Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Hughes v. Hutchinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jackie Hughes filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. Hughes appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Hughes v. Hutchinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Jackie Hughes filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. Hughes appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7087

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Jackie Hughes filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. Hughes appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Hughes v. Hutchinson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jackie Hughes filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied relief. Hughes appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7087

    JACKIE HUGHES,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD HUTCHINSON,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-00-3103)

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2001

    Decided:

    November 16, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jackie Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jackie Hughes seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. See Hughes v. Hutchinson, No. CA00-3103 (D. Md. June 15, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like