Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Waugh, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a defendant seeking to appeal a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Waugh, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a defendant seeking to appeal a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-05-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7853

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a defendant seeking to appeal a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Waugh, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from a defendant seeking to appeal a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7853

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEVIN A. WAUGH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-95-30-A, CA-96-1529-AM)
    Submitted:

    May 1, 1997

    Decided:

    May 8, 1997

    Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kevin A. Waugh, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Cameron Alexander, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Waugh, Nos. CR-95-30-A; CA-96-1529-AM (E.D.
    Va. Oct. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like