Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Broadnax Roderick v. Lawrence Hogan, JR., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Broadnax Keith Roderick and Rodney Ryan Graves appealed a district court decision dismissing their complaint against the Governor and Attorney General of Maryland under Rule 8(a) for failure to provide a short and plain statement of their claims. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellants' motion for default judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Broadnax Roderick v. Lawrence Hogan, JR., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Broadnax Keith Roderick and Rodney Ryan Graves appealed a district court decision dismissing their complaint against the Governor and Attorney General of Maryland under Rule 8(a) for failure to provide a short and plain statement of their claims. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellants' motion for default judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2438

    Original Title

    Broadnax Roderick v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Broadnax Keith Roderick and Rodney Ryan Graves appealed a district court decision dismissing their complaint against the Governor and Attorney General of Maryland under Rule 8(a) for failure to provide a short and plain statement of their claims. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellants' motion for default judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Broadnax Roderick v. Lawrence Hogan, JR., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Broadnax Keith Roderick and Rodney Ryan Graves appealed a district court decision dismissing their complaint against the Governor and Attorney General of Maryland under Rule 8(a) for failure to provide a short and plain statement of their claims. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellants' motion for default judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2438

    BROADNAX KEITH RODERICK, Dba. Keith Roderick


    GRAVES RODNEY RYAN, Dba. Rodney Ryan Graves,

    Broadnax;

    Petitioners Appellants,
    v.
    LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor, Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Magistrate of the State of Maryland; BRIAN E.
    FROSH, Dba. Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
    Judge. (8:15-cv-02805-DKC)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 2016

    Decided:

    May 17, 2016

    Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Broadnax Keith Roderick; Graves Rodney Ryan, Appellants Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Keith Roderick Broadnax and Rodney Ryan Graves appeal the
    district courts order dismissing their complaint under Fed. R.
    Civ.

    P.

    8(a).

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Roderick v. Hogan, No. 8:15-cv-02805-DKC

    (D. Md. Oct. 13 & Nov. 16, 2015).


    for default judgment.

    We deny Appellants motion

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like