Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Quick v. Wake County Detention, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wilbert Donnell Quick filed a § 1983 complaint against Wake County Detention Facility, a doctor, and the sheriff alleging violations related to his medical care. The district court denied relief and Quick appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its April and June 2006 orders. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Quick v. Wake County Detention, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    29 views2 pages
    Wilbert Donnell Quick filed a § 1983 complaint against Wake County Detention Facility, a doctor, and the sheriff alleging violations related to his medical care. The district court denied relief and Quick appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its April and June 2006 orders. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7235

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Wilbert Donnell Quick filed a § 1983 complaint against Wake County Detention Facility, a doctor, and the sheriff alleging violations related to his medical care. The district court denied relief and Quick appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its April and June 2006 orders. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    29 views2 pages

    Quick v. Wake County Detention, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wilbert Donnell Quick filed a § 1983 complaint against Wake County Detention Facility, a doctor, and the sheriff alleging violations related to his medical care. The district court denied relief and Quick appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its April and June 2006 orders. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7235

    WILBERT DONNELL QUICK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WAKE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY/MEDICAL; DOCTOR
    UMESI; DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00755-D)

    Submitted:

    December 21, 2006

    Decided:

    January 3, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wilbert Donnell Quick, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wilbert Donnell Quick appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Quick v.

    Wake County Detention Facility, No. 5:05-CT-00755-D (E.D.N.C. Apr.


    11 & June 30, 2006).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like