Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Kenneth Hawkins' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Kenneth Hawkins' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Kenneth Hawkins' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Kenneth Hawkins' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7691

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KENNETH HAWKINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-94-32, CA-96-2098-8-13)
    Submitted:

    October 7, 1997

    Decided:

    October 28, 1997

    Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kenneth Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Hawkins, Nos. CR-94-32; CA-96-2098-8-13
    (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like