
is very sensitive to the effects of stray current.
In a perfect world, the more distance between these
pipelines would be better but unfortunately, this is not usually
possible. Therefore, solutions such as anode drain stations,
shielding or, as a last resort, resistance bond stations can be
installed to control and eliminate the effects of cathodic
interference.
The CP design
It is an essential requirement that any sacrificial magnesium
anode system should include more than the minimum
anode requirements to obtain adequate CP current over the
specified design life of the system. While some may consider
the additional anodes to be overly cautious and expensive,
it is important to remember that the cost to mobilise labour,
equipment and materials in the future will be many times
greater versus the cost to install the additional CP anodes
during pipeline construction.
WP_107-110_April2012.indd 109
109
27/03/2012 09:49
Additional recommendations
Figure 4. Pipeline electrically shorted to rebar.
Conclusion
110
WP_107-110_April2012.indd 110
27/03/2012 09:49