This document outlines the assessment criteria for an individual oral examination and interactive oral examination in language B for the IB Diploma Programme. It describes the levels of achievement for command of spoken language, fluency, accuracy, variety of language used, and use of intonation to aid communication. It also describes the levels of achievement for understanding and interactive skills, including the ability to express and present ideas clearly and coherently and maintain the flow of conversation. The criteria are scored on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 5 points depending on the examination type.
This document outlines the assessment criteria for an individual oral examination and interactive oral examination in language B for the IB Diploma Programme. It describes the levels of achievement for command of spoken language, fluency, accuracy, variety of language used, and use of intonation to aid communication. It also describes the levels of achievement for understanding and interactive skills, including the ability to express and present ideas clearly and coherently and maintain the flow of conversation. The criteria are scored on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 5 points depending on the examination type.
This document outlines the assessment criteria for an individual oral examination and interactive oral examination in language B for the IB Diploma Programme. It describes the levels of achievement for command of spoken language, fluency, accuracy, variety of language used, and use of intonation to aid communication. It also describes the levels of achievement for understanding and interactive skills, including the ability to express and present ideas clearly and coherently and maintain the flow of conversation. The criteria are scored on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 5 points depending on the examination type.
This document outlines the assessment criteria for an individual oral examination and interactive oral examination in language B for the IB Diploma Programme. It describes the levels of achievement for command of spoken language, fluency, accuracy, variety of language used, and use of intonation to aid communication. It also describes the levels of achievement for understanding and interactive skills, including the ability to express and present ideas clearly and coherently and maintain the flow of conversation. The criteria are scored on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 5 points depending on the examination type.
How successfully does the student use the language in speech?
How fluent and clear is the students speech? How accurate and varied is the language used? How much does the students intonation aid communication? Marks 0
Level descriptor The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
12
Command of spoken language is limited.
The production of language is hesitant and not always comprehensible. Language is often incorrect and/or limited. Intonation interferes with communication.
34
Command of spoken language is fairly good.
The production of language is comprehensible and fluent at times. Language is sometimes correct, with some idiomatic expressions. Intonation does not interfere seriously with communication.
56
Command of spoken language is good.
The production of language is mostly fluent. Language is generally correct, varied and idiomatic. Intonation contributes to communication.
78
Command of spoken language is very good.
The production of language is fluent, with a touch of authenticity. Language is accurate. Intonation enhances communication.
910
Command of spoken language is excellent.
The production of language is fluent and generally authentic. Language is varied and idiomatic. Intonation enhances communication.
To what extent does the student understand and demonstrate an ability to interact in a conversation?
How well can the student express simple and complex ideas? How well can the student maintain a conversation?
Marks 0
Level descriptor The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
12
Simple ideas are understood with difficulty and interaction is limited.
Simple ideas and opinions are presented with difficulty, sometimes incoherently. The conversation does not flow coherently.
34
Simple ideas are understood fairly well and interaction is acceptable.
Simple ideas and opinions are generally presented clearly. The conversation flows coherently at times but with some lapses.
56
Simple ideas are understood well and interaction is good.
Simple ideas and opinions are presented clearly and coherently; there is some difficulty with complex ideas. The conversation generally flows coherently.
78
Complex ideas are understood well and interaction is very good.
Both simple and complex ideas and opinions are generally presented clearly, coherently and effectively. The conversation flows coherently.
910
Complex ideas are understood very well and interaction is excellent.
Complex ideas and opinions are presented clearly, coherently and effectively. The conversation flows coherently in a natural manner.
