Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Howell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It states that Donnie Keith Howell sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Howell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It states that Donnie Keith Howell sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7199

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It states that Donnie Keith Howell sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Howell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It states that Donnie Keith Howell sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7199

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DONNIE KEITH HOWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CR-94-56-H)

    Submitted:

    December 12, 2001

    Decided:

    December 20, 2001

    Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Donnie Keith Howell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donnie Keith Howell seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001)
    and his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts orders and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States

    v. Howell, No. CR-94-56-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2000 & Dec. 14, 2000).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like