Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Gregory Hines' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2013 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Gregory Hines' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2013 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7918

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Gregory Hines' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2013 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Gregory Hines' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2013 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7918

    GREGORY S. HINES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA; HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC,
    Director;
    EBP
    ISRAEL
    HAMILTON,
    Re-Entry
    Institutional
    Program Manager; JEFFERY ARTRIP, Unit Manager D. Bldg; TORI
    RAIFORD, Counselor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB)

    Submitted:

    April 3, 2014

    Decided:

    July 10, 2014

    Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gregory S. Hines, Appellant Pro Se.


    Lara Kate Jacobs Todd,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory S. Hines appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See

    Hines v. Mathena, No. 7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21,


    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like