Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Warren v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Leonard Warren of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Warren v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Leonard Warren of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6279

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Leonard Warren of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Warren v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Leonard Warren of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6279

    CHARLES LEONARD WARREN,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    W. K. JONES, Superintendent,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
    (CA-96-948-HC-BR)
    Submitted:

    July 24, 1997

    Decided:

    August 6, 1997

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles Leonard Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Warren v. Jones, No. CA-96-948-HC-BR
    (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like